Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
No New Gun Restrictions! I Will Not Support Any Republican That Supports New Anti Gun Policies!
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Tracey12
Jan 27, 2013, 3:50:56 AM1/27/13
to
Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
regulations.
We will expose them to the voting public.
Democrats should be exposed as well.
supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
regulations.
We will expose them to the voting public.
Democrats should be exposed as well.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Lee Curtiss
Jan 27, 2013, 10:45:43 AM1/27/13
to
Tracey12 wrote:
> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> regulations.
>
> We will expose them to the voting public.
Good.
> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> regulations.
>
> We will expose them to the voting public.
With the voting public hugely in favor of
new gun laws that should make defeating said
Republicans in the next election even easier.
Kenny McCormack
Jan 27, 2013, 11:08:33 AM1/27/13
to
In article <t-edncb3lbw61pjM...@giganews.com>,
Actually, it will *help* them - they are the ones on the right side of the
issue (didn't you read the original post?).
It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the party - the ones still
fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone armed. And they *are* the ones
who deserve to get shafted by the voting public.
--
They say compassion is a virtue, but I don't have the time!
- David Byrne -
issue (didn't you read the original post?).
It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the party - the ones still
fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone armed. And they *are* the ones
who deserve to get shafted by the voting public.
--
They say compassion is a virtue, but I don't have the time!
- David Byrne -
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 11:11:32 AM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 7:56 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> > supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> > regulations.
>
> > We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> That ought to put the final nail into the coffin of the Republican Party.
> > Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> > supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> > regulations.
>
> > We will expose them to the voting public.
>
Sure. You fucking beady eyed moonbats have been saying last rites over
the Republican party for decades. How's that hopey/changey thing
working for you?
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 11:13:08 AM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 8:54 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:50:56 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
>
> That way MORE rational people will vote for them
>
> After all---the Republican brand is at 23% approval rating.
More and more law enforcement individuals say they won't enforce Dear
Leader's gungrabber laws. 133 and counting. Google it.
Via The Blaze:
Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. has a message for residents:
learn how to use a gun.
With budget cutbacks putting a strain on law enforcement, simply
calling 911 might not cut it in a life-or-death or situation, Clarke
said in a new radio ad this month. Safety is “no longer a spectator
sport,” he says. “I need you in the game.”
“With officers laid off and furloughed, simply calling 911 and waiting
is no longer your best option,” Clark adds. “You can beg for mercy
from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back.
But are you prepared?”
“Consider taking a certified safety course in handling a firearm so
you can defend yourself until we get there. You have a duty to protect
yourself and your family. We’re partners now. Can I count on you?” he
asks.
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:50:56 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
>
> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >regulations.
>
> Okay
> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >regulations.
>
>
> That way MORE rational people will vote for them
>
> After all---the Republican brand is at 23% approval rating.
More and more law enforcement individuals say they won't enforce Dear
Leader's gungrabber laws. 133 and counting. Google it.
Via The Blaze:
Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. has a message for residents:
learn how to use a gun.
With budget cutbacks putting a strain on law enforcement, simply
calling 911 might not cut it in a life-or-death or situation, Clarke
said in a new radio ad this month. Safety is “no longer a spectator
sport,” he says. “I need you in the game.”
“With officers laid off and furloughed, simply calling 911 and waiting
is no longer your best option,” Clark adds. “You can beg for mercy
from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back.
But are you prepared?”
“Consider taking a certified safety course in handling a firearm so
you can defend yourself until we get there. You have a duty to protect
yourself and your family. We’re partners now. Can I count on you?” he
asks.
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 11:13:31 AM1/27/13
to
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 11:15:53 AM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:08 am, gaze...@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
wrote:
> In article <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
A word of advice. Before you try to "shaft" anyone you better make
sure they're not armed. Don't bring a latte' and a quiche to a
gunfight.
wrote:
> In article <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
sure they're not armed. Don't bring a latte' and a quiche to a
gunfight.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Tracey12
Jan 27, 2013, 11:55:48 AM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 7:56 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> > supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> > regulations.
>
> > We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> > supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> > regulations.
>
> > We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> That ought to put the final nail into the coffin of the Republican Party.
Heavy handed government will send the democrat party back to the days
of Mr. Peanut, Jimmy Carter.
Just remember this very important point: The NRA is more popular than
Obama.
Kenny McCormack
Jan 27, 2013, 11:57:53 AM1/27/13
to
In article <eoradixu6c7i.1i...@40tude.net>,
Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
...
>Yeah, I think he got it backwards.
>
>But the point is that the Republicans are cannibalizing their own, as
>befits the 'stupid' party.
>
>Perhaps Jindal should have said 'the party of the stupid'?
Indeed. And we're going to be seeing a lot more of that - as people start
realizing what a bunch of loons they've tied their futures to.
--
Just for a change of pace, this sig is *not* an obscure reference to
comp.lang.c...
Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
...
>Yeah, I think he got it backwards.
>
>But the point is that the Republicans are cannibalizing their own, as
>befits the 'stupid' party.
>
>Perhaps Jindal should have said 'the party of the stupid'?
Indeed. And we're going to be seeing a lot more of that - as people start
realizing what a bunch of loons they've tied their futures to.
--
Just for a change of pace, this sig is *not* an obscure reference to
comp.lang.c...
Tracey12
Jan 27, 2013, 11:59:08 AM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:11 am, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey
These democrat morons dont understand that anti gun R.I.N.O.s are
really democrats hiding under our tent. We are going to sort the herd
and get back to being the party that believes in liberty vs. the fools
on the left taking our country down the road to a socialist communist
european death trap.
really democrats hiding under our tent. We are going to sort the herd
and get back to being the party that believes in liberty vs. the fools
on the left taking our country down the road to a socialist communist
european death trap.
Tracey12
Jan 27, 2013, 12:01:38 PM1/27/13
to
>
> John McCain is not President of the USA.
>
> Neither is Mitt Romney.
>
> Instead, a black man by the name of Barak Hussein Obama is President.
>
> Don't ask for a cite; if you don't believe me, look it up for yourself.
I don't have to look up this well known fact: The NRA is more popular
than Obama.
Tracey12
Jan 27, 2013, 12:05:24 PM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:27 am, vith...@gmail.com wrote:
> How did that work in the last election? ROTFLMAO
Your lying president didn't start his anti gun campaign until AFTER
the election because he knew it would cost him the very slim margin
that he won by. A mere 3.4 million votes isn't jack, so watch your
mouth there, son. If Muslim, Kenyan Obama had even mentioned going
against the Second Amendment before the election, you'd still be at
the bar crying in your Billy Beer.
Your lying president didn't start his anti gun campaign until AFTER
the election because he knew it would cost him the very slim margin
that he won by. A mere 3.4 million votes isn't jack, so watch your
mouth there, son. If Muslim, Kenyan Obama had even mentioned going
against the Second Amendment before the election, you'd still be at
the bar crying in your Billy Beer.
Tracey12
Jan 27, 2013, 12:09:13 PM1/27/13
to
> quote above doesn't say that he won't enforce gun laws.
>
> But even if you were correct, 133 out of 809,000 sworn police officers is
> quite insignificant.
>
> And, of course, any sworn officer who refuses to obey his oath will be
> summarily fired.
>
> Don't worry about it; the gun laws will be enforced.
Its unlikely that you've heard of Oathkeepers.org, yet if you happen
to check out that site, you will see that since Katrina, many law
enforcement / military types have taken a pledge to NEVER OBEY any
commands that go against the US Constitution and most importantly,
they promise to never disarm the American public. We had you cut off
at the pass before you even realized it, boy.
BIG BIRD
Jan 27, 2013, 12:09:33 PM1/27/13
to
"Tracey12" <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2c65581c-0d4b-43e6...@xm8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
||__|| | Do not feed the |
/ \ | HILLBILLY LOOOSERS!!!!. |
/ O O\ | Thank you. |
/ \ | Big Bird Executive Mgr. |
/ \ \|_________________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
Tracey12
Jan 27, 2013, 12:10:20 PM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:43 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > In article <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
> > In article <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
> > Lee Curtiss <clee...@verizon.com> wrote:
> >>Tracey12 wrote:
>
> >>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> regulations.
