--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AVA Dataset Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ava-dataset-us...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ava-data...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ava-dataset-users/8eec3ac6-bd44-4be9-8833-8731c894aeba%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi Jiagang Zhu,Thanks for your interest in AVA. The method for annotating person ids is described in section 3.4 of the paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.08421.pdf.Are the problems that you're seeing false positives (two different people get the same id) or false negatives (the same person gets two different ids and is not linked)?Regards,David
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 3:02 AM jiagang zhu <zhujia...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing this dataset.--I tried to visualize the person id of each person roi and I found many mismatching cases of the same person between different frames.I am wondering how the person ids of AVA were annotated. Thank you.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AVA Dataset Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ava-data...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ava-dataset-us...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ava-data...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ava-dataset-users/e2c1fbe5-d452-487b-85d5-06073b024629%40googlegroups.com.