Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Trayvon Martin : Why So Much Emphasis On This Shooting?
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Tracey12
Mar 24, 2012, 1:45:39 PM3/24/12
to
Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
The answer is very apparent when Obama's response is factored in.
The Welfare Pimps who are trying to keep this story alive are looking
for live cameras and an opportunity to remind the public that they are
the black leaders, and they represent the entire black population of
America. By warning of coming retaliation / riots, the Welfare Pimps
are trying to demonstrate their power and control.
But, the part that is not being reported is that Obama and the Welfare
Pimps are trying hard to draw in black support for Obama, and that is
exactly why Obama made the remark about if he had a son, he would look
like Trayvon.
circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
The answer is very apparent when Obama's response is factored in.
The Welfare Pimps who are trying to keep this story alive are looking
for live cameras and an opportunity to remind the public that they are
the black leaders, and they represent the entire black population of
America. By warning of coming retaliation / riots, the Welfare Pimps
are trying to demonstrate their power and control.
But, the part that is not being reported is that Obama and the Welfare
Pimps are trying hard to draw in black support for Obama, and that is
exactly why Obama made the remark about if he had a son, he would look
like Trayvon.
wy
Mar 24, 2012, 2:17:51 PM3/24/12
to
On Mar 24, 1:45 pm, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
Because you're too stupid to get it and they want to keep ramming it
> Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
down your throat until you gag and do get it.
Poor Repressed, Deprived, Victimized RepublicLoons
Mar 24, 2012, 2:26:08 PM3/24/12
to
Loons on sight.
Open season on rodent retards !
They really are the scum of America.
--
--> Slow thinkers --> Stay Right
Loon Party: http://www.twitpic.com/8zi369/full
Tracey12
Mar 24, 2012, 2:29:40 PM3/24/12
to
On Mar 24, 1:26 pm, "Poor Repressed, Deprived, Victimized
Yes, you radicalized nuts are all a Twitter about killing people on
the Right. I think you're all talk and buffalo manure.
the Right. I think you're all talk and buffalo manure.
Message has been deleted
Al
Mar 24, 2012, 3:29:59 PM3/24/12
to
In article <el5sm79f3nf7cgqse...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> >circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
You can shoot whites and Asians too.
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> >circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
You can shoot whites and Asians too.
Tracey12
Mar 24, 2012, 3:39:43 PM3/24/12
to
On Mar 24, 1:47 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> >circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> >Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> >circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
Many states including Texas have the same right to use force to stop
> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
an attacker. Did they all pass the Castle law so they could shoot
blacks?
That is the dumbest thing I think you've ever said in these groups.
Juan Hungloe
Mar 24, 2012, 3:56:00 PM3/24/12
to
On Mar 24, 1:47 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> >circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> >circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
Hmmm. Looks like I'll be vacationing in Florida this year !!
> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
Juan Hungloe
Mar 24, 2012, 3:55:10 PM3/24/12
to
Ramon F Herrera
Mar 24, 2012, 4:04:19 PM3/24/12
to
Without the press coverage (thank God for FREE press!!) the assassin
would have gone free, not even detained.
-Ramon
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Tracey12
Mar 24, 2012, 5:30:13 PM3/24/12
to
At the moment, you're simply regurgitating the commie pov.
Ramon F Herrera
Mar 24, 2012, 5:34:33 PM3/24/12
to
The fact that you (an overt racist, whose only occupation is spreading
hatred (*)) and your cohorts try to defend the murderer, by itself is
justification for the national attention.
-Ramon
(*) When you are not attacking FREE enterprise and FREE press.
Paul Duca
Mar 24, 2012, 6:15:21 PM3/24/12
to
hooded sweatshirt made him partly at fault--it's automatically assumed
that makes you a criminal or a gang member or anything worthy of being
shot.
Paul
Tracey12
Mar 24, 2012, 6:24:35 PM3/24/12
to
president.
Walter E. Williams and Thomas H. Sowell are fantastic Americans who
are black and as conservative as me. They would be marvelous
presidents.
You support an invasion of the United States of America because you
are a know-nothing foreigner from a brown, 3rd world communist dump.
Out of guilt, you want so called immigration reform passed that would
allow up to 30,000,000 illegals to keep their illegal rumps in the
USA. The vast majority of Americans disagree with you. Kindly shut
your mouth and do your job. You are essentially a guest here.
Al
Mar 24, 2012, 6:37:52 PM3/24/12
to
In article <53fsm7tit2pa1e9ni...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:29:59 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
> >
> >
> >You can shoot whites and Asians too.
>
> Wanna bet that you could count on one finger the number of whites who
> get shot legally?
I'd wager that racial representation in the blown-away community would echo
general crime statistics by race in the population as a whole.
All studies show that permitted carriers are a more law-abiding group than
the general population, and that even non-carriers benefit from carry laws
through reduced rates of violent crime.
==
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:29:59 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
> >
> >
> >You can shoot whites and Asians too.
>
> get shot legally?
I'd wager that racial representation in the blown-away community would echo
general crime statistics by race in the population as a whole.
All studies show that permitted carriers are a more law-abiding group than
the general population, and that even non-carriers benefit from carry laws
through reduced rates of violent crime.
==
wy
Mar 24, 2012, 6:42:25 PM3/24/12
to
On Mar 24, 6:24 pm, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 4:34 pm, Ramon F Herrera <gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>
> > The fact that you (an overt racist, whose only occupation is spreading
> > hatred (*)) and your cohorts try to defend the murderer, by itself is
> > justification for the national attention.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> > (*) When you are not attacking FREE enterprise and FREE press.
>
> Who is an overt racist? I am profoundly in support of black men being
> president.
Yeah, we can see that.
> On Mar 24, 4:34 pm, Ramon F Herrera <gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>
> > The fact that you (an overt racist, whose only occupation is spreading
> > hatred (*)) and your cohorts try to defend the murderer, by itself is
> > justification for the national attention.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> > (*) When you are not attacking FREE enterprise and FREE press.
>
> Who is an overt racist? I am profoundly in support of black men being
> president.
>
> Walter E. Williams and Thomas H. Sowell are fantastic Americans who
> are black and as conservative as me. They would be marvelous
> presidents.
>
> You support an invasion of the United States of America because you
> are a know-nothing foreigner from a brown, 3rd world communist dump.
