Of course you cannot understand my writings because you are mentally
deficient and are entirely reliant upon dialectics of impulsivity as
intrinsic to bestial replicant entities (ie. breeders)
The optimal means for doing so is to engage within mindfulness and that
would require that you are able to dynamically naturally associate the
correct realm of consciousness as any ubermensch would be spontaneously
capable of doing so...
... quite frankly you ought not waste your time and try engorgement
instead but with food...
On 23/6/19 11:07 am, Bruce S wrote:
> On 6/20/19 3:15 AM, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul wrote:
>> On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 2:35:28 PM UTC+10, dolf wrote:
>>> #315 - NATIONALISM IS DEAD
>>>
>>> Isn't it time for you Americans to solve your own political problems--as
>>> if the theft of the English language wasn't enough...
>> I guess it was only a matter of time before Dolf joined this thread to
>> regale us with his advice on the topic of drilling for Vegemite.
>> Tell us, Dolf, what size bit do you need? Is it true that smaller is
>> better?
>
> I haven't been following Dolt's ramblings. Is he still trying to push
> the "smaller is better" argument for things like drill bits? I guess
> his nephews are probably relieved their funny uncle is equipped like
> that.
- MINDFULNESS?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 24 June, 2019
Pick a time any time or day and see if you are able to intuit the
trinomial noumenon being the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. the
#41 - ONTIC premise to source of being)
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?time:11.49>
That’s mindfulness in a nutshell...
H7919@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 11 (#17); Ego: 5 (#11),
@3: Sup: 68 (#85); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 7 (#92); Ego: 20 (#88),
@5: Sup: 17 (#109); Ego: 10 (#98),
@6: Sup: 47 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 (#128),
Male: #156; Feme: #128
} // #371
#277 - HOMOIOS: RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST (10 SEPTEMBER 2001)
#288 - HETEROS: (11 SEPTEMBER 2001)
#371 - TORAH: SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE (12 SEPTEMBER 2001) v's #364 x
4 + #371 = #1827 as ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR / EUCHARIST
#315 - HOMOIOS: ORIGINAL SIN (13 SEPTEMBER 2001)
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?date:2001.9.10>
H7919@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
@3: Sup: 78 (#137); Ego: 20 (#78),
@4: Sup: 7 (#144); Ego: 10 (#88),
@5: Sup: 37 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 30
(#118),
@6: Sup: 51 (#232); Ego: 14 (#132),
Male: #232; Feme: #132
} // #381
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #350 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#371 as [#6, #5, #300, #20, #10, #30] / #381 as [#1, #300, #20, #10,
#30, #500] = sâkal (H7919): {UMBRA: #29 as #350 % #41 = #22} 1) to be
prudent, be circumspect, wisely understand, prosper; 1a) (Qal) to be
prudent, be circumspect; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to look at or upon, have
insight; 1b2) to give attention to, consider, ponder, be prudent; 1b3)
to have insight, have comprehension; i) insight, comprehension (subst);
1b4) to cause to consider, give insight, teach; i) the teachers, the
wise; 1b5) to act circumspectly, act prudently, act wisely; 1b6) to
prosper, have success; 1b7) to cause to prosper; 1c) (Piel) to lay
crosswise, cross (hands);
TIME ON 24 JANUARY 2019: “THE MONK WHO TAUGHT THE WORLD MINDFULNESS
AWAITS THE END OF THIS LIFE”
[<
https://time.com/5511729/monk-mindfulness-art-of-dying/>]
H4191@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 46 (#52); Ego: 40 (#46),
@3: Sup: 41 (#93); Ego: 76 (#122),
@4: Sup: 46 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 5 (#127),
Male: #139; Feme: #127
} // #451
How we have given them by comprehensible CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE on the
day being 8 MAY prior a means to distinguish the immateriality of the
binomial stasis: @1 - RETENTION (SELF IDENTITY), @5 - #CENTRE OF VALUE?,
#65 - SOLDIER, #175 - MARRIAGE as malefaction from its trinomial
metastasised grandeur without any discordance to their national
sensibilities (such transcendent thinking is above you) about the notion
of STATE:
#312 - HOMOIOS: CONTRADICTION
#315 - HOMOIOS: ORIGINAL SIN
#246 - HOMOIOS: NORMA OBLIGANS / ANGEL GABRIEL
#288 - HETEROS: REMEMBRANCE
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?date:2019.5.8>
It is the time of year as prior to EASTER and #315 - ONTIC / #409 v’s
#451 - TORAH AS ANZAC DAY which is particularly malicious and BARBARIC
to not have been more sensitive by their retraction.
