martin
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:47 PM, C. K. Ponnappa <ckpon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/fail_duke_nukem/all/1
>
> Best,
> Sidu.
>
Reminds me a bit of Dreaming in Code, the book documenting the
failure-to-take-off of the Chandler project.[..]
>
> I did get me wondering how much of 'artistic integrity' you have to
> compromise to get a product out the door in time to keep your business
> running.
>
>
Remarkable article.
artistic integrity? I thought these guys lacked that. Borrowing ideas
left and right. The article gives me the impression that george
broussard was scared. and not in a good way.
--
Kumar Gaurav
Latest Post -- Gitting things right
http://wp.me/pbU2Q-2j
Remarkable article.
artistic integrity? I thought these guys lacked that. Borrowing ideas
left and right. The article gives me the impression that george
broussard was scared. and not in a good way.
>
> My point was that if you have to get something to ship, you *have* to cut
> out features that you want. Boussard seemed incapable of making those hard
> choices and the fact that it didn't hurt him didn't help either.
>
> If I had a successful pet project and I wanted to push out a sequel, I think
> I'd be hard pressed to just say 'that's enough, let's ship it'.
>
true
> P.S. Great artists steal - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW0DUg63lqU
>
I think great businessmen steal. great artists don't. regardless of
what steve jobs says . :)
Building obscure open source is easier - with no commercial angle, I can
putter away at my own pace, polishing this and buffing that. The fact
that there are no users besides myself removes the XP angle of gathering
feedback. Perhaps in this case the complete lack of success is a
blessing in disguise. :)
Best,
Sidu.