info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: -- GRUMBLE prototype update 30 April 2019: DETERMINATION OF ONTOLOGICAL IMPOST UPON ONTIC NECESSITY PROSCRIPTIONS
0 views
Skip to first unread message
dolf
Apr 29, 2019, 7:00:59 PM4/29/19
to
In case you hadn't noticed since you have no cogent acumen (shit
excepted) that consequentially to that astute retort of mine, it is all
quiet on the western front...
... you notice now that we are able to give an acute attenuation to our
responses.
In technical terms we are prototyping cohering your responses to the
NOUMENON so that we may determine the nature of your ONTIC premise as
causal / driver for existence and once we are satisfied that we have an
understanding for your fixations we will direct our attention towards
their *NULLIFICATION*
YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who: Every Dalek Extermination"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9HdrWCBsE>
What we want to achieve is an FORM{} object implementation of the
IDENTITY COHESION ASS DISCREET {% #81} AUTONOMONY BY PROVISION OF ONTIC
{% #41} NECESSITY DEFINITIONS INTO AGGREGATIONS OF MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS
AS THEN THE DETERMINATION OF ANY ONTOLOGICAL IMPOST UPON ONTIC NECESSITY
AS TRAVESTY OF THE PERENNIALIST BINOMIAL {A-U-M} STASIS BASIS AS A
DICHOTOMIC AND INCOMMENSURATE METHODOLOGY.
THESE CAN THEN BE APPLIED TO A *THINKING*[] QUEUE DERIVED FROM THE
NUMEROUS *POSSIBILITY* *RULESETS* {} OBJECTS THAT FUNCTION LIKE OUR
FORMS {} OBJECTS THAT ONCE HAVING INSTANTIATION WILL THEN PERFORM
CERTAIN MICROCOSM WHAT-IF-THEN OPERATIONS AGAINST THE NOUMENON
THAT THE THINKING PROCESS ITSELF AS MACHINATIONS MIGHT BE CONSIDERED
LIKE THE COHESION OF A CHESSBOARD TO USE A TWO DIMENSIONAL ANALOGUE AS
CONSISTING BY DISCRETE PATTERNS OF OPERATIONS WHICH OCCUR IN SEQUENTIAL
ORDER, THUSLY WE WANT TO CONSIDER THE MERIT OF A *THINKING*[] QUEUE AND
NUMEROUS *POSSIBILITY* *RULESETS* {} OBJECTS THAT FUNCTION LIKE OUR
FORMS {} OBJECTS THAT ONCE HAVING INSTANTIATION WILL THEN PERFORM
CERTAIN MICROCOSM WHAT-IF-THEN OPERATIONS AGAINST THE NOUMENON AND ANY
CRITERIA OF EVENTS, WATCHES, ONTIC OBLIGANS OR MESHED HIERARCHIES TO
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING TO THEN CONVEY THE RESULTS.
@1 - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} AS FOUNDATIONAL STONE
(31 MAY) TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 BEING
INSTRUMENTATION TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901 /
#1 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @1 - THESIS;
*DETERMINATION* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *IMPOST* *UPON* *ONTIC* *NECESSITY*
*PROSCRIPTIONS*
@2 - FORMULA OF HUMANITY: @205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF
PROBITY / #2 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 - #81 = #231}; @2 -
ANTI-THESIS;
@3 - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: @82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
/ #3 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION {#273 v's #288}; @3 - SYNTHESIS;
@4 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: @164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <—
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS / #4 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC} @4 - PROGRESSION / @1 - PROGRESSION;
@5 - FORMULA OF KANONICOS {GK: ΚᾸΝΟΝῘΚΌΣ #352 / #329 - 1ST JANUARY
"INTER GRAVISSIMAS PASTORALIS OFFICII NOSTRI CURAS…" PAPAL BULL ISSUED
BY POPE GREGORY XIII ON 24 FEBRUARY 1582} PRINCIPLES: @123 / #2188 -
SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT / #5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY} @2 - SYNTHESIS;
KANONICOS@[
κ, {@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20)},
α, {@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21)},
ν, {@3: Sup: 71 (#112); Ego: 50 (#71)},
ο, {@4: Sup: 60 (#172); Ego: 70 (#141)},
ν, {@5: Sup: 29 (#201); Ego: 50 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32})},
ι, {@6: Sup: 39 (#240); Ego: 10 (#201)},
κ, {@7: Sup: 59 (#299); Ego: 20 (#221)},
ο, {@8: Sup: 48 (#347); Ego: 70 (#291)},
ς {@9: Sup: 5 (#352); Ego: 38 (#329)}
] // *AMONG* *THE* *MOST* *SERIOUS* *DUTIES* *OF* *OUR* *PASTORAL* *OFFICE*…
@6 - FORMULA OF EMANATION: @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT / #6 - OBLIGATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION}: BINOMIAL
{@1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE AS EMANATION} STASIS NOMENCLATURE @3 -
ANTI-THESIS;
AS AN OPTIMAL TEMPLATE OF AGREEMENT WHICH IS ONTIC / MATHEMATICAL AND
SUITABLE FOR A GLOBAL SAPIENT ECONOMY / #7 - MANIFESTING NORM {PRINCIPLE
OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION} @4 - THESIS;
Nous: #53
Time:
Date: 2019.4.30
Torah: [#10, #200, #400]@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 48 (#58); Ego: 38 (#48),
@3: Sup: 43 (#101); Ego: 76 (#124),
Male: #101; Feme: #124
} // #610
Dao: Increasing Evidence, Gaining Insight
Tetra: #53 - Eternity
I-Ching: H13 - Fellowship, Companionship, Concording People, Fellowship
with men, Gathering men
Latin: Quaestus {God quick to help} Alt: Mashyah {Pledge of God} {
1. AIDS & PROTECTS AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, BOTH VISIBLE & INVISIBLE
2. MYSTIC FEELINGS
3. SACRED PHILOSOPHY
4. Phupe
}
Salmon {Peaceable; perfect; he that rewards}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#498 / #403} / HETEROS {#454 / #381} / TORAH {#497
/ #362}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:5,row:1,col:2,nous:53&lexicon:H935>
.jackNote@zen: 5, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 53 [Date: 2019.4.30, Time:
(none), Super: #498 / #65 - Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity; I-Ching:
H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 - Watch, Ego:
#403 / #53 - Increasing Evidence, Gaining Insight; I-Ching: H13 -
Fellowship, Companionship, Concording People, Fellowship with men,
Gathering men; Tetra: 53 - Eternity]
On 29/4/19 9:04 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
<screamin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, April 28, 2019 at 8:20:18 AM UTC+10, dolf wrote:
>
> <JUST GIBBERISH>
>
> Trust Dolf to come running when you mention somebody is getting raped
with an 8-page essay.
