Yardhelp:
Tracey
If your yard help just mows and edges the lawn,
are you paying about $20.00?
Bonny Jock
time for anything (but getting old). (:
---spic and span.
"Anonymous" <cri...@ecn.org> wrote in message
news:6eeadb062f230f38...@ecn.org...
>
> "Tracey" <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote in message
news:3CD42B0A...@hotbot.com...
> > How much do you pay your yardhelp?
> >
> > If your yard help just mows and edges the lawn,
> > are you paying about $20.00?
> >
> >
> >
> Depends how big your yard is.
> I always hire wetbacks for the job, They do work, unlike the Negro.
> If any of you have ever hired a Negro to do yard work, you know what I
mean.
>
>
Tracey
wetback criminals.
But, it would be interesting to know what others are paying their yardhelp for
an average yard.
Amy
>
> If your yard help just mows and edges the lawn,
> are you paying about $20.00?
My kid only gets $10 and he still has to clean his room to get it.
Amy
Karen Kay
news:8af53531.02050...@posting.google.com:
Do you rent him out?
--
Karen
Not Me
>Actually, I hire US born High School students who need the money, and are not
>wetback criminals.
I would hire an illegal before I hired you, Tracey.
Tracey
Frog3 wrote:
> "Amy" <ato...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:8af53531.02050...@posting.google.com...
> > Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote in message news:<3CD42B0A...@hotbot.com>...
> > > How much do you pay your yardhelp?
> > >
> > > If your yard help just mows and edges the lawn,
> > > are you paying about $20.00?
> >
> > My kid only gets $10 and he still has to clean his room to get it.
> >
> > Amy
>
> Only $10? You're cheap, you must be Jewish. A kid can't even go to the movies on $10. You as a
> mother should clean your Childs room. House cleaning is a woman's job, by having him clean his
> own room, will teach him that guys should clean house.
Tracey
love our country.
Clay Colwell
>> On Mon, 06 May 2002 14:59:02 GMT, Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Actually, I hire US born High School students who need the money, and are not
>> >wetback criminals.
>>
>> I would hire an illegal before I hired you, Tracey.
> Im sure you would. You show no signs of being an American, nor do you seem to
> love our country.
Er, no. Given your trollish ways, Not Me recognizes that you'd do
a lousy job and would spend more time trying to get the neighborhood
children to pick fights with each other. That or try to hit on all
the hairy big-breasted Jewish women in the area.
Tracey
Tracey
certainly not all Jews are tight as a tick.
So are my German friends, and most continental eurotrash types. There is a reason for
their selfishness, however! It is a lack of biblical understanding. God says if a man
asks you for your shirt, give him your shoes, too. In other words, don't be greedy.
Its natural to be very selfish. A lot of cultures just don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:
> "Tracey" <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote in message news:3CD6F855...@hotbot.com...
> > As a matter of fact, She Is Jewish! How did you know!
> >
> Because she's cheap!!
JETman
Yeah, I have some grass for him to mow too...
$10 is a bargain!!!
--
Regards,
JT (Residing in Austin, Texas)
Just Tooling Down The Internet Superhighway With my G4.......
Steve Wertz
>
> Karen Kay wrote:
> >
> > ato...@yahoo.com (Amy) wrote in
> > news:8af53531.02050...@posting.google.com:
> >
> > > Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote in message
> > > news:<3CD42B0A...@hotbot.com>...
> > >> How much do you pay your yardhelp?
> > >>
> > >> If your yard help just mows and edges the lawn,
> > >> are you paying about $20.00?
> > >
> > > My kid only gets $10 and he still has to clean his room to get
> > > it.
> >
> > Do you rent him out?
> > --
> > Karen
>
> Yeah, I have some grass for him to mow too...
>
> $10 is a bargain!!!
They're called 'chores' and I didn't get paid jack shit, except for
food, shelter, clothing.
-sw
Clay Colwell
>> Er, no. Given your trollish ways, Not Me recognizes that you'd do
>> a lousy job and would spend more time trying to get the neighborhood
>> children to pick fights with each other. That or try to hit on all
>> the hairy big-breasted Jewish women in the area.
> Okay, sweetie.
No, I am not a hairy big-breasted Jewish woman, and no, I will
never sleep with you, no matter how much you plead, so don't
bother to waste pillow talk on me.
Clay Colwell
> certainly not all Jews are tight as a tick.
s/Jews/people in general/
That'll be $120 for the proofreading, Travid.
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
You misunderstood me. I thought you were a girl, too.
Ladies call each other similar names all the time.
I apologize. I was just practicing "gay sensitivity".
Jeffrey E. Salzberg
> You misunderstood me. I thought you were a girl, too.
> Ladies call each other similar names all the time.
> I apologize. I was just practicing "gay sensitivity".
>
No, David, you were just being, as usual, an idiot.
Clay Colwell
> Clay Colwell wrote:
>> In austin.general Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
>> > Clay Colwell wrote:
>>
>> >> Er, no. Given your trollish ways, Not Me recognizes that you'd do
>> >> a lousy job and would spend more time trying to get the neighborhood
>> >> children to pick fights with each other. That or try to hit on all
>> >> the hairy big-breasted Jewish women in the area.