8 MAY - AS ABOVE
9 MAY - VICTORY for EUROPE DAY (70 to 85 million deaths)
10 MAY - HETEROS {#451}
If our military for WWI and WWII were #492 - Volunteers they and we
already had freedoms... It is factually incorrect to say as Prime
Minister Mr Scott Morrison did at the Liberal Party launch 12 May 2019,
“THEY GIFTED US OUR FREEDOM.”
Such statement speaks to self entitlement and not a criteria of mind in
conformity to democratic first principles of Queen Victoria’s Letters
Patent as HEAVENLY GIFT to the nation by informed consensus.
#451 - RIGHT TO LIFE {Y-M-T-A} HAVING BY IMPETUS OF #41 - ONTIC
NECESSITY A MORAL ENTITLEMENT TO UNENCUMBERED #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL.
H4191@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 75 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 40 (#75),
@4: Sup: 4 (#144); Ego: 10 (#85),
@5: Sup: 80 (#224); Ego: 76 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
@6: Sup: 13 (#237); Ego: 14 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #237; Feme: #175
} // #505
#451 as [#6, #40, #400, #5] / #505 as [#30, #5, #40, #10, #400, #500] =
mûwth (H4191): {UMBRA: #18 as #446 % #41 = #36} 1) to die, kill, have
one executed; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to die; 1a2) to die (as penalty), be put
to death; 1a3) to die, perish (of a nation); 1a4) to die prematurely (by
neglect of wise moral conduct); 1b) (Polel) to kill, put to death,
dispatch; 1c) (Hiphil) to kill, put to death; 1d) (Hophal); 1d1) to be
killed, be put to death; i) to die prematurely;
"BUT OF THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL, THOU SHALT NOT EAT
OF IT: FOR IN THE DAY THAT THOU EATEST THEREOF THOU SHALT SURELY
DIE-H4191." [Genesis 2:17
Mindfulness is the psychological process of bringing one's attention to
experiences occurring in the present moment, which one can develop
through the practice of meditation and through other training.
Mindfulness is derived from sati, a significant element of Buddhist
traditions, and based on Zen, Vipassanā, and Tibetan meditation techniques.
Mindfulness practice has been employed to reduce symptoms of depression,
to reduce stress, anxiety, and in the treatment of drug addiction.
[<
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindfulness>]
Having slept upon the matter I would additionally say that mindfulness
enables one to contemplate at the ontic level without ontological
distractions, perturbance or disconcertion and when you awaken the
answer is there...
Each of these YOUTUBE clips convey ontic immutability:
YOUTUBE: “Safe in the arms”
<
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akCa9fqzgQg>
YOUTUBE: “We shall not be moved (Seekers)”
<
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfnygyqwxKA>
CONSIDER THEN THIS PROVERB: [You, can, lead, a, horse, to, water, but,
you, can't, make, him, drink]
[You, {@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 7 (#7)},
can, {@2: Sup: 44 (#105); Ego: 54 (#61)},
lead, {@3: Sup: 67 (#172); Ego: 40 (#101)},
a, {@4: Sup: 68 (#240); Ego: 1 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4})},
horse, {@5: Sup: 26 (#266); Ego: 20 (#122)},
to, {@6: Sup: 81 (#347); Ego: 17 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13})},
water, {@7: Sup: 79 (#426); Ego: 67 (#206)},
but, {@8: Sup: 77 (#503); Ego: 16 (#222)},
you, {@9: Sup: 57 (#560); Ego: 7 (#229)},
can't, {@10: Sup: 61 (#621); Ego: 11 (#240)},
make, {@11: Sup: 25 (#646); Ego: 66 (#306)},
him, {@12: Sup: 34 (#680); Ego: 57 (#363)},
drink] {@13: Sup: 2 (#682); Ego: 11 (#374)}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON IDEA @374: "SPECIMEN OF A JUDGMENT
ABOUT THE CRITIQUE WHICH PRECEDES THE INVESTIGATION: This sort of
judgment is to be found in the Gottingische gelehrte Anzeigen (first ed:
1739), the third part of the supplement, from 19 January 1782, pages 40 ff.1
If an author who is well acquainted with the object of his work, who has
been assiduous throughout in putting reflection into its composition
that is completely his own, falls into the hands of a reviewer who for
his part is sufficiently clear-sighted to espy the moments upon which
the worth or unworth of the piece actually rests, who does not hang on
words but follows the subject matter, and who examines and tests only
the principles from which the author has proceeded, then although the
severity of the judgment may certainly displease the author, the public
is, by contrast, [IDEA: @373] indifferent to it, for it profits thereby;
and the author himself can be content that he gets the opportunity to
correct or to elucidate his essays, which have been examined early on by
an expert, and, if he believes he is basically right, in this way to
remove in good time a stumbling block that could eventually be
detrimental to his work.
