Sent to my MP, Tahir Ali, Labour
Subject: Overseas Frozen State Pension – An Issue of Equality and Fairness for British Citizens
Dear Tahir Ali,
As one of your constituents and a registered overseas voter, I am writing to bring to your attention a matter of profound injustice and financial discrimination: the policy of "freezing" the UK State Pension for British citizens residing in countries like Australia, Canada and New Zealand, (and many more). It is officially estimated by the Electoral Commission that there are now 204,000 overseas UK registered overseas voters - not an insignificant number. I have recently read horror stories of UK pensioners living in extreme poverty overseas having had their UK state pension frozen in the 1990s at levels of less than sixty pounds per week!
I began working full-time at the age of 16 and have meticulously paid my National Insurance (NI) contributions throughout my entire working life (in my case up to the age of 66). These contributions were paid into the exact same fund, under the exact same rules, as those who chose to remain in the United Kingdom or move to countries with reciprocal agreements (such as the USA, Switzerland, the Philippines or EEA nations). Yet, simply because I have chosen to reside in Australia, the real value of my pension is being eroded by inflation every year. This policy arbitrarily divides British pensioners into two classes based solely on geographical location.
Furthermore, it is important to highlight that by residing outside of the UK, expats like myself represent a significant net financial saving to the UK Treasury. By living abroad, I draw absolutely nothing from the following state-funded services and benefits:
The National Health Service (NHS): I place zero operational or financial burden on an already overstretched healthcare system.
Housing Benefit and Pension Credit: I receive no income-related supplements or state-subsidised housing support.
Council Tax Support and Social Care: I do not utilise local authority resources or adult social care provisions.
Universal Pension Perks: I draw no benefits from taxpayer-funded schemes such as the Winter Fuel Payment, free bus passes, or the over-75 free TV licence.
When these factors are quantified, British pensioners living abroad actually save the UK taxpayer billions of pounds collectively. For the government to pocket these savings while simultaneously penalising my rightful state pension—earned through decades of hard work—is morally indefensible.
This is a fundamental matter of equality, fairness, and contract.
My British citizenship and my voting rights remain intact; my financial contributions to the state were made in full. It is entirely unjust that the state should fail to honor its side of that social contract based on my postcode.
As my representative in Parliament, I urge you to break the cross-party silence on this issue. I ask that you raise this matter with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and advocate for a policy shift—or international reciprocal agreements —to end the scandal of the current frozen pension policy.
I look forward to hearing your views on this matter and learning what actions you intend to take on behalf of your overseas constituents.
Yours sincerely,
Neil Hillman.
Last Registered UK Voting Address: XX XXXXXX XXX, Moseley, Birmingham, B13 XXX.
Reply from Tahir Ali, Labour...
Dear Neil,Thank you for contacting me about Overseas Frozen State Pensions.The issue of State Pension uprating for recipients living abroad is an important one. I sympathise with your concerns and welcome the fact that Ministers have met with representatives of the End Frozen Pensions campaign.The State Pension is payable worldwide to those who qualify for it, regardless of nationality. However, as you know, it is only uprated for people living outside the United Kingdom where there is a legal requirement to do so. This is the case, for example, in countries with which the UK has a reciprocal agreement that provides for uprating.The Government has been asked about this issue in Parliament on many occasions. In a recent Debate held in February, Ministers repeated that there are no current intentions to widen bilateral social security agreements to provide for State Pension uprating where this is not already the case. This approach has been in place for over 70 years and has been followed by successive governments. For many years, the Department for Work and Pensions has provided clear information for people moving to and living overseas, explaining the rules governing State Pension uprating. It is essential that people have access to this information when deciding whether to move abroad.I note that many countries have means-tested provisions that are similar to Pension Credit and, where the real-terms value of a pension has fallen, this may be compensated for by higher means-tested payments. It is also the case that the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office tries to negotiate reciprocal arrangements with other countries. As you may know, an agreement previously existed with Australia, but the Australian government chose to terminate it.At present, the state of public finances, inherited from the previous Government, means tough choices are inevitable. The longstanding policy on pensions uprating involves real costs and trade-offs. Given these circumstances, the responsible thing to do is to fix the foundations of our economy and bring back economic stability.Please be assured that I will continue to follow any developments in this area with interest. Thank you once again for contacting me.Yours sincerely,Tahir Ali MP,
Member of Parliament for Birmingham Hall Green & Moseley.