>>
>> > Okay, sweetie.
>>
>> No, I am not a hairy big-breasted Jewish woman, and no, I will
>> never sleep with you, no matter how much you plead, so don't
>> bother to waste pillow talk on me.
> You misunderstood me. I thought you were a girl, too.
Liar. Bearer of false witness.
> Ladies call each other similar names all the time.
Given that you're no lady, I fail to see the point.
> I apologize. I was just practicing "gay sensitivity".
Liar. Bearer of false witness.
How does it feel to make the Baby Jesus cry so consistently,
oh-self-professed-Christian?
Tracey
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
Queen, Im more of a woman than you. I was born this way. Im not putting on a
low grade, homosexual attempt at being female.
So, are you , or are you not the feminine half of a homosexual relationship?
Clay Colwell
> Clay Colwell wrote:
>> In austin.general Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Clay Colwell wrote:
>>
>> >> In austin.general Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
>> >> > Clay Colwell wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> Er, no. Given your trollish ways, Not Me recognizes that you'd do
>> >> >> a lousy job and would spend more time trying to get the neighborhood
>> >> >> children to pick fights with each other. That or try to hit on all
>> >> >> the hairy big-breasted Jewish women in the area.
>> >>
>> >> > Okay, sweetie.
>> >>
>> >> No, I am not a hairy big-breasted Jewish woman, and no, I will
>> >> never sleep with you, no matter how much you plead, so don't
>> >> bother to waste pillow talk on me.
>>
>> > You misunderstood me. I thought you were a girl, too.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
NOTE THIS WELL.
>>
>> Liar. Bearer of false witness.
>>
>> > Ladies call each other similar names all the time.
>>
>> Given that you're no lady, I fail to see the point.
>>
>> > I apologize. I was just practicing "gay sensitivity".
>>
>> Liar. Bearer of false witness.
>> How does it feel to make the Baby Jesus cry so consistently,
>> oh-self-professed-Christian?
> Queen, Im more of a woman than you.
Of this, I have *absolutely* no doubt.
> I was born this way.
Some idiots are born that way because of lack of oxygen to the
brain during gestation, or because of chemical imbalances.
I'm convinced that your idiocy is well-cultivated and deliberate.
I suppose you should be proud, since you've obviously succeeded
so flagrantly well.
> Im not putting on a
> low grade, homosexual attempt at being female.
Correct. You're putting on a low-grade, asshole troll attempt
at being female and failing miserably.
> So, are you , or are you not the feminine half of a homosexual relationship?
Not; I'm not a lesbian. I am in a homosexual relationship for sure,
though; it's a pity you'll never know what it's like to have *any*
sort of loving relationship. I suppose it's your curse to bear, though.
I'm sure you have no control over the lack of love in your life.
Amy
I would, but we live north of Dallas, so Austin is a bit far for him
to mow your yard. :-)
Amy
Amy
pay for most activities including movie tickets and I would rather him
not have more than that in his pocket. It also means he has to learn
to save if he wants something big. He does.
Perhaps you think kids should be given lots of money? I don't think
its a good idea.
You can call me tight. I prefer to think of it as being a good
parent. Let the parents in Plano throw loads of cash at their kids.
I have more sense than that. He's only 14. He doesn't need more than
that.
Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote in message news:<3CD71557...@hotbot.com>...
Thomas A. Paine
Heck, Greyhound works just fine!
Thomas A. Paine
<nob...@xmailer.ods.org> wrote:
>>
>
>First of all, $10 doesn't go anywhere in this day and time. Duh, you may have got $10 when you
>were a child, it's the year 2002. You shouldn't be so cheap! As a mother, you should make his
>bed & clean his room. You do not teach a young man to do woman's work..What you going to do
>next, have him washing dishes and doing laundry?
Why? So he can grow up and be an unkempt slob like you?
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
>
> > So, are you , or are you not the feminine half of a homosexual relationship?
>
> Not; I'm not a lesbian. I am in a homosexual relationship for sure,
> though;...
So, are you the pitcher, or the catcher, Clay?
Thomas A. Paine
You certainly seem curious about the details of Clay's sex life ...
sure you're not just trolling for details to flesh out your onanistic
fantasies?
Tracey
And, doing work around the home to earn that money is what all kids should do. I pay HS
students to do my lawn to help them out. I could hire some big lawn service, but the kids in
my neighborhood have parents that require work for money, as well. This gives them a little
extra, and they are older teens.
Thomas A. Paine
>No, I think your technique is correct. He does not need more than $10.00 in his pocket.
>And, doing work around the home to earn that money is what all kids should do. I pay HS
>students to do my lawn to help them out. I could hire some big lawn service, but the kids in
>my neighborhood have parents that require work for money, as well. This gives them a little
>extra, and they are older teens.
Shit David, back when I was a high school kid in Southwest Houston
mowing lawns for extra cash, the going rate was $20. And that was $20
years ago, when $20 when a lot further ...