I find myself in a completely different situation with my reviewer. He
appears not at all to see what really mattered in the investigation with
which I have (fortunately or unfortunately) occupied myself, and,
whether it was impatience with thinking through a lengthy work, or
ill-temper over the threatened reform of a science in which he believed
he had long since put everything in order, or whether, as I reluctantly
surmise, it was the fault of a truly limited conception, through which
he could never think himself beyond his school metaphysics – in short,
he impetuously runs through a long series of propositions, with which
one can think nothing at all without knowing their premises, he
disperses his rebukes to and fro, for which the reader no more sees any
basis than he understands the propositions toward which they are
supposedly directed, and therefore the reviewer can neither help to
inform the public nor do me the least bit of harm in the judgment of
experts; consequently, I would have passed over this review completely,
if it did not provide me occasion for a few elucidations that in some
cases might save the reader of these Prolegomena from misconception.
In order, however, that the reviewer might adopt a viewpoint from which
he could, without having to trouble himself with any special
investigation, most easily present the entire work in a manner
disadvantageous to the author, he begins and also ends by saying: “this
work is a system of transcendental (or, as he construes it, higher)
idealism.” [IDEA: @374]
At the sight of this line I quickly perceived what sort of review would
issue thence – just about as if someone who had never seen or heard
anything of geometry were to find a Euclid, and, being asked to pass
judgment on it, were perhaps to say, after stumbling onto a good many
figures by turning the pages: “the book is a systematic guide to
drawing; the author makes use of a special language in order to provide
obscure, unintelligible instructions, which in the end can achieve
nothing more than what anyone can accomplish with a good natural eye,
and so on.”
Let us, however, look at what sort of idealism it is that runs through
my entire work, although it does not by far constitute the soul of the
system. The thesis of all genuine idealists, from the Eleatic School up
to Bishop *BERKELEY*, is contained in this formula: “All cognition
through the senses and experience is nothing but sheer illusion, and
there is #33 + #77 = #100 - *TRUTH* only in the ideas of pure
understanding and reason.”
