Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Jodie Young - Nude

666 views
Skip to first unread message

Enj.

unread,
Mar 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/5/98
to

Anyone know if there is a web site with those great nude pix of ex
Wonderworld reporter Jodie Young?

Daniel Josef Dekok

unread,
Mar 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/5/98
to

Enj. (enjo...@remove.usa.net) wrote:
: Anyone know if there is a web site with those great nude pix of ex
: Wonderworld reporter Jodie Young?

No, but you could probably by the magazine they are in, and see them that
way.

Daniel
--
Daniel Dekok - ta...@bud.swin.edu.au
/=========================================================\
| aus.tv FAQ Maintainer and all round good guy |
| aus.tv FAQ on the WWW: http://www.oddball.net/talor/tv/ |
\=========================================================/

Zaphy

unread,
Mar 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/5/98
to

On Fri, 06 Mar 1998 05:32:23 +1100, enjo...@remove.usa.net (Enj.) regurgitated:

>>> Enj. (enjo...@remove.usa.net) wrote:
>>> : Anyone know if there is a web site with those great nude pix of ex
>>> : Wonderworld reporter Jodie Young?
>>>
>

>In article <6dm6dg$u86$1...@lucy.cc.swin.edu.au>, 080...@bud.swin.edu.au
>(Daniel Josef Dekok) wrote:
>
>> No, but you could probably buy the magazine they are in, and see them that
>> way.
>
>Why would you pay $7.95 for Australian Playboy - March edition, when you
>can see the pix free over the net?

indeed...try alt.mag.playboy and hope for the best....

Enj.

unread,
Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98
to

Fish!

unread,
Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98
to

In article <35022c9e...@news.cyberalink.com.au>,
tod...@cyberalink.com.au says...

> On Fri, 06 Mar 1998 05:32:23 +1100, enjo...@remove.usa.net (Enj.) regurgitated:
>

>
Possibly so they can spank themselves silly in the privacy of their
toilet?

The magazine has more than just pictures.
you doesn't need a computer to see the playboy magazine.


Fish!

unread,
Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98
to

In article <MPG.f69db88a...@news.mel.aone.net.au>, a...@123.net
says...
did I really type 'you doesn't' ?? I meant 'you'll don't not'

razz

unread,
Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98
to

Zaphy wrote:

> indeed...try alt.mag.playboy and hope for the best....

Tell me, does she have a bag over her ugly head. Nice legs. Shame about
the face.

Razz


chacmul

unread,
Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98
to

On Thu, 05 Mar 1998 21:47:27 +1100, enjo...@remove.usa.net (Enj.)
demonstrated genuine ignorance of the scientific method, leading me to
suspect we are dealing with a humanities student, when publishing the
following thesis:

>Anyone know if there is a web site with those great nude pix of ex
>Wonderworld reporter Jodie Young?

Having gone out of my way to, um, read the articles in the magazine (at
great embarrassment!) in the name of critical analysis, I must say that
I cannot see how the, um, articles could be described as "great".
Adequate, maybe, but nothing too brilliant.

I certainly can't see how they'd be worth $8.

One thing though - how does Jodie Young see this as a good career move?
Certainly, doing a nude pictorial won't enhance her journalistic
reputation or increase her credibility.


...W

--
Attn aus.sf.b5: If it hasn't been shown on Aus TV, I haven't seen it and thus am only speculating.
=========================================================================
"My fellow Americans, I want to emphasise that I never engaged in improper relations
with Ms Lewinsky. I'm pleased to tell you that today I've signed legislation that
will end such accusations forever. We begin bombing Iraq in five minutes."
- President Bill Clinton

Warren Tully <*> Chacmul <kla...@connexus.net.au%DELETE_THIS>
=========================================================================
My address (above) has a spamblocker. Please delete "%DELETE_THIS" to email.


loki

unread,
Mar 7, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/7/98
to

chacmul <kla...@connexus.net.au%DELETE_THIS> wrote:

>One thing though - how does Jodie Young see this as a good career move?
>Certainly, doing a nude pictorial won't enhance her journalistic
>reputation or increase her credibility.

I wouldn't call it a really *bad* move either, though. Considering she
worked as a reporter on Ten's Sex/Life show, it's clear that she isn't that
interested in doing "ordinary" or "real" journalism (as in, serious current
affairs stuff). I guess she would get a reasonable amount of publicity from
the pictorial... and maybe, in the end, it was a decision motivated by the
hip pocket.


--
loki
loki (at) nectar.com.au http://puck.nether.net/~loki/
# Dare I disturb the universe? You bet I do!


chacmul

unread,
Mar 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/8/98
to

On 7 Mar 98 00:17:15 GMT, lo...@REMOVE.nectar.com.au (loki) demonstrated
genuine ignorance of the scientific method when publishing the following
thesis:

>chacmul <kla...@connexus.net.au%DELETE_THIS> wrote:

>>One thing though - how does Jodie Young see this as a good career move?
>>Certainly, doing a nude pictorial won't enhance her journalistic
>>reputation or increase her credibility.

