Re: Digest for bankpensioner@googlegroups.com - 9 updates in 5 topics

[vaidya nathan]

Same Wage for Same Work

Sri C N Prasad Sir 

You are correct in this Point. If so,why do we allow different wage structures and  names for workmen in PSB, SBI and RBI. We are aware the Salary structure of SBI is always ahead of PSB employees and So RBI  employees mych more than SBI.  Only after PSB wage is settled, SBI starts its Negotiation as it is Easy and so RBI.  Every leader is a part of this Discrepancy for All Bipartite settlements . Not questioning anything. Then what genuineness is there to ask parity in Pension and Updation. Whether these things happened accidentally or  coincidence or  any other unknown Consideration for the leaders.  Nothing is Sure. I pray  atleast we get Updation with arrears from the Last Bipartite date, which itself will be  Boon. 

VAIDYANATHAN 

Banglore

On Wed, Aug 5, 2026, 5:25 PM <bankpe...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

bankpe...@googlegroups.com

Google Groups

Topic digest
View all topics

• Missing clauses in Pension Regulation - 4 Updates
• Civil Appeal No.7993 of 2023 – Late M C Singla(Dead) through LRs & Ors. Vs. Union of India and connected matters – Arguments held on 22.07.2026 - 1 Update
• AICPIN (IW) 2016=100 FOR JUNE '26- INCREASE OF L47 SLABS - 2 Updates
• "Pension and additional pension, wherever applicable, shall be updated" the amended BEPR clause no. 35(1) was put before ChatGPT for grammatical interpretation and was replied as per attachment. - 1 Update
• AIBRF OB's MEET - 1 Update

Missing clauses in Pension Regulation

Srinivasan Badri <sriniva...@gmail.com>: Aug 04 09:07PM -0400 The observation that RBI has revised/ not updated , whatever way it may be called the out come of benefits are same. People used say Call me “ but pay me Forty” call me in any way but give what I am entitled to!??   On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 9:02 PM Srinivasan Badri <sriniva...@gmail.com> wrote:

Srinivasan Badri <sriniva...@gmail.com>: Aug 04 09:02PM -0400 Yes. A general common sense approach equity of justice is the main basis for our fight and let us hope for the best. The exact wording of pension regulations clause 35(1) with annnexure1 and the amendment become irrelevant if it is so. How the Pnb is going to defend ?   On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 6:33 AM 'Satyanarayana Rao' via bankpensioner <

Srinivasan Badri <sriniva...@gmail.com>: Aug 04 09:16PM -0400 Considering the many elite learned veterans of this August body of lions without teeth ( including myself) it is like an very old lion unable to hunt making roaring sound by pressing its mouth on the earth and the sound vibration being all over the forest, some goats lambs shamble across running here and there in all directions , it happens that one or two may fall on the open mouth of the hungry Lion. Here lions are roaring!! Waiting for a prey!! Fantastic destiny.   On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 6:33 AM 'Satyanarayana Rao' via bankpensioner <

JSOMA SHEKARA <jsomase...@gmail.com>: Aug 04 05:27PM +0530 Hon.Hon. Judges of the SC in Civil Appeal 7993/23 posed a question to both petitioners' and respondents' advocates: What is your interpretation of Reg 35/1? Both Dhruv Mehta and the Pensioners' advocates have given their interpretations, Therefore, the Hon'ble Judges will issue their final legal interpretation. We can support the IBA or pensioners as per our pre disposition of the issue. I will better wait for the judges' verdict instead of giving my legal opinion.     On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 4:03 PM 'Satyanarayana Rao' via bankpensioner <

Back to top

Civil Appeal No.7993 of 2023 – Late M C Singla(Dead) through LRs & Ors. Vs. Union of India and connected matters – Arguments held on 22.07.2026