> Out of guilt, you want so called immigration reform passed that would
> allow up to 30,000,000 illegals to keep their illegal rumps in the
> USA. The vast majority of Americans disagree with you. Kindly shut
> your mouth and do your job. You are essentially a guest here.
boy. Or are yo a skank momma? Cain't tell wit' dat sexually
ambiguous name yo got yoself.
Ramon F Herrera
Mar 24, 2012, 6:48:00 PM3/24/12
to
On Mar 24, 5:24 pm, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 4:34 pm, Ramon F Herrera <gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>
> > The fact that you (an overt racist, whose only occupation is spreading
> > hatred (*)) and your cohorts try to defend the murderer, by itself is
> > justification for the national attention.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> > (*) When you are not attacking FREE enterprise and FREE press.
>
> Who is an overt racist?
Ooooops, my mistake! I apologize profusely for having called you
> On Mar 24, 4:34 pm, Ramon F Herrera <gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>
> > The fact that you (an overt racist, whose only occupation is spreading
> > hatred (*)) and your cohorts try to defend the murderer, by itself is
> > justification for the national attention.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> > (*) When you are not attacking FREE enterprise and FREE press.
>
> Who is an overt racist?
"overt racist".
What I should have said is "hypocrite racist".
It is hard to keep track of youse.
-Ramon
Al
Mar 24, 2012, 7:20:39 PM3/24/12
to
In article
<8fa95ee6-c011-4f8c...@12g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
racist.
Problem solved.
<8fa95ee6-c011-4f8c...@12g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
Ramon F Herrera <gopo...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>
> What I should have said is "hypocrite racist".
>
> It is hard to keep track of youse.
>
Not really, Ramon. Just label anyone who disagrees with your agenda as
>
> What I should have said is "hypocrite racist".
>
> It is hard to keep track of youse.
>
racist.
Problem solved.
Message has been deleted
duke
Mar 25, 2012, 8:23:28 AM3/25/12
to
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:47:49 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
>>circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
>>blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
>
>>Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
>>circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
>>blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
robbing them.
duke, American - American
*****
1 John 3:4-6
4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
appeared so that he might take away our sins.
And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
sin has either seen him or known him.
*****
duke
Mar 25, 2012, 8:23:57 AM3/25/12
to
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:29:04 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 24, 1:47 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>>>
>>> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
>>> >circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
>>> >blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>>>
>>> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
>>> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
>>
>>Many states including Texas have the same right to use force to stop
>>an attacker.
>
>Travon was retreating
Were you kissing his ass at the time?
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 24, 1:47 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>>>
>>> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
>>> >circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
>>> >blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>>>
>>> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
>>> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
>>
>>Many states including Texas have the same right to use force to stop
>>an attacker.
>
Were you kissing his ass at the time?
duke
Mar 25, 2012, 8:24:57 AM3/25/12
to
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:28:35 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:29:59 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:29:59 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
>>> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
>>
>>
>>You can shoot whites and Asians too.
>
>>> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
>>
>>
>>You can shoot whites and Asians too.
>
>Wanna bet that you could count on one finger the number of whites who
>get shot legally?
We don't break the law like negroes do.
>get shot legally?
Bradley K. Sherman
Mar 25, 2012, 8:25:59 AM3/25/12
to
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:47:49 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
>>>circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
>>>blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>>
>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
>robbing them.
>
Did they claim self-defense?
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:47:49 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
>>>circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
>>>blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>>
>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
>robbing them.
>
---bks
Alan Ferris
Mar 25, 2012, 8:31:29 AM3/25/12
to
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:23:57 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>Many states including Texas have the same right to use force to stop
>>>an attacker.
>>
>>Travon was retreating
>
>Were you kissing his ass at the time?
It is great how so called pro-life catholics support murder.
>>>Many states including Texas have the same right to use force to stop
>>>an attacker.
>>
>>Travon was retreating
>
>Were you kissing his ass at the time?
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no. "
-Duke (Earl Weber),
explaining why it was patriotic for
him to skip out on Vietnam, 3/30/2004
Alan Ferris
Mar 25, 2012, 8:36:11 AM3/25/12
to
crime. No. Just another pro-life catholic supporting murder.
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Paul Duca
Mar 25, 2012, 9:07:39 AM3/25/12
to
On Mar 25, 8:36 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:25:59 +0000 (UTC), b...@panix.com (Bradley K.
>
>
>
> Sherman) wrote:
> >duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:25:59 +0000 (UTC), b...@panix.com (Bradley K.
>
>
>
> Sherman) wrote:
> >>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:47:49 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >>>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> >>><tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> >>>>circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >>>>blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> >>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
> >>robbing them.
>
> >Did they claim self-defense?
>
> Indeed, are they walking free due to the police not investigating the
> crime. No. Just another pro-life catholic supporting murder.
>
>
It's only the death of a worthless darkie who sooner or later, would
>
> >>>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> >>><tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> >>>>circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >>>>blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> >>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
> >>robbing them.
>
> >Did they claim self-defense?
>
> Indeed, are they walking free due to the police not investigating the
> crime. No. Just another pro-life catholic supporting murder.
>
>
have caused trouble for perfect white Catholic Republicans like Duke.
Paul
Richard Steel
Mar 25, 2012, 9:13:50 AM3/25/12
to
> > Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> > circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> > blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
> Because you're too stupid to get it and they want to keep ramming it
> down your throat until you gag and do get it.
Here's your problem - Zimmerman is Hispanic, not white. Are you guys
> down your throat until you gag and do get it.
trying to start a race war between Blacks and Hispanics?
Richard Steel
Mar 25, 2012, 9:15:20 AM3/25/12
to
> > Because you're too stupid to get it and they want to keep ramming it
> > down your throat until you gag and do get it.
> I think it is time we start murdering
> > down your throat until you gag and do get it.
> Loons on sight.
> Open season on rodent retards !
> They really are the scum of America.
This is sort of like the 60s happening all over again. How did the
60s riots end up? Oh, right, they got Richard Nixon elected, and re-
elected in a landslide.
Paul Duca
Mar 25, 2012, 9:06:18 AM3/25/12
to
On Mar 25, 8:24 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:28:35 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:29:59 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com>
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:28:35 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:29:59 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
>
> >>> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >>You can shoot whites and Asians too.
>
> >Wanna bet that you could count on one finger the number of whites who
> >get shot legally?
>
> We don't break the law like negroes have no other capacity to do.
>
> >>> Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>> "defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >>You can shoot whites and Asians too.
>
> >Wanna bet that you could count on one finger the number of whites who
> >get shot legally?