WITH RESPECTS TO THE TRINOMIAL DEFINITION OF STATE AS SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY THAT BIBLICAL STORY OF THE WISE MEN AT JESUS BIRTH MAY BE
CONSIDERED THE FOCAL ESTABLISHMENT {ie. *THE* *TETRAGRAM’S*
*CORRELATION* *WITH* *THE* *WOMAN* *CONSTELLATION*} OF THIS TEMPORAL
MARKER IN HAVING A TRINOMIAL MEASURE OF JUDGEMENT CORRESPONDENCE THEN TO
HIS ACTUAL *DEATH*:
3 JANUARY + #91 = SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD
4 x #91 = #364 DAY / YEAR OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE SERVICE: 24 x 7 x 13 =
#2184 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE
#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY PROSCRIPTIONS: #205 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY AS CONSTITUTING:
#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE) BEING THE ORGANISATIONAL
PREMISE OF #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY BY THE EXERCISE OF INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS AS #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
3 JANUARY *PERIAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#420 - VAULT OF THE HEAVENS,
FIRMAMENT AS BINDING EARTH TO THE HEAVENS / #322 - FREE CITIZENS,
SOVEREIGN PEOPLE; POPULAR GOVERNMENT, *DEMOCRACY*; POPULAR ASSEMBLY} /
*HETEROS* {#404 - KEEP SECRET / #314 - PURPLE / MAGUS} / *TORAH* {#369 -
DIADEM / #337 - NAZARITE / CONSECRATED ONE}
3 JULY *APOAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#330 - FRIEND / REBELLIOUS /
#410 - YESHUA / KING} / *HETEROS* {#352 - A PROVING TRIAL / MARY / #421
- EXTREME WICKEDNESS} / *TORAH* {#373 - *FROM* *TRUTH* *INTO* *ERROR* /
#472 - *CURSE*}
DOLF @ 1853 HOURS ON 6 MARCH 2019: "But I ought to first explain that
within binomial terms the *STASIS* is the {
@1 - #33 [#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114
/ #342 - ANKH / ROMAN} - *SHARE* *THE* *SAME* *ANCESTOR*]
@5 - #77 [#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} -
*PROTECT* *EACH* *OTHER* {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}]
= #100 - *WHAT* *IS* *TRUTH*? AS THE ESTABLISHING OF A #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
H3651@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 50 (#80); Ego: 20 (#50),
@3: Sup: 19 (#99); Ego: 50 (#100),
Male: #99; Feme: #100
} // #100
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #70 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;
THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
I am not given to cursing.
#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177
#100 as [#30, #20, #50] = ken (H3651): {UMBRA: #26 as #70 % #41 = #29}
1) so, therefore, thus; 2) *RIGHT*, *JUST*, *HONEST*, *TRUE*,
*VERITABLE*; 1a) thus, so; 1b) just so; 1c) therefore; 1d) so...as
(paired with adv); 1e) then; 1f) forasmuch as (in phrase); 1g) (with
prep); 1g1) therefore, this being so (specific); 1g2) hitherto; 1g3)
therefore, on this ground (general); 1g4) afterwards; 1g5) in such case
adj; 2a) right, just, honest; 2b) correct; 2c) true, veritable; 2d)
true!, right!, correct! (in assent);
<
http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>
"AND GOD MADE THE FIRMAMENT, AND DIVIDED THE WATERS WHICH WERE UNDER THE
FIRMAMENT FROM THE WATERS WHICH WERE ABOVE THE FIRMAMENT: AND IT WAS SO
{#100 as [#30, #20, #50] = ken (H3651): so}." [Genesis 1:7 (KJV)]
} and what we are going to do [as an #273 - *ONTOLOGICAL* *PACIFIST*
stratagem] is to [then] cause the deterministic conduct of others to
effect their forfeiture [such *STASIS* basis to their status as a legal
entity is manifested by the characteristic of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL which adheres to a 64 element conception of number {ie.
2 x 2 x 2 x 2 {Decimal: 16 / Hex: 10} x 2 {Decimal: 32 / Hex: 20} x 2
{Decimal: 64 / Hex: 40} x 2 {Decimal: 128 / Hex: 80} x 2 {Decimal: 256 /
Hex: 100} = 256 as doubled extent to the {#3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9}
series as construction of magic squares totalling #16 {256 / #2056}
} as similarly the I CHING is comprised of only 64 HEXAGRAMS whereby in
4 BCE the POLAR OPPOSITES AND INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES were conveyed by
the Chinese DAOist syncretic philosophers as a TREATISE OF 4 ELEMENTS
MAPPED TO THE SOLSTICES / EQUINOXES AND THEN 60 X 6 + 7/80 DAYS = 365.25
DAYS / YEAR OF THE JULIAN CALENDAR] and assimilate [such impropriety]
into our [#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE AGGREGATIONS AND #164
- PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY AS REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR
AGGREGATIONS] reality as a [more substantial] capacity to define the
entire meta descriptor prototypes as a single verity of the paradigm
within equilibrium being then METASTASIS and the proof of concept of
this existing beyond the two polarities being the *PERIAPSIS* on 3
JANUARY and the *APOAPSIS* on 3 July that there is a static HYPOSTASIS
AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE
(Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]"
George *BERKELEY* (12 March 1685 – 14 January 1753) – known as Bishop
*BERKELEY* (Bishop of Cloyne) – was an Irish philosopher whose primary
achievement was the advancement of a theory he called "immaterialism"
(later referred to as "subjective idealism" by others). This theory
denies the existence of material substance and instead contends that
familiar objects like tables and chairs are only ideas in the minds of
perceivers and, as a result, cannot exist without being perceived.
*BERKELEY* is also known for his critique of abstraction, an important
premise in his argument for immaterialism.
In 1709, *BERKELEY* published his first major work, AN ESSAY TOWARDS A
NEW THEORY OF VISION, in which he discussed the limitations of human
vision and advanced the theory that the proper objects of sight are not
material objects, but light and colour. This foreshadowed his chief
philosophical work, A TREATISE CONCERNING THE PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN
KNOWLEDGE, in 1710, which, after its poor reception, he rewrote in
dialogue form and published under the title THREE DIALOGUES BETWEEN
HYLAS AND PHILONOUS in 1713.
In this book, *BERKELEY*'s views were represented by Philonous (Greek:
"lover of mind"), while Hylas (Greek: "matter") embodies the Irish
thinker's opponents, in particular John Locke. *BERKELEY* argued against
Isaac Newton's doctrine of absolute space, time and motion in DE MOTU
(ON MOTION), published 1721. His arguments were a precursor to the views
of Mach and Einstein. In 1732, he published ALCIPHRON, a Christian
apologetic against the free-thinkers, and in 1734, he published THE
ANALYST, a critique of the foundations of calculus, which was
influential in the development of mathematics.
[<
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Berkeley>]
THE PRINCIPLE THAT GOVERNS AND DETERMINES MY IDEALISM THROUGHOUT IS, ON
THE CONTRARY: “ALL COGNITION OF THINGS OUT OF MERE PURE UNDERSTANDING OR
PURE REASON IS NOTHING BUT SHEER ILLUSION, AND THERE IS #33 + #77 = #100
- *TRUTH* ONLY IN EXPERIENCE.”
"But that it spread no further among the people {#322 - FREE CITIZENS,
SOVEREIGN PEOPLE; POPULAR GOVERNMENT, *DEMOCRACY*; POPULAR ASSEMBLY},
let us straitly threaten them, that they speak {#404 - KEEP SECRET}
henceforth to no man in this name. And they called them, and commanded
them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus {#410 - YESHUA /
KING / #337 - NAZARITE / CONSECRATED ONE}.
But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in
the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. For
we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard. So when
they had further threatened them, they let them go, finding nothing
{#352 - A PROVING TRIAL / MARY / #421 - EXTREME WICKEDNESS} how they
might punish them, because of the people: for all men glorified God for
that which was done. For the man was above forty years old, on whom this
miracle of healing was showed. And being let go, they went to their own
company, and reported all that the chief priests and elders had said
unto them.
And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one
accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven {#420 -
VAULT OF THE HEAVENS, FIRMAMENT AS BINDING EARTH TO THE HEAVENS}, and
earth, and the sea, and all that in them is: Who by the mouth of thy
servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people
imagine vain things? The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers
were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ.
G225@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 31 (#32); Ego: 30 (#31),
@3: Sup: 39 (#71); Ego: 8 (#39),
@4: Sup: 48 (#119); Ego: 9 (#48),
@5: Sup: 53 (#172); Ego: 5 (#53),
@6: Sup: 63 (#235); Ego: 10 (#63),
@7: Sup: 64 (#299); Ego: 1 (#64),
@8: Sup: 33 (#332); Ego: 50 (#114),
Male: #332; Feme: #114
} // #114
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #64 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;
THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.
#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158
#114 as [#1, #30, #8, #9, #5, #10, #1, #50] = alḗtheia (G225): {UMBRA:
#0 as #64 % #41 = #23} 1) objectively; 1a) what is true in any matter
under consideration; 1a1) truly, in truth, according to truth; 1a2) of a
truth, in reality, in fact, certainly; 1b) what is true in things
appertaining to God and the duties of man, moral and religious truth;
1b1) in the greatest latitude; 1b2) the true notions of God which are
open to human reason without his supernatural intervention; 1c) *THE*
*TRUTH* *AS* *TAUGHT* *IN* *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*, *RESPECTING*
*GOD* *AND* *THE* *EXECUTION* *OF* *HIS* *PURPOSES* *THROUGH* *CHRIST*,
*AND* *RESPECTING* *THE* *DUTIES* *OF* *MAN*, *OPPOSING* *ALIKE* *TO*
*THE* *SUPERSTITIONS* *OF* *THE* *GENTILES* *AND* *THE* *INVENTIONS*
*OF* *THE* *JEWS*, *AND* *THE* *CORRUPT* *OPINIONS* *AND* *PRECEPTS*
*OF* *FALSE* *TEACHERS* *EVEN* *AMONG* *CHRISTIANS*; 2) subjectively;
2a) truth as a personal excellence; 2a1) *THAT* *CANDOUR* *OF* *MIND*
*WHICH* *IS* *FREE* *FROM* *AFFECTION*, *PRETENCE*, *SIMULATION*,
*FALSEHOOD*, *DECEIT*;
For of a #114 - *TRUTH* against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast
anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the
people of Israel, were gathered together, for to do whatsoever thy hand
and thy counsel determined before to be done.
VEXATIOUS SANCTIMONIOUS OPINIONS: {#5 + #6 = #11} AS COLLEGIUM OF
PONTIFFS FROM 510 BCE AS PONTIFICATED DEIFIED IGNORANCE AS NARCISSISM:
ROYAL ARCH FREEMASONRY CAPSTONE DISLOYALTY TO THE SOVEREIGN: #Aleph (1 -
#1), #He (5 - #5) = #6}
39 13 62
61 38 15
14 63 37 = #114 / #342 {#FIVE} AS TORAH PROTOTYPE BEING VASSAL TO ROMAN
EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
PLUS
46 6 62
54 38 22
14 70 30 = #114 / #342 {#SIX} AS HETEROS PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE
TORAH PROTOTYPE #FIVE {#114 / #342}
Nous: #38
Time:
Date:
Torah: [#40, #8, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
@3: Sup: 58 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 10 (#58),
Male: #146; Feme: #58
} // #58
Dao: Consequences for Virtuous Discourse
Tetra: #11 - Divergence
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Propulsator {God who vivifies all things} Alt: Yeyazel {God
Causes a Start} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST RABIES & FIERCE ANIMALS
2. THE LEARNED, ORATORS & AUTHORS
3. PRESS, BOOKS ETC
4. Astiro
}
Solar Eclipse: 8 (UTC) / 9 June 1918 (AEST) [During World War I: 28 July
1914 to 11 November 1918]
#175 CE
Prototype: HOMOIOS {#410 = #41 x 10 as ONTIC PREMISE / #349} / HETEROS
{#367 / #368} / *TORAH* {#361 / #365}
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:8,row:5,col:5,nous:38&PROTOTYPE:TORAH>
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 38 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #361 / #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from
Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25
- Contention, Ego: #365 / #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence]
HETEROS PROTOTYPE #SIX {#114 / #342}
Nous: #38
Time:
Date:
Torah: [#40, #8, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
@3: Sup: 58 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 10 (#58),
Male: #146; Feme: #58
} // #58
Dao: Consequences for Virtuous Discourse
Tetra: #11 - Divergence
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Propulsator {God who vivifies all things} Alt: Yeyazel {God
Causes a Start} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST RABIES & FIERCE ANIMALS
2. THE LEARNED, ORATORS & AUTHORS
3. PRESS, BOOKS ETC
4. Astiro
}
Solar Eclipse: 8 (UTC) / 9 June 1918 (AEST) [During World War I: 28 July
1914 to 11 November 1918]
#175 CE
Prototype: HOMOIOS {#372 / #343} / *HETEROS* {#351 / #373 - *FROM*
*TRUTH* *INTO* *ERROR*} / TORAH {#349 / #372}
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:8,row:8,col:2,nous:38&prototype:HETEROS>
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 8, col: 2, nous: 38 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #351 / #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning; Tetra: 1 -
Centre, Ego: #373 / #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence]
And now, Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto thy servants,
that with all boldness they may speak thy word, by stretching forth
thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be done by the name
of thy holy child Jesus. And when they had prayed, the place was shaken
where they were assembled together; and they were all filled with the
Holy Ghost, and they spake the word of God with boldness.
And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one
soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he
possessed was his own; but they had all things common. And with great
power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus:
and great grace was upon them all. Neither was there any among them that
lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and
brought the prices of the things that were sold, and laid them down at
the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according
as he had need." [Acts 4:17-35 KJV]
BUT THIS IS, OF COURSE, THE DIRECT OPPOSITE OF THE PREVIOUS, GENUINE
IDEALISM; HOW THEN DID I COME TO USE THIS EXPRESSION WITH A COMPLETELY
OPPOSITE INTENTION, AND HOW DID THE REVIEWER COME TO SEE GENUINE
IDEALISM EVERYWHERE?
The solution to this difficulty rests upon something that could have
been seen very easily from the context of the work, if one had wanted
to. Space and time, together with everything contained in them, are not
things (or properties of things) in themselves, but belong instead
merely to the appearances of such things; thus far I am of one creed
with the previous idealists. But these idealists, and among them
especially *BERKELEY*, viewed space as a merely empirical
representation, a representation which, just like the appearances in
space together with all of the determinations of space, would be known
to us only by means of experience or perception; [IDEA: @375] I show, on
the contrary, first: that space (and time as well, to which *BERKELEY*
gave no attention), together with all its determinations, can be
cognized by us a priori, since space (as well as time) inheres in us
before all perception or experience as a pure form of our sensibility
and makes possible all intuition from sensibility, and hence all
appearances. From this it follows: that, since #33 + #77 = #100 -
*TRUTH* rests upon universal and necessary laws as its criteria, for
*BERKELEY* experience could have no criteria of #33 + #77 = #100 -
*TRUTH*, because its appearances (according to him) had nothing
underlying them a priori; from which it then followed that experience is
nothing but sheer illusion, whereas for us space and time (in
conjunction with the pure concepts of the understanding) prescribe a
priori their law to all possible experience, which law at the same time
provides the sure criterion for distinguishing #33 + #77 = #100 -
*TRUTH* from illusion in experience.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%201.png>
<
http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>
My so-called (properly, critical) idealism is therefore of a wholly
peculiar kind, namely such that it overturns ordinary idealism, and such
that by means of it all cognition a priori, even that of geometry, first
acquires objective reality, which, without my proven ideality of space
and time, could not have been asserted by even the most zealous of
realists.
With matters standing so, I have wished that I could name this concept
of mine something else, in order to prevent all misunderstanding; but
this concept cannot be completely changed. I may therefore be permitted
in the future, as has already been stated above, to call it formal, or
better, critical idealism, in order to distinguish it from the dogmatic
idealism of *BERKELEY* and the skeptical idealism of Descartes.
I find nothing else worthy of note in the review of this book. Its
author judges en gros throughout, a mode that is cleverly chosen, since
it does [IDEA: @376] not betray one’s own knowledge or ignorance; a
single comprehensive judgment en de ́tail, if, as is proper, it had
considered the main question, would have perhaps exposed my error,
perhaps also the degree of the reviewer’s insight into investigations of
this kind. It was no ill-considered trick, for removing early on the
desire to read the book itself from readers who are used to forming a
conception of books from newspaper articles only, to recite one after
another a great many propositions, which, torn from the context of their
arguments and explications (especially as antipodean as these
propositions are in relation to all school metaphysics), must of
necessity sound nonsensical; to assault the reader’s patience to the
point of disgust; and then, after having introduced me to the witty
proposition that constant illusion is #33 + #77 = #100 - *TRUTH*, to
conclude with the harsh, though paternal, reprimand: To what end, then,
the conflict with accepted language, to what end, and whence, the
idealistic distinction?" [pages 124-127]
STUBBORN OX ...
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 23 June 2019