Prasad C N <cn_pr...@yahoo.com>: Aug 04 12:04PM Dear Shri Sathyanarayana Raoji, We have carefully gone through your emails in whichyou continue to invoke Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Youhave also expressed confidence that the final verdict will be in our favour,based on the principles of natural justice, jurisprudence, equity and equalitybefore the law.   Without entering into the question of theapplicability of these constitutional provisions to the Singla case, maywe request you to enlighten us on a different but equally important issue.   Why are these very same constitutional principles notbeing applied within the banking industry itself, particularly among the PublicSector Banks?   Workmen and Officers across these banks perform thesame or substantially similar functions. Many of us were recruited through thevery same recruitment process. We belong to the same banking industry, arerepresented by the same Apex Organisations, and are governed by the sameBipartite Settlements and Joint Notes.   If that is so, why is there discrimination? Why isthere no equity or equality? Why are the principles of natural justiceconspicuously absent within our own industry?   If equality before the law is the governing principle,what prevents us from demanding equal treatment for all bank pensioners? Morespecifically, what prevents us from demanding compensation, in the form ofpension revision, for retirees of banks other than the State Bank of India,so as to remove the disparity that has persisted for decades?   We seek an answer not only from you, but from all ofus. Why are we not collectively raising our voice to demand equal treatmentwithin the banking industry? Should bank pensioners and retirees themselvesadvocate differential treatment for one section while remaining silent aboutdiscrimination against another?   Perhaps, the silence on this issue speaks louder thanwords.   Thanks, a Million.    With regards,   Prasad C N     On Tuesday, 4 August 2026 at 04:03:57 pm IST, 'Satyanarayana Rao' via bankpensioner <bankpe...@googlegroups.com> wrote: The naration that the pension will take place through legal and bipartite negotiation in 13 th. Bipartite settlement is not the subject matter of Sri Singla ji Case. The debate is about pending pension updation case before supreme court which on fast track for final verdict which is going to be in our favour based on the principles of Natural justice and jurisprudence and equity and equality of law under article 14 and16 and 21 of the constitution of India. The judges shall exercise their constitutional authority to restore justice and apply their jurisdiction and jurisprudence and deliver the judgement in favour of petitioners. Let us wait for final verdict.   Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 at 9:37, 'Prasad C N' via bankpensioner<bankpe...@googlegroups.com> wrote: Dear friends, We are attaching a copy of the Circular of State Bank of Mysore Pensioners' Commune regarding proceedings in Singla's case on 22.07.2026. Thanks, a Million.  With regards,Prasad C N   -- Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/150207759.2036732.1785650319520%40mail.yahoo.com.   -- Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/1055571685.2022531.1785836363801%40mail.yahoo.com.

Back to top

AICPIN (IW) 2016=100 FOR JUNE '26- INCREASE OF L47 SLABS

jitendra gandhi <gandhiji...@gmail.com>: Aug 04 05:00PM +0530 Excellent link

Srinivasan Rajagopalan <s.rajag...@gmail.com>: Aug 04 07:31PM +0530 Thank you for the DR calculator     -- s.rajagopalan

Back to top

"Pension and additional pension, wherever applicable, shall be updated" the amended BEPR clause no. 35(1) was put before ChatGPT for grammatical interpretation and was replied as per attachment.

Srinivasan Badri <sriniva...@gmail.com>: Aug 04 03:03PM -0400 Many believe that annexure 1 should have been updated in every bipartite settlement as the emphatic wordsshall and formulae ( as amended in 2003, a decade after 1993 pensioners regulations.and more over the period 1986 and 1993 retired are already done before amendment came in 2003. It therefore implies for future Retirees as well from time to time. The absence of formulae being added for various Bipartite covered Retirees is an administrative error!!?? So wherever applicable in the clause is presumed as every Bipartite !!! The present question hangs on whether there is perpetuity indication of the amendment?? The judges have called for affidavits on the stand of Pnb with all supporting evidence of various Bipartite settlements office notes etc So we are trying to stand on a flimsy support needing structural restrengthening!!?? Let the judges take the view of the petitioners on equity law of justice and decree in our favor at least prospectively. On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 6:33 AM 'Satyanarayana Rao' via bankpensioner <

Back to top

AIBRF OB's MEET

Srinivasan Badri <sriniva...@gmail.com>: Aug 04 11:30AM -0400 If BMS has got good access to MOF and getting things done for RBI retirees and have askedAIRBF ( paper tiger) to join why this AirbF is reluctant. We are interested in favourable results only On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 6:33 AM 'Satyanarayana Rao' via bankpensioner <

Back to top

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.