Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Whining Leftist Hand-wringing Over Guns Continues
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Spartan613
Feb 1, 2012, 4:36:07 AM2/1/12
to
"keithr" <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:4f27c4bd$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> On 31/01/2012 12:15 PM, max headroom wrote:
>> "keithr"<kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:4f27345f$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>>> On 31/01/2012 4:07 AM, Jim Yanik wrote:
>>
>>>> FACT is,gun ownership AND carriage is a CIVIL RIGHT,one of the most
>>>> important civil rights.
>>>> What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you people understand?
>>
>>> At the risk of starting the usual shit fight, why is it so important to
>>> be able to carry a gun?
>>
>> Ask a cop why he carries one.
>>
>>
> Around here they do because they are obliged to as part of the uniform.
Now THAT'S new and original. And the dumbest thing I've seen on Usenet this
year. (is your best yet to come?).
I'm very familiar with cops and guns, and NOWHERE in the use of force orders
and legislation does it say that a cop will carry a gun because it completes
the uniform.
> Most cops I know have never drawn theirs.
You don't have to draw a pistol from its holster to "use" it.
If you had half a clue, you'd have figured that out.
Where's that brain you were crowing about?
--
"There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not
want merely because you think it would be good for him".
Robert A. Heinlein.
news:4f27c4bd$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> On 31/01/2012 12:15 PM, max headroom wrote:
>> "keithr"<kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:4f27345f$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>>> On 31/01/2012 4:07 AM, Jim Yanik wrote:
>>
>>>> FACT is,gun ownership AND carriage is a CIVIL RIGHT,one of the most
>>>> important civil rights.
>>>> What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you people understand?
>>
>>> At the risk of starting the usual shit fight, why is it so important to
>>> be able to carry a gun?
>>
>> Ask a cop why he carries one.
>>
>>
> Around here they do because they are obliged to as part of the uniform.
Now THAT'S new and original. And the dumbest thing I've seen on Usenet this
year. (is your best yet to come?).
I'm very familiar with cops and guns, and NOWHERE in the use of force orders
and legislation does it say that a cop will carry a gun because it completes
the uniform.
> Most cops I know have never drawn theirs.
You don't have to draw a pistol from its holster to "use" it.
If you had half a clue, you'd have figured that out.
Where's that brain you were crowing about?
--
"There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not
want merely because you think it would be good for him".
Robert A. Heinlein.
keithr
Feb 1, 2012, 6:01:34 AM2/1/12
to
On 1/02/2012 8:36 PM, Spartan613 wrote:
> "keithr" <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
> news:4f27c4bd$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>> On 31/01/2012 12:15 PM, max headroom wrote:
>>> "keithr"<kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:4f27345f$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>>>> On 31/01/2012 4:07 AM, Jim Yanik wrote:
>>>
>>>>> FACT is,gun ownership AND carriage is a CIVIL RIGHT,one of the most
>>>>> important civil rights.
>>>>> What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you people understand?
>>>
>>>> At the risk of starting the usual shit fight, why is it so important
>>>> to be able to carry a gun?
>>>
>>> Ask a cop why he carries one.
>>>
>>>
>> Around here they do because they are obliged to as part of the uniform.
>
> Now THAT'S new and original. And the dumbest thing I've seen on Usenet
> this year. (is your best yet to come?).
>
> I'm very familiar with cops and guns, and NOWHERE in the use of force
> orders and legislation does it say that a cop will carry a gun because
> it completes the uniform.
>
>> Most cops I know have never drawn theirs.
>
> You don't have to draw a pistol from its holster to "use" it.
>
> If you had half a clue, you'd have figured that out.
>
> Where's that brain you were crowing about?
>
Laughing at you you silly old fool. Hows the design for the naval gyro
> "keithr" <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
> news:4f27c4bd$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>> On 31/01/2012 12:15 PM, max headroom wrote:
>>> "keithr"<kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:4f27345f$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>>>> On 31/01/2012 4:07 AM, Jim Yanik wrote:
>>>
>>>>> FACT is,gun ownership AND carriage is a CIVIL RIGHT,one of the most
>>>>> important civil rights.
>>>>> What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you people understand?
>>>
>>>> At the risk of starting the usual shit fight, why is it so important
>>>> to be able to carry a gun?
>>>
>>> Ask a cop why he carries one.
>>>
>>>
>> Around here they do because they are obliged to as part of the uniform.
>
> Now THAT'S new and original. And the dumbest thing I've seen on Usenet
> this year. (is your best yet to come?).
>
> I'm very familiar with cops and guns, and NOWHERE in the use of force
> orders and legislation does it say that a cop will carry a gun because
> it completes the uniform.
>
>> Most cops I know have never drawn theirs.
>
> You don't have to draw a pistol from its holster to "use" it.
>
> If you had half a clue, you'd have figured that out.
>
> Where's that brain you were crowing about?
>
stabilised rifle coming along?
Spartan613
Feb 2, 2012, 5:43:37 AM2/2/12
to
"keithr" <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:4f291b82$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
you realise you've been done like a dinner.
You lose.
Dickhead.
keithr
Feb 5, 2012, 9:02:47 PM2/5/12
to
Spartan613
Feb 7, 2012, 5:05:03 AM2/7/12
to
"keithr" <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:4f2f34be$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Dickhead.
Got any proof to back up your claim that cops carry guns because it
completes their uniform?
keithr
Feb 7, 2012, 5:23:02 AM2/7/12
to
>and lots of people know you're a dickhead.
Got any proof to back up your claim
> Dickhead.
>
> Got any proof to back up your claim that cops carry guns because it
> completes their uniform?
Nope have you any proof that they don't?
> Dickhead.
>
> Got any proof to back up your claim that cops carry guns because it
> completes their uniform?
Spartan613
Feb 8, 2012, 4:14:04 AM2/8/12
to
"keithr" <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:4f30fb7a$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
No where in any of the various police use of force documents does it say the
reason for carrying a firearms is because it looks good, or completes the
uniform.
Two birds with one stone.
You've been proven wrong, and that you're a dickhead.
I rest my case.
keithr
Feb 9, 2012, 6:44:37 AM2/9/12
to
> Two birds with one stone.
>
> You've been proven wrong, and that you're a dickhead.
>
> I rest my case.
some semblance of dignity.
Spartan613
Feb 10, 2012, 6:28:57 PM2/10/12
to
"keithr" <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:4f33b195$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
uniform look cool"
In any event, cop this fuckwit.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:BPjNSiUBmK0J:www.afp.gov.au/about-the-afp/~/media/afp/ips-foi-documents/ips/publication-list/PC00003%2520-%2520Use%2520of%2520Force%2520CO3%252020MAY11.ashx+afp+commissioner%27s+orders+3&hl=en&gl=au&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjtPJSKSoXfM9GVu0ti0uv2I8qlKyVetcnG6K3Fj5qfMzW3eDcyvMCbdpUMCIrepmdb0kWCkWTu2xM7p-EUVQ2T0TvkJahCfQoQY3fBCAQm7BNDmTHgcbyBtxBUQNMmi2ud5Sql&sig=AHIEtbRbi7Htm8qEbSAWR4M5xW_HdyfcRw
Section 2.1, Para 4.
You shitbag, loser.
You're easier to play than a pair of bongos.
Now fuck off before I slap you around some more.
>
>> Two birds with one stone.
>>
>> You've been proven wrong, and that you're a dickhead.
>>
>> I rest my case.
>
> If that is all you have got, you better had do so and get out now with
> some semblance of dignity.
0 new messages