oye.. u took a test ride on my bike near hebbal fly-over and u forgot the name?
Here you go.. : http://www.anyangmtb.co.kr/index.php?var=Good&Good_no=1008
- Murali
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Ravi Ranjan <raviranj...@gmail.com> wrote:
Murali,Please .. please .. please.... tell us the brabd name of the bike :-)We all are deparate to know the name of the bike you have!~Ravi
On 1/28/09, Murali Krishna <murali....@gmail.com> wrote:
I already have a high-end MTB (the California Apple I mentioned?). Forget the brand.. nobody will identify it here...Thats why I want to go for a road bike this time... btw, I used to use an MTB from 1994-1998 (Hercules), then a road bike (Hero-Hawk) from 1999 - 2006, then moved to a cool MTB in 2007.., now looking for another road-bike in 2009.. :)
- Murali
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Vishy <br.vis...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm... I can understand that. Even am waiting for my next upgrade (to
a roadbike, a Merida or a Trek), hopefully the global industry settles
soon and avid bikers like us have a ball to go.
And by the way, why dont check some MTB's out in the market. There
are plenty of them (local and imported).
Happy riding.
Cheers!!
Whether you want to shell out or not depends on you ! As you say - any
bike is good for riding.
The rims should be good - but I've seen that most people don't
willingly ride potholes with them - so we can't find how good they
are. The cycles are expensive because they are just imported, the USD
prices converted to INR (I'm simplifying here) and then sold. Let me
note that this applies to all things imported -e.g. Laptops, Digital
Cameras, ...
Note that cheap bicycles are available in the US as well (contrary to
popular local perception). I have personally ridden a 100 $ Mongoose
bike in New Hampshire (US) and it was very similar to a Hercules WoW.
> If you're into professional cycle racing, then it absolutely makes
> sense to go for the most cutting edge technology and splurge on these
> bikes; but where I'm coming from, I'm just an average city cyclist who
> just likes to tour around on the bicycle for hours together. I'm sure
> these kinda folks form majority of the population here unless I'm on
> the wrong community :-P So, hype, hysteria and irrational cult-
> mentality aside, and considering the *application* of these bikes, I
> don't see any difference in riding a hero hawk and any of the other
> exalted road bikes. :)
Sorry I need to disagree with you - first about the "professional"
part. We tend to equate "expensive" with professional, which is not
correct. Most bicycles sold locally are not, I repeat not,
professional bicycles. They are bikes for regular road/MTB riding. The
proof ? Look at their cost. E.g. a Trek 1.5 is 1099 $ compared to a
Top End Trek Madone which may cost all the way up from 4000 $ - 9000
$. So, most folks here aren't buying professional bicycles (owners :
sorry if I destroyed any illusions here!)
Now, given that these bicycles are not "professional" bicycles, it is
not necessary to be a professional to afford these - even in the
"developed" world. Ironically, software engineers here are in a much
better position to afford these rather than *professional* cyclists.
The problem(or opportunity depending on where you sit) is : more and
more people are willing to pay here !
If all one needs to do is ride, then the bicycle doesn't matter -
which is what you mean to say I think. Most imported bikes are better
quality for sure, but one doesn't need them just to ride. Sometimes, I
feel that people get an impression looking at the forums/mailing lists
"to ride you need a phoren bike". I know many will venture to tell me
that it's not true, and that's my personal opinion.
>
> Just wanted to explain my point; no intentions of trolling here.
> Please do not pounce :-P
Point taken - and differences explained I hope !
Regards
-- Shree
http://www.shreekumar.in/