Am i correct in saying that the Puppet Setup does not enable RBL checks in
SA or MailScanner ?
Does it make a diferece to Baruwa, if RBL checks are done by MailScanner or
SA?
In MailScanner.conf i noticed that the MTA = sendmail, however the Puppet
installed Exim, is that correct?
Shawn
--
View this message in context: http://baruwa-users-list.963389.n3.nabble.com/Puppet-install-SA-MS-config-tp3868781p3868781.html
Sent from the Baruwa users list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Keep Baruwa FREE - http://pledgie.com/campaigns/12056
Postfix is the easiest and recommended to use MTA for RBL checks as the message is not even processed by MS/SA.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On 29 Mar 2012, at 9:25 PM, Shawn Smith <s...@it4.co.za> wrote:
> I have noticed that there are no RBL checks being done on my test server,
> which is Centos 5.2 and installed by Puppet toaster.
the rbl checks are being done by exim at smtp time, there is no point in processing messages from folks who are on an rbl
>
> Am i correct in saying that the Puppet Setup does not enable RBL checks in
> SA or MailScanner ?
the rbls in sa do not need enabling, the puppet install enables spamcop checks in mail scanner as there are too harsh to use at smtp time
> Does it make a diferece to Baruwa, if RBL checks are done by MailScanner or
> SA?
> In MailScanner.conf i noticed that the MTA = sendmail, however the Puppet
> installed Exim, is that correct?
that is because baruwa overides the default options in mailscanner.conf using baruwa.conf
On 29 Mar 2012, at 9:27 PM, Jeremy McSpadden <jer...@fluxlabs.net> wrote:
> Your looking for an automated installer that pre-configures your system? That doesn't exist. You still need to configure SA, MS and your MTA.
this is exactly what puppet does, if u want to modify anything you edit either the manifests or the templates you don't have to do any configuration after running puppet
I am noticing blatant spam getting through that is coming from hosts listed in certain RBL's, should i be adding more RBL lists into exim.conf to remedy this ?
Is there any harm in letting SA or MailScanner handle RBL's so that false positives are stored and able to release to end users ?
What are the better RBL's to use?
On 29 Mar 2012, at 11:15 PM, Glenn Kelley <gl...@typo3usa.com> wrote:
> That being said - let me ask a simple question.
>
> What are the better RBL's to use?
spamhaus is the most reliable I have used
Thanks again however