Re: — UPDATE: GRUMBLE prototype progress update 26 August 2021: TOWARDS REASON AND ASSAYING MEMEBRAIN PRINCIPLES AS CRITERIA

0 views
Skip to first unread message

dolf

unread,
Aug 25, 2021, 9:43:40 PMAug 25
to
YOUTUBE: "Days of Elijah (No God Like Jehovah)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUIa674GGCo>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjZ_IlP9c5A>

Cortese (2016, p 27) states that the word ‘technic’ is used in the sense
of encompassing both technology and technique. It derives from the
ancient Greek notion of ‘techne’, which was a category that made no
distinction between technology and technique, or technology and methodology.

Given that we on 8 OCTOBER 2017 first publicly divulged our discovery of
Yang HSIUNG's (4 BCE) POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES being
the basis for an ONTIC epistemological premise, our goal then is to
briefly convey what is our work in progress into deploying the
methodology as the technological basis to Queen Victoria's Letters
Patent which whilst provisioning a historical continuity of mind, is
nevertheless an artefact from the industrial revolution era.

#1 #2 #3 = #6 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION / *POWERS* (#6 - FORM OF NATURE
(#3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE)) / EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE &
DEFINITE MEANING)

#8 #9 #4 = #21 - PRINCIPLE OF LIABILITY (#9 - AUTONOMY) / APODIDOMI:
G591 (@181 - RESERVE)

#7 #6 #5 = #18 - FORM OF NATURE {QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated
29 OCTOBER 1900} / POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE)

SECTION VI - QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT: And whereas by 'The
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900,' it is amongst other
things enacted, that we may authorise the Governor General to APPOINT
any person or persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or
Deputies within any part of Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to
exercise, during the pleasure of the Governor General such *POWERS*, and
FUNCTIONS of the said Governor General as he thinks fit to assign to
such Deputy or Deputies, subject to any LIMITATIONS and directions as
aforesaid, to APPOINT any person or persons, jointly or severally. To be
his Deputy or Deputies within any part of Our said Commonwealth of
Australia, and in that capacity to exercise, during his pleasure, such
of his *POWERS* and FUNCTIONS, as he may deem it necessary or expedient
to assign to him or them: Provided always, that the APPOINTMENT of such
a Deputy or Deputies shall not affect the exercise by the Governor
General himself of any *POWER* or FUNCTION.

CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 = {
1: {idea: [265 - *THE* *KEY*, 266], page: [15, 15]},
2: {idea: [267, 268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, 269 - *CONCEPT*
*OF* *CONTRADICTION* {#1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON} + #49
{7x7: #175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2 = #150}, 272, 273, 274 -
*MISTRUST* *OF* *DOGMATISM*], page: [16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21]},
3: {idea: [270 - *AUSTRALIA* *DAY*], page: [22]},
6: {}, // <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 -
NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE})
9: {}, // <-- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
18: {IDEA: [298], PAGE: [50]}, // <-- QUEEN VICTORIA'S APO: G575 (@150
- ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 -
PRESENTS)
27: {idea: [311], page: [62]}, // #27 - *DUTIES* (*SHIH*)
54: {idea: [348], page: [99]} // #54 - UNITY
}

TETRAD TRINOMIAL DEFINITION OF NUMBER:

+ 0, 27, 54
+ 0, 9, 18
+ 0, 3, 6
+ 1, 2, 3

#298 as [#40, #8, #100, #100, #10, #600] = châqaq (H2710): {UMBRA: #11
as #208 % #41 = #3} 1) to cut out, decree, inscribe, set, engrave,
portray, govern; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to cut in; 1a2) to cut in or on, cut
upon, engrave, inscribe; 1a3) to trace, mark out; 1a4) *TO* *ENGRAVE*,
*INSCRIBE* (*OF* *A* *LAW*); 1b) (Poel); 1b1) *TO* *INSCRIBE*, *ENACT*,
*DECREE*; 1b2) *ONE* *WHO* *DECREES*, *LAWGIVER* (*PARTICIPLE*); 1c)
(Pual) something decreed, the law (participle); 1d) (Hophal) to be
inscribed;

The Greek notion of techné reifies (Cortese: 2016, p 13) the
co-constitutive relationship humans have with their technology because
it demonstrates that a clean and clear ontological distinction between
technology and technique, tool and thought, or device and mind is
neither necessary nor more appropriate than avoiding such a distinction.

And in this regard of GNOSIS EX MACHINA as the avoidance of ontological
distinctions between the nature and capacity of mind and tool or device
as machine (Greek: μηχᾰνή (mēkhanḗ)) we'll convey something of our
CONCEPT FOR IDEA TRANSMUTATION (AUGMENTATION / AMELIORATION) FOR ANY #81
- UNIVERSE OF DISCOURSE BEING #54 - UNITY OF APPERCEPTION as the
metalogic SCENARIO which demonstrates our case study as "fire evacuee"
--> "something terrible happened" change dynamic to the static
autonomous delimiter being a real world example diligently obtained from
an Internet based testimony during the Gippsland East bush fires last of
DECEMBER 2019.

WHEREIN WE CONSIDERED THAT WE MIGHT VIEW A *CATASTROPHIC* *EVENT* AS
KNOWN SCENARIO IN TERMS OF A *DISJUNCTIVE* PROPOSITION:

YANG SUPERNAL (NURTURE)
A BUSH FIRE EVENT

(?)
|

(?) <-- PROBLEM RESOLUTION --> (?)

|
(?)

YIN EGO (NATURE)
OUR REALITY

In this simple neural linguistic case study we were able to redact the
entire narrative which was voluntarily made into its various ONTIC and
metalogic components:

The GRAPPLE [#41, #57, #1, #9, #10, #27, #45, #46, #51] PROTOTYPE
conveying the ONTIC premise of an impending devastation by a #140 - RED
GLOW encroaching within the distance...

[TO PRESERVE,
GUARD FROM
DANGERS]

#41 #57 #1
#46 #51 #9
#45 #27 #10

MORPHOLOGICAL CONDITION ([#79, #9, #70, #32]) -----> [THEN SOMETHING
TERRIBLE HAPPENED. SO WHERE CAN WE ESCAPE TO NOW?]