Thomas A. Paine
<nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
>"Thomas A. Paine" <tommy_paine@NO!2SPAMaustin.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:iqpgduool8i3g9hde...@4ax.com...
>LOL @ Tom!! Hey! let me guess, You work 10-hours a day, come home Cook, Do the dishes and Wash
>clothes, while your wife sits home and does nothing but watch soap-operas all day.
>
>Hey Tom, DO YOU DO WINDOWS ALSO? If so I'll invite you over.
>
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the missus and I both work 40+
hour-a-week professional jobs.
While the kitchen is my territory, the missus handles the clothes,
which is a pretty big chore for a family of four.
The missus, myself and the two kids all share in the other household
duties. Including windows.
Thanks for asking.
Cambie
Mister Heex wrote:
> First of all, $10 doesn't go anywhere in this day and time. Duh, you may have got $10 when you
> were a child, it's the year 2002. You shouldn't be so cheap! As a mother, you should make his
> bed & clean his room. You do not teach a young man to do woman's work..What you going to do
> next, have him washing dishes and doing laundry?
what the hell was that all about? it's a shame, he started off so well.
10 bucks really is kind of low. when i was in high school about 8 years
ago i got 20-25 usually.
Clay Colwell
> Clay Colwell wrote:
If you really need explicit details about gay sexuality, Travid, I
recommend _The Joy Of Gay Sex_. Or you could try paying a prostitute
more than $5 to teach you.
BT
er...@hagbard.io.com says...
He knows, he really knows....
BT
--
I think...I think it's in my basement. Let me go upstairs and check.
-M.C. Escher
Clay Colwell
> In article <lh9C8.107269$Ii2.9...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com>,
> er...@hagbard.io.com says...
>> In austin.general Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Clay Colwell wrote:
>>
>> >> > So, are you , or are you not the feminine half of a homosexual relationship?
>> >>
>> >> Not; I'm not a lesbian. I am in a homosexual relationship for sure,
>> >> though;...
>>
>> > So, are you the pitcher, or the catcher, Clay?
>>
>> If you really need explicit details about gay sexuality, Travid, I
>> recommend _The Joy Of Gay Sex_. Or you could try paying a prostitute
>> more than $5 to teach you.
>>
> Clay,
> He knows, he really knows....
Of course it knows. It also thinks that we've forgotten that it
never answered the question about what a "biblical sibling" is,
either. It's quite delusional that way, but at least it's con-
sistent in its persistent need to distract from the issues at hand.
Tracey
"Thomas A. Paine" wrote:
No flesh for fantasy, Mr. Billy Idol. I expect the gay crowd to be proud of what
they do since their lives often center around sexual activity. Let's see how Clay
dodges this minor question:
Tracey
"Thomas A. Paine" wrote:
Just a note, Im not David. Do you own a home? If so, are you paying to have the lawn cut? If
you are, how much are you paying, and who are you paying the money to?
Tracey
Mister Heex wrote:
> "Tracey" <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote in message news:3CD86BE8...@hotbot.com...
> > No, I think your technique is correct. He does not need more than $10.00 in his pocket.
> > And, doing work around the home to earn that money is what all kids should do. I pay HS
> > students to do my lawn to help them out. I could hire some big lawn service, but the kids in
> > my neighborhood have parents that require work for money, as well. This gives them a little
> > extra, and they are older teens.
>
> Tracy, Why don't you find a Man to do your yard work? Just think off it, You would get your
> grass cut, and could have sex, Uh, what else does a girl need? Oh, that other stuff: i.e. love
> and companionship?
>
> Tracy, if you had a man, you could get your grass cut for free, and think of all the money you
> would save on BATTERIES!!
You have to be Gay Clay's alternate name.
Tracey
Clay Colwell
> "Thomas A. Paine" wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 May 2002 23:51:25 GMT, Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Clay Colwell wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > So, are you , or are you not the feminine half of a homosexual relationship?
>> >>
>> >> Not; I'm not a lesbian. I am in a homosexual relationship for sure,
>> >> though;...
>> >
>> >So, are you the pitcher, or the catcher, Clay?
>>
>> You certainly seem curious about the details of Clay's sex life ...
>> sure you're not just trolling for details to flesh out your onanistic
>> fantasies?
> No flesh for fantasy, Mr. Billy Idol.
I quite understand that nothing human is willing to touch your hide,
Travid, at least not without significant financial recompense.
> I expect the gay crowd to be proud of what
> they do since their lives often center around sexual activity.
Given that children are the offspring (heh) of sexual activity, the
same claim is far truer among straight couples who have bred.
> Let's see how Clay
> dodges this minor question:
Oh, child, IKYABWAI is so schoolyard, and you're not even worthy to
touch that, given your incessant ignorings, dodges, and lies. Are
you *completely* unaware that you have no credibility?
Clay Colwell
> Your unwillingness to step up to the plate speaks volumes.......HAHAHAHAHA!
Your request to know explicit details about my sex life is noted,
ridiculed, and trashbinned.
Now, how about that "biblical sibling" definition you promised, troll?
