Dunno... my impression was that EvoOnt BOM was gaining more interest
dans the proposal for baetle maybe ?
> Has anyone done RDFa + baetle, in say, trac? (since, well,
> google/yahoo/etc are starting to parse this stuff)
> Has anyone built any consumer tools for it?
>
We're interested in trying to do such things.
Some of our ideas are in the paper you'll find here :
http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/2009/06/06/presentation-at-wopdasd-2009-weaving-a-semantic-web-across-oss-repositories-a-spotlight-on-bts-link-udd-swim/
In any case, don't hesitate to share your progress here.
> 1)
> http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pearweb/public_html/bugs/rss/rdf.php?view=markup
> 2) http://code.google.com/p/baetle/wiki/Examples
>
My 2 cents,
Best regards,
--
Olivier BERGER <olivier...@it-sudparis.eu>
http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 1024D/6B829EEC
Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)
> It's also a bit unfortunate that http://xmlns.com/baetle/# isn'tDunno... my impression was that EvoOnt BOM was gaining more interest
> resolvable to any human readable docs.
>
> How many other implementations are out there?
dans the proposal for baetle maybe ?
I don't know myself what's best... and until enough people have
implemented either of the ontologies proposed around, I guess we're
cursed to remain in the current ambiguities. That's why your current
efforts on the PEAR bugtracker are very valuable.
In any case, a bit of OWL should help render them interoperable, I
suppose ;)
Any comments welcome.