#9 #41 #57
#45 #46 #1
#32 #27 #10 = #313 - DEVASTATED / #268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*

[EVERYTHING WILL BE
DEVASTATED]

The GRAPPLE [#9, #41, #57, #1, #10, #27, #32, #45, #46] PROTOTYPE
conveying that #281 - *EVERYTHING* will be reduced to ashes…

And we concluded that whilst utilitarianism has been criticised for
focusing on the consequences rather than the motive or intrinsic nature
of an action, by the consideration that actions are right if they are
useful or for the benefit of a majority. That the solution to this is
perhaps given by YANG HSIUNG's approach to his less or more structure:

#VIRTUE,
#TOOLS,
#POSITION,
#TIME

It might then be cause for a specialist field of BAYESIAN THEORY which
we'll term UTILITARIAN PROBABILITY that deals expressly with the
essentiality of the ONTIC premise as the impetus to any "motive or
intrinsic nature of an action".

As our introductory example being our conception of a PROPOSITIONAL
DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE we considered a STATIC
LIMITED {ie. #9} TERM of #51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG) which we had nuanced
to accommodate the need for COMPLIANCE in being a concern for #27 - DUTY
purveying some beneficial ACTION related to CALAMITY.

Thusly we return again further prudent opinion from Francesco Cortese ...

- dolf

On 25/8/21 18:25, dolf wrote:
> ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES:
>
> [150, 104, 175, 181, 228, 86, 102, 171]
>
> [150, {@1: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#69); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
> CH'IUNG (#69)}
> 104, {@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#80); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#92)}
> 175, {@3: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 13 -
> INCREASE: TSENG (#105)}
> 181, {@4: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#147); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
> (#124)}
> 228, {@5: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22});
> Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#190)}
> 86, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#208); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
> (#195)}
> 102, {@7: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#262); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#216)}
> 171] {@8: Sup: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#325); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#225)}
>
> GRUMBLE (#325 - TOTAL MAGIC SUM (#65) FOR 5x5 / *ROOT*, #225 - *QUEEN*)@[69, 69,
> 11, 23, 24, 13, 43, 19, 28, 66, 33, 5, 54, 21, 63, 9]
>
> GRUNTLE (#816 - *ROOT*, #550 - *SOVEREIGN* *DOMINION*)@[69, 69, 57, 69,
> 68, 11, 10, 23, 34, 24, 47, 13, 9, 43, 28, 19, 56, 28, 41, 66, 74, 33,
> 79, 5, 52, 54, 73, 21, 55, 63, 64, 9]
>
> #325 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] =
> paradídōmi (G3860): {UMBRA: #1050 % #41 = #25} 1) to give into the hands
> (of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 2a) to deliver
> to one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up
> one to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented,
> put to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause
> one to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 2d) to
> commit, to commend; 2e) to deliver verbally; 2e1) commands, rites; 2e2)
> to deliver by narrating, to report; 2f) to permit allow; 2f1) when the
> fruit will allow that is when its ripeness permits; 2f2) gives itself
> up, presents itself;
>

#168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE as [#100, #10, #7, #1, #50] /
#325 as [#100, #10, #7, #8, #200] = rhíza (G4491): {UMBRA: #118 % #41 =
#36} 1) a *ROOT*; 2) that which like a root springs from a root, a
sprout, shoot; 3) metaph. offspring, progeny;

>     #434 as [#7, #8, #200, #5, #200, #9, #5] /
> #325 as [#5, #7, #8, #300, #5] = záō (G2198): {UMBRA: #808 % #41 = #29}
> 1) to live, breathe, be among the living (not lifeless, not dead); 2) to
> enjoy real life; 2a) to have true life and worthy of the name; 2b)
> active, blessed, endless in the kingdom of God; 3) to live i.e. pass
> life, in the manner of the living and acting; 3a) of mortals or
> character; 4) living water, having vital power in itself and exerting
> the same upon the soul; 5) metaph. to be in full vigour; 5a) to be
> fresh, strong, efficient,; 5b) as adj. active, powerful, efficacious;
>
> #225 as [#5, #3, #2, #10, #200, #5] = gᵉbîyrâh (H1377): {UMBRA: #220 %
> #41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
>
> #816 as [#300, #200, #300, #10, #6] / [#6, #300, #200, #300, #10] =
> sheresh (H8328): {UMBRA: #800 % #41 = #21} 1) root; 1a) root (literal);
> 1b) root (of people involving firmness or permanence) (fig); 1c) root,
> bottom (as lowest stratum) (fig);
>
> #816 as [#10, #300, #200, #300, #6] = shârash (H8327): {UMBRA: #800 %
> #41 = #21} 1) to uproot, take root, deal with the roots; 1a) (Piel) to
> root up, root out; 1b) (Pual) to be rooted up or out (of produce); 1c)
> (Poel) to take root; 1d) (Poal) to take root; 1e) (Hiphil) to take root,
> cause to take root;
>
> #550 as [#40, #40, #30, #20, #400, #500] = mamlâkâh (H4467): {UMBRA:
> #135 % #41 = #12} 1) kingdom, dominion, reign, sovereignty; 1a) kingdom,
> realm; 1b) sovereignty, dominion; 1c) reign;
>

Thusly we might reasonably conclude that the impetus for the Apostle
Paul's (Hebrew or Hebrews / Pharisee) discourse as the Epistle to the
Romans is to preserve the Jewish claim to Sovereignty: “BOAST NOT
AGAINST THE BRANCHES. BUT IF THOU BOAST, THOU BEAREST NOT THE ROOT-rhíza
(G4491), BUT THE ROOT-rhíza (G4491) THEE.

YOUTUBE: "Days of Elijah (No God Like Jehovah)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUIa674GGCo>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjZ_IlP9c5A>

THOU WILT SAY THEN, THE BRANCHES WERE BROKEN OFF, THAT I MIGHT BE
GRAFFED IN.

WELL; BECAUSE OF UNBELIEF THEY WERE BROKEN OFF, AND THOU STANDEST BY
FAITH. BE NOT HIGHMINDED, BUT FEAR:

FOR IF GOD SPARED NOT THE NATURAL BRANCHES, TAKE HEED LEST HE ALSO SPARE
NOT THEE.

