[backlinq commit] r262 - trunk/test/BackLINQ.Tests

[codesite...@google.com]

Author: azizatif
Date: Sun Jan 25 04:11:13 2009
New Revision: 262

Modified:
trunk/test/BackLINQ.Tests/EnumerableFixture.cs

Log:
Reviewed tests for Contains operator and also bumped up the coverage of the
operator to 100% by addressing the optimization for collections.

Modified: trunk/test/BackLINQ.Tests/EnumerableFixture.cs
==============================================================================
--- trunk/test/BackLINQ.Tests/EnumerableFixture.cs (original)
+++ trunk/test/BackLINQ.Tests/EnumerableFixture.cs Sun Jan 25 04:11:13 2009
@@ -300,24 +300,29 @@
}

[Test]
- public void Contains_IntsContainingPassedValue_ReturnsTrue()
+ public void Contains_SequenceContainingSoughtValue_ReturnsTrue()
{
var source = Read(12, -15, 21);
Assert.That(source.Contains(21), Is.True);
}

[Test]
- public void Contains_IntsThatDoNotContainPassedValue_ReturnsFalse()
+ public void Contains_SequenceWithoutSoughtValue_ReturnsFalse()
{
var source = Read(-2, 4, 8);
Assert.That(source.Contains(9), Is.False);
}

[Test]
- public void Contains_ListOfIntsContainingPassedValue_ReturnsTrue()
+ public void
Contains_CollectionOptimization_ReturnsTrueWithoutEnumerating()
{
- var source = Read(1, 2, 3);
- Assert.That(source.Contains(3), Is.True);
+ var source = new NonEnumerableList<int>(new[] { 1, 2, 3 });
+
+ // IMPORTANT! Use the non-extension invocation style below
+ // to avoid calling List<T>.Contains instead of
+ // Enumerable.Contains.
+
+ Assert.That(Enumerable.Contains(source, 3), Is.True);
}

[Test]