1) Where on Eysenck's classification would this person fall?
George V would fall in the extraverted-neurotic classification. The relationships George has with his family can be described as tenuous and touchy; his mood depends on how well the sons adhere to his expectations and ideals. When discussing David’s marriage to Mrs. Simpson, he gets very irritable and easily aggressive, fitting the extraverted-neurotic category. Also, when Bertie fails at giving the Christmas speech, George constantly yells at him for his lack of ability to complete a sentence. His confidence and comfort when leading and giving orders suggests is evidence of his extraverted nature.
2) Does this character lend himself to one or more of Eysenck'straits, OR does he or she respond more toward situationalism?
George responds more toward situationalism; the disparity in his actions and thoughts suggests that he modifies his actions to give off a certain appearance. This is shown when on his death bed he commends Bertie for his bravery, but is so readily willing to invoke fear in him. He puts importance in the notion that sons must fear fathers, because he was raised that way, which might suggest normative conformity in the way he raises his sons.
3) How would you characterize this character's temperament? Is it innate, or do you think he or she builds this temperament from environmental factors?
George most likely has this temperament as a result from his thoughts on his expected personality. As king, he must appear strong, aggressive, confident and able to lead, all qualities that an extravert has. He expects he must act this way largely because of this actions of his father, rather than justifying it through more intrinsic ideas. He was not chosen for the throne for his innate qualities, but rather merely his birthplace; George had to modify his behavior to fit the needs of being king.
Lionel
1) Where on Eysenck's classification would this person fall?
Cite
three examples from the film that demonstrate this classification.
Lionel would most likely fall under extraverted-stable, with some introverted-stable characteristics as well. He is a very sociable and talkative person; in his line of work, which includes speaking with people and making them feel comfortable, this is vital. He demonstrates this when he convinces Bertie to talk to him about his deeper problems, rather than maintaining a purely professional relationship. He is also very easygoing and lively; he is able to make conversation with almost anyone, including rich and powerful people such as the king and queen, while many others would be excessively intimidated by them. He also demonstrates leadership by taking control of the situation surrounding Bertie, instructing him on how to improve and not letting him give up easily. He also displays some introverted-stable characteristics such as being a controlled, reliable, and thoughtful person.
2) Does this character lend himself to one or more of Eysenck's traits,
OR does he or she respond more toward situationalism? Provide at least 2
examples to support your analysis.
Lionel lends himself to several of Eysenck’s traits. He is shown to display extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness in multiple situations. He is displays these traits in both aspects of his life; his work and home situation. Towards his clients, he remains friendly, curious, tolerant, and responsible. He takes his cases seriously, and works hard to cure his patients, such as Bertie. On the other end, he also takes time with his family, trying to entertain and talk to them during dinner or by putting on little plays in the evening, while still remaining a responsible adult. These two parts of his life are very different, yet he maintains a similar attitude towards each, showing that he does not respond according to situationalism.
3) How would you characterize this character's temperament? Is it innate,
or do you think he or she builds this temperament from environmental factors?
I believe that Lionel’s temperament is largely innate, with a few environmental factors. He appears to have been extraverted for a long time, having dabbled in acting for much of his life. He seems to have the same positive, easygoing outlook towards most aspects of his life, and his job does not seem to have affected that in any way. Although he does have failures, they do not seem to significantly affect his levels of happiness and he appears to move on from them in a mature way. We do not learn much of his childhood or early life other than his role during the war, when he helped other soldiers with their speech difficulties.