>
Billary
Mar 25, 2012, 8:52:09 AM3/25/12
to
his Mexican gang banger cousins who hate everything other than
Carnals. Es verdad pendjo ramon no?
It's really too bad that Trayvon martin didn't have a concealed weapon
with him. He'd be alive today if he had. ALL AMERICANS should be
able to walk the streets without fear from their safety. Free from
fear of trailer trash Rednecks, Mexican Gangbanger drug whores, and
Black Hoddie mafia thugs.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Al
Mar 25, 2012, 10:18:32 AM3/25/12
to
In article <kv3um7dutvi87rd75...@4ax.com>,
Alan Ferris <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:23:57 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>>Many states including Texas have the same right to use force to stop
> >>>an attacker.
> >>
> >>Travon was retreating
> >
> >Were you kissing his ass at the time?
>
> It is great how so called pro-life catholics support murder.
You've decided it was murder?
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:23:57 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>>Many states including Texas have the same right to use force to stop
> >>>an attacker.
> >>
> >>Travon was retreating
> >
> >Were you kissing his ass at the time?
>
> It is great how so called pro-life catholics support murder.
George Kerby
Mar 25, 2012, 10:19:24 AM3/25/12
to
On 3/25/12 8:13 AM, in article
fbbc4716-92b8-43f2...@i2g2000vbv.googlegroups.com, "Richard
Al
Mar 25, 2012, 10:19:54 AM3/25/12
to
Al
Mar 25, 2012, 10:21:24 AM3/25/12
to
In article <769um7l7rok5p1oal...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:23:28 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
> >
> >What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home
> >before
> >robbing them.
> >
>
> Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
> (all legal, of course)
Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:23:28 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
> >
> >What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home
> >before
> >robbing them.
> >
>
> (all legal, of course)
Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
First. Post
Mar 25, 2012, 10:25:25 AM3/25/12
to
with the greatest number of white supremecy organizations.
Richard Steel
Mar 25, 2012, 10:09:16 AM3/25/12
to
On Mar 25, 7:01 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel
> Zimmerloon is white
No, Zimmerman is Hispanic. I mean, I understand that you need a white
guy to hate right now, but that doesn't change the fact that he's
Hispanic.
Now, you might be able to lie to yourself and your buddies, and the
Legacy Media talks about Zimmerman being a "white Hispanic" - but the
result is the same. The Left is trying to start a race war in
America, with the Blacks pitted against the Browns.
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel
No, Zimmerman is Hispanic. I mean, I understand that you need a white
guy to hate right now, but that doesn't change the fact that he's
Hispanic.
Now, you might be able to lie to yourself and your buddies, and the
Legacy Media talks about Zimmerman being a "white Hispanic" - but the
result is the same. The Left is trying to start a race war in
America, with the Blacks pitted against the Browns.
Richard Steel
Mar 25, 2012, 10:33:23 AM3/25/12
to
On Mar 25, 7:01 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel
>
> <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel
>
> <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
>
Zimmerman is half Jewish, half Mexican. And he looks Mexican.
So, which group that the Democrats desperately need to win in November
do you wish to demonize?
Al
Mar 25, 2012, 11:01:06 AM3/25/12
to
In article <k79um7tiucn3dgvkc...@4ax.com>,
> Zimmerloon is white
>
> In case you don't know it---the war against blacks by white
> conservatives has NEVER stopped, Steelloon
They are very ineffective compared to Hispanics and fellow blacks.
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel
>
> In case you don't know it---the war against blacks by white
> conservatives has NEVER stopped, Steelloon
They are very ineffective compared to Hispanics and fellow blacks.
Ramon F. Herrera
Mar 25, 2012, 11:04:11 AM3/25/12
to
On Mar 24, 6:20 pm, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <8fa95ee6-c011-4f8c-8f18-b90434bfc...@12g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
Tracey is a well-known spreader of hatred.
-Ramon
> In article
> <8fa95ee6-c011-4f8c-8f18-b90434bfc...@12g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
> Ramon F Herrera <gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > What I should have said is "hypocrite racist".
>
> > It is hard to keep track of youse.
>
> Not really, Ramon. Just label anyone who disagrees
> with your agenda as racist.
>
> Problem solved.
I haven't labeled you -or scores of others.
>
>
>
> > What I should have said is "hypocrite racist".
>
> > It is hard to keep track of youse.
>
> Not really, Ramon. Just label anyone who disagrees
> with your agenda as racist.
>
> Problem solved.
Tracey is a well-known spreader of hatred.
-Ramon
Message has been deleted
Juan Hungloe
Mar 25, 2012, 11:30:33 AM3/25/12
to
On Mar 25, 9:01 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel
>
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel
>
> Zimmerloon is white
>
> In case you don't know it---the war against blacks by white
> conservatives has NEVER stopped, Steelloon
>
> It just manifests itself in a different way to circumvent the law
>
> In case you don't know it---the war against blacks by white
> conservatives has NEVER stopped, Steelloon
>
>
> Whether it's Aschcroft trying, or the GOP trying
>
> White power is still at it.
Zimmerman,like your President,is a half-breed. Mother is
Peruvian,father is white. We all know it's the Jewish name that gets
your blood pressure into the red zone.
Juan Hungloe
Mar 25, 2012, 11:29:11 AM3/25/12
to
On Mar 25, 9:00 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
because of something that happened 50+ years ago?? Would you feel the
same way if it were your nother,sister,daughter or any member of your
family that was murdered by blacks in retaliation for something that
hasn't happened in decades?
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:23:28 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
> >robbing them.
>
> >>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
> >robbing them.
>
> Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
> (all legal, of course)
So you think it's perfectly ok for blacks to rape and murder whites
> (all legal, of course)
because of something that happened 50+ years ago?? Would you feel the
same way if it were your nother,sister,daughter or any member of your
family that was murdered by blacks in retaliation for something that
hasn't happened in decades?
duke
Mar 25, 2012, 12:32:52 PM3/25/12
to
every day.
duke
Mar 25, 2012, 12:36:14 PM3/25/12
to
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:00:09 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:23:28 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
>>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>>
>>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
>>robbing them.
>>
>
on the national news? Did you see all the negroes in NY demonstrating about it?
Where any wearing hoodies? Why not?
The 5 negroes gonna burn.
>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:23:28 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
>>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>>
>>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
>>robbing them.
>>
>
>Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
>(all legal, of course)
What's the matter, yoogie. This was just a month ago. Did you heard about it
>(all legal, of course)
on the national news? Did you see all the negroes in NY demonstrating about it?
