Re: Dirty Politics: Republican Congressman from Florida Caught in Corruption Scandal
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---
> See Video: http://www.alternet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlterNet
AlterNet, a project of the non-profit Independent Media Institute, is a
progressive/liberal news and opinion website that was launched in 1998
and claims a readership of over 1.7 million visitors per month.[1]. It
has been described by NPR as a "left-liberal news and opinion site".[2]
It publishes original content as well as journalism from a wide variety
of other sources. AlterNet states that its mission is to "inspire
citizen action and advocacy on the environment, human rights and civil
liberties, social justice, media, and health care issues."[1]
http://www.newstrust.net/sources/files/alternet/
AlterNet is a left-wing news website that was created in 1998. It
publishes original editorial commentary as well as commentary from other
sources. It is a project of the Independent Media Institute, and
politically left-of-center.
\===77===//
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:48:39 GMT, "Sam the flamer "---ooO-(_)-Ooo---"
> <k...@roy.here> wrote:
>
>> Lyle Andrew wrote:
>>
>>> See Video: http://www.alternet.
>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlterNet
>>
>> AlterNet, a project of the non-profit Independent Media Institute, is a
>> progressive/liberal news and opinion website that was launched in 1998
>> and claims a readership of over 1.7 million visitors per month.[1]. It
>> has been described by NPR as a "left-liberal news and opinion site".[2]
>> It publishes original content as well as journalism from a wide variety
>> of other sources. AlterNet states that its mission is to "inspire
>> citizen action and advocacy on the environment, human rights and civil
>> liberties, social justice, media, and health care issues."[1]
>>
No they don't, stop being a public fool.
\===77===//
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:44:11 GMT, \\===77===// <s...@set.strip> wrote:
>
>> Lyle Andrew wrote:
>>> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:48:39 GMT, "Sam the flamer "---ooO-(_)-Ooo---"
>>> <k...@roy.here> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lyle Andrew wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> See Video: http://www.alternet.
>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlterNet
>>>>
>>>> AlterNet, a project of the non-profit Independent Media Institute, is a
>>>> progressive/liberal news and opinion website that was launched in 1998
>>>> and claims a readership of over 1.7 million visitors per month.[1]. It
>>>> has been described by NPR as a "left-liberal news and opinion site".[2]
>>>> It publishes original content as well as journalism from a wide variety
>>>> of other sources. AlterNet states that its mission is to "inspire
>>>> citizen action and advocacy on the environment, human rights and civil
>>>> liberties, social justice, media, and health care issues."[1]
>>>>
>>> Classic. Wikipedia controls Google
>> No they don't, stop being a public fool.
>>
> There's only one public fool here Stalinst Sam.
> Classic. Wikipedia controls GoogleThe People's Communist Republic of
> Wikipedia?, aka WikEYEpedeuh, is a massively multiplayer online
> role-playing game (MMORPG) in which participants play editors of a
> hypothetical online encyclopedia. The goal is to try to insert
> misinformation that is randomly assigned at signup, while preventing
> any contrary information from being entered by others. Players with
> similar misinformation will generally form "guilds" in order to aid
> one another.
You LOST the game fool, read the footnotes in the wiki article on alternet:
References
^ a b c The Case for AlterNet
That is alternet itself they cited, and...
^ a b Media Online: A Few Firms Thrive While Many Fail
http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/features/2001/jul/010702.karr.html
4) Alternet -- This independent, left-liberal news and opinion site has
seen a six-fold increase in traffic since the end of 2000. Executive
Editor Don Hazen says that's in part because the Bush administration has
prompted readers to look for liberal news sources, in much the same way
that conservative media blossomed after the election of Bill Clinton.
The site is funded by a combination of individual support and foundation
grants.
I know, I know...NPR's gaming wiki now too, right?
You ignorant fucknozzle.
http://www.newstrust.net/sources/files/alternet/
AlterNet is a left-wing news website that was created in 1998. It
publishes original editorial commentary as well as commentary from other
sources. It is a project of the Independent Media Institute, and
politically left-of-center.
> http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Neocon
_
>Lyle Andrew wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:48:39 GMT, "Sam the flamer "---ooO-(_)-Ooo---"
>> <k...@roy.here> wrote:
>>
Nothing of any importance, just the usual Wikipedia bullshit. Here is the
actual link to Wikipedia's bullshit existance on it's parent site: As with
most Stalinists, Sam can only deny the truth which is:
Welcome to the People's Republic of Wikipedia, where power-hungry admins
watch everything you do.
You are really asking for trouble making comments like that. See WP:RIGHTS
about your pathetic "Constitution" argument. Britannica on the bathroom
wall.
The People's Communist Republic of Wikipedia?, aka WikEYEpedeuh, is a
massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG) in which
participants play editors of a hypothetical online encyclopedia. The goal is
to try to insert misinformation that is randomly assigned at signup, while
preventing any contrary information from being entered by others. Players
with similar misinformation will generally form "guilds" in order to aid one
another.
Wikipedia players gain more authority as they progress, with "Administrator"
and "Double-O Licensed" rankings granting them access to game processes not
available to others. While the rules for winning the game are a tightly-kept
secret, it is believed that the winner is treated to a night of ass sex with
Wikipedia creator/overlord, the wikipedo Jimbo Wales (lube not included).
The encyclopedia aspect of the Wikipedia game is a fairly obvious rip-off of
Encyclopedia Dramatica, except that the Wikipedia version tends to have
terminally boring entries on useless topics like the lives of 17th century
rabbis, characteristics of the 57th termite chromosome, and Hollywood films
including one or more of the Sesame Street Muppets -- in other words,
content with no real relevance to the internets or internet culture, and
thus is shit. Wikipedia is the worst example of an open-source project in
the world.
In addition to being shit, Wikipedia tends to be characterized by instances
of A+ Lame Edit Wars, which contain a level of pathetic dedication only
possible on the internets. It is well known for its repository of tl;dr
articles portraying a skewed perception of reality. The only reason anyone
ever visits the site is because its free. Information on Wikipedia topics
can generally be found through Google and other forms of reference material,
like books. Actually, screw it: if it's not on ED, it's not worth knowing
about.
TOW (that other wiki) likes to think of themselves as the 21st century's
answer to the Library of Alexandria, but, in reality, they fall somewhere
closer to the collective scribblings on a truck stop bathroom wall.
_
>
>You LOST the game fool, read the footnotes in the wiki article on alternet:
>
You can't tell the difference between a post, a repost and who authored
what. You're mixed up and for a stupid man that's a poor recipe. The only
game you play is called "Lie, Cheat & Steal" Spammy. Nobody wins
that game.
\===77===//
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Lyle Andrew (the latest al Qaeda in Iraq PR flak) wrote:
Most of the people you call "Terrorists" are those defending their
country from invaders
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX