On 01/06/2013 07:18 AM, Enraged Apostate, World Citizen wrote:
> =?UTF-8?B?RMOkbmsgNDLDmA==?= <
da...@nugget.com> wrote on Sun 06 Jan 2013
> 07:06:33a
>
>> On 01/05/2013 06:28 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:
>>>
>
>>> Could also be some government "agent provocateur"..
>>
>> I suspect there's lots of them on Usenet; "BroilJAB" in particular
>> appears to be one. And assuming the OP is sincere, he has hardly
>> advanced the gun rights cause with his death threat, which is why
>> he is most likely a government agent.
>
>
> I never accepted the statement that gun-loving, right-wing savage filth used
> their bang-bang toys in a perverse manner to play with their body orifices
> grotesquely in a sexual manner.
>
>
> But after reading this thread of you two certifiable freaks, how can anyone
> not be a believer in such weirdos?
This isn't MY thread, and what you just raved made no sense at all.
The funny thing about liberals is that back in the 1960s they were
so anti-establishment, and readily accepted paranoid conspiracy
theories about government agents infiltrating their ranks as they
demanded the overthrow of the U.S. government. Now that those same
hippie liberals have BECOME the establishment, they view non-liberals
who challenge it with suspicion, and infiltrate their ranks with
government agents.
A famous anarchist philosopher said it better than I could:
"When the Bolsheviks in Russia were outsiders, they vigorously opposed
censorship and the secret police, they advocated self-determination for
ethnic minorities, and so forth; but as soon as they came into power
themselves, they imposed a tighter censorship and created a more
ruthless secret police than any that had existed under the tsars, and
they oppressed ethnic minorities at least as much as the tsars had
done."
-- Industrial Society and Its Future