Where any wearing hoodies? Why not?
The 5 negroes gonna burn.
duke
Mar 25, 2012, 12:36:53 PM3/25/12
to
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:29:11 -0700 (PDT), Juan Hungloe <hoofhe...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Yoogie doesn't care about that. He's sick in the head.
wrote:
duke
Mar 25, 2012, 12:38:06 PM3/25/12
to
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:15:57 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:30:13 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 24, 3:04 pm, Ramon F Herrera <gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>>> Without the press coverage (thank God for FREE press!!) the assassin
>>> would have gone free, not even detained.
>>>
>>> -Ramon
>>
>>Better read Drudge today so that youre fully informed.
>
>Don't have to
>
>I know to flush after taking a shit.
You didn't go round the bowl and down the hole, roll yoogie roll.
>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:30:13 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 24, 3:04 pm, Ramon F Herrera <gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>>> Without the press coverage (thank God for FREE press!!) the assassin
>>> would have gone free, not even detained.
>>>
>>> -Ramon
>>
>>Better read Drudge today so that youre fully informed.
>
>Don't have to
>
>I know to flush after taking a shit.
You didn't go round the bowl and down the hole, roll yoogie roll.
Al
Mar 25, 2012, 3:16:16 PM3/25/12
to
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Alan Ferris
Mar 25, 2012, 5:06:24 PM3/25/12
to
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:18:32 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
wrote:
damn right, he had no need to pursue and shoot an unarmed kid.
had the kid been following him I would support his right to claim
defence.
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
wrote:
had the kid been following him I would support his right to claim
defence.
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)
Mar 25, 2012, 5:35:50 PM3/25/12
to
On Mar 25, 12:32 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:25:59 +0000 (UTC), b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:25:59 +0000 (UTC), b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:47:49 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >>>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> >>><tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> >>>>circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >>>>blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> >>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
> >>robbing them.
> >Did they claim self-defense?
>
> They usually do find a way to blame somebody else. If you go through the motions of "taking responsibility",
>
> >>>On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> >>><tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>Travon is dead. We know who shot him. We know most of the
> >>>>circumstances surrounding the shooting. Yet, why is this event being
> >>>>blown up into a major national news story and potential riot?
>
> >>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
> >>robbing them.
> >Did they claim self-defense?
>
> you can pretend that God will reward you for it.
Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)
Mar 25, 2012, 5:35:13 PM3/25/12
to
On Mar 25, 12:36 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:00:09 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:00:09 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:23:28 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
> >>robbing them.
>
> >Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
> >(all legal, of course)
>
> What's the matter, yoogie. This was just a month ago. Did you heard about it
> on the national news? Did you see all the negroes in NY demonstrating about it?
> Where any wearing hoodies? Why not?
>
> The 5 negroes gonna burn. Won't make my life any better....
>
> >>>Because the NRA sponsored FL law was passed to make shooting blacks
> >>>"defensible", you dumb asshole.
>
> >>What about 5 negroes cutting the throats of 3 white people in their home before
> >>robbing them.
>
> >Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
> >(all legal, of course)
>
> What's the matter, yoogie. This was just a month ago. Did you heard about it
> on the national news? Did you see all the negroes in NY demonstrating about it?
> Where any wearing hoodies? Why not?
>
Al
Mar 25, 2012, 5:41:17 PM3/25/12
to
In article <s7tum79r4rbjpjpko...@4ax.com>,
>
> It's a question of you inferring that blacks have no reason to claim
> unfair
Yes, black people have had to deal with some very unfair circumstances.
That settles that.
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:21:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:21:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
> >> (all legal, of course)
> >
> >
> >Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
>
> Not a question of payback
> >> (all legal, of course)
> >
> >
> >Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
>
>
> It's a question of you inferring that blacks have no reason to claim
> unfair
Yes, black people have had to deal with some very unfair circumstances.
That settles that.
duke
Mar 26, 2012, 7:54:49 AM3/26/12
to
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:47:23 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:18:32 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:18:32 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>> It is great how so called pro-life catholics support murder.
>>
>>You've decided it was murder?
>
>
>Even Jeb Bush---ardent support of that racist gunloon law---believes
>>
>>You've decided it was murder?
>
>
>it is so.
He's not the judge.
duke
Mar 26, 2012, 7:55:21 AM3/26/12
to
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:42:25 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:21:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:21:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>> Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
>>> (all legal, of course)
>>
>>
>>Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
>
>>> (all legal, of course)
>>
>>
>>Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
>
>Not a question of payback
>
>It's a question of you inferring that blacks have no reason to claim
>unfair
That's all they do. It's always somebody else's fault.
>
>It's a question of you inferring that blacks have no reason to claim
>unfair
duke
Mar 26, 2012, 7:56:18 AM3/26/12
to
>
>That settles that.
Alan Ferris
Mar 26, 2012, 8:50:47 AM3/26/12
to
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:54:49 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:47:23 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:18:32 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>> It is great how so called pro-life catholics support murder.
>>>
>>>You've decided it was murder?
>>
>>
>>Even Jeb Bush---ardent support of that racist gunloon law---believes
>>it is so.
>
>He's not the judge.
But it cannot get to a judge if the police do not do their job
>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:47:23 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:18:32 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>> It is great how so called pro-life catholics support murder.
>>>
>>>You've decided it was murder?
>>
>>
>>Even Jeb Bush---ardent support of that racist gunloon law---believes
>>it is so.
>
>He's not the judge.
correctly.
Al
Mar 26, 2012, 10:03:40 AM3/26/12
to
In article <i9m0n7p9tc6qbuh6b...@4ax.com>,
their own failures.
To them, their blackness is a crutch and a meal ticket.
This is the legacy of liberalism's devastating effect on the black community.
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:41:17 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <s7tum79r4rbjpjpko...@4ax.com>,
> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:21:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
> >> >> (all legal, of course)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
> >>
> >> Not a question of payback
> >>
> >> It's a question of you inferring that blacks have no reason to claim
> >> unfair
> >
> >
> >Yes, black people have had to deal with some very unfair circumstances.
>
> And now they want "repirations".
Some of them do, the Marxist blacks who want others to bear the burden of
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:41:17 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <s7tum79r4rbjpjpko...@4ax.com>,
> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:21:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
> >> >> (all legal, of course)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
> >>
> >> Not a question of payback
> >>
> >> It's a question of you inferring that blacks have no reason to claim
> >> unfair
> >
> >
> >Yes, black people have had to deal with some very unfair circumstances.
