"Now I'm going to say something now and I won't say it ever again on
my program, perhaps. There are a group of people try to drive me out
of the radio business. They are working around the clock with lies and
hate. They are the true haters, they are the neo nazis of our time. I
doubt that they will succeed, they haven't damaged me at all. I
haven't lost one iota, not one station or one advertiser. But they're
slurring me."
"If they should succeed in damaging my career, if they should succeed
in driving me away from radio; I'm going to ask you to go on to
Michael Savage .com and have your name put on to a master directory
for me. I will release their names and addresses at that time. I will
release their names and addresses to you and I will disappear from
public life. But I can guarantee you that what goes around comes
around and that's all I'm going to say right now. If you haven't
gotten it yet, get it"
"I'm more powerful than you are you little hateful nothings. You call
yourself this for that and that for this. You say you represent
groups, you represent nobody but the perverts that you hang around
with and I'm warning you if you try to damage me any further with
lies, be aware of something: that which you stoke shall come to burn
you, the ashes of the fireplace will come and burn your own house
down. Be very careful, you are living in incendiary times. You can't
just throw things at people and walk away thinking that you had a
little fun. I warn you; I'm gonna warn you again, if you harm me and I
pray that no harm comes to you, but I can't guarantee that it won't. "
These statements were transcibed directly from a digital audio file of
the show. I have that digital audio file.
The Coalition for Human Decency
ad...@michaelsavagesucks.com
http://www.michaelsavagesucks.com
Communist pinko, these are the same yardbirds who yell over anyone they
don't want to hear. You should also post on alt.commie.nofreespeech
> These statements were transcibed directly from a digital audio file of
> the show. I have that digital audio file.
That is really powerful stuff. Take it to the World Court.
Zzzzz.....
--
John Higdon | Email Address Valid | SF: +1 415 428-COWS
+1 408 264 4115 | AIM: plodder5 | FAX: +1 408 264 4407
Ever heard of freedom of speech? The name of the web site itself,
michaelsavagesucks.com implies it is as bias Michael Savage. Coalition
for Human Decency and michaelsavagesucks.com is an oxymoron. Pissed
off that Michael Savage has a syndicated show? You probably couldn't
get air time on a pirate radio station in Berkeley. Watch out, your
web site might get hacked.
-
"Justice will be served, and the battle will rage.
This big dog will fight when you rattle his cage.
And you'll be sorry that you messed with the U.S. of A.
'Cause we'll put a boot in you're ass.
It's the American way."
---Toby Keith
>in article e095ca4f.02062...@posting.google.com, Todd Fotuar
>wrote:
>
>> These statements were transcibed directly from a digital audio file of
>> the show. I have that digital audio file.
>
>That is really powerful stuff. Take it to the World Court.
>
>Zzzzz.....
He should take it to the People's Court. He get more coverage.
You obviously haven't heard Michael Wein--, umm, sorry, "Savage"
with any listener that dares to disagree with him and that
actually manages to get in a telling point before he stomps
on them. If you want to know what "yelling" is, give it
a shot. . . .
Cheers,
-- Arne Langsetmo
> . . . You should also post on alt.commie.nofreespeech
Kind of reminds me of another RW talk show foamer, Micheal Gallagher.
One day, while talking about the latest travails of the "finest" in
the NYC area, one caller went and called the police "pigs". Both
Gallagher and one other caller, later after the caller was gone,
expressed the sentiment that they hoped this caller would find
himself alone in an alley with three or more of them, or something
along those lines. ;-)
Cheers,
-- Arne Langsetmo
The assholes that rail against a radio talk show host, be it Michael
Savage, Mike Gallagher, Rush Limbaugh or Dr. Laura. just need to be
spanked or have a diaper change. They are too scared to compete in the
radio world so they try to get that host off the air. Competition
frightens Socialists.
Savage has invited his naysayers to debate him on the air, but the
prefer to launch a "get him off the air campaign". A grassroots
campaigns that has a lot of weeds or smokes too much weed.
The moron that started this thread just wants to promote his losing
web site. Successful web sites get a lot of hits because of its
contents. If a user wants whine, he'll go to a Napa Valley web site,
Whine doesn't sell.
Back up the truck, fella
Are you saying that Savage's show is a proper forum for debate???
Put down that crack pipe!
