Pl.read below:--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAMCbyDTMWDyfWTkLNEBZjvr5kVRG%2BPr8ZiwJ8ng7XTc0J%2BmRag%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAM%3DeiW0eYUz0thtFwZ9iNGkcfF%2Bwb3U68Jc%3D7VP7nQ%3DfYUpp3g%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAE0--Gx5P_UkY%2Bm3x0upAcSGA98GwHh9k58ASWxf23auCa1mWA%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAE0--Gx5P_UkY%2Bm3x0upAcSGA98GwHh9k58ASWxf23auCa1mWA%40mail.gmail.com.
Dear Friends,
01.Retirees who are keenly observing every past developments on resolving retirees issues may not view the latest development of filing a case before Mumbai High Court by AIBOA ,as a right step, especially while they are one of the parties authorised to discuss and resolve employees as well as retirees issues with IBA under BPS/JN system prevailing.(Though not discussing!)
02.Especially, while the leader of majority employees union often found blaming retirees/their Associations for seeking judicial remedy even in issues unresolved under bilateral talks!
At the same time,it is an undisputed reality that we could resolve a number of unresolved long pending issues through legal fight.
03.IBA too found asked AIBPARC in their latest meet to withdraw the case pending before Apex Court( SLP(C)5561/2016 on Updation of Pension) to pave way for bilateral discussions and resolution.Intention may be good some time.
03.Even decade back while dismissing the CWP-6233/2008 filed by M C SINGLA and Ors Vs Union of India ,before Punjab and Haryana High Court,Chandigarh, on Updation of Pension on 16.04.2012 the single Judge recorded as follows,:
Quote:
“I am merely stating this in the passing that the petitioners could not have come to the High Court for enforcement under Article 226 when they could have only pressed for better rights through negotiations in the manner that the settlement talks provided. It would be open for the petitioners to make the demands for parity if they are so advised and use their bargaining skills through
the mechanism provided their associations and press for the reliefs though under the Industrial Disputes Act.”
04.Hon.FM /MOF too often stated in Parliament while answering questions on Updation of Pension to arrive on consensus between unions and IBA under existing system of bilateral discussions and send the proposal to them to sort out the issue.Same has not happened so far!
05.Though retirees Apex Organisations demanded for a platform to share their views on retirees issues IBA is always reluctant to entertain them.Even UFBU too never had effective discussions with retirees Apex Organisations on their issues!
06.As indicated by court and Ministry ,all may agree that direct dialogue with IBA by Unions is the best way to resolve our issues,than seeking legal remedy.
Under this backdrop action of a party who is part of existing system itself seek legal remedy afresh now on retirees issues may raise doubt on real motive behind their action at this juncture! A chance to IBA to advocate on “ Subjudice” .Sad state of affairs!
It is your ATTITUDE not your APTITUDE which determines your ALTITUDE in life.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAGGQR5-49dk-89unB9oRNEMAbTPm3OtvH1SCQiGv6XiLd6Yn8g%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAMCbyDT9FK4qWyjooTsJu-4sjPN0kQODnrUivrX23ORaEx6dSw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/488370075.270073.1750343545438%40mail.yahoo.com.