> I wouldn't call it a really *bad* move either, though. Considering she
>worked as a reporter on Ten's Sex/Life show, it's clear that she isn't that
>interested in doing "ordinary" or "real" journalism (as in, serious current
>affairs stuff). I guess she would get a reasonable amount of publicity from
>the pictorial... and maybe, in the end, it was a decision motivated by the
>hip pocket.

Actually, we don't really get to see her "hip pocket" in the
pictorial... :-)

Sure, she'll get some publicity from the pictorial - but will she get
employment or credibility? Fine, if she hopes to continue her career in
the more exploitative programs like Sex/Life, but that seems to me to be
an unnecessary narrowing of her career path. IMO, she is less likely to
find herself on the "family" infotainment programs (such as Getaway, Our
House etc) to whcih she previously seemed to be aspiring.


...W

--
Attn aus.sf.b5: If it hasn't been shown on Aus TV, I haven't seen it and thus am only speculating.
=========================================================================

Why is it that a drunk man can be persuaded to dance?

razz

unread,
Mar 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/8/98
to

chacmul wrote:

> Sure, she'll get some publicity from the pictorial - but will she get
> employment or credibility? Fine, if she hopes to continue her career
> in
> the more exploitative programs like Sex/Life, but that seems to me to
> be
> an unnecessary narrowing of her career path. IMO, she is less likely
> to
> find herself on the "family" infotainment programs (such as Getaway,
> Our
> House etc) to whcih she previously seemed to be aspiring.

Have you noticed that Wonderworld has spawned some of the most
rapaciously ambitious women of television? Jodie Young and Catriona
Rowntree are so desperately ambitious it hurts. I vaguely remember some
others (the surreal redhead) from whom ambition positively oozed on the
show. I wonder if Wonderworld wasn't (isn't?) the grooming ground for
some of the bits on the side of the Nein execs? I think some of them
would screw a snake if it would advance their careers.

Razz


chacmul

unread,
Mar 16, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/16/98
to

On Sun, 08 Mar 1998 14:21:32 +1100, razz <ra...@mail.hartingdale.com.au>

demonstrated genuine ignorance of the scientific method when publishing
the following thesis:

>Have you noticed that Wonderworld has spawned some of the most
>rapaciously ambitious women of television? Jodie Young and Catriona
>Rowntree are so desperately ambitious it hurts. I vaguely remember some
>others (the surreal redhead) from whom ambition positively oozed on the
>show. I wonder if Wonderworld wasn't (isn't?) the grooming ground for
>some of the bits on the side of the Nein execs? I think some of them
>would screw a snake if it would advance their careers.

To be honest, I suspect most personalities on TV are ruthlessly
ambitious - that's how they get to where they are. I doubt Jodie Young
is any more ambitious than, say, Andrew Daddo.

As for screwing a snake - yes, I also agree that most TV executives are
as low as a snake.


...W

--
Attn aus.sf.b5: If it hasn't been shown on Aus TV, I haven't seen it and thus am only speculating.
=========================================================================

"Old Age - it's the only disease you don't look forward to being cured of."
- Everett Sloane (Bernstein), Citizen Kain

Warren Tully <*> Chacmul <kla...@connexus.net.au%DELETE_THIS>

La Trobe University Biological Science student.

razz

unread,
Mar 16, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/16/98
to

chacmul wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Mar 1998 14:21:32 +1100, razz
> <ra...@mail.hartingdale.com.au>
> demonstrated genuine ignorance of the scientific method when
> publishing
> the following thesis:
>
> >Have you noticed that Wonderworld has spawned some of the most
> >rapaciously ambitious women of television? Jodie Young and Catriona
> >Rowntree are so desperately ambitious it hurts. I vaguely remember
> some
> >others (the surreal redhead) from whom ambition positively oozed on
> the
> >show. I wonder if Wonderworld wasn't (isn't?) the grooming ground for
>
> >some of the bits on the side of the Nein execs? I think some of them
> >would screw a snake if it would advance their careers.
>
> To be honest, I suspect most personalities on TV are ruthlessly
> ambitious - that's how they get to where they are. I doubt Jodie Young
>
> is any more ambitious than, say, Andrew Daddo.
>
> As for screwing a snake - yes, I also agree that most TV executives
> are
> as low as a snake.

No, I agree, they're all as ambitious, but what I'm talking about is
sheer naked ambition. At least Daddo and that ilk camouflage it a
little, whereas with the women mentioned it come off in waves.

Razz


0 new messages