>
> He wants to wave his 900-page grapple at you to show you who is boss.
>
Our next stage of development for the GRUMBLE prototype is to implement
the CALENDAR FORM{} object without any YEAR constraint and then direct
our attention towards the CHAT FORM{} object and .jackNote / @memeBrain
document cascade which we envision will be augmented by a hybridized
FORM{} object which then references an INSTANCE[] EVENT array.
var event = getHandle(GENHANDLE.UNIQUE);
INSTANCE[event] = {
... details of event ...
.jackNote / @memeBrain
}
On 24/4/19 7:11 pm, dolf wrote:
> An example of the THINKING PROCESS is the capacity to form an enquiry via
> the *POSSIBILITY* *RULESETS* {} OBJECTS to then obtain the date of birth
> for two persons or events and determine from the relevant SUPERNAL and EGO
> hierarchies what are the INTERSECTIONS and ONTIC OBLIGANS as criteria for
> any COHESION.
>
> If there is no viable INTERSECTION then there is no possibility of
> COHESION.
>
> Could we then determine from SPEECH / EVENTS what is the likely criteria of
> association or of any propensity for cosmic elasticity (a hypothetical
> proposition).
>
> If there is no viable INTERSECTION as BLOTTING with SPEECH / EVENTS then
> there is no possibility of COHESION.
>
> That’s just one type of ENQUIRY which I wish to resolve.
>
> - dolf
>
> dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> We've implemented a callback function() for the DATAQUEUE[] and
>> recognize that whilst it has a higher memory resource usage it ought to
>> be deployed for only microcosm processes, but will nevertheless provide
>> us will a higher capability of functionality since the callback
>> function() can be dynamically changed as required and necessary when the
>> prototype is further developed...
>>
>> case (obj.dataType == "VERSE_request" && obj.format == "kjv") :
>>
>> d3.json([stub, obj.format, '/', obj.section, '/', obj.seek,
>> '.json'].join('')) // obj.seek
>> .then(function (data) {
>>
>> BIBLOS[obj.ref] = data;
>>
>> if (typeof(obj.callback) === 'function')
>> obj.callback(obj.id, obj.strongs, obj.ref);
>>
>> nextDataQueueProcess(2);
>>
>> })
>>
>> That's sufficient for today and we'll begin working on an enhanced
>> lexicon expansion capability tomorrow.
>>
>> THAT THE THINKING PROCESS ITSELF AS MACHINATIONS MIGHT BE CONSIDERED
>> LIKE THE COHESION OF A CHESSBOARD TO USE A TWO DIMENSIONAL ANALOGUE AS
>> CONSISTING BY DISCRETE PATTERNS OF OPERATIONS WHICH OCCUR IN SEQUENTIAL
>> ORDER, THUSLY WE WANT TO CONSIDER THE MERIT OF A *THINKING*[] QUEUE AND
>> NUMEROUS *POSSIBILITY* *RULESETS* {} OBJECTS THAT FUNCTION LIKE OUR
>> FORMS {} OBJECTS THAT ONCE HAVING INSTANTIATION WILL THEN PERFORM
>> CERTAIN MICROCOSM WHAT-IF-THEN OPERATIONS AGAINST THE NOUMENON AND ANY
>> CRITERIA OF EVENTS, WATCHES, ONTIC OBLIGANS OR MESHED HIERARCHIES TO
>> CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING TO THEN CONVEY THE RESULTS.
>>
>> TO THAT PROCESS WE MIGHT THEN APPLY PROBABILITY FUNCTIONS AND HOPEFULLY
>> SOMEONE MAY HAVE A JAVASCRIPT LIBRARY BY WHICH WE CAN DEPLOY THOSE
>> CHARACTERISTICS
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> On 23/4/19 2:58 pm, dolf wrote:
>>> We've been so busy over the PASSOVER LONG WEEKEND such that we've had to
>>> take a day's break and hope in the next couple of days to expand our
>>> GRUMBLE prototype to focus on the lexicon expansion capabilities within
>>> our BIBLE QUOTES FORM object {} ...
>>>
>>> This will involve:
>>>
>>> a) implementing a CALLBACK functionality within the DATAQUEUE[]
>>> processing so that there is a singular function() for the process of
>>> lexicon expansion within the Bible narrative.
>>>
>>
>> DATAQUEUE[DATAQUEUE.length] = {
>>
>> dataType: 'VERSE_request',
>> callback: function (id, strongs, ref) {
>>
>> var bubble = document.getElementById(id);
>>
>> biblosExpand.setRules({
>> includeFocusStrongs: true,
>> includeOtherStrongs: false
>> });
>>
>> if (bubble)
>> bubble.innerHTML = [
>> '"', '<font color="blue">', biblosExpand.get (strongs, BIBLOS[ref]),
>> '</font>', '" ',
>> '[<strong>', BIBLOS[ref].book, ' ', BIBLOS[ref].chapter, ':',
>> BIBLOS[ref].verse, '</strong>]'
>> ].join('');
>>
>> },
>> format: "kjv",
>> priority: true,
>> id: [id, '.', obj.strongs, '.', longSections[chapter], '@',
>> STRONGS[obj.strongs].link[chapter][r]].join(''),
>> strongs: obj.strongs,
>> ref: [longSections[chapter], '@',
>> STRONGS[obj.strongs].link[chapter][r]].join(''),
>> section: longSections[chapter],
>> seek: chapter + padnum(ref[0]) + padnum(ref[1])
>> }
>>
>>> b) the lexicon expansion capability within the Bible narrative we
>>> envision will involve the capacity to highlight selective Bible verses
>>> for any designated expansion as either Other OR Focus STRONGS entries.
>>> We are adopting this approach so as to reduce any unnecessary IO
>>> requests and eliminate unnecessary processing of the lexicon expansion.
