PAYMENT OF ' LEAVE ENCASHMENT TO CR EMPLOYEES

[Vinay Kumar Khanna]

ISSUE: PAYMENT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT ON COMPULSORY RETIREMENT--IBA CIRCULAR VIS-A-VIS SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS                                       

Banks had been paying Leave Encashment on Compulsory Retirement cases up to Nov2000.Based on IBA Circular No PD/CIR/76/H7/E9/1452 dated 27th Nov2000, Banks stopped this facility to Compulsory retired officers except SBI who continued to pay leave encashment in spite of IBA circular.

Subsequently Mr. Deepak Sapra, a Compulsory Retired Officer of PNB  filed a writ petition (LPA 693/2013) in Delhi High Court which permitted the payment of leave encashment in compulsory retirement cases treating it one of the  classes  of retirement on 18.9.2013.Similar cases were filed by officers of Canara bank (three) OBC (one) & Syndicate bank (one).

Later on SIX SLPs have been filed by Canara Bank (three) SLP(C)28315/2011, 26623/2011&30252/2011, OBC(one)  30425/2011;PNB(one)SLP 35937/2013 & Syndicate bank (one) SLP 9722/2014 SLPs  in Supreme Court challenging the decision of various High Court.

In between IBA also took cognizance of cases filed in Courts and came up with  revised guidelines to pay leave encashment in compulsory retirement cases vide Circular HR&IR /76/H7 /E9/755 dated 11th May,15 amending the earlier instructions given in the year 2000, giving complete background & permitting Leave encashment wef 30Apr,2015.Based on IBA circular almost all Banks issued their respective circulars for payment of leave encashment wef 30Apr 2015.

 Subsequent to issuance of guidelines by IBA on 11.05.2015, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed the above referred Six SLPs of PNB, Canara bank, OBC & Syndicate Bank on 25.8.2015, the issue of payment of leave encashment to compulsorily retired officers has reached to finality.

After aforesaid Supreme Court Judgment dated 25^th Aug 2015, we understand that Punjab National Bank has taken up the matter with IBA who advised them to decide the matter at their end. Accordingly, the Punjab National Bank issued circular no HRD  730 dated 11.12.2015(copy enclosed) for payment of leave encashment to compulsorily retired officer retired between 27.11.2000 to 30 04.2015.PNB has also issued instructions to pay interest for the period from the date of compulsory retirement to the date of payment @ 10% pa (simple).

UCO Bank has also issued a circular dt 4 June 2016 allowing payment of Leave Encashment to all Compulsorily retired during the period 27.11.2000 to 29.04.2015 quoting IBA letter dt 27jan 2016advising that the decision to extend the benefit to the employees who were compulsorily retired before 30.04.2015 may be taken at their individual bank level. BOB has also issued similarly instructions, but unlike PNB both these banks are not paying interest for the intervening period.NOn payment of interest by these banks is also resulting in multiple litigation in various high courts.   

The National Litigation Policy clearly stipulate that once the Supreme Court decided the issue, all Public Sector Undertakings should take cognizance and implement the same for similarly place issues and avoid unnecessary litigation & hardship to the aggrieved officers. Here the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clubbed & dismissed all the Six Writ Petitions of four different banks against the decision of different high courts in favour of compulsorily retired officials. It is worthwhile to mention that after the Supreme Court judgment, the Delhi High Court permitted payment of leave encashment in compulsory retirement case of Mr. P.K Jain Vs PNB LPA 607/2013 quoting the aforesaid Supreme Court judgment.

HOWEVER, SOME OF THE BANKS LIKE CANARA BANK, IOB, P&SB, INDIAN BANK, ANDHRA BANK  & MANY OTHER BANKS  ARE STILL DENYING THE PAYMENT &INTEREST FOR THE DELAYED PERIOD  TO COMPULSORY EMPLOYEES.

Regards

V.K Khanna

493, sector 27, Gurgaon 122002.

9958125544

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 9:52 AM, premchand jaswal <pcja...@gmail.com> wrote:

Sir,

       No attachment found. Pl reload.