BEHOLD THEREFORE THE GOODNESS AND SEVERITY OF GOD: ON THEM WHICH FELL,
SEVERITY; BUT TOWARD THEE, GOODNESS, IF THOU CONTINUE IN HIS GOODNESS:
OTHERWISE THOU ALSO SHALT BE CUT OFF.” [Romans 11:18-22 (KJV)]

> On 25/8/21 14:52, dolf wrote:
>> Tomorrow's discourse will be on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078
>> which we understand with respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as
>> being an attribute of anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[t])
>>
>> "Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think
>> that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by
>> art-G5078 and man's device." [Acts 17:29]
>>
>> ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
>>
>> #1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
>> #2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
>> #3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN
>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
>> #4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
>> #5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
>> LEXICON ENTRIES
>>
>> #6) APOGRÁPHŌ: G583 (@86 - ACCORDING TO LAW)
>> #7) ARÉTĒ: G703 (@102 - ETHICAL / MORAL ACTION as @113 - PRINCIPLE OF
>> EMANATION BY #45 - METHODOLOGY + #68 - RIGHTS CONFORMITY)
>> #8) TÉCHNĒ: G5078 (@171 - ETHOS OF TECHNIC SELF-DETERMINATION)
>>
>>      #VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
>>      #TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
>>      #POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
>>      #TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
>>      #CANON: #171
>>
>> TOTAL ONTIC CONCEPT:
>>
>> @150 + @104 + #175 + @181 + @228 = #838
>>
>> #838 + @86 + @102 + @171 = #1197 as [#5, #100, #100, #10, #7, #800,
>> #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = rhizóō (G4492): {UMBRA: #987 % #41 = #3} 1)
>> to cause to strike root, to strengthen with roots, to render firm, to
>> fix, establish, cause a person or a thing to be thoroughly grounded;
>>
>> "Rooted-G4492 and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye
>> have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving.
>>
>> Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit,
>> after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world (ie.
>> STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS) and not after Christ.
>>
>> For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead (cf: #592 is the
>> RIGHTS noumenon extent) bodily." [Colossians 2:7-9]
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> On 25/8/21 09:12, dolf wrote:
>>>
>>> Our goal is not to critique Cortese's paper on an ontology of self
>>> determination having a timeless human drive towards human enhancement
>>> technology (*HET*) but rather to proffer an accommodation of ideas
>>> expressed therein and as syncretism progress my own semantics of
>>> experience
>>> as informal research into GNOSIS EX MACHINA.
>>>
>>> We note that QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT has both an ONTIC
>>> technological basis (ie. the ONTIC intersection of #205 (#124 + #81) and
>>> #164) associated with FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS to #492-voluntary
>>> freewill
>>> that is not only a doorway to the legislative framework which is in
>>> and of
>>> itself an immense opportunity, namely:
>>>
>>> a) A neural linguistic capability which by reverse transcriptase as
>>> TETRAD
>>> is able to define rules based quantum;
>>>
>>> b) the FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS to #492-voluntary freewill relative to
>>> the ontology of @1 - SELF, provides a paradigm method for self
>>> modulation;
>>>
>>> c) The noumenon is an ontic / sapient framework:
>>>
>>> @123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY
>>> @164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
>>> @205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE
>>>
>>> d) QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT redacted to an ONTIC technological
>>> paradigm is then the basis for a sapient / knowledge based economy where
>>> both the INTERNET OF THINGS and HUMAN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGY can
>>> function
>>> as a franchised autonomy (#902 - AUTOS + #68 {#33, #17, #18} - RIGHTS =
>>> #970 - NOMOS) having a "distinct modality of self-determination"
>>>
>>> Whereby we envision that a sapient / knowledge based economy will enable
>>> sovereign states to leverage taxation / transaction revenue on a
>>> proportional basis which is derived from a global pool of usage.
>>>
>>> - dolf
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 24/8/21 20:47, dolf wrote:
>>>>> JUST AN EXPANSION OF #124 - TIMES WITHIN OUR COMMENTARY...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cortese (2016, p 3) further states that the dichotomy of
>>>>> determinism as
>>>>> a false free-will dilemma was engendered for millennia and established
>>>>> within the western philosophical as perennial tradition.
>>>>>
>>>>> And this we have explained is probably due to the basis of that
>>>>> dogmatism as perennial school of thinking having a foundational
>>>>> reliance
>>>>> upon the STOICHEION elements as #45 - METHODOLOGY of RELIGIONISTS and
>>>>> which is dogmatically (ie. whether #1827 - Eucharist or Hajj as
>>>>> purposed
>>>>> life) and existentially #5 - centred upon the #9 - PRINCIPLE OF
>>>>> AUTONOMY
>>>>> as an institutional basis for its economy, in that it thereby
>>>>> conveys an
>>>>> extrusion of being having an inherent antagonism (ie. WEAK-asthenḗs
>>>>> (G772) and BEGGARLY-ptōchós (G4434) ELEMENTS-stoicheîon (G4747)):
>>>>>
>>>>> ENHANCER OR SUBJUGATOR?
>>>>>
>>>>> #1  #2  #3
>>>>> #8 #9  #4
>>>>> #7 #6  #5
>>>>>
>>>>>        v's
>>>>>
>>>>> #2  #9  #4
>>>>> #7  #5  #3
>>>>> #6  #1  #8
>>>>>
>>>>> "BUT NOW, AFTER THAT YE HAVE KNOWN GOD, OR RATHER ARE KNOWN OF GOD,
>>>>> HOW
>>>>> TURN YE AGAIN TO THE WEAK-asthenḗs (G772) AND BEGGARLY-ptōchós (G4434)
>>>>> ELEMENTS-stoicheîon (G4747), WHEREUNTO YE DESIRE AGAIN TO BE IN
>>>>> BONDAGE?
>>>>>
>>>>> #1 + #21 + #41 + #61 = #124
>>>>>
>>>>> #124 as [#70, #4, #50] = ʻiddân (H5732): {UMBRA: #124 % #41 = #1} 1)
>>>>> time; 1a) time (of duration); 1b) year;
>>>>>
>>>>>      #200 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
>>>>> [#6, #30, #40, #70, #4, #10, #600] / [#30, #40, #6, #70, #4, #10,
>>>>> #600] /
>>>>> #124 as [#40, #70, #4, #10] = môwʻêd (H4150): {UMBRA: #120 % #41 =
>>>>> #38}
>>>>> 1) appointed place, appointed time, meeting; 1a) appointed time; 1a1)
>>>>> appointed time (general); 1a2) sacred season, set feast, appointed
>>>>> season; 1b) appointed meeting; 1c) appointed place; 1d) appointed sign
>>>>> or signal; 1e) tent of meeting;
>>>>>
>>>>> #124 as [#70, #30, #10, #3, #1, #10] = olígos (G3641): {UMBRA: #383 %
>>>>> #41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude,
>>>>> quantity, or
>>>>> size; 1b) of time: short; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;
>>>>>
>>>>>      #59 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
>>>>> [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
>>>>> #124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
>>>>> #24} 1) *to* *will*, *have* *in* *mind*, *intend*; 1a) to be
>>>>> resolved or
>>>>> determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
>>>>> like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have
>>>>> pleasure;
>>>>>
>>>>> YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.
>>>>>
>>>>> #71  #1 #11
>>>>> #61 #81 #21
>>>>> #51 #41 #31
>>>>>
>>>>> #1 - 21 DECEMBER
>>>>> #21 - 21 MARCH
>>>>> #41 - 21 JUNE
>>>>> #61 - 23 SEPTEMBER
>>>>>
>>>>> #401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
>>>>> kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
>>>>> of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
>>>>> definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the
>>>>> decisive