>>>
>>> However with a single line of code we've today implemented the LEXICON
>>> search option which is no longer reliant upon any exacting ZEN, ROW, COL
>>> construct
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?lexicon:h926>
>>>
>>> switch(true) {
>>> case (typeof(STRONGS[this.params.strongs].data.gematria[this.params.s])
>>> != "undefined") :
>>> obj.mode = 1;
>>> obj.telos = this.params.s;
>>> break;
>>>
>>> case (typeof(STRONGS[this.params.strongs].data.gematria[this.params.e])
>>> != "undefined") :
>>> obj.mode = 0;
>>> obj.telos = this.params.e;
>>> break;
>>>
>>> default:
>>> for (var is in STRONGS[this.params.strongs].data.gematria)
>>> break;
>>> obj.mode = 0;
>>> obj.telos = is;
>>> }
>>>
>>> We anticipate working on the CALLBACK DATAQUEUE[] process tomorrow being
>>> the 24 APRIL 2019.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
excepted) that consequentially to that astute retort of mine, it is all
quiet on the western front...
... you notice now that we are able to give an acute attenuation to our
responses.
In technical terms we are prototyping cohering your responses to the
NOUMENON so that we may determine the nature of your ONTIC premise as
causal / driver for existence and once we are satisfied that we have an
understanding for your fixations we will direct our attention towards
their *NULLIFICATION*
YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who: Every Dalek Extermination"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9HdrWCBsE>
What we want to achieve is an FORM{} object implementation of the
IDENTITY COHESION ASS DISCREET {% #81} AUTONOMONY BY PROVISION OF ONTIC
{% #41} NECESSITY DEFINITIONS INTO AGGREGATIONS OF MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS
AS THEN THE DETERMINATION OF ANY ONTOLOGICAL IMPOST UPON ONTIC NECESSITY
AS TRAVESTY OF THE PERENNIALIST BINOMIAL {A-U-M} STASIS BASIS AS A
DICHOTOMIC AND INCOMMENSURATE METHODOLOGY.
THESE CAN THEN BE APPLIED TO A *THINKING*[] QUEUE DERIVED FROM THE
NUMEROUS *POSSIBILITY* *RULESETS* {} OBJECTS THAT FUNCTION LIKE OUR
FORMS {} OBJECTS THAT ONCE HAVING INSTANTIATION WILL THEN PERFORM
CERTAIN MICROCOSM WHAT-IF-THEN OPERATIONS AGAINST THE NOUMENON
THAT THE THINKING PROCESS ITSELF AS MACHINATIONS MIGHT BE CONSIDERED
LIKE THE COHESION OF A CHESSBOARD TO USE A TWO DIMENSIONAL ANALOGUE AS
CONSISTING BY DISCRETE PATTERNS OF OPERATIONS WHICH OCCUR IN SEQUENTIAL
ORDER, THUSLY WE WANT TO CONSIDER THE MERIT OF A *THINKING*[] QUEUE AND
NUMEROUS *POSSIBILITY* *RULESETS* {} OBJECTS THAT FUNCTION LIKE OUR
FORMS {} OBJECTS THAT ONCE HAVING INSTANTIATION WILL THEN PERFORM
CERTAIN MICROCOSM WHAT-IF-THEN OPERATIONS AGAINST THE NOUMENON AND ANY
CRITERIA OF EVENTS, WATCHES, ONTIC OBLIGANS OR MESHED HIERARCHIES TO
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING TO THEN CONVEY THE RESULTS.
@1 - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} AS FOUNDATIONAL STONE
(31 MAY) TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 BEING
INSTRUMENTATION TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901 /
#1 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @1 - THESIS;
*DETERMINATION* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *IMPOST* *UPON* *ONTIC* *NECESSITY*
*PROSCRIPTIONS*
@2 - FORMULA OF HUMANITY: @205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF
PROBITY / #2 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 - #81 = #231}; @2 -
ANTI-THESIS;
@3 - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: @82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
/ #3 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION {#273 v's #288}; @3 - SYNTHESIS;
@4 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: @164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <—
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS / #4 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC} @4 - PROGRESSION / @1 - PROGRESSION;
@5 - FORMULA OF KANONICOS {GK: ΚᾸΝΟΝῘΚΌΣ #352 / #329 - 1ST JANUARY
"INTER GRAVISSIMAS PASTORALIS OFFICII NOSTRI CURAS…" PAPAL BULL ISSUED
BY POPE GREGORY XIII ON 24 FEBRUARY 1582} PRINCIPLES: @123 / #2188 -
SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT / #5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY} @2 - SYNTHESIS;
KANONICOS@[
κ, {@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20)},
α, {@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21)},
ν, {@3: Sup: 71 (#112); Ego: 50 (#71)},
ο, {@4: Sup: 60 (#172); Ego: 70 (#141)},
ν, {@5: Sup: 29 (#201); Ego: 50 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32})},
ι, {@6: Sup: 39 (#240); Ego: 10 (#201)},
κ, {@7: Sup: 59 (#299); Ego: 20 (#221)},
ο, {@8: Sup: 48 (#347); Ego: 70 (#291)},
ς {@9: Sup: 5 (#352); Ego: 38 (#329)}
] // *AMONG* *THE* *MOST* *SERIOUS* *DUTIES* *OF* *OUR* *PASTORAL* *OFFICE*…
@6 - FORMULA OF EMANATION: @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT / #6 - OBLIGATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION}: BINOMIAL
{@1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE AS EMANATION} STASIS NOMENCLATURE @3 -
ANTI-THESIS;
AS AN OPTIMAL TEMPLATE OF AGREEMENT WHICH IS ONTIC / MATHEMATICAL AND
SUITABLE FOR A GLOBAL SAPIENT ECONOMY / #7 - MANIFESTING NORM {PRINCIPLE
OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION} @4 - THESIS;
Nous: #53
Time:
Date: 2019.4.30
Torah: [#10, #200, #400]@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 48 (#58); Ego: 38 (#48),
@3: Sup: 43 (#101); Ego: 76 (#124),
Male: #101; Feme: #124
} // #610
Dao: Increasing Evidence, Gaining Insight
Tetra: #53 - Eternity
I-Ching: H13 - Fellowship, Companionship, Concording People, Fellowship
with men, Gathering men
Latin: Quaestus {God quick to help} Alt: Mashyah {Pledge of God} {
1. AIDS & PROTECTS AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, BOTH VISIBLE & INVISIBLE
2. MYSTIC FEELINGS
3. SACRED PHILOSOPHY
4. Phupe
}
Salmon {Peaceable; perfect; he that rewards}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#498 / #403} / HETEROS {#454 / #381} / TORAH {#497
/ #362}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:5,row:1,col:2,nous:53&lexicon:H935>
.jackNote@zen: 5, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 53 [Date: 2019.4.30, Time:
(none), Super: #498 / #65 - Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity; I-Ching:
H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 - Watch, Ego:
#403 / #53 - Increasing Evidence, Gaining Insight; I-Ching: H13 -
Fellowship, Companionship, Concording People, Fellowship with men,
Gathering men; Tetra: 53 - Eternity]
On 29/4/19 9:04 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
<screamin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, April 28, 2019 at 8:20:18 AM UTC+10, dolf wrote:
>
> <JUST GIBBERISH>
>
> Trust Dolf to come running when you mention somebody is getting raped
with an 8-page essay.