Thanks

P.C.Jaswal

On 28 October 2016 at 18:25, Vinay Kumar Khanna <vkkhan...@gmail.com> wrote:

Pl  see attachment

--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensioner+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bankpensioner.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[KUNAL SINGH KHARAYAT]

Sir, interest is a secondary issue, most of the banks are not paying leave encashment dues. Their is no uniformity in payment of leave encashment due by all banks.  A few banks have made the payment.  This is something very serious sans remedy.

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:20, Vinay Kumar Khanna

<vkkhan...@gmail.com> wrote:

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.

[Ramesh Sehgal]

Respected our Worthy Prime Minister Shri Narender Modi,

Pl see the folliwng mail of Shri Vinay Kumar Khanna which is self-explanatory.

Sir, It is very strange to know that when on the advice of Indian Banks Association, Punjab National Bank, UCO Bank and Bank of Baroda have started paying Leave Encashment to Bank Officers who retired compulsorily in between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015 then why other nationalised banks like Canara Bank, etc. are not paying Leave Encashment to such officer.

We request your highness to look into the matter personally and take up the matter with the concerned authorities in the Indian Banks' Association and Ministry of Finance to get issue requisite instructions to the left over Banks for implementation of the scheme of payment of Leave Encashment to the left over bank officers who retired compulsorily in between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015.

There should not be discremination in implementing the instructions of IBA.

We look forward to your High Office with great hope for giving instructions to Indian Bank Association for payment of Leave Encashment to the left-over hapless senior Bank Officers who retired compulsorily between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015.

Thanks and regards.

Ramesh Sehgal

91-9990217028

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.

[Ramesh Sehgal]

The Secretary,

Banking Division,

Deptt of Ministry of Finance,

Pl Street, New Delhi.

Respected Madam,

The following mail of Shri Vinay Kumar Khanna is self-explanatory.

It is very strange to know that when on the advice of Indian Banks Association, Punjab National Bank, UCO Bank and Bank of Baroda have started paying Leave Encashment to Bank Officers who retired compulsorily in between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015 then why other nationalised banks like Canara Bank, etc. are not paying Leave Encashment to such officer.

We request your highness to look into the matter personally and take up the matter with the concerned authorities in the Indian Banks' Association to get issue requisite instructions to the left over Banks for implementation of the scheme of payment of Leave Encashment to the left over bank officers who retired compulsorily in between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015.

There should not be discremination in implementing the instructions of IBA.

We look forward to your High Office with great hope for taking action for payment of Leave Encashment to hapless Bank Officers who retired compulsorily between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015.

Thanks and regards.

Ramesh Sehgal

91-9990217028

IBA is required to issue instructions to all left over banks and when the instructions of IBA  is not implemented by the left over banks, stringent action be taken against these Banks.

There should not be discremination in implementing the instructions of IBA.

Will IBA look into the matter and will see that all other Compulsory Retired Officers gets payment of Leave Encashment with interest for delayed period.

Regards.

Ramesh Sehgal

91-9990217028

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Vinay Kumar Khanna <vkkhan...@gmail.com>
To: premchand jaswal <pcja...@gmail.com>
Cc: bankpensioner <bankpe...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, 29 October 2016 11:20 AM
Subject: bankpensioner PAYMENT OF ' LEAVE ENCASHMENT TO CR EMPLOYEES

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.

[Ramesh Sehgal]

The Chairman,

Indian Banks' Association, Mumbai.

Dear Sir,

The following mail of Shri Vinay Kumar Khanna is self-explanatory.

It is very strange to know that when on your advice, Punjab National Bank, UCO Bank and Bank of Baroda have started paying Leave Encashment to Bank Officers who retired compulsorily in between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015 then why other nationalised banks like Canara Bank, etc. are not paying Leave Encashment to such officer.

IBA is required to issue instructions to all left over banks and when the instructions of IBA  is not implemented by the left over banks, stringent action be taken against these Banks.