>>>>> epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right
>>>>> time;
>>>>> 2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of
>>>>> the
>>>>> times, the things and events of time;
>>>>>
>>>>> I AM AFRAID OF YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
>>>>> [Galatians 4:9-11]
>>>>>
>>>>> Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and
>>>>> Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
>>>>> causality pertaining to the role of emergence in the creation of
>>>>> consciousness has that been debated for over a century, but it remains
>>>>> unresolved. In particular there is controversy over the claim that a
>>>>> “strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain
>>>>> phenomenal
>>>>> consciousness.
>>>>>
>>>>> In making a nomenclature consideration of #45 - METHODOLOGY the
>>>>> #CENTRE
>>>>> of value PROPOSITION is that any DELIMITER is relative to the
>>>>> AUTONOMOUS
>>>>> PRINCIPLE, thereby as a METATHEORY OF LOGIC is a stratum as
>>>>> dialectic of
>>>>> meta-descriptor prototypes which always precedes it.
>>>>>
>>>>> #1
>>>>> #2
>>>>> #3
>>>>> #4
>>>>> #5
>>>>> #6
>>>>> #7
>>>>> #8
>>>>> #9 - PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
>>>>>
>>>>> Whereas the SAPIENT OPINION FROM AN EXPERT and those of the IGNORANT
>>>>> POSTULATIONS OF STUPIDITY might both direct themselves to the same
>>>>> PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER, the dialectic of meta-descriptor
>>>>> prototypes can
>>>>> yield entirely different results which may be vital or may not satisfy
>>>>> our contingent need for a STATIC conception with an inclusion of any
>>>>> ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE with deference to the resultant CATEGORY
>>>>> OF UNDERSTANDING such as for example #432 - DEVOID OF TRUTH OR USELESS
>>>>> which is then associated to our STATIC conception.
>>>>>
>>>>> In case you thought that our postulation on whether a noumenon based
>>>>> "quantum mechanical trigger" is a self-modulating characteristic to
>>>>> "an
>>>>> ontology of self-determination" was spurious opportunism and specious
>>>>> rumination, we then @ 0810 hours the following day made a
>>>>> consideration
>>>>> of error and obtained the following temporal heuristic:
>>>>>
>>>>> @ 0810 HOURS ON 24 AUGUST 2021 GRAPPLE: [#29, #63, #80, #81, #65, #1,
>>>>> #2, #11, #53] PROTOTYPE
>>>>>
>>>>> #THREE:    #181    as #19 - FOLLOWING (TS'UNG)
>>>>>
>>>>> #FOUR:      #204    as #42 - GOING TO MEET (YING)
>>>>>
>>>>> #FIVE:        #385    as #61 - EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)
>>>>>
>>>>>      #200 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
>>>>> [#6, #10, #80, #100, #4] / [#80, #100, #6, #4, #10] /
>>>>>      #210 as [#80, #100, #4, #6, #500] /
>>>>> #254 as [#80, #100, #4, #10, #20, #600] / [#10, #80, #100, #4, #50,
>>>>> #10]
>>>>> = pâqad (H6485): {UMBRA: #184 % #41 = #20} 1) to attend to, muster,
>>>>> number, reckon, visit, punish, appoint, look after, care for; 1a)
>>>>> (Qal);
>>>>> 1a1) to pay attention to, observe; 1a2) to attend to; 1a3) to seek,
>>>>> look
>>>>> about for; 1a4) *TO* *SEEK* *IN* *VAIN*, *NEED*, *MISS*, *LACK*;
>>>>> 1a5) to
>>>>> visit; 1a6) to visit upon, punish; 1a7) to pass in review, muster,
>>>>> number; 1a8) to appoint, assign, lay upon as a charge, deposit; 1b)
>>>>> (Niphal); 1b1) to be sought, be needed, be missed, be lacking; 1b2) to
>>>>> be visited; 1b3) to be visited upon; 1b4) to be appointed; 1b5) to be
>>>>> watched over; 1c) (Piel) to muster, call up; 1d) (Pual) *TO* *BE*
>>>>> *PASSED* *IN* *REVIEW*, *BE* *CAUSED* *TO* *MISS*, *BE* *CALLED*, *BE*
>>>>> *CALLED* *TO* *ACCOUNT*; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to set over, make
>>>>> overseer,
>>>>> appoint an overseer; 1e2) to commit, entrust, commit for care,
>>>>> deposit;
>>>>> 1f) (Hophal); 1f1) to be visited; 1f2) to be deposited; 1f3) to be
>>>>> made
>>>>> overseer, be entrusted; 1g) (Hithpael) numbered; 1h) (Hothpael)
>>>>> numbered; 2) musterings, expenses;
>>>>>
>>>>> However we must offer a caveat here and that is, our informal research
>>>>> opinions are self education responses to the semantics from experts
>>>>> and
>>>>> must be subjected to the rigour of independent peer review.
>>>>>
>>>>> - dolf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23/8/21 16:08, dolf wrote:
>>>>>> Cortese (2016, p 3) in agreeing with others (Smart and Haldane, 2003)
>>>>>> rejects the indeterminist notion that our immersive interoperability
>>>>>> within the world (kosmos) is subject to a "quantum mechanical
>>>>>> trigger"
>>>>>> which motivates our freedom towards any will to action.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My concern with such a notion is that my objects of perception are
>>>>>> here written words as Cortese's chapter on Technic Self-Determination
>>>>>> to be precise with the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC at the time of reading and
>>>>>> contemplation:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1510 HOURS ON 23 AUGUST 2021 GIVES TEMPORAL HEURISTIC
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GRAPPLE: [#78, #71, #7, #40, #25, #18, #10, #19, #61] PROTOTYPE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #THREE:    #126    as #45 - GREATNESS (TA)
>>>>>> #FOUR:        #203    as #41 - RESPONSE (YING)
>>>>>> #FIVE:        #329    as #5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       #327 as [#3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] /
>>>>>> #770 as [#3, #100, #1, #500, #70, #40, #5, #50, #1] = gráphō (G1125):
>>>>>> {UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with reference to the form of
>>>>>> the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) letters on a tablet,
>>>>>> parchment, paper, or other material; 2) to write, with reference to
>>>>>> the contents of the writing; 2a) to express in written characters;
>>>>>> 2b)
>>>>>> to commit to writing (things not to be forgotten), write down,
>>>>>> record;
>>>>>> 2c) used of those things which stand written in the sacred books (of
>>>>>> the OT); 2d) to write to one, i.e. by writing (in a written epistle)
>>>>>> to give information, directions; 3) to fill with writing; 4) to draw
>>>>>> up in writing, compose;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixed determinism requires a world that (a) has a well-defined state
>>>>>> or description, at any given time, and (b) laws of nature that are
>>>>>> true at all places and times. However Kant within idea @225 of his
>>>>>> Prolegomena (1783) suggests that time in itself cannot be perceived:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "All appearances are in time, in which, as substratum (as the
>>>>>> persisting form of inner intuition), simultaneous existence as
>>>>>> well as
>>>>>> succession can alone be represented. Therefore time, in which every
>>>>>> change in the appearances is to be thought, remains and does not
>>>>>> change; for in it alone can successive or simultaneous existence be
>>>>>> represented, as its determinations. Now time in itself cannot be
>>>>>> perceived. Consequently, in the objects of perception, i.e., in the
>>>>>> appearances, a substratum must be found that represents time in
>>>>>> general and in which all change or simultaneous existence can be
>>>>>> perceived through the relation of the appearances to it in
>>>>>> apprehension. But substance – the substratum of everything real,
>>>>>> i.e.,
>>>>>> of everything belonging to the existence of things – is that in which
>>>>>> every- thing that belongs to existence can be thought only as a
>>>>>> determination. Consequently, that which persists – in relation to
>>>>>> which alone all time- relations of the appearances can be
>>>>>> determined –
>>>>>> is the substance in the appearances, i.e., the real in them, which as
>>>>>> the substratum of all change remains always the same. Since this
>>>>>> therefore cannot change in existence, its quantum in nature can also