>
> >>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> >> Good.
>
> >> With the voting public hugely in favor of
> >>new gun laws that should make defeating said
> >>Republicans in the next election even easier.
>
> > Actually, it will *help* them - they are the ones on the right side of the
> > issue (didn't you read the original post?).
>
> > It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the party - the ones still
> > fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone armed. And they *are* the ones
> > who deserve to get shafted by the voting public.
>
> >>Tracey12 wrote:
>
> >>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> regulations.
>
> >>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> >> Good.
>
> >> With the voting public hugely in favor of
> >>new gun laws that should make defeating said
> >>Republicans in the next election even easier.
>
> > Actually, it will *help* them - they are the ones on the right side of the
> > issue (didn't you read the original post?).
>
> > It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the party - the ones still
> > fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone armed. And they *are* the ones
> > who deserve to get shafted by the voting public.
>
> Yeah, I think he got it backwards.
>
> But the point is that the Republicans are cannibalizing their own, as
> befits the 'stupid' party.
>
> Perhaps Jindal should have said 'the party of the stupid'?
Stupid Party? HA HA! Your lying president won't even make his
>
> But the point is that the Republicans are cannibalizing their own, as
> befits the 'stupid' party.
>
> Perhaps Jindal should have said 'the party of the stupid'?
college records available. What is this Kenyan hiding?
BIG BIRD
Jan 27, 2013, 12:10:20 PM1/27/13
to
news:e8634f97-4116-4031...@v5g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
/| /| | Please |
||__|| | Do not feed the |
/ \ | Gomer LOOOSERS!!!!. |
||__|| | Do not feed the |
Tracey12
Jan 27, 2013, 12:11:41 PM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:47 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> David Koresh and Randy Weaver can tell you that the cops don't show up
> unarmed.
"The cops" had nothing to do with either case. When did you finally
wake up?
> David Koresh and Randy Weaver can tell you that the cops don't show up
> unarmed.
"The cops" had nothing to do with either case. When did you finally
wake up?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Alan Ferris
Jan 27, 2013, 12:30:05 PM1/27/13
to
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:01:38 -0800 (PST), Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, the NRA enjoys 41% positive approval rating
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/01/17/wsjnbc-poll-shows-continuing-support-for-nra/
Obama�s approval rating nationwide is better than it is in the swing states,
with 52 percent saying they approve
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/279337-poll-obamas-approval-rating-dips-in-swing-states#ixzz2JCLDJNeh
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Atheist #1211
EAC(UK)#252 Ironic Torture Div.
SERV:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWhXGhv-tTo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7bsUttGho8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60mZsohBr3Q
wrote:
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/01/17/wsjnbc-poll-shows-continuing-support-for-nra/
Obama�s approval rating nationwide is better than it is in the swing states,
with 52 percent saying they approve
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/279337-poll-obamas-approval-rating-dips-in-swing-states#ixzz2JCLDJNeh
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Atheist #1211
EAC(UK)#252 Ironic Torture Div.
SERV:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWhXGhv-tTo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7bsUttGho8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60mZsohBr3Q
Alan Ferris
Jan 27, 2013, 12:31:54 PM1/27/13
to
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:55:48 -0800 (PST), Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Obama at 52% is somehow less than the NRA's 41%
wrote:
Alan Ferris
Jan 27, 2013, 12:33:07 PM1/27/13
to
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:05:24 -0800 (PST), Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com>
wrote:
It that why still more than half your nation approve what he is doing?
wrote:
Alan Ferris
Jan 27, 2013, 12:34:40 PM1/27/13
to
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:10:20 -0800 (PST), Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com>
wrote:
He is just having fun watching you all run around screaming about it.
wrote:
Kenny McCormack
Jan 27, 2013, 12:48:30 PM1/27/13
to
In article <3297i8zq8q6f.17rsaifzxl4td$.d...@40tude.net>,
>
>So far, at least, I'd say that any politician who got your endorsement had
>better reconsider his cmpaign strategy. ;-)
Or look for another line of work...