There should not be discremination in implementing the instructions of IBA.

Will IBA look into the matter and will see that all other Compulsory Retired Officers gets payment of Leave Encashment with interest for delayed period.

Regards.

Ramesh Sehgal

91-9990217028

From: Vinay Kumar Khanna <vkkhan...@gmail.com>
To: premchand jaswal <pcja...@gmail.com>
Cc: bankpensioner <bankpe...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, 29 October 2016 11:20 AM
Subject: bankpensioner PAYMENT OF ' LEAVE ENCASHMENT TO CR EMPLOYEES

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.

[KUNAL SINGH KHARAYAT]

Many banks are not paying to leftover cases of CRS despite reminders. All banks can implement only when there is a circular from IBA as in the case of others.  There should be some base for payment.

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

[Ramesh Sehgal]

Dear Sir,

When IBA has permitted Punjab National Bank, UCO Bank and Bank of Baroda for making payment of Leave Encashment to officers retired compulsorily between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015, then why IBA is not giving instructions to the other left-over Bank such as Canara Bank and others to make payment of Leave Encashment to officers retired compulsorily between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015.

What was the base of payment of Leave Encashment to such officers in case of PNB, UCO Bank and Bank of Baroda, the same base can be for payment of Leave Encashment in the left-over banks.

Regards.

Ramesh Sehgal

91-9990217028

---

From: 'KUNAL SINGH KHARAYAT' via bankpensioner <bankpe...@googlegroups.com>
To: "bankpe...@googlegroups.com" <bankpe...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, 31 October 2016 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: bankpensioner PAYMENT OF ' LEAVE ENCASHMENT TO CR EMPLOYEES

[JSOMA SHEKARA]

Mr.Ramesh sehgal

Please enlighten me under which Act  whether Banking Regulation Act or Employees Pension Regulation Act Banks are required to take permission of IBA to give any benefit to its employees. Has Central Govt passed any order that PSU Banks must take prior permission of IBA before extending any benefit to its Employees/Retirees.

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:14 PM, 'Ramesh Sehgal' via bankpensioner <bankpe...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Dear Sir,

When IBA has permitted Punjab National Bank, UCO Bank and Bank of Baroda for making payment of Leave Encashment to officers retired compulsorily between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015, then why IBA is not giving instructions to the other left-over Bank such as Canara Bank and others to make payment of Leave Encashment to officers retired compulsorily between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015.

What was the base of payment of Leave Encashment to such officers in case of PNB, UCO Bank and Bank of Baroda, the same base can be for payment of Leave Encashment in the left-over banks.

Regards.

Ramesh Sehgal

91-9990217028

---

From: 'KUNAL SINGH KHARAYAT' via bankpensioner <bankpensioner@googlegroups.com>
To: "bankpensioner@googlegroups.com" <bankpensioner@googlegroups.com>

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensioner+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bankpensioner.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensioner+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bankpensioner.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensioner+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

[Vinay Kumar Khanna]

IBA should have withdrawn their circular of 2000 which the court have ruled has no legal validity & hence can not be relied upon.By leave the decision to invidual bank on payment of leave encashment to individual banks IBA has created more confusion then it has solved. Pnb is paying interest for the intervening period whereas neither bob nor uco is paying interest for the period this futher creates confusion . When Govt & IBA are thinking of merger how can they have different interpetation of the same service regulations

[Ashok Chander Sharma]

Sir,

I shall appreciate if you kindly give your valuable comments on my following post in face book. I also seek your valuable guidance  regarding the course of action in the matter.

Ashok Chander Sharma
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

2nd Pension Option - Left over resignee/CRS/dismissed bankers
I give here below excerpts from Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s address at the 50th anniversary of Delhi High Court on 31st October, 2016

अनुभव के आधार रोडमैप तैयार करें - प्रधान मंत्री !