>>>>>> be neither increased nor diminished. [p 183]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As we explore this chapter further, we'll need to consider whether a
>>>>>> noumenon based "quantum mechanical trigger" is a self-modulating
>>>>>> characteristic to "an ontology of self-determination".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23/8/21 12:58, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>> Before we continue on the noetic lexicon navigation within our
>>>>>>> GRUMBLE prototype I'm going to take a break to read a research
>>>>>>> chapter from the International Journal of Technoethics and a book so
>>>>>>> as to make an accommodation of ideas expressed therein and as
>>>>>>> syncretism progress my own semantics of experience:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - The Technoethical Ethos of Technic Self-Deterimination by
>>>>>>> Francesco
>>>>>>> A. B. Cortese (2016)
>>>>>>> - The Electromagnetic Brain by Shelli Joye (2020)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In summary we find on pages 5 & 6 this comment relevant to our
>>>>>>> *ONTIC* understanding of @1 - self, #492 - freewill and #491 -
>>>>>>> agency
>>>>>>> (ie. @84, @86, @102, @104, @115)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cortese (2016) says "Our position implicit within the thesis of this
>>>>>>> paper falls within compatibilism. Indeed, we contend that
>>>>>>> freewill is
>>>>>>> not only compatible with determinism – but that determinism is
>>>>>>> actually a necessary precondition for free will (which we will use
>>>>>>> synonymously in this paper with autonomy and self- determination).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If such means of partial determination (and thus of partial
>>>>>>> self-determination) WERE AVAILABLE DURING THE *MILLENNIA* (or maybe
>>>>>>> two) IN WHICH THE SEEMING INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN FREE WILL AND
>>>>>>> CAUSAL DETERMINISM BECAME ENTRENCHED WITHIN THE WESTERN
>>>>>>> PHILOSOPHICAL
>>>>>>> TRADITION, then it is likely that the dilemma of determinism
>>>>>>> wouldn’t
>>>>>>> have posed such an unquestionable affront to the *ONTIC* legitimacy
>>>>>>> of our autonomy and agency.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Causal determinism is, roughly speaking, the idea that every
>>>>>>> event is
>>>>>>> necessitated by antecedent events and conditions together with the
>>>>>>> laws of nature:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Conceptual Issues in Determinism
>>>>>>> 2.1 The World
>>>>>>> 2.2 The way things are at a time
>>>>>>> 2.3 Thereafter
>>>>>>> 2.4 Laws of nature
>>>>>>> 2.5 Fixed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Determinism requires a world that (a) has a well-defined state or
>>>>>>> description, at any given time, and (b) laws of nature that are true
>>>>>>> at all places and times. If we have all these, then if (a) and (b)
>>>>>>> together logically entail the state of the world at all other times
>>>>>>> (or, at least, all times later than that given in (a)), the world is
>>>>>>> deterministic. Logical entailment, in a sense broad enough to
>>>>>>> encompass mathematical consequence, is the modality behind the
>>>>>>> determination in “determinism.”
>>>>>>> <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The idea is ancient, but first became subject to clarification and
>>>>>>> mathematical analysis in the eighteenth century.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Towards that end, we are currently at the vCognition vantage
>>>>>>> point of
>>>>>>> the GRAPPLE HEURISTIC@[21,43,60,65,66,69,71,72,81] considering the
>>>>>>> NOETIC LEXICON COGNITION {IDEA #206 AS #THREE / #342 AS #FOUR -
>>>>>>> PYTHAGOREAN ONOMANTIC PROTOTYPE #SIX - ROMAN / #FIVE - TORAH} and
>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>> intention is to then evolve the visualization as each of these
>>>>>>> LEXICON / NOETIC concepts of "GOD THE CENTRE OF VALUE THEORY WITHIN
>>>>>>> THEOLOGY" within the sectarian #71 - WORLDVIEW of either or
>>>>>>> collectively:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       ⁃    ALLAHU AKBAR (God is Great)
>>>>>>>       ⁃    DEUS VULT (God wills it)
>>>>>>>       ⁃    DIEU ET MON DROIT (God and my right)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By such notions as STRONGS reference dârash (H1875): {UMBRA: #504 %
>>>>>>> #41 = #12}} 1a2) *TO* *CONSULT*, *ENQUIRE* *OF*, *SEEK*; i) *OF*
>>>>>>> *GOD*;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <div>
>>>>>>>       <span name="0">H1875</span>
>>>>>>> </div>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In whatsoever manner available:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> H1875 (דרשנו):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which is infinitely expandable."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whereas the result having four {value: [70, 10, 5, 57], position:
>>>>>>> [5,
>>>>>>> 6, 7, 3], type: 128} of nine grapple [] array value elements by an
>>>>>>> COINRULES.library.intersectGrappleArray([2, 70, 10, 71, 9, 8, 38, 5,
>>>>>>> 57], [4, 4, 81, 57, 55, 70, 10, 5, 72]) action ought to convey some
>>>>>>> sensibility to us that the values array: [70, 10, 5, 57] were
>>>>>>> matched
>>>>>>> within positions [5, 6, 7, 3] and were a sequential match within
>>>>>>> nous
>>>>>>> #5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO) being position 7 of the grapple [] array.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The philosophical consideration on "#902 - AUTOS + #68 - RIGHTS =
>>>>>>> #970 - NOMOS" is an exemplar concern for HETERONOMY AGAINST
>>>>>>> AUTONOMY.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - dolf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/8/21 12:59, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>> Our logical thinking task for this week will be to implement the
>>>>>>>> intersectGrappleArray() function so as to make meaningful
>>>>>>>> extrapolations between the noetic / lexicon grapple [] array and
>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>> viable matching within the noumenon...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> var zen = 1, row = 1, col = 1;
>>>>>>>> var noetic = GNOSIS.research.data.noetic;
>>>>>>>> var grapple = null;
>>>>>>>> var modes = ['feme', 'male'];
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for (var entry of noetic) {
>>>>>>>>       for (var telos in entry.item) {
>>>>>>>>           if (!isNaN(telos)) {
>>>>>>>>               for (var zen = 1; zen < 10; zen++) {
>>>>>>>>                   for (var row = 1; row < 10; row++) {
>>>>>>>>                       for (var col = 1; col < 10; col++) {
>>>>>>>>                           for (var proto of
>>>>>>>> GNOSIS.research.proto) {
>>>>>>>>                               for (var wing of modes) {
>>>>>>>>                                   grapple =
>>>>>>>> GNOSIS.research.intersectGrappleArray (entry.item[telos].grapple,
>>>>>>>> GRAPPLEMATRIX[zen][row][col][proto][wing]);
>>>>>>>>                                   if (grapple.type > 0)
>>>>>>>> GNOSIS.research.determineGrappleMatch({
>>>>>>>>                                           zen: zen,
>>>>>>>>                                           row: row,
>>>>>>>>                                           col: col,
>>>>>>>>                                           entry: entry,
>>>>>>>>                                           proto: proto,
>>>>>>>>                                           wing: wing,
>>>>>>>>                                           result: grapple,
>>>>>>>>                                           grapple1:
>>>>>>>> entry.item[telos].grapple,
>>>>>>>>                                           grapple2:
>>>>>>>> GRAPPLEMATRIX[zen][row][col][proto][wing]
>>>>>>>>                                       });
>>>>>>>>                               }
>>>>>>>>                           }