(I.e., don't quit your day job!)
--
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public
expense.
Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
...
>But...but...but... you told us that Mitt Romney was going to win ANYWAY.
...
>
>So far, at least, I'd say that any politician who got your endorsement had
>better reconsider his cmpaign strategy. ;-)
Or look for another line of work...
(I.e., don't quit your day job!)
--
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public
expense.
Kenny McCormack
Jan 27, 2013, 12:50:43 PM1/27/13
to
In article <k2pag890nhr81bvta...@4ax.com>,
Alan Ferris <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
...
and things.
A Repub could read in the paper the figures you quote above (literally!) and
walk away thinking (using the term loosely, of course) that the NRA was more
popular than Obama. They are that pre-conditioned.
--
People who say they'll vote for someone else because Obama couldn't solve
all of Bush's messes are like people complaining that he couldn't cure cancer,
so they'll go and vote for cancer.
Alan Ferris <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
...
>Obama at 52% is somehow less than the NRA's 41%
It is Republican math. They're just not very good with numbers and facts
and things.
A Repub could read in the paper the figures you quote above (literally!) and
walk away thinking (using the term loosely, of course) that the NRA was more
popular than Obama. They are that pre-conditioned.
--
People who say they'll vote for someone else because Obama couldn't solve
all of Bush's messes are like people complaining that he couldn't cure cancer,
so they'll go and vote for cancer.
Message has been deleted
George Kerby
Jan 27, 2013, 12:58:52 PM1/27/13
to
On 1/27/13 10:25 AM, in article m3h2kqzi91pt.py2osldvpvgb$.d...@40tude.net,
"Morgoth Bauglir" <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 27, 7:56 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>>>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
>>>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
>>>> regulations.
>>>
>>>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>>>
>>> That ought to put the final nail into the coffin of the Republican Party.
>>
>>
>> Sure. You fucking beady eyed moonbats have been saying last rites over
>> the Republican party for decades. How's that hopey/changey thing
>> working for you?
>
> Pretty well.
>
Yeah. You are getting mo and mo Food Stamps there at the expense of the
>> the Republican party for decades. How's that hopey/changey thing
>> working for you?
>
> Pretty well.
>
working class in the form of O-BOO-MAH's repeal of the Bush Payroll Tax
Reduction...
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
bill clinton
Jan 27, 2013, 3:55:29 PM1/27/13
to
Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 27, 10:08 am, gaze...@shell.xmission.com (Kenny
>> McCormack)
>>> They say compassion is a virtue, but I don't have the
>>> time!
>>>
>>> - David Byrne -
>>
>> A word of advice. Before you try to "shaft" anyone you
>> better make
>> sure they're not armed. Don't bring a latte' and a quiche
>> to a
>> gunfight.
>> On Jan 27, 10:08 am, gaze...@shell.xmission.com (Kenny
>> McCormack)
>> wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
>>>
>>> Lee Curtiss <clee...@verizon.com> wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
>>>
>>> Lee Curtiss <clee...@verizon.com> wrote:
>>>> Tracey12 wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any
>>>>> new Obama
>>>>> supported anti gun policies which includes new
>>>>> legislation, or
>>>>> regulations.
>>>
>>>>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any
>>>>> new Obama
>>>>> supported anti gun policies which includes new
>>>>> legislation, or
>>>>> regulations.
>>>
>>>>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>>>
>>>> Good.
>>>
>>>> With the voting public hugely in favor of
>>>> new gun laws that should make defeating said
>>>> Republicans in the next election even easier.
>>>
>>> Actually, it will *help* them - they are the ones on the
>>> right side
>>> of the issue (didn't you read the original post?).
>>>
>>> It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the
>>> party - the
>>> ones still fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone
>>> armed. And
>>> they *are* the ones who deserve to get shafted by the
>>> voting public.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>> With the voting public hugely in favor of
>>>> new gun laws that should make defeating said
>>>> Republicans in the next election even easier.
