ACL: Hate Speech Overreach Misses the Real Threat
Michael Barnett OAM
From: Michelle Pearse <miche...@acl.org.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 17:08
Subject: Hate Speech Overreach Misses the Real Threat
To: ...
MEDIA RELEASE
15 January 2026
Hate Speech Overreach Misses the Real Threat
The Australian Christian Lobby warns the Government’s hate speech reforms risk restricting ordinary Australians’ lawful speech.
The Bondi attack was inspired by radical Islamic ideology and fuelled by explicit antisemitism.
The ACL supports stronger protections against antisemitic hate and racial vilification, where such hatred is linked to extremist ideology, national security threats, or violence. However, expanding penalties across broad categories of belief risks suppressing legitimate debate and eroding fundamental freedoms without improving safety.
ACL CEO Michelle Pearse said the Government’s strategy risks punishing the wrong people.
“Groups campaigning against immigration risk being labelled a ‘hate group’ and shut down, and Christian leaders speaking out against trans ideology risk prison sentences.”
“These laws won’t work. They need to be targeted on the real threat. Conflating terrorism with everyday speech will not make Australia safer; it will only silence legitimate debate.”
The Australian Christian Lobby is calling for a targeted, effective approach that focuses on the extremist ideologies responsible for the most dangerous forms of hatred and antisemitism in Australia, while protecting the freedoms that are essential to a democratic society.
Media contact: Michelle Pearse | m: 0459 371 355 | e: Miche...@acl.org.au
This email was sent to ...
Australian Christian Lobby (ACL), Level 1, 18 National Circuit, Barton, ACT 2600, Australia
Unsubscribe
Michael Barnett OAM
Hate Speech Overreach Misses the Real Threat
In the wake of the Bondi attack, the Government has begun signalling a broad new approach to hate speech reform. While a stronger response to antisemitic hatred is both necessary and overdue, the proposals being floated risk sweeping far beyond the real threat. The danger is that ordinary Australians could find themselves punished for lawful speech while extremist ideology goes unchallenged.
The Bondi attack was driven by radical Islamic extremism and fuelled by explicit antisemitism. If the Government is serious about preventing further violence, its efforts must be concentrated on the ideologies that pose a national security risk, not everyday political or moral disagreement.
Australians need clarity. Stronger penalties against antisemitic hate and racial vilification make sense when they are tied to extremist ideology, violence or national security concerns. But expanding these penalties across broad categories of belief risks suppressing legitimate debate, ideological disagreement and religious conviction. It will not make Australia safer and it will not address the real crisis.
There is a growing concern that the Government’s approach could punish the wrong people. Groups campaigning on issues such as immigration could be labelled “hate groups” for advocating political reform. Christian leaders who preach biblical truth about gender and sexuality could find themselves facing prison sentences. This is not the hallmark of a confident democracy and it is not a solution to extremist violence.
Conflating terrorism with ordinary speech is a category error. It confuses disagreement with danger and mistakes dissent for hate. A strategy built on that confusion will not protect Jewish Australians or any other minority group. It will only silence legitimate debate and diminish the freedoms that allow society to confront dangerous ideas in the open, where they can be challenged and defeated.
Australia needs a targeted, effective approach that focuses on extremist ideologies responsible for the most serious forms of hatred and antisemitism in this country. Such an approach should protect vulnerable communities without criminalising ordinary citizens or placing religious conviction under suspicion.
Freedom of speech is not an obstacle to confronting extremism. It is one of the most important tools we have to expose and resist it. ACL will continue to advocate for reforms that keep Australians safe without eroding the fundamental freedoms that underpin a democratic society.
Chief Executive Officer