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
No credibility in a newsgroup? Please!
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
Pitcher or catcher, blade?
Thomas A. Paine
Sure David.
I do own my home -- well more correctly, the mortgage company owns it
and I give them money each month toward transfer of said ownership to
me.
I don't pay to get my lawn cut. I'm not afraid of the outdoors or a
little hard work.
Amy
Our situation is similar. In fact, I make more money than my husband,
although he does earn a good living. I'm just a couple of 1000 a year
ahead. Actually, that may have changed. I think he recently got a
promotion and a raise that was bigger than my last raise.
We don't have chores precisely mapped out though. Sometimes he cooks
and sometimes I cook. Most of the time we get fast food because we're
always on the go, unless I put something in the crockpot in the
morning. I prefer to do the laundry myself, because I'm picky about
it and while my son cuts the grass, my husband does the edging because
he's picky about that. So basically it comes down to whoever cares
the most about how a chore gets done is the person that does that
chore.
Rooms generally get picked up the night before the maid comes by the
person who the room belongs to or whomever's stuff is cluttering up
the place.
She's a local, Tracey, before you ask and we pay her what she charges
for a house the size of ours - $70 and she comes every other week.
She doesn't make beds or do laundry or cook or pick up. She's not
with any service like Merry Maids, she's just someone that was
recommended by another neighbor.
Amy
Clay Colwell
> Clay Colwell wrote:
> Pitcher or catcher, blade?
With every dodge you execute, you dig your grave deeper. By all means,
then, continue (although I've no idea how you can damage your credibility
any more than you already have).
Let me add yet another question to the pot: given that my question
is directly related to the issue you brought up, and yet you refuse
to answer it, why should I feel honor-bound to answer a question
you posed which has nothing to do with eithe the issue at hand or
anything I've ever offered on USENET? Goodness knows that I've
never proffered explicit details about my sex life here, and yet
you're *so* curious about it. Why is that, troll? You know I'll
never sleep with you, no matter how often you beg; it's clear to
everyone that the reason you're asking is in the hopes that I'll
be just as enticing to you as those hairy big-bazoomed Jewish babes
you pine for.
Clay Colwell
> Clay Colwell wrote:
>> Oh, child, IKYABWAI is so schoolyard, and you're not even worthy to
>> touch that, given your incessant ignorings, dodges, and lies. Are
>> you *completely* unaware that you have no credibility?
> No credibility in a newsgroup? Please!
You desire no credibility for yourself in these newsgroups? No
need to ask for it; every keystroke you execute ensures that you
maintain no credibility here.
Strong Eagle
home, you do indeed own your home, not the mortgage company. You don't need to ask anyone to sell
it, make changes to it, etc. You guarantee your payment to the mortgage company via a deed of trust
that you executed at closing. This document basically says that if you don't make your payments to
the mortgage company, you agree to give your deed back to the mortgage company. This is much
different than a contract for deed, where title is retained by the finance company. Only people with
extremely poor credit go this route.
Thomas A. Paine
<stron...@motherearth.net> wrote:
>I sure hope you haven't bought your home on a contract for deed. With the normal way of buying a
>home, you do indeed own your home, not the mortgage company. You don't need to ask anyone to sell
>it, make changes to it, etc. You guarantee your payment to the mortgage company via a deed of trust
>that you executed at closing. This document basically says that if you don't make your payments to
>the mortgage company, you agree to give your deed back to the mortgage company. This is much
>different than a contract for deed, where title is retained by the finance company. Only people with
>extremely poor credit go this route.
>
No contract for deed. But as you pointed out, if I stop making
mortgage payments, I have to give the deed back to the mortgage
company ... so I don't really own it, do I?
Strong Eagle
No, you really do own it. You have the right to sell it without asking anyone, or to make modifications.
You paid cash to the seller of your house. You are paying for that cash right now via your mortgage
payments.
Tracey
Amy wrote:
Wow, thats a lot to pay for someone who does not do so much! She could at least do beds and pick up a little! You probably
know her very well, and shes trustworthy, so you wouldn't want to trade her for someone who would do more.
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
You do a good tap dance, Clay. But the question stands:
Are you the pitcher, or the catcher?
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
Oh Clay, you're so full of it! ( which could be dangerous!)
Tracey
"Thomas A. Paine" wrote:
You don't ever own your own home. Not in today's America. You owe taxes every year on that piece of
property. If you stop paying those taxes, well, you know the rest.
Tracey
Generic Poster wrote:
> "Thomas A. Paine" <tommy_paine@NO!2SPAMaustin.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:iqpgduool8i3g9hde...@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 7 May 2002 19:10:01 -0400 (EDT), Mister Heex
> > <nob...@xmailer.ods.org> wrote:
> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >First of all, $10 doesn't go anywhere in this day and time. Duh, you may have got $10 when you
> > >were a child, it's the year 2002. You shouldn't be so cheap! As a mother, you should make his
> > >bed & clean his room. You do not teach a young man to do woman's work..What you going to do
> > >next, have him washing dishes and doing laundry?