ज्यादातर ज्यूडिशरी का अधिकतम समय हम लोगों के पीछे जाता है, मतलब की मोदी में नहीं ,सरकार में ! सब से बड़ा लिटिगेंट सरकार होती है ! हर मसले पे सरकार भिड़ती रहती है ! मैं कभी हमारी सरकार के लोगों को कहता हूँ कि भाई एक टीचर अपने हक़ के लिए गया कोर्ट में, उस को न्याय मिला वो जीत गया ! उसी प्रकार के दस हज़ार टीचर के मसले लटके पड़े हैं, उसको आधार बना के दस हज़ार को पूरा करो न ! आप ज्यूडिशरी में बोझ क्यूँ बड़ा रहे हो ! लेकिन पता नहीं उनके दिमाग कभी बदले न ! उनको लगता है कि वो इनडिविजुअल मसला था और कानून के दायरे में उस इंडिविजुअल के मसले को हम किसी को फिट नहीं कर सकते ! पता नहीं मैं इन सब बारीकियों को तो नहीं जानता, पर मैं समझा रहा हूँ की हम इस बोझ को कम कैसे करें !
There are judgements by Supreme Court of India and various high courts against different banks, namely Andhra Bank, Vijaya Bank, Canara Bank, Punjab and Sind Bank, Punjab National Bank, U.Co. Bank,Union Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, etc. for payment of pension to CRS, Resignees and others. However, the benefit of the judgements has been given to the litigants only. There are several verdicts, all similarly placed persons need not go to court for relief, they should be given relief without going to court.
Government and its various agencies are the pre-dominant litigants in courts and Tribunals in the country. Its aim is to transform Government into an Efficient and Responsible litigant. This policy is also based on the recognition that it is the responsibility of the Government should protect and respect fundamental rights of citizens and those in charge of the conduct of Government litigation should never forget this basic principle. Government must cease to be a compulsive litigant. Government should reduce litigation in courts so that valuable court time would be spent in resolving other pending cases. Government and its agencies may be concerned with and also removing unnecessary Government cases. Prioritisation in litigation has to be achieved with particular emphasis on welfare legislation, social reform, weaker sections and senior citizens and other categories requiring assistance must be given utmost priority. The well known dictum is that no appeal should be filed in service matters.
Therefore, this is the time when UFBU and retirees’s organizations should strongly take up the issue with PMO, MOF and Minister of Law and Justice quoting prime minster/s address on the occasion of golden jublee celebrations of Delhi High Court. It should be ensured that 2nd Pension Option is made available to all the left over bankers, whether they are resignees, VRS optees, CRS etc. Courts have already shown the way, and we see no reason to exclude any category. All these people should be entitled to get the pension from the cut off date as per 9th BPS itself.
Ashok Chander Sharma

---

From: bankpe...@googlegroups.com <bankpe...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Vinay Kumar Khanna <vkkhan...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 6:50 AM
To: bankpensioner

Subject: Re: bankpensioner PAYMENT OF ' LEAVE ENCASHMENT TO CR EMPLOYEES

IBA should have withdrawn their circular of 2000 which the court have ruled  has no legal validity & hence can not be relied upon.By leave the decision to invidual bank on payment of leave encashment to individual banks IBA has created more confusion then it has solved. Pnb is paying interest for the intervening period whereas neither bob nor uco is paying interest for the period this futher creates confusion . When Govt & IBA are thinking of merger how can they have different interpetation of the same service regulations

[premchand jaswal]

Dear Friends,

                     This is what I have been stressing upon for the last more than a year. Mr. Dilip Saha ,General Secretary of AIPNBOA wrote  a letter to the CMD of Punjab National Bank on 26.07.2016 but there appears no follow up of the same . There is no information as to the steps taken up by the retiree leaders in this regard., Now when the Prime Minister of the country is convinced that decision of the Supreme Court of India should be made applicable to all the affected parties and not only to the litigants why IBA authorities and bank managements are not considering this aspect? This reflects that IBA & Bank Managements are above Supreme Court of India as well as Prime Minister. IBA has already allowed pension to CRS workmen through their circular dated 23.12.2015. The IBA cannot differentiate between workmen & Officers as the disciplinary procedure as well as punishment for both the categories is the same. Two parameters cannot be applied in the same organization . What prohibits them to make these instructions applicable to retired OFFICERS? Our leaders should awake from their slumber and take appropriate steps so that the officers belonging to CRS category may get their due share of pension during their life. Almost all CRS officers are senior citizens and many may leave this world at any time. I fully support Mr. Ashok Sharma in this regard.
 

P.C.Jaswal
9915486255

On 2 November 2016 at 13:17, Ashok Chander Sharma <asho...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Sir,

I shall appreciate if you kindly give your valuable comments on my following post in face book. I also seek your valuable guidance  regarding the course of action in the matter.

Ashok Chander Sharma
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

2nd Pension Option - Left over resignee/CRS/dismissed bankers
I give here below excerpts from Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s address at the 50th anniversary of Delhi High Court on 31st October, 2016

अनुभव के आधार रोडमैप तैयार करें - प्रधान मंत्री !

ज्यादातर ज्यूडिशरी का अधिकतम समय हम लोगों के पीछे जाता है, मतलब की मोदी में नहीं ,सरकार में ! सब से बड़ा लिटिगेंट सरकार होती है ! हर मसले पे सरकार भिड़ती रहती है ! मैं कभी हमारी सरकार के लोगों को कहता हूँ कि भाई एक टीचर अपने हक़ के लिए गया कोर्ट में, उस को न्याय मिला वो जीत गया ! उसी प्रकार के दस हज़ार टीचर के मसले लटके पड़े हैं, उसको आधार बना के दस हज़ार को पूरा करो न ! आप ज्यूडिशरी में बोझ क्यूँ बड़ा रहे हो ! लेकिन पता नहीं उनके दिमाग कभी बदले न ! उनको लगता है कि वो इनडिविजुअल मसला था और कानून के दायरे में उस इंडिविजुअल के मसले को हम किसी को फिट नहीं कर सकते ! पता नहीं मैं इन सब बारीकियों को तो नहीं जानता, पर मैं समझा रहा हूँ की हम इस बोझ को कम कैसे करें !
There are judgements by Supreme Court of India and various high courts against different banks, namely Andhra Bank, Vijaya Bank, Canara Bank, Punjab and Sind Bank, Punjab National Bank, U.Co. Bank,Union Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, etc. for payment of pension to CRS, Resignees and others. However, the benefit of the judgements has been given to the litigants only. There are several verdicts, all similarly placed persons need not go to court for relief, they should be given relief without going to court.
Government and its various agencies are the pre-dominant litigants in courts and Tribunals in the country. Its aim is to transform Government into an Efficient and Responsible litigant. This policy is also based on the recognition that it is the responsibility of the Government should protect and respect fundamental rights of citizens and those in charge of the conduct of Government litigation should never forget this basic principle. Government must cease to be a compulsive litigant. Government should reduce litigation in courts so that valuable court time would be spent in resolving other pending cases. Government and its agencies may be concerned with and also removing unnecessary Government cases. Prioritisation in litigation has to be achieved with particular emphasis on welfare legislation, social reform, weaker sections and senior citizens and other categories requiring assistance must be given utmost priority. The well known dictum is that no appeal should be filed in service matters.
Therefore, this is the time when UFBU and retirees’s organizations should strongly take up the issue with PMO, MOF and Minister of Law and Justice quoting prime minster/s address on the occasion of golden jublee celebrations of Delhi High Court. It should be ensured that 2nd Pension Option is made available to all the left over bankers, whether they are resignees, VRS optees, CRS etc. Courts have already shown the way, and we see no reason to exclude any category. All these people should be entitled to get the pension from the cut off date as per 9th BPS itself.
Ashok Chander Sharma

---

From: bankpe...@googlegroups.com <bankpensioner@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Vinay Kumar Khanna <vkkhan...@gmail.com>

Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 6:50 AM
To: bankpensioner
Subject: Re: bankpensioner PAYMENT OF ' LEAVE ENCASHMENT TO CR EMPLOYEES