>>>>>>>>                       }
>>>>>>>>                   }
>>>>>>>>               }
>>>>>>>>           }
>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This value for example
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> value: {
>>>>>>>>       70 - Severance,
>>>>>>>>       10 - Defectiveness / Distortion,
>>>>>>>>       5 - Keeping Small,
>>>>>>>>       57 - Guardedness
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 4 values:
>>>>>>>> feme check:
>>>>>>>> {value: [70, 10, 5, 57], position: [5, 6, 7, 3], type: 128}
>>>>>>>> grapple1: [2, 70, 10, 71, 9, 8, 38, 5, 57] (9)
>>>>>>>> grapple2: [4, 4, 81, 57, 55, 70, 10, 5, 72] (
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/8/21 12:51, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Thusly to summarise our two command {} task automations:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a) the first command {} task automation manifested a STRONGS
>>>>>>>>> definition from the vCognition vantage point of a DOM tag having
>>>>>>>>> id="NLC-20210805075910385015-H1875" where the Noetic Lexicon
>>>>>>>>> Cognition instantiation of details occurs
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> b) the second command {} task automation manifested the
>>>>>>>>> gnomicImperative() for each of the lexicon[strongs] items.  By
>>>>>>>>> deploying the existing FORMS.reports.ideaLookup(this) and
>>>>>>>>> FORMS.reports.lexiconLookup(this idea and strongs lookup
>>>>>>>>> mechansism
>>>>>>>>> from the vantage point of a DOM <div> tag having
>>>>>>>>> id="NLC-20210805075910385015" starting point:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>>>> (d3.select(`div[id^='NLC-${GNOSIS.grizzle.data.gizmo.id}']`).size())
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That our logical thinking task for tomorrow will be to implement
>>>>>>>>> the ONTIC defintion as our third command {} task automation:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (c) the third command {} task automation manifest the ONTIC
>>>>>>>>> defition for the strongs and insert the task automation between
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> other task automations:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @one - first command {} task automatiom
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @three - <--- insert third command {} task automatiom
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @two - second command {} task automatiom
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *STATUS* *UPDATE* @ 0900 HOURS ON 7 AUGUST 2021: We've implemented
>>>>>>>>> the second command {} task automation to manifest the filter
>>>>>>>>> designated noetic lexicon telos expansions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It presently utilises the legacy _memeBrain.gnomicImperative() of
>>>>>>>>> which we've still undecided as to whether we'll redo this entirely
>>>>>>>>> within the present nuanced command {} task automation semantical
>>>>>>>>> formulation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Our subsequent visualisation which was done entirely within the
>>>>>>>>> command {} task automation and manifest from the vCognition
>>>>>>>>> vantage
>>>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for (var item in lexicon[strongs]) {
>>>>>>>>>       if (!isNaN(item)) {
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       <-- each of these LEXICON / NOETIC concepts is displayed
>>>>>>>>> as a
>>>>>>>>> definition equivalent to the SpiralSelector@Lexicon panel.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We're now going to undertake a second command {} task
>>>>>>>>> automation to
>>>>>>>>> display the gnomicImperative for each of the lexicon[strongs]
>>>>>>>>> items.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/21 12:46, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> STATUS UPDATE @ 1235 HOURS ON 6 AUGUST 2021: We've succeeded in
>>>>>>>>>> nuancing the code semantics of getLexiconDetail() function
>>>>>>>>>> relevant to the need of our NOETIC concepts deployment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is done entirely within the command {} task automation.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Our next action within this subsequent visualisation will to do
>>>>>>>>>> each of the filter designated noetic telos expansions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And that shall be our weekend logical thinking activity which is
>>>>>>>>>> undertaken at a leisurely pace.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.grapple369.com/?scenario>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Our logical thinking task for today will be to manifest the
>>>>>>>>>> subsequent visualization which occurs from the vCognition vantage
>>>>>>>>>> point,  By nuancing the code semantics of getLexiconDetail()
>>>>>>>>>> relevant as to the need of NOETIC concepts deployment involving
>>>>>>>>>> actions of display relavent to the lexiconExpand () task
>>>>>>>>>> automation as retrieval and display of the LEXICON json {}
>>>>>>>>>> entry...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> return ([
>>>>>>>>>>       '<p>',
>>>>>>>>>>       (act.strongs[0] == 'H') ? '<span class="Hebrew">' : '',
>>>>>>>>>>       (act.strongs[0] == 'G') ? '<span class="Greek">' : '',
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       COINRULES.automate.getCharacters(nodes[0], strongs[0]),
>>>>>>>>>>       '</span></p>',
>>>>>>>>>>       "<p><font color='black'><strong>", notions(),
>>>>>>>>>> '</strong>', '
>>>>>>>>>> = ', '</font>',
>>>>>>>>>>       "<font color='blue'>", STRONGS[strongs].data.xlit ,
>>>>>>>>>> "</font>
>>>>>>>>>> ", "(<strong><span class='lexiconNormal'
>>>>>>>>>> onclick='FORMS.reports.lexiconLookup(this)'>" , strongs,
>>>>>>>>>> "</span></strong>): ",
>>>>>>>>>>       "<font color='red'><strong>{UMBRA: <span
>>>>>>>>>> class='biblosFocus'
>>>>>>>>>> onclick='FORMS.reports.ideaLookup(this)'>#", u,  "</span> % #41 =
>>>>>>>>>> ", '#', THOTH,
>>>>>>>>>>       COINRULES.automate.popANKH(u, 1, true),
>>>>>>>>>> "}</strong></font> ",
>>>>>>>>>> COINRULES.automate.popMeaning(STRONGS[strongs].data.outline,
>>>>>>>>>> true,
>>>>>>>>>> "; "),
>>>>>>>>>>       "</p>"
>>>>>>>>>> ].join(''));
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/8/21 14:07, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Our first visualization as each of these LEXICON / NOETIC
>>>>>>>>>>> concepts is to provide an equivalent display of definition on
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> SpiralSelector@Lexicon panel.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And to do so, we're going to deploy a task automations to
>>>>>>>>>>> similarly retrieve the STRONGS {} json and update accordingly
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> DOM id="NLC-20210805075910385015-H1875" as the Noetic Lexicon
>>>>>>>>>>> Cognition.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That we are presently @ the vantage point of a vCognition, in
>>>>>>>>>>> having accomplished retrieving the LEXICON json {} entry
>>>>>>>>>>> relavent
>>>>>>>>>>> to the NOETIC concepts {}:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> var vCognition = nlc.append ('span')
>>>>>>>>>>>       .html (` - <font
>>>>>>>>>>> color='red'><stongs>Strongs:</strong></font> ${d.strongs} has
>>>>>>>>>>> been retrieved...`);
>>>>>>>>>>>                                           var nlc =
>>>>>>>>>>> d3.select(`#NLC-${GNOSIS.grizzle.data.gizmo.id}-${d.strongs}`);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our subsequent visualization ought of necessity be from that
>>>>>>>>>>> vCognition vantage point then vCognition.append the
>>>>>>>>>>> SpiralSelector@Lexicon panel cognitions as NOETIC @telos {}
>>>>>>>>>>> concepts
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.grapple369.com/gnosis/research.json>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/8/21 22:19, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The most efficient approach to implementing our LEXICON /
