- REFORMS IN BPS - 1 Update
- Check this out from The Times of India - 1 Update
- Updation case Date 17/12 To 14/01/26 so for not confirmed - 2 Updates
- Updation - 1 Update
- NON SUBMISSION OF LIFE CERTIFICATE AND WITHHOLDING PENSION - 1 Update
JSOMA SHEKARA <jsomase...@gmail.com>: Dec 16 02:39PM +0530
DFS is introducing many reforms in the Banking Industry but what is
urgently required is reforms in the Bipartite negotiations shortly called
BPS. The significant characteristics of Bipartite negotiations is
negotiations directly between management and Unions. In the Banking
Industry management refuses to deal directly with union and retirees and a
third party is dealing with Unions. How this can be called Bipartite
negotiations.
The current bipartite negotiation process for wage and pension revision in
the Indian banking industry, while historically a stable mechanism,
requires significant improvements and reforms, primarily to ensure
fairness, transparency, and timely resolution of critical issues,
especially concerning pensioners
.
Key Areas for Improvement and Reform
- *Pension Updation and Parity*: A major point of contention is the lack
of a consistent and automatic pension revision mechanism linked to wage
revisions, unlike the Central Government's Pay Commission system or the
Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) model. The current system often results in a
significant disparity between the pensions of early retirees and those
retiring after subsequent settlements.
- *Reform Needed*: Implement a mandatory, formula-based periodic
pension updation (e.g., on RBI lines) as a statutory provision within the
Pension Regulations, ensuring that basic pension keeps pace with
inflation
and subsequent wage hikes. This would provide financial security
and "Right
to dignity" for all pensioners, a right upheld by the Supreme Court.
- *Negotiation Timeliness*: Wage settlements often face protracted
negotiations, leading to significant delays in implementation (e.g., the
11th Bipartite Settlement was implemented years after its effective date).
- *Reform Needed*: Establish strict timelines and a clear framework
for the negotiation process between the Indian Banks'
Association (IBA) and
unions to ensure settlements are finalized and implemented promptly,
ideally within the five-year cycle they are meant to cover.
- *Inclusion and Representation*: Pensioner associations often argue
they are not adequately represented in the main bipartite talks between the
IBA and working employee unions (UFBU), leading to their issues being
sidelined or addressed as "residual issues".
- *Reform Needed*: Create a formal, inclusive mechanism to involve
legitimate pensioner representatives in discussions concerning retirement
benefits to ensure their grievances are addressed directly and not as an
afterthought.
- *Transparency and Authority*: The IBA, a voluntary association,
handles negotiations for all public sector banks, and the legal force of
"Joint Notes" or Memoranda of Understanding is sometimes questioned in
court.
- *Reform Needed*: Formalize the legal standing of the negotiated
settlements and consider an independent, dedicated "Banking Pay
Commission"
to bring transparency, impartiality, and a consistent, legally binding
framework for salary/pension revisions, similar to the Central Pay
Commission for government employees.
- *Scope and Consistency*: The settlements should cover all applicable
banks (public, private, and foreign) uniformly where the pension scheme is
applicable, to avoid disparities and legal challenges.
- *Reform Needed*: Ensure consistent application of agreed-upon terms
across all signatory banks and work with the government to address
regulatory differences that currently create ad-hoc solutions like
ex-gratia payments instead of a permanent pension revision.
Implementing these reforms would lead to a more harmonious industrial
relations environment, improved employee morale (both working and retired),
and greater stability within the critical Indian banking sector.
RAMANI NV <ramani...@gmail.com>: Dec 16 12:00PM +0530
SC full court rolls back hikes given by CJIs to select few
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sc-full-court-rolls-back-hikes-given-by-cjis-to-select-few/articleshow/125965805.cms?utm_source=app&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=social_share
Download the TOI app now:
https://timesofindia.onelink.me/mjFd/toisupershare
SUMAN KUMAR Suman <suman...@gmail.com>: Dec 15 08:41PM +0530
IF ITS MAY 2 2026 ANY PROBLEM ? LISTEN TO BLOGGERS REGARDING
CASE BYE
--
*suman.*
JSOMA SHEKARA <jsomase...@gmail.com>: Dec 15 07:04PM +0530
First of all this 14.01.26 report is fake and nowhere officially it is
mentioned as it is a holiday.
The fact remains that opportunity was knocking on the door on 10.12.2025
and we did not open the door.
JSOMA SHEKARA <jsomase...@gmail.com>: Dec 15 06:57PM +0530
It is alleged that In both LIC updation case and M C Singhla case some
unknown hands are controlling the situation. So it seems.
LIC updation case was going in the right direction with a few weeks gap
between hearings.
On 12.11.2025 Hon.judges observed documents common compilation were
submitted without attaching documents.So Hon.judge appointed two advocates
on record for both sides, LIC management and Pensioners to collect fresh
compilation and written submissions within two weeks and posed the case for
final hearing on 03.12.2025. It is reported that Pensioner's side
submitted 4000 page submissions and documents within two weeks as directed
by the judge. But on 03.12.2025 to pensioners' surprise nearing was
adjourned to 04.02.2026 without any reason. Some unconfirmed youtube posts
suggest that LIC management, as advised by the union government, sought
long adjournment as it needs time obtain fresh actuary reports,
compilation of data. So the case adjourned to 04.02.2026. It may be noted
that SC will be closed for summer vacation from 01.06.2026 and will be
reopened on 13.07.2026. It seems one of the judges hearing the case is
going to retire on August 26 and after that a fresh bench is to be
constituted.
Usual practice is on the previous day of hearing date Advocates will have a
brief session with clients to discuss strategy to be adopted on the hearing
date. In M C Singhla's case on the most crucial date advocates were
absent. Latest brief from advocate Sri.Sevaram did not contain any mention
of 10.12.2025 proceedings. It is uncertain whether the M C Singla case will
be listed before summer holidays.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 4:33 PM Satish Kumar Khanna <sk.kha...@gmail.com>
wrote:
MOHAN P <moha...@gmail.com>: Dec 15 09:26PM +0530
For information:
This case -WP 405/2023 - decided before KHC relates to non payment of
monthly pension to a freedom fighter especially a centenarians, by bank
on account of non submission of Life Certificate on time.
Court verdict states that:
"The only issue is, whether non-submission of Life
Certificate for a brief period of one year could take away the right of
the petitioner to get pension in the peculiar facts.
Though
submission of Life Certificate is imperative in terms of the
guidelines and duty is cast on every pensioner to submit a Life
Certificate, certain duty is also cast upon the Bank officials as well.
The duty that is cast upon the Bank officials is that they should visit
a person whose Life Certificate has not come about immediately to
update their data with regard to restoration of pension or
otherwise. The duty of the Bank is given a go bye."
Read in full below:
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.
--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAK_8OKSUtgwRpF0HHmM%3DkTDBcrFB4HU4hWshHBhRxU66fVuzPA%40mail.gmail.com.
Mr. Sanjay j
I share your positive experience with the Jeevan Pramaan application for submitting my life certificate. As a super senior citizen, I've used it successfully for years without any problems. Confirmation is instant from the app and is typically received quickly from the bank.
While new users may find the initial registration process challenging, subsequent submissions are generally easier. The only slight hurdle is achieving successful face recognition. Despite that, this remains the superior method for submitting a life certificate, especially for seniors like myself.
KM.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAP9-UeLQ6is%2BhRLZD7iveiF9GspvTAoi4BZQqshCFwBHH9sTOQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAKGV8OyNsBC-9YmYRDXSoaH7SAnMfAgemxW-e4s7y-FP%2BiEgeg%40mail.gmail.com.