Hi Hemanth,
I have made several telescopes, including a Newton, a Stevic-Paul, and an enhanced achromat.
My strong suggestion is that you go for a Newton, e.g. a mirror telescope, unless you make the telescope for the sake of making a telescope, like I did. It gives you a deep insight of issues you can come across making more complex instruments. I am currently working on a 3,5" calcium fluorite 3-lens oiled apochromatic Binocular for example, together with a guy from Zeiss... and I am just scratching at the surface of the issues, in the best meaning of the word...
Nevertheless even if you like to make one of the more complex (and not even better for observation) telescopes, it would still be best to start with a Newton, simply, because it is the most efficient way.
I have a number of blanks at home. If anyone visits Frankfurt some time, I am happy to share some 6-10".
If you like to build your own scope for cost reasons over a built one, I need discourage you, that would be the really hard way. It is possible to build a telescope almost from nothing, but that requires a lot of luck, effort and time. ( I have slivered the mirrors of my Stevic-Paul with self made silver nitrate..., so I know what hand-made is,...)
A Newton telescope, 6 or 8" is what you want to have, with a focal ration of about 8 for observing. A good compromise between effort, investment and outcome.
I wish you all the best,
Greetings from Frankfurt,
Nikolas Hericks