>
> He wants to wave his 900-page grapple at you to show you who is boss.
>
Our next stage of development for the GRUMBLE prototype is to implement
the CALENDAR FORM{} object without any YEAR constraint and then direct
our attention towards the CHAT FORM{} object and .jackNote / @memeBrain
document cascade which we envision will be augmented by a hybridized
FORM{} object which then references an INSTANCE[] EVENT array.
var event = getHandle(GENHANDLE.UNIQUE);
INSTANCE[event] = {
... details of event ...
.jackNote / @memeBrain
}
On 24/4/19 7:11 pm, dolf wrote:
> An example of the THINKING PROCESS is the capacity to form an enquiry via
> the *POSSIBILITY* *RULESETS* {} OBJECTS to then obtain the date of birth
> for two persons or events and determine from the relevant SUPERNAL and EGO
> hierarchies what are the INTERSECTIONS and ONTIC OBLIGANS as criteria for
> any COHESION.
>
> If there is no viable INTERSECTION then there is no possibility of
> COHESION.
>
> Could we then determine from SPEECH / EVENTS what is the likely criteria of
> association or of any propensity for cosmic elasticity (a hypothetical
> proposition).
>
> If there is no viable INTERSECTION as BLOTTING with SPEECH / EVENTS then
> there is no possibility of COHESION.
>
> That’s just one type of ENQUIRY which I wish to resolve.
>
> - dolf
>
> dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> We've implemented a callback function() for the DATAQUEUE[] and
>> recognize that whilst it has a higher memory resource usage it ought to
>> be deployed for only microcosm processes, but will nevertheless provide
>> us will a higher capability of functionality since the callback
>> function() can be dynamically changed as required and necessary when the
>> prototype is further developed...
>>
>> case (obj.dataType == "VERSE_request" && obj.format == "kjv") :
>>
>> d3.json([stub, obj.format, '/', obj.section, '/', obj.seek,
>> '.json'].join('')) // obj.seek
>> .then(function (data) {
>>
>> BIBLOS[obj.ref] = data;
>>
>> if (typeof(obj.callback) === 'function')
>> obj.callback(obj.id, obj.strongs, obj.ref);
>>
>> nextDataQueueProcess(2);
>>
>> })
>>
>> That's sufficient for today and we'll begin working on an enhanced
>> lexicon expansion capability tomorrow.
>>
>> THAT THE THINKING PROCESS ITSELF AS MACHINATIONS MIGHT BE CONSIDERED
>> LIKE THE COHESION OF A CHESSBOARD TO USE A TWO DIMENSIONAL ANALOGUE AS
>> CONSISTING BY DISCRETE PATTERNS OF OPERATIONS WHICH OCCUR IN SEQUENTIAL
>> ORDER, THUSLY WE WANT TO CONSIDER THE MERIT OF A *THINKING*[] QUEUE AND
>> NUMEROUS *POSSIBILITY* *RULESETS* {} OBJECTS THAT FUNCTION LIKE OUR
>> FORMS {} OBJECTS THAT ONCE HAVING INSTANTIATION WILL THEN PERFORM
>> CERTAIN MICROCOSM WHAT-IF-THEN OPERATIONS AGAINST THE NOUMENON AND ANY
>> CRITERIA OF EVENTS, WATCHES, ONTIC OBLIGANS OR MESHED HIERARCHIES TO
>> CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING TO THEN CONVEY THE RESULTS.
>>
>> TO THAT PROCESS WE MIGHT THEN APPLY PROBABILITY FUNCTIONS AND HOPEFULLY
>> SOMEONE MAY HAVE A JAVASCRIPT LIBRARY BY WHICH WE CAN DEPLOY THOSE
>> CHARACTERISTICS
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> On 23/4/19 2:58 pm, dolf wrote:
>>> We've been so busy over the PASSOVER LONG WEEKEND such that we've had to
>>> take a day's break and hope in the next couple of days to expand our
>>> GRUMBLE prototype to focus on the lexicon expansion capabilities within
>>> our BIBLE QUOTES FORM object {} ...
>>>
>>> This will involve:
>>>
>>> a) implementing a CALLBACK functionality within the DATAQUEUE[]
>>> processing so that there is a singular function() for the process of
>>> lexicon expansion within the Bible narrative.
>>>
>>
>> DATAQUEUE[DATAQUEUE.length] = {
>>
>> dataType: 'VERSE_request',
>> callback: function (id, strongs, ref) {
>>
>> var bubble = document.getElementById(id);
>>
>> biblosExpand.setRules({
>> includeFocusStrongs: true,
>> includeOtherStrongs: false
>> });
>>
>> if (bubble)
>> bubble.innerHTML = [
>> '"', '<font color="blue">', biblosExpand.get (strongs, BIBLOS[ref]),
>> '</font>', '" ',
>> '[<strong>', BIBLOS[ref].book, ' ', BIBLOS[ref].chapter, ':',
>> BIBLOS[ref].verse, '</strong>]'
>> ].join('');
>>
>> },
>> format: "kjv",
>> priority: true,
>> id: [id, '.', obj.strongs, '.', longSections[chapter], '@',
>> STRONGS[obj.strongs].link[chapter][r]].join(''),
>> strongs: obj.strongs,
>> ref: [longSections[chapter], '@',
>> STRONGS[obj.strongs].link[chapter][r]].join(''),
>> section: longSections[chapter],
>> seek: chapter + padnum(ref[0]) + padnum(ref[1])
>> }
>>
>>> b) the lexicon expansion capability within the Bible narrative we
>>> envision will involve the capacity to highlight selective Bible verses
>>> for any designated expansion as either Other OR Focus STRONGS entries.
>>> We are adopting this approach so as to reduce any unnecessary IO
>>> requests and eliminate unnecessary processing of the lexicon expansion.