>
> And now they want "repirations".
their own failures.
To them, their blackness is a crutch and a meal ticket.
This is the legacy of liberalism's devastating effect on the black community.
Al
Mar 26, 2012, 10:46:50 AM3/26/12
to
In article <fgp0n7pj64ealeekt...@4ax.com>,
The case is going to a grand jury. Stop wining for Chrissakes.
VicePopeRandy
Mar 26, 2012, 10:50:23 AM3/26/12
to
Media consultants and other protected-from-society types, most of them
safe somewhere in 2,000 sq.ft. exurban mansions, ignore the fact that,
in less affluent zones, African American males under middle-age
customarily, and in-your-face proudly, wear dark clothes, especially
head-covering hoodies, at night, in neighborhoods white, black and in-
between.
These types need to get out more often.
D.C.'s Marion "The Taxpayer King" Barry could point the way.
Of course, we don't even want to get into illegally-tinted car and SUV
windows, do we?
Alan Ferris
Mar 26, 2012, 12:49:27 PM3/26/12
to
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:46:50 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> But it cannot get to a judge if the police do not do their job
>> correctly.
>
>The case is going to a grand jury. Stop wining for Chrissakes.
It should have been investigated properly in the first place.
wrote:
>> But it cannot get to a judge if the police do not do their job
>> correctly.
>
>The case is going to a grand jury. Stop wining for Chrissakes.
Al
Mar 26, 2012, 12:53:46 PM3/26/12
to
In article <5g71n7hs0qp79eibq...@4ax.com>,
should.
But we have obvious safeguards, including vigilante action, lynch mobs,
bounties and the like.
IOW, if justice is not done, we simply tear the guilty person to pieces in
the public square.
Our President asked us to look into our souls, and apparently, a lot of
people looked into their souls and found their inner crazy motherfucker.
Alan Ferris <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:46:50 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> But it cannot get to a judge if the police do not do their job
> >> correctly.
> >
> >The case is going to a grand jury. Stop wining for Chrissakes.
>
> It should have been investigated properly in the first place.
Police in America quite often do not perform their jobs as well as they
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:46:50 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> But it cannot get to a judge if the police do not do their job
> >> correctly.
> >
> >The case is going to a grand jury. Stop wining for Chrissakes.
>
> It should have been investigated properly in the first place.
should.
But we have obvious safeguards, including vigilante action, lynch mobs,
bounties and the like.
IOW, if justice is not done, we simply tear the guilty person to pieces in
the public square.
Our President asked us to look into our souls, and apparently, a lot of
people looked into their souls and found their inner crazy motherfucker.
David Hartung
Mar 26, 2012, 2:00:42 PM3/26/12
to
On 03/26/2012 11:49 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:46:50 -0500, Al<albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> But it cannot get to a judge if the police do not do their job
>>> correctly.
>>
>> The case is going to a grand jury. Stop wining for Chrissakes.
>
> It should have been investigated properly in the first place.
You have yet to provide any evidence that it was not.
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:46:50 -0500, Al<albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> But it cannot get to a judge if the police do not do their job
>>> correctly.
>>
>> The case is going to a grand jury. Stop wining for Chrissakes.
>
> It should have been investigated properly in the first place.
Alan Ferris
Mar 26, 2012, 2:18:52 PM3/26/12
to
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:53:46 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
wrote:
It was quite disturbing to see how people are making death threats and
offering rewards for his death. Something is very wrong in Denmark.
wrote:
offering rewards for his death. Something is very wrong in Denmark.
Alan Ferris
Mar 26, 2012, 2:20:37 PM3/26/12
to
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:00:42 -0500, David Hartung <da...@hotmaiil.com>
wrote:
Do you think the Chief Police officer and States Attorney stood aside
for no reason? They accept they have not acted correctly, shame
others cannot.
Would you investigate a crime and ignored so many witnesses, just to
take the word of the man shooting?
wrote:
for no reason? They accept they have not acted correctly, shame
others cannot.
Would you investigate a crime and ignored so many witnesses, just to
take the word of the man shooting?
Al
Mar 26, 2012, 5:33:24 PM3/26/12
to
In article <tmc1n7lje3b92o4jg...@4ax.com>,
heels of the occupy movement, this call for vigilante action and violence
will just blend in.
It might be a good time for a President to consider mentioning that people
shouldn't do that.
But that's his base, so he's probably just wishing that the ywould just wait
until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the Russians.
Alan Ferris <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:53:46 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <5g71n7hs0qp79eibq...@4ax.com>,
> > Alan Ferris <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:46:50 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> But it cannot get to a judge if the police do not do their job
> >> >> correctly.
> >> >
> >> >The case is going to a grand jury. Stop wining for Chrissakes.
> >>
> >> It should have been investigated properly in the first place.
> >
> >Police in America quite often do not perform their jobs as well as they
> >should.
> >
> >But we have obvious safeguards, including vigilante action, lynch mobs,
> >bounties and the like.
> >
> >IOW, if justice is not done, we simply tear the guilty person to pieces in
> >the public square.
> >
> >Our President asked us to look into our souls, and apparently, a lot of
> >people looked into their souls and found their inner crazy motherfucker.
>
> It was quite disturbing to see how people are making death threats and
> offering rewards for his death. Something is very wrong in Denmark.
Mob action has been encouraged in the past few years, and coming on the
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:53:46 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <5g71n7hs0qp79eibq...@4ax.com>,
> > Alan Ferris <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:46:50 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> But it cannot get to a judge if the police do not do their job
> >> >> correctly.
> >> >
> >> >The case is going to a grand jury. Stop wining for Chrissakes.
> >>
> >> It should have been investigated properly in the first place.
> >
> >Police in America quite often do not perform their jobs as well as they
> >should.
> >
> >But we have obvious safeguards, including vigilante action, lynch mobs,
> >bounties and the like.
> >
> >IOW, if justice is not done, we simply tear the guilty person to pieces in
> >the public square.
> >
> >Our President asked us to look into our souls, and apparently, a lot of
> >people looked into their souls and found their inner crazy motherfucker.
>
> It was quite disturbing to see how people are making death threats and
> offering rewards for his death. Something is very wrong in Denmark.
heels of the occupy movement, this call for vigilante action and violence
will just blend in.
It might be a good time for a President to consider mentioning that people
shouldn't do that.
But that's his base, so he's probably just wishing that the ywould just wait
until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the Russians.
