Fw: RE: Field Instruments

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Taye Alemayehu

unread,
Apr 3, 2012, 2:57:25 AM4/3/12
to baro...@googlegroups.com
Dear Baros, ..........



Taye Alemayehu
Geology, GIS, RS, Natural Resources Mgt & Environmental Geology (BSc., MSc.)
P.O.Box 30664,

Addis Ababa

Ethiopia

Telephone 251-116-457103 (Res.)/0911 212505(Mob.)

mailto:tay...@yahoo.com



--- On Tue, 4/3/12, Taye Alemayehu <tay...@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Taye Alemayehu <tay...@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Field Instruments
To: "JonathonDrasdis" <dra...@engr.uconn.edu>
Cc: "Gebremichael MeKonnen" <meko...@engr.uconn.edu>, "Tena Alamirew" <alamir...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 1:43 AM

Dear Jon,


Sorry for the delay. We were discussing on the issue as a group.


We still need the deep meter (up to 300 m) for a one time measurement- Method 1. We want to use it only for deep boreholes that will be measured in a long time interval.  As mentioned in the list of items, only two deep meters are enough. The product you mentioned on Method 2 is of great importance. As you may have seen it in the list, our request includes automatic pieziometer (item #4). We can use these divers to replace this item while using them as method one for shallow wells. The problem with this item is in telling the amount required. Yesterday, we tried to estimate the required amount to cover such large areas of 76,000 km2. We selected some key locations and places of existing wells on a map and came up with a minimum figure of 100.  Those data loggers that measure level, temperature and conductivity are most appropriate for the work.

3. Field test kit- there are also some field kits that can measure bicarbonates in addition to the tree parameters you mentioned. If such products are not easy to get the one you found is still sufficient.

7. Stream flow rate- Jon, we are dealing with big rivers. From the historical record we got a maximum discharge of 1594m3/second.  As mentioned in some reports the velocity of the river is around 2 m/s. Our planned to use boat to take this measurement.

8. Laser range finder- this item is required to measure river width that ranges from <100 to 500 meters from place to place



I'll communicate you for if there is any remaining issues.

All the best!
Taye

Taye Alemayehu
Geology, GIS, RS, Natural Resources Mgt & Environmental Geology (BSc., MSc.)
P.O.Box 30664,

Addis Ababa

Ethiopia

Telephone 251-116-457103 (Res.)/0911 212505(Mob.)

mailto:tay...@yahoo.com



--- On Fri, 3/30/12, Drasdis, Jonathon <dra...@engr.uconn.edu> wrote:

From: Drasdis, Jonathon <dra...@engr.uconn.edu>
Subject: RE: Field Instruments
To: "Taye Alemayehu" <tay...@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Mekonnen Gebremichael" <meko...@engr.uconn.edu>
Date: Friday, March 30, 2012, 10:42 AM

Taye,

Thank you and it is good to meet you too!  I have a series of questions for you regarding the list of field research equipment I have reviewed with Dr. Mekonnen Gebremichael.

 

I will number the questions sequentially for each item requested the way they were proposed on the table presented to me:

 

2) “Deep meter (up to 300m)”: There is actually a lot to consider here and it is also related to item # (4), but I will try to be brief but will describe two (2) methods. If you consider a water level meter, I immediately think about two possible techniques in making the measurement.

 

Method 1:  There is the standard electronic tape measure which will allow you to lower the water sensing device to a depth (up to 300 m) and then take a manual measurement from the top of the tape. This is a one time measurement at each well and can not be left in the well.  Please see the following link if you are not sure what I am referring to: http://www.rickly.com/sm/WaterLevelMeters.htm

 

Method 2:  There is the water level recorder or pressure transducer type. This will be a pressure sensing device that will detect how much water is above the sensor. This means the sensor is normally fixed in the well and left there permanently, or it is raised and lowered. It is best if set permanently and then the data can be downloaded at the ground surface (top of well) without pulling the sensor from the well. You can collect data on 5, 10 15, 30 min, etc., intervals while the unit is left their remotely. Data can be collected periodically (once every few months or more often if needed) by retrieving via computer connection. This will give a continuous record were as Method 1 will give only a single point measurement in time. However, Method 1 will give a longer use (maybe 10-15 yr service life). Service life on Method 2 could be 2-10 yrs.  This is a good example of Method 2: http://www.solinst.com/Prod/3001/3001.html

 

3) “Field Test Kit”: I found a fairly nice field portable meter that measures water temperature, electrical conductivity and pH with one probe.  Are these parameters sufficient or do you feel that something more is needed?