>>>
>>> However with a single line of code we've today implemented the LEXICON
>>> search option which is no longer reliant upon any exacting ZEN, ROW, COL
>>> construct
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?lexicon:h926>
>>>
>>> switch(true) {
>>> case (typeof(STRONGS[this.params.strongs].data.gematria[this.params.s])
>>> != "undefined") :
>>> obj.mode = 1;
>>> obj.telos = this.params.s;
>>> break;
>>>
>>> case (typeof(STRONGS[this.params.strongs].data.gematria[this.params.e])
>>> != "undefined") :
>>> obj.mode = 0;
>>> obj.telos = this.params.e;
>>> break;
>>>
>>> default:
>>> for (var is in STRONGS[this.params.strongs].data.gematria)
>>> break;
>>> obj.mode = 0;
>>> obj.telos = is;
>>> }
>>>
>>> We anticipate working on the CALLBACK DATAQUEUE[] process tomorrow being
>>> the 24 APRIL 2019.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
Apr 29, 2019, 7:35:55 PM4/29/19
to
SPORTS PEOPLE AS RECENTLY EXAMPLED BY THE TWO CRICKET LOVERS MOCKING
SAME SEX RELATIONSHIP DIGNITY ARE A CLOSED GROUP OF NAZI LOVERS WHOM
HAVE BETRAYED OUR NATION'S FIRST PRINCIPLES AS BOER / ANZAC TRADITION
AND WITH WHOM WE HAVE NO ASSOCIATION NOR ANY INTENTION OF ASSOCIATION.
BOTH THEY AND THEIR FANS BOY (GIRLS ARE TOLERATED) COCKHEADS CAN DIE OFF
FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH IN KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY DID NOT #273 -
REMEMBER THE CAUSE FOR OUR FALLEN SOLDIERS AND ONLY ENGAGED IN PANTOMIME
AS FIDELITY.
In case you hadn't noticed since you have no cogent acumen (shit
excepted) that consequentially to that astute retort of mine, it is all
quiet on the western front...
... you notice now that we are able to give an acute attenuation to our
responses.
In technical terms we are prototyping cohering your responses to the
NOUMENON so that we may determine the nature of your ONTIC premise as
causal / driver for existence and once we are satisfied that we have an
understanding for your fixations we will direct our attention towards
their *NULLIFICATION*
YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who: Every Dalek Extermination"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9HdrWCBsE>
What we want to achieve is an FORM{} object implementation of the
IDENTITY COHESION ASS DISCREET {% #81} AUTONOMY BY PROVISION OF ONTIC {%
SAME SEX RELATIONSHIP DIGNITY ARE A CLOSED GROUP OF NAZI LOVERS WHOM
HAVE BETRAYED OUR NATION'S FIRST PRINCIPLES AS BOER / ANZAC TRADITION
AND WITH WHOM WE HAVE NO ASSOCIATION NOR ANY INTENTION OF ASSOCIATION.
BOTH THEY AND THEIR FANS BOY (GIRLS ARE TOLERATED) COCKHEADS CAN DIE OFF
FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH IN KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY DID NOT #273 -
REMEMBER THE CAUSE FOR OUR FALLEN SOLDIERS AND ONLY ENGAGED IN PANTOMIME
AS FIDELITY.
In case you hadn't noticed since you have no cogent acumen (shit
excepted) that consequentially to that astute retort of mine, it is all
quiet on the western front...
... you notice now that we are able to give an acute attenuation to our
responses.
In technical terms we are prototyping cohering your responses to the
NOUMENON so that we may determine the nature of your ONTIC premise as
causal / driver for existence and once we are satisfied that we have an
understanding for your fixations we will direct our attention towards
their *NULLIFICATION*
YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who: Every Dalek Extermination"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9HdrWCBsE>
What we want to achieve is an FORM{} object implementation of the
#41} NECESSITY DEFINITIONS INTO AGGREGATIONS OF MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS AS
THEN THE DETERMINATION OF ANY ONTOLOGICAL IMPOST UPON ONTIC NECESSITY
BEING TRAVESTY OF THE PERENNIALIST BINOMIAL {A-U-M} STASIS BASIS AS A
THEN THE DETERMINATION OF ANY ONTOLOGICAL IMPOST UPON ONTIC NECESSITY
dolf
Apr 29, 2019, 7:45:41 PM4/29/19
to
I FORGOT TO TELL YOU IN RELATION TO ISRAEL FOLAU'S CONDUCT AND HAVING
CIRCUMSCRIBED THE KJV BIBLE (1611) WITH TRINOMIAL MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS
AND ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE PUBLISHED IN 4 BCE AS DISTINCT TO THE
BINOMIAL STASIS OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE / CHURCH.
OUR INTENTION WITHIN SEVEN DAYS IS TO DENY BY A 20 YEAR PROHIBITION MADE
AGAINST THE *UNITING* *CHURCH* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* HAVING ANY ASSOCIATION
OR USE OF SUCH SUBSTANTIAL DECLARATION OF BELIEF AS AN INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY BEING A HUMAN SAPIENT TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WHICH IS MINE.
THIS GENERATION IS GOING TO DIE OFF WITH CONTEMN AND WE HOPE THAT YOU
RAISE YOUR CHILDREN BETTER...
CIRCUMSCRIBED THE KJV BIBLE (1611) WITH TRINOMIAL MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS
AND ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE PUBLISHED IN 4 BCE AS DISTINCT TO THE
BINOMIAL STASIS OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE / CHURCH.
OUR INTENTION WITHIN SEVEN DAYS IS TO DENY BY A 20 YEAR PROHIBITION MADE
AGAINST THE *UNITING* *CHURCH* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* HAVING ANY ASSOCIATION
OR USE OF SUCH SUBSTANTIAL DECLARATION OF BELIEF AS AN INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY BEING A HUMAN SAPIENT TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WHICH IS MINE.
THIS GENERATION IS GOING TO DIE OFF WITH CONTEMN AND WE HOPE THAT YOU
RAISE YOUR CHILDREN BETTER...
dolf
Apr 29, 2019, 8:16:32 PM4/29/19
to
I FORGOT TO TELL YOU IN RELATION TO ISRAEL FOLAU'S CONDUCT AND HAVING
CIRCUMSCRIBED THE KJV BIBLE (1611) WITH TRINOMIAL MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS
AND ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE PUBLISHED IN 4 BCE AS DISTINCT TO THE
BINOMIAL STASIS OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE / CHURCH.
OUR INTENTION WITHIN SEVEN DAYS IS TO DENY BY A 20 YEAR PROHIBITION MADE
AGAINST THE *UNITING* *CHURCH* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* HAVING ANY ASSOCIATION
OR USE OF SUCH SUBSTANTIAL DECLARATION OF BELIEF AS AN INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY BEING A HUMAN SAPIENT TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WHICH IS MINE.
THIS GENERATION IS GOING TO DIE OFF WITH CONTEMN AND WE HOPE THAT YOU
RAISE YOUR CHILDREN BETTER...
... BY SUCH TIME (GIVEN THE EXAMPLE OF THE 19YO WHITE SUPREMACISTS #231
CIRCUMSCRIBED THE KJV BIBLE (1611) WITH TRINOMIAL MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS
AND ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE PUBLISHED IN 4 BCE AS DISTINCT TO THE
BINOMIAL STASIS OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE / CHURCH.
OUR INTENTION WITHIN SEVEN DAYS IS TO DENY BY A 20 YEAR PROHIBITION MADE
AGAINST THE *UNITING* *CHURCH* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* HAVING ANY ASSOCIATION
OR USE OF SUCH SUBSTANTIAL DECLARATION OF BELIEF AS AN INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY BEING A HUMAN SAPIENT TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WHICH IS MINE.
THIS GENERATION IS GOING TO DIE OFF WITH CONTEMN AND WE HOPE THAT YOU
RAISE YOUR CHILDREN BETTER...
- HITLER YOUTH WHOM ATTACKED A SYNAGOGUE) SUCH CHILDREN OF YOURS WILL
THEN #444 - MOCK YOU TO THE GRAVE...
BWAAA BWAAA BWAAA
SPORTS PEOPLE AS RECENTLY EXAMPLED BY THE TWO CRICKET LOVERS MOCKING
SAME SEX RELATIONSHIP DIGNITY ARE A CLOSED GROUP OF NAZI LOVERS WHOM
HAVE BETRAYED OUR NATION'S FIRST PRINCIPLES AS BOER / ANZAC TRADITION
AND WITH WHOM WE HAVE NO ASSOCIATION NOR ANY INTENTION OF ASSOCIATION.
FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH IN KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY DID NOT #273 -
REMEMBER THE CAUSE FOR OUR FALLEN SOLDIERS AND ONLY ENGAGED IN PANTOMIME
AS FIDELITY.
In case you hadn't noticed since you have no cogent acumen (shit
excepted) that consequentially to that astute retort of mine, it is all
quiet on the western front...
... you notice now that we are able to give an acute attenuation to our
responses.
In technical terms we are prototyping cohering your responses to the
NOUMENON so that we may determine the nature of your ONTIC premise as
causal / driver for existence and once we are satisfied that we have an
understanding for your fixations we will direct our attention towards
their *NULLIFICATION*
YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who: Every Dalek Extermination"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9HdrWCBsE>
What we want to achieve is an FORM{} object implementation of the
IDENTITY COHESION AS DISCREET {% #81} AUTONOMY BY PROVISION OF ONTIC {%
REMEMBER THE CAUSE FOR OUR FALLEN SOLDIERS AND ONLY ENGAGED IN PANTOMIME
AS FIDELITY.
In case you hadn't noticed since you have no cogent acumen (shit
excepted) that consequentially to that astute retort of mine, it is all
quiet on the western front...
... you notice now that we are able to give an acute attenuation to our
responses.
In technical terms we are prototyping cohering your responses to the
NOUMENON so that we may determine the nature of your ONTIC premise as
causal / driver for existence and once we are satisfied that we have an
understanding for your fixations we will direct our attention towards
their *NULLIFICATION*
YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who: Every Dalek Extermination"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9HdrWCBsE>
What we want to achieve is an FORM{} object implementation of the
dolf
Apr 29, 2019, 10:45:25 PM4/29/19
to
YOU DON'T SEEM TO BE A PERSON OF ANY REPUTATION IN THAT YOU HAVE AN
ABNORMAL KNOWLEDGE OF WAR AIRCRAFT BUT CLAIM TO HAVE NO ASSOCIATION TO
ANZAC MEMORIALS AND IN FACT CLAIM CLAIM YOUR FOREBEARS WERE ANARCHISTS
AND AGAINST SOVEREIGNTY OF THE LAW.
THAT IS A BIT LIKE THE RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE MEMBERS (A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY AS EMANATED BINOMIAL STASIS) AS BEING IN REALITY NAZIS
SWEARING AN OATH BY ALMIGHTY GOD TO THEN CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE FIDELITY
TO THE TRINOMIAL BASIS TO BRITISH EMPIRE GOVERNMENT
THAT SUCH OATH IS PERJURY AND LIABLE TO 15 YEARS IMPRISONMENT
WE CONTEND THAT SINCE that since we have completely circumscribe the
KING JAMES BIBLE {
circa 1604 / 1611 CE which back in the day when there was clearly
defined a language / sovereign dynamic and prior to the SECOND VATICAN
COUNCIL was a means to assert SOVEREIGNTY
} by providing lexicon expansion functionality for the biblical
narrative against an ONTIC trinomial epistemological premise published
in 4 BCE as distinct from the binomial stasis of ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
AND to deny the Bible as divine authority by oaths to the contrary is
under common law an breach of the Blasphemy Act 1697
However *BLASPHEMY* is not a criminal offence under Australian federal
law, but the de jure situation varies at state and territory level; it
is currently not enforced in any Australian jurisdiction. The offences
of blasphemy and blasphemous libel in English common law were carried
over to the Australian colonies and "received" into state law following
Federation in 1901. The common-law offences have been abolished totally
in Queensland and Western Australia, when those jurisdictions adopted
criminal codes that superseded the common law. In South Australia,
Victoria, and the Northern Territory the situation is ambiguous, as the
local criminal codes do not mention blasphemy but also did not
specifically abolish the common-law offences.
The Blasphemy Act 1697
The Australian colonies also received the English Blasphemy Act 1697.
This Act remains in force until repealed by legislation; it was repealed
in Queensland in 1899, Western Australia in 1919, Tasmania in 1924, and
the Commonwealth of Australia in 1995. It may still be in force in other
states and territories.
