Question on R0005 - cardinality of wsa:To header
6 views
Skip to first unread message
Rimas Rekasius
Apr 29, 2005, 6:36:04 PM4/29/05
to basi...@googlegroups.com
----- Forwarded by Rimas Rekasius/Chicago/IBM on 04/29/2005 05:34 PM -----
| Rimas Rekasius/Chicago/IBM
04/07/2005 04:39 PM |
|
Hi Nilo!
Thanks for your question. I'm glad you're interested in the Basic B2B Profile, and appreciate your making a contribution. Let me look into this a bit, then I'll send you my observations and we can discuss this further. In the meantime, please feel free to share any other comments/questions/concerns that you might have on the profile. It is only via such collaboration that we can make this profile a valuable piece of work.
Regards,
Rimas V. Rekasius
e-business Industry Standards Architect
1-312-245-6775 (voice/FAX)
1-773-934-2705 (cell phone)
- - Spec - -
Name: Nilo Mitra
Email: nilo....@ericsson.com
User may be contacted
Other offerings may be sent to the user
Title: zzz
Subject: Spec Feedback - basicb2b
Feedback Comments:
Hi Chris:
I can't understand Requirement R0005 in section 4.1 which states:
"When there are more than one wsa:To header blocks present in an
ENVELOPE.....etc. "
I could not find anything in the WS-Addr member submission that said that
there could be more than one wsa:To header. The W3C WD seems also to have
only a single wsa:To header targeted at the ultimate recipient. Perhaps I
overlooked something obvious...
Thanks,
Nilo
Rimas Rekasius
Apr 29, 2005, 6:38:24 PM4/29/05
to basi...@googlegroups.com
----- Forwarded by Rimas Rekasius/Chicago/IBM on 04/29/2005 05:38 PM -----
| Rimas Rekasius/Chicago/IBM
04/15/2005 02:44 PM |
|
Hi Nilo!
It's been a while since I last wrote to you on this topic, so I wanted to at least give you a quick update on your question. Unfortunately, I do not yet have a definitive answer. I have been unable to get a response from the IBMers involved with the WS-Addressing spec, so at the suggestion of Mark Nottingham, I posed the question to his WG on the W3C's public WS-Addressing comments mailing list [1]. Again, I will let you know when I have a definitive answer from either my IBM sources, or the W3C WS-Addressing WG. Thank you for your patience.
Regards,
Rimas V. Rekasius
e-business Industry Standards Architect
1-312-245-6775 (voice/FAX)
1-773-934-2705 (cell phone)
Doug Davis
Apr 30, 2005, 7:11:10 PM4/30/05
to basi...@googlegroups.com
Nilo,
The current WS-Addr spec lists the cardinality of the wsa:To header as simply "mandatory". Its not so much that the spec says there can be more than one but rather that it doesn't say that there can't be more than one. So, without the WS-Addr spec being more restrictive the B2B profile filled in the missing restriction by requiring each wsa:To (if there is more than one) to be targeted to different node/intermediary - thus avoid confusion that would arise if more than one were processed by a single soap node.
-Doug
| Rimas Rekasius/Chicago/IBM@IBMUS
04/29/2005 06:38 PM
|
|
Christopher B Ferris
May 12, 2005, 11:25:29 AM5/12/05
to basi...@googlegroups.com
+1
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chri...@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chri...@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages