The Road Ahead – Thoughts Before the April 9th Hearing
Sanjay J
Friends,
As we stand just 48 hours away from the next hearing on April 9, 2026, anxiety is natural. However, some of our members' conclusions are based on preconceived notions rather than the legal reality unfolding in Court No. 2. What some see as the "end of the road" is, in fact, the beginning of a detailed judicial examination.
We are driving looking at the road ahead; they are focusing too long on the rear-view mirror.
1."It failed in HC, so it will fail in SC":
If the IBA’s technical objections were insurmountable, this case would have been "dismissed in limine" (at the threshold). The fact that the Supreme Court admitted the appeal, converted it into Civil Appeal 7993/2023, and has been hearing it substantively means the High Court’s dismissal is not the final word.
High Courts often stick to the "Letter of the Law." The Supreme Court exists to enforce the "Spirit of the Law" (Equity). Many landmark service matters in India succeeded in the SC only after a defeat in the HC. This is the first seed of optimism for us.
2. The Nakara Judgment & The "Math":
If M.C. Singla’s case were a "joke" or had "no prayer," the Bench would not be doing "math" with the IBA.
- Why did the SC ask for comparative charts for three specific retirement periods?
- Why are they scrutinizing the "multiplying factors"?
The Judges are no longer asking if it should be done, but how it should be calculated to ensure fairness. As seen in the excellent Excel sheet shared recently by our member, the "Formula" isn't a mystery—it is a logical staircase. We are asking the Court to interpret Regulation 35(1) in the spirit of the Nakara Judgment: that Pension is a "Deferred Wage," not a bounty.
3."Where is the Prayer?":
If there were "No Prayer," there would be "No Hearing." In a Civil Appeal, we carry forward the original prayer asking the SC to grant what the HC denied.
The prayer is simple: "Set aside the High Court order and Declare that Regulation 35(1) mandates Updation."
Once that Declaration is made, the math follows automatically as a matter of execution.
4. What do you mean by a "Favourable Verdict"?
Many think a favourable verdict means the Judge announcing "Pay everyone ₹38,000." That is not how Supreme Court judgments work.
A favourable verdict is a Declaratory Judgment that establishes the Right, from which the Money follows.
Specifically, we are expecting a verdict that declares:
- The "Mandate" of Reg 35(1): That the amendment changing "will" to "shall" in 2003 was not cosmetic but created a statutory obligation to update pension with every wage revision.
- Homogeneity: That dividing pensioners by date of retirement (e.g., Pre-2002 vs. Post-2002) for the purpose of "formula application" violates Article 14 (Equality), reaffirming the Nakara principle.
- The Mechanism: That the "Appendix-I" mentioned in the Regulation is not a static relic of 1987 but a dynamic template that must be refreshed (just like the RBI scheme).
In short: The Verdict gives us the "Key" (the Legal Right); the "Treasure" (the Arrears) is the automatic consequence of unlocking the door.
5. The Reality of April 9, 2026:
The real uncertainty is not the "Merit" of our
case, but the "Clock" of the Court.
As we approach this Thursday, April 9th, we must be prepared for the
procedural realities of the Supreme Court. Whether the matter reaches the board
for a full-day hearing or gets a short date depends on the Bench's load. But
let us be clear: An adjournment is not a defeat. The signals from the
Bench—specifically their interest in the "Charts"—remain consistently
encouraging.
Let us wait for the proceedings of the 9th with hope.
Regards,
JSOMA SHEKARA
--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAP9-UeKmkRhkh%3D16CqGac98sX2tDidX%2BTbbVMBLzJGsHqLKstg%40mail.gmail.com.
