Dissemination Method:
Linda Maio has our group's e-mail address and many of our e-mail addresses
from multiple contacts from us. She represents us and she should have
contacted us directly. Why were we not directly contacted? Are we not part
of district 1? Are we not the ones directly impacted by this issue?
Quality of Space Argument:
The educational content and format of this class is not up to our district
to decide. Making the space suitability an issue not on the merits of
safety, or regarding locating it amongst adults including ex-cons and sex
offenders but that it is ONE classroom is a losing proposition. All the BUSD
needs to do is get two classrooms!
But perhaps this is problem with Linda Maio. She does not represent us; she
represents herself. She makes the argument that a resident of MLK and
Berkeley Way would make; not a resident of San Pablo and Francisco. After
all she did call herself an "educator."
Safety:
Linda Maio will NOT demand anything from the BUSD regarding safety - I hope
she proves me wrong but I don't hold my breath. Her intent is for this to be
her sole input to the issue as she already says "I am away from Berkeley at
this writing but wanted to get a message to you before you voted on placing
the CS at the Adult School." She effectively states that HER concern is
academic even though her CONSTITUENTS' concern is public safety. She even
acknowledge that: "As the Councilmember for the District where the Adult
School is located I am well acquainted with the neighborhood issues
regarding locating the proposed Community School at that site, largely
regarding safety."
So who is Linda Maio really representing?
Do you feel your concerns are adequately addressed or that your position is
represented?
Charis
DO NOT FORWARD OR REPOST WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION. COPYRIGHT (c) 2011
Dear Neighbors,
-- Brad
TO: BUSD Board
are where the 20 - 40 independent study (IS) students will be coming,