 

7) “Stream flow rate measurements”:  Can you give me a sense of the maximum expected velocity measurement needed? They make different meters for various ranges of flow (high flow or low flow) and it will be good that we match the expected flow conditions as closely as possible so that we do not send something that is below the range of maximum flow (or vice versa). Just give a range in m/sec.

 

8) “Laser range finder”: what will this be used for? What is maximum range distance (approximately) needed?

 

Please feel free to comment on any other issues that you have since considered and I will do my best to explain or consider while picking out potential equipment.

 

Cheers,

 

Jonathon B. Drasdis, Laboratory Supervisor
Laboratory Safety Committee, Chair
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
261 Glenbrook Road, Unit 2037
Storrs, Connecticut 06269-2037

 

 


From: Taye Alemayehu [mailto:tay...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:34 PM
To: Drasdis, Jonathon
Cc: Mekonnen Gebremichael
Subject: Re: Field Instruments

 

Dear Jon,

It is my pleasure to know you. You are  welcome whenever you need my assistance.

All the best!
Taye

Taye Alemayehu
Geology, GIS, RS, Natural Resources Mgt & Environmental Geology (BSc., MSc.)
P.O.Box 30664,

Addis Ababa

Ethiopia

Telephone 251-116-457103 (Res.)/0911 212505(Mob.)

mailto:tay...@yahoo.com



--- On Thu, 3/29/12, Mekonnen Gebremichael <meko...@engr.uconn.edu> wrote:


From: Mekonnen Gebremichael <meko...@engr.uconn.edu>
Subject: Field Instruments
To: "Taye Alemayehu" <tay...@yahoo.com>, "Drasdis, Jonathon" <dra...@engr.uconn.edu>
Date: Thursday, March 29, 2012, 12:57 PM

Dear Jon and Taye:

 

I am writing to introduce you to each other.

 

Jon: Taye is a PhD student in Ethiopia who requested the list of field instruments I shared.

 

Taye: Jon is our lab manager, and he is helping us with field instruments acquisition.

 

Jon: please feel free to contact Taye for further clarification on the requested items.

 

Thanks both,

Mekonnen

 

 

Taye Alemayehu

unread,
Apr 3, 2012, 3:00:43 AM4/3/12
to baro...@googlegroups.com
2nd mail, I sent to Jon.


Taye Alemayehu
Geology, GIS, RS, Natural Resources Mgt & Environmental Geology (BSc., MSc.)
P.O.Box 30664,

Addis Ababa

Ethiopia

Telephone 251-116-457103 (Res.)/0911 212505(Mob.)

mailto:tay...@yahoo.com



--- On Tue, 4/3/12, Taye Alemayehu <tay...@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Taye Alemayehu <tay...@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Field Instruments
To: "JonathonDrasdis" <dra...@engr.uconn.edu>
Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 2:11 AM

Hi Jon,

The second option is best fit for our purpose. The figure I gave in my previous mail is only average velocity. There are places with high and low velocities.

Regards,
Taye

Taye Alemayehu
Geology, GIS, RS, Natural Resources Mgt & Environmental Geology (BSc., MSc.)
P.O.Box 30664,

Addis Ababa

Ethiopia

Telephone 251-116-457103 (Res.)/0911 212505(Mob.)

mailto:tay...@yahoo.com



--- On Mon, 4/2/12, Drasdis, Jonathon <dra...@engr.uconn.edu> wrote:

From: Drasdis, Jonathon <dra...@engr.uconn.edu>
Subject: RE: Field Instruments
To: "Taye Alemayehu" <tay...@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Mekonnen Gebremichael" <meko...@engr.uconn.edu>
Date: Monday, April 2, 2012, 3:52 PM

Hi Taye, I hope this email catches you in good spirits.

 

I have not heard back from you regarding my questions posed last week, but I wanted to follow up with #7 below: for the “streamflow rate measurements” device, normally there are two flow ranges that are specified and it is important to match the flow with the minimum and maximum that you would expect in the field.  You may not be able to match both ranges exactly, but which ever is more important to you would try to match as closely as possible. For example, if you can indicate whether or not you would be measuring the high or the low flow range below:

 

Low is between 0.1 ft/sec to 4.9 ft/sec

High between 0.5 ft/sec to 25 ft/sec

 

Jonathon B. Drasdis, Laboratory Supervisor
Laboratory Safety Committee, Chair
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
261 Glenbrook Road, Unit 2037
Storrs, Connecticut 06269-2037

 

 

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages