𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐂𝐈𝐑𝐂𝐔𝐋𝐀𝐑 𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐌𝐄𝐄𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐎𝐍 13 03 2025 :𝐌𝐘 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞 : (By Com.𝒀𝒖𝒏𝒖𝒔 𝑴, SBI Retiree 𝑯𝒚𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒃𝒂𝒅 )

[Srinivasa Murti Devulapalli]

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

👇👇💢Feedback#37💢👇👇

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐂𝐈𝐑𝐂𝐔𝐋𝐀𝐑 𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐌𝐄𝐄𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐎𝐍

 13 03 2025 :𝐌𝐘 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞 : (𝒀𝒖𝒏𝒖𝒔 𝑴, SBI Retiree 𝑯𝒚𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒃𝒂𝒅 )

                    

💢𝑸𝑼𝑶𝑻𝑬💢: 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎 𝑫𝑨 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒖𝒍𝒂 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝑷𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒔: 𝑾𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑫𝑨 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒖𝒍𝒂 𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕-12𝒕𝒉 𝑩𝑷𝑺/9𝒕𝒉 𝑱𝒐𝒊𝒏𝒕 𝑵𝒐𝒕𝒆 𝒃𝒆 𝒆𝒙𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒐𝒖𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒔. 𝑰𝑩𝑨  𝑰𝑵𝑫𝑰𝑪𝑨𝑻𝑬𝑫 𝑻𝑯𝑨𝑻 𝑻𝑯𝑬𝒀 𝑨𝑹𝑬 𝑶𝑷𝑬𝑵  𝑻𝑶 𝑫𝑰𝑺𝑪𝑼𝑺𝑺 𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑰𝑺𝑺𝑼𝑬 𝑰𝑭 𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑴𝑶𝑫𝑰𝑭𝑰𝑪𝑨𝑻𝑰𝑶𝑵 𝑾𝑰𝑳𝑳 𝑩𝑬 𝑪𝑶𝑺𝑻- 𝑵𝑬𝑼𝑻𝑹𝑨𝑳 𝑨𝑵𝑫 𝑾𝑰𝑻𝑯𝑶𝑼𝑻 𝑨𝑵𝒀 𝑨𝑫𝑫𝑰𝑻𝑰𝑶𝑵𝑨𝑳 𝑪𝑶𝑺𝑻 𝑻𝑶 𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑩𝑨𝑵𝑲𝑺.  𝑼𝑵𝑰𝑶𝑵𝑺 𝑯𝑨𝑽𝑬 𝑩𝑬𝑬𝑵 𝑹𝑬𝑸𝑼𝑬𝑺𝑻𝑬𝑫 𝑻𝑶 𝑺𝑼𝑩𝑴𝑰𝑻 𝑨  𝑵𝑶𝑻𝑬 𝑻𝑶  𝑰𝑩𝑨 𝑶𝑵 𝑻𝑯𝑰𝑺 𝑰𝑺𝑺𝑼𝑬... 💢𝑼𝑵𝑸𝑼𝑶𝑻𝑬💢      

                                       

𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙄𝘽𝘼, 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙤 𝘿𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙪𝙨𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙄𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙚 𝙞𝙛 𝙄𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝘾𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙉𝙚𝙪𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙄𝙣 𝙂𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙨 𝙑𝙞𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙁𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙎𝘽𝙄 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙋𝙎𝘽𝙨.

𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝘿𝙤 𝙉𝙤𝙩 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙢 𝙩𝙤 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙖𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙄𝙣 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝘿𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙍𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙛 𝙞𝙨 𝙋𝙖𝙮𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙋𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝘽𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙀𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙤𝙮𝙚𝙚𝙨 - 𝙊𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙚𝙧𝙨.

𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘽𝙖𝙨𝙚 𝙔𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙁𝙤𝙧 𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙪𝙢𝙚𝙧 𝙋𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙭 𝙞𝙨 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙙 𝙁𝙧𝙤𝙢 1960 𝙩𝙤 𝙖 𝙍𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝘿𝙖𝙩𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙚 𝙈𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙙𝙤𝙡𝙤𝙜𝙮 𝙉𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝘽𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙠𝙚𝙙.

𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙈𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝘽𝙚  𝘼𝙪𝙩𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙘 - 𝙉𝙚𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙄𝘽𝘼 𝙉𝙤𝙧 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝘽𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙨 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝘿𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙉𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝘼𝙙𝙤𝙥𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙪𝙡𝙖 𝙁𝙤𝙧 𝙋𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨, 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙉𝙤 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙗𝙡𝙚𝙢 𝙞𝙣 𝙎𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙎𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙁𝙤𝙧 𝙎𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙛𝙛.

𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙖 𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚 𝙖𝙢𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝘿𝙍 𝘽𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙋𝙖𝙞𝙙 𝙄𝙨 𝙈𝙚𝙧𝙜𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝘽𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙘 𝙋𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝘽𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙨𝙩, 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙈𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝘽𝙚 𝘽𝙤𝙧𝙣𝙚 𝘽𝙮 𝘽𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙨.

𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙐𝙣𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙚𝙥𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙈𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙃𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝘽𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙥𝙤𝙩 𝘽𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙇𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙈𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙇𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙐𝙁𝘽𝙐.

𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙎𝙚𝙚𝙢 𝙩𝙤 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝘽𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙡𝙪𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙤𝙛  𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙏𝙧𝙤𝙟𝙖𝙣 𝙃𝙤𝙧𝙨𝙚 𝙖𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢, 𝘾𝙃𝙑, 𝙁𝙤𝙧 𝙬𝙝𝙤𝙢 𝘾𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙈𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙀𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙤 𝙁𝙖𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙛𝙪𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙁𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙋𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙁𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨. 𝙄𝘽𝘼 𝙄𝙎 𝙑𝙄𝙊𝙇𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙒𝙄𝙏𝙃 𝙄𝙈𝙋𝙐𝙉𝙄𝙏𝙔, 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙋𝙍𝙊𝙑𝙄𝙎𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙋𝙀𝙉𝙎𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙁𝙐𝙉𝘿 𝙍𝙐𝙇𝙀𝙎 𝘼𝙉𝘿 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙐𝙁𝘽𝙐 𝙇𝙀𝘼𝘿𝙀𝙍𝙎 𝘼𝙍𝙀 𝙉𝙊𝙏 𝙀𝙑𝙀𝙉 𝙌𝙐𝙀𝙎𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙎𝙐𝘾𝙃 𝘽𝙇𝘼𝙏𝙀𝙉𝙏 𝘿𝙄𝙎𝙍𝙀𝙎𝙀𝙋𝙀𝘾𝙏 𝙏𝙊 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙇𝘼𝙒𝙎 𝙊𝙁 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙇𝘼𝙉𝘿

𝙒𝙝𝙤 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 "𝘾𝙊𝙎𝙏-𝙉𝙀𝙐𝙏𝙍𝙇" 𝘼𝙧𝙜𝙪𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙈𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙃𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝘽𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙥𝙤𝙩. 𝘼𝙡𝙖𝙨, 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙉𝙤𝙩 𝘿𝙤𝙣𝙚, 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙍𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙞𝙧𝙘𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧. 𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖 𝘿𝙚𝙨𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙁𝙤𝙧 𝙐𝙁𝘽𝙐 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙖 𝙇𝙞𝙛𝙚 𝙏𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙂𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙘 𝙇𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧.

 𝒀𝒖𝒏𝒖𝒔 𝑴 

 SBI Retiree

 𝑯𝒚𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒃𝒂𝒅

 14 03 2025

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺ 

👆👆💢Feedback#37💢👇👇

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐌 𝐃𝐑  𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐏𝐄𝐍𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐒  𝐎𝐍 𝐏𝐀𝐑 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝟏𝟐𝐭𝐡. 𝐁𝐏𝐒 𝐑𝐄𝐓𝐈𝐑𝐄𝐄𝐒 - 𝘼𝙉 𝙐𝙉𝙍𝙀𝙎𝙊𝙇𝙑𝙀𝘿 𝙍𝙀𝙎𝙄𝘿𝙐𝘼𝙇 𝙄𝙎𝙎𝙐𝙀

𝐀𝐧 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐫𝐡 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐏𝐄𝐍𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐔𝐏𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐞𝐱𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐞

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

 " ✳️" 𝑰𝑷𝑺𝑶-𝑭𝑨𝑪𝑻𝑶 𝑹𝑩𝑰 𝑭𝑶𝑹𝑴𝑼𝑳𝑨" -  A NEW "MARKETING TAGLINE" - TO DITCH THE RETIREES....

𝑨 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒚 𝑹𝒆𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒎𝒚 𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒂𝒔𝒆  𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒐𝒏* *29 11 2023 - 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒔 𝑰𝑩𝑨 - 𝑨𝑰𝑩𝑬𝑨 𝑵𝑬𝑿𝑼𝑺 𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒅-𝒈𝒂𝒎𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒈𝒚

https://www.change.org/p/hon-ble-prime-minister-of-india-sri-narendra-modi-plight-of-the-bank-retirees-urgency-to-constitute-banking-pay-commission/u/32132685

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINKS FOR THE ANTECIDENTS THAT PAVED THE WAY TO THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING DATES- ie:

 13 03 2025,

 18 03 2025  &

 20 03 2025 

https://youtu.be/khwnUk7u9Ck?si=6Et01nq5j06pZcpU

             AND

 https://youtu.be/cTbykaLdht8?si=DnkA6TeNmjNbteMx

                    

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

 𝕌𝕡𝕕𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝕚𝕤 𝕗𝕠𝕣 𝕤𝕦𝕣𝕖 & 𝕔𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕒𝕚𝕟 𝕥𝕙𝕣𝕠𝕦𝕘𝕙  𝕊𝕌ℙℝ𝔼𝕄𝔼 ℂ𝕆𝕌ℝ𝕋 𝔸𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼‼️⚖️‼️

 ⚖️ || यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः ||⚖️ 

    🙏🌺🕉️🌺🙏

 దేవులపల్లి శ్రీనివాస మూర్తి

 d s murti

 08 03 2025

 Hyderbad 500079

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

d s murti

[Hans Raj Manuja]

As per IBA, they would consider merger of DA if it is cost neutral ! This issue is going to be as disastrous as updation of pension ; because UFBU lacks sincerety for the retirees' cause !

--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAKUBVvfBFcooTVjkgrFZJ3KJJOvA9d6rZzK8eiZJsMdrVv0kcw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Srinivasan K]

Unless the old war horse either voluntarily or forcefully goes out nothing good and legitimate ll ever happen to the retirees even though they r eligible for the long pending demands.
I don't even like to use the name of that leader in my comments as to that extent he is unfit to deal with the IBA regarding the issues of either the pensioners or the serving employees.
Retirees ll celebrate the day when he relinquishes ir forcefully sent out of his post .

[Srinivasa Murti Devulapalli]

👆👆

💢Feedback#38💢

                       👇👇

[15/03, 11:28 am] 

 UCOBk.Chennai

 Dr. L S Raman : 

📞 +91 94442 08570 

If payment of uniform  D.A,is cost prohibitive, what about payment to serving employees and five day Banking   involving cost on account of four days salary per month. 

Pensioners  worked for seven days to develop the Public Sector Banks  ,and when it is payment of pension the IBA is talking about economics and is accountable to the Pensioners and customers.

From Dr.L.S.Raman

💢💢💢

[14/03, 7:34 pm] 

 Hasmukhbhai Thakkar

 IOB Ahmedabad : 

📞 +91 87582 05646 

They are no more militant, learned and wise leaders. If they are so well befitting their leadership status, they would not have bifurcated pensioners in two groups like pre and post 2022 retirees fir the purpose of DA Payment. In this meeting of 13/03/2025 also, they did not argue against the cost implication for applying uniform DA formula for all pensioners. This reveals the leaders lukewarm attitude and negative approach towards the pensioners legitimate benefits. As rightly said by Respected Shri D Srinivasa Murty Sir ji, the negotiating team consists of IBA-UFBU NEXUS always finding ways and means to hurt bank pensioners fraternity. May God take care of their powers as the Almighty deem fit. 🙏

Hasmukhbhai Thakkar

💢💢💢

[14/03, 10:23 pm] 

BOB:NDLH 

 Dileep Tandon: 

📞 +91 98105 53832 

The new DA formula adopted by GOI making 2016= 100 is now a National level formula .

How IBA can ignore it on the ground of  cost neutral theory .

This formula if implemented can never be cost neutral  which means retirees will continue to be placed under old formula of 1960= 100 .

This is extremely illegitimate and Associations must strongly react to it .

 Dileep Tandon

💢💢💢

[14/03, 9:57 pm] 

 Synd.Bk . అనంతపురం

 Murali Mohan P:

📞 +91 85919 39067

 *Once again, UFBU proved that It's an Useless Union....then and there,  they should have asked, when Uniform DA is paid , how cannot It raises cost to funds...It's simple Common sense question....Fit for Nothing people and sitting in UFBU*

 Murali Mohan P

💢💢💢

[14/03, 4:43 pm] 

SBI. VJA. 

 కె భువనేశ్వర రావు : 

📞 +91 73826 26895

Who says IBA is not aware of these rules. This is not the first time shifting of base year .  How can they say it has to be studied . Very foolish on all the committee members. Why nobody suggested of earlier years of dealings when base year changed

Then why the cost impact  of such several meetings is not taken into account

 K Bhuvaneswar Rao

💢💢💢

[14/03, 10:32 pm] 

IOB. Trichi.

 Srinivasan Venkatraman:

📞 +91 96009 01470

If retired employees of an individual bank receiving pension every month, the DR as per CPI for a particular period should be paid by the bank from their P & L A/ c only if there is no sufficient funds in pension fund.

 V Srinivasan

💢💢💢

[14/03, 10:29 pm] 

Bank Of India

 T Pushpeswara Rao

Vijayawada: 

📞 +91 90380 22880

Non cost / cost neutral are newly coined, cannot be understood by the Octo geriatric.I don't want half kg,I want 500 gr only.if  so,sir what for it included in the agenda⁉️

 T Pushpeswara Rao

💢💢💢

[14/03, 09:35 pm] 

Dena Bk.

 Biswanath Bandyopadhyay.

📞+ 91 98192 43913 

𝐈𝐁𝐀- 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟

13 03 2025

𝐓𝐡𝐞  𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰, 𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞. 𝐈𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 :-

 𝟏). 𝐎𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐲𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐮𝐦 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐩 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬 , 𝐈𝐁𝐀’𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲  𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐟𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭. 𝐈𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡  𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 ⁉️ 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐟 𝐧𝐨 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐰𝐚𝐬  𝐝𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞𝐬 ⁉️ 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐲, 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐦𝐢𝐭 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞. 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫 ⁉️ 𝐀𝐬 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭, 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐁𝐀’𝐬 𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞. 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡. 𝐈𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬  𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐲𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐡 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝 .

 𝟐). 𝐎𝐧 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 , 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐞. 𝐃𝐢𝐝 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐨𝐫 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐞 ⁉️ 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐨 ⁉️ 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐲 ⁉️ 𝐈𝐧 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞.

 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭. 𝐒𝐨, 𝐢𝐟 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐡 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐨 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 .

𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐤𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐩𝐞𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐞.

𝐍𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭’𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐚 ‼️ 𝐀𝐥𝐬𝐨, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 "SECRET METHOD". 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭  𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐈𝐁𝐀, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐤𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐦𝐮𝐦 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬.* *𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐧𝐞𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐧𝐨𝐫 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝  𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐭 ⁉️

 𝟑). 𝐎𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐱𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚 , 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 ! 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞 ‼️ 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔’𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐯𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐟 08 03 2024, 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐀𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐥-𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒 ! 𝐖𝐚𝐬 𝐀𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐥-𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐫𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 ⁉️ 𝐈𝐟 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐨, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐧𝐨𝐰 ⁉️ 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭  𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐤𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐦𝐮𝐦 ⁉️ 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐟 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐝 ⁉️

 𝐒𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐲, 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐞 .

𝟒). 𝐎𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐜 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝟕𝟎, 𝟕𝟓, 𝟖𝟎, 𝟖𝟓 𝐞𝐭𝐜 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐧𝐨𝐫 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐟𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟 ‼️ 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚 𝐣𝐨𝐤𝐞 ‼️ 𝐍𝐨𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐡 𝐬𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 ‼️

𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐚 𝐨𝐟  𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥, 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐥𝐲.

𝐍𝐨𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐦𝐮𝐦 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐬𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐭 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝.

 𝑩𝒊𝒔𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒉 𝑩𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒚𝒐𝒑𝒂𝒅𝒉𝒚𝒂𝒚.

 14 03 2025

💢💢💢

[14/03, 10:48 pm] 

Synd. Bk. 

 M Subba Rao:

📞 +91 92480 00070

The meeting that was held and the reconciliation meeting to be held are only eyewash and time buying techniques that are being adopted by IBA and it's hench union leaders.This is being already spelt by you Murti garu.They want to stall the Court's decision on 20th March 2025.

 M Subba Rao

💢💢💢

[15/03, 4:54 am] 

 Vivek Prabhu : 

📞 +91 98444 95522

 It's disgusting how IBA/UFBU, sign 12th.BPS, 9th Joint note dt. 08 03 2024 ignoring rule 37 of pension regulation Act 1995 wherein it states same DA rate for employees as well as retirees, now talking about cost, very fishy 

 Vivek Prabhu

💢💢💢

[15/03, 4:53 am] 

UBI Sivasubramaniyam : 

📞+91 99126 32779

It is Time waste for Service Retirees, Intellectuals & Legal Counsels as STUPIDS are always chairing in VITAL DECISSION making posts, on either side of the table of / in that BPS System.

These Stupid Residuals of System generation GENERATED and PRECIPITATED several RESIDUAL ISSUES.

CANCER CELLS have to be REMOVED even though Surgery is MONEY SPENDING DEED.

PALATABLE food has to be cooked even if it incurs Cost.

Hair on any part of the body has to be trimmed even if it incurs cost.

These STUPIDS were BORN only after THEIR RESPECTIVE FATHERS had not thought that Money spending is Waste to have an Offspring, through Marriage. Had their respective Fathers were in otherwise opinion, THESE BPS SYSTEMS STUPIDS would NOT have been born.

ENLIGHTENMENT sets in when repentance cum realisation sets in. Behaviour cum Attitude Correction Experts too opined that Officials too deserve periodical IQ / Psychological Checkup. MENTAL WELL BEING SAVES THE WELL BEING OF AN OFFICE / INSTITUTION.

Thus, ONLY YOGI ADITYANATH JI can bulldoze such pathetic system's polluters. INDIA needs YOGI ADITYANATH as Finance Minister for ONE DAY, if not for ONE WEEK.

 

PRESIDENT OF INDIA must intervene.

 Sivasubramaniyam

💢💢💢

[14/03, 8:37 pm] 

PNB NDLH. 

 KUMAR : 

📞 +91 96542 97018

UFBU leaders are under obligation to explain their conduct while negotiating with IBA. Where is the stay by any court not to resolve updation issue amicably. Govt settle issues by having negotiations with concerned parties outside courts . All natak.

💢💢💢

 𝐃𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐀𝐥𝐥,

 𝐈𝐁𝐀-𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠:

 13 03 2025

———————————

 𝐀𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞𝐬, 𝐈 𝐚𝐦 𝐩𝐮𝐳𝐳𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐏𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐔𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐛-𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞.

𝐖𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐠𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐬. 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐭 𝟏𝟔𝟖𝟒 𝐃𝐀 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐱 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝟏𝟔𝟏𝟔 𝐭𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐢𝐭 𝐬𝐮𝐛 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐞.

𝐁𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐨, 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐬 (𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞)𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐲 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐞. 

𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐞𝐱-𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚, 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐀𝐆𝐑𝐄𝐄𝐃𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐘 𝟐𝟒-𝟐𝟓 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐔𝐒𝐒𝐄𝐃 𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 (𝟐𝟓-𝟐𝟔)𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐅𝐘 𝟐𝟒-𝟐𝟓. 𝐒𝐨, 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐔𝐒𝐒 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐀𝐆𝐑𝐄𝐄𝐃. 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐏𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞, 𝐞𝐱-𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐚 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫.

𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞𝐬, 𝐚𝐬 𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐔𝐅𝐁𝐔 - 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭. 𝐃𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐑𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐧𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐭. 𝐎𝐫 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐑𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚    “𝐍𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐂𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐇𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐫” 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐈𝐁𝐀/𝐃𝐅𝐒/𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐬 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐟𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭⁉️

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐁𝐀 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐃𝐀 𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫 & 𝐃𝐀𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 ( 𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟐𝐭𝐡 𝐁𝐏𝐒/𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐉𝐍) 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝. 

𝐖𝐞𝐥𝐥, 𝐢𝐭 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐲.

 𝑪 𝑲𝒂𝒓𝒖𝒏𝒂𝒌𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒏

 𝙂𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙮, 𝘼𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙀

💢UNQUOTE💢

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

𝕌𝕡𝕕𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝕚𝕤 𝕗𝕠𝕣 𝕤𝕦𝕣𝕖 & 𝕔𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕒𝕚𝕟 𝕥𝕙𝕣𝕠𝕦𝕘𝕙  𝕊𝕌ℙℝ𝔼𝕄𝔼 ℂ𝕆𝕌ℝ𝕋 𝔸𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼 ‼️⚖️‼️

 ⚖️ || यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः|| ⚖️ 

    🙏🌺🕉️🌺🙏

 దేవులపల్లి శ్రీనివాస మూర్తి

 d s murti

 15 03 2025

 Hyderbad 500079

✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

[Hans Raj Manuja]

When UFBU in general and CHV in particular were advocating that banks were in loss and so upgradation of pension was not possible, IBA had offered 2% hike in wages for working employees, UFBU rejected their offer and continued their fight and ultimately secured 15% hike. For retirees, banks were in loss but the banks were in profit for the working employees ! If the banks were in loss and upgradation was not possible for the retirees, why the UFBU did not accept 2% ?

       It is certain that UFBU is not inclined to watch our interest !

       

--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAKUBVveO_i9yyFCNznYC0y2ACeY9HFKKBsQNQEo17f6ZveOHLA%40mail.gmail.com.

[krishna mohan nidumolu]

It is not possible.
Without touching the basic pay of Pensioners it cannot done.
No provision for adhoc change of BP, without Updation.
Just not practical

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAE4MWALVcBR3apLbGQDgfm3RuVtg_Jgx1V1nw0GTkg_6nxeSzw%40mail.gmail.com.