Alan Ferris
Mar 26, 2012, 5:35:41 PM3/26/12
to
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
No different then to any politician awaiting election.
Message has been deleted
Al
Mar 26, 2012, 6:42:01 PM3/26/12
to
In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35n...@4ax.com>,
Yeah, everything has to be weighed:
The good of the nation or election prospects.
For the Good of the Nation, Obama announced that the occupy movement was a
good, American thing.
After two years and countless speeches identifying the enemies for them,
what could he say? It's his movement. It's his base, and he knows damn well
this base can be really, really freaky.
When as expected the movement crumbled into traditional leftist bullshit and
became costly and dangerous, Obama didn't feel as compelled to discuss the
issue.
Now, for the Good of the Nation, Obama has met the crisis early, telling
America to look into our souls, and we have mobs demanding vigilante action.
maybe he should get back on the horn and tell the mob "that's not what I
meant", but then again, that's his crazy-mob base, and they could turn on
him.
Can;t risk that, for the good of the nation, ya know.
The good of the nation or election prospects.
For the Good of the Nation, Obama announced that the occupy movement was a
good, American thing.
After two years and countless speeches identifying the enemies for them,
what could he say? It's his movement. It's his base, and he knows damn well
this base can be really, really freaky.
When as expected the movement crumbled into traditional leftist bullshit and
became costly and dangerous, Obama didn't feel as compelled to discuss the
issue.
Now, for the Good of the Nation, Obama has met the crisis early, telling
America to look into our souls, and we have mobs demanding vigilante action.
maybe he should get back on the horn and tell the mob "that's not what I
meant", but then again, that's his crazy-mob base, and they could turn on
him.
Can;t risk that, for the good of the nation, ya know.
Al
Mar 26, 2012, 6:44:15 PM3/26/12
to
In article <dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35n...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
> important treaties with the Russians.
Can you think of anything that changed in the years leqding up to that?
denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35n...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
> <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
>
> >>On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>But that's his base, so he's probably just wishing that the ywould just
> >>wait
> >>until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the
> >>Russians.
> >
> >No different then to any politician awaiting election.
>
> Notably the way Ronald Reagan waited until his second term to sign
> >>wait
> >>until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the
> >>Russians.
> >
> >No different then to any politician awaiting election.
>
> important treaties with the Russians.
Can you think of anything that changed in the years leqding up to that?
Juan Hungloe
Mar 26, 2012, 6:57:45 PM3/26/12
to
On Mar 26, 5:19 pm, denni...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35nkkb7dg1advq8tt...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
>
> <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
hate Obama for doing the same thing.
> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35nkkb7dg1advq8tt...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
>
> <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>But that's his base, so he's probably just wishing that the ywould just wait
> >>until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the Russians.
>
> >No different then to any politician awaiting election.
>
> >>until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the Russians.
>
> >No different then to any politician awaiting election.
>
> Notably the way Ronald Reagan waited until his second term to sign
> important treaties with the Russians.
I see. So,since you hate Reagan it seems only reasonable that you'd
> important treaties with the Russians.
hate Obama for doing the same thing.
Message has been deleted
duke
Mar 27, 2012, 7:51:37 AM3/27/12
to
into society. Don't get me wrong. Quite a few have. But the "who's you
daddy" problem, drugs, life in the 'hoodie' and being an "at-lete" is ruining
them. Society is reaching it's limits of tolerance on them.
duke
Mar 27, 2012, 7:52:57 AM3/27/12
to
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:44:44 -0500, denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>In article <albert.finney000-0B...@news.giganews.com>, Al
>What does that have to do with your side assigning something nefarious to
>Obama's statement about more flexibility in his second term.
It's called "scared to death" of what our fool of a pres will do unrestricted.
>In article <albert.finney000-0B...@news.giganews.com>, Al
>Obama's statement about more flexibility in his second term.
It's called "scared to death" of what our fool of a pres will do unrestricted.
Paul Duca
Mar 27, 2012, 3:07:48 PM3/27/12
to
On Mar 27, 7:51 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:03:40 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <i9m0n7p9tc6qbuh6bt8rt3foktsmbd5...@4ax.com>,
> > duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:41:17 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <s7tum79r4rbjpjpkotfptirik51lgiv...@4ax.com>,
> >> > Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >> >> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:21:24 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com>
wasted THEIR lives "being an at-lete"?
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:03:40 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <i9m0n7p9tc6qbuh6bt8rt3foktsmbd5...@4ax.com>,
> > duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:41:17 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <s7tum79r4rbjpjpkotfptirik51lgiv...@4ax.com>,
> >> > Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >> >> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:21:24 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
> >> >> >> (all legal, of course)
>
> >> >> >Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
>
> >> >> Not a question of payback
>
> >> >> It's a question of you inferring that blacks have no reason to claim
> >> >> unfair
>
> >> >Yes, black people have had to deal with some very unfair circumstances.
>
> >> And now they want "repirations".
> >Some of them do, the Marxist blacks who want others to bear the burden of
> >their own failures.
> >To them, their blackness is a crutch and a meal ticket.
> >This is the legacy of liberalism's devastating effect on the black community.
>
> Yes, they've had 50 years now to strive forward and get an education and move
> into society. Don't get me wrong. Quite a few have. But the "who's you
> daddy" problem, drugs, life in the 'hoodie' and being an "at-lete" is ruining
> them. Society is reaching it's limits of tolerance on them. And we need more cheap servants, anyway.
>
> >> >> >> Compared to the hundreds lynched by whites? Starved, beaten, robbed,
> >> >> >> (all legal, of course)
>
> >> >> >Sooner or late, someone had to invoke the "Payback Rule".
>
> >> >> Not a question of payback
>
> >> >> It's a question of you inferring that blacks have no reason to claim
> >> >> unfair
>
> >> >Yes, black people have had to deal with some very unfair circumstances.
>
> >> And now they want "repirations".
> >Some of them do, the Marxist blacks who want others to bear the burden of
> >their own failures.
> >To them, their blackness is a crutch and a meal ticket.
> >This is the legacy of liberalism's devastating effect on the black community.
>
> Yes, they've had 50 years now to strive forward and get an education and move
> into society. Don't get me wrong. Quite a few have. But the "who's you
> daddy" problem, drugs, life in the 'hoodie' and being an "at-lete" is ruining
>
> duke, American - American
>
> *****
> 1 John 3:4-6
> 4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
> sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
> appeared so that he might take away our sins.
> And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
> him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
> sin has either seen him or known him.