> >
> > Why? So he can grow up and be an unkempt slob like you?
> >
> LOL @ Tom!! Hey! let me guess, You work 10-hours a day, come home Cook, Do the dishes and Wash
> clothes, while your wife sits home and does nothing but watch soap-operas all day.
>
> Hey Tom, DO YOU DO WINDOWS ALSO? If so I'll invite you over.
Are you suggesting a working Mr. Mom?
Clay Colwell
> Clay Colwell wrote:
Really? Shall we put it to the public?
Who here thinks Travid has any credibility? For those who do, please
explain why you believe this to be true.
Now let's see the public's opinion.....
Clay Colwell
> Clay Colwell wrote:
Such a compliment that would be, coming from the Master Side-Stepping
Troll, but I'm afraid it wouldn't be true. You see, unlike you, I'm
supporting my position. I've given tons of evidence and examples
that buttress my claims of credibility for myself and refute any
claims you make about your own. All you provide is distraction
and the L'il Sidestep you're so adept at.
> But the question stands:
> Are you the pitcher, or the catcher?
No, the question does *not* stand.
#1) The explicit details of my sex life are, simply put, none
of your business.
#2) In the game of _quid pro quo_, you're so far behind as to
not even show up on the scoreboard.
So, troll, are you ever going to define Traditional Family Values,
as you promised over 2 years ago to do and never did? Are you ever
going to define "biblical sibling", as you promised you would and
never did? I doubt it on both counts; I'm convinced that you simply
want to continue to prove me right and confirm your lack of cred-
ibility. You've been doing a bang-up job so far.
But hey! It's your life and your reputation. They're yours to
bury in the gutter and under the bridge as you see fit.
Thomas A. Paine
<nob...@cotsebay.cotse.net> wrote:
>
>"Thomas A. Paine" <tommy_paine@NO!2SPAMaustin.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:iqpgduool8i3g9hde...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 7 May 2002 19:10:01 -0400 (EDT), Mister Heex
>> <nob...@xmailer.ods.org> wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >First of all, $10 doesn't go anywhere in this day and time. Duh, you may have got $10 when you
>> >were a child, it's the year 2002. You shouldn't be so cheap! As a mother, you should make his
>> >bed & clean his room. You do not teach a young man to do woman's work..What you going to do
>> >next, have him washing dishes and doing laundry?
>>
>> Why? So he can grow up and be an unkempt slob like you?
>>
>LOL @ Tom!! Hey! let me guess, You work 10-hours a day, come home Cook, Do the dishes and Wash
>clothes, while your wife sits home and does nothing but watch soap-operas all day.
Already 'splained to you: we both work full time professional jobs. I
cook and clean the kitchen, she does the laundry and the whole family
does the rest of the chores, inside and out.
>
>Hey Tom, DO YOU DO WINDOWS ALSO? If so I'll invite you over.
Which flavor? 98, ME, NT, 2000, or XP?
I can also handle Solaris, AIX and Linux.
Make sure you have some good import beers in the fridge.
>
>
>
>
Patrick L. Humphrey
>> Clay Colwell wrote:
>>> > Clay Colwell wrote:
Here's my vote:
Travidiot ditched what little credibility he had long ago, back when he was
limited to annoying a few BBSes in Houston.
--PLH, let the landslide start
Lou Minatti®
Travid is a moron. S/h/it's one of those rare Usenet trolls who annoy
literally everyone.
--
Great green globs of greasy grimy gopher guts.
http://www.watchingyou.com
Earl Cooley III
wrote:
>Clay Colwell wrote:
>> In austin.general Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
>> > Clay Colwell wrote:
>> >> In austin.general Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
>> >> > Clay Colwell wrote:
>> >> >> Oh, child, IKYABWAI is so schoolyard, and you're not even worthy to
>> >> >> touch that, given your incessant ignorings, dodges, and lies. Are
>> >> >> you *completely* unaware that you have no credibility?
>> >>
>> >> > No credibility in a newsgroup? Please!
>> >>
>> >> You desire no credibility for yourself in these newsgroups? No
>> >> need to ask for it; every keystroke you execute ensures that you
>> >> maintain no credibility here.
>>
>> > Oh Clay, you're so full of it! ( which could be dangerous!)
>>
>> Really? Shall we put it to the public?
>>
>> Who here thinks Travid has any credibility? For those who do, please
>> explain why you believe this to be true.
>>
>> Now let's see the public's opinion.....
>
>Travid is a moron. S/h/it's one of those rare Usenet trolls who annoy
>literally everyone.
The single point of light in T's favor is that recently, there have
been fewer copyright-violating massive crossposts than before (that
is, unless the other copyright-violating massive crossposts that have
shown up were actually posted by T's sock puppets. Hard to say).
--
e=sc^3 (sh...@io.com) Earl Cooley III
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
Goofball, you don't get it. I don't care what you think about my
credibility. Im here to have fun. What are you here for?
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
Gay Clay, I thought you were Proud! HAHAHA!
"Gay Pride" is just a joke.
Now, are you just too embarrassed to tell us that you're the "Catcher"???
