Agenda Points SGBM
Sanjeev Chhikara
Dear Members,
Agenda Points for SGBM scheduled on 09 Sep 2018:
1. Transfer/Disposal of Apartment. The following points must be considered in the SGBM scheduled on 03 Jun 2016:
a) After possession - sale of the apartment/DU will be as per terms and conditions of eligibility and applicability as announced during the launch of the project, as per the AWHO rules.
b) As per AWHO sale to only Army personnel is applicable in respect of DUs/projects planned after 01 Jan 2014.
c) In case of AWHO-Greater Noida Project, the disposal of apartments/DUs will be as per Para 80 to 82 of the Master Brochure Jul 87 (as amended upto 29 Feb 2004). Para 80 (b) of the Master Brochure quote "the allottee may be permitted to sell his DU to any one (civilians) after three years from the date of possession or one year from the date of retirement, which is earlier. No other restriction will apply".
d) To amend the bye-laws, Prior Approval of AWHO is must.
(E) In view of above, the bye- laws can not amend the above terms and conditions for Disposal of Apartment/DUs.
(f) directions of the Registrar must be implemented by the RWA in this matter which clearly and unambiguously states that the DU owners have absolute right to sell/purchase/renting...they can sell/rent their property to any Indian citizen.....RWA’s role is restricted to common area maintenance and management....RWA has no role whatsoever in managing the individual DUs and why should RWA act like property brokers? RWA must not further the interest of select few.....one thing must be very clear that the defence related facilities (csd, ECHS etc) can only be utilised by people entitled for the same......not by civilian residents or tenants.
2. Payment of amount equal to 2% of transfer/sale value to the RWA for obtaining "No Dues Certificate" is illegal and unjustified and amounts almost blackmailing the non resident owners. Should be objected.......directions of the Registrar must be implemented by the RWA and not more than 0.5% be charged by either AWHO or RWA.......both agencies must not act like brokers.
3. Certain clauses are framed just to favour only resident members and grossly against the non resident members. Non resident members must object all such clauses with all force.
4. Quorum. It can not be restricted to presence of one third of the living members only. This is the major reason that views of non resident are ignored and they are put in total disadvantage.. An owner is legal member and his vote has equal weightage whether he resident or non resident member. Even a non resident member enjoys each and equal right in the society at par with the resident members, no one should have any doubts in it.And lastly, every allotted of the society is equal member irrespective of rank structure of the armed forces (be he a sepoy or a General), we all must understand this fact for better community living.
- Construction of School.....let the AWHO handle it.
Pardon me if I have harsh in use of language.
Regards to all Members
Sanjeev