I'd love to see your hero in a REAL debate that he cannot micromanage
against someone intelligent. I bet he couldn't even stomp through
Jello Biafra to get to the heavyweights. Savage WOULD NEVER debate
in a proper forum.
>
>>Savage has invited his naysayers to debate him on the air, but the
>>prefer to launch a "get him off the air campaign".
>
> Back up the truck, fella
>
> Are you saying that Savage's show is a proper forum for debate???
Appareently they are to shallow and cowardly to do so.
> Put down that crack pipe!
> I'd love to see your hero in a REAL debate that he cannot micromanage
> against someone intelligent. I bet he couldn't even stomp through
> Jello Biafra to get to the heavyweights. Savage WOULD NEVER debate
> in a proper forum.
Scary, isn't it?
Then what's the beef? Oh, I'm sure a web site by some whiner
(michelsavagesucks.com) is the proper place. Again, he has invited
oraganizers of the hate Savage movement, the whiners from Portland, to
appear on his show.
Another bogus posting in Ras Mikael Enoch's name [below],
more identity theft, spic and spam from me Jose' Scott.
In article <afdi8...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ras says...
>
>In article <1skjhu8fe2spu0jfm...@4ax.com>, Ich says...
>>
>>On 26 Jun 2002 06:01:35 -0700, Ras Mikael Enoch
>><Ras_m...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>Savage has invited his naysayers to debate him on the air, but the
>>>>prefer to launch a "get him off the air campaign".
>>>
>>> Back up the truck, fella
>>>
>>> Are you saying that Savage's show is a proper forum for debate???
>>
>>Appareently they are to shallow and cowardly to do so.
>
> The point is simple, not calling up a micromanaged
> kangaroo court to be shouted down and interupted is
> not an act of cowardice, merely good sense.
>
> As for people who disagree with him and listen for
> the sake of being appaled, they get what they deserve.
>
The point is simple, not calling up a micromanaged
Hey Ra$, Spliff Skankin' takes it up the ass better than you'll
ever know.
In article <afdi8...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ras says...
>
>In article <1skjhu8fe2spu0jfm...@4ax.com>, Ich says...
>>
>>On 26 Jun 2002 06:01:35 -0700, Ras Mikael Enoch
>><Ras_m...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>Savage has invited his naysayers to debate him on the air, but the
>>>>prefer to launch a "get him off the air campaign".
>>>
>>> Back up the truck, fella
>>>
>>> Are you saying that Savage's show is a proper forum for debate???
>>
>>Appareently they are to shallow and cowardly to do so.
>
> The point is simple, not calling up a micromanaged
> kangaroo court to be shouted down and interupted is
> not an act of cowardice, merely good sense.
>
> As for people who disagree with him and listen for
> the sake of being appaled, they get what they deserve.
Apparently you cannot address any of my points. Having fun with your
bogus whining?
John, John, John.
If I posted with live battery leads clipped to my earlobes, the
rest of the world would seem irrelevant to me, too.
klystron
Lying Socialist Weasel
PS: Why isn't this posted to alt.radio.talk?
[snip]
> >
> The assholes that rail against a radio talk show host, be it Michael
> Savage, Mike Gallagher, Rush Limbaugh or Dr. Laura. just need to be
> spanked or have a diaper change. They are too scared to compete in the
> radio world so they try to get that host off the air. Competition
> frightens Socialists.
?
Bernie Ward has offered to debate Savage on his own show, on
Savage's show, or on neutral ground, too many times to count.
Savage just runs. He's a WorldCom Conservative.
klystron
Lying Socialist Weasel
Can't you take a joke?
Imposter postings, identity theft is something that I enjoy.
I suggest that you get with the program loser. I can steal
Ras Mikael Enoch's name and post under his name all I want.
I am Jose' Scott the satanist at KFJC 89.7 FM.
Try and stop me!
Ra$ can't stop me and neither can you!
> In article <B93DE8E3.6516B%no-
> sp...@ClearChannel.RadioMonopoly.com>, no-
> sp...@ClearChannel.RadioMonopoly.com says...
>> in article e095ca4f.02062...@posting.google.com, Todd Fotuar
>> wrote:
>>
>>> These statements were transcibed directly from a digital audio file of
>>> the show. I have that digital audio file.
>>
>> That is really powerful stuff. Take it to the World Court.
