I also have to ask if a "game" after the intro is the best solution.
The best introduction "thing" I have seen is when people are mulling
before the event are given the challenge of gathering signatures of
people who have achieved something on the list. Appeared on TV, been
married abroad, and speak 3 languages or examples.
What about registration and networking (and Tea?) at 9am and starting
the welcome at 10am (that will naturally be late, because it always
is) and move the morning on by 15 minutes so session 1 starts at
10:45am and we only have 60 minutes for lunch.
Alistair
Ps. I like the idea of the longer session being just after a break to
try and make it easer to understand, but it still feels complicated to
me. I would prefer running different lengths on different days, but if
we keep changing we will not get anywhere so lets not.
On 25 October 2010 22:29, Carin_C <bc.cam...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Alistair
Alistair
+1.
--
Tom Morris
<http://tommorris.org/>
Alistair
Doors do open 9:30am. Ideally sessions start at 11:00 with welcome
talk and intros at 10.
Theres a load emails above I need to read through andnwill come back
with something more solid later.
Kevin
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010, Alistair MacDonald
A suggestion that kind of matches up with everyone's thoughts...... If
we publish the start for 10am as Kevin suggests, but use that time for
the "networking" (as per other thread) and we can safely have a queue
for 30 minutes without running late. Intros at 10:30am. This gives 45
minutes for the intro, to do the grid, and starting late (that always
happens, always), and some more "networking". We then continue with
Reinier's proposed schedule from session 2. If we want the first
session to be 30 instead of 20 then we can take that from just before
or after.
Alistair
Pretty sure we can open the grid from 10am, and do the welcome plus intro session in 30 mins.
Any objections?
Kevin
Alistair
Kevin
Will get leeky to do the schedule update.
Kevin