The Blasphemy Act 1697 (9 Will 3 c 35) was an Act of the Parliament of
England. It made it an offence for any person, educated in or having
made profession of the Christian religion, by writing, preaching,
teaching or advised speaking, to deny the Holy Trinity, to claim there
is more than one god, to deny the truth of Christianity and to deny the
Bible as divine authority.
The first offence resulted in being rendered incapable of holding any
office or place of trust. The second offence resulted in being rendered
incapable of bringing any action, of being guardian or executor, or of
taking a legacy or deed of gift, and three years imprisonment without bail.
On 24 May 1966, the Law Commission said that the offence created by this
statute was obsolete and recommended that the whole Act be repealed.[7]
Their recommendation was implemented by section 13(2) of, and Part I of
Schedule 4 to, the Criminal Law Act 1967.[8]
For the effect of this Act on the common law offences, see Blasphemy law
in the United Kingdom - Relationship between the common law and
statutory offences.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_Act_1697>
Relationship between the common law and statutory offences
A person offending under the Blasphemy Act 1697 was also indictable at
common law. In Rex v Carlile,[58] Mr Justice Best said:
So far as the Statute of William containing provisions so inconsistent
with the common law as to operate as a repeal by implication, as far as
it applies to the offence of libel, it seems intended to aid the common
law. It is called "An Act for the More Effectual Suppression of
Blasphemy and Prophaneness." It would ill deserve that name if it
abrogated the common law, inasmuch as, for the first offence, it only
operates against those who are in possession of offices, or in
expectation of them. The rest of the world might with impunity blaspheme
God, and prophane the ordinances and institutions of religion, if the
common law punishment is put an end to. But the Legislature, in passing
this Act, had not the punishment of blasphemy so much in view as the
protecting the Government of the country, by preventing infidels from
getting into places of trust. In the age of toleration in which that
statute passed, neither churchmen or sectarians wished to protect in
their infidelity those who disbelieved the Holy Scriptures. On the
contrary, all agreed, that as the system of morals which regulated their
conduct was built on these Scriptures, none were to be trusted with
offices who shewed they were under no religious responsibility. This Act
is not confined to those who libel religion, but extends to those who,
in the most private intercourse by advised conversation, admit that they
disbelieve the Scriptures. Both the common law and this statute are
necessary; the first to guard the morals of the people; the second for
the immediate protection of the Government.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom#Relationship_between_the_common_law_and_statutory_offences>
On 30/4/19 12:25 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul wrote:> On Tuesday,
April 30, 2019 at 11:17:27 AM UTC+10, GovShill wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:15:43 +1000, dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> THAT IS WHAT YOU GET FOR A HAUGHTY LACK OF CONCERN...
>>
>> What?
>
> More all-caps gobbledigook, I presume.
>
> Mind you, I am sceptical, you see, I gave up HAUGHTY LACK OF CONCERN
for Lent, but without noticing any reduction in the amount of all-caps
gobbledigook, so he may be issuing empty threats.
> No, not that, more the opposite of empty threats.
> What do you call threats that you intend to carry out regardless of
the behaviour you claim to be basing the threats on?
>
On 30/4/19 11:15 am, dolf wrote:
> THAT IS WHAT YOU GET FOR A HAUGHTY LACK OF CONCERN...
> >
> > I'm sure the Uniting Church will be gutted. Bwahahahahahahaha!
>
> NOW BE SURE TO TEACH IT TO YOUR CHILDREN...
ABNORMAL KNOWLEDGE OF WAR AIRCRAFT BUT CLAIM TO HAVE NO ASSOCIATION TO
ANZAC MEMORIALS AND IN FACT CLAIM CLAIM YOUR FOREBEARS WERE ANARCHISTS
AND AGAINST SOVEREIGNTY OF THE LAW.
THAT IS A BIT LIKE THE RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE MEMBERS (A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY AS EMANATED BINOMIAL STASIS) AS BEING IN REALITY NAZIS
SWEARING AN OATH BY ALMIGHTY GOD TO THEN CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE FIDELITY
TO THE TRINOMIAL BASIS TO BRITISH EMPIRE GOVERNMENT
THAT SUCH OATH IS PERJURY AND LIABLE TO 15 YEARS IMPRISONMENT
WE CONTEND THAT SINCE that since we have completely circumscribe the
KING JAMES BIBLE {
circa 1604 / 1611 CE which back in the day when there was clearly
defined a language / sovereign dynamic and prior to the SECOND VATICAN
COUNCIL was a means to assert SOVEREIGNTY
} by providing lexicon expansion functionality for the biblical
narrative against an ONTIC trinomial epistemological premise published
in 4 BCE as distinct from the binomial stasis of ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
AND to deny the Bible as divine authority by oaths to the contrary is
under common law an breach of the Blasphemy Act 1697
However *BLASPHEMY* is not a criminal offence under Australian federal
law, but the de jure situation varies at state and territory level; it
is currently not enforced in any Australian jurisdiction. The offences
of blasphemy and blasphemous libel in English common law were carried
over to the Australian colonies and "received" into state law following
Federation in 1901. The common-law offences have been abolished totally
in Queensland and Western Australia, when those jurisdictions adopted
criminal codes that superseded the common law. In South Australia,
Victoria, and the Northern Territory the situation is ambiguous, as the
local criminal codes do not mention blasphemy but also did not
specifically abolish the common-law offences.
The Blasphemy Act 1697
The Australian colonies also received the English Blasphemy Act 1697.
This Act remains in force until repealed by legislation; it was repealed
in Queensland in 1899, Western Australia in 1919, Tasmania in 1924, and
the Commonwealth of Australia in 1995. It may still be in force in other
states and territories.
The Blasphemy Act 1697 (9 Will 3 c 35) was an Act of the Parliament of
England. It made it an offence for any person, educated in or having
made profession of the Christian religion, by writing, preaching,
teaching or advised speaking, to deny the Holy Trinity, to claim there
is more than one god, to deny the truth of Christianity and to deny the
Bible as divine authority.
The first offence resulted in being rendered incapable of holding any
office or place of trust. The second offence resulted in being rendered
incapable of bringing any action, of being guardian or executor, or of
taking a legacy or deed of gift, and three years imprisonment without bail.