Tracey
"Lou MinattiŽ" wrote:
Its so fun to upset the left. I really do enjoy it.
Tracey
Earl Cooley III wrote:
Im still waiting for one of austin's left leaning perverts to explain his value
system.
For some reason, the commie left is very fearful of talking about the basis for
of its value system.
I will readily admit that I am Ultra Conservative: I believe in the original
interpretation of the US
Constitution. I have no problems discussing the reason why I am Conservative,
but the homosexual, militant, angry, upset, down right jealous of GW radical
left wing will not openly talk about such things.
WHY?
Jeffrey E. Salzberg
> Its so fun to upset the left. I really do enjoy it.
...Then why do you work so hard to also upset your fellow conservatives?
Lou Minatti®
>
> "Lou MinattiŽ" wrote:
>
> > Clay Colwell wrote:
> > >
> > > In austin.general Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Clay Colwell wrote:
> > >
> > > >> In austin.general Tracey <trac...@hotbot.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Clay Colwell wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >> Oh, child, IKYABWAI is so schoolyard, and you're not even worthy to
> > > >> >> touch that, given your incessant ignorings, dodges, and lies. Are
> > > >> >> you *completely* unaware that you have no credibility?
> > > >>
> > > >> > No credibility in a newsgroup? Please!
> > > >>
> > > >> You desire no credibility for yourself in these newsgroups? No
> > > >> need to ask for it; every keystroke you execute ensures that you
> > > >> maintain no credibility here.
> > >
> > > > Oh Clay, you're so full of it! ( which could be dangerous!)
> > >
> > > Really? Shall we put it to the public?
> > >
> > > Who here thinks Travid has any credibility? For those who do, please
> > > explain why you believe this to be true.
> > >
> > > Now let's see the public's opinion.....
> >
> > Travid is a moron. S/h/it's one of those rare Usenet trolls who annoy
> > literally everyone.
>
It's not just the left you annoy, Travid.
Clay Colwell
> Earl Cooley III wrote:
>> On 10 May 2002 02:56:27 GMT, Lou Minatti® <loumi...@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Clay Colwell wrote:
>> >> Now let's see the public's opinion.....
>> >
>> >Travid is a moron. S/h/it's one of those rare Usenet trolls who annoy
>> >literally everyone.
>>
>> The single point of light in T's favor is that recently, there have
>> been fewer copyright-violating massive crossposts than before (that
>> is, unless the other copyright-violating massive crossposts that have
>> shown up were actually posted by T's sock puppets. Hard to say).
>> --
>> e=sc^3 (sh...@io.com) Earl Cooley III
> Im still waiting for one of austin's left leaning perverts to explain
> his value system.
Hmmmm. Which one did you ask? *I* don't see any such question from
you to anyone over the last month along those lines.
> For some reason, the commie left is very fearful of talking about
> the basis for of its value system.
Exactly how many Communists post to austin.general? If you think about
it (yeah, yeah, I know -- lotsa luck), you'd understand what the "some
reason" is.
> I will readily admit that I am Ultra Conservative:
No.
You *claim* to be "Ultra Conservative", but you can't even *define*
it, let alone demonstrate their values.
> I believe in the original interpretation of the US Constitution.
Case in point; what you just said does not define the difference
between conservative and liberal. Indeed, you didn't say much of
*anything*.
> I have no problems discussing the reason why I am Conservative,
Um, you have *lots* of problems. Avoidance, question-dodging,
attempts at distraction, not to mention the lack of evidence,
logic, and thought. Oh, yeah, can't forget the simple lack of
argument, too.
> but the homosexual, militant, angry, upset, down right jealous of GW radical
> left wing will not openly talk about such things.
> WHY?
Because what you keep describing over and over again is a figment of
your imagination, aka a strawman. Of *course* you're going to
keep seeing what you-and-you-alone are seeing if you deliberately
shield yourself from reality.
Clay Colwell
> Goofball, you don't get it. I don't care what you think about my
> credibility. Im here to have fun. What are you here for?
To highlight that, based on this, your every other claim is
shown to be bogus, and your credibility non-existent. Thanks.
You make debate and discussion *so* easy when you roll over
like that.
Tracey
"Jeffrey E. Salzberg" wrote:
Why won't you answer my two questions?
Tracey
"Lou MinattiŽ" wrote:
Theres no way you're suggesting that you're conservative!
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
Clay, all of that carping for nothing.
Tracey
Clay Colwell wrote:
Clay, step up to the plate: Are you the pitcher, or the catcher?
Patrick L. Humphrey
>"Lou MinattiŽ" wrote:
>> It's not just the left you annoy, Travid.
>Theres no way you're suggesting that you're conservative!
He was a stated conservative quite a bit before YOU came along, Travidiot.
(Some of us have functional memories, you know.)
--PLH, gladder than ever I've never had anything to do with RoadRunner
Clay Colwell
> Clay, all of that carping for nothing.
You know something? You're right, for once in a myriad tries.
I've been trying to educate you, despite the fact that I *know*
you behave the way you do willfully. I'll try to convince myself
that I'm providing a PSA, rather than trying to teach your piggish
self to sing.