>>>>>>>>>>>> NOETIC
>>>>>>>>>>>> concepts navigator which is now accessible as the 'Noetic
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ideas'
>>>>>>>>>>>> option from our gizmo menu action, is to build a d3.data []
>>>>>>>>>>>> array conveying the essential diegesis.lexicon {} items to then
>>>>>>>>>>>> display the Noetic Lexicon Cognitions by means of our present
>>>>>>>>>>>> RESEARCH concept as an integral component making a d3call to
>>>>>>>>>>>> instantiate them in an equivalent node.enter() methodology as
>>>>>>>>>>>> conveyed within our <svg> concepts thru 3rd party
>>>>>>>>>>>> COINRULES.modules {}.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> instantiateNoeticLexiconCognitions: function (el) {
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       var id = el.property ("id");
>>>>>>>>>>>       var noetic = GNOSIS.research.data.noetic;
>>>>>>>>>>>       var lexicon = GNOSIS.research.data.lexicon;
>>>>>>>>>>>       var telos = {}
>>>>>>>>>>>       var initialTelos = undefined;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       var node = el
>>>>>>>>>>>           .selectAll("div")
>>>>>>>>>>>           .data(noetic);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       var nodeEnter = node.enter()
>>>>>>>>>>>           .append("div")
>>>>>>>>>>>           .attr("id", (d) =>
>>>>>>>>>>> `NLC-${GNOSIS.grizzle.data.gizmo.id}-${d.strongs}`);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       // node initial span
>>>>>>>>>>>    ��  nodeEnter.append ('span')
>>>>>>>>>>>           .attr("name", (d) => d.node)
>>>>>>>>>>>           .on('click', function (ev, d) {
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               alert(`Getting - ${d.strongs}`);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>           })
>>>>>>>>>>>           .each (function (d) {
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               var node = d.node;
>>>>>>>>>>>               var strongs = d.strongs;
>>>>>>>>>>>               var lexicon = d.lexicon;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               d3.select (this)
>>>>>>>>>>>                   .append ("span")
>>>>>>>>>>>                   .html (function (d) {
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       var str = [];
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       initialTelos = undefined;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       for (var item in lexicon[strongs]) {
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                           if (!isNaN(item)) {
>>>>>>>>>>>                               switch ("undefined") {
>>>>>>>>>>>                               case (typeof initialTelos) :
>>>>>>>>>>>                                   initialTelos = item;
>>>>>>>>>>>                                   break;
>>>>>>>>>>>                               }
>>>>>>>>>>>                               str.push (`${(str.length) ? ", " :
>>>>>>>>>>> `<strong>${d.strongs} - </strong>`}@${item}`);
>>>>>>>>>>>                               telos [item] = {}
>>>>>>>>>>>                           }
>>>>>>>>>>>                       }
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       return (str.join(''));
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                   });
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                   var tasks = [];
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                   tasks.push (
>>>>>>>>>>>                       {retry: {count: 1000, id:
>>>>>>>>>>> GNOSIS.grizzle.data.gizmo.id}},
>>>>>>>>>>>                       {LEXICON_request: {format: "lexicon",
>>>>>>>>>>> seek:
>>>>>>>>>>> d.strongs, telos: initialTelos}},
>>>>>>>>>>>                       {isLexicon: d.strongs, onfail: {error:
>>>>>>>>>>> `Cannot load LEXICON entry for STRONGS reference: ${strongs}`}},
>>>>>>>>>>>                       {command: {task: function (act) {
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                            var nlc =
>>>>>>>>>>> d3.select(`#NLC-${GNOSIS.grizzle.data.gizmo.id}-${d.strongs}`);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                            nlc.append ('span')
>>>>>>>>>>>                                .html (` - <font
>>>>>>>>>>> color='red'><stongs>Strongs:</strong></font> ${d.strongs} has
>>>>>>>>>>> been retrieved...`);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                        }, params: {}}},
>>>>>>>>>>>                   )
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                   var task = {
>>>>>>>>>>>                       id: GNOSIS.grizzle.data.gizmo.id,
>>>>>>>>>>>                       initialise: true,
>>>>>>>>>>>                       tasks: tasks
>>>>>>>>>>>                   }
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                   setTimeout(function() {
>>>>>>>>>>>                       return (COINRULES.automate.action(task));
>>>>>>>>>>>                   });
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>           });
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       // node
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       // ****
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <div>
>>>>>>>>>>>>       <span name="0">H1875</span>
>>>>>>>>>>>> </div>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Our intention is to then evolve the visualization as each of
>>>>>>>>>>>> these LEXICON / NOETIC concepts in a whatever manner available
>>>>>>>>>>>> which is infinitely expandable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/8/21 06:37, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overnight we transitioned to Qingrong Ke's File *saveAs* code
>>>>>>>>>>>>> due to its later development and dramatically reduced
>>>>>>>>>>>>> coding size.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our task today will be to implement a LEXICON / NOETIC
>>>>>>>>>>>>> concepts
>>>>>>>>>>>>> panel to display our data via the gizmo menu action... We'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to deploy our intersectGrappleArray() to then dynamically
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reorder the data to convey its priority emphasis given the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> likelihood for any matches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/21 14:39, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've had to correct an error within our saveNoeticContext()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function which was due to the non ordinal nature of our STEM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference that can sometimes be a paired reference as an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object of two arrays rather than a single array;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       switch (true) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       case (typeof (cognitions[strongs][idea][0]) ==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "object") :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           stems = cognitions[strongs][idea];
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           break;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       default :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           stems = {0: cognitions[strongs][idea]}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And in discovering that problem and investigating the written
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scenario file, we've discovered that there are some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "undefined" elements within the "noetic" array which we are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now resolving - *RESOLVED*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

