Angela says she has no idea why this did not grt posted.
On 2/19/09, Guy Babineau <guy_ba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
I am sure that even if we were to discuss something offline that if I felt that there was something of importance that I thought needed to be posted on this forum she would give her her most sincere consideration.
|
You said "The reason why I think that this positing should be allowed is that if we are going to bring about changes including those needed with SBT we must first create awareness. This is why I think that this positing is important."
Angela said "Nevertheless, this is an interesting discussion"
I am having problems with, why are we not having these discussions above board so all members can judge for themselves.
|
Angela is dedicated to this forum and she would not let anything stand in the way of that dedication. |
Now that you have come back on this list with your perspective, perhaps we might ask Angela if she would be willing to reopen the discussions on representation at the Social Benefits Tribunal!
I wouldn't want to give the impression that Angela and I might cooperate under a veil of secrecy.
Then why are we not having an open discussion on these points!
The question still remains the same, are we going to have this discussion on this list or the other list, or as you say under a veil of secrecy!
Please don't get me wrong here, and this is with all due respect but it irks me to the 9th degree when people appear to suppress the facts/truth/evidence. Doesn't history tell us this is a very bad move?