On 24 May 1966, the Law Commission said that the offence created by this
statute was obsolete and recommended that the whole Act be repealed.[7]
Their recommendation was implemented by section 13(2) of, and Part I of
Schedule 4 to, the Criminal Law Act 1967.[8]
For the effect of this Act on the common law offences, see Blasphemy law
in the United Kingdom - Relationship between the common law and
statutory offences.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_Act_1697>
Relationship between the common law and statutory offences
A person offending under the Blasphemy Act 1697 was also indictable at
common law. In Rex v Carlile,[58] Mr Justice Best said:
So far as the Statute of William containing provisions so inconsistent
with the common law as to operate as a repeal by implication, as far as
it applies to the offence of libel, it seems intended to aid the common
law. It is called "An Act for the More Effectual Suppression of
Blasphemy and Prophaneness." It would ill deserve that name if it
abrogated the common law, inasmuch as, for the first offence, it only
operates against those who are in possession of offices, or in
expectation of them. The rest of the world might with impunity blaspheme
God, and prophane the ordinances and institutions of religion, if the
common law punishment is put an end to. But the Legislature, in passing
this Act, had not the punishment of blasphemy so much in view as the
protecting the Government of the country, by preventing infidels from
getting into places of trust. In the age of toleration in which that
statute passed, neither churchmen or sectarians wished to protect in
their infidelity those who disbelieved the Holy Scriptures. On the
contrary, all agreed, that as the system of morals which regulated their
conduct was built on these Scriptures, none were to be trusted with
offices who shewed they were under no religious responsibility. This Act
is not confined to those who libel religion, but extends to those who,
in the most private intercourse by advised conversation, admit that they
disbelieve the Scriptures. Both the common law and this statute are
necessary; the first to guard the morals of the people; the second for
the immediate protection of the Government.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom#Relationship_between_the_common_law_and_statutory_offences>
On 30/4/19 12:25 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul wrote:> On Tuesday,
April 30, 2019 at 11:17:27 AM UTC+10, GovShill wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:15:43 +1000, dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> THAT IS WHAT YOU GET FOR A HAUGHTY LACK OF CONCERN...
>>
>> What?
>
> More all-caps gobbledigook, I presume.
>
> Mind you, I am sceptical, you see, I gave up HAUGHTY LACK OF CONCERN
for Lent, but without noticing any reduction in the amount of all-caps
gobbledigook, so he may be issuing empty threats.
> No, not that, more the opposite of empty threats.
> What do you call threats that you intend to carry out regardless of
the behaviour you claim to be basing the threats on?
>
On 30/4/19 11:15 am, dolf wrote:
> THAT IS WHAT YOU GET FOR A HAUGHTY LACK OF CONCERN...
>
> On 30/4/19 10:17 am, dolf wrote:
>> I FORGOT TO TELL YOU IN RELATION TO ISRAEL FOLAU'S CONDUCT AND HAVING
>> CIRCUMSCRIBED THE KJV BIBLE (1611) WITH TRINOMIAL MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS
>> AND ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE PUBLISHED IN 4 BCE AS DISTINCT TO
>> THE BINOMIAL STASIS OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE / CHURCH.
>>
>> OUR INTENTION WITHIN SEVEN DAYS IS TO DENY BY A 20 YEAR PROHIBITION
>> MADE AGAINST THE *UNITING* *CHURCH* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* HAVING ANY
>> ASSOCIATION OR USE OF SUCH SUBSTANTIAL DECLARATION OF BELIEF AS AN
>> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BEING A HUMAN SAPIENT TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
>> WHICH IS MINE.
>>
>> THIS GENERATION IS GOING TO DIE OFF WITH CONTEMN AND WE HOPE THAT YOU
>> RAISE YOUR CHILDREN BETTER...
>>
>> ... BY SUCH TIME (GIVEN THE EXAMPLE OF THE 19YO WHITE SUPREMACISTS
>> #231 - HITLER YOUTH WHOM ATTACKED A SYNAGOGUE) SUCH CHILDREN OF YOURS
>> WILL THEN #444 - MOCK YOU TO THE GRAVE...
>>
>> BWAAA BWAAA BWAAA
>>
>
> On 30/4/19 10:20 am, Government Shill #2 wrote:> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019
> On 30/4/19 10:17 am, dolf wrote:
>> I FORGOT TO TELL YOU IN RELATION TO ISRAEL FOLAU'S CONDUCT AND HAVING
>> CIRCUMSCRIBED THE KJV BIBLE (1611) WITH TRINOMIAL MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS
>> AND ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE PUBLISHED IN 4 BCE AS DISTINCT TO
>> THE BINOMIAL STASIS OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE / CHURCH.
>>
>> OUR INTENTION WITHIN SEVEN DAYS IS TO DENY BY A 20 YEAR PROHIBITION
>> MADE AGAINST THE *UNITING* *CHURCH* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* HAVING ANY
>> ASSOCIATION OR USE OF SUCH SUBSTANTIAL DECLARATION OF BELIEF AS AN
>> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BEING A HUMAN SAPIENT TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
>> WHICH IS MINE.
>>
>> THIS GENERATION IS GOING TO DIE OFF WITH CONTEMN AND WE HOPE THAT YOU
>> RAISE YOUR CHILDREN BETTER...
>>
>> ... BY SUCH TIME (GIVEN THE EXAMPLE OF THE 19YO WHITE SUPREMACISTS
>> #231 - HITLER YOUTH WHOM ATTACKED A SYNAGOGUE) SUCH CHILDREN OF YOURS
>> WILL THEN #444 - MOCK YOU TO THE GRAVE...
>>
>> BWAAA BWAAA BWAAA
>>
>
> 10:17:02 +1000, dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> OUR INTENTION WITHIN SEVEN DAYS IS TO DENY BY A 20 YEAR PROHIBITION
> MADE
> >> AGAINST THE *UNITING* *CHURCH* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* HAVING ANY ASSOCIATION
> >> OR USE OF SUCH SUBSTANTIAL DECLARATION OF BELIEF AS AN INTELLECTUAL
> >> PROPERTY BEING A HUMAN SAPIENT TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WHICH IS MINE.
> >
> > Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!
> >
> >> OUR INTENTION WITHIN SEVEN DAYS IS TO DENY BY A 20 YEAR PROHIBITION
> MADE
> >> AGAINST THE *UNITING* *CHURCH* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* HAVING ANY ASSOCIATION
> >> OR USE OF SUCH SUBSTANTIAL DECLARATION OF BELIEF AS AN INTELLECTUAL
> >> PROPERTY BEING A HUMAN SAPIENT TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WHICH IS MINE.
> >
> >
> > I'm sure the Uniting Church will be gutted. Bwahahahahahahaha!
>
> NOW BE SURE TO TEACH IT TO YOUR CHILDREN...
0 new messages