Clay Colwell
> Clay Colwell wrote:
As I've stated before, the explicit details of my sex life
are none of your business, since you will never be part of
my sex life.
Also remember that your continued carping on this question continues
to highlight your utter lack of credibility. Glad you're having
fun while doing it!
Clay Colwell
> Clay Colwell wrote:
The joke is in your understanding (well, lack thereof) of the
purpose of *any* sort of "<n> Pride" event.
> Now, are you just too embarrassed to tell us that you're the "Catcher"???
No. Read what I wrote: it's none of your business, as you will
never be part of my sex life. (I'm sure you hear that a lot,
especially from the poor soul who may have consented to be your
spouse.)
Mapanari
"Tracey" <teas...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ozKC8.70631$9F5.3...@typhoon.austin.rr.com...
>
>
> Earl Cooley III wrote:
>
snip
> > The single point of light in T's favor is that recently, there have
> > been fewer copyright-violating massive crossposts than before (that
> > is, unless the other copyright-violating massive crossposts that have
> > shown up were actually posted by T's sock puppets. Hard to say).
> > --
> > e=sc^3 (sh...@io.com) Earl Cooley III
>
> Im still waiting for one of austin's left leaning perverts to explain his
value
> system.
> For some reason, the commie left is very fearful of talking about the
basis for
> of its value system.
>
> I will readily admit that I am Ultra Conservative: I believe in the
original
> interpretation of the US
> Constitution. I have no problems discussing the reason why I am
Conservative,
> but the homosexual, militant, angry, upset, down right jealous of GW
radical
> left wing will not openly talk about such things.
>
> WHY?
>
>
I'm a libertarian conservative and I dislike GW intensely, as I think he's a
lying incompetent wussie boy just like his daddy.
Does that make me a homosexual left wing....radical?
Since I have nipples, can you milk me, Tracey?
If you're an avowed conservative does that automatically mean yu're pro
death penalty, anti-abortion, pro GW and a christian?
Most people fall in between those characteristics of the radical moronic
right and simpering socialist left.
When people like you are so narrow minded and one-tracked no one listens to
you because we already know every single one of your positions and every
single thought in your head.
There are no surprises, nothing to debate about, nothing to be informed or
to ponder because people like you are so rigid and set in your ways that any
attempt at rational logical discussion is an exercise in futility.
I freely admit I myself am pretty set in my ways and my thinking processes
are pretty set, but I also admit that I am capable of changing my mind if
presented with overwhelming logical evidence to the contrary
The problem is is that not many people can present overwhelming logical
evidence to show me that angels don't do tricks in heaven, that abstinence
is anything but a moronic christian idiocy advocated by sexually perverted
and frustrated christian parents, that spending more than you make is
stupid, that balance of trade deficits are a bad thing and that taxes are a
necessary evil but are still evil.
Right wing, left wing...blah blah blah.....just examples of blithering
morons who couldn't explain a mental logic loop if their life depended on
it.
And what does one's sexuality have to do with one's left/right wing idiocy?
Ever hear of the Log Cabin Republicans?
mapi
--
Email the Doctor!
Mapa...@hotmail.delete-this.com
A mind is a terrible thing....
Jeffrey E. Salzberg
er...@hagbard.io.com says...
> Exactly how many Communists post to austin.general? If you think about
> it (yeah, yeah, I know -- lotsa luck), you'd understand what the "some
> reason" is.
Well, are you talking about David's definition, or that of a sane,
intelligent person?
Jeffrey E. Salzberg
Because your questions assume as fact that which is not true.
When will *you* start answering questions?
Earl Cooley III
>I will readily admit that I am Ultra Conservative: I believe in the original
>interpretation of the US Constitution.
You mean, "Original" as in pre-"Marbury vs. Madison"? Most people
prefer Extra-Crispy....
http://www.jmu.edu/madison/marbury/background.htm
Thomas A. Paine
>
>I will readily admit that I am Ultra Conservative: I believe in the original
>interpretation of the US
>Constitution.
Is that so?
I suppose, then, you would prefer the original interpretation that
women not have the right to vote?
And I suppose, then, that you would prefer the original interpretation
that when it comes to apportion, "other persons" should be counted as
3/5 of a "free person"?
And you'll no doubt want to leave it to the state legislature to pick
your senator?
And, no doubt, you want the Vice President to be the person with the
second-highest number of votes?
Of course, you'll also want the President to be in charge of only the
Army, Navy and various state militias?
>
BT
tommy_paine@NO!2SPAMaustin.rr.com says...
BT--
I think...I think it's in my basement. Let me go upstairs and check.
-M.C. Escher
Lou Minatti®
Yes, I am, but not your brand of conservatism. In fact, you're not a
true conservative - you're simply a far-right kook who trolls for angry
responses by posting stupid messages.
Dusty Rhodes
news:ozKC8.70631$9F5.3...@typhoon.austin.rr.com...
> I will readily admit that I am Ultra Conservative: I believe in the
original
> interpretation of the US
> Constitution.
