If you encounter any job posts about converting pdf files to word or becoming their virtual assistant, IT IS A SCAM! I applied for the same post as a few others in the upwork community (pdf to word job) and had to share. The profile was verified so I thought it was all good. A guy named John emailed me from upwork to contact the manager. In that email, the link led me to telegram. I have never used telegram before. We messaged a little bit, he even sent me a sample. The guy's name was Jerome from **Edited for Community Guidelines** - I did google the company and all I found was a clothing company. It probably had nothing to do with it.
Jerome told me I had 7 days to complete the job. I did not even know the workload. He did not elaborate. He asked me for my name, number, address, email. I asked what do you need that for and he replied "identification." UGH! Then he emailed me an invoice. I said I did not get it. He was getting impatient and sent me a link leading to the invoice from igentahiring. Once he sent me an invoice of deposit due today for $100, I blocked him immediately. I do regret giving him/her my personal information. That we could never get back and who knows what they do with that...For example, creating accounts with our name and addresses, emails, phone numbers I contacted support and hopefully they track him/her/them down. Just know to never communicate outside of upwork again. It was my first time using as well. They emailed me from upwork so I thought it was legit at first.
There's no point in posting that information, which will be deleted by the modertor. When you see a job like this, just flag it and move on. And be aware that communication off of Upwork, through Telegram or whatever, is explicitly forbidden until/ unless a contract is in place. This type of situation is exactly why the Terms of Service are very specific about contact...
Well I needed exactly this service last night!! By a human not a machine...but it took me a long time to find one...wish there were agencies on here providing this service 24 hour and with a team ready...like the translation agencies I work for. Anyone who finds me a reputable one gets a small reward...go!!
some one call me and she said we are calling freelancer then later she gave some work like file conversion to pdf . she sent all the details like work submission mail and then i asked to her office address Freelancer
**Edited for Community Guidelines**this is the office address . can anyone help me is this real or fake but she is talking in telugu.
Someone called me to , but i have already do the task, i want to know if it fake? The offered translation task or convert pdf to word, and i told me to do an acc on glabal trust bank? I recived money? Is that true?
You should never accept payments outside of Upwork. This is considered Circumvention and is against the Terms of Service. In addition, communicating outside of Upwork before a contract is made is another serious violation of the TOS.
A real client will never ask you to give them money to start working, cash a check for them, work for free, or provide your personal information. Whenever you encounter these situations, please report them using the available flagging options so the team can investigate further. Please take some time to read through this article for more information on how you can stay safe on Upwork.
Enshittification is a pattern where online services and products experience a decline in quality over time. It is observed as platforms transition through several stages: initially offering high-quality services to attract users, then shifting to favor business customers to increase profitability, and finally focusing on maximizing profits for shareholders at the expense of both users and business customers. This process results in a significant deterioration of the user experience. A variety of platforms have been described as examples of this, including Airbnb, Amazon, Facebook, Google Search, Twitter, Netflix, Bandcamp, YouTube, Reddit, Quora, Uber, and Unity.
The neologism "enshittification" was coined by writer Cory Doctorow in November 2022 to describe this phenomenon. The American Dialect Society recognized the term's relevance and impact by selecting it as its 2023 Word of the Year. Doctorow has also referred to this concept as platform decay, emphasizing the inevitable decline in service quality due to these profit-driven changes.
To address and mitigate enshittification, Doctorow proposes two key solutions: respecting the end-to-end principle and ensuring the right of exit. The end-to-end principle means platforms should deliver data as requested by users, not based on algorithmic choices. Ensuring the right of exit involves making it easy for users to leave a platform without losing their data, requiring interoperability. These measures aim to maintain the quality and integrity of online platforms, prioritizing user experience and fostering competition.
"Enshittification" was first used by Cory Doctorow in a blog post in November 2022,[1] which was later republished in Locus in January 2023.[2] He expanded on the concept in another blog post,[3] that was republished in the January 2023 edition of Wired:[4]
Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. I call this enshittification, and it is a seemingly inevitable consequence arising from the combination of the ease of changing how a platform allocates value, combined with the nature of a "two sided market", where a platform sits between buyers and sellers, hold each hostage to the other, raking off an ever-larger share of the value that passes between them.
In a 2024 op-ed in the Financial Times, Doctorow extended the word with the term "enshittocene" to state that "'enshittification' is coming for absolutely everything". In the same article Doctorow also used an adjectival form, "enshittificatory".[5]
According to Doctorow, new platforms offer useful products and services at a loss, as a way to gain new users. Once users are locked in, the platform then offers access to the userbase to suppliers at a loss, and once suppliers are locked-in, the platform shifts surpluses to shareholders.[6] Once the platform is fundamentally focused on the shareholders, and the users and vendors are locked in, the platform no longer has any incentive to maintain quality. Enshittified platforms which act as intermediaries can functionally act as both a monopoly on services and a monopsony on customers, as high switching costs prevent either from leaving even when alternatives technically exist.[4] Doctorow has described the process of enshittification as happening through "twiddling"; the continual adjustment of the parameters of the system in search of marginal improvements of profits, without regard to any other goal.[7] Enshittification can be seen as a form of rent-seeking.[4]
The term "enshittification" has gained significant traction in both academic and public discussions since its introduction. Cory Doctorow's concept has been cited by various scholars and journalists as a framework for understanding the decline in quality of online platforms. Discussions about enshittification have appeared in numerous media outlets, including analyses of how tech giants like Facebook, Google, and Amazon have shifted their business models over time to prioritize profits at the expense of user experience. This phenomenon has sparked debates about the need for regulatory interventions and alternative models to ensure the integrity and quality of digital platforms [10].
The term gained traction in 2023, when it was widely adopted by journalists in reference to several major platforms discontinuing free features in order to further their monetization or taking other actions that were seen to degrade functionality in ways intended to thwart competition and increase profits.[11]
Once a disruptor competing with established hotel chains, Airbnb now charges nightly rates exceeding that of existing hotels.[12] This is a direct result of Airbnb now charging customers and hosts a mark-up of over 45% in service fees on transactions that use the online platform.[citation needed]
In Doctorow's original post, he discussed the practices of Amazon. First, Amazon started selling goods below cost to build up a user base. Amazon then introduced the Amazon Prime subscription which encouraged users to shop more exclusively at Amazon. The strong base of clients who had formed a habit of using Amazon exclusively incentivised more sellers to sell their products through Amazon, as Prime users were only searching Amazon for goods. Finally, Doctorow indicated that Amazon then began to focus on its shareholders by increasing profits and introducing fees. In 2023, 45%+ of the sale price of items went to Amazon in the form of various fees[citation needed]. He described advertisement within Amazon as a payola scheme, in which sellers are bidding against one another for search ranking preference, and identified that the first five pages of a search for "cat beds" were 50% advertisements.[4]
Doctorow has also criticised the near-monopoly of Amazon's Audible service, which controls over 90% of the audiobook market, and applies mandatory digital rights management (DRM) to all audio books. Doctorow pointed out that this meant that a user leaving the platform would lose access to their audio book library. Doctorow decided to independently distribute the audio version of his book The Internet Con: How to Seize the Means of Computation since Amazon's system would not distribute it without DRM.[13]
This term was used retroactively to describe the 2022 sale of Bandcamp to Epic Games, and later when Epic Games sold Bandcamp to music licensing firm Songtradr in September 2023.[14] In October 2023, it was revealed that almost half of Bandcamp's staff were laid off, including many key members of the executive team who apparently "vanished", according to former employees. Following this acquisition, there was a large outpouring of grief and rage on social media from many former employees, users and artists who viewed Bandcamp as an essential service for niche and independent artists to release music while retaining profits from the sale of their work.[15] Bandcamp had also unionized in March of 2023, and Songtradr laid off most of the staff involved in the union, as well as the people involved in negotiation with the union.[16] As of December 2023, Songtradr still has not formally recognized the union.[17] According to music journalist Philip Sherburne, writing for Pitchfork, by specifically targeting both the customer-support department and the editorial department for layoffs, Songtradr was signaling either ignorance or apathy for the reason Bandcamp had been successful.[14]
d3342ee215