>>>
>>> Actually, it will *help* them - they are the ones on the
>>> right side
>>> of the issue (didn't you read the original post?).
>>>
>>> It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the
>>> party - the
>>> ones still fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone
>>> armed. And
>>> they *are* the ones who deserve to get shafted by the
>>> voting public.
>>>
>>> They say compassion is a virtue, but I don't have the
>>> time!
>>>
>>> - David Byrne -
>>
>> A word of advice. Before you try to "shaft" anyone you
>> better make
>> sure they're not armed. Don't bring a latte' and a quiche
>> to a
>> gunfight.
>
> David Koresh and Randy Weaver can tell you that the cops
> don't show up
> unarmed.
apples and oranges...try again
> David Koresh and Randy Weaver can tell you that the cops
> don't show up
> unarmed.
Message has been deleted
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 5:05:59 PM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:25 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
NOT black. Google it you don't believe me. Looks like you got
snookered since the ONLY reason you support Obama is for the color of
his skin. Btw, can you tell us what you think the end game is for
Obama?
> > On Jan 27, 7:56 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> >>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> regulations.
>
> >>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> >>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> regulations.
>
> >>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> >> That ought to put the final nail into the coffin of the Republican Party.
>
> > Sure. You fucking beady eyed moonbats have been saying last rites over
> > the Republican party for decades. How's that hopey/changey thing
> > working for you?
>
> Pretty well.
>
>
> > Sure. You fucking beady eyed moonbats have been saying last rites over
> > the Republican party for decades. How's that hopey/changey thing
> > working for you?
>
> Pretty well.
>
> John McCain is not President of the USA.
>
> Neither is Mitt Romney.
>
> Instead, a black man by the name of Barak Hussein Obama is President.
>
> Don't ask for a cite; if you don't believe me, look it up for yourself.
I hate to be the harbinger of bad news, but Barack Hussein Obama is
>
> Neither is Mitt Romney.
>
> Instead, a black man by the name of Barak Hussein Obama is President.
>
> Don't ask for a cite; if you don't believe me, look it up for yourself.
NOT black. Google it you don't believe me. Looks like you got
snookered since the ONLY reason you support Obama is for the color of
his skin. Btw, can you tell us what you think the end game is for
Obama?
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 5:08:58 PM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:37 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 8:54 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:50:56 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
>
> > On Jan 27, 8:54 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:50:56 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
>
> >> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>>supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>>regulations.
>
> >>>Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>>supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>>regulations.
>
> >> Okay
>
> >> That way MORE rational people will vote for them
>
> >> After all---the Republican brand is at 23% approval rating.
>
> > More and more law enforcement individuals say they won't enforce Dear
> > Leader's gungrabber laws. 133 and counting. Google it.
>
> > Via The Blaze:
>
> > Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. has a message for residents:
> > learn how to use a gun.
>
> > With budget cutbacks putting a strain on law enforcement, simply
> > calling 911 might not cut it in a life-or-death or situation, Clarke
> > said in a new radio ad this month. Safety is ´no longer a spectator
> > sport,¡ he says. ´I need you in the game.¡
>
> > ´With officers laid off and furloughed, simply calling 911 and waiting
> > is no longer your best option,¡ Clark adds. ´You can beg for mercy
> > from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back.
> > But are you prepared?¡
>
> > ´Consider taking a certified safety course in handling a firearm so
> > you can defend yourself until we get there. You have a duty to protect
> > yourself and your family. Weÿre partners now. Can I count on you?¡ he
>
> >> That way MORE rational people will vote for them
>
> >> After all---the Republican brand is at 23% approval rating.
>
> > More and more law enforcement individuals say they won't enforce Dear
> > Leader's gungrabber laws. 133 and counting. Google it.
>
> > Via The Blaze:
>
> > Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. has a message for residents:
> > learn how to use a gun.
>
> > With budget cutbacks putting a strain on law enforcement, simply
> > calling 911 might not cut it in a life-or-death or situation, Clarke
> > said in a new radio ad this month. Safety is ´no longer a spectator
> > sport,¡ he says. ´I need you in the game.¡
>
> > ´With officers laid off and furloughed, simply calling 911 and waiting
> > is no longer your best option,¡ Clark adds. ´You can beg for mercy
> > from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back.
> > But are you prepared?¡
>
> > ´Consider taking a certified safety course in handling a firearm so
> > you can defend yourself until we get there. You have a duty to protect
> > asks.
>
> I don't believe your numbers; certainly the Milwaukee Country Sheriff you
> quote above doesn't say that he won't enforce gun laws.
>
> But even if you were correct, 133 out of 809,000 sworn police officers is
> quite insignificant.
>
> And, of course, any sworn officer who refuses to obey his oath will be
> summarily fired.
>
> Don't worry about it; the gun laws will be enforced.- Hide quoted text -
>
> I don't believe your numbers; certainly the Milwaukee Country Sheriff you
> quote above doesn't say that he won't enforce gun laws.
>
> But even if you were correct, 133 out of 809,000 sworn police officers is
> quite insignificant.
>
> And, of course, any sworn officer who refuses to obey his oath will be
> summarily fired.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ohh. Looks like Feinstein's gungrab laws won't even make it through
the Senate. Shall we be looking for another Executive Order from
Generalissimo Obama to bypass Congress and the will of the people, yet
again?
http://thehill.com/video/sunday-shows/279503-feinstein-passing-gun-control-hardest-of-the-hard
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 5:09:44 PM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:37 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 9:45 am, "Lee Curtiss" <clee...@verizon.com> wrote:
> >> Tracey12 wrote:
> >>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> regulations.
>
> >>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> regulations.
>
> >>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
>
> >> Good.
>
> >> With the voting public hugely in favor of
> >> new gun laws that should make defeating said
> >> Republicans in the next election even easier.
>
> > I suppose you can provide a cite for that claim.
>
> >> With the voting public hugely in favor of
> >> new gun laws that should make defeating said
> >> Republicans in the next election even easier.
>
>
> Yes.
Ok. I'm still
waiting....................................................tick-
tock......................................tick-tock
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 5:11:35 PM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:43 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > In article <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
won't to stock up on anti-depressants when after all the dust settles
I can still buy/own an AR-15 and high capacity magazines.,
> > In article <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
> > Lee Curtiss <clee...@verizon.com> wrote:
> >>Tracey12 wrote:
>
> >>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> regulations.
>
> >>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> >> Good.
>
> >> With the voting public hugely in favor of
> >>new gun laws that should make defeating said
> >>Republicans in the next election even easier.
>
> >>Tracey12 wrote:
>
> >>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> regulations.
>
> >>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> >> Good.
>
> >> With the voting public hugely in favor of
> >>new gun laws that should make defeating said
> >>Republicans in the next election even easier.
>
> > Actually, it will *help* them - they are the ones on the right side of the
> > issue (didn't you read the original post?).
>
> > It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the party - the ones still
> > fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone armed. And they *are* the ones
> > who deserve to get shafted by the voting public.
>
> > issue (didn't you read the original post?).
>
> > It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the party - the ones still
> > fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone armed. And they *are* the ones
> > who deserve to get shafted by the voting public.
>
> Yeah, I think he got it backwards.
>
> But the point is that the Republicans are cannibalizing their own, as
> befits the 'stupid' party.
>
> Perhaps Jindal should have said 'the party of the stupid'?- Hide quoted text -
>
> But the point is that the Republicans are cannibalizing their own, as
> befits the 'stupid' party.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Perhaps you should get back on your meds. Matter of fact you might
> - Show quoted text -
won't to stock up on anti-depressants when after all the dust settles
I can still buy/own an AR-15 and high capacity magazines.,
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 5:13:13 PM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 10:47 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 10:08 am, gaze...@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
> > On Jan 27, 10:08 am, gaze...@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
> > wrote:
> >> In article <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
>
> >> Lee Curtiss <clee...@verizon.com> wrote:
> >>>Tracey12 wrote:
>
> >>>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>>> regulations.
>
> >>>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> >>> Good.
>
> >>> With the voting public hugely in favor of
> >>>new gun laws that should make defeating said
> >>>Republicans in the next election even easier.
>
> >> Actually, it will *help* them - they are the ones on the right side of the
> >> issue (didn't you read the original post?).
>
> >> It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the party - the ones still
> >> fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone armed. And they *are* the ones
> >> who deserve to get shafted by the voting public.
>
> >> In article <t-edncb3lbw61pjMnZ2dnUVZ_u2dn...@giganews.com>,
>
> >> Lee Curtiss <clee...@verizon.com> wrote:
> >>>Tracey12 wrote:
>
> >>>> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>>> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>>> regulations.
>
> >>>> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> >>> Good.
>
> >>> With the voting public hugely in favor of
> >>>new gun laws that should make defeating said
> >>>Republicans in the next election even easier.
>
> >> Actually, it will *help* them - they are the ones on the right side of the
> >> issue (didn't you read the original post?).
>
> >> It will hurt and further marginalize the rest of the party - the ones still
> >> fighting the quixotic battle to keep everyone armed. And they *are* the ones
> >> who deserve to get shafted by the voting public.
>
> >> --
> >> They say compassion is a virtue, but I don't have the time!
>
> >> - David Byrne -
>
> > A word of advice. Before you try to "shaft" anyone you better make
> > sure they're not armed. Don't bring a latte' and a quiche to a
> > gunfight.
>
> David Koresh and Randy Weaver can tell you that the cops don't show up
> unarmed.- Hide quoted text -
> >> They say compassion is a virtue, but I don't have the time!
>
> >> - David Byrne -
>
> > A word of advice. Before you try to "shaft" anyone you better make
> > sure they're not armed. Don't bring a latte' and a quiche to a
> > gunfight.
>
> David Koresh and Randy Weaver can tell you that the cops don't show up
>
> - Show quoted text -
They could if the feds hadn't killed them, along with several dozen
> - Show quoted text -
innocent men, women and children, including Weaver's pregnant wife,
their son and dog. You should feel proud.
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 5:15:30 PM1/27/13
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
He's hiding the fact that he entered college as a foreign student to
> - Show quoted text -
get preference over some white American kid.
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
Jan 27, 2013, 5:17:48 PM1/27/13
to
On Jan 27, 11:15 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 10:11 am, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey
> > rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > really democrats hiding under our tent. We are going to sort the herd
> > and get back to being the party that believes in liberty vs. the fools
> > on the left taking our country down the road to a socialist communist
> > european death trap.
>
> ..and you'll continue to lose elections.
>
> Suits those of us on the upper half of the Bell Curve just fine...- Hide quoted text -
2010 and when Scott Walker won TWICE !! How'd that work for you? The
ONLY way liberals can hold on to power is to get as many people on
entitlements as possible. They have a good head start already.
> > On Jan 27, 10:11 am, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey
> > rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 27, 7:56 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>
> >>> > Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> > supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> > regulations.
>
> >>> > We will expose them to the voting public.
>
>
> >>> > Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
> >>> > supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
> >>> > regulations.
>
> >>> > We will expose them to the voting public.
>
> >>> That ought to put the final nail into the coffin of the Republican Party.
>
> >> Sure. You fucking beady eyed moonbats have been saying last rites over
> >> the Republican party for decades. How's that hopey/changey thing
> >> working for you?
>
> > These democrat morons dont understand that anti gun R.I.N.O.s are
>
> >> Sure. You fucking beady eyed moonbats have been saying last rites over
> >> the Republican party for decades. How's that hopey/changey thing
> >> working for you?
>
> > really democrats hiding under our tent. We are going to sort the herd
> > and get back to being the party that believes in liberty vs. the fools
> > on the left taking our country down the road to a socialist communist
> > european death trap.
>
> ..and you'll continue to lose elections.
>
> Suits those of us on the upper half of the Bell Curve just fine...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
yup, thats what you slavering, kool-aid guzzling useful idiots said in
> - Show quoted text -
2010 and when Scott Walker won TWICE !! How'd that work for you? The
ONLY way liberals can hold on to power is to get as many people on
entitlements as possible. They have a good head start already.
Mitchell Holman
Jan 27, 2013, 5:31:41 PM1/27/13
to
Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:57e8dabb-58f6-4540...@m10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
> On Jan 27, 10:11 am, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey
> rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 27, 7:56 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
>> > > supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
>> > > regulations.
>>
>> > > We will expose them to the voting public.
>>
>> > That ought to put the final nail into the coffin of the Republican
>> > Part
> y.
>>
>> Sure. You fucking beady eyed moonbats have been saying last rites
>> over the Republican party for decades. How's that hopey/changey thing
>> working for you?
>
> These democrat morons dont understand that anti gun R.I.N.O.s are
> really democrats hiding under our tent. We are going to sort the herd
> and get back to being the party that believes in liberty
What would the party of mandatory vaginal
probes and "papers please" police inspections
know about "liberty"?
news:57e8dabb-58f6-4540...@m10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
> On Jan 27, 10:11 am, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey
> rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 27, 7:56 am, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
>> > > supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
>> > > regulations.
>>
>> > > We will expose them to the voting public.
>>
>> > That ought to put the final nail into the coffin of the Republican
>> > Part
> y.
>>
>> Sure. You fucking beady eyed moonbats have been saying last rites
>> over the Republican party for decades. How's that hopey/changey thing
>> working for you?
>
> These democrat morons dont understand that anti gun R.I.N.O.s are
> really democrats hiding under our tent. We are going to sort the herd
> and get back to being the party that believes in liberty
probes and "papers please" police inspections
know about "liberty"?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Real America Patriot
Jan 27, 2013, 8:51:28 PM1/27/13
to
On Sunday, January 27, 2013 2:50:56 AM UTC-6, Tracey12 wrote:
> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
>
> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
>
> regulations.
>
>
>
> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
>
>
> Lets post the names of any Republicans who approve any new Obama
>
> supported anti gun policies which includes new legislation, or
>
> regulations.
>
>
>
> We will expose them to the voting public.
>
>
>
> Democrats should be exposed as well.
REAL AMERICANS WANT YOU ANTI-AMERICA GUN HUGGERS EXPOSED.
bill clinton
Jan 28, 2013, 12:23:08 AM1/28/13
to
Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>>>> A word of advice. Before you try to "shaft" anyone you
>>>> better make
>>>> sure they're not armed. Don't bring a latte' and a
>>>> quiche
>>>> to a
>>>> gunfight.
>>>
>>> David Koresh and Randy Weaver can tell you that the cops
>>> don't show up
>>> unarmed.
>>
>> apples and oranges...try again
>
> OK.
>>>> A word of advice. Before you try to "shaft" anyone you
>>>> better make
>>>> sure they're not armed. Don't bring a latte' and a
>>>> quiche
>>>> to a
>>>> gunfight.
>>>
>>> David Koresh and Randy Weaver can tell you that the cops
>>> don't show up
>>> unarmed.
>>
>> apples and oranges...try again
>
>
> David Koresh and Rndy Weaver can tell you that the cops
> don't show up
> unarmed.
>
> If you STILL can't understand that, ask the kid in the
> unarmed.
>
> next trailer
> for help.
Difference being is that my sheriff in *my* county has said
he won't allow feds to defy the constitution. How about
yours?
Not to mention the fact that 99.9% of gun owners aren't a
Randy Weaver or David Koresh
Besides you feel gooders got to get the laws past first and
that will never happen. Too many of your guys are up for
reelection and they know they'll lose their cushy jobs if
they do it. Your wackos like Feinstien are just flinging
shit and trying to see what sticks and your leader is just
giving you lip service.
The only thing that needs to be done is to *enforce* the
current gazillion gun laws on the books before they create
more that won't get enforced either.
Message has been deleted
0 new messages