Julian O'Neill gets married
Cam
with his bad behaviour.
Brisbane's 'Sunday Mail' acticle failed to mention the most important aspect
of the marriage. Julian's new bride, Nicole Carroll is pregnant. The
article gave the false impression that it was the perfect union stating -
'Rugby League bad boy Julian O'Neill wed his sweetheart in a private
ceremony yesterday.'
The 'Sunday Telegraph' ran a similar article but added the precnancy
fator.......and yes, the bride wore white. Let's hope this is the turning
point for Julian, he is one of the most talented footballers in the current
game, but should follow one rule...'No Alcohol.'
99% of the footballing public would give their eye tooth for 5% of his
talent.
Henry F Francis
Cam wrote:
Yes, I wish them both well.Having said that,she better have an umbrella handy if
he starts arriving home late.
Bear
<csh...@nsopam.logicworld.com.au> wrote:
>Yes it is hard to believe. Julian O'Neill finally found somebody to put up
>with his bad behaviour.
>
>Brisbane's 'Sunday Mail' acticle failed to mention the most important aspect
>of the marriage. Julian's new bride, Nicole Carroll is pregnant. The
>article gave the false impression that it was the perfect union stating -
>'Rugby League bad boy Julian O'Neill wed his sweetheart in a private
>ceremony yesterday.'
>
>The 'Sunday Telegraph' ran a similar article but added the precnancy
>fator.......and yes, the bride wore white. Let's hope this is the turning
>point for Julian, he is one of the most talented footballers in the current
>game, but should follow one rule...'No Alcohol.'
Ironically, last weekend the Sunday Telegraph (I think it was)
reported that the girl who had "turned Julian around" was booked for
you guessed it...drink driving.
----------------
Edward Humphries
ehumphri@"go-away".mail.usyd.edu.au
<I'm sure you can work it out>
"The XB Falcon is the single greatest achievement of the 20th century"
Wade Singleton
<csh...@nsopam.logicworld.com.au> wrote:
> Yes it is hard to believe. Julian O'Neill finally found somebody to put up
> with his bad behaviour.
What bad behaviour are you talking about? Not something that happened years
ago maybe? My information tells me he has been nothing but an inspiration to
his fellow team mates for his dedication to the club and off season
training.
Wade
RobSm
>In article <36a1...@news.ausmail.com> , "Cam"
><csh...@nsopam.logicworld.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Yes it is hard to believe. Julian O'Neill finally found somebody to put up
>> with his bad behaviour.
>
>What bad behaviour are you talking about? Not something that happened years
>ago maybe? My information tells me he has been nothing but an inspiration to
>his fellow team mates...
ah yes...the Wynyard Wankers..iirc
Phil Hobbs
>What bad behaviour are you talking about? Not something that happened
years
>ago maybe? My information tells me he has been nothing but an
inspiration to
>training.
That would make this "off-season" his good behavioural period Wade.
Śo)
Phil
CA
>Yes it is hard to believe. Julian O'Neill finally found somebody to put up
>with his bad behaviour.
>
>
>The 'Sunday Telegraph' ran a similar article but added the precnancy
>fator.......and yes, the bride wore white.
Appologies for the off-topic post, but is this really relevant in a
country where ~98% of women are NOT virgins at marriage?
Colin
(living in the 90s)
Mick
>
>Appologies for the off-topic post, but is this really relevant in a
>country where ~98% of women are NOT virgins at marriage?
Not at all. I think the original article was more about the different
angles covered by the Sydney and Brisbane papers, rather than the pregnancy
itself.
The Brisbane paper ran the story with all nice pics and didn't mention the
pregnancy, whilst the Sydney papers made an issue of it. I had both
articles side by side and the difference in the two stories was quite
remarkable.
I still don't know who the villain is. The paper that didn't tell us about
the pregnancy, or the one who made something of something that wasn't
relevant.