IBA should have withdrawn their circular of 2000 which the court have ruled  has no legal validity & hence can not be relied upon.By leave the decision to invidual bank on payment of leave encashment to individual banks IBA has created more confusion then it has solved. Pnb is paying interest for the intervening period whereas neither bob nor uco is paying interest for the period this futher creates confusion . When Govt & IBA are thinking of merger how can they have different interpetation of the same service regulations

--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensioner+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bankpensioner.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensioner+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

[Suresh Multani]

Dear Sir
If I had opted special VRS in 2001,
I would have got the pension option offer from Bank,
Even tho I was PF optee.
Suresh Multani
UBI
Resignee.
Worked 32 years and resign on medical grounds.

On Nov 6, 2016 9:10 AM, "premchand jaswal" <pcja...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Friends,

                     This is what I have been stressing upon for the last more than a year. Mr. Dilip Saha ,General Secretary of AIPNBOA wrote  a letter to the CMD of Punjab National Bank on 26.07.2016 but there appears no follow up of the same . There is no information as to the steps taken up by the retiree leaders in this regard., Now when the Prime Minister of the country is convinced that decision of the Supreme Court of India should be made applicable to all the affected parties and not only to the litigants why IBA authorities and bank managements are not considering this aspect? This reflects that IBA & Bank Managements are above Supreme Court of India as well as Prime Minister. IBA has already allowed pension to CRS workmen through their circular dated 23.12.2015. The IBA cannot differentiate between workmen & Officers as the disciplinary procedure as well as punishment for both the categories is the same. Two parameters cannot be applied in the same organization . What prohibits them to make these instructions applicable to retired OFFICERS? Our leaders should awake from their slumber and take appropriate steps so that the officers belonging to CRS category may get their due share of pension during their life. Almost all CRS officers are senior citizens and many may leave this world at any time. I fully support Mr. Ashok Sharma in this regard.
 

P.C.Jaswal
9915486255

On 2 November 2016 at 13:17, Ashok Chander Sharma <asho...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Sir,

I shall appreciate if you kindly give your valuable comments on my following post in face book. I also seek your valuable guidance  regarding the course of action in the matter.

Ashok Chander Sharma
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

2nd Pension Option - Left over resignee/CRS/dismissed bankers
I give here below excerpts from Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s address at the 50th anniversary of Delhi High Court on 31st October, 2016

अनुभव के आधार रोडमैप तैयार करें - प्रधान मंत्री !

ज्यादातर ज्यूडिशरी का अधिकतम समय हम लोगों के पीछे जाता है, मतलब की मोदी में नहीं ,सरकार में ! सब से बड़ा लिटिगेंट सरकार होती है ! हर मसले पे सरकार भिड़ती रहती है ! मैं कभी हमारी सरकार के लोगों को कहता हूँ कि भाई एक टीचर अपने हक़ के लिए गया कोर्ट में, उस को न्याय मिला वो जीत गया ! उसी प्रकार के दस हज़ार टीचर के मसले लटके पड़े हैं, उसको आधार बना के दस हज़ार को पूरा करो न ! आप ज्यूडिशरी में बोझ क्यूँ बड़ा रहे हो ! लेकिन पता नहीं उनके दिमाग कभी बदले न ! उनको लगता है कि वो इनडिविजुअल मसला था और कानून के दायरे में उस इंडिविजुअल के मसले को हम किसी को फिट नहीं कर सकते ! पता नहीं मैं इन सब बारीकियों को तो नहीं जानता, पर मैं समझा रहा हूँ की हम इस बोझ को कम कैसे करें !
There are judgements by Supreme Court of India and various high courts against different banks, namely Andhra Bank, Vijaya Bank, Canara Bank, Punjab and Sind Bank, Punjab National Bank, U.Co. Bank,Union Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, etc. for payment of pension to CRS, Resignees and others. However, the benefit of the judgements has been given to the litigants only. There are several verdicts, all similarly placed persons need not go to court for relief, they should be given relief without going to court.
Government and its various agencies are the pre-dominant litigants in courts and Tribunals in the country. Its aim is to transform Government into an Efficient and Responsible litigant. This policy is also based on the recognition that it is the responsibility of the Government should protect and respect fundamental rights of citizens and those in charge of the conduct of Government litigation should never forget this basic principle. Government must cease to be a compulsive litigant. Government should reduce litigation in courts so that valuable court time would be spent in resolving other pending cases. Government and its agencies may be concerned with and also removing unnecessary Government cases. Prioritisation in litigation has to be achieved with particular emphasis on welfare legislation, social reform, weaker sections and senior citizens and other categories requiring assistance must be given utmost priority. The well known dictum is that no appeal should be filed in service matters.
Therefore, this is the time when UFBU and retirees’s organizations should strongly take up the issue with PMO, MOF and Minister of Law and Justice quoting prime minster/s address on the occasion of golden jublee celebrations of Delhi High Court. It should be ensured that 2nd Pension Option is made available to all the left over bankers, whether they are resignees, VRS optees, CRS etc. Courts have already shown the way, and we see no reason to exclude any category. All these people should be entitled to get the pension from the cut off date as per 9th BPS itself.
Ashok Chander Sharma

