Sub judice does not prevent the parties from negotiating or reaching an amicable settlement.
On the contrary, parties to pending litigation are free to explore an out-of-court settlement, often
with the assistance of their lawyers, and courts encourage such resolution. The concept of sub judice
primarily concerns public discussion or interference with matters pending before a court; it does not
prohibit the parties themselves from privately resolving their dispute. Therefore, merely stating that the
matter is “sub judice” cannot, by itself, be a valid reason to refuse or avoid settlement discussions.
If the unions invoke sub judice for an amicable settlement, it is an evasive plea to resolve the issue.
It reasonably raises the doubt that they are unwilling to pursue an out-of-court resolution. Every
retiree knew this.
-M.Venkateswarlu