>>
>> Zzzzz.....
>>
>
> John, John, John.
>
> If I posted with live battery leads clipped to my earlobes, the
> rest of the world would seem irrelevant to me, too.
Savage is hardly "the world".
> PS: Why isn't this posted to alt.radio.talk?
More importantly, why is it posted in ba.broadcast? Like we need a blow by
blow all the time of what some second-rate KSFO talkshow host says.
You mistake me for someone else. As near as I can tell, you mistake
me for some figment of your imagination.
> . . . Competition
> frightens Socialists.
Apparently you see some "competition" in all the RW foamer
talk radio shows. I don't.
> Savage has invited his naysayers to debate him on the air, . . .
But then again, actions speak louder than words. Mike "Savage"
has his thumb poised on the kill button at all times, and
has cut me off _each time_ I have called his show. His Emanence
Rush doesn't even bother with such a false facade; he simply
refuses to enter into any arena where he can't stomp on the
"kill" button, and cut off anyone who's starting to point out
what a moron he is.
> . . . but the
> prefer to launch a "get him off the air campaign". A grassroots
> campaigns that has a lot of weeds or smokes too much weed.
My, but the argumentum ad hominem really suits you. Such is
one of "Savage"'s favourite tacktics.
> The moron that started this thread just wants to promote his losing
> web site. Successful web sites get a lot of hits because of its
> contents. If a user wants whine, he'll go to a Napa Valley web site,
> Whine doesn't sell.
I don't think that anyone on the right can complain about
letter writing campaigns and boycotts after they wrote the
_book_ on trying to stifle the voices of those that they don't
want to hear through such tactics.
I'm in favour of freedom of speech. I don't want to shut
Mike "Savage" up. I think he'd look fine on a soapbox on
Market Street or on the Berkeley Campanilla. But I think
it is _my_ right to express _my_ displeasure with the doyens
of DTW for hosting such a loathsome display of viciousness
and hatred.
If I can talk people of good conscience into deciding that
such a slimy vermin doesn't deserve thousands of kilowatts
of broadcast power to spead his vitriol, that is as it
should be.
Cheers,
-- Arne Langsetmo
>in article MPG.1783ee8f8...@news.sonic.net, klystron wrote:
>
>> In article <B93DE8E3.6516B%no-
>> sp...@ClearChannel.RadioMonopoly.com>, no-
>> sp...@ClearChannel.RadioMonopoly.com says...
>>> in article e095ca4f.02062...@posting.google.com, Todd Fotuar
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> These statements were transcibed directly from a digital audio file of
>>>> the show. I have that digital audio file.
>>>
>>> That is really powerful stuff. Take it to the World Court.
>>>
>>> Zzzzz.....
>>>
>>
>> John, John, John.
>>
>> If I posted with live battery leads clipped to my earlobes, the
>> rest of the world would seem irrelevant to me, too.
>
>Savage is hardly "the world".
>
>> PS: Why isn't this posted to alt.radio.talk?
>
>More importantly, why is it posted in ba.broadcast? Like we need a blow by
>blow all the time of what some second-rate KSFO talkshow host says.
Yeah. Pretty cool of Todd and friends to let us know what Weiner said every
other day since most of us DON'T LISTEN TO HIM. </irony>
>Apparently you cannot address any of my points. Having fun with your
>bogus whining?
The "point" I addressed earlier was this:
>> Are you saying that Savage's show is a proper forum for debate???
>Appareently they are to shallow and cowardly to do so.
Savage inviting "liberals" to debate him on the air
does not make a fair forum for debate.
Speaking of cowards, your last statement makes you
a coward for dodging my point.
Savage routinely "pots down" the voices of callers and
interupts them in mid sentence. This is not a fair debate.
Explain how someone is "shallow" or a "coward" for not
calling up for free abuse???
Consider reading some books, otherwise Savage will retard
you to the Mc Carty level.
>I suggest that you get with the program loser. I can steal
>Ras Mikael Enoch's name and post under his name all I want.
>I am Jose' Scott the satanist at KFJC 89.7 FM.
>Try and stop me!
>Ra$ can't stop me and neither can you!
Take out the "steal" and "Jose Scott the satanist at KFJC"
and we're on to a winner here, Michael!
He's syndicated. He's apparently pissed off some of that 'world.'
It's reasonable grist for the Usenet mill, I think.
>
> > PS: Why isn't this posted to alt.radio.talk?
>
> More importantly, why is it posted in ba.broadcast? Like we need a blow by
> blow all the time of what some second-rate KSFO talkshow host says.
John, John, John.
1) ba.broadcast is chock FULL of KSFO loonies. Has been
since before Shann Nixx did her "Naked Lunch" broadcasts
over there.
2) The Bay Area is also where all the 'Savage' nonsense
eminates from.
3) In fact, all I did, was to follow up YOUR post, which
came from ba.broadcast.
Three strikes. Why the fuck blame me for something YOU did? ....
just because you can?
Oh. I forgot the spinster hypocracy factor, where you get to
archly ignore any dried pea that makes your royal maidenly tush
smart even the least little bit.
kly
"Todd Fotuar" <ad...@michaelsavagesucks.com> wrote in message
news:e095ca4f.02062...@posting.google.com...
Jello a serious debater? He's got a bigger ego than Savage, who is at least
entertaining...
> If he's so terrible, why are you listening? Turn him off if you don't like
> him.
If enough people don't bother listening to his program, don't
be surprised if his program goes away. The people who pay for the
transmitter get their income from advertising and you don't get any
advertisers if the advertisers know that no one is listening.
BTW, I don't listen to him (actually, I've given up on radio in
general due to the obnoxious nature of advertising on most if not
all stations---not only is there too much advertising, but too much
of the ads seem to consist of fast talking, screaming idiots).
Bill
--
As an anti-spam measure, my email address is only provided in a GIF
file. Please see <http://home.pacbell.net/zaumen/email.gif>.
Spammers can try mailto:s34...@aol.com mailto:sdkj34...@aol.com
> Entertaining to a Proto-Nazi like you, a follower of Savage, perhaps !
It does you much discredit to resort to name-calling of people who simply
disagree with your point of view.
> Not to most decent, non-hate filled people, to be sure.
Why would "decent, non-hate filled people" be listening to Savage? Do they
not have tunable or switchable radios?
> in article 3d2cf6d5...@news.alt.net, Tom Teller wrote:
> > Not to most decent, non-hate filled people, to be sure.
>
> Why would "decent, non-hate filled people" be listening to Savage? Do they
> not have tunable or switchable radios?
Regardless of whether the radios are tunable or switchable, all need a
power source. At worst (if you can't find the on/off switch), you can
unplug the unit or take out the batteries.
The above comment is independent of the content of Savage's program,
which I've never bothered listening to (nor have I heard Dr. Laura,
referred to as "that woman doctor on the radio" in the Lamplighter's
production of The Mikado last summer. They updated Koko's list
of pending victims who "would surely not be missed" in case they
had to execute someone, and also included "democrats and republicans
who left us in the dark" which left the audience rolling on the floor
laughing, particularly as they dimmed the lights for dramatic
effect.)
No one is forcing people to listen to Savage's show. Don't like him? Why
listen?
Yes - precisely. I for one - can't get too worked up about anything Mr.
Savage might say, since I quit listening to him years ago. I greatly enjoy
listening to talk show hosts with views different from my own - but he
committed the unpardonable sin of being boring. I checked in on his show
about a year ago and had to turn him off after about half an hour. Savage
just has his schtick, and once you've heard it - you've heard it. Yawn.....
Guido
> In article <B94E6EA0.66548%no-...@ClearChannel.RadioMonopoly.com>, John
> Higdon <no-...@ClearChannel.RadioMonopoly.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Why would "decent, non-hate filled people" be listening to Savage? Do they
> > not have tunable or switchable radios?
>
> Regardless of whether the radios are tunable or switchable, all need a
> power source. At worst (if you can't find the on/off switch), you can
> unplug the unit or take out the batteries.
Maybe they are listening from someplace like North Korea. Off-buttons are
illegal over there
(or so I've heard...)
I agreee Guido...he is like the Eminen of Talk Radio...being
confrontational to sell ad space...
--
I guess making ignorant remarks like that is a heck of a lot easier than
coming up with an intelligent argument to support your position, especially
when one has a shortage of brain cells.
> Not to most decent, non-hate filled people, to be sure.
Funny how people who make such ridiculous, inflammatory, and stupid
statements, lecture OTHERS about being "hate-filled". Grow up, Little Boy.