--
Biking conversations on the world famous "Bangalore Bikers Club" :)
bangalorebikersclub.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bangalore Bikers Club" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bangalore-bike...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
So, based on my personal experience / audio sensory levels, I would say if you are looking for special type to earphones, first check if the audio level that you are using, is "too loud". Much more so, is the (intermittent) audio cues from your navigation device, seem to be so loud as to drown out the traffic noise. (Ofcourse, admittedly, for listening to music while riding, I am_not really concerned about catching every word/note; as long as I get the basic song sense in my head, that is good enough. For audio navigation cues, however, one would want to hear each word clearly, so the audio level would need to be considerably higher, than what might be ok for listening to music.)
Also, note that various rides/races, mandate that the rider have an earphone/earpiece, only in one ear; that too, the ear that is on the "slower traffic" side (that would be left side, for India), so that the other ear is clear to hear traffic. Ideally, that is what you should consider, IMO.
Aside -- I don't know about other countries, but there really needs to be a (global) standard re: what type of horn should be installed for various kinds of vehicles. No matter how infrequently one might be expected to use the horn, the horn *must* indicate the basic size/category of vehicle. The horn on volvo buses are ridiculous; it sounds as if some 50cc moped is approaching!!
-{db}.
--
Biking conversations on the world famous "Bangalore Bikers Club" :)
bangalorebikersclub.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bangalore Bikers Club" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bangalore-bikers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
The horn is an audio cue, which does_not require any particular involvement from the "recepient"; and so, it is very important. IMO, thinking of it in terms of how frequently it is used, is wrong. A parachute in a passerger plane, is seldom used. But when it is time to use it, you would want it to be as easy to use as possible.
The horn does need to indicate the category of the vehicle, so that if you are in a tight spot on the road and have to take a split second decision, and you have someone sounding the horn, you can have a sense for what kind of vehicle is there in the direction of that sound (w/o having to look in that direction), and use that in your decision making. You might_not have the time / good fortune to have the luxury of that decision making; but if you do, it can make the difference between life-and-death.
Unfortunately, safety awareness / preparedness is a very ill-understood area, IMO even in the best of cases. As one indicator -- some of the "conclusions" that are drawn from air plane accidents, are very basic. But the reason why they are_not practicsed at the outset is that people are_not willing to acknowledge their importance. Only when an accident occurs that can be linked directly to some of the basic good / common-sense practices, do people accept those good practices. And then again, it's not because they really are imbibing the safety thought process; it's only because the new procedures require them to (which in-part is also to "cover their ass", incase a similar accident were to happen again.
Really... most folks (including supposed "experts") will not know safety measures, if they got hit on the head with them. Learning from accidents is good... but I don't think there ever has been a postmortem, which resulted in the subject coming back to life; so from the perspective of the subject, a postmortem is an academic exercise, IMO. The real experts are those who can see some of the accidents before they happen (or see things as they are going wrong, not after), and suggest what is needed to avoid them.
Earphones do cut out traffic noice to varying degrees; like i said, even if there is no music playing in the earphones. Question is what might be an acceptable trade off; that is something each one needs to decide for thmselves, while keeping the law in mind (which might simply say "no earphones", btw; in which case, this whole discussion is moot).
-{db}.
-{db}.
We needed a commercial plane to actually go missing, for such recommendations to be put into practice. Granted, there are various angles to such recommendations... but really, this did really take the ofcourse-we-care-about-safety cake, IMO.
-{db}.