Will you still readily admit you're a female attorney from Houston? Or was
that just another Big Lie?
Cheers,
Dusty
--
Check out my Weblog, 'Everything...Possible...Happens.,' for news and views
from more than 2000 different news feeds updated hourly.
http://radio.weblogs.com/0105714/
Tracey12
So, "your fellow conservatives" would indicate that you truly are a
leftist democrat.
Tracey12
Clay, don't get so wrapped up in yourself. Im here to have fun. If you don't
want to tell us whether or not you're the "catcher", thats fine. We
understand.
Tracey12
What do you think about the lastest report from the federal government
that suggests all homosexuals should be HIV tested each year?
Dusty Rhodes
news:3CDC8E91...@hotbot.com...
Why don't you tell us more about your extensive experience as a female
attorney in Houston, Travidiot?
Tracey12
Austin Commies: radical, militant marxists who have congregated in Austin.
Tracey12
> In article <3CDBD4DA...@mine.com>, m...@mine.com says...
>
>>
>>"Jeffrey E. Salzberg" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <3CDB733F...@aol.com>, teas...@aol.com says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Its so fun to upset the left. I really do enjoy it.
>>>>
>>>...Then why do you work so hard to also upset your fellow conservatives?
>>>
>>Why won't you answer my two questions?
>>
>
> Because your questions assume as fact that which is not true.
>
> When will *you* start answering questions?
>
Really? I only asked you this:
1. Do you support abortion on demand?
2. Do you support gay rights?
You are a liberal depending on how you answer these.
Tracey12
Sure. That would pickle the commie libs, wouldn't it?
No radical feminazis to vote for algore! OH NO! Abortion would be
outlawed in 10 minutes. The borders would be clamped and mexico would
be mad as heck. Good.
But, the truth is, Im Ultra Conservative, and I support the original
intent which is very very limited government well under the control of
We the People.
I look forward to the day when America will have one Austin commie left.
We will be able to point to him and say, "This is what nearly
destroyed America years ago."
All we have to do is teach them the truth, and keep them off dope.
Tracey12
HAHA! Well, in that case, you took the bait! HAHA!
Tracey12
HAHAHA! You have the audacity to talk about lies! HAHAHAHA!
Dusty Rhodes
Travid, step up to the plate: Are you or are you not a female attorney
practicing in Houston, as you have claimed here and elsewhere so many times
before? Yes or no will suffice.
What's the matter, you stupid goof, cat got your tongue? Too stupid to
figure out the question? Just a lying coward?
As likely as the the second possibility is, I ogtta go with the last option.
So, having fun yet, Travidiot? Perhaps we should let some of your many
previous legal system contacts in on your latest fun and games, eh?
Clay Colwell
> "Tracey" <teas...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:ozKC8.70631$9F5.3...@typhoon.austin.rr.com...
>> I will readily admit that I am Ultra Conservative: I believe in the
> original
>> interpretation of the US
>> Constitution.
> Will you still readily admit you're a female attorney from Houston? Or was
> that just another Big Lie?
If its fingers are typing, Travid's telling Yet Another Big Lie.
Dusty Rhodes
> What do you think about the lastest report from the federal government
> that suggests all homosexuals should be HIV tested each year?
What do you think about lying shithead morons who stupidly claim to be
female attorneys?
Clay Colwell
Of which, exactly how many are posting to austin.general?
Dusty Rhodes
news:Q61D8.95108$M7.88...@bin7.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
Yes, but not all of s/h/it's lies carry such serious legal repercussions.
It's illegal to impersonate an officer of the court, you know. No doubt
Travid could provide you with details of the consequences for said
stupidity, were he not such a moronic, lying shithead.
Clay Colwell
>> On Fri, 10 May 2002 07:23:00 GMT, Tracey <teas...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I will readily admit that I am Ultra Conservative: I believe in the original
>>>interpretation of the US
>>>Constitution.
>>
>> Is that so?
>>
>> I suppose, then, you would prefer the original interpretation that
>> women not have the right to vote?
[...]
> Sure. That would pickle the commie libs, wouldn't it?
> No radical feminazis to vote for algore! OH NO! Abortion would be
> outlawed in 10 minutes. The borders would be clamped and mexico would
> be mad as heck. Good.
Leave it to the self-professed female attorney and luster after
big-breasted hairy Jewish women to support the removal of "her"
suffrage. *Damn*, but you're a funny troll.
Clay Colwell
>> As I've stated before, the explicit details of my sex life
>> are none of your business, since you will never be part of
>> my sex life.
>>
>> Also remember that your continued carping on this question continues
>> to highlight your utter lack of credibility. Glad you're having
>> fun while doing it!
> What do you think about the lastest report from the federal government
> that suggests all homosexuals should be HIV tested each year?
What of it? Don't you think that *any* sexually active person
should be HIV tested each year? (And leave it to you to misquote
your own article -- it didn't say "all homosexuals". Do you
even bother to read the entirety of the articles you quote?
Even the first paragraph (since that's where it was noted that
the recommendation was for "sexually active" gay people)?)