---

From: bankpe...@googlegroups.com <bankpe...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Vinay Kumar Khanna <vkkhan...@gmail.com>

[Gangaadhar Oguri]

sir,

My name is gangadhar

worked for andhra bank from 1983 to 2004. 

given crs for a small amount of difference.

I have accumulated 11 months leave balance.

pl guide me how to claim my leave encashement.

regards,

gangadhar

gangaad...@gmail.com

9225108810

Mumbai

Pl  see attachment

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.

[Gangaadhar Oguri]

good afternoon sir, My name is gangadhar ex andhra bank. I worked in andhra bank from 1983 to 2004. i was given crs for small mistake. at that time i have accumulated leave balance of 11 months credit. but they did not give the leave encashment. also secondly I was not aware of the 2nd pension option. I have taken pf that time. can you guide me to proceed against the bank? pl help me

 gangadhar,

 mumbai

 9225108810

On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 9:21:33 AM UTC+5:30, JSOMA SHEKARA wrote:

Mr.Ramesh sehgal

Please enlighten me under which Act  whether Banking Regulation Act or Employees Pension Regulation Act Banks are required to take permission of IBA to give any benefit to its employees. Has Central Govt passed any order that PSU Banks must take prior permission of IBA before extending any benefit to its Employees/Retirees.

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:14 PM, 'Ramesh Sehgal' via bankpensioner <bankpe...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Dear Sir,

When IBA has permitted Punjab National Bank, UCO Bank and Bank of Baroda for making payment of Leave Encashment to officers retired compulsorily between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015, then why IBA is not giving instructions to the other left-over Bank such as Canara Bank and others to make payment of Leave Encashment to officers retired compulsorily between 27.11.2000 to 30.04.2015.

What was the base of payment of Leave Encashment to such officers in case of PNB, UCO Bank and Bank of Baroda, the same base can be for payment of Leave Encashment in the left-over banks.

Regards.

Ramesh Sehgal

91-9990217028

---

From: 'KUNAL SINGH KHARAYAT' via bankpensioner <bankpe...@googlegroups.com>
To: "bankpe...@googlegroups.com" <bankpe...@googlegroups.com>

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bankpensioner.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.

[Ashok Chander Sharma]

Dear friends,

Has Allahabad Bank issued circular for payment of leave encashment to compulsory retired officers ? If yes, can anybody give the reference of the circular.

Ashok Chander Sharma

---

From: bankpe...@googlegroups.com <bankpe...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Gangaadhar Oguri <ogr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 4:32 PM
To: bankpensioner
Cc: pcja...@gmail.com
Subject: bankpensioner Re: PAYMENT OF ' LEAVE ENCASHMENT TO CR EMPLOYEES