dolf

unread,
Aug 26, 2021, 3:07:01 AMAug 26
to
Human Enhancement Technology (*HET*) is according to Cortese (2016, p
4), typically defined as any technological attempt to overcome or
obviate the biological limitations of the human body and brain or extend
the capacities and faculties of the human body and brain beyond their
normative range of capacities and faculties.

TIME X --> [NOUMENON] <-- TIME Y

<https://www.grapple369.com/?time:16.56>

#392 as [#2, #300, #40, #10, #600] = shâmayim (H8064): {UMBRA: #390 %
#41 = #21} 1) heaven, heavens, sky; 1a) visible heavens, sky; 1a1) as
abode of the stars; 1a2) as the visible universe, the sky, atmosphere,
etc; 1b) Heaven (as the abode of God);

#392 as [#1, #10, #200, #9, #1, #50, #70, #40, #1, #10] = aisthánomai
(G143): {UMBRA: #392 % #41 = #23} 1) to perceive; 1a) by the bodily
senses; 1b) with the mind, understand;

Given our understanding of noumenon as a neuro-linguistic concept with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) in being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]) against which is made a resonance
as the subjective conception of phenomenal experience.

#369 - HUMAN DISCRIMINATING NORM: ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—>
#164 intersection of its noumenon: 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 -
SELF and the #728 - MORPHOS

#728 as [#40, #70, #100, #500, #8, #10] = morphḗ (G3444): {UMBRA: #718 %
#41 = #21} 1) the form by which a person or thing strikes the vision; 2)
external appearance;

The notion of technique and thought as 'works of the mind' asserts
Cortese (2016, p 13), are equally viable and vital components of the
human condition which is met with much less resistance than the notion
that technology is so. Perhaps merely because technique and methodology
cannot be physically separated from the mind (except when it is embodied
in technology), and could not continue existing if humanity went extinct
tomorrow – in contrast to technology, which could do both.

We would intuitively ask the question relative to the anthropocentric
(ie. human being as the central or most important element of existence)
characteristic:

Whether mind is constituted by a sensibility of determinism as cognitive
process of apprehension assisted by a ratiocination construct (ie.
theory that the universe is utterly rational: 22 / 7) such as #2184 -
anthropologic cosmogonic principle?

#2184 x 49 = 107,016 days (294 x 364)

107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126 tropical year

TO BE CONTINUED ...
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages