Shapelle - Incriminating photo?
tedf.
guilty by association. The family should stop spending money on her
defence.
http://www.thesundaymail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,19798319%255E903,00.html
Ted F.
TG'sFM
Ted F. wrote:
> Its looking more likely that she was guilty all along. <snip>
I'm not sure what you mean by "looking more likely". She has already
been PROVED to be guilty. There is no doubt whatsoever.
Bob Newbie
>I'm not sure what you mean by "looking more likely". She has already
>been PROVED to be guilty. There is no doubt whatsoever.
Wrong - she was only FOUND to be guilty.....there are undoubtedly lots
of people in jail who have been FOUND guilty who are in fact NOT
GUILTY, 'tho this of course does not necessarily include
Shapelle.....<shakes head and rolls eyes with the realisation that
this simple point needs to be explained to some dummies>
TG'sFM
Well it appears that it is ME who need to explain a simple point to
you. She was NOT ONLY found guilty, she was found guilty 'beyond a
reasonable doubt'. The indonesian legal system does NOT work on 'the
balance of probabilities' you know. Hope that helps.
Bob Newbie
>Well it appears that it is ME who need to explain a simple point to
>you. She was NOT ONLY found guilty, she was found guilty 'beyond a
>reasonable doubt'. The indonesian legal system does NOT work on 'the
>balance of probabilities' you know. Hope that helps.
Everyone knows the Indonesian legal system is a joke.
TG'sFM
Everyone? Other than you, who else thinks that? I'm sure Michelle
Corby isn't laughing. To the Indonesians, OUR legal system is a joke.
Considering murderers, rapist and sex offenders get off on
technicalities and people who fail to vote or who can't park parallel
get sent to the slammer. I think you should think before you post.
That is all.
Anthony Horan
> Its looking more likely that she was guilty all along. At least she is
> guilty by association.
There is no such thing. Oh, and you're a bigger moron than I thought if
you're buying in to a Murdoch smear campaign.
TG'sFM
You have to admit though, she certainly has a lot of drug dealing
associates. This isn't the first photo like this. Anyway, she can
sell her story when she gets out in 20 years.
Kelpie
"TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:1153036408.6...@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
She's already sold it to a Current Affairs story broker who specialises in
story hedging funds.
Shapelle has invested the fee in a leading mutual fund.
HTH
>
Kirilenko
She was always guilty. There was never any doubt. If you think
everyone who says "I didn't do it, I was framed" is telling the truth
there wont be anyone left in jail.
TG'sFM
Craig Welch wrote:
> Kirilenko wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:10:48 +1000, Ted F. wrote:
> >
> >> Its looking more likely that she was guilty all along. At least she is
> >> guilty by association. The family should stop spending money on her
> >> defence.
> >>
> >> http://www.thesundaymail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,19798319%255E903,00.html
> >>
> >> Ted F.
> >
> > She was always guilty. There was never any doubt.
>
> The court's job is to try to cut through the doubt.
>
> Indonesia's justice system is corrupt. And there were a number of
> discrepancies in the evidence presented. So doubt will remain.
>
> > If you think
> > everyone who says "I didn't do it, I was framed" is telling the truth
> > there wont be anyone left in jail.
>
> guilty. Why introduce such a non sequitur?
>
> Those who think she's not guilty aren't saying so because of her claims.
Craig,
You are backing the wrong horse with Corby. She IS guilty - no doubt
whatsoever. But on another point, how did you go with Temptation?
Stephen Oakes
<Ted F.> wrote in message news:6uljb2lburfi5bo6q...@4ax.com...
> Its looking more likely that she was guilty all along.
I don't think there was ever much doubt about her guilt.
--
Stephen Oakes
Stephen Oakes
"Craig Welch" <cr...@pacific.net.sg> wrote...
> Indonesia's justice system is corrupt. And there were a number of
> discrepancies in the evidence presented. So doubt will remain.
All true, but most of the "doubt" was foisted upon us by a hungry media.
> Those who think she's not guilty aren't saying so because of her claims.
No, mainly because of the media's claims and slant.
--
Stephen Oakes
JJJ
"Stephen Oakes" <soa...@XXXbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:Plqug.5846$tE5....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
There was, when there was an investigation into alleged baggage tampering by
airport staff. Also, doesn't the crime seem implausibly stupid?
Soixante Un Vieille Viande De Jour
Bob Newbie wrote:
As Paul Keating once said
"Bob, you are wrong, and a dickhead"
Stephen Oakes
"JJJ" <sp...@spam.spam> wrote...
>> I don't think there was ever much doubt about her guilt.
>
> There was, when there was an investigation into alleged baggage tampering
> by airport staff. Also, doesn't the crime seem implausibly stupid?
More stupid than baggage handlers transporting drugs through airports and
people's luggage?
Only stupid because she got caught. The drugs would easily have paid for
her trip there. I'm not saying she definitely did it, but I think it's more
likely than any of the other proposed scenarios, despite their constant
repetition by the media.
--
Stephen Oakes
^Temuchin^
Oh someone remembers Paul Keating
PeterL
At the time that photo was taken, Shapelle was getting quite a few
tourists coming in to talk to her and have their photo taken. That
arsewipe in the photo was one of the said tourists.
Because of wankers like you, she has since stopped the practice.
The same thing would happen if you were to have gone in there and your
photo appeared and everyone started to say "Shapelle is guilty because
she's been photographed with a complete wanker!!"
--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'
PeterL
@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>
> Bob Newbie wrote:
>> On 16 Jul 2006 00:19:22 -0700, "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>
>> >Well it appears that it is ME who need to explain a simple point to
>> >you. She was NOT ONLY found guilty, she was found guilty 'beyond a
>> >reasonable doubt'. The indonesian legal system does NOT work on
'the
>> >balance of probabilities' you know. Hope that helps.
>>
>> Everyone knows the Indonesian legal system is a joke.
>
> Everyone? Other than you, who else thinks that?
I do.
I have a good friend in Bali (his ancestors/family has been living on
the Island for nigh on 600 years) who told me that if I get pinged for
killing someone over there, not to worry because I'd only have to do a
year and then I could pay to get out.
The only people in the Indon jails are the people who can't afford the
bribes.
>I'm sure Michelle
> Corby isn't laughing.
No, she's not, because the stupid little monkeys are using her as a
scapegoat to rattle their sabres at Australia.
TG'sFM
Craig Welch wrote:
> horse at all. I think she's guilty. Surely you didn't read otherwise in
> my post? Surely you didn't read what you *thought* I wrote rather than
> what I wrote? Heh.
Yes, I often do that. I even type messages to myself reminding me of
the practise, but sometimes I forget. But back to Michelle Corby -
while there may always be some doubt, there isn't sufficient doubt.
That's good enough for the legal system, and it's good enough for me.
Lock her up and throw away the key.
PeterL
$23390$5a62...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au:
Yeah, everytime SUVVDJ sits down, he remembers Keating.
PeterL
75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
>
> Anthony Horan wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:10:48 +1000, Ted F. wrote:
>>
>> > Its looking more likely that she was guilty all along. At least she
is
>> > guilty by association.
>>
>> There is no such thing. Oh, and you're a bigger moron than I thought
if
>> you're buying in to a Murdoch smear campaign.
>
> You have to admit though, she certainly has a lot of drug dealing
> associates. This isn't the first photo like this.
The only other photo 'like this' was of the same guy, but they were
inside the Reception Area.
TG'sFM
PeterL wrote:
> "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in news:1153036408.695161.241760@
> 75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
>
> >
> > Anthony Horan wrote:
> >> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:10:48 +1000, Ted F. wrote:
> >>
> >> > Its looking more likely that she was guilty all along. At least she
> is
> >> > guilty by association.
> >>
> >> There is no such thing. Oh, and you're a bigger moron than I thought
> if
> >> you're buying in to a Murdoch smear campaign.
> >
> > You have to admit though, she certainly has a lot of drug dealing
> > associates. This isn't the first photo like this.
>
>
> The only other photo 'like this' was of the same guy, but they were
> inside the Reception Area.
The ones I was thinking of were taken in a highrise appartment on the
Gold Coast where her and her buddies were sniffing cocaine.
^Temuchin^
TG'sFM
PeterL wrote:
> Ted F. wrote in news:6uljb2lburfi5bo6q...@4ax.com:
>
> > Its looking more likely that she was guilty all along. At least she is
> > guilty by association. The family should stop spending money on her
> > defence.
> >
> > http://www.thesundaymail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,19798319
> %
> > 255E903,00.html
> >
>
>
> At the time that photo was taken, Shapelle was getting quite a few
> tourists coming in to talk to her and have their photo taken. That
> arsewipe in the photo was one of the said tourists.
> Because of wankers like you, she has since stopped the practice.
In the words of Benjamin Franklin 'He that lieth down with dogs, shall
rise up with fleas' She deserves everything she got, and is lucky she
didn't get the death penalty that she deserves.
TG'sFM
Craig Welch wrote:
> >> associates. This isn't the first photo like this.
>
> > The only other photo 'like this' was of the same guy, but they were
> > inside the Reception Area.
>
> with her drug dealing brother.
Wasn't it her brother that was involved in some shooting on the Gold
Coast about two weeks ago?
^Temuchin^
Darkfalz
They look awfully familiar, wouldn't you say?
TG'sFM
That's about as incrimating as you can get isn't it? That girl is
guilty.
^Temuchin^
>> Do you mean this picturegraph??
>>
>> http://www.farisqc.observationdeck.org/farisqc_images/Corby2.jpg
>
> That's about as incrimating as you can get isn't it? That girl is
> guilty.
>
I don't know what the arrows are pointing at but they should be pointing
at the bloodshot eyes
Strappelle is a very sexy girl
Darkfalz
>
> http://www.farisqc.observationdeck.org/farisqc_images/Corby2.jpg
Come on, she's never been involved with drugs! That's harmless tabacco!
And those guys she is with certainly don't look like druggie types, do
they?!
Kelpie
"Darkfalz" <darkf...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153116772.4...@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
The character quality of those guys look equal to P&O 'men of interest'
>
^Temuchin^
Leo Silvestri is taking the picture
JJJ
>
> "JJJ" <sp...@spam.spam> wrote...
>>> I don't think there was ever much doubt about her guilt.
>>
>> There was, when there was an investigation into alleged baggage tampering
>> by airport staff. Also, doesn't the crime seem implausibly stupid?
>
> More stupid than baggage handlers transporting drugs through airports and
> people's luggage?
>
Isn't it a plausible way for baggage handlers to traffick drugs? They
don't have access to trucks or other transport. It would be a plausible
way to make a few grand every month or so.
Darkfalz
Drug OD, no case on the P&O. Just the media's blindness to the nature
of women, insitsting a man must be behind whatever happened.
Fozzi
"JJJ" <sp...@spam.spam> wrote in message news:e9ees7$9b4$1...@nntp.aioe.org...
except that that investigation had nothing to do with either her OR dope, it
was an investigation of a cocaine ring not a pot ring
cheers
fozzi