> *****
Funny...why doesn't Duke feel the white QB for the Saints or LSU
> duke, American - American
>
> *****
> 1 John 3:4-6
> 4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
> sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
> appeared so that he might take away our sins.
> And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
> him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
> sin has either seen him or known him.
> *****
wasted THEIR lives "being an at-lete"?
Paul Duca
Mar 27, 2012, 3:08:59 PM3/27/12
to
On Mar 26, 6:42 pm, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35nkkb7dg1advq8tt...@4ax.com>,
> Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35nkkb7dg1advq8tt...@4ax.com>,
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >In article <tmc1n7lje3b92o4jgl47ssfotvubhq2...@4ax.com>,
> > > Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > >> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:53:46 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> >In article <5g71n7hs0qp79eibqati688gp6em7p1...@4ax.com>,
> > >> > Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > >> >> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:46:50 -0500, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com>
you, other than provide scapegoats for your problems?
Paul
Al
Mar 27, 2012, 7:06:49 PM3/27/12
to
> What does that have to do with your side assigning something nefarious to
> Obama's statement about more flexibility in his second term.
You are he one who inserted Reagan into the discussion.
> Obama's statement about more flexibility in his second term.
I'm assigning nefarious intent because I know that Obama's aim is to get rid
of missile defense in Europe, but he knows it may be politically unpopular.
So, he doesn't want the Russians to bring it up.
What do you think the Russians will want in exchange?
Al
Mar 27, 2012, 7:49:41 PM3/27/12
to
In article <u3a3n79mer167eqbf...@4ax.com>,
Hey hey LBJ, how many black families did you destroy today.
Message has been deleted
Al
Mar 27, 2012, 11:10:37 PM3/27/12
to
> In article <albert.finney000-9B...@news.giganews.com>, Al
> No less politically unpopular than if Reagan had signed major Russian
> treaties in his first term instead of his second.
OK, we're back to Reagan then.
What did/do you find objectionable? The fact that these treaties were signed
in Reagan's second term, or what was in the treaties?
> But then it doesn't
> matter whenever he went against conservative dogma (like raising taxes
> also) because he's "St. Ronnie Reagan, Conservative Superman."
He was and is respected by a very large swath of the folks, that's for sure,
some like him more than others.
> Since everybody knows Reagan, Nixon, Clinton, Bush Jr. and any other
> president lucky enough to have a second term were "more flexible" than in
> their respective first terms your talking point about Obama just doesn't
> have any traction.
They are "more flexible" when they face an opposing congress, which is how I
like it, even though I think the Democrats are they Party of 2027, which is
when the CBO says we run out of money at our present rate of spending.
But that is seen as a a rather radical position in DC these days.
> treaties in his first term instead of his second.
OK, we're back to Reagan then.
What did/do you find objectionable? The fact that these treaties were signed
in Reagan's second term, or what was in the treaties?
> But then it doesn't
> matter whenever he went against conservative dogma (like raising taxes
> also) because he's "St. Ronnie Reagan, Conservative Superman."
He was and is respected by a very large swath of the folks, that's for sure,
some like him more than others.
> Since everybody knows Reagan, Nixon, Clinton, Bush Jr. and any other
> president lucky enough to have a second term were "more flexible" than in
> their respective first terms your talking point about Obama just doesn't
> have any traction.
They are "more flexible" when they face an opposing congress, which is how I
like it, even though I think the Democrats are they Party of 2027, which is
when the CBO says we run out of money at our present rate of spending.
But that is seen as a a rather radical position in DC these days.
duke
Mar 28, 2012, 7:27:41 AM3/28/12
to
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:06:49 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>In article <dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
> denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>
>> In article <albert.finney000-0B...@news.giganews.com>, Al
>> <albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
>> > denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35n...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
>> >> <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >>But that's his base, so he's probably just wishing that the ywould just
>> >> >>wait
>> >> >>until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the
>> >> >>Russians.
>> >> >
>> >> >No different then to any politician awaiting election.
>> >>
>> >> Notably the way Ronald Reagan waited until his second term to sign
>> >> important treaties with the Russians.
>> >
>> >Can you think of anything that changed in the years leqding up to that?
>>
>> What does that have to do with your side assigning something nefarious to
>> Obama's statement about more flexibility in his second term.
>
>You are he one who inserted Reagan into the discussion.
>
>I'm assigning nefarious intent because I know that Obama's aim is to get rid
>of missile defense in Europe, but he knows it may be politically unpopular.
And what right does buckwheat have to change chosen Americian lifestyle so
>In article <dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
> denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>
>> In article <albert.finney000-0B...@news.giganews.com>, Al
>> <albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
>> > denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35n...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
>> >> <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >>But that's his base, so he's probably just wishing that the ywould just
>> >> >>wait
>> >> >>until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the
>> >> >>Russians.
>> >> >
>> >> >No different then to any politician awaiting election.
>> >>
>> >> Notably the way Ronald Reagan waited until his second term to sign
>> >> important treaties with the Russians.
>> >
>> >Can you think of anything that changed in the years leqding up to that?
>>
>> What does that have to do with your side assigning something nefarious to
>> Obama's statement about more flexibility in his second term.
>
>You are he one who inserted Reagan into the discussion.
>
>I'm assigning nefarious intent because I know that Obama's aim is to get rid
>of missile defense in Europe, but he knows it may be politically unpopular.
drastically. Is he God? He thinks he is. He's personally trying to change us
from sovereign to subject to world court.
>So, he doesn't want the Russians to bring it up.
>
>What do you think the Russians will want in exchange?
duke
Mar 28, 2012, 7:29:01 AM3/28/12
to
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:30:11 -0500, denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>In article <albert.finney000-9B...@news.giganews.com>, Al
the disgust of the majority.
>Since everybody knows Reagan, Nixon, Clinton, Bush Jr. and any other
>president lucky enough to have a second term were "more flexible" than in
>their respective first terms your talking point about Obama just doesn't
>have any traction.
>In article <albert.finney000-9B...@news.giganews.com>, Al
><albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
>> denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>>
>>> In article <albert.finney000-0B...@news.giganews.com>, Al
>>> <albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
>>> > denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35n...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
>>> >> <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >>On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>wrote:
>>> >> >>But that's his base, so he's probably just wishing that the ywould just
>>> >> >>wait
>>> >> >>until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the
>>> >> >>Russians.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >No different then to any politician awaiting election.
>>> >>
>>> >> Notably the way Ronald Reagan waited until his second term to sign
>>> >> important treaties with the Russians.
>>> >
>>> >Can you think of anything that changed in the years leqding up to that?
>>>
>>> What does that have to do with your side assigning something nefarious to
>>> Obama's statement about more flexibility in his second term.
>>
>>You are he one who inserted Reagan into the discussion.
>>
>>I'm assigning nefarious intent because I know that Obama's aim is to get rid
>>of missile defense in Europe, but he knows it may be politically unpopular.
>
>
>>In article <dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
>> denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>>
>>> In article <albert.finney000-0B...@news.giganews.com>, Al
>>> <albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
>>> > denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> In article <o8o1n799cak1cv35n...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
>>> >> <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >>On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:24 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>wrote:
>>> >> >>But that's his base, so he's probably just wishing that the ywould just
>>> >> >>wait
>>> >> >>until after the election to cause him problems - like he asked the
>>> >> >>Russians.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >No different then to any politician awaiting election.
>>> >>
>>> >> Notably the way Ronald Reagan waited until his second term to sign
>>> >> important treaties with the Russians.
>>> >
>>> >Can you think of anything that changed in the years leqding up to that?
>>>
>>> What does that have to do with your side assigning something nefarious to
>>> Obama's statement about more flexibility in his second term.
>>
>>You are he one who inserted Reagan into the discussion.
>>
>>I'm assigning nefarious intent because I know that Obama's aim is to get rid
>>of missile defense in Europe, but he knows it may be politically unpopular.
>
>No less politically unpopular than if Reagan had signed major Russian
>treaties in his first term instead of his second. But then it doesn't
>matter whenever he went against conservative dogma (like raising taxes
>also) because he's "St. Ronnie Reagan, Conservative Superman."
But ALL of the US was behind him. Buckwheat only has a minority behind him to
>also) because he's "St. Ronnie Reagan, Conservative Superman."
the disgust of the majority.
>Since everybody knows Reagan, Nixon, Clinton, Bush Jr. and any other
>president lucky enough to have a second term were "more flexible" than in
>their respective first terms your talking point about Obama just doesn't
>have any traction.
duke
Mar 28, 2012, 7:29:55 AM3/28/12
to
George Kerby
Mar 28, 2012, 1:34:56 PM3/28/12
to
On 3/27/12 6:06 PM, in article
albert.finney000-9B...@news.giganews.com, "Al"
<http://tinypic.com/r/eq1c11/5>
Message has been deleted
lsrlts
Mar 28, 2012, 2:25:21 PM3/28/12
to
On 3/28/2012 11:18 AM, Dennis M wrote:
> In article<albert.finney000-80...@news.giganews.com>, Al
> non-Republicans, nobody's voted for Reagan in 28 years so the term "Reagan
> Democrat" is pure horseshit.
>
> He had the advantage of everybody being sick of Jimmy Carter back then. I'm
> a Democrat and even I didn't like Carter (at the time, at least).
>
> Still, Carter would have mopped the floor with Reagan if it hadn't been for
> those hostages.
Carter was a lightweight at debate, devoid of charisma, and physically
unappealing.
Think about it.
> In article<albert.finney000-80...@news.giganews.com>, Al
> <albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> In article<dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
>>> denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>>> But then it doesn't matter whenever he went against conservative
>>> dogma (like raising taxes also) because he's "St. Ronnie Reagan,
>>> Conservative Superman."
>>
>> He was and is respected by a very large swath of the folks, that's for sure,
>> some like him more than others.
>
> Republicans to this day exaggerate his lasting popularity with
>
>>> In article<dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de>,
>>> denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote:
>>> But then it doesn't matter whenever he went against conservative
>>> dogma (like raising taxes also) because he's "St. Ronnie Reagan,
>>> Conservative Superman."
>>
>> He was and is respected by a very large swath of the folks, that's for sure,
>> some like him more than others.
>
> non-Republicans, nobody's voted for Reagan in 28 years so the term "Reagan
> Democrat" is pure horseshit.
>
> He had the advantage of everybody being sick of Jimmy Carter back then. I'm
> a Democrat and even I didn't like Carter (at the time, at least).
>
> Still, Carter would have mopped the floor with Reagan if it hadn't been for
> those hostages.
Carter was a lightweight at debate, devoid of charisma, and physically
unappealing.
Think about it.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Al
Mar 28, 2012, 8:03:45 PM3/28/12
to
In article <cat5n7h8gg2u0jd6k...@4ax.com>,
Not much different than your average democrat actually. A lot of them would
prefer UN rule over Republican rule if it were an option, or a benevolent
president-for-life.
It's just the way they roll.
prefer UN rule over Republican rule if it were an option, or a benevolent
president-for-life.
It's just the way they roll.
Al
Mar 28, 2012, 8:11:36 PM3/28/12
to
In article <1et5n7dhj708sa4dr...@4ax.com>,
> the disgust of the majority.'
Reagan was The Great Communicator, Obama is a Teleprompter.
Take a look at the tapes of Reagan and Gorby in Iceland, you don't have to
hear what's being said to interpret the body language, reagan was dressing
the Ruskie down big time. Walked out, said "fuck you", for the good of
America.
The whole time the Soviets were freaking out over SDI, the American left was
assuring us that the idea was just plain crazy, it could never possibly work
and Reagan was a foolish idiot.
What little tools these leftists are, thank God there are so few of them.
Reagan was The Great Communicator, Obama is a Teleprompter.
Take a look at the tapes of Reagan and Gorby in Iceland, you don't have to
hear what's being said to interpret the body language, reagan was dressing
the Ruskie down big time. Walked out, said "fuck you", for the good of
America.
The whole time the Soviets were freaking out over SDI, the American left was
assuring us that the idea was just plain crazy, it could never possibly work
and Reagan was a foolish idiot.
What little tools these leftists are, thank God there are so few of them.
Al
Mar 28, 2012, 8:14:48 PM3/28/12
to
In article <mgt5n7d3knontiimi...@4ax.com>,
Prior to the saving grace of the Great Society, the black family structure
was one of the strongest in the US, out of obvious neccessity.
The patronizing, condescending liberals then adopted them, and by efficient
management (those Negroes need us!!), they spent trillions and fucked things
up.
There's nothing a leftist can't fuck up.
was one of the strongest in the US, out of obvious neccessity.
The patronizing, condescending liberals then adopted them, and by efficient
management (those Negroes need us!!), they spent trillions and fucked things
up.
There's nothing a leftist can't fuck up.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages