info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
-- WE KNOW THE ANCIENT OF DAYS END OF NAIDOC WEEK ABORIGINAL (OVER 40,000 YEAR HISTORY) RECONCILIATION: HEAL COUNTRY {#81 - SOVEREIGN / #65 - SOLDIER / #60 - CENTRE}
0 views
Skip to first unread message
dolf
Jul 11, 2021, 4:44:04 AM7/11/21
to
-- HEAL COUNTRY {#81 - SOVEREIGN / #65 - SOLDIER / #60 - CENTRE}
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 11 July, 2021
CUSTOMER FEEDBACK ON YARN INDIGENOUS CLOTHING: It suits my ONTIC (ie.
centre of circle) philosophy and so it will be a pleasure to wear it:
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: (right) Although the Wimbledon Trophy awarded to Australia's Ash
Barty on Saturday 10 JULY 2021, is named after Venus, it is a figure of
Temperance holding a wine cup that decorates the central boss. Around
this, a broad band of ornament containing four plaques with figures
represents the STOICHEION ELEMENTS air, water, earth, and fire. In oval
panels on the rim are the Seven Liberal Arts and their patron Minerva:
Grammar, Reason, Rhetoric, Music, Arithmetic, Geometry and Astrology]
#CENTRE: always was, #CIRCUMSCRIBED: always will be.
And the #205 <—> #164 intersection @ #CENTRE is both the ONTIC premise
for the origin of language and the basis (ie. EGO (NATURE) (@1 - SELF +
#491 - AGENCY: ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS) for the #421 - CAUSE OF REASON
(ie. FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS TO #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL AND #75 -
FAILURE (SHIH) DETERMINATION) as cohesion and coherence expressed by the
entirety of the syllogism being then actionable by tasks of #27 - DUTIES.
<https://www.yarn.com.au>
“AND WHO, AS I, SHALL CALL, AND SHALL DECLARE IT, AND SET IT IN ORDER
FOR ME, SINCE I APPOINTED THE ANCIENT PEOPLE?
/ #156 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 6 / 9 JULY
2021 as [#70, #6, #30, #40, #10] /
#186 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 9 JULY 2021as [#40,
#70, #6, #30, #600] / [#6, #40, #70, #30, #600] /
#192 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#6,
#40, #70, #6, #30, #600] /
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL as [#5, #30, #70, #6, #30, #40, #10, #600]
= ʻôwlâm (H5769): {UMBRA: #146 % #41 = #23} 1) long duration, antiquity,
futurity, for ever, ever, everlasting, evermore, perpetual, old,
ancient, world; 1a) ancient time, long time (of past); 1b) (of future);
1b1) for ever, always; 1b2) *CONTINUOUS* *EXISTENCE*, *PERPETUAL*; 1b3)
everlasting, indefinite or unending future, eternity;
AND THE THINGS THAT ARE COMING, AND SHALL COME, LET THEM SHEW UNTO THEM.
FEAR YE NOT, NEITHER BE AFRAID: HAVE NOT I TOLD THEE FROM THAT TIME, AND
HAVE DECLARED IT? YE ARE EVEN MY WITNESSES. IS THERE A GOD BESIDE ME?
YEA, THERE IS NO GOD; I KNOW NOT ANY.
THEY THAT MAKE A GRAVEN IMAGE ARE ALL OF THEM VANITY; AND THEIR
DELECTABLE THINGS SHALL NOT PROFIT; AND THEY ARE THEIR OWN WITNESSES;
THEY SEE NOT, NOR KNOW; THAT THEY MAY BE ASHAMED.
#73 as [#2, #1, #30, #600] = ʼêl (H410): {UMBRA: #31 % #41 = #31} 1)
god, god-like one, mighty one; 1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty
heroes; 1b) angels; 1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations); 1d) God,
the one true God, Jehovah; 2) *MIGHTY* *THINGS* *IN* *NATURE*; 3)
strength, power;
WHO HATH FORMED A GOD-ʼêl (H410), OR MOLTEN A GRAVEN IMAGE THAT IS
PROFITABLE FOR NOTHING?
BEHOLD, ALL HIS FELLOWS SHALL BE ASHAMED: AND THE WORKMEN, THEY ARE OF
MEN: LET THEM ALL BE GATHERED TOGETHER, LET THEM STAND UP; YET THEY
SHALL FEAR, AND THEY SHALL BE ASHAMED TOGETHER…” [Isaiah 44:7-11]
*FACILITATORS* / *ARBITRATORS* OF #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
[@84, {@1: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3)}
@86, {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#11); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#8)}
@84, {@3: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#22); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#11)}
@86, {@4: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#38); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#16)}
@186, {@5: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#78); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#40)}
@84, {@6: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#121); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#43)}
@86, {@7: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN
AFFAIRS {%18}); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#48)}
@84, {@8: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38});
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#51)}
@86, {@9: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#276); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#56)}
@177, {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#347); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#71)}
@84, {@11: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#421); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#74)}
@86, {@12: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#500); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#79)}
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
@200, {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
@186, {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
@84, {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
@86, {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224)}
@177, {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239)}
@140] {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU
(#298)}
To the Hebrews the “dot within the circle” is the keṯer "Crown" also
known as Kether, which is the topmost of the sephirot of the Tree of
Life in Kabbalah. Since its meaning is "crown", it is interpreted as
both the "topmost" of the Sephirot and the "regal crown" of the Sephirot.
The first Sephirah is called the Crown, since a crown is worn above the
head. The Crown therefore refers to things that are above the mind's
abilities of comprehension. All of the other Sephirot are likened to the
body which starts with the head and winds its way down into action. But
the crown of a king lies above the head and connects the concept of
"monarchy", which is abstract and intangible, with the tangible and
concrete head of the king.
NOUMENON EXTENT ON RIGHTS: SUPERNAL: #561 - HEAD (OF A MAN) / ISRAEL,
EGO: #592 - THEÓTĒS (GODHEAD) [Colossians 2:9]
<https://www.grapple369.com/?zen:8,row:7,col:3>
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 7, col: 3, nous: 69 [DATE: (none), TIME: (none),
SUPER: #533 / #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 -
Resolution, Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION (YI), EGO: #592 / #69 - Profound Use, Function of the
Mysterious; I-Ching: H34 - Great Strength, Great Invigorating, The power
of the great, Great maturity; Tetra: 22 - RESISTANCE (KE)]
TELOS / ONTIC HIERARCHY FOR #561
[@171, {@1: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT:
SHU (#9)}
@156, {@2: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#12); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#84 - I
AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2})}
@200, {@3: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#53); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#122)}
@157] {@4: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#89); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU
(#198)}
TELOS TOTAL: #684
FEME: @84 = #84
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #84
GRUMBLE (#89, #198)@[9, 9, 3, 75, 41, 38, 36, 76]
#89 as [#30, #3, #6, #10, #600] = gôwy (H1471): {UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19}
1) nation, people; 1a) nation, people; 1a1) usually of non-Hebrew
people; 1a2) of descendants of Abraham; 1a3) of Israel; 1b) of swarm of
locusts, other animals (fig.); 1c) Goyim? = 'nations';
#89 as [#6, #8, #20, #40, #10, #5] = châkâm (H2450): {UMBRA: #68 % #41 =
#27} 1) wise, wise (man); 1a) skilful (in technical work); 1b) wise (in
administration); 1c) shrewd, crafty, cunning, wily, subtle; 1d) learned,
shrewd (class of men); 1e) prudent; 1f) wise (ethically and religiously);
#160 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#40,
#40, #6, #70, #4] /
#192 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#2,
#40, #6, #70, #4, #10, #20, #600] /
#198 as [#6, #2, #40, #6, #70, #4, #10, #20, #600] = môwʻêd (H4150):
{UMBRA: #120 % #41 = #38} 1) appointed place, appointed time, meeting;
1a) appointed time; 1a1) appointed time (general); 1a2) sacred season,
set feast, appointed season; 1b) appointed meeting; 1c) appointed place;
1d) appointed sign or signal; 1e) tent of meeting;
GRUNTLE (#225, #287)@[9, 9, 18, 9, 21, 3, 15, 75, 56, 41, 13, 38, 49,
36, 44, 76]
#225 as [#1, #4, #10, #200, #10] = ʼaddîyr (H117): {UMBRA: #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) great, majestic; 1a) of waters of sea; 1b) of a tree; 1c) of
kings, nations, gods; 2) great one, majestic one; 2a) of nobles,
chieftains, servants;
#225 as [#5, #3, #2, #10, #200, #5] = gᵉbîyrâh (H1377): {UMBRA: #220 %
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
#234 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#6,
#1, #7, #20, #200] /
#253 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#10,
#7, #20, #10, #200, #6] /
#285 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#2,
#7, #20, #200, #50, #6] /
#287 as [#7, #20, #200, #50, #10] / [#50, #7, #20, #10, #200] = zâkar
(H2142): {UMBRA: #227 % #41 = #22} 1) to remember, recall, call to mind;
1a) (Qal) to remember, recall; 1b) (Niphal) to be brought to
remembrance, be remembered, be thought of, be brought to mind; 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to cause to remember, remind; 1c2) to cause to be
remembered, keep in remembrance; 1c3) to mention; 1c4) to record; 1c5)
to make a memorial, make remembrance;
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/ProtoHumanHand.jpg>
This first Sefirah represents the primal stirrings of intent in the Ein
Soph (infinity), or the arousal of desire to come forth into the varied
life of being. But in this sense, although it contains all the potential
for content, it contains no content itself, and is therefore called
'Nothing', 'The Hidden Light', 'The air that cannot be grasped'. Being
desire to bring the world into being, Keter is absolute compassion.
YOUTUBE: "Phil Collins - In The Air Tonight LIVE HD"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeDMnyQzS88>
The name of God associated with Keter is Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh (Hebrew: אהיה
אשר אהיה), the name {ie.
"I am who I am,"
"I will become what I choose to become,"
"I am what I am,"
"I will be what I will be,"
"I create what(ever) I create," or
"I am the Existing One."
The traditional English translation within Judaism favours "I will be
what I will be" because there is no present tense of the verb "to be" in
the Hebrew language
} through which he revealed himself to Moses from the burning bush. "It
is from the name Ehyeh that all kinds of sustenance emanate, coming from
the source, which is the infinite".
[א,ה,י,ה ,א,ש,ר ,א,ה,י,ה]
[א, {@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1)}
ה, {@2: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#7); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#6)}
י, {@3: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#23); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#16)}
ה , {@4: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#44); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#21)}
א, {@5: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#66); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#22)}
ש, {@6: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#145); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU
(#79)}
ר , {@7: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO
THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
{%35}); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#117)}
א, {@8: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#218); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#118)}
ה, {@9: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#260); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#123)}
י, {@10: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#312); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#133)}
ה] {@11: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#369); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#138)}
TELOS TOTAL: #543
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #181
MALE: @181 = #181
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #235
FEME: @117 + @118 = #235
GRUMBLE (#369, #138)@[1, 1, 6, 5, 16, 10, 21, 5, 22, 1, 79, 57, 36, 38,
37, 1, 42, 5, 52, 10, 57, 5]
#313 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 6 JULY 2021 as
[#300, #1, #2, #10] /
#325 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#6,
#10, #300, #1, #2, #6] /
#333 - ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #FIVE / #CENTRE as [#30, #300, #1, #2] /
#369 as [#10, #300, #1, #2, #6, #700] = shâʼab (H7579): {UMBRA: #303 %
#41 = #16} 1) to draw (water); 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to draw (water); 1a2)
water-drawing women (participle);
#369 as [#80, #30, #1, #50, #8, #200] = plánē (G4106): {UMBRA: #169 %
#41 = #5} 1) a wandering, a straying about; 1a) one led astray from the
right way, roams hither and thither; 2) metaph.; 2a) mental straying;
2a1) error, wrong opinion relative to morals or religion; 2b) error
which shows itself in action, a wrong mode of acting; 2c) error, that
which leads into error, deceit or fraud;
#424 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 6 JULY 2021 as [#5,
#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #50] /
#175 - CONSTITUTE, #176 - ORDER, #177 - DECLARE as [#80, #70, #10, #5,
#10] /
#374 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#5,
#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1] /
#369 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] = poiéō
(G4160): {UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of
things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the
authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce,
bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self;
1f) to make a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one
anything; 1g1) to (make i.e.) constitute or appoint one anything, to
appoint or ordain one that; 1g2) to (make i.e.) declare one anything;
1h) to put one forth, to lead him out; 1i) to make one do something;
1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors of a thing (to cause, bring
about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well; 2a1) to carry out, to
execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one; 2c) with
designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate, keep; 2d1) to
make ready, and so at the same time to institute, the celebration of the
passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
#88 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#8,
#30, #40, #10] /
#138 as [#8, #30, #40, #10, #700] = chêlem (H2493): {UMBRA: #78 % #41 =
#37} 1) dream;
#113 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#5,
#8, #40, #60] /
#138 as [#30, #8, #40, #60] = châmâç (H2555): {UMBRA: #108 % #41 = #26}
1) violence, wrong, cruelty, injustice;
The Dreaming, also referred to as Dreamtime, is a term devised by early
anthropologists to refer to a religio-cultural worldview attributed to
Australian Aboriginal beliefs.
YOUTUBE: “Fleetwood Mac - Dreams”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuL8-8xm4QU>
The Dreaming is used to represent Aboriginal concepts of Everywhen
during which the land was inhabited by ancestral figures, often of
heroic proportions or with supernatural abilities.
The word ‘everywhen’ is usually collocated with everywhere in the phrase
everywhere and everywhen, where it often denotes continuous existence or
inexistence in time and space (ie. always, at all times as the infinity)
, and as such, it is commonly found in theological and spiritual contexts.
These figures were often distinct from gods as they did not control the
material world and were not worshipped, but only revered. The concept of
the Dreamtime has subsequently become widely adopted beyond its original
Australian context and is now part of global popular culture. [ref:
Wikipedia]
GRUNTLE (#612, #507)@[1, 1, 2, 1, 8, 6, 13, 5, 29, 16, 39, 10, 60, 21,
65, 5, 6, 22, 7, 1, 5, 79, 62, 57, 17, 36, 55, 38, 11, 37, 12, 1, 54,
42, 59, 5, 30, 52, 40, 10, 16, 57, 21, 5]
#612 as [#6, #30, #40, #6, #80, #400, #10, #600] = môwphêth (H4159):
{UMBRA: #526 % #41 = #34} 1) wonder, sign, miracle, portent; 1a) wonder
(as a special display of God's power); 1b) sign, token (of future event);
#612 as [#2, #200, #10, #400] / [#2, #200, #400, #10] = bᵉrîyth (H1285):
{UMBRA: #612 % #41 = #38} 1) *COVENANT*, *ALLIANCE*, *PLEDGE*; 1a)
between men; 1a1) treaty, alliance, league (man to man); 1a2)
constitution, ordinance (monarch to subjects); 1a3) agreement, pledge
(man to man); 1a4) alliance (of friendship); 1a5) alliance (of
marriage); 1b) between God and man; 1b1) alliance (of friendship); 1b2)
covenant (divine ordinance with signs or pledges); 1c) (phrases); 1c1)
covenant making; 1c2) covenant keeping; 1c3) covenant violation;
#507 as [#6, #40, #30, #20, #6, #400, #5] = malkûwth (H4438): {UMBRA:
#496 % #41 = #4} 1) royalty, royal power, reign, kingdom, sovereign
power; 1a) royal power, dominion; 1b) reign; 1c) kingdom, realm;
#507 as [#5, #2, #300, #200] / [#2, #300, #200, #5] = bâsâr (H1320):
{UMBRA: #502 % #41 = #10} 1) flesh; 1a) of the body; 1a1) of humans;
1a2) of animals; 1b) the body itself; 1c) male organ of generation
(euphemism); 1d) kindred, blood-relations; 1e) flesh as frail or erring
(man against God); 1f) all living things; 1g) animals; 1h) mankind;
Keter, although being the highest Sephirah of its world, receives from
the Sephirah of Malkuth of the domain above it (see Sephirot). The
uppermost Keter sits below no other Sephirah, although it is below Or
Ein Soph which is the source of all Sephirot. [Source: Wikipedia]
"GOD THAT MADE THE WORLD AND ALL THINGS THEREIN, SEEING THAT HE IS LORD
OF HEAVEN AND EARTH, DWELLETH NOT IN TEMPLES MADE WITH HANDS; NEITHER IS
WORSHIPPED WITH MEN'S HANDS, AS THOUGH HE NEEDED ANY THING, SEEING HE
GIVETH TO ALL LIFE, AND BREATH, AND ALL THINGS; AND HATH MADE OF ONE
BLOOD ALL NATIONS OF MEN FOR TO DWELL ON ALL THE FACE OF THE EARTH, AND
HATH DETERMINED THE TIMES BEFORE APPOINTED, AND THE BOUNDS OF THEIR
HABITATION; THAT THEY SHOULD SEEK THE LORD, IF HAPLY THEY MIGHT FEEL
AFTER HIM, AND FIND HIM, THOUGH HE BE NOT FAR FROM EVERY ONE OF US: FOR
IN HIM WE LIVE, AND MOVE, AND HAVE OUR BEING; AS CERTAIN ALSO OF YOUR
OWN POETS HAVE SAID, FOR WE ARE ALSO HIS OFFSPRING.
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1783) PROLEGOMENA COMMENTARY ON SECTION #13 - STATUS,
LOATHING SHAME; I-CHING: H5 - WAITING, DELAY, ATTENDING, MOISTENED,
ARRIVING; TETRA: 17 - HOLDING BACK (JUAN) AS IDEA @294: "Since I
therefore grant their reality to the things that we represent to
ourselves through the senses, and limit our sensory intuition of these
things only to the extent that in no instance whatsoever, not even in
the pure intuitions of space and time, does it represent anything more
than mere appearances of these things, and never their quality in
themselves, this is therefore no thorough-going illusion ascribed by me
to nature, and my protestation against all imputation of idealism is so
conclusive and clear that it would even seem superfluous if there were
not *UNAUTHORIZED* *JUDGES* who, being glad to have an *ANCIENT* *NAME*
*FOR* *EVERY* *DEVIATION* *FROM* *THEIR* *FALSE* *THOUGH* *COMMON*
*OPINION*, and never judging the spirit of philosophical nomenclatures
but merely clinging to the letter, were ready to put their own folly in
the place of well-determined concepts, and thereby to twist and deform
them.
...
For what I called idealism did not concern the existence of things (the
doubting of which, however, properly constitutes idealism according to
the received meaning), for it never came into my mind to doubt that, but
only the sensory representation of things, to which space and time above
all belong; and about these last, hence in general about all
appearances, I have only shown: that they are not things (but mere ways
of representing), nor are they determinations that belong to things in
themselves.
The word transcendental, however, which with me never signifies a
relation of our cognition to things, but only to the faculty of
cognition, was intended to prevent this misinterpretation. But before it
prompts still more of the same, I gladly withdraw this name, and I will
have it called critical idealism.
But if it is an in fact reprehensible idealism to transform actual
things (not appearances) into mere representations, with what name shall
we christen that idealism which, conversely, makes mere representations
into things?
I think it could be named *DREAMING* idealism, to distinguish it from
the preceding, which may be called visionary idealism, both of which
were to have been held off by my formerly so-called transcendental, or
better, critical idealism." [pages 44 to 45]
#294 as [#9, #5, #70, #10, #200] = theós (G2316): {UMBRA: #284 % #41 =
#38} 1) a god or goddess, a general name of deities or divinities; 2)
the Godhead, trinity; 2a) God the Father, the first person in the
trinity; 2b) Christ, the second person of the trinity; 2c) Holy Spirit,
the third person in the trinity; 3) spoken of the only and true God; 3a)
refers to the things of God; 3b) his counsels, interests, things due to
him; 4) whatever can in any respect be likened unto God, or resemble him
in any way; 4a) God's representative or viceregent; 4a1) of magistrates
and judges;
FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD- theós (G2316) IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE,
GRAVEN BY ART AND MAN'S DEVICE. AND THE TIMES OF THIS IGNORANCE GOD
WINKED AT; BUT NOW COMMANDETH ALL MEN EVERY WHERE TO REPENT: BECAUSE HE
HATH APPOINTED A DAY, IN THE WHICH HE WILL *JUDGE* THE WORLD IN
RIGHTEOUSNESS BY THAT MAN WHOM HE HATH ORDAINED; WHEREOF HE HATH GIVEN
ASSURANCE UNTO ALL MEN, IN THAT HE HATH RAISED HIM FROM THE DEAD." [Acts
17:24-31]
THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF
DEVELOPMENT
I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract by Todd E. Feinberg and
Jon Mallatt: "Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the
Explanatory Gap".
ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has
been debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In
particular there is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or
radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.
THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then
impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle for
emergence of consciousness.
In that paper they use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the
emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three
progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems),
and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately
leading to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical
systems.
THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet
basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 / 7 then the central
unifying principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 -
formula of progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 +
METALOGIC #8 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x 8
TWO INSTANCE MODELS OF @168 - ONTIC CONSCIOUSNESS EMERGENCE
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
#501 - SECTION I OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT / #82 - TERMS OF
COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as [#1, #300, #200] /
#517 as [#6, #1, #300, #200, #10] = ʼesher (H835): {UMBRA: #501 % #41 =
#9} 1) happiness, blessedness; 1a) often used as interjection; 1b)
blessed are;
#511 as [#5, #90, #10, #400, #6] / [#6, #5, #90, #400, #10] /
#551 - SECTION III OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as [#6, #50, #90,
#400, #5] = yâtsath (H3341): {UMBRA: #500 % #41 = #8} 1) to kindle,
burn, set on fire; 1a) (Qal) to kindle; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be
kindled; 1b2) to be left desolate; 1c) (Hiphil) *TO* *SET* *ON* *FIRE*,
*KINDLE*;
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6]
#333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200,
#5] /
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
#362 - *SEE* *BELOW* *FOR* *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200,
#10, #600] = bâʻar (H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn,
consume, kindle, be kindled; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *BEGIN* *TO* *BURN*,
*BE* *KINDLED*, *START* *BURNING*; 1a2) to burn, be burning; 1a3) to
burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath (fig.); 1b) (Piel);
1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of guilt) (fig.); 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to consume (destroy);
1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous; 2a) (Qal) to be
stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be stupid,
dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to be
grazed over;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{ @1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 -
ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26), @2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 -
DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92), @3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego:
19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#111), @4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73);
Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}), Male: #73; Feme: #168 } // #168
Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an
emergent property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation
Life + Special neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness
expresses these relationships. Then we consider the implications of our
findings for some of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the
apparent “explanatory gap” between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.
TERRA INCOGNITIA: That is the giving of names to places is an
encapsulation: 21 x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied a resonance
against rationalty: 24 x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that
consciousness requires some #5 - stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse
transcriptase) for its function as #369 - discriminating norm:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
We conclude that consciousness stems from the personal life (ie.
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its
noumenon: 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF and the #728 - MORPHOS)
of an organism with the addition of a complex nervous system that is
ideally suited to maximize emergent neurobiological features and that it
is an example of standard (“weak”) emergence without a scientific
explanatory gap. An “experiential” or epistemic gap remains, although
this is ontologically untroubling.
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304239/>
The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a
lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
(lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós,
“of words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω
(légō, “to speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to
gather, collect”).
[λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION:
YI (#30)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#35)}
ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#95)}
ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#105)}
κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)}
ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN
MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}
TELOS TOTAL: #245
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362
MALE: @180 + @182 = #362
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147
MALE: @147 = #147
GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50]
GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36,
24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]
"AND THE ANGEL OF THE LORD APPEARED UNTO HIM IN A FLAME OF FIRE OUT OF
THE MIDST OF A BUSH: AND HE LOOKED, AND, BEHOLD, THE BUSH BURNED-H1197
WITH FIRE, AND THE BUSH WAS NOT CONSUMED." [Exodus 3:2]
That we ought not contradict rationality as then the basis for a viable
value relationship that whilst they’re in a natural state it is because
law is an unnatural restraint upon them.
The principles of TERRA INCOGNITA and REX LEX are considerations which
apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse
transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.
lēx (genitive lēgis);
- a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate,
a bill
- (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
- (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner
- (figuratively) a contract, agreement, *COVENANT*
- (figuratively) a condition, stipulation
Whilst aboriginals may interact with nature, they do not have any
exquisite knowledge occasioning an expansive vocabulary about nature’s
principle of emanation as causality being the temporal attribute of the
seven day week is conformity to law of nature nor the manifesting norm
as covetous gain by the IRISH particularly.
“YE SHALL KINDLE-H1197 NO FIRE THROUGHOUT YOUR HABITATIONS UPON THE
SABBATH DAY." [Exodus 35:3]
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Heal%20Country.pdf>
Initial Draft: 6 July 2021
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 11 July, 2021
CUSTOMER FEEDBACK ON YARN INDIGENOUS CLOTHING: It suits my ONTIC (ie.
centre of circle) philosophy and so it will be a pleasure to wear it:
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: (right) Although the Wimbledon Trophy awarded to Australia's Ash
Barty on Saturday 10 JULY 2021, is named after Venus, it is a figure of
Temperance holding a wine cup that decorates the central boss. Around
this, a broad band of ornament containing four plaques with figures
represents the STOICHEION ELEMENTS air, water, earth, and fire. In oval
panels on the rim are the Seven Liberal Arts and their patron Minerva:
Grammar, Reason, Rhetoric, Music, Arithmetic, Geometry and Astrology]
#CENTRE: always was, #CIRCUMSCRIBED: always will be.
And the #205 <—> #164 intersection @ #CENTRE is both the ONTIC premise
for the origin of language and the basis (ie. EGO (NATURE) (@1 - SELF +
#491 - AGENCY: ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS) for the #421 - CAUSE OF REASON
(ie. FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS TO #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL AND #75 -
FAILURE (SHIH) DETERMINATION) as cohesion and coherence expressed by the
entirety of the syllogism being then actionable by tasks of #27 - DUTIES.
<https://www.yarn.com.au>
“AND WHO, AS I, SHALL CALL, AND SHALL DECLARE IT, AND SET IT IN ORDER
FOR ME, SINCE I APPOINTED THE ANCIENT PEOPLE?
/ #156 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 6 / 9 JULY
2021 as [#70, #6, #30, #40, #10] /
#186 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 9 JULY 2021as [#40,
#70, #6, #30, #600] / [#6, #40, #70, #30, #600] /
#192 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#6,
#40, #70, #6, #30, #600] /
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL as [#5, #30, #70, #6, #30, #40, #10, #600]
= ʻôwlâm (H5769): {UMBRA: #146 % #41 = #23} 1) long duration, antiquity,
futurity, for ever, ever, everlasting, evermore, perpetual, old,
ancient, world; 1a) ancient time, long time (of past); 1b) (of future);
1b1) for ever, always; 1b2) *CONTINUOUS* *EXISTENCE*, *PERPETUAL*; 1b3)
everlasting, indefinite or unending future, eternity;
AND THE THINGS THAT ARE COMING, AND SHALL COME, LET THEM SHEW UNTO THEM.
FEAR YE NOT, NEITHER BE AFRAID: HAVE NOT I TOLD THEE FROM THAT TIME, AND
HAVE DECLARED IT? YE ARE EVEN MY WITNESSES. IS THERE A GOD BESIDE ME?
YEA, THERE IS NO GOD; I KNOW NOT ANY.
THEY THAT MAKE A GRAVEN IMAGE ARE ALL OF THEM VANITY; AND THEIR
DELECTABLE THINGS SHALL NOT PROFIT; AND THEY ARE THEIR OWN WITNESSES;
THEY SEE NOT, NOR KNOW; THAT THEY MAY BE ASHAMED.
#73 as [#2, #1, #30, #600] = ʼêl (H410): {UMBRA: #31 % #41 = #31} 1)
god, god-like one, mighty one; 1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty
heroes; 1b) angels; 1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations); 1d) God,
the one true God, Jehovah; 2) *MIGHTY* *THINGS* *IN* *NATURE*; 3)
strength, power;
WHO HATH FORMED A GOD-ʼêl (H410), OR MOLTEN A GRAVEN IMAGE THAT IS
PROFITABLE FOR NOTHING?
BEHOLD, ALL HIS FELLOWS SHALL BE ASHAMED: AND THE WORKMEN, THEY ARE OF
MEN: LET THEM ALL BE GATHERED TOGETHER, LET THEM STAND UP; YET THEY
SHALL FEAR, AND THEY SHALL BE ASHAMED TOGETHER…” [Isaiah 44:7-11]
*FACILITATORS* / *ARBITRATORS* OF #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
[@84, {@1: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3)}
@86, {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#11); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#8)}
@84, {@3: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#22); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#11)}
@86, {@4: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#38); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#16)}
@186, {@5: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#78); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#40)}
@84, {@6: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#121); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#43)}
@86, {@7: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN
AFFAIRS {%18}); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#48)}
@84, {@8: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38});
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#51)}
@86, {@9: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#276); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#56)}
@177, {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#347); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#71)}
@84, {@11: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#421); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#74)}
@86, {@12: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#500); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#79)}
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
@200, {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
@186, {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
@84, {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
@86, {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224)}
@177, {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239)}
@140] {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU
(#298)}
To the Hebrews the “dot within the circle” is the keṯer "Crown" also
known as Kether, which is the topmost of the sephirot of the Tree of
Life in Kabbalah. Since its meaning is "crown", it is interpreted as
both the "topmost" of the Sephirot and the "regal crown" of the Sephirot.
The first Sephirah is called the Crown, since a crown is worn above the
head. The Crown therefore refers to things that are above the mind's
abilities of comprehension. All of the other Sephirot are likened to the
body which starts with the head and winds its way down into action. But
the crown of a king lies above the head and connects the concept of
"monarchy", which is abstract and intangible, with the tangible and
concrete head of the king.
NOUMENON EXTENT ON RIGHTS: SUPERNAL: #561 - HEAD (OF A MAN) / ISRAEL,
EGO: #592 - THEÓTĒS (GODHEAD) [Colossians 2:9]
<https://www.grapple369.com/?zen:8,row:7,col:3>
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 7, col: 3, nous: 69 [DATE: (none), TIME: (none),
SUPER: #533 / #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 -
Resolution, Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION (YI), EGO: #592 / #69 - Profound Use, Function of the
Mysterious; I-Ching: H34 - Great Strength, Great Invigorating, The power
of the great, Great maturity; Tetra: 22 - RESISTANCE (KE)]
TELOS / ONTIC HIERARCHY FOR #561
[@171, {@1: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT:
SHU (#9)}
@156, {@2: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#12); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#84 - I
AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2})}
@200, {@3: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#53); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#122)}
@157] {@4: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#89); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU
(#198)}
TELOS TOTAL: #684
FEME: @84 = #84
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #84
GRUMBLE (#89, #198)@[9, 9, 3, 75, 41, 38, 36, 76]
#89 as [#30, #3, #6, #10, #600] = gôwy (H1471): {UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19}
1) nation, people; 1a) nation, people; 1a1) usually of non-Hebrew
people; 1a2) of descendants of Abraham; 1a3) of Israel; 1b) of swarm of
locusts, other animals (fig.); 1c) Goyim? = 'nations';
#89 as [#6, #8, #20, #40, #10, #5] = châkâm (H2450): {UMBRA: #68 % #41 =
#27} 1) wise, wise (man); 1a) skilful (in technical work); 1b) wise (in
administration); 1c) shrewd, crafty, cunning, wily, subtle; 1d) learned,
shrewd (class of men); 1e) prudent; 1f) wise (ethically and religiously);
#160 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#40,
#40, #6, #70, #4] /
#192 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#2,
#40, #6, #70, #4, #10, #20, #600] /
#198 as [#6, #2, #40, #6, #70, #4, #10, #20, #600] = môwʻêd (H4150):
{UMBRA: #120 % #41 = #38} 1) appointed place, appointed time, meeting;
1a) appointed time; 1a1) appointed time (general); 1a2) sacred season,
set feast, appointed season; 1b) appointed meeting; 1c) appointed place;
1d) appointed sign or signal; 1e) tent of meeting;
GRUNTLE (#225, #287)@[9, 9, 18, 9, 21, 3, 15, 75, 56, 41, 13, 38, 49,
36, 44, 76]
#225 as [#1, #4, #10, #200, #10] = ʼaddîyr (H117): {UMBRA: #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) great, majestic; 1a) of waters of sea; 1b) of a tree; 1c) of
kings, nations, gods; 2) great one, majestic one; 2a) of nobles,
chieftains, servants;
#225 as [#5, #3, #2, #10, #200, #5] = gᵉbîyrâh (H1377): {UMBRA: #220 %
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
#234 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#6,
#1, #7, #20, #200] /
#253 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#10,
#7, #20, #10, #200, #6] /
#285 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#2,
#7, #20, #200, #50, #6] /
#287 as [#7, #20, #200, #50, #10] / [#50, #7, #20, #10, #200] = zâkar
(H2142): {UMBRA: #227 % #41 = #22} 1) to remember, recall, call to mind;
1a) (Qal) to remember, recall; 1b) (Niphal) to be brought to
remembrance, be remembered, be thought of, be brought to mind; 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to cause to remember, remind; 1c2) to cause to be
remembered, keep in remembrance; 1c3) to mention; 1c4) to record; 1c5)
to make a memorial, make remembrance;
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/ProtoHumanHand.jpg>
This first Sefirah represents the primal stirrings of intent in the Ein
Soph (infinity), or the arousal of desire to come forth into the varied
life of being. But in this sense, although it contains all the potential
for content, it contains no content itself, and is therefore called
'Nothing', 'The Hidden Light', 'The air that cannot be grasped'. Being
desire to bring the world into being, Keter is absolute compassion.
YOUTUBE: "Phil Collins - In The Air Tonight LIVE HD"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeDMnyQzS88>
The name of God associated with Keter is Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh (Hebrew: אהיה
אשר אהיה), the name {ie.
"I am who I am,"
"I will become what I choose to become,"
"I am what I am,"
"I will be what I will be,"
"I create what(ever) I create," or
"I am the Existing One."
The traditional English translation within Judaism favours "I will be
what I will be" because there is no present tense of the verb "to be" in
the Hebrew language
} through which he revealed himself to Moses from the burning bush. "It
is from the name Ehyeh that all kinds of sustenance emanate, coming from
the source, which is the infinite".
[א,ה,י,ה ,א,ש,ר ,א,ה,י,ה]
[א, {@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1)}
ה, {@2: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#7); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#6)}
י, {@3: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#23); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#16)}
ה , {@4: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#44); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#21)}
א, {@5: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#66); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#22)}
ש, {@6: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#145); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU
(#79)}
ר , {@7: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO
THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
{%35}); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#117)}
א, {@8: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#218); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#118)}
ה, {@9: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#260); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#123)}
י, {@10: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#312); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#133)}
ה] {@11: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#369); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#138)}
TELOS TOTAL: #543
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #181
MALE: @181 = #181
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #235
FEME: @117 + @118 = #235
GRUMBLE (#369, #138)@[1, 1, 6, 5, 16, 10, 21, 5, 22, 1, 79, 57, 36, 38,
37, 1, 42, 5, 52, 10, 57, 5]
#313 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 6 JULY 2021 as
[#300, #1, #2, #10] /
#325 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#6,
#10, #300, #1, #2, #6] /
#333 - ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #FIVE / #CENTRE as [#30, #300, #1, #2] /
#369 as [#10, #300, #1, #2, #6, #700] = shâʼab (H7579): {UMBRA: #303 %
#41 = #16} 1) to draw (water); 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to draw (water); 1a2)
water-drawing women (participle);
#369 as [#80, #30, #1, #50, #8, #200] = plánē (G4106): {UMBRA: #169 %
#41 = #5} 1) a wandering, a straying about; 1a) one led astray from the
right way, roams hither and thither; 2) metaph.; 2a) mental straying;
2a1) error, wrong opinion relative to morals or religion; 2b) error
which shows itself in action, a wrong mode of acting; 2c) error, that
which leads into error, deceit or fraud;
#424 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 6 JULY 2021 as [#5,
#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #50] /
#175 - CONSTITUTE, #176 - ORDER, #177 - DECLARE as [#80, #70, #10, #5,
#10] /
#374 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#5,
#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1] /
#369 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] = poiéō
(G4160): {UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of
things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the
authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce,
bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self;
1f) to make a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one
anything; 1g1) to (make i.e.) constitute or appoint one anything, to
appoint or ordain one that; 1g2) to (make i.e.) declare one anything;
1h) to put one forth, to lead him out; 1i) to make one do something;
1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors of a thing (to cause, bring
about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well; 2a1) to carry out, to
execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one; 2c) with
designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate, keep; 2d1) to
make ready, and so at the same time to institute, the celebration of the
passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
#88 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#8,
#30, #40, #10] /
#138 as [#8, #30, #40, #10, #700] = chêlem (H2493): {UMBRA: #78 % #41 =
#37} 1) dream;
#113 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE ON 7 JULY 2021 as [#5,
#8, #40, #60] /
#138 as [#30, #8, #40, #60] = châmâç (H2555): {UMBRA: #108 % #41 = #26}
1) violence, wrong, cruelty, injustice;
The Dreaming, also referred to as Dreamtime, is a term devised by early
anthropologists to refer to a religio-cultural worldview attributed to
Australian Aboriginal beliefs.
YOUTUBE: “Fleetwood Mac - Dreams”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuL8-8xm4QU>
The Dreaming is used to represent Aboriginal concepts of Everywhen
during which the land was inhabited by ancestral figures, often of
heroic proportions or with supernatural abilities.
The word ‘everywhen’ is usually collocated with everywhere in the phrase
everywhere and everywhen, where it often denotes continuous existence or
inexistence in time and space (ie. always, at all times as the infinity)
, and as such, it is commonly found in theological and spiritual contexts.
These figures were often distinct from gods as they did not control the
material world and were not worshipped, but only revered. The concept of
the Dreamtime has subsequently become widely adopted beyond its original
Australian context and is now part of global popular culture. [ref:
Wikipedia]
GRUNTLE (#612, #507)@[1, 1, 2, 1, 8, 6, 13, 5, 29, 16, 39, 10, 60, 21,
65, 5, 6, 22, 7, 1, 5, 79, 62, 57, 17, 36, 55, 38, 11, 37, 12, 1, 54,
42, 59, 5, 30, 52, 40, 10, 16, 57, 21, 5]
#612 as [#6, #30, #40, #6, #80, #400, #10, #600] = môwphêth (H4159):
{UMBRA: #526 % #41 = #34} 1) wonder, sign, miracle, portent; 1a) wonder
(as a special display of God's power); 1b) sign, token (of future event);
#612 as [#2, #200, #10, #400] / [#2, #200, #400, #10] = bᵉrîyth (H1285):
{UMBRA: #612 % #41 = #38} 1) *COVENANT*, *ALLIANCE*, *PLEDGE*; 1a)
between men; 1a1) treaty, alliance, league (man to man); 1a2)
constitution, ordinance (monarch to subjects); 1a3) agreement, pledge
(man to man); 1a4) alliance (of friendship); 1a5) alliance (of
marriage); 1b) between God and man; 1b1) alliance (of friendship); 1b2)
covenant (divine ordinance with signs or pledges); 1c) (phrases); 1c1)
covenant making; 1c2) covenant keeping; 1c3) covenant violation;
#507 as [#6, #40, #30, #20, #6, #400, #5] = malkûwth (H4438): {UMBRA:
#496 % #41 = #4} 1) royalty, royal power, reign, kingdom, sovereign
power; 1a) royal power, dominion; 1b) reign; 1c) kingdom, realm;
#507 as [#5, #2, #300, #200] / [#2, #300, #200, #5] = bâsâr (H1320):
{UMBRA: #502 % #41 = #10} 1) flesh; 1a) of the body; 1a1) of humans;
1a2) of animals; 1b) the body itself; 1c) male organ of generation
(euphemism); 1d) kindred, blood-relations; 1e) flesh as frail or erring
(man against God); 1f) all living things; 1g) animals; 1h) mankind;
Keter, although being the highest Sephirah of its world, receives from
the Sephirah of Malkuth of the domain above it (see Sephirot). The
uppermost Keter sits below no other Sephirah, although it is below Or
Ein Soph which is the source of all Sephirot. [Source: Wikipedia]
"GOD THAT MADE THE WORLD AND ALL THINGS THEREIN, SEEING THAT HE IS LORD
OF HEAVEN AND EARTH, DWELLETH NOT IN TEMPLES MADE WITH HANDS; NEITHER IS
WORSHIPPED WITH MEN'S HANDS, AS THOUGH HE NEEDED ANY THING, SEEING HE
GIVETH TO ALL LIFE, AND BREATH, AND ALL THINGS; AND HATH MADE OF ONE
BLOOD ALL NATIONS OF MEN FOR TO DWELL ON ALL THE FACE OF THE EARTH, AND
HATH DETERMINED THE TIMES BEFORE APPOINTED, AND THE BOUNDS OF THEIR
HABITATION; THAT THEY SHOULD SEEK THE LORD, IF HAPLY THEY MIGHT FEEL
AFTER HIM, AND FIND HIM, THOUGH HE BE NOT FAR FROM EVERY ONE OF US: FOR
IN HIM WE LIVE, AND MOVE, AND HAVE OUR BEING; AS CERTAIN ALSO OF YOUR
OWN POETS HAVE SAID, FOR WE ARE ALSO HIS OFFSPRING.
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1783) PROLEGOMENA COMMENTARY ON SECTION #13 - STATUS,
LOATHING SHAME; I-CHING: H5 - WAITING, DELAY, ATTENDING, MOISTENED,
ARRIVING; TETRA: 17 - HOLDING BACK (JUAN) AS IDEA @294: "Since I
therefore grant their reality to the things that we represent to
ourselves through the senses, and limit our sensory intuition of these
things only to the extent that in no instance whatsoever, not even in
the pure intuitions of space and time, does it represent anything more
than mere appearances of these things, and never their quality in
themselves, this is therefore no thorough-going illusion ascribed by me
to nature, and my protestation against all imputation of idealism is so
conclusive and clear that it would even seem superfluous if there were
not *UNAUTHORIZED* *JUDGES* who, being glad to have an *ANCIENT* *NAME*
*FOR* *EVERY* *DEVIATION* *FROM* *THEIR* *FALSE* *THOUGH* *COMMON*
*OPINION*, and never judging the spirit of philosophical nomenclatures
but merely clinging to the letter, were ready to put their own folly in
the place of well-determined concepts, and thereby to twist and deform
them.
...
For what I called idealism did not concern the existence of things (the
doubting of which, however, properly constitutes idealism according to
the received meaning), for it never came into my mind to doubt that, but
only the sensory representation of things, to which space and time above
all belong; and about these last, hence in general about all
appearances, I have only shown: that they are not things (but mere ways
of representing), nor are they determinations that belong to things in
themselves.
The word transcendental, however, which with me never signifies a
relation of our cognition to things, but only to the faculty of
cognition, was intended to prevent this misinterpretation. But before it
prompts still more of the same, I gladly withdraw this name, and I will
have it called critical idealism.
But if it is an in fact reprehensible idealism to transform actual
things (not appearances) into mere representations, with what name shall
we christen that idealism which, conversely, makes mere representations
into things?
I think it could be named *DREAMING* idealism, to distinguish it from
the preceding, which may be called visionary idealism, both of which
were to have been held off by my formerly so-called transcendental, or
better, critical idealism." [pages 44 to 45]
#294 as [#9, #5, #70, #10, #200] = theós (G2316): {UMBRA: #284 % #41 =
#38} 1) a god or goddess, a general name of deities or divinities; 2)
the Godhead, trinity; 2a) God the Father, the first person in the
trinity; 2b) Christ, the second person of the trinity; 2c) Holy Spirit,
the third person in the trinity; 3) spoken of the only and true God; 3a)
refers to the things of God; 3b) his counsels, interests, things due to
him; 4) whatever can in any respect be likened unto God, or resemble him
in any way; 4a) God's representative or viceregent; 4a1) of magistrates
and judges;
FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD- theós (G2316) IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE,
GRAVEN BY ART AND MAN'S DEVICE. AND THE TIMES OF THIS IGNORANCE GOD
WINKED AT; BUT NOW COMMANDETH ALL MEN EVERY WHERE TO REPENT: BECAUSE HE
HATH APPOINTED A DAY, IN THE WHICH HE WILL *JUDGE* THE WORLD IN
RIGHTEOUSNESS BY THAT MAN WHOM HE HATH ORDAINED; WHEREOF HE HATH GIVEN
ASSURANCE UNTO ALL MEN, IN THAT HE HATH RAISED HIM FROM THE DEAD." [Acts
17:24-31]
THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF
DEVELOPMENT
I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract by Todd E. Feinberg and
Jon Mallatt: "Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the
Explanatory Gap".
ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has
been debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In
particular there is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or
radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.
THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then
impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle for
emergence of consciousness.
In that paper they use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the
emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three
progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems),
and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately
leading to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical
systems.
THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet
basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 / 7 then the central
unifying principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 -
formula of progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 +
METALOGIC #8 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x 8
TWO INSTANCE MODELS OF @168 - ONTIC CONSCIOUSNESS EMERGENCE
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
#501 - SECTION I OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT / #82 - TERMS OF
COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as [#1, #300, #200] /
#517 as [#6, #1, #300, #200, #10] = ʼesher (H835): {UMBRA: #501 % #41 =
#9} 1) happiness, blessedness; 1a) often used as interjection; 1b)
blessed are;
#511 as [#5, #90, #10, #400, #6] / [#6, #5, #90, #400, #10] /
#551 - SECTION III OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as [#6, #50, #90,
#400, #5] = yâtsath (H3341): {UMBRA: #500 % #41 = #8} 1) to kindle,
burn, set on fire; 1a) (Qal) to kindle; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be
kindled; 1b2) to be left desolate; 1c) (Hiphil) *TO* *SET* *ON* *FIRE*,
*KINDLE*;
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6]
#333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200,
#5] /
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
#362 - *SEE* *BELOW* *FOR* *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200,
#10, #600] = bâʻar (H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn,
consume, kindle, be kindled; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *BEGIN* *TO* *BURN*,
*BE* *KINDLED*, *START* *BURNING*; 1a2) to burn, be burning; 1a3) to
burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath (fig.); 1b) (Piel);
1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of guilt) (fig.); 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to consume (destroy);
1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous; 2a) (Qal) to be
stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be stupid,
dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to be
grazed over;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{ @1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 -
ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26), @2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 -
DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92), @3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego:
19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#111), @4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73);
Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}), Male: #73; Feme: #168 } // #168
Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an
emergent property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation
Life + Special neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness
expresses these relationships. Then we consider the implications of our
findings for some of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the
apparent “explanatory gap” between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.
TERRA INCOGNITIA: That is the giving of names to places is an
encapsulation: 21 x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied a resonance
against rationalty: 24 x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that
consciousness requires some #5 - stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse
transcriptase) for its function as #369 - discriminating norm:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
We conclude that consciousness stems from the personal life (ie.
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its
noumenon: 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF and the #728 - MORPHOS)
of an organism with the addition of a complex nervous system that is
ideally suited to maximize emergent neurobiological features and that it
is an example of standard (“weak”) emergence without a scientific
explanatory gap. An “experiential” or epistemic gap remains, although
this is ontologically untroubling.
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304239/>
The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a
lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
(lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós,
“of words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω
(légō, “to speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to
gather, collect”).
[λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION:
YI (#30)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#35)}
ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#95)}
ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#105)}
κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)}
ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN
MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}
TELOS TOTAL: #245
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362
MALE: @180 + @182 = #362
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147
MALE: @147 = #147
GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50]
GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36,
24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]
"AND THE ANGEL OF THE LORD APPEARED UNTO HIM IN A FLAME OF FIRE OUT OF
THE MIDST OF A BUSH: AND HE LOOKED, AND, BEHOLD, THE BUSH BURNED-H1197
WITH FIRE, AND THE BUSH WAS NOT CONSUMED." [Exodus 3:2]
That we ought not contradict rationality as then the basis for a viable
value relationship that whilst they’re in a natural state it is because
law is an unnatural restraint upon them.
The principles of TERRA INCOGNITA and REX LEX are considerations which
apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse
transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.
lēx (genitive lēgis);
- a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate,
a bill
- (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
- (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner
- (figuratively) a contract, agreement, *COVENANT*
- (figuratively) a condition, stipulation
Whilst aboriginals may interact with nature, they do not have any
exquisite knowledge occasioning an expansive vocabulary about nature’s
principle of emanation as causality being the temporal attribute of the
seven day week is conformity to law of nature nor the manifesting norm
as covetous gain by the IRISH particularly.
“YE SHALL KINDLE-H1197 NO FIRE THROUGHOUT YOUR HABITATIONS UPON THE
SABBATH DAY." [Exodus 35:3]
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Heal%20Country.pdf>
Initial Draft: 6 July 2021
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
Jul 30, 2021, 10:04:45 PM7/30/21
to
.jackNote@zen: 3, row: 4, col: 4, nous: 40 [DATE: 2021.7.30, SUPER: #475
/ #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence;
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on
what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - ENDEAVOUR
(WU), EGO: #401 / #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking / Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - DIMMING (MENG)]
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATIONS ON DEUS VULT (BATTLE CRY: GOD WILLS IT) #71 -
MITHRAISM: #65 - SOLDIER CULTUS OF THE IMPERIUM (MORALLY WRONG:
*UNLAWFUL* / *SEDITIOUS*) v's DIEU ET MON DROIT (BATTLE CRY: GOD AND MY
RIGHT) #71 - WORLDVIEW OF THE SOVEREIGN AND LETTERS PATENT AS #940 -
PRESERVATION OF MIND
Following on from our 21 JULY 2021 written advice to the COURT and
POLICE PROSECUTIONS within these protracted matters which have been in
entirety adjourned for a SPECIAL MENTION HEARING upon the 10 AUGUST 2021.
We made the statement therein "...that the Christchurch massacre of 51
persons advocated an Australian nationalism as being by nature Irish
republicanism (he received a blessing from the knight Templars as a
renewed Catholic religious military order). TARRANT'S MANIFESTO EMAILED
TO ARDERN, page 9 of 73 states of the in situ "terrorist attack" which
was live broadcast that although not ordered by any group as a decision
TARRANT made himself, he 'DID CONTACT THE REBORN KNIGHTS TEMPLAR FOR A
BLESSING IN SUPPORT OF THE ATTACK, WHICH WAS GIVEN.'
We had SIPHONED several images (that we provided as grounds for appeal)
on 4 NOVEMBER 2017 from a FACEBOOK page purporting to be the KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL as a UK based religious organisation launched
around 21 JANUARY 2015 (ie. the year is confirmed in the ABOUT SECTION
of the enclosed FACEBOOK page) and before they went private or were
removed, which conveys a clear intention to both associate this
organisation with the ecclesiastical calendar and the ANZAC centennial
of 2018.
We also enclose a 27 JULY 2021 media statement relevant to the
defamation proceedings before the COURTS in relation to the former
special forces soldier Ben Roberts-Smith displaying a contentious
Crusader’s cross on his uniform whilst on duty in Afghanistan, with the
symbol later digitally removed by the Department of Defence in a widely
distributed photo of the decorated war veteran around January 2011.
Australia Defence Association executive director Neil James said
displaying the symbol was “WRONG MORALLY” AND “COUNTERPRODUCTIVE”.
Whilst the symbol dates back to the 11th and 12th centuries when the
Crusaders captured parts of the Middle East from Muslim control, it is
unknown to ourselves whether the symbol was worn to only convey "one's
skill in soldiering" or that the former special forces soldier was ever
a member of such international organisation.
A spokesperson for Defence said it “does not condone or permit the use,
display or adoption of symbols, emblems and iconography that are at odds
with Defence values” [and their oath of faithful service and allegiance
to Queen Elizabeth II]. Displaying symbols such as the Crusader’s cross
or Spartan-style insignia was widespread within the ADF at the time the
photo was taken. In 2018, then-Chief of Army General Angus Campbell
issued a directive to commanders that they should stamp out all
instances of “death symbology and iconography”.
As we had conveyed within our 21 JULY 2021 correspondence that [at] the
time of my arrest after attendance at the BOER WAR MEMORIAL for an
alleged breach of CASE NUMBER: H13018534 on 11 NOVEMBER 2017, the sworn
statement by INSPECTOR SCOTT BRENNAN REGN: 24929 fails to record that
the persons present had repeatedly refused to respond to my unambiguous
QUESTION repeated THREE times, whether he or the RETURNED SERVICES
LEAGUE were either DIRECTLY / INDIRECTLY associated to the KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL WHICH IN MY VIEW IS AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AS
BEING NEO-FASCIST WITHIN ITS COMPOSITION.
Accordingly we hope that the COURT come to some sensibly that in such
circumstance these present matters have no justiciability and ought to
be struck out and costs awarded for damages and the tens of thousands
pages of correspondence necessary to establish our defence and substance
of an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY claim.
-----------
ENCLOSURES:
NEWS ARTICLE: "‘WRONG MORALLY’: OFFICIAL PHOTO OF BEN ROBERTS-SMITH WAS
ALTERED TO HIDE CRUSADER’S CROSS"
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Morally%20Wrong.pdf>
SIPHONED IMAGES: "KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL FACEBOOK PAGE ON 4
NOVEMBER 2017"
<https://www.grapple369.com/Fascist%20(Knights%20Templar%20International)/>
/ #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence;
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on
what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - ENDEAVOUR
(WU), EGO: #401 / #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking / Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - DIMMING (MENG)]
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATIONS ON DEUS VULT (BATTLE CRY: GOD WILLS IT) #71 -
MITHRAISM: #65 - SOLDIER CULTUS OF THE IMPERIUM (MORALLY WRONG:
*UNLAWFUL* / *SEDITIOUS*) v's DIEU ET MON DROIT (BATTLE CRY: GOD AND MY
RIGHT) #71 - WORLDVIEW OF THE SOVEREIGN AND LETTERS PATENT AS #940 -
PRESERVATION OF MIND
Following on from our 21 JULY 2021 written advice to the COURT and
POLICE PROSECUTIONS within these protracted matters which have been in
entirety adjourned for a SPECIAL MENTION HEARING upon the 10 AUGUST 2021.
We made the statement therein "...that the Christchurch massacre of 51
persons advocated an Australian nationalism as being by nature Irish
republicanism (he received a blessing from the knight Templars as a
renewed Catholic religious military order). TARRANT'S MANIFESTO EMAILED
TO ARDERN, page 9 of 73 states of the in situ "terrorist attack" which
was live broadcast that although not ordered by any group as a decision
TARRANT made himself, he 'DID CONTACT THE REBORN KNIGHTS TEMPLAR FOR A
BLESSING IN SUPPORT OF THE ATTACK, WHICH WAS GIVEN.'
We had SIPHONED several images (that we provided as grounds for appeal)
on 4 NOVEMBER 2017 from a FACEBOOK page purporting to be the KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL as a UK based religious organisation launched
around 21 JANUARY 2015 (ie. the year is confirmed in the ABOUT SECTION
of the enclosed FACEBOOK page) and before they went private or were
removed, which conveys a clear intention to both associate this
organisation with the ecclesiastical calendar and the ANZAC centennial
of 2018.
We also enclose a 27 JULY 2021 media statement relevant to the
defamation proceedings before the COURTS in relation to the former
special forces soldier Ben Roberts-Smith displaying a contentious
Crusader’s cross on his uniform whilst on duty in Afghanistan, with the
symbol later digitally removed by the Department of Defence in a widely
distributed photo of the decorated war veteran around January 2011.
Australia Defence Association executive director Neil James said
displaying the symbol was “WRONG MORALLY” AND “COUNTERPRODUCTIVE”.
Whilst the symbol dates back to the 11th and 12th centuries when the
Crusaders captured parts of the Middle East from Muslim control, it is
unknown to ourselves whether the symbol was worn to only convey "one's
skill in soldiering" or that the former special forces soldier was ever
a member of such international organisation.
A spokesperson for Defence said it “does not condone or permit the use,
display or adoption of symbols, emblems and iconography that are at odds
with Defence values” [and their oath of faithful service and allegiance
to Queen Elizabeth II]. Displaying symbols such as the Crusader’s cross
or Spartan-style insignia was widespread within the ADF at the time the
photo was taken. In 2018, then-Chief of Army General Angus Campbell
issued a directive to commanders that they should stamp out all
instances of “death symbology and iconography”.
As we had conveyed within our 21 JULY 2021 correspondence that [at] the
time of my arrest after attendance at the BOER WAR MEMORIAL for an
alleged breach of CASE NUMBER: H13018534 on 11 NOVEMBER 2017, the sworn
statement by INSPECTOR SCOTT BRENNAN REGN: 24929 fails to record that
the persons present had repeatedly refused to respond to my unambiguous
QUESTION repeated THREE times, whether he or the RETURNED SERVICES
LEAGUE were either DIRECTLY / INDIRECTLY associated to the KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL WHICH IN MY VIEW IS AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AS
BEING NEO-FASCIST WITHIN ITS COMPOSITION.
Accordingly we hope that the COURT come to some sensibly that in such
circumstance these present matters have no justiciability and ought to
be struck out and costs awarded for damages and the tens of thousands
pages of correspondence necessary to establish our defence and substance
of an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY claim.
-----------
ENCLOSURES:
NEWS ARTICLE: "‘WRONG MORALLY’: OFFICIAL PHOTO OF BEN ROBERTS-SMITH WAS
ALTERED TO HIDE CRUSADER’S CROSS"
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Morally%20Wrong.pdf>
SIPHONED IMAGES: "KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL FACEBOOK PAGE ON 4
NOVEMBER 2017"
<https://www.grapple369.com/Fascist%20(Knights%20Templar%20International)/>
dolf
Aug 24, 2021, 10:17:37 PM8/24/21
to
REMEMBERING THE FARHUD: “Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible over 500
times, it is NEVER mentioned in the Quran, not once!”
DOLF: Jerusalem and the temple is mentioned in the book of Jubilees as
base-7 time divisions in relation to an exegesis of the 10 Commandments and
genealogy.
Thus the statement: “Have you offered me slain beasts the space of 40 years
oh house of Israel…” [cf: Hosea, Acts]
The background geometric image is the "Flower of Life" from ABYDOS which is
971 km away from Jerusalem.
The "Star of David" geometric image was known to Pythagoras during
Babylonian captivity some 871 km away from Jerusalem.
Is irrefutable proof that “Jerusalem and the temple” is Jewish as #509 -
YAHAD.
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Kabbalistic_Circle.jpg>
"I shall carry you beyond Babylon." [Acts 7:43]
Initial Post: 24 August 2021
times, it is NEVER mentioned in the Quran, not once!”
DOLF: Jerusalem and the temple is mentioned in the book of Jubilees as
base-7 time divisions in relation to an exegesis of the 10 Commandments and
genealogy.
Thus the statement: “Have you offered me slain beasts the space of 40 years
oh house of Israel…” [cf: Hosea, Acts]
The background geometric image is the "Flower of Life" from ABYDOS which is
971 km away from Jerusalem.
The "Star of David" geometric image was known to Pythagoras during
Babylonian captivity some 871 km away from Jerusalem.
Is irrefutable proof that “Jerusalem and the temple” is Jewish as #509 -
YAHAD.
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Kabbalistic_Circle.jpg>
"I shall carry you beyond Babylon." [Acts 7:43]
Initial Post: 24 August 2021
dolf
Aug 24, 2021, 10:32:47 PM8/24/21
to
REMEMBERING THE FARHUD: “Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible over 500
times, it is NEVER mentioned in the Quran, not once!”
DOLF: Jerusalem and the temple is mentioned in the book of Jubilees as
base-7 time divisions in relation to an exegesis of the 10 Commandments and
genealogy.
“Then the king (Ahasuerus which reigned, from India even unto Ethiopia,
times, it is NEVER mentioned in the Quran, not once!”
DOLF: Jerusalem and the temple is mentioned in the book of Jubilees as
base-7 time divisions in relation to an exegesis of the 10 Commandments and
genealogy.
over an hundred and seven and twenty provinces) said to the wise men, which
knew the *TIMES*, (for so [was] the king's manner toward all that knew law
and judgment…” [Esther 1:13 (KJV)]
dolf
Aug 26, 2021, 8:43:49 PM8/26/21
to
-- (DRAFT) METHODOLOGICAL SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS
STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2021
Before we continue with the implementation of our noetic lexicon
navigation within the GRUMBLE prototype, we ought to ought to make self
educated appraisal of a research chapter from the International Journal
of Technoethics and a scholarly book so as to make an accommodation of
ideas expressed therein and as syncretism progress my own semantics of
experience:
- The Technoethical Ethos of Technic Self-Deterimination by Francesco A.
B. Cortese (2016)
- The Electromagnetic Brain by Shelli Joye (2020)
As introduction we find on pages 5 & 6 this comment relevant to our
*ONTIC* understanding of @1 - SELF, #492 - FREEWILL and #491 - AGENCY
(ie. @84, @86, @102, @104, @115)
Cortese (2016) says "Our position implicit within the thesis of this
paper falls within compatibilism. Indeed, we contend that freewill is
not only compatible with determinism – but that determinism is actually
a necessary precondition for free will (which we will use synonymously
in this paper with autonomy and self- determination).
...
If such means of partial determination (and thus of partial
self-determination) WERE AVAILABLE DURING THE *MILLENNIA* (as especially
two) IN WHICH THE SEEMING INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN FREE WILL AND CAUSAL
DETERMINISM BECAME ENTRENCHED WITHIN THE WESTERN PHILOSOPHICAL
TRADITION, then it is likely that the dilemma of determinism wouldn't
have posed such an unquestionable affront to the *ONTIC* legitimacy of
our autonomy and agency."
Causal determinism is, roughly speaking, the idea that every event is
necessitated by antecedent events and conditions together with the laws
of nature:
CONCEPTUAL ISSUES IN DETERMINISM
2.1 The World (kosmos)
2.2 The way things are at a time
2.3 Thereafter
2.4 Laws of nature
2.5 Fixed
Fixed determinism requires a world that (a) has a well-defined state or
description, at any given time, and (b) laws of nature that are true at
all places and times. If we have all these, then if (a) and (b) together
logically entail the state of the world at all other times (or, at
least, all times later than that given in (a)), the world is
deterministic. Logical entailment, in a sense broad enough to encompass
mathematical consequence, is the modality behind the determination in
“determinism.” <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal>
The idea is ancient, but first became subject to clarification and
mathematical analysis in the eighteenth century.
Towards that end, we are currently at the vCognition vantage point of
the GRAPPLE HEURISTIC@[21,43,60,65,66,69,71,72,81] considering the
NOETIC LEXICON COGNITION {IDEA #206 AS #THREE / #342 AS #FOUR -
PYTHAGOREAN ONOMANTIC PROTOTYPE #SIX - ROMAN / #FIVE - TORAH} and our
intention is to then evolve the visualization as each of these LEXICON /
NOETIC concepts of "GOD THE CENTRE OF VALUE THEORY WITHIN THEOLOGY"
within the sectarian #71 - WORLDVIEW of either or collectively:
⁃ ALLAHU AKBAR (God is Great)
⁃ DEUS VULT (God wills it)
⁃ DIEU ET MON DROIT (God and my right)
By such notions as STRONGS reference dârash (H1875): {UMBRA: #504 % #41
= #12} 1a2) *TO* *CONSULT*, *ENQUIRE* *OF*, *SEEK*; i) *OF* *GOD*;
<div>
<span name="0">H1875</span>
</div>
In whatsoever manner available:
H1875 (דרשנו):
which is infinitely expandable."
Whereas the result having four {value: [70, 10, 5, 57], position: [5, 6,
7, 3], type: 128} of nine grapple [] array value elements by an
COINRULES.library.intersectGrappleArray([2, 70, 10, 71, 9, 8, 38, 5,
57], [4, 4, 81, 57, 55, 70, 10, 5, 72]) action ought to convey some
sensibility to us that the values array: [70, 10, 5, 57] were matched
within positions [5, 6, 7, 3] and were a sequential match within nous #5
- KEEPING SMALL (SHAO) being position 7 of the grapple [] array.
The philosophical consideration on "#902 - AUTOS + #68 - RIGHTS {#33,
#17, #18} = #970 - NOMOS" is an exemplar concern for HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY.
Cortese (2016, p 3) in agreeing with others (Smart and Haldane, 2003)
rejects the indeterminist notion that our immersive interoperability
within the world (kosmos) is subject to a "QUANTUM MECHANICAL TRIGGER"
which motivates our freedom towards any will to action.
Although Cortese (2016, p 14) considers that writing can be categorized
as technique he asserts that without the technological infrastructure of
something to write with and something to write on, one would be
hard-pressed to employ it.
My concern with such a notion is that the objects of perception are here
written words as Cortese's chapter on Technic Self-Determination to be
precise with the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC at the time of reading and
contemplation:
INSTANTIATED @ 1510 HOURS ON 23 AUGUST 2021 GIVES TEMPORAL HEURISTIC AS
GRAPPLE@[#78, #71, #7, #40, #25, #18, #10, #19, #61] PROTOTYPE:
#THREE: #126 as #45 - GREATNESS (TA)
#FOUR: #203 as #41 - RESPONSE (YING)
#FIVE: #329 as #5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO
#327 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 AUGUST 2021 as
[#3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] /
#770 as [#3, #100, #1, #500, #70, #40, #5, #50, #1] = gráphō (G1125):
{UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with reference to the form of
the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) letters on a tablet, parchment,
paper, or other material; 2) to write, with reference to the contents of
the writing; 2a) to express in written characters; 2b) to commit to
writing (things not to be forgotten), write down, record; 2c) used of
those things which stand written in the sacred books (of the OT); 2d) to
write to one, i.e. by writing (in a written epistle) to give
information, directions; 3) to fill with writing; 4) to draw up in
writing, compose;
Fixed determinism requires a world that (a) has a well-defined state or
description, at any given time, and (b) laws of nature that are true at
all places and times. However Kant within idea @225 of his Prolegomena
(1783) suggests that time in itself cannot be perceived: "All
appearances are in time, in which, as substratum (as the persisting form
of inner intuition), simultaneous existence as well as succession can
alone be represented. Therefore time, in which every change in the
appearances is to be thought, remains and does not change; for in it
alone can successive or simultaneous existence be represented, as its
determinations. Now time in itself cannot be perceived.
Consequently, in the objects of perception, i.e., in the appearances, a
substratum must be found that represents time in general and in which
all change or simultaneous existence can be perceived through the
relation of the appearances to it in apprehension. But substance – the
substratum of everything real, i.e., of everything belonging to the
existence of things – is that in which every- thing that belongs to
existence can be thought only as a determination. Consequently, that
which persists – in relation to which alone all time- relations of the
appearances can be determined – is the substance in the appearances,
i.e., the real in them, which as the substratum of all change remains
always the same. Since this therefore cannot change in existence, its
quantum in nature can also be neither increased nor diminished. [p 183]
As we explore this chapter further, we'll need to consider whether a
noumenon based "quantum mechanical trigger" is a self-modulating
characteristic to "an ontology of self-determination".
Cortese (2016, p 3) further states that the dichotomy of determinism as
a false free-will dilemma was engendered for millennia and established
within the western philosophical as perennial tradition.
And this we have explained is probably due to the basis of that
dogmatism as perennial school of thinking having a foundational reliance
upon the STOICHEION elements as #45 - METHODOLOGY of RELIGIONISTS and
which is dogmatically (ie. whether #1827 - Eucharist or Hajj as purposed
life) and existentially #5 - centred upon the #9 - PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY
as an institutional basis for its economy, in that it thereby conveys an
extrusion of being having an inherent antagonism (ie. WEAK-asthenḗs
(G772) and BEGGARLY-ptōchós (G4434) ELEMENTS-stoicheîon (G4747)):
ENHANCER OR SUBJUGATOR?
#1 #2 #3
#8 #9 #4
#7 #6 #5
v's
#2 #9 #4
#7 #5 #3
#6 #1 #8
"BUT NOW, AFTER THAT YE HAVE KNOWN GOD, OR RATHER ARE KNOWN OF GOD, HOW
TURN YE AGAIN TO THE WEAK-asthenḗs (G772) AND BEGGARLY-ptōchós (G4434)
ELEMENTS-stoicheîon (G4747), WHEREUNTO YE DESIRE AGAIN TO BE IN BONDAGE?
#1 + #21 + #41 + #61 = #124
#124 as [#70, #4, #50] = ʻiddân (H5732): {UMBRA: #124 % #41 = #1} 1)
time; 1a) *TIME* (*OF* *DURATION*); 1b) *YEAR*;
#200 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#6, #30, #40, #70, #4, #10, #600] / [#30, #40, #6, #70, #4, #10, #600] /
#124 as [#40, #70, #4, #10] = môwʻêd (H4150): {UMBRA: #120 % #41 = #38}
*APPOINTED* *SEASON*; 1b) appointed meeting; 1c) appointed place; 1d)
#41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or
size; 1b) *OF* *TIME*: *SHORT*; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;
#59 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
#124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
#24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a) to be resolved or
determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;
YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
#1 - 21 DECEMBER
#21 - 21 MARCH
#41 - 21 JUNE
#61 - 23 SEPTEMBER
#401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive
epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right time;
2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of the
times, the things and events of time;
I AM AFRAID FOR YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:9-11]
Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and
Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
causality pertaining to the role of emergence in the creation of
consciousness that has been debated for over a century, but it remains
of value PROPOSITION is that any DELIMITER is relative to the AUTONOMOUS
PRINCIPLE, thereby as a METATHEORY OF LOGIC is a stratum as dialectic of
meta-descriptor prototypes which always precedes it.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9 - PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
Whereas the SAPIENT OPINION FROM AN EXPERT and those of the IGNORANT
POSTULATIONS OF STUPIDITY might both direct themselves to the same
PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER, the dialectic of meta-descriptor prototypes can
yield entirely different results which may be vital or may not satisfy
our contingent need for a STATIC conception with an inclusion of any
ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE with deference to the resultant CATEGORY
OF UNDERSTANDING such as for example #432 - DEVOID OF TRUTH OR USELESS
which is then associated to our STATIC conception.
In case you thought that our postulation on whether a noumenon based
"quantum mechanical trigger" is a self-modulating characteristic to "an
ontology of self-determination" was spurious opportunism and specious
rumination, we then @ 0810 hours the following day made a consideration
of error and obtained the following temporal heuristic:
INSTANTIATED @ 0810 HOURS ON 24 AUGUST 2021 GRAPPLE@[#29, #63, #80, #81,
#65, #1, #2, #11, #53] PROTOTYPE
#THREE: #181 as #19 - FOLLOWING (TS'UNG)
#FOUR: #204 as #42 - GOING TO MEET (YING)
#FIVE: #385 as #61 - EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)
#200 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#6, #10, #80, #100, #4] / [#80, #100, #6, #4, #10] /
#210 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#80, #100, #4, #6, #500] /
#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE as [#6, #5, #80, #100, #10, #4] = pâqad
(H6485): {UMBRA: #184 % #41 = #20} 1) to attend to, muster, number,
reckon, visit, punish, appoint, look after, care for; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
pay attention to, observe; 1a2) to attend to; 1a3) to seek, look about
for; 1a4) *TO* *SEEK* *IN* *VAIN*, *NEED*, *MISS*, *LACK*; 1a5) to
visit; 1a6) to visit upon, punish; 1a7) to pass in review, muster,
number; 1a8) to appoint, assign, lay upon as a charge, deposit; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be sought, be needed, be missed, be lacking; 1b2) to
be visited; 1b3) to be visited upon; 1b4) to be appointed; 1b5) to be
watched over; 1c) (Piel) to muster, call up; 1d) (Pual) *TO* *BE*
*PASSED* *IN* *REVIEW*, *BE* *CAUSED* *TO* *MISS*, *BE* *CALLED*, *BE*
*CALLED* *TO* *ACCOUNT*; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to set over, make overseer,
appoint an overseer; 1e2) to commit, entrust, commit for care, deposit;
1f) (Hophal); 1f1) to be visited; 1f2) to be deposited; 1f3) to be made
overseer, be entrusted; 1g) (Hithpael) numbered; 1h) (Hothpael)
numbered; 2) musterings, expenses;
However we must offer a caveat here and that is, our informal research
opinions are self education responses to the semantics from experts and
must be subjected to the rigour of independent peer review. Our goal
therefore is not to critique Cortese's paper on an ontology of self
determination having a timeless human drive towards HUMAN ENHANCEMENT
TECHNOLOGY (*HET*) but rather to proffer an accommodation of ideas
expressed therein and as syncretism progress my own semantics of
experience as informal research into GNOSIS EX MACHINA.
We note that QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT has both an ONTIC
technological basis (ie. the ONTIC intersection of #205 (#124 + #81) and
#164) associated with FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS to #492-voluntary
freewill that is not only a doorway to the legislative framework which
is in and of itself an immense opportunity, namely:
a) A neural linguistic capability which by reverse transcriptase as
TETRAD is able to define rules based quantum;
b) The FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS to #492-VOLUNTARY FREEWILL relative to
the ontology of @1 - SELF, provides a paradigm method for self modulation;
c) The noumenon is an ontic / sapient framework:
@123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY
@164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
@205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE
d) QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT redacted to an ONTIC technological
paradigm is then the basis for a sapient / knowledge based economy where
both the INTERNET OF THINGS and HUMAN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGY can
function as a franchised autonomy (#902 - AUTOS + #68 {#33, #17, #18} -
RIGHTS = #970 - NOMOS) having a "distinct modality of self-determination"
Whereby we envision that a sapient / knowledge based economy will enable
sovereign states to leverage taxation / transaction revenue on a
proportional basis which is derived from a global pool of usage.
Our subsequent discourse will be on Cortese's use of the word
téchnē-G5078 which we understand with respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA
(Godhead) as being an attribute of anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]):
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
#4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
#5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
LEXICON ENTRIES
#6) APOGRÁPHŌ: G583 (@86 - ACCORDING TO LAW)
#7) ARÉTĒ: G703 (@102 - ETHICAL / MORAL ACTION as @113 - PRINCIPLE OF
EMANATION BY #45 - METHODOLOGY + #68 - RIGHTS CONFORMITY)
#8) TÉCHNĒ: G5078 (@171 - TECHNIC SELF-DETERMINATION)
#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
#POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
#CANON: #171
TOTAL ONTIC CONCEPT:
@150 + @104 + #175 + @181 + @228 = #838
#838 + @86 + @102 + @171 = #1197 as [#5, #100, #100, #10, #7, #800, #40,
#5, #50, #70, #10] = rhizóō (G4492): {UMBRA: #987 % #41 = #3} 1) *TO*
*CAUSE* *TO* *STRIKE* *ROOT*, *TO* *STRENGTHEN* *WITH* *ROOTS*, *TO*
*RENDER* *FIRM*, *TO* *FIX*, *ESTABLISH*, cause a person or a thing to
be thoroughly grounded;
"ROOTED-G4492 AND BUILT UP IN HIM, AND STABLISHED IN THE FAITH, AS YE
HAVE BEEN TAUGHT, ABOUNDING THEREIN WITH THANKSGIVING.
BEWARE LEST ANY MAN SPOIL YOU THROUGH PHILOSOPHY AND VAIN DECEIT, AFTER
THE TRADITION OF MEN, AFTER THE RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD (ie. stoicheion
of the kosmos) AND NOT AFTER CHRIST.
FOR IN HIM DWELLETH ALL THE FULNESS OF THE GODHEAD (cf: #592 is the
RIGHTS noumenon extent) BODILY." [Colossians 2:7-9]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES:
[150, 104, 175, 181, 228, 86, 102, 171]
[150, {@1: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#69); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#69)}
104, {@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#80); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#92)}
175, {@3: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 13 -
INCREASE: TSENG (#105)}
181, {@4: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#147); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
(#124)}
228, {@5: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22});
Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#190)}
86, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#208); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#195)}
102, {@7: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#262); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#216)}
171] {@8: Sup: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#325); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#225)}
GRUMBLE (#325 - *ROOT* / TOTAL MAGIC SUM (#65) FOR 5x5, #225 -
*QUEEN*)@[69, 69, 11, 23, 24, 13, 43, 19, 28, 66, 33, 5, 54, 21, 63, 9]
GRUNTLE (#816 - *ROOT*, #550 - *SOVEREIGN* *DOMINION*)@[69, 69, 57, 69,
68, 11, 10, 23, 34, 24, 47, 13, 9, 43, 28, 19, 56, 28, 41, 66, 74, 33,
79, 5, 52, 54, 73, 21, 55, 63, 64, 9]
#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST* as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70,
#9, #8] /
#325 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] =
paradídōmi (G3860): {UMBRA: #1050 % #41 = #25} 1) to give into the hands
(of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 2a) to deliver
to one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up
one to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented,
put to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause
one to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 2d) to
commit, to commend; 2e) to deliver verbally; 2e1) commands, rites; 2e2)
to deliver by narrating, to report; 2f) to permit allow; 2f1) when the
fruit will allow that is when its ripeness permits; 2f2) gives itself
up, presents itself;
#168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE as [#100, #10, #7, #1, #50] /
#325 as [#100, #10, #7, #8, #200] = rhíza (G4491): {UMBRA: #118 % #41 =
#36} 1) a *ROOT*; 2) that which like a root springs from a root, a
sprout, shoot; 3) metaph. offspring, progeny;
#434 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#7, #8, #200, #5, #200, #9, #5] /
#225 as [#7, #8, #10, #200] /
#325 as [#5, #7, #8, #300, #5] = záō (G2198): {UMBRA: #808 % #41 = #29}
1) to live, breathe, be among the living (not lifeless, not dead); 2) to
enjoy real life; 2a) to have true life and worthy of the name; 2b)
active, blessed, endless in the kingdom of God; 3) to live i.e. pass
life, in the manner of the living and acting; 3a) of mortals or
character; 4) living water, having vital power in itself and exerting
the same upon the soul; 5) metaph. to be in full vigour; 5a) to be
fresh, strong, efficient,; 5b) as adj. active, powerful, efficacious;
#225 as [#5, #3, #2, #10, #200, #5] = gᵉbîyrâh (H1377): {UMBRA: #220 %
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
#816 as [#300, #200, #300, #10, #6] / [#6, #300, #200, #300, #10] =
sheresh (H8328): {UMBRA: #800 % #41 = #21} 1) *ROOT*; 1a) root
(literal); 1b) root (of people involving firmness or permanence) (fig);
1c) root, bottom (as lowest stratum) (fig);
#816 as [#10, #300, #200, #300, #6] = shârash (H8327): {UMBRA: #800 %
#41 = #21} 1) to uproot, take root, deal with the roots; 1a) (Piel) to
root up, root out; 1b) (Pual) to be rooted up or out (of produce); 1c)
(Poel) to take root; 1d) (Poal) to take root; 1e) (Hiphil) to take root,
cause to take root;
#550 as [#40, #40, #30, #20, #400, #500] = mamlâkâh (H4467): {UMBRA:
#135 % #41 = #12} 1) kingdom, dominion, reign, sovereignty; 1a) kingdom,
realm; 1b) sovereignty, dominion; 1c) reign;
Thusly we might reasonably conclude that the impetus for the Apostle
Paul's (Hebrew of Hebrews / Pharisee) discourse as the Epistle to the
Romans is to preserve the Jewish claim of Sovereignty: “BOAST NOT
AGAINST THE BRANCHES. BUT IF THOU BOAST, THOU BEAREST NOT THE ROOT-rhíza
(G4491), BUT THE ROOT-rhíza (G4491) THEE.
YOUTUBE: "Days of Elijah (No God Like Jehovah)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUIa674GGCo>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjZ_IlP9c5A>
THOU WILT SAY THEN, THE BRANCHES WERE BROKEN OFF, THAT I MIGHT BE
GRAFTED IN.
WELL; BECAUSE OF UNBELIEF THEY WERE BROKEN OFF, AND THOU STANDEST BY
FAITH. BE NOT HIGH-MINDED, BUT FEAR:
REMEMBERING THE FARHUD: “Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible over 500
times, it is NEVER mentioned in the Quran, not once!”
DOLF: Jerusalem and the temple is mentioned in the book of Jubilees as
base-7 time divisions in relation to an exegesis of the 10 Commandments
and genealogy.
“THEN THE KING (AHASUERUS WHO REIGNED, FROM INDIA EVEN UNTO ETHIOPIA,
OVER AN HUNDRED AND TWENTY SEVEN PROVINCES) SAID TO THE WISE MEN, WHICH
KNEW THE *TIMES*, (FOR SO [WAS] THE KING'S MANNER TOWARD ALL THAT KNEW
LAW AND JUDGMENT …)” [Esther 1:13 (KJV)]
Thus the statement: “O ye House of Israel, have ye offered me slain
beasts and sacrifices the space of 40 years in the wilderness” [cf:
Hosea, Acts 7:42]
The background geometric image is the "Flower of Life" from ABYDOS which
is 971 km away from Jerusalem.
The "Star of David" geometric image was known to Pythagoras during
Babylonian captivity some 871 km away from Jerusalem.
Is irrefutable proof that “Jerusalem and the temple” is Jewish as #509 -
YAHAD.

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Kabbalistic_Circle.jpg>
"... FIGURES WHICH YOU MADE TO WORSHIP THEM: AND I SHALL CARRY YOU
BEYOND BABYLON." [Acts 7:43]
FOR IF GOD SPARED NOT THE NATURAL BRANCHES, TAKE HEED LEST HE ALSO SPARE
NOT THEE.
BEHOLD THEREFORE THE GOODNESS AND SEVERITY OF GOD: ON THEM WHICH FELL,
SEVERITY; BUT TOWARD THEE, GOODNESS, IF THOU CONTINUE IN HIS GOODNESS:
OTHERWISE THOU ALSO SHALT BE CUT OFF.” [Romans 11:18-22 (KJV)]
Cortese (2016, p 27) states that the word ‘technic’ is used in the sense
of encompassing both technology and technique. It derives from the
ancient Greek notion of ‘techne’, which was a category that made no
distinction between technology and technique, or technology and methodology.
Given that we on 8 OCTOBER 2017 first publicly divulged our discovery of
YANG HSIUNG's (4 BCE) POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES being
the basis for an ONTIC epistemological premise, our goal then is to
briefly convey what is our work in progress into deploying the
methodology as the technological basis to Queen Victoria's Letters
Patent which whilst provisioning a historical continuity of mind, is
nevertheless an artefact from the industrial revolution era.
#1 #2 #3 = #6 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION / *POWERS* (#6 - FORM OF NATURE
(#3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE)) / EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE &
DEFINITE MEANING)
#8 #9 #4 = #21 - PRINCIPLE OF LIABILITY (#9 - AUTONOMY) / APODIDOMI:
G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
#7 #6 #5 = #18 - FORM OF NATURE {QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated
29 OCTOBER 1900} / POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE) AS
SOVEREIGN'S APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT
GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
SECTION VI - QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT: And whereas by 'The
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900,' it is amongst other
things enacted, that we may authorise the Governor General to APPOINT
any person or persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or
Deputies within any part of Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to
exercise, during the pleasure of the Governor General such *POWERS*, and
FUNCTIONS of the said Governor General as he thinks fit to assign to
such Deputy or Deputies, subject to any LIMITATIONS and directions as
aforesaid, to APPOINT any person or persons, jointly or severally. To be
his Deputy or Deputies within any part of Our said Commonwealth of
Australia, and in that capacity to exercise, during his pleasure, such
of his *POWERS* and FUNCTIONS, as he may deem it necessary or expedient
to assign to him or them: Provided always, that the APPOINTMENT of such
a Deputy or Deputies shall not affect the exercise by the Governor
General himself of any *POWER* or FUNCTION.
CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 = {
1: {idea: [265 - *THE* *KEY*, 266], page: [15, 15]},
2: {idea: [267, 268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, 269 - *CONCEPT*
*OF* *CONTRADICTION* {#1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON} + #49
{7x7: #175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2 = #150}, 272, 273, 274 -
*MISTRUST* *OF* *DOGMATISM*], page: [16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21]},
3: {idea: [270 - *AUSTRALIA* *DAY*], page: [22]},
6: {}, // <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 -
NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE})
9: {}, // <-- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
18: {IDEA: [298], PAGE: [50]}, // <-- QUEEN VICTORIA'S APO: G575 (@150
- ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 -
PRESENTS)
27: {idea: [311], page: [62]}, // #27 - *DUTIES* (*SHIH*)
54: {idea: [348], page: [99]} // #54 - UNITY
}
TETRAD TRINOMIAL DEFINITION OF NUMBER:
+ 0, 27, 54
+ 0, 9, 18
+ 0, 3, 6
+ 1, 2, 3
#298 as [#40, #8, #100, #100, #10, #600] = châqaq (H2710): {UMBRA: #11
as #208 - *WATCH* *FOR* *ARTIFICE*, *DECEIT*, *TRICK* % #41 = #3} 1) to
cut out, decree, inscribe, set, engrave, portray, govern; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to cut in; 1a2) to cut in or on, cut upon, engrave, inscribe; 1a3)
to trace, mark out; 1a4) *TO* *ENGRAVE*, *INSCRIBE* (*OF* *A* *LAW*);
1b) (Poel); 1b1) *TO* *INSCRIBE*, *ENACT*, *DECREE*; 1b2) *ONE* *WHO*
*DECREES*, *LAWGIVER* (*PARTICIPLE*); 1c) (Pual) something decreed, the
law (participle); 1d) (Hophal) to be inscribed;
The Greek notion of techné reifies (Cortese: 2016, p 13) the
co-constitutive relationship humans have with their technology because
it demonstrates that a clean and clear ontological distinction between
technology and technique, tool and thought, or device and mind is
neither necessary nor more appropriate than avoiding such a distinction.
And in this regard of GNOSIS EX MACHINA as the avoidance of ontological
distinctions between the nature and capacity of mind and tool or device
as machine (Greek: μηχᾰνή (mēkhanḗ)) we'll convey something of our
CONCEPT FOR IDEA TRANSMUTATION (AUGMENTATION / AMELIORATION) FOR ANY #81
- UNIVERSE OF DISCOURSE BEING #54 - UNITY OF APPERCEPTION as the
metalogic SCENARIO which demonstrates our case study as "fire evacuee"
--> "something terrible happened" change dynamic to the static
autonomous delimiter being a real world example diligently obtained from
an Internet based testimony during the Gippsland East bush fires last of
DECEMBER 2019.
WHEREIN WE CONSIDERED THAT WE MIGHT VIEW A *CATASTROPHIC* *EVENT* AS
KNOWN SCENARIO IN TERMS OF A *DISJUNCTIVE* PROPOSITION:
YANG SUPERNAL (NURTURE)
A BUSH FIRE EVENT
(?)
|
(?) <-- PROBLEM RESOLUTION --> (?)
|
(?)
YIN EGO (NATURE)
OUR REALITY
In this simple neural linguistic case study we were able to redact the
various ONTIC and metalogic components and model the entire narrative
idea content which was voluntarily made:
Such narrative producing the initial GRAPPLE [#41, #57, #1, #9, #10,
#27, #45, #46, #51] PROTOTYPE conveying an ONTIC premise as to impending
devastation by a @140 - RED GLOW encroaching within the distance...
[TO PRESERVE,
GUARD FROM
DANGERS]
#41 #57 #1
#46 #51 #9
#45 #27 #10 = #350 - PRESERVE FROM DANGERS / #287 - INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS
MORPHOLOGICAL CONDITION ([#79, #9, #70, #32]) --> [THEN SOMETHING
TERRIBLE HAPPENED. SO WHERE CAN WE ESCAPE TO NOW?]
#9 #41 #57
#45 #46 #1
#32 #27 #10 = #313 - DEVASTATED / #268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*
[EVERYTHING WILL BE
DEVASTATED]
A transmutation of the idea then producing the GRAPPLE [#9, #41, #57,
#1, #10, #27, #32, #45, #46] PROTOTYPE conveying that #281 -
*EVERYTHING* will be reduced to ashes…
And we concluded that whilst utilitarianism has been criticised for
focusing on the consequences rather than the motive or intrinsic nature
of an action, by the consideration that actions are right if they are
useful or for the benefit of a majority. The solution to this is perhaps
given by YANG HSIUNG's approach to his less or more structure:
#VIRTUE (MIND),
#TOOLS (SCIENCE),
#POSITION (OPINION),
#TIME (SENSE)
That might then be cause for a specialist field of BAYESIAN THEORY which
we'll term UTILITARIAN PROBABILITY that deals expressly with the
essentiality of the ONTIC premise as the impetus to any "motive or
intrinsic nature of an action".
As our introductory example being our conception of a PROPOSITIONAL
DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE we considered a STATIC
LIMITED {ie. #9} TERM of #51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG) which we had nuanced
to accommodate the need for COMPLIANCE in being a concern for #27 - DUTY
purveying some beneficial ACTION related to CALAMITY as #46 -
ENLARGEMENT (K'UO).
Thusly we return again to further prudent opinion from Francesco Cortese
... Human Enhancement Technology (*HET*) is according to Cortese (2016,
p 4), typically defined as any technological attempt to overcome or
obviate the biological limitations of the human body and brain or extend
the capacities and faculties of the human body and brain beyond their
normative range of capacities and faculties.
TIME X --> [NOUMENON] <-- TIME Y
<https://www.grapple369.com/?time:16.56>
#392 as [#2, #300, #40, #10, #600] = shâmayim (H8064): {UMBRA: #390 %
#41 = #21} 1) heaven, heavens, sky; 1a) visible heavens, sky; 1a1) as
abode of the stars; 1a2) as the visible universe, the sky, atmosphere,
etc; 1b) Heaven (as the abode of God);
#392 as [#1, #10, #200, #9, #1, #50, #70, #40, #1, #10] = aisthánomai
(G143): {UMBRA: #392 % #41 = #23} 1) to perceive; 1a) by the bodily
senses; 1b) *WITH* *THE* *MIND*, understand;
Given our understanding of noumenon as a neuro-linguistic concept with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) in being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]) against which is made a resonance
as the subjective conception of phenomenal experience.
#369 - HUMAN DISCRIMINATING NORM:
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its
noumenon: 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF and the #728 - MORPHOS
#728 as [#40, #70, #100, #500, #8, #10] = morphḗ (G3444): {UMBRA: #718 %
#41 = #21} 1) the form by which a person or thing strikes the vision; 2)
external appearance;
The notion of technique and thought as 'works of the mind' asserts
Cortese (2016, p 13), are equally viable and vital components of the
human condition which is met with much less resistance than the notion
that technology is so. Perhaps merely because technique and methodology
cannot be physically separated from the mind (except when it is embodied
in technology), and could not continue existing if humanity went extinct
tomorrow – in contrast to technology, which could do both.
We would intuitively ask the question relative to the anthropocentric
(ie. human being as the central or most important element of existence)
characteristic:
Whether mind is constituted by a sensibility of determinism as cognitive
process of apprehension assisted by a ratiocination construct (ie.
theory that the universe is utterly rational: 22 / 7) such as #2184 -
anthropologic cosmogonic principle?
#2184 x 49 = 107,016 days (294 x 364)
107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126 tropical year
As considerations of methodological self-determination as autogenic
thoughts steering morphogenic knots, Cortese (2016, p 8) states that one
of the ways humans (organisms generally) change the wiring of their
brains is in response to thought and perception which constitute a
modality of self-determination in and of themselves, insofar as they can
facilitate changes to the material systems and processes underlying our
brains, thereby facilitating the modification of our emergent
intellectual and experiential capacities and faculties constituted thereby.
If we consider the ontic root @168: @1 + METALOGIC #8 - AUTONOMOUS
DELIMITER (#27) in light of the HEGEL / MARX dialectic formulations
which convey a septet basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 / 7
then the central unifying principle is the actuation of an ONTIC
28 x 6,
24 x 7,
21 x 8 = #168
#168 x #13 = #2184
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
#0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1 ---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
#2184 / 5 = #436 + #4 - IMPERATIVE FOR JUDGMENTS
My informal research intuition is of #0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1
---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT relating to #414 / #622 - METASTASIS
being anchored #0 ---> upon the *PERIHELION* of 3 JANUARY ---> and #288
/ #325 / #436 - COHESION occurring from that point as then capable in
having #1 ---> #2184 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE OVERSIGHT.
Cortese (2016, p 9) does not conceive of any involvement of noumenon as
the basis for perception as inherent to the ontological notion of
sapience in being human. Which is apparent in his regard for criticism
such as the notion, that unlike thought, which is internal to self,
perception whether rational or irrational would fail to constitute a
modality or means of self-determination because it is initiated from
systems and processes external to the self.
WE POSTULATE AS DUALITY (GOOD / EVIL) THAT THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO
perception is indistinct and, we would argue, more a pragmatic tool than
a real ontological truth as-such. When we think on a conscious level, we
employ sensory impressions to convey or “embody” the informational
substrata of our thoughts – whether by way of visualizing a process
being articulated through time or the relative organization of
components and/or sequences of events, or via the explicit use of words
(i.e. “thinking in sentences”).
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing
of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a
car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an
earlier experience of a *BOMB* *BLAST*) is a priori and transitional
towards it's final comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and
correct orthography or a #416 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *LAW* ('OTH CYCLE: #364
+ #312 + #416 = #1092) as then the basis for its apprehension as
Category of Understanding.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as
elimination--is the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring
knowledge and explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's subsequent
refinement until it was satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence:
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
Thusly perception is inherent, such that confusion like fear and
paranoia which steadfastly and habitually refuses to overcome its
ignorant state by informing itself, can then be considered delusional.
CONCLUSION
If the ONOMANTIC basis of binomial number has its root in MIND / SCIENCE
and OPINION / SENSE, then (Cortese: 2016, p 13) claim to avoid such
distinctions between device and mind or thought and perception as is
then rhetorical artifice which is ignorant of trinomial number and a
denial of essential attribute of anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
Our simple case study as "fire evacuee" --> "something terrible
happened" change dynamic which quantifies the metalogic basis is a
rational neurological representation of data for which we ought now make
consideration of Shelli Joye's overview of field theories of
consciousness which support the idea that the electromagnetic field
itself is the basis of consciousness and that this source of
consciousness peers out into the space-time universe through our human
sensory systems.
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Self%20Determination.pdf>
Initial Post: 23 August 2021
STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2021
Before we continue with the implementation of our noetic lexicon
navigation within the GRUMBLE prototype, we ought to ought to make self
educated appraisal of a research chapter from the International Journal
of Technoethics and a scholarly book so as to make an accommodation of
ideas expressed therein and as syncretism progress my own semantics of
experience:
- The Technoethical Ethos of Technic Self-Deterimination by Francesco A.
B. Cortese (2016)
- The Electromagnetic Brain by Shelli Joye (2020)
As introduction we find on pages 5 & 6 this comment relevant to our
*ONTIC* understanding of @1 - SELF, #492 - FREEWILL and #491 - AGENCY
(ie. @84, @86, @102, @104, @115)
Cortese (2016) says "Our position implicit within the thesis of this
paper falls within compatibilism. Indeed, we contend that freewill is
not only compatible with determinism – but that determinism is actually
a necessary precondition for free will (which we will use synonymously
in this paper with autonomy and self- determination).
...
If such means of partial determination (and thus of partial
self-determination) WERE AVAILABLE DURING THE *MILLENNIA* (as especially
two) IN WHICH THE SEEMING INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN FREE WILL AND CAUSAL
DETERMINISM BECAME ENTRENCHED WITHIN THE WESTERN PHILOSOPHICAL
TRADITION, then it is likely that the dilemma of determinism wouldn't
have posed such an unquestionable affront to the *ONTIC* legitimacy of
our autonomy and agency."
Causal determinism is, roughly speaking, the idea that every event is
necessitated by antecedent events and conditions together with the laws
of nature:
CONCEPTUAL ISSUES IN DETERMINISM
2.1 The World (kosmos)
2.2 The way things are at a time
2.3 Thereafter
2.4 Laws of nature
2.5 Fixed
Fixed determinism requires a world that (a) has a well-defined state or
description, at any given time, and (b) laws of nature that are true at
all places and times. If we have all these, then if (a) and (b) together
logically entail the state of the world at all other times (or, at
least, all times later than that given in (a)), the world is
deterministic. Logical entailment, in a sense broad enough to encompass
mathematical consequence, is the modality behind the determination in
“determinism.” <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal>
The idea is ancient, but first became subject to clarification and
mathematical analysis in the eighteenth century.
Towards that end, we are currently at the vCognition vantage point of
the GRAPPLE HEURISTIC@[21,43,60,65,66,69,71,72,81] considering the
NOETIC LEXICON COGNITION {IDEA #206 AS #THREE / #342 AS #FOUR -
PYTHAGOREAN ONOMANTIC PROTOTYPE #SIX - ROMAN / #FIVE - TORAH} and our
intention is to then evolve the visualization as each of these LEXICON /
NOETIC concepts of "GOD THE CENTRE OF VALUE THEORY WITHIN THEOLOGY"
within the sectarian #71 - WORLDVIEW of either or collectively:
⁃ ALLAHU AKBAR (God is Great)
⁃ DEUS VULT (God wills it)
⁃ DIEU ET MON DROIT (God and my right)
By such notions as STRONGS reference dârash (H1875): {UMBRA: #504 % #41
= #12} 1a2) *TO* *CONSULT*, *ENQUIRE* *OF*, *SEEK*; i) *OF* *GOD*;
<div>
<span name="0">H1875</span>
</div>
In whatsoever manner available:
H1875 (דרשנו):
which is infinitely expandable."
Whereas the result having four {value: [70, 10, 5, 57], position: [5, 6,
7, 3], type: 128} of nine grapple [] array value elements by an
COINRULES.library.intersectGrappleArray([2, 70, 10, 71, 9, 8, 38, 5,
57], [4, 4, 81, 57, 55, 70, 10, 5, 72]) action ought to convey some
sensibility to us that the values array: [70, 10, 5, 57] were matched
within positions [5, 6, 7, 3] and were a sequential match within nous #5
- KEEPING SMALL (SHAO) being position 7 of the grapple [] array.
The philosophical consideration on "#902 - AUTOS + #68 - RIGHTS {#33,
#17, #18} = #970 - NOMOS" is an exemplar concern for HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY.
Cortese (2016, p 3) in agreeing with others (Smart and Haldane, 2003)
rejects the indeterminist notion that our immersive interoperability
within the world (kosmos) is subject to a "QUANTUM MECHANICAL TRIGGER"
which motivates our freedom towards any will to action.
Although Cortese (2016, p 14) considers that writing can be categorized
as technique he asserts that without the technological infrastructure of
something to write with and something to write on, one would be
hard-pressed to employ it.
My concern with such a notion is that the objects of perception are here
written words as Cortese's chapter on Technic Self-Determination to be
precise with the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC at the time of reading and
contemplation:
INSTANTIATED @ 1510 HOURS ON 23 AUGUST 2021 GIVES TEMPORAL HEURISTIC AS
GRAPPLE@[#78, #71, #7, #40, #25, #18, #10, #19, #61] PROTOTYPE:
#THREE: #126 as #45 - GREATNESS (TA)
#FOUR: #203 as #41 - RESPONSE (YING)
#FIVE: #329 as #5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO
#327 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 AUGUST 2021 as
[#3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] /
#770 as [#3, #100, #1, #500, #70, #40, #5, #50, #1] = gráphō (G1125):
{UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with reference to the form of
the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) letters on a tablet, parchment,
paper, or other material; 2) to write, with reference to the contents of
the writing; 2a) to express in written characters; 2b) to commit to
writing (things not to be forgotten), write down, record; 2c) used of
those things which stand written in the sacred books (of the OT); 2d) to
write to one, i.e. by writing (in a written epistle) to give
information, directions; 3) to fill with writing; 4) to draw up in
writing, compose;
Fixed determinism requires a world that (a) has a well-defined state or
description, at any given time, and (b) laws of nature that are true at
all places and times. However Kant within idea @225 of his Prolegomena
(1783) suggests that time in itself cannot be perceived: "All
appearances are in time, in which, as substratum (as the persisting form
of inner intuition), simultaneous existence as well as succession can
alone be represented. Therefore time, in which every change in the
appearances is to be thought, remains and does not change; for in it
alone can successive or simultaneous existence be represented, as its
determinations. Now time in itself cannot be perceived.
Consequently, in the objects of perception, i.e., in the appearances, a
substratum must be found that represents time in general and in which
all change or simultaneous existence can be perceived through the
relation of the appearances to it in apprehension. But substance – the
substratum of everything real, i.e., of everything belonging to the
existence of things – is that in which every- thing that belongs to
existence can be thought only as a determination. Consequently, that
which persists – in relation to which alone all time- relations of the
appearances can be determined – is the substance in the appearances,
i.e., the real in them, which as the substratum of all change remains
always the same. Since this therefore cannot change in existence, its
quantum in nature can also be neither increased nor diminished. [p 183]
As we explore this chapter further, we'll need to consider whether a
noumenon based "quantum mechanical trigger" is a self-modulating
characteristic to "an ontology of self-determination".
Cortese (2016, p 3) further states that the dichotomy of determinism as
a false free-will dilemma was engendered for millennia and established
within the western philosophical as perennial tradition.
And this we have explained is probably due to the basis of that
dogmatism as perennial school of thinking having a foundational reliance
upon the STOICHEION elements as #45 - METHODOLOGY of RELIGIONISTS and
which is dogmatically (ie. whether #1827 - Eucharist or Hajj as purposed
life) and existentially #5 - centred upon the #9 - PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY
as an institutional basis for its economy, in that it thereby conveys an
extrusion of being having an inherent antagonism (ie. WEAK-asthenḗs
(G772) and BEGGARLY-ptōchós (G4434) ELEMENTS-stoicheîon (G4747)):
ENHANCER OR SUBJUGATOR?
#1 #2 #3
#8 #9 #4
#7 #6 #5
v's
#2 #9 #4
#7 #5 #3
#6 #1 #8
"BUT NOW, AFTER THAT YE HAVE KNOWN GOD, OR RATHER ARE KNOWN OF GOD, HOW
TURN YE AGAIN TO THE WEAK-asthenḗs (G772) AND BEGGARLY-ptōchós (G4434)
ELEMENTS-stoicheîon (G4747), WHEREUNTO YE DESIRE AGAIN TO BE IN BONDAGE?
#1 + #21 + #41 + #61 = #124
#124 as [#70, #4, #50] = ʻiddân (H5732): {UMBRA: #124 % #41 = #1} 1)
time; 1a) *TIME* (*OF* *DURATION*); 1b) *YEAR*;
#200 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#6, #30, #40, #70, #4, #10, #600] / [#30, #40, #6, #70, #4, #10, #600] /
#124 as [#40, #70, #4, #10] = môwʻêd (H4150): {UMBRA: #120 % #41 = #38}
1) appointed place, appointed time, meeting; 1a) appointed time; 1a1)
appointed time (general); 1a2) *SACRED* *SEASON*, *SET* *FEAST*,
*APPOINTED* *SEASON*; 1b) appointed meeting; 1c) appointed place; 1d)
appointed sign or signal; 1e) tent of meeting;
#124 as [#70, #30, #10, #3, #1, #10] = olígos (G3641): {UMBRA: #383 %
#41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or
size; 1b) *OF* *TIME*: *SHORT*; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;
#59 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
#124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
#24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a) to be resolved or
determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;
YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
#21 - 21 MARCH
#41 - 21 JUNE
#61 - 23 SEPTEMBER
#401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive
epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right time;
2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of the
times, the things and events of time;
I AM AFRAID FOR YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:9-11]
Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and
Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
causality pertaining to the role of emergence in the creation of
consciousness that has been debated for over a century, but it remains
unresolved. In particular there is controversy over the claim that a
“strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal
consciousness.
In making a nomenclature consideration of #45 - METHODOLOGY the #CENTRE
“strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal
consciousness.
of value PROPOSITION is that any DELIMITER is relative to the AUTONOMOUS
PRINCIPLE, thereby as a METATHEORY OF LOGIC is a stratum as dialectic of
meta-descriptor prototypes which always precedes it.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9 - PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
Whereas the SAPIENT OPINION FROM AN EXPERT and those of the IGNORANT
POSTULATIONS OF STUPIDITY might both direct themselves to the same
PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER, the dialectic of meta-descriptor prototypes can
yield entirely different results which may be vital or may not satisfy
our contingent need for a STATIC conception with an inclusion of any
ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE with deference to the resultant CATEGORY
OF UNDERSTANDING such as for example #432 - DEVOID OF TRUTH OR USELESS
which is then associated to our STATIC conception.
In case you thought that our postulation on whether a noumenon based
"quantum mechanical trigger" is a self-modulating characteristic to "an
ontology of self-determination" was spurious opportunism and specious
rumination, we then @ 0810 hours the following day made a consideration
of error and obtained the following temporal heuristic:
INSTANTIATED @ 0810 HOURS ON 24 AUGUST 2021 GRAPPLE@[#29, #63, #80, #81,
#65, #1, #2, #11, #53] PROTOTYPE
#THREE: #181 as #19 - FOLLOWING (TS'UNG)
#FOUR: #204 as #42 - GOING TO MEET (YING)
#FIVE: #385 as #61 - EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)
#200 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#6, #10, #80, #100, #4] / [#80, #100, #6, #4, #10] /
#210 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#80, #100, #4, #6, #500] /
#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE as [#6, #5, #80, #100, #10, #4] = pâqad
(H6485): {UMBRA: #184 % #41 = #20} 1) to attend to, muster, number,
reckon, visit, punish, appoint, look after, care for; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
pay attention to, observe; 1a2) to attend to; 1a3) to seek, look about
for; 1a4) *TO* *SEEK* *IN* *VAIN*, *NEED*, *MISS*, *LACK*; 1a5) to
visit; 1a6) to visit upon, punish; 1a7) to pass in review, muster,
number; 1a8) to appoint, assign, lay upon as a charge, deposit; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be sought, be needed, be missed, be lacking; 1b2) to
be visited; 1b3) to be visited upon; 1b4) to be appointed; 1b5) to be
watched over; 1c) (Piel) to muster, call up; 1d) (Pual) *TO* *BE*
*PASSED* *IN* *REVIEW*, *BE* *CAUSED* *TO* *MISS*, *BE* *CALLED*, *BE*
*CALLED* *TO* *ACCOUNT*; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to set over, make overseer,
appoint an overseer; 1e2) to commit, entrust, commit for care, deposit;
1f) (Hophal); 1f1) to be visited; 1f2) to be deposited; 1f3) to be made
overseer, be entrusted; 1g) (Hithpael) numbered; 1h) (Hothpael)
numbered; 2) musterings, expenses;
However we must offer a caveat here and that is, our informal research
opinions are self education responses to the semantics from experts and
must be subjected to the rigour of independent peer review. Our goal
therefore is not to critique Cortese's paper on an ontology of self
determination having a timeless human drive towards HUMAN ENHANCEMENT
TECHNOLOGY (*HET*) but rather to proffer an accommodation of ideas
expressed therein and as syncretism progress my own semantics of
experience as informal research into GNOSIS EX MACHINA.
We note that QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT has both an ONTIC
technological basis (ie. the ONTIC intersection of #205 (#124 + #81) and
#164) associated with FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS to #492-voluntary
freewill that is not only a doorway to the legislative framework which
is in and of itself an immense opportunity, namely:
a) A neural linguistic capability which by reverse transcriptase as
TETRAD is able to define rules based quantum;
b) The FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS to #492-VOLUNTARY FREEWILL relative to
the ontology of @1 - SELF, provides a paradigm method for self modulation;
c) The noumenon is an ontic / sapient framework:
@123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY
@164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
@205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE
d) QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT redacted to an ONTIC technological
paradigm is then the basis for a sapient / knowledge based economy where
both the INTERNET OF THINGS and HUMAN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGY can
function as a franchised autonomy (#902 - AUTOS + #68 {#33, #17, #18} -
RIGHTS = #970 - NOMOS) having a "distinct modality of self-determination"
Whereby we envision that a sapient / knowledge based economy will enable
sovereign states to leverage taxation / transaction revenue on a
proportional basis which is derived from a global pool of usage.
Our subsequent discourse will be on Cortese's use of the word
téchnē-G5078 which we understand with respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA
(Godhead) as being an attribute of anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]):
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
#4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
#5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
LEXICON ENTRIES
#6) APOGRÁPHŌ: G583 (@86 - ACCORDING TO LAW)
#7) ARÉTĒ: G703 (@102 - ETHICAL / MORAL ACTION as @113 - PRINCIPLE OF
EMANATION BY #45 - METHODOLOGY + #68 - RIGHTS CONFORMITY)
#8) TÉCHNĒ: G5078 (@171 - TECHNIC SELF-DETERMINATION)
#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
#POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
#CANON: #171
TOTAL ONTIC CONCEPT:
@150 + @104 + #175 + @181 + @228 = #838
#838 + @86 + @102 + @171 = #1197 as [#5, #100, #100, #10, #7, #800, #40,
#5, #50, #70, #10] = rhizóō (G4492): {UMBRA: #987 % #41 = #3} 1) *TO*
*CAUSE* *TO* *STRIKE* *ROOT*, *TO* *STRENGTHEN* *WITH* *ROOTS*, *TO*
*RENDER* *FIRM*, *TO* *FIX*, *ESTABLISH*, cause a person or a thing to
be thoroughly grounded;
"ROOTED-G4492 AND BUILT UP IN HIM, AND STABLISHED IN THE FAITH, AS YE
HAVE BEEN TAUGHT, ABOUNDING THEREIN WITH THANKSGIVING.
BEWARE LEST ANY MAN SPOIL YOU THROUGH PHILOSOPHY AND VAIN DECEIT, AFTER
THE TRADITION OF MEN, AFTER THE RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD (ie. stoicheion
of the kosmos) AND NOT AFTER CHRIST.
FOR IN HIM DWELLETH ALL THE FULNESS OF THE GODHEAD (cf: #592 is the
RIGHTS noumenon extent) BODILY." [Colossians 2:7-9]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES:
[150, 104, 175, 181, 228, 86, 102, 171]
[150, {@1: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#69); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#69)}
104, {@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#80); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#92)}
175, {@3: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 13 -
INCREASE: TSENG (#105)}
181, {@4: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#147); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
(#124)}
228, {@5: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22});
Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#190)}
86, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#208); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#195)}
102, {@7: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#262); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#216)}
171] {@8: Sup: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#325); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#225)}
GRUMBLE (#325 - *ROOT* / TOTAL MAGIC SUM (#65) FOR 5x5, #225 -
*QUEEN*)@[69, 69, 11, 23, 24, 13, 43, 19, 28, 66, 33, 5, 54, 21, 63, 9]
GRUNTLE (#816 - *ROOT*, #550 - *SOVEREIGN* *DOMINION*)@[69, 69, 57, 69,
68, 11, 10, 23, 34, 24, 47, 13, 9, 43, 28, 19, 56, 28, 41, 66, 74, 33,
79, 5, 52, 54, 73, 21, 55, 63, 64, 9]
#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST* as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70,
#9, #8] /
#325 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] =
paradídōmi (G3860): {UMBRA: #1050 % #41 = #25} 1) to give into the hands
(of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 2a) to deliver
to one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up
one to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented,
put to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause
one to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 2d) to
commit, to commend; 2e) to deliver verbally; 2e1) commands, rites; 2e2)
to deliver by narrating, to report; 2f) to permit allow; 2f1) when the
fruit will allow that is when its ripeness permits; 2f2) gives itself
up, presents itself;
#168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE as [#100, #10, #7, #1, #50] /
#325 as [#100, #10, #7, #8, #200] = rhíza (G4491): {UMBRA: #118 % #41 =
#36} 1) a *ROOT*; 2) that which like a root springs from a root, a
sprout, shoot; 3) metaph. offspring, progeny;
#434 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#7, #8, #200, #5, #200, #9, #5] /
#225 as [#7, #8, #10, #200] /
#325 as [#5, #7, #8, #300, #5] = záō (G2198): {UMBRA: #808 % #41 = #29}
1) to live, breathe, be among the living (not lifeless, not dead); 2) to
enjoy real life; 2a) to have true life and worthy of the name; 2b)
active, blessed, endless in the kingdom of God; 3) to live i.e. pass
life, in the manner of the living and acting; 3a) of mortals or
character; 4) living water, having vital power in itself and exerting
the same upon the soul; 5) metaph. to be in full vigour; 5a) to be
fresh, strong, efficient,; 5b) as adj. active, powerful, efficacious;
#225 as [#5, #3, #2, #10, #200, #5] = gᵉbîyrâh (H1377): {UMBRA: #220 %
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
sheresh (H8328): {UMBRA: #800 % #41 = #21} 1) *ROOT*; 1a) root
(literal); 1b) root (of people involving firmness or permanence) (fig);
1c) root, bottom (as lowest stratum) (fig);
#816 as [#10, #300, #200, #300, #6] = shârash (H8327): {UMBRA: #800 %
#41 = #21} 1) to uproot, take root, deal with the roots; 1a) (Piel) to
root up, root out; 1b) (Pual) to be rooted up or out (of produce); 1c)
(Poel) to take root; 1d) (Poal) to take root; 1e) (Hiphil) to take root,
cause to take root;
#550 as [#40, #40, #30, #20, #400, #500] = mamlâkâh (H4467): {UMBRA:
#135 % #41 = #12} 1) kingdom, dominion, reign, sovereignty; 1a) kingdom,
realm; 1b) sovereignty, dominion; 1c) reign;
Thusly we might reasonably conclude that the impetus for the Apostle
Paul's (Hebrew of Hebrews / Pharisee) discourse as the Epistle to the
Romans is to preserve the Jewish claim of Sovereignty: “BOAST NOT
AGAINST THE BRANCHES. BUT IF THOU BOAST, THOU BEAREST NOT THE ROOT-rhíza
(G4491), BUT THE ROOT-rhíza (G4491) THEE.
YOUTUBE: "Days of Elijah (No God Like Jehovah)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUIa674GGCo>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjZ_IlP9c5A>
THOU WILT SAY THEN, THE BRANCHES WERE BROKEN OFF, THAT I MIGHT BE
GRAFTED IN.
WELL; BECAUSE OF UNBELIEF THEY WERE BROKEN OFF, AND THOU STANDEST BY
FAITH. BE NOT HIGH-MINDED, BUT FEAR:
REMEMBERING THE FARHUD: “Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible over 500
times, it is NEVER mentioned in the Quran, not once!”
DOLF: Jerusalem and the temple is mentioned in the book of Jubilees as
base-7 time divisions in relation to an exegesis of the 10 Commandments
and genealogy.
OVER AN HUNDRED AND TWENTY SEVEN PROVINCES) SAID TO THE WISE MEN, WHICH
KNEW THE *TIMES*, (FOR SO [WAS] THE KING'S MANNER TOWARD ALL THAT KNEW
LAW AND JUDGMENT …)” [Esther 1:13 (KJV)]
Thus the statement: “O ye House of Israel, have ye offered me slain
beasts and sacrifices the space of 40 years in the wilderness” [cf:
Hosea, Acts 7:42]
The background geometric image is the "Flower of Life" from ABYDOS which
is 971 km away from Jerusalem.
The "Star of David" geometric image was known to Pythagoras during
Babylonian captivity some 871 km away from Jerusalem.
Is irrefutable proof that “Jerusalem and the temple” is Jewish as #509 -
YAHAD.

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Kabbalistic_Circle.jpg>
BEYOND BABYLON." [Acts 7:43]
FOR IF GOD SPARED NOT THE NATURAL BRANCHES, TAKE HEED LEST HE ALSO SPARE
NOT THEE.
BEHOLD THEREFORE THE GOODNESS AND SEVERITY OF GOD: ON THEM WHICH FELL,
SEVERITY; BUT TOWARD THEE, GOODNESS, IF THOU CONTINUE IN HIS GOODNESS:
OTHERWISE THOU ALSO SHALT BE CUT OFF.” [Romans 11:18-22 (KJV)]
Cortese (2016, p 27) states that the word ‘technic’ is used in the sense
of encompassing both technology and technique. It derives from the
ancient Greek notion of ‘techne’, which was a category that made no
distinction between technology and technique, or technology and methodology.
Given that we on 8 OCTOBER 2017 first publicly divulged our discovery of
YANG HSIUNG's (4 BCE) POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES being
the basis for an ONTIC epistemological premise, our goal then is to
briefly convey what is our work in progress into deploying the
methodology as the technological basis to Queen Victoria's Letters
Patent which whilst provisioning a historical continuity of mind, is
nevertheless an artefact from the industrial revolution era.
#1 #2 #3 = #6 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION / *POWERS* (#6 - FORM OF NATURE
(#3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE)) / EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE &
DEFINITE MEANING)
#8 #9 #4 = #21 - PRINCIPLE OF LIABILITY (#9 - AUTONOMY) / APODIDOMI:
G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
#7 #6 #5 = #18 - FORM OF NATURE {QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated
29 OCTOBER 1900} / POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE) AS
SOVEREIGN'S APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT
GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
SECTION VI - QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT: And whereas by 'The
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900,' it is amongst other
things enacted, that we may authorise the Governor General to APPOINT
any person or persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or
Deputies within any part of Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to
exercise, during the pleasure of the Governor General such *POWERS*, and
FUNCTIONS of the said Governor General as he thinks fit to assign to
such Deputy or Deputies, subject to any LIMITATIONS and directions as
aforesaid, to APPOINT any person or persons, jointly or severally. To be
his Deputy or Deputies within any part of Our said Commonwealth of
Australia, and in that capacity to exercise, during his pleasure, such
of his *POWERS* and FUNCTIONS, as he may deem it necessary or expedient
to assign to him or them: Provided always, that the APPOINTMENT of such
a Deputy or Deputies shall not affect the exercise by the Governor
General himself of any *POWER* or FUNCTION.
CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 = {
1: {idea: [265 - *THE* *KEY*, 266], page: [15, 15]},
2: {idea: [267, 268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, 269 - *CONCEPT*
*OF* *CONTRADICTION* {#1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON} + #49
{7x7: #175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2 = #150}, 272, 273, 274 -
*MISTRUST* *OF* *DOGMATISM*], page: [16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21]},
3: {idea: [270 - *AUSTRALIA* *DAY*], page: [22]},
6: {}, // <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 -
NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE})
9: {}, // <-- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
18: {IDEA: [298], PAGE: [50]}, // <-- QUEEN VICTORIA'S APO: G575 (@150
- ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 -
PRESENTS)
27: {idea: [311], page: [62]}, // #27 - *DUTIES* (*SHIH*)
54: {idea: [348], page: [99]} // #54 - UNITY
}
TETRAD TRINOMIAL DEFINITION OF NUMBER:
+ 0, 27, 54
+ 0, 9, 18
+ 0, 3, 6
+ 1, 2, 3
#298 as [#40, #8, #100, #100, #10, #600] = châqaq (H2710): {UMBRA: #11
as #208 - *WATCH* *FOR* *ARTIFICE*, *DECEIT*, *TRICK* % #41 = #3} 1) to
cut out, decree, inscribe, set, engrave, portray, govern; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to cut in; 1a2) to cut in or on, cut upon, engrave, inscribe; 1a3)
to trace, mark out; 1a4) *TO* *ENGRAVE*, *INSCRIBE* (*OF* *A* *LAW*);
1b) (Poel); 1b1) *TO* *INSCRIBE*, *ENACT*, *DECREE*; 1b2) *ONE* *WHO*
*DECREES*, *LAWGIVER* (*PARTICIPLE*); 1c) (Pual) something decreed, the
law (participle); 1d) (Hophal) to be inscribed;
The Greek notion of techné reifies (Cortese: 2016, p 13) the
co-constitutive relationship humans have with their technology because
it demonstrates that a clean and clear ontological distinction between
technology and technique, tool and thought, or device and mind is
neither necessary nor more appropriate than avoiding such a distinction.
And in this regard of GNOSIS EX MACHINA as the avoidance of ontological
distinctions between the nature and capacity of mind and tool or device
as machine (Greek: μηχᾰνή (mēkhanḗ)) we'll convey something of our
CONCEPT FOR IDEA TRANSMUTATION (AUGMENTATION / AMELIORATION) FOR ANY #81
- UNIVERSE OF DISCOURSE BEING #54 - UNITY OF APPERCEPTION as the
metalogic SCENARIO which demonstrates our case study as "fire evacuee"
--> "something terrible happened" change dynamic to the static
autonomous delimiter being a real world example diligently obtained from
an Internet based testimony during the Gippsland East bush fires last of
DECEMBER 2019.
WHEREIN WE CONSIDERED THAT WE MIGHT VIEW A *CATASTROPHIC* *EVENT* AS
KNOWN SCENARIO IN TERMS OF A *DISJUNCTIVE* PROPOSITION:
YANG SUPERNAL (NURTURE)
A BUSH FIRE EVENT
(?)
|
(?) <-- PROBLEM RESOLUTION --> (?)
|
(?)
YIN EGO (NATURE)
OUR REALITY
In this simple neural linguistic case study we were able to redact the
various ONTIC and metalogic components and model the entire narrative
idea content which was voluntarily made:
Such narrative producing the initial GRAPPLE [#41, #57, #1, #9, #10,
#27, #45, #46, #51] PROTOTYPE conveying an ONTIC premise as to impending
devastation by a @140 - RED GLOW encroaching within the distance...
[TO PRESERVE,
GUARD FROM
DANGERS]
#41 #57 #1
#46 #51 #9
#45 #27 #10 = #350 - PRESERVE FROM DANGERS / #287 - INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS
MORPHOLOGICAL CONDITION ([#79, #9, #70, #32]) --> [THEN SOMETHING
TERRIBLE HAPPENED. SO WHERE CAN WE ESCAPE TO NOW?]
#9 #41 #57
#45 #46 #1
#32 #27 #10 = #313 - DEVASTATED / #268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*
[EVERYTHING WILL BE
DEVASTATED]
A transmutation of the idea then producing the GRAPPLE [#9, #41, #57,
#1, #10, #27, #32, #45, #46] PROTOTYPE conveying that #281 -
*EVERYTHING* will be reduced to ashes…
And we concluded that whilst utilitarianism has been criticised for
focusing on the consequences rather than the motive or intrinsic nature
of an action, by the consideration that actions are right if they are
useful or for the benefit of a majority. The solution to this is perhaps
given by YANG HSIUNG's approach to his less or more structure:
#VIRTUE (MIND),
#TOOLS (SCIENCE),
#POSITION (OPINION),
#TIME (SENSE)
That might then be cause for a specialist field of BAYESIAN THEORY which
we'll term UTILITARIAN PROBABILITY that deals expressly with the
essentiality of the ONTIC premise as the impetus to any "motive or
intrinsic nature of an action".
As our introductory example being our conception of a PROPOSITIONAL
DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE we considered a STATIC
LIMITED {ie. #9} TERM of #51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG) which we had nuanced
to accommodate the need for COMPLIANCE in being a concern for #27 - DUTY
purveying some beneficial ACTION related to CALAMITY as #46 -
ENLARGEMENT (K'UO).
Thusly we return again to further prudent opinion from Francesco Cortese
... Human Enhancement Technology (*HET*) is according to Cortese (2016,
p 4), typically defined as any technological attempt to overcome or
obviate the biological limitations of the human body and brain or extend
the capacities and faculties of the human body and brain beyond their
normative range of capacities and faculties.
TIME X --> [NOUMENON] <-- TIME Y
<https://www.grapple369.com/?time:16.56>
#392 as [#2, #300, #40, #10, #600] = shâmayim (H8064): {UMBRA: #390 %
#41 = #21} 1) heaven, heavens, sky; 1a) visible heavens, sky; 1a1) as
abode of the stars; 1a2) as the visible universe, the sky, atmosphere,
etc; 1b) Heaven (as the abode of God);
#392 as [#1, #10, #200, #9, #1, #50, #70, #40, #1, #10] = aisthánomai
(G143): {UMBRA: #392 % #41 = #23} 1) to perceive; 1a) by the bodily
senses; 1b) *WITH* *THE* *MIND*, understand;
Given our understanding of noumenon as a neuro-linguistic concept with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) in being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]) against which is made a resonance
as the subjective conception of phenomenal experience.
#369 - HUMAN DISCRIMINATING NORM:
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its
noumenon: 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF and the #728 - MORPHOS
#41 = #21} 1) the form by which a person or thing strikes the vision; 2)
external appearance;
The notion of technique and thought as 'works of the mind' asserts
Cortese (2016, p 13), are equally viable and vital components of the
human condition which is met with much less resistance than the notion
that technology is so. Perhaps merely because technique and methodology
cannot be physically separated from the mind (except when it is embodied
in technology), and could not continue existing if humanity went extinct
tomorrow – in contrast to technology, which could do both.
We would intuitively ask the question relative to the anthropocentric
(ie. human being as the central or most important element of existence)
characteristic:
Whether mind is constituted by a sensibility of determinism as cognitive
process of apprehension assisted by a ratiocination construct (ie.
theory that the universe is utterly rational: 22 / 7) such as #2184 -
anthropologic cosmogonic principle?
#2184 x 49 = 107,016 days (294 x 364)
107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126 tropical year
As considerations of methodological self-determination as autogenic
thoughts steering morphogenic knots, Cortese (2016, p 8) states that one
of the ways humans (organisms generally) change the wiring of their
brains is in response to thought and perception which constitute a
modality of self-determination in and of themselves, insofar as they can
facilitate changes to the material systems and processes underlying our
brains, thereby facilitating the modification of our emergent
intellectual and experiential capacities and faculties constituted thereby.
If we consider the ontic root @168: @1 + METALOGIC #8 - AUTONOMOUS
DELIMITER (#27) in light of the HEGEL / MARX dialectic formulations
which convey a septet basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 / 7
then the central unifying principle is the actuation of an ONTIC
grounding as then a @6 - formula of progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for
consciousness emergence:
28 x 6,
24 x 7,
#168 x #13 = #2184
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
#0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1 ---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
#2184 / 5 = #436 + #4 - IMPERATIVE FOR JUDGMENTS
My informal research intuition is of #0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1
---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT relating to #414 / #622 - METASTASIS
being anchored #0 ---> upon the *PERIHELION* of 3 JANUARY ---> and #288
/ #325 / #436 - COHESION occurring from that point as then capable in
having #1 ---> #2184 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE OVERSIGHT.
Cortese (2016, p 9) does not conceive of any involvement of noumenon as
the basis for perception as inherent to the ontological notion of
sapience in being human. Which is apparent in his regard for criticism
such as the notion, that unlike thought, which is internal to self,
perception whether rational or irrational would fail to constitute a
modality or means of self-determination because it is initiated from
systems and processes external to the self.
WE POSTULATE AS DUALITY (GOOD / EVIL) THAT THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO
INSTANCE MODELS OF @168 - ONTIC CONSCIOUSNESS EMERGENCE
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
Moreover, Cortese (2016, p 9) states the line between thought and
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
perception is indistinct and, we would argue, more a pragmatic tool than
a real ontological truth as-such. When we think on a conscious level, we
employ sensory impressions to convey or “embody” the informational
substrata of our thoughts – whether by way of visualizing a process
being articulated through time or the relative organization of
components and/or sequences of events, or via the explicit use of words
(i.e. “thinking in sentences”).
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing
of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a
car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an
earlier experience of a *BOMB* *BLAST*) is a priori and transitional
towards it's final comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and
correct orthography or a #416 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *LAW* ('OTH CYCLE: #364
+ #312 + #416 = #1092) as then the basis for its apprehension as
Category of Understanding.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as
elimination--is the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring
knowledge and explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's subsequent
refinement until it was satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence:
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
Thusly perception is inherent, such that confusion like fear and
paranoia which steadfastly and habitually refuses to overcome its
ignorant state by informing itself, can then be considered delusional.
CONCLUSION
If the ONOMANTIC basis of binomial number has its root in MIND / SCIENCE
and OPINION / SENSE, then (Cortese: 2016, p 13) claim to avoid such
distinctions between device and mind or thought and perception as is
then rhetorical artifice which is ignorant of trinomial number and a
denial of essential attribute of anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
Our simple case study as "fire evacuee" --> "something terrible
happened" change dynamic which quantifies the metalogic basis is a
rational neurological representation of data for which we ought now make
consideration of Shelli Joye's overview of field theories of
consciousness which support the idea that the electromagnetic field
itself is the basis of consciousness and that this source of
consciousness peers out into the space-time universe through our human
sensory systems.
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
Initial Post: 23 August 2021
dolf
Aug 26, 2021, 9:24:46 PM8/26/21
to
-- (DRAFT) METHODOLOGICAL SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS
STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2021
Before we continue with the implementation of our noetic lexicon
navigation within the GRUMBLE prototype, we ought to make self educated
STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2021
Before we continue with the implementation of our noetic lexicon
NOETIC LEXICON COGNITION {IDEA #206 - môwʻêd (H4150): *APPOINTED*
*TIME*; *SACRED* *SEASON* AS #THREE / #342 AS #FOUR - PYTHAGOREAN
#206 - NOETIC LEXICON vCOGNITION as [#6, #30, #40, #6, #70, #4, #10,
#600] /
#124 as [#40, #70, #4, #10] = môwʻêd (H4150): {UMBRA: #120 % #41 = #38}
1) appointed place, appointed time, meeting; 1a) appointed time; 1a1)
appointed time (general); 1a2) *SACRED* *SEASON*, *SET* *FEAST*,
*APPOINTED* *SEASON*; 1b) appointed meeting; 1c) appointed place; 1d)
appointed sign or signal; 1e) tent of meeting;
#124 as [#70, #30, #10, #3, #1, #10] = olígos (G3641): {UMBRA: #383 %
#41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or
size; 1b) *OF* *TIME*: *SHORT*; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;
#59 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
#124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
#24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a) to be resolved or
determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;
YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.
#41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or
size; 1b) *OF* *TIME*: *SHORT*; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;
#59 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
#124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
#24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a) to be resolved or
determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;
YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
#1 - 21 DECEMBER
#21 - 21 MARCH
#41 - 21 JUNE
#61 - 23 SEPTEMBER
#401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive
epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right time;
2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of the
times, the things and events of time;
I AM AFRAID FOR YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:9-11]
Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and
Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
causality pertaining to the role of emergence in the creation of
#21 - 21 MARCH
#41 - 21 JUNE
#61 - 23 SEPTEMBER
#401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive
epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right time;
2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of the
times, the things and events of time;
I AM AFRAID FOR YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:9-11]
Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and
Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
consciousness that has been debated for over a century, but it remains
unresolved. In particular there is controversy over the claim that a
“strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal
consciousness.
“strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal
consciousness.
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
#225 as [#5, #3, #2, #10, #200, #5] = gᵉbîyrâh (H1377): {UMBRA: #220 %
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its
noumenon: 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF and the #728 - MORPHOS
#728 as [#40, #70, #100, #500, #8, #10] = morphḗ (G3444): {UMBRA: #718 %
#41 = #21} 1) the form by which a person or thing strikes the vision; 2)
external appearance;
The notion of technique and thought as 'works of the mind' asserts
Cortese (2016, p 13), are equally viable and vital components of the
human condition which is met with much less resistance than the notion
that technology is so. Perhaps merely because technique and methodology
cannot be physically separated from the mind (except when it is embodied
in technology), and could not continue existing if humanity went extinct
tomorrow – in contrast to technology, which could do both.
We would intuitively ask the question relative to the anthropocentric
(ie. human being as the central or most important element of existence)
characteristic:
Whether mind is constituted by a sensibility of determinism as cognitive
process of apprehension assisted by a ratiocination construct (ie.
theory that the universe is utterly rational: 22 / 7) such as #2184 -
anthropologic cosmogonic principle?
#2184 x 49 = 107,016 days (294 x 364)
107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126 tropical year
In considerations of methodological self-determination as autogenic
#728 as [#40, #70, #100, #500, #8, #10] = morphḗ (G3444): {UMBRA: #718 %
#41 = #21} 1) the form by which a person or thing strikes the vision; 2)
external appearance;
The notion of technique and thought as 'works of the mind' asserts
Cortese (2016, p 13), are equally viable and vital components of the
human condition which is met with much less resistance than the notion
that technology is so. Perhaps merely because technique and methodology
cannot be physically separated from the mind (except when it is embodied
in technology), and could not continue existing if humanity went extinct
tomorrow – in contrast to technology, which could do both.
We would intuitively ask the question relative to the anthropocentric
(ie. human being as the central or most important element of existence)
characteristic:
Whether mind is constituted by a sensibility of determinism as cognitive
process of apprehension assisted by a ratiocination construct (ie.
theory that the universe is utterly rational: 22 / 7) such as #2184 -
anthropologic cosmogonic principle?
#2184 x 49 = 107,016 days (294 x 364)
107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126 tropical year
thoughts steering morphogenic knots, Cortese (2016, p 8) states that one
of the ways humans (organisms generally) change the wiring of their
brains is in response to thought and perception which constitute a
modality of self-determination in and of themselves, insofar as they can
facilitate changes to the material systems and processes underlying our
brains, thereby facilitating the modification of our emergent
intellectual and experiential capacities and faculties constituted thereby.
If we consider the ontic root @168: @1 + METALOGIC #8 - AUTONOMOUS
of the ways humans (organisms generally) change the wiring of their
brains is in response to thought and perception which constitute a
modality of self-determination in and of themselves, insofar as they can
facilitate changes to the material systems and processes underlying our
brains, thereby facilitating the modification of our emergent
intellectual and experiential capacities and faculties constituted thereby.
DELIMITER (#27) in light of HEGEL / MARX dialectic formulations which
convey a septet basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 / 7 then
the central unifying principle is the actuation of an ONTIC grounding as
then a @6 - formula of progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness
emergence:
28 x 6,
24 x 7,
21 x 8 = #168
#168 x #13 = #2184
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
#0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1 ---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
#2184 / 5 = #436 + #4 - IMPERATIVE FOR JUDGMENTS
My informal research intuition is of #0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1
---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT relating to #414 / #622 - METASTASIS
being anchored #0 ---> upon the *PERIHELION* of 3 JANUARY ---> and #288
/ #325 / #436 - COHESION occurring from that point as then capable in
having #1 ---> #2184 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE OVERSIGHT.
Cortese (2016, p 9) does not conceive of any involvement of noumenon as
the basis for perception as inherent to the ontological notion of
sapience in being human. Which is apparent in his regard for criticism
such as the notion, that unlike thought, which is internal to self,
perception whether rational or irrational would fail to constitute a
modality or means of self-determination because it is initiated from
systems and processes external to the self.
WE POSTULATE AS DUALITY (GOOD / EVIL) THAT THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO
#168 x #13 = #2184
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
#0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1 ---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
#2184 / 5 = #436 + #4 - IMPERATIVE FOR JUDGMENTS
My informal research intuition is of #0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1
---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT relating to #414 / #622 - METASTASIS
being anchored #0 ---> upon the *PERIHELION* of 3 JANUARY ---> and #288
/ #325 / #436 - COHESION occurring from that point as then capable in
having #1 ---> #2184 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE OVERSIGHT.
Cortese (2016, p 9) does not conceive of any involvement of noumenon as
the basis for perception as inherent to the ontological notion of
sapience in being human. Which is apparent in his regard for criticism
such as the notion, that unlike thought, which is internal to self,
perception whether rational or irrational would fail to constitute a
modality or means of self-determination because it is initiated from
systems and processes external to the self.
INSTANCE MODELS OF @168 - ONTIC CONSCIOUSNESS EMERGENCE
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
rational neurological representation of data for which we ought now make
consideration of Shelli Joye's overview of field theories of
consciousness which support the idea that the electromagnetic field
itself is the basis of consciousness and that this source of
consciousness peers out into the space-time universe through our human
sensory systems.
consideration of Shelli Joye's overview of field theories of
consciousness which support the idea that the electromagnetic field
itself is the basis of consciousness and that this source of
consciousness peers out into the space-time universe through our human
sensory systems.
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Self%20Determination.pdf>
Initial Post: 23 August 2021
dolf
Aug 27, 2021, 8:10:57 PM8/27/21
to
-- METHODOLOGICAL SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING
#124 as [#40, #70, #4, #10] = môwʻêd (H4150): {UMBRA: #120 % #41 = #38}
consciousness that has been debated for over a century, but it remains
46 41 48
47 45 43
42 49 44 = #135 / #405 {FIRE - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN*
*ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS NORTH}
42 47 46
49 45 41
44 43 48 = #135 / #405 {EARTH - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN*
*ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS EAST}
44 49 42
43 45 47
48 41 46 = #135 / #405 {AIR - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN* *ONOMANTIC*
*BELIEF* AS SOUTH}
48 48 44
41 45 49
46 47 42 = #135 / #405 {WATER - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN*
*ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS WEST}
In making a nomenclature consideration of #45 - METHODOLOGY the #CENTRE
of value PROPOSITION is that any DELIMITER is relative to the AUTONOMOUS
PRINCIPLE, thereby as a METATHEORY OF LOGIC is a stratum as dialectic of
meta-descriptor prototypes which always precedes it.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9 - PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE {4+5 =
#9, 1+3+5 = #9, 4+0+5 = #9}
beasts and sacrifices the space of 40 years in the wilderness” [Acts 7:42]
The background geometric image is the "Flower of Life" from ABYDOS which
is 971 km away from Jerusalem.
The "Star of David" geometric image was known to Pythagoras during
Babylonian captivity some 871 km away from Jerusalem.
Is irrefutable proof that “Jerusalem and the temple” is Jewish as #509 -
YAHAD.

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Kabbalistic_Circle.jpg>
"... FIGURES WHICH YOU MADE TO WORSHIP THEM: AND I SHALL CARRY YOU
BEYOND BABYLON / DAMASCUS (#YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLLS COMMUNITY)." [Acts
7:43, Amos 5:27]
convey a septet basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 / 7 then
the central unifying principle is the actuation of an ONTIC grounding as
28 x 6,
24 x 7,
and OPINION / SENSE, then Cortese's (2016, p 13) claim to avoid such
distinctions between device and mind or thought and perception is then a
rhetorical artifice which is ignorant of trinomial number or noumenon
and a denial of the essential attribute of anthropology: homo[ios]
sapien[s | t]. Our simple case study as "fire evacuee" --> "something
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgklHsomlXw>
"WHO HATH DELIVERED US FROM THE POWER OF DARKNESS {ie.
"But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness,
and despise government-G2963. Presumptuous are they, self-willed, they
are not afraid to speak evil of dignities." [2Peter 2:10]
}, AND HATH TRANSLATED US INTO THE KINGDOM OF HIS DEAR SON: IN WHOM WE
HAVE REDEMPTION {ie. #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY} THROUGH HIS
BLOOD {ie. CRUCIFIED AS KING OF THE JEWS ON #509 - FRIDAY 3 APRIL 33
AD}, EVEN THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS {ie. #509 - REPROACHES FOR THE CAUSE
OF CHRIST}: WHO IS THE IMAGE OF THE INVISIBLE GOD, THE FIRSTBORN OF
EVERY CREATURE: FOR BY HIM WERE ALL THINGS CREATED, THAT ARE IN HEAVEN,
AND THAT ARE IN EARTH, VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE, WHETHER THEY BE THRONES,
OR *DOMINIONS*-G2963, OR PRINCIPALITIES, OR POWERS: ALL THINGS WERE
CREATED BY HIM, AND FOR HIM: AND HE IS BEFORE ALL THINGS, AND BY HIM ALL
THINGS CONSIST." [Colossians 1:13-17]
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Self%20Determination.pdf>
Initial Post: 23 August 2021
MORPHOGENIC KNOTS
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2021
Before we continue with the implementation of our noetic lexicon
navigation within the GRUMBLE prototype, we ought to make a self
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2021
Before we continue with the implementation of our noetic lexicon
1) appointed place, appointed time, meeting; 1a) appointed time; 1a1)
appointed time (general); 1a2) *SACRED* *SEASON*, *SET* *FEAST*,
*APPOINTED* *SEASON*; 1b) appointed meeting; 1c) appointed place; 1d)
appointed sign or signal; 1e) tent of meeting;
#124 as [#70, #30, #10, #3, #1, #10] = olígos (G3641): {UMBRA: #383 %
#41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or
size; 1b) *OF* *TIME*: *SHORT*; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;
#59 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
#124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
#24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a) to be resolved or
determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;
YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.
#41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or
size; 1b) *OF* *TIME*: *SHORT*; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;
#59 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
#124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
#24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a) to be resolved or
determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;
YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
#1 - 21 DECEMBER
#21 - 21 MARCH
#41 - 21 JUNE
#61 - 23 SEPTEMBER
#401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive
epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right time;
2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of the
times, the things and events of time;
I AM AFRAID FOR YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:9-11]
Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and
Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
causality pertaining to the role of emergence in the creation of
#21 - 21 MARCH
#41 - 21 JUNE
#61 - 23 SEPTEMBER
#401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive
epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right time;
2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of the
times, the things and events of time;
I AM AFRAID FOR YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:9-11]
Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and
Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
consciousness that has been debated for over a century, but it remains
unresolved. In particular there is controversy over the claim that a
“strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal
consciousness:
“strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal
46 41 48
47 45 43
42 49 44 = #135 / #405 {FIRE - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN*
*ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS NORTH}
42 47 46
49 45 41
44 43 48 = #135 / #405 {EARTH - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN*
*ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS EAST}
44 49 42
43 45 47
48 41 46 = #135 / #405 {AIR - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN* *ONOMANTIC*
*BELIEF* AS SOUTH}
48 48 44
41 45 49
46 47 42 = #135 / #405 {WATER - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN*
*ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS WEST}
In making a nomenclature consideration of #45 - METHODOLOGY the #CENTRE
of value PROPOSITION is that any DELIMITER is relative to the AUTONOMOUS
PRINCIPLE, thereby as a METATHEORY OF LOGIC is a stratum as dialectic of
meta-descriptor prototypes which always precedes it.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9, 1+3+5 = #9, 4+0+5 = #9}
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
#225 as [#5, #3, #2, #10, #200, #5] = gᵉbîyrâh (H1377): {UMBRA: #220 %
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
The background geometric image is the "Flower of Life" from ABYDOS which
is 971 km away from Jerusalem.
The "Star of David" geometric image was known to Pythagoras during
Babylonian captivity some 871 km away from Jerusalem.
Is irrefutable proof that “Jerusalem and the temple” is Jewish as #509 -
YAHAD.

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Kabbalistic_Circle.jpg>
"... FIGURES WHICH YOU MADE TO WORSHIP THEM: AND I SHALL CARRY YOU
7:43, Amos 5:27]
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its
the central unifying principle is the actuation of an ONTIC grounding as
then a @6 - formula of progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness
emergence:
28 x 6,
24 x 7,
21 x 8 = #168
#168 x #13 = #2184
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
#0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1 ---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
#2184 / 5 = #436 + #4 - IMPERATIVE FOR JUDGMENTS
My informal research intuition is of #0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1
---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT relating to #414 / #622 - METASTASIS
being anchored #0 ---> upon the *PERIHELION* of 3 JANUARY ---> and #288
/ #325 / #436 - COHESION occurring from that point as then capable in
having #1 ---> #2184 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE OVERSIGHT.
Cortese (2016, p 9) does not conceive of any involvement of noumenon as
the basis for perception as inherent to the ontological notion of
sapience in being human. Which is apparent in his regard for criticism
such as the notion, that unlike thought, which is internal to self,
perception whether rational or irrational would fail to constitute a
modality or means of self-determination because it is initiated from
systems and processes external to the self.
WE POSTULATE AS DUALITY (GOOD / EVIL) THAT THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO
#168 x #13 = #2184
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
#0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1 ---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
#2184 / 5 = #436 + #4 - IMPERATIVE FOR JUDGMENTS
My informal research intuition is of #0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1
---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT relating to #414 / #622 - METASTASIS
being anchored #0 ---> upon the *PERIHELION* of 3 JANUARY ---> and #288
/ #325 / #436 - COHESION occurring from that point as then capable in
having #1 ---> #2184 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE OVERSIGHT.
Cortese (2016, p 9) does not conceive of any involvement of noumenon as
the basis for perception as inherent to the ontological notion of
sapience in being human. Which is apparent in his regard for criticism
such as the notion, that unlike thought, which is internal to self,
perception whether rational or irrational would fail to constitute a
modality or means of self-determination because it is initiated from
systems and processes external to the self.
INSTANCE MODELS OF @168 - ONTIC CONSCIOUSNESS EMERGENCE
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
distinctions between device and mind or thought and perception is then a
rhetorical artifice which is ignorant of trinomial number or noumenon
and a denial of the essential attribute of anthropology: homo[ios]
sapien[s | t]. Our simple case study as "fire evacuee" --> "something
terrible happened" change dynamic which quantifies the metalogic basis
as a rational neurological data representation for which we ought now
make consideration of Shelli Joye's overview of field theories of
consciousness which support the idea that the electromagnetic field
itself is the basis of consciousness and that this source of
consciousness peers out into the space-time universe through our human
sensory systems.
YOUTUBE: "GREGORIAN - FADED"
consciousness which support the idea that the electromagnetic field
itself is the basis of consciousness and that this source of
consciousness peers out into the space-time universe through our human
sensory systems.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgklHsomlXw>
"WHO HATH DELIVERED US FROM THE POWER OF DARKNESS {ie.
"But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness,
and despise government-G2963. Presumptuous are they, self-willed, they
are not afraid to speak evil of dignities." [2Peter 2:10]
}, AND HATH TRANSLATED US INTO THE KINGDOM OF HIS DEAR SON: IN WHOM WE
HAVE REDEMPTION {ie. #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY} THROUGH HIS
BLOOD {ie. CRUCIFIED AS KING OF THE JEWS ON #509 - FRIDAY 3 APRIL 33
AD}, EVEN THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS {ie. #509 - REPROACHES FOR THE CAUSE
OF CHRIST}: WHO IS THE IMAGE OF THE INVISIBLE GOD, THE FIRSTBORN OF
EVERY CREATURE: FOR BY HIM WERE ALL THINGS CREATED, THAT ARE IN HEAVEN,
AND THAT ARE IN EARTH, VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE, WHETHER THEY BE THRONES,
OR *DOMINIONS*-G2963, OR PRINCIPALITIES, OR POWERS: ALL THINGS WERE
CREATED BY HIM, AND FOR HIM: AND HE IS BEFORE ALL THINGS, AND BY HIM ALL
THINGS CONSIST." [Colossians 1:13-17]
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
Initial Post: 23 August 2021
dolf
Aug 27, 2021, 9:10:15 PM8/27/21
to
1) appointed place, appointed time, meeting; 1a) appointed time; 1a1)
appointed time (general); 1a2) *SACRED* *SEASON*, *SET* *FEAST*,
*APPOINTED* *SEASON*; 1b) appointed meeting; 1c) appointed place; 1d)
appointed sign or signal; 1e) tent of meeting;
#124 as [#70, #30, #10, #3, #1, #10] = olígos (G3641): {UMBRA: #383 %
#41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or
size; 1b) *OF* *TIME*: *SHORT*; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;
#59 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
#124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
#24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a) to be resolved or
determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;
YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.
#41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or
size; 1b) *OF* *TIME*: *SHORT*; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;
#59 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
#124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
#24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a) to be resolved or
determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;
YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
#1 - 21 DECEMBER
#21 - 21 MARCH
#41 - 21 JUNE
#61 - 23 SEPTEMBER
#401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive
epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right time;
2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of the
times, the things and events of time;
I AM AFRAID FOR YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:9-11]
Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and
Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
causality pertaining to the role of emergence in the creation of
#21 - 21 MARCH
#41 - 21 JUNE
#61 - 23 SEPTEMBER
#401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive
epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right time;
2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of the
times, the things and events of time;
I AM AFRAID FOR YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:9-11]
Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and
Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
consciousness that has been debated for over a century, but it remains
unresolved. In particular there is controversy over the claim that a
“strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal
“strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u-4EQP4kzk>
#168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE as [#100, #10, #7, #1, #50] /
#325 as [#100, #10, #7, #8, #200] = rhíza (G4491): {UMBRA: #118 % #41 =
#36} 1) a *ROOT*; 2) that which like a root springs from a root, a
sprout, shoot; 3) metaph. offspring, progeny;
#434 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#7, #8, #200, #5, #200, #9, #5] /
#225 as [#7, #8, #10, #200] /
#325 as [#5, #7, #8, #300, #5] = záō (G2198): {UMBRA: #808 % #41 = #29}
1) to live, breathe, be among the living (not lifeless, not dead); 2) to
enjoy real life; 2a) to have true life and worthy of the name; 2b)
active, blessed, endless in the kingdom of God; 3) to live i.e. pass
life, in the manner of the living and acting; 3a) of mortals or
character; 4) living water, having vital power in itself and exerting
the same upon the soul; 5) metaph. to be in full vigour; 5a) to be
fresh, strong, efficient,; 5b) as adj. active, powerful, efficacious;
#225 as [#5, #3, #2, #10, #200, #5] = gᵉbîyrâh (H1377): {UMBRA: #220 %
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its
the central unifying principle is the actuation of an ONTIC grounding as
then a @6 - formula of progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness
emergence:
28 x 6,
24 x 7,
21 x 8 = #168
#168 x #13 = #2184
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
#0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1 ---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
#2184 / 5 = #436 + #4 - IMPERATIVE FOR JUDGMENTS
My informal research intuition is of #0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1
---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT relating to #414 / #622 - METASTASIS
being anchored #0 ---> upon the *PERIHELION* of 3 JANUARY ---> and #288
/ #325 / #436 - COHESION occurring from that point as then capable in
having #1 ---> #2184 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE OVERSIGHT.
Cortese (2016, p 9) does not conceive of any involvement of noumenon as
the basis for perception as inherent to the ontological notion of
sapience in being human. Which is apparent in his regard for criticism
such as the notion, that unlike thought, which is internal to self,
perception whether rational or irrational would fail to constitute a
modality or means of self-determination because it is initiated from
systems and processes external to the self.
WE POSTULATE AS DUALITY (GOOD / EVIL) THAT THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO
#168 x #13 = #2184
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
#0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1 ---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
#2184 / 5 = #436 + #4 - IMPERATIVE FOR JUDGMENTS
My informal research intuition is of #0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1
---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT relating to #414 / #622 - METASTASIS
being anchored #0 ---> upon the *PERIHELION* of 3 JANUARY ---> and #288
/ #325 / #436 - COHESION occurring from that point as then capable in
having #1 ---> #2184 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE OVERSIGHT.
Cortese (2016, p 9) does not conceive of any involvement of noumenon as
the basis for perception as inherent to the ontological notion of
sapience in being human. Which is apparent in his regard for criticism
such as the notion, that unlike thought, which is internal to self,
perception whether rational or irrational would fail to constitute a
modality or means of self-determination because it is initiated from
systems and processes external to the self.
INSTANCE MODELS OF @168 - ONTIC CONSCIOUSNESS EMERGENCE
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}
@102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}
@168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@196 = #511 (ontic example)
@168 - BINOMIAL (#CENTRE: 8) APPARATUS
@215 - @1 - SELF CONTRADICTION (#288 - #73)
@130 - WHAT NATURE OF MIND?
@147 = #660 (ontic example)
+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE}
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Self%20Determination.pdf>
Initial Post: 23 August 2021
dolf
Oct 26, 2021, 4:26:04 AM10/26/21
to
— CONSIDERING COLIN POWELL’S IRAQ WAR JUSTIFICATION IN LIGHT OF A
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/23/opinion/colin-powell-legacy.html>
The answer to this conundrum: “he broke so many [rules] when he drove his
tank off the cliff known as Iraq.” <— NOTE WE ARE RESPONDING TO A
JOURNALIST’S ABSURDITY
Is simply a pragmatic consideration of the semantical PRISM between these
three notions:
a) Existentialism;
b) Nihilism;
c) Absurdism.
Existentialists believe the world intrinsically has no objective meaning
similar to nihilists, but through a combination of free will, awareness,
and personality responsibility we can, and in some views should, create our
own subjective meaning in life.
Absurdism is one of these such responses.
[π, {@1: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN
(#80)}
ρ, {@2: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24}); Ego: 19
- FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#99)}
ι, {@3: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#126); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#109)}
ς, {@4: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE
{%39}); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#147 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%21})}
μ, {@5: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#217); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#187)}
α] {@6: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#243); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#188)}
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #245
MALE: @98 = #98
FEME: @147 = #147
#245 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] = logízomai (G3049):
{UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1) to reckon, count, compute, calculate, count
over; 1a) to take into account, to make an account of; 1a1) metaph. to pass
to one's account, to impute; 1a2) a thing is reckoned as or to be
something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to something, as having the
like force and weight; 1b) to number among, reckon with; 1c) to reckon or
account;
2) TO RECKON INWARD, COUNT UP OR WEIGH THE REASONS, TO DELIBERATE;
3) by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer; 3a) to consider,
take into account, weigh, meditate on; 3b) to suppose, deem, judge; 3c) to
determine, purpose, decide;
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #192
MALE: @192 = #192
CHECKSUM TOTAL: #245 + #192 = #437
#437 as [#5, #3, #20, #100, #1, #300, #8] = enkratḗs (G1468): {UMBRA: #637
% #41 = #22} 1) strong, robust; 2) having power over, possessed of (a
thing); 3) mastering, controlling, curbing, restraining; 3a) controlling
one's self, temperate, continent;
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as
to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within the
21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the Iraq
war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey an
existential problem as foundation to western philosophy.
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK THAT
MIND (#VIRTUE): #1 - APO: G575 (@150) + #2 - DIDOMI: G1325 (@104)
SCIENCE (#TOOLS): #3 - POIEO: G4160 (@175) + #4 - APODIDOMI: G591 (@181)
OPINION (#POSITION): #5 - EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228) + #6 - APOGRÁPHŌ: G583
(@86)
SENSE (#TIME): #7 - ARÉTĒ: G703 (@102) + #8 - TÉCHNĒ: G5078 (@171)
Initial Post: 24 October 2021
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/23/opinion/colin-powell-legacy.html>
The answer to this conundrum: “he broke so many [rules] when he drove his
tank off the cliff known as Iraq.” <— NOTE WE ARE RESPONDING TO A
JOURNALIST’S ABSURDITY
Is simply a pragmatic consideration of the semantical PRISM between these
three notions:
a) Existentialism;
b) Nihilism;
c) Absurdism.
Existentialists believe the world intrinsically has no objective meaning
similar to nihilists, but through a combination of free will, awareness,
and personality responsibility we can, and in some views should, create our
own subjective meaning in life.
Absurdism is one of these such responses.
[π, {@1: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN
(#80)}
ρ, {@2: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24}); Ego: 19
- FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#99)}
ι, {@3: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#126); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#109)}
ς, {@4: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE
{%39}); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#147 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%21})}
μ, {@5: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#217); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#187)}
α] {@6: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#243); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#188)}
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #245
MALE: @98 = #98
FEME: @147 = #147
#245 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] = logízomai (G3049):
{UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1) to reckon, count, compute, calculate, count
over; 1a) to take into account, to make an account of; 1a1) metaph. to pass
to one's account, to impute; 1a2) a thing is reckoned as or to be
something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to something, as having the
like force and weight; 1b) to number among, reckon with; 1c) to reckon or
account;
2) TO RECKON INWARD, COUNT UP OR WEIGH THE REASONS, TO DELIBERATE;
3) by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer; 3a) to consider,
take into account, weigh, meditate on; 3b) to suppose, deem, judge; 3c) to
determine, purpose, decide;
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #192
MALE: @192 = #192
CHECKSUM TOTAL: #245 + #192 = #437
#437 as [#5, #3, #20, #100, #1, #300, #8] = enkratḗs (G1468): {UMBRA: #637
% #41 = #22} 1) strong, robust; 2) having power over, possessed of (a
thing); 3) mastering, controlling, curbing, restraining; 3a) controlling
one's self, temperate, continent;
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as
to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within the
21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the Iraq
war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey an
existential problem as foundation to western philosophy.
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK THAT
SCIENCE (#TOOLS): #3 - POIEO: G4160 (@175) + #4 - APODIDOMI: G591 (@181)
OPINION (#POSITION): #5 - EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228) + #6 - APOGRÁPHŌ: G583
(@86)
SENSE (#TIME): #7 - ARÉTĒ: G703 (@102) + #8 - TÉCHNĒ: G5078 (@171)
Initial Post: 24 October 2021
dolf
Nov 5, 2021, 5:44:36 PM11/5/21
to
This is an excerpt from the document titled "METHODOLOGICAL
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
CONSIDERING COLIN POWELL’S IRAQ WAR JUSTIFICATION IN LIGHT OF A
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
The statement is relevant to defeatist notion of Colin Powell's (April
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.

<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/23/opinion/colin-powell-legacy.html>
The answer to this conundrum: “He broke so many [rules] when he drove
(a thing); 3) MASTERING, CONTROLLING, CURBING, RESTRAINING; 3a)
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
“…THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER-EXOUSÍA [AT ALL] AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN-DIDOMI THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE THAT
DELIVERED-PARADIDOMI ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.” [John 19:11 (KJV)]
#746 as [#5, #60, #70, #400, #200, #10, #1] = exousía (G1849): {UMBRA:
#746 % #41 = #8} 1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases;
1a) leave or permission; 2) physical and mental power; 2a) the ability
or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or
exercises; 3) the power of authority (influence) and of right
(privilege); 4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose
will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed); 4a)
universally; 4a1) authority over mankind; 4b) specifically; 4b1) the
power of judicial decisions; 4b2) of authority to manage domestic
affairs; 4c) metonymically; 4c1) a thing subject to authority or rule;
i) jurisdiction; 4c2) one who possesses authority; i) a ruler, a human
magistrate; ii) the leading and more powerful among created beings
superior to man, spiritual potentates; 4c3) A SIGN OF THE HUSBAND'S
AUTHORITY OVER HIS WIFE; i) THE VEIL WITH WHICH PROPRIETY REQUIRED A
WOMEN TO COVER HERSELF; 4c4) the sign of regal authority, a crown;
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC JINGOISTIC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
@200, {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG
(#125)} <-- SECTION III
- MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
SECTION VII - And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said Governor
General out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our Lieutenant Governor of Our
said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such Lieutenant Governor in
Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the
Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such
Lieutenant Governor, or such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY
SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE OATHS APPOINTED to be taken by the Governor General
of Our said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
#4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078 which we understand with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
CONSIDERING COLIN POWELL’S IRAQ WAR JUSTIFICATION IN LIGHT OF A
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.

<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/23/opinion/colin-powell-legacy.html>
The answer to this conundrum: “He broke so many [rules] when he drove
controlling one's self, temperate, continent;
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
its existential problem related to the foundations of Western Philosophy.
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
WERE GIVEN-DIDOMI THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE THAT
DELIVERED-PARADIDOMI ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.” [John 19:11 (KJV)]
#746 as [#5, #60, #70, #400, #200, #10, #1] = exousía (G1849): {UMBRA:
#746 % #41 = #8} 1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases;
1a) leave or permission; 2) physical and mental power; 2a) the ability
or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or
exercises; 3) the power of authority (influence) and of right
(privilege); 4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose
will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed); 4a)
universally; 4a1) authority over mankind; 4b) specifically; 4b1) the
power of judicial decisions; 4b2) of authority to manage domestic
affairs; 4c) metonymically; 4c1) a thing subject to authority or rule;
i) jurisdiction; 4c2) one who possesses authority; i) a ruler, a human
magistrate; ii) the leading and more powerful among created beings
superior to man, spiritual potentates; 4c3) A SIGN OF THE HUSBAND'S
AUTHORITY OVER HIS WIFE; i) THE VEIL WITH WHICH PROPRIETY REQUIRED A
WOMEN TO COVER HERSELF; 4c4) the sign of regal authority, a crown;
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
(#125)} <-- SECTION III
@186, {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
@84, {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746 - exousía (G1849)); Ego: 3
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
- MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
SECTION VII - And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said Governor
General out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our Lieutenant Governor of Our
said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such Lieutenant Governor in
Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the
Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such
Lieutenant Governor, or such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY
SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE OATHS APPOINTED to be taken by the Governor General
of Our said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
#4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
@86, {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224)} <-- SECTION VIII
@177, {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA
(#239)} <-- SECTION IX
@140] {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU
(#298)} <-- SECTION X
dolf
Nov 6, 2021, 12:18:02 AM11/6/21
to
APPENDIX - ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
This is an excerpt from the document titled "METHODOLOGICAL
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078 which we understand with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
The answer to this conundrum: “He broke so many [rules] when he drove
(a thing); 3) MASTERING, CONTROLLING, CURBING, RESTRAINING; 3a)
#746 as [#5, #60, #70, #400, #200, #10, #1] = exousía (G1849): {UMBRA:
#746 % #41 = #8} 1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases;
1a) leave or permission; 2) physical and mental power; 2a) the ability
or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or
exercises; 3) the power of authority (influence) and of right
(privilege); 4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose
will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed); 4a)
universally; 4a1) authority over mankind; 4b) specifically; 4b1) the
power of judicial decisions; 4b2) of authority to manage domestic
affairs; 4c) metonymically; 4c1) a thing subject to authority or rule;
i) jurisdiction; 4c2) one who possesses authority; i) a ruler, a human
magistrate; ii) the leading and more powerful among created beings
superior to man, spiritual potentates; 4c3) A SIGN OF THE HUSBAND'S
AUTHORITY OVER HIS WIFE; i) THE VEIL WITH WHICH PROPRIETY REQUIRED A
WOMEN TO COVER HERSELF; 4c4) the sign of regal authority, a crown;
(#125)} <-- SECTION III
- MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
SECTION VII - And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said Governor
General out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our Lieutenant Governor of Our
said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such Lieutenant Governor in
Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the
Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such
Lieutenant Governor, or such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY
SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE OATHS APPOINTED to be taken by the Governor General
of Our said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
#5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
LEXICON ENTRIES
@140] {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940: asphalḗs (G804):
certain, true; suited to confirm / emménō (G1696): to persevere in
anything, a state of mind); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298)} <-- SECTION X
SECTION X - AND WE DO FURTHER DIRECT AND ENJOIN THAT THESE OUR LETTERS
PATENT SHALL BE READ AND PROCLAIMED AT SUCH PLACE OR PLACES AS OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL *SHALL* *THINK* *FIT* WITHIN OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA.
This is an excerpt from the document titled "METHODOLOGICAL
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078 which we understand with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
CONSIDERING COLIN POWELL’S IRAQ WAR JUSTIFICATION IN LIGHT OF A
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
The statement is relevant to defeatist notion of Colin Powell's (April
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.

<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/23/opinion/colin-powell-legacy.html>
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.

The answer to this conundrum: “He broke so many [rules] when he drove
controlling one's self, temperate, continent;
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
its existential problem related to the foundations of Western Philosophy.
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
“…THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER-EXOUSÍA [AT ALL] AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN-DIDOMI THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE THAT
DELIVERED-PARADIDOMI ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.” [John 19:11]
WERE GIVEN-DIDOMI THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE THAT
#746 as [#5, #60, #70, #400, #200, #10, #1] = exousía (G1849): {UMBRA:
#746 % #41 = #8} 1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases;
1a) leave or permission; 2) physical and mental power; 2a) the ability
or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or
exercises; 3) the power of authority (influence) and of right
(privilege); 4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose
will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed); 4a)
universally; 4a1) authority over mankind; 4b) specifically; 4b1) the
power of judicial decisions; 4b2) of authority to manage domestic
affairs; 4c) metonymically; 4c1) a thing subject to authority or rule;
i) jurisdiction; 4c2) one who possesses authority; i) a ruler, a human
magistrate; ii) the leading and more powerful among created beings
superior to man, spiritual potentates; 4c3) A SIGN OF THE HUSBAND'S
AUTHORITY OVER HIS WIFE; i) THE VEIL WITH WHICH PROPRIETY REQUIRED A
WOMEN TO COVER HERSELF; 4c4) the sign of regal authority, a crown;
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
@200, {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
(#125)} <-- SECTION III
@186, {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
@84, {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746 - exousía (G1849)); Ego: 3
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
- MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
SECTION VII - And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said Governor
General out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our Lieutenant Governor of Our
said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such Lieutenant Governor in
Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the
Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such
Lieutenant Governor, or such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY
SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE OATHS APPOINTED to be taken by the Governor General
of Our said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
#4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
@86, {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224)} <-- SECTION VIII
@177, {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA
(#239)} <-- SECTION IX
#5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
LEXICON ENTRIES
certain, true; suited to confirm / emménō (G1696): to persevere in
anything, a state of mind); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298)} <-- SECTION X
SECTION X - AND WE DO FURTHER DIRECT AND ENJOIN THAT THESE OUR LETTERS
PATENT SHALL BE READ AND PROCLAIMED AT SUCH PLACE OR PLACES AS OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL *SHALL* *THINK* *FIT* WITHIN OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA.
dolf
Nov 7, 2021, 5:54:04 PM11/7/21
to
APPENDIX - ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
This is an excerpt from the document titled "METHODOLOGICAL
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078 which we understand with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
This is an excerpt from the document titled "METHODOLOGICAL
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078 which we understand with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
CONSIDERING COLIN POWELL’S IRAQ WAR JUSTIFICATION IN LIGHT OF A
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
The statement is relevant to defeatist notion of Colin Powell's (April
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.

<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/23/opinion/colin-powell-legacy.html>
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.

The answer to this conundrum: “He broke so many [rules] when he drove
controlling one's self, temperate, continent;
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
its existential problem related to the foundations of Western Philosophy.
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
“…THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER-EXOUSÍA [AT ALL] AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN-DIDOMI THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE THAT
DELIVERED-PARADIDOMI ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.” [John 19:11]
“...THE SON OF MAN SHALL BE BETRAYED UNTO THE CHIEF PRIESTS AND UNTO THE
WERE GIVEN-DIDOMI THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE THAT
DELIVERED-PARADIDOMI ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.” [John 19:11]
SCRIBES, AND THEY SHALL CONDEMN HIM TO DEATH, AND SHALL
DELIVER-PARADIDOMI HIM TO THE GENTILES TO MOCK-EMPAÍZŌ: G1702 (@157):
(compare: #940 as [#400, #70, #400, #70] = TAʻTUAʻ: H8595 (@130)), AND
TO SCOURGE, AND TO CRUCIFY HIM...” [Matthew 20:18]
#746 as [#5, #60, #70, #400, #200, #10, #1] = exousía (G1849): {UMBRA:
#746 % #41 = #8} 1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases;
1a) leave or permission; 2) physical and mental power; 2a) the ability
or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or
exercises; 3) the power of authority (influence) and of right
(privilege); 4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose
will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed); 4a)
universally; 4a1) authority over mankind; 4b) specifically; 4b1) the
power of judicial decisions; 4b2) of authority to manage domestic
affairs; 4c) metonymically; 4c1) a thing subject to authority or rule;
i) jurisdiction; 4c2) one who possesses authority; i) a ruler, a human
magistrate; ii) the leading and more powerful among created beings
superior to man, spiritual potentates; 4c3) A SIGN OF THE HUSBAND'S
AUTHORITY OVER HIS WIFE; i) THE VEIL WITH WHICH PROPRIETY REQUIRED A
WOMEN TO COVER HERSELF; 4c4) the sign of regal authority, a crown;
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
@200, {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
(#125)} <-- SECTION III
@186, {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
@84, {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746 - exousía (G1849)); Ego: 3
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
- MIRED: HSIEN (#219)} <-- SECTION VII
SECTION VII - And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said Governor
General out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our Lieutenant Governor of Our
said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such Lieutenant Governor in
Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the
Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such
Lieutenant Governor, or such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY
SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE OATHS APPOINTED to be taken by the Governor General
of Our said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
#4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
@86, {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224)} <-- SECTION VIII
@177, {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA
(#239)} <-- SECTION IX
#5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
LEXICON ENTRIES
@140] {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940: asphalḗs (G804):
certain, true; suited to confirm / emménō (G1696): to persevere in
anything, a state of mind); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298)} <-- SECTION X
SECTION X - AND WE DO FURTHER DIRECT AND ENJOIN THAT THESE OUR LETTERS
PATENT SHALL BE READ AND PROCLAIMED AT SUCH PLACE OR PLACES AS OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL *SHALL* *THINK* *FIT* WITHIN OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA.
certain, true; suited to confirm / emménō (G1696): to persevere in
anything, a state of mind); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298)} <-- SECTION X
SECTION X - AND WE DO FURTHER DIRECT AND ENJOIN THAT THESE OUR LETTERS
PATENT SHALL BE READ AND PROCLAIMED AT SUCH PLACE OR PLACES AS OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL *SHALL* *THINK* *FIT* WITHIN OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA.
dolf
Nov 7, 2021, 10:45:28 PM11/7/21
to
STATEMENT RELEVANT TO AN APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL
SAFETY ORDER AS CASE NUMBER L10182359 LISTED FOR A CONTESTED HEARING ON
11 NOVEMBER 2021 BY ALLEGED BREACHES AS CASE NUMBER M11048888.
Your Honour, this matter as originating CASE NUMBER: L10182359 has now
been before the COURTS for 18 months, as grounds for the interim
intervention order dated 20 FEBRUARY 2020 which in our prudent view are
predicated upon fabrications, misrepresentation and false assertions
against corroborated facts to the contrary.
Our considerations as COURT FILING dated 6 SEPTEMBER 2021 conveys the
claim that the PAIRED and PROXIMITY ACTIONS:
• Saint Patrick's Day #175 - MARION / MAGDALENE WOMAN WITH NAKED CHILD
statue unveiling;
• Oak Tree Planting on 27 OCTOBER 1934 (ie. same year the Sydney /
Melbourne War Memorials were opened) by the Duke of Gloucester;
• #48 - RITUAL (LI) x #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) associated with BOER WAR
#288 - memorial commemorations
Were made in support of IRISH REPUBLICAN ACTIVISM then attempting to
hijack the WORLD WAR ONE CENTENNIAL which is sustained by a #449 -
CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING as evidence (TETRAD #70 - SEVERANCE by #71 -
DOMINION matrix pairing) of intellectual property theft and an intention
to besiege my person, reputation and property.
The grounds for seeking ORDERS with either a confabulation of dates then
entirely misrepresents this reality or completely omits any reference to
the respectful and robust conversation which is evinced by my usage of
the term ma'am some five times and the disaffected person responding on
three occasions by usage of the term "DARLING" as an endearment.
The audio recording was necessary to avoid any incriminations or
recriminations as libellous claims to being THREATENING in any manner
whatsoever as unconscionable and irrational conduct falsely claimed by
the disaffected person:
SUBSEQUENT #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD STATUE DIALOG WITH ARTIST @ 1747
HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018
DOLF: "Just one more question if I may?
Did you get a planning permit for it?"
ARTIST: "Sorry my darling."
DOLF: "Did you get a planning permit for it?"
ARTIST: "Yes."
DOLF: "You did?"
ARTIST: "Yeah."
DOLF: "We were not notified about it."
ARTIST: "I'm sorry darling I don't know what you are on about because
I'm getting very scared."
DOLF: "Why should you be scared?"
ARTIST: "I'm scared of you..."
DOLF: "Why should you be ... I'm just asking you..."
ARTIST: "I'm just scared of you and I see you have been THREATENING."
DOLF: "I'm not being THREATENING at all ma'am."
ARTIST: "You are being THREATENING."
DOLF: "I'm not being THREATENING. I've got it on video tape so I don't
need to be THREATENING."
ARTIST: "Well you have just THREATENED me and I'm going to ring the police."
DOLF: "No I didn't thank-you."
Whereupon, when the falsehood of their having obtained a PLANNING PERMIT
was manifestly apparent, that they made their deceitfully false claims
of THREATENING conduct or having their SAFETY INFRINGED, as
contradiction it was conveyed to them that the conversation had been
recorded.
At no time were persons who might be adversely affected (ie. WE HAVE
FAMILY WAR HISTORY OF MARITAL INFIDELITY RESULTING IN AN ILLEGITIMATE
CHILD AND SUBSEQUENT SUICIDE OF OUR FATHER etc) by the installation of
the #175 - MARION / MAGDALENE WOMAN WITH NAKED CHILD STATUTE granted an
opportunity to have their reasonable objections or recommendations
('perhaps the school grounds with an existing memorial might be a better
situational premise') heard as then by means of a PLANNING PERMIT being
consideration of due process.
The claims of the disaffected person that I have repeated[ly] "ABUS[ED]
THE AFFECTED PERSON REGARDING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH" is a contemptuous
slander given the CHRISTMAS DAY remark was only a statement as to
reasonable cause for our 31 JULY 2017 lodgement against the NEIGHBOUR of
an APPLICATION FOR AN INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER AT THE SALE
MAGISTRATES COURT as CASE NUMBER H12143475 on the following immanent and
substantive grounds:
#3: ON 31.7.2017 AT 10AM [THE RESPONDENT] SHOWED ME A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE
MARION STATUE WITH[IN] THE PARK OPPOSITE WEARING A BALACLAVA AS TO
CONVEY OUR MUTUAL UNDERSTAND[ING] OF IT['S] PLACEMENT AS AN ATTEMPT [TO]
SUBVERT OUR AUSTRALIAN HISTORY WHICH IS ABSENT OF ROMAN CATHOLIC
IMPOSITIONS UPON OUR BOER / ANZAC TRADITION BY A SUBSTITUTED ETHIC.
Thusly the only dialog about belief in which I have had with the
DISAFFECTED PERSON was related to RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF CONSCIOUSNESS
involving the consoling Catholic mother of a gay son & PFLAG President,
Nanette McGregor - The Rainbow Sash Protest (Refusal of Communion) on
'Pentecost Sunday' 31 May 1998, Saint Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne
pictured by The Australian newspaper (front page) of 1 June 1998:
DOLF: "Is she the mother depicted [by] the statue."
ARTIST: "No it depicts. The statue depicts all mothers [of which our
Lady is the exemplar]."
DOLF: "Yes. Yeah. The problem is that with the BOER WAR Memorial on the
31 May ..."
ARTIST: "Yes"
#473 - *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* as [#400, #8, #60, #5] = châçâh (H2620):
{UMBRA: #17 as #73 % #41 = #32} 1) (Qal) to seek refuge, flee for
protection; 1a) *TO* *PUT* *TRUST* *IN* (*GOD*), *CONFIDE* *OR* *HOPE*
*IN* (*GOD*) (*fig*.);
DOLF: "... I hugged a mother [at] refusal of Communion at Saint
Patrick's Cathedral in Melbourne on 31 May 1998."
ARTIST: "Really."
DOLF: "And she was refused communion because she was wearing a rainbow
sash."
ARTIST: "Oh really."
#473 - *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* as [#30, #5, #3, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200]
= légō (G3004): {UMBRA: #45 as #838 % #41 = #18} 1) to say, to speak;
1a) affirm over, maintain; 1b) to teach; 1c) *TO* *EXHORT*, *ADVISE*,
*TO* *COMMAND*, *DIRECT*; 1d) to point out with words, intend, mean,
mean to say; 1e) to call by name, to call, name; 1f) to speak out, speak
of, mention
DOLF: "For no other reason. So I have an objection for it. Now would
you do me a favour to appease, to balance the karma of things. Because..."
ARTIST: "Yes (inaudible) ..."

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOERWARS19980531.jpg>
#473 - *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* as [#20, #1, #300, #5, #20, #100, #10, #9, #8]
= katakrínō (G2632): {UMBRA: #43 as #1302 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *GIVE*
*JUDGMENT* *AGAINST*, *TO* *JUDGE* *WORTHY* *OF* *PUNISHMENT*; 1a) to
condemn; 1b) by one's good example to render another's wickedness the
more evident and censurable
DOLF: "... I'm going to take the council to court over this particular
matter. Because there is no object of respect at the BOER WAR Memorial."
ARTIST: "So what are you doing taking this to court?"
DOLF: "I'm taking this and the BOER yeah ... this is part of that. This
is part of ANZAC defamation which I have been subject to.
When a mother weeps for her children..."
ARTIST: "But this is what this is."
"With proud thanksgiving, a *MOTHER* *FOR* *HER* *CHILDREN*,
*ENGLAND* *MOURNS* *FOR* *HER* *DEAD* across the sea.
Flesh of her flesh they were, spirit of her spirit,
Fallen in the cause of the free." [Verse 1, Lines 1–4, Ode to the Fallen]
DOLF: "Yeah that is exactly what our 'LEST WE FORGET' poem is all about."
ARTIST: "So why are you against this?"
This then conflicts with the integrity and verity of my own CHERISHED
#175 - MOTHER WITH GAY CHILD political activism (SEE: APPENDIX - ONTIC
DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES) as determined
pre-millennium protest made in support of women's constitutional right
to the exercise of #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL by making a reasoned as
calculated consideration of wilful action involving "WALKING NAKED INTO
THE STREET SO AS TO BE ARRESTED WITH THE ONLY VERBALISATION THEN BEING:
'NAKED I CAME INTO THE WORLD NAKED I WILL GO OUT'"
which occurred on SATURDAY 21 AUGUST 1999.
The term no greater love is derived from a well-known verse of the New
Testament (John 15): "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay
down his life for his friends" (John 15:13), often invoked in the
context of self-sacrifice.
On the basis of substantiated and corroborated facts to the contrary
there is no basis excepting self deluded falsehoods for the disaffected
person to make the claim:
11) THE APPLICANT IS TERRIFIED OF THE RESPONDENT, AND TERRIFIED THAT
THIS BEHAVIOUR WILL CONTINUE DUE TO THE PREVIOUS BEHAVIOUR PERPETRATED
BY THE RESPONDENT.
And should the orders be granted so to place a caveat upon my egress /
ingress to my private property as evinced by CASE NUMBER M11048888 by
reinforcement of VIOLENT past property damages and assailment against my
person which were contemporaneous to the ANZAC 2018 CENTENNIAL for which
we are presently undergoing doctor advised treatment for ANXIETY.
Given there was not any PLANNING PERMIT for the installation of the #175
- MARION / MAGDALENE WOMAN WITH NAKED CHILD statue being a consideration
of due process, our reasonable recourse to such unconscionable conduct
ought as this APPLICATION FOR AN INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER
will be to pursue a legal claim against WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL for
BOER WAR / WORLD WAR ONE as ritual contrariety as memorial infidelity
and seditious libel.
Yours truthfully
----------
APPENDIX - ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
This is an excerpt from the document titled "METHODOLOGICAL
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078 which we understand with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
The answer to this conundrum: “He broke so many [rules] when he drove
(a thing); 3) MASTERING, CONTROLLING, CURBING, RESTRAINING; 3a)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
CONCEPTION OF #NUMBER MENTIONS THE JEWISH SECT DURING BABYLON EXILE
REFERENCING THE STAR OF DAVID BY THE TERM "HEALTH" CONFORMS TO THE GREEK
EXAMPLES WHERE THERAPEÚEIN IS UNDERSTOOD IN THE SPECIALIZED SENSE OF
HEALING: ‘RITUALLY CARE FOR, TAKE CARE OF’ WITH REFERENCE TO WHATEVER IS
CONSIDERED TO BE SACRED
This sacred Jewish emblem is acknowledged within Pythagoras's DECADE as
having a symbolic association to the HEXAD (#6) as "HEALTH: A TRIPLE
TRIANGLE WHICH BEING ALTERNATIVELY CONJOINED WITHIN ITSELF ✡️
CONSTITUTES A FIGURE OF FIVE LINES; THEY USE IT AS A SYMBOL TO THOSE OF
THEIR OWN SECT AND CALLED IT HEALTH" as having an equivalent reliance
upon a faux-wisdom conveying a dependancy on PYTHAGORAS HETEROS THEORY
OF NUMBER

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>
Furthermore, the judicative power in things are Four: *MIND*, *SCIENCE*,
*OPINION*, and *SENSE*; for all beings are dijudicated either by *MIND*,
or *SCIENCE*, or *OPINION*, or *SENSE*: for which reason PYTHAGORAS
AFFIRMED, THE SOUL OF MAN TO CONSIST OF A TETRAD. Finally, the TETRAD
connects all beings, of Elements (ie. FIRE-AIR-WATER-EARTH), *NUMBERS*,
*SEASONS* *OF* *THE* *YEAR*, *CIVIL* *SOCIETY*; neither can we name any
thing, which depends not on the Tetractys, as its *ROOT* and
*PRINCIPLE*; for it is, as we said, the make and cause of all things;
intelligible God, Author of Celestial and sensible Good. The knowledge
of these was delivered to the Pythagoreans by Pythagoras himself.
[Pythagoras His Life and Teachings, 1687 edition of the History of
Philosophy, p 527]
“...THE SON OF MAN SHALL BE BETRAYED UNTO THE CHIEF PRIESTS AND UNTO THE
SCRIBES, AND THEY SHALL CONDEMN HIM TO DEATH, AND SHALL
DELIVER-PARADIDOMI HIM TO THE GENTILES TO MOCK-EMPAÍZŌ: G1702 (@157):
(compare: #940 as [#400, #70, #400, #70] = TAʻTUAʻ: H8595 (@130)), AND
TO SCOURGE, AND TO CRUCIFY HIM...” [Matthew 20:18]
#746 as [#5, #60, #70, #400, #200, #10, #1] = exousía (G1849): {UMBRA:
#746 % #41 = #8} 1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases;
1a) leave or permission; 2) physical and mental power; 2a) the ability
or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or
exercises; 3) the power of authority (influence) and of right
(privilege); 4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose
will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed); 4a)
universally; 4a1) authority over mankind; 4b) specifically; 4b1) the
power of judicial decisions; 4b2) of authority to manage domestic
affairs; 4c) metonymically; 4c1) a thing subject to authority or rule;
i) jurisdiction; 4c2) one who possesses authority; i) a ruler, a human
magistrate; ii) the leading and more powerful among created beings
superior to man, spiritual potentates; 4c3) A SIGN OF THE HUSBAND'S
AUTHORITY OVER HIS WIFE; i) THE VEIL WITH WHICH PROPRIETY REQUIRED A
WOMEN TO COVER HERSELF; 4c4) the sign of regal authority, a crown;
(#125)} <-- SECTION III
#5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
LEXICON ENTRIES
Initial Post: 19 October 2021
SAFETY ORDER AS CASE NUMBER L10182359 LISTED FOR A CONTESTED HEARING ON
11 NOVEMBER 2021 BY ALLEGED BREACHES AS CASE NUMBER M11048888.
Your Honour, this matter as originating CASE NUMBER: L10182359 has now
been before the COURTS for 18 months, as grounds for the interim
intervention order dated 20 FEBRUARY 2020 which in our prudent view are
predicated upon fabrications, misrepresentation and false assertions
against corroborated facts to the contrary.
Our considerations as COURT FILING dated 6 SEPTEMBER 2021 conveys the
claim that the PAIRED and PROXIMITY ACTIONS:
• Saint Patrick's Day #175 - MARION / MAGDALENE WOMAN WITH NAKED CHILD
statue unveiling;
• Oak Tree Planting on 27 OCTOBER 1934 (ie. same year the Sydney /
Melbourne War Memorials were opened) by the Duke of Gloucester;
• #48 - RITUAL (LI) x #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) associated with BOER WAR
#288 - memorial commemorations
Were made in support of IRISH REPUBLICAN ACTIVISM then attempting to
hijack the WORLD WAR ONE CENTENNIAL which is sustained by a #449 -
CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING as evidence (TETRAD #70 - SEVERANCE by #71 -
DOMINION matrix pairing) of intellectual property theft and an intention
to besiege my person, reputation and property.
The grounds for seeking ORDERS with either a confabulation of dates then
entirely misrepresents this reality or completely omits any reference to
the respectful and robust conversation which is evinced by my usage of
the term ma'am some five times and the disaffected person responding on
three occasions by usage of the term "DARLING" as an endearment.
The audio recording was necessary to avoid any incriminations or
recriminations as libellous claims to being THREATENING in any manner
whatsoever as unconscionable and irrational conduct falsely claimed by
the disaffected person:
SUBSEQUENT #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD STATUE DIALOG WITH ARTIST @ 1747
HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018
DOLF: "Just one more question if I may?
Did you get a planning permit for it?"
ARTIST: "Sorry my darling."
DOLF: "Did you get a planning permit for it?"
ARTIST: "Yes."
DOLF: "You did?"
ARTIST: "Yeah."
DOLF: "We were not notified about it."
ARTIST: "I'm sorry darling I don't know what you are on about because
I'm getting very scared."
DOLF: "Why should you be scared?"
ARTIST: "I'm scared of you..."
DOLF: "Why should you be ... I'm just asking you..."
ARTIST: "I'm just scared of you and I see you have been THREATENING."
DOLF: "I'm not being THREATENING at all ma'am."
ARTIST: "You are being THREATENING."
DOLF: "I'm not being THREATENING. I've got it on video tape so I don't
need to be THREATENING."
ARTIST: "Well you have just THREATENED me and I'm going to ring the police."
DOLF: "No I didn't thank-you."
Whereupon, when the falsehood of their having obtained a PLANNING PERMIT
was manifestly apparent, that they made their deceitfully false claims
of THREATENING conduct or having their SAFETY INFRINGED, as
contradiction it was conveyed to them that the conversation had been
recorded.
At no time were persons who might be adversely affected (ie. WE HAVE
FAMILY WAR HISTORY OF MARITAL INFIDELITY RESULTING IN AN ILLEGITIMATE
CHILD AND SUBSEQUENT SUICIDE OF OUR FATHER etc) by the installation of
the #175 - MARION / MAGDALENE WOMAN WITH NAKED CHILD STATUTE granted an
opportunity to have their reasonable objections or recommendations
('perhaps the school grounds with an existing memorial might be a better
situational premise') heard as then by means of a PLANNING PERMIT being
consideration of due process.
The claims of the disaffected person that I have repeated[ly] "ABUS[ED]
THE AFFECTED PERSON REGARDING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH" is a contemptuous
slander given the CHRISTMAS DAY remark was only a statement as to
reasonable cause for our 31 JULY 2017 lodgement against the NEIGHBOUR of
an APPLICATION FOR AN INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER AT THE SALE
MAGISTRATES COURT as CASE NUMBER H12143475 on the following immanent and
substantive grounds:
#3: ON 31.7.2017 AT 10AM [THE RESPONDENT] SHOWED ME A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE
MARION STATUE WITH[IN] THE PARK OPPOSITE WEARING A BALACLAVA AS TO
CONVEY OUR MUTUAL UNDERSTAND[ING] OF IT['S] PLACEMENT AS AN ATTEMPT [TO]
SUBVERT OUR AUSTRALIAN HISTORY WHICH IS ABSENT OF ROMAN CATHOLIC
IMPOSITIONS UPON OUR BOER / ANZAC TRADITION BY A SUBSTITUTED ETHIC.
Thusly the only dialog about belief in which I have had with the
DISAFFECTED PERSON was related to RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF CONSCIOUSNESS
involving the consoling Catholic mother of a gay son & PFLAG President,
Nanette McGregor - The Rainbow Sash Protest (Refusal of Communion) on
'Pentecost Sunday' 31 May 1998, Saint Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne
pictured by The Australian newspaper (front page) of 1 June 1998:
DOLF: "Is she the mother depicted [by] the statue."
ARTIST: "No it depicts. The statue depicts all mothers [of which our
Lady is the exemplar]."
DOLF: "Yes. Yeah. The problem is that with the BOER WAR Memorial on the
31 May ..."
ARTIST: "Yes"
#473 - *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* as [#400, #8, #60, #5] = châçâh (H2620):
{UMBRA: #17 as #73 % #41 = #32} 1) (Qal) to seek refuge, flee for
protection; 1a) *TO* *PUT* *TRUST* *IN* (*GOD*), *CONFIDE* *OR* *HOPE*
*IN* (*GOD*) (*fig*.);
DOLF: "... I hugged a mother [at] refusal of Communion at Saint
Patrick's Cathedral in Melbourne on 31 May 1998."
ARTIST: "Really."
DOLF: "And she was refused communion because she was wearing a rainbow
sash."
ARTIST: "Oh really."
#473 - *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* as [#30, #5, #3, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200]
= légō (G3004): {UMBRA: #45 as #838 % #41 = #18} 1) to say, to speak;
1a) affirm over, maintain; 1b) to teach; 1c) *TO* *EXHORT*, *ADVISE*,
*TO* *COMMAND*, *DIRECT*; 1d) to point out with words, intend, mean,
mean to say; 1e) to call by name, to call, name; 1f) to speak out, speak
of, mention
DOLF: "For no other reason. So I have an objection for it. Now would
you do me a favour to appease, to balance the karma of things. Because..."
ARTIST: "Yes (inaudible) ..."

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOERWARS19980531.jpg>
#473 - *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* as [#20, #1, #300, #5, #20, #100, #10, #9, #8]
= katakrínō (G2632): {UMBRA: #43 as #1302 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *GIVE*
*JUDGMENT* *AGAINST*, *TO* *JUDGE* *WORTHY* *OF* *PUNISHMENT*; 1a) to
condemn; 1b) by one's good example to render another's wickedness the
more evident and censurable
DOLF: "... I'm going to take the council to court over this particular
matter. Because there is no object of respect at the BOER WAR Memorial."
ARTIST: "So what are you doing taking this to court?"
DOLF: "I'm taking this and the BOER yeah ... this is part of that. This
is part of ANZAC defamation which I have been subject to.
When a mother weeps for her children..."
ARTIST: "But this is what this is."
"With proud thanksgiving, a *MOTHER* *FOR* *HER* *CHILDREN*,
*ENGLAND* *MOURNS* *FOR* *HER* *DEAD* across the sea.
Flesh of her flesh they were, spirit of her spirit,
Fallen in the cause of the free." [Verse 1, Lines 1–4, Ode to the Fallen]
DOLF: "Yeah that is exactly what our 'LEST WE FORGET' poem is all about."
ARTIST: "So why are you against this?"
This then conflicts with the integrity and verity of my own CHERISHED
#175 - MOTHER WITH GAY CHILD political activism (SEE: APPENDIX - ONTIC
DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES) as determined
pre-millennium protest made in support of women's constitutional right
to the exercise of #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL by making a reasoned as
calculated consideration of wilful action involving "WALKING NAKED INTO
THE STREET SO AS TO BE ARRESTED WITH THE ONLY VERBALISATION THEN BEING:
'NAKED I CAME INTO THE WORLD NAKED I WILL GO OUT'"
which occurred on SATURDAY 21 AUGUST 1999.
The term no greater love is derived from a well-known verse of the New
Testament (John 15): "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay
down his life for his friends" (John 15:13), often invoked in the
context of self-sacrifice.
On the basis of substantiated and corroborated facts to the contrary
there is no basis excepting self deluded falsehoods for the disaffected
person to make the claim:
11) THE APPLICANT IS TERRIFIED OF THE RESPONDENT, AND TERRIFIED THAT
THIS BEHAVIOUR WILL CONTINUE DUE TO THE PREVIOUS BEHAVIOUR PERPETRATED
BY THE RESPONDENT.
And should the orders be granted so to place a caveat upon my egress /
ingress to my private property as evinced by CASE NUMBER M11048888 by
reinforcement of VIOLENT past property damages and assailment against my
person which were contemporaneous to the ANZAC 2018 CENTENNIAL for which
we are presently undergoing doctor advised treatment for ANXIETY.
Given there was not any PLANNING PERMIT for the installation of the #175
- MARION / MAGDALENE WOMAN WITH NAKED CHILD statue being a consideration
of due process, our reasonable recourse to such unconscionable conduct
ought as this APPLICATION FOR AN INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER
will be to pursue a legal claim against WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL for
BOER WAR / WORLD WAR ONE as ritual contrariety as memorial infidelity
and seditious libel.
Yours truthfully
----------
APPENDIX - ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
This is an excerpt from the document titled "METHODOLOGICAL
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078 which we understand with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
CONSIDERING COLIN POWELL’S IRAQ WAR JUSTIFICATION IN LIGHT OF A
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
The statement is relevant to defeatist notion of Colin Powell's (April
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.

<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/23/opinion/colin-powell-legacy.html>
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.

The answer to this conundrum: “He broke so many [rules] when he drove
controlling one's self, temperate, continent;
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
its existential problem related to the foundations of Western Philosophy.
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA / ORIGIN OF A CAUSE)
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
“…THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER-EXOUSÍA [AT ALL] AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN-DIDOMI THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE THAT
DELIVERED-PARADIDOMI ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.” [John 19:11]
PYTHAGORAS' COMMENTARY ON THE METALOGIC (AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER) BINOMIAL
WERE GIVEN-DIDOMI THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE THAT
DELIVERED-PARADIDOMI ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.” [John 19:11]
CONCEPTION OF #NUMBER MENTIONS THE JEWISH SECT DURING BABYLON EXILE
REFERENCING THE STAR OF DAVID BY THE TERM "HEALTH" CONFORMS TO THE GREEK
EXAMPLES WHERE THERAPEÚEIN IS UNDERSTOOD IN THE SPECIALIZED SENSE OF
HEALING: ‘RITUALLY CARE FOR, TAKE CARE OF’ WITH REFERENCE TO WHATEVER IS
CONSIDERED TO BE SACRED
This sacred Jewish emblem is acknowledged within Pythagoras's DECADE as
having a symbolic association to the HEXAD (#6) as "HEALTH: A TRIPLE
TRIANGLE WHICH BEING ALTERNATIVELY CONJOINED WITHIN ITSELF ✡️
CONSTITUTES A FIGURE OF FIVE LINES; THEY USE IT AS A SYMBOL TO THOSE OF
THEIR OWN SECT AND CALLED IT HEALTH" as having an equivalent reliance
upon a faux-wisdom conveying a dependancy on PYTHAGORAS HETEROS THEORY
OF NUMBER

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>
Furthermore, the judicative power in things are Four: *MIND*, *SCIENCE*,
*OPINION*, and *SENSE*; for all beings are dijudicated either by *MIND*,
or *SCIENCE*, or *OPINION*, or *SENSE*: for which reason PYTHAGORAS
AFFIRMED, THE SOUL OF MAN TO CONSIST OF A TETRAD. Finally, the TETRAD
connects all beings, of Elements (ie. FIRE-AIR-WATER-EARTH), *NUMBERS*,
*SEASONS* *OF* *THE* *YEAR*, *CIVIL* *SOCIETY*; neither can we name any
thing, which depends not on the Tetractys, as its *ROOT* and
*PRINCIPLE*; for it is, as we said, the make and cause of all things;
intelligible God, Author of Celestial and sensible Good. The knowledge
of these was delivered to the Pythagoreans by Pythagoras himself.
[Pythagoras His Life and Teachings, 1687 edition of the History of
Philosophy, p 527]
“...THE SON OF MAN SHALL BE BETRAYED UNTO THE CHIEF PRIESTS AND UNTO THE
SCRIBES, AND THEY SHALL CONDEMN HIM TO DEATH, AND SHALL
DELIVER-PARADIDOMI HIM TO THE GENTILES TO MOCK-EMPAÍZŌ: G1702 (@157):
(compare: #940 as [#400, #70, #400, #70] = TAʻTUAʻ: H8595 (@130)), AND
TO SCOURGE, AND TO CRUCIFY HIM...” [Matthew 20:18]
#746 as [#5, #60, #70, #400, #200, #10, #1] = exousía (G1849): {UMBRA:
#746 % #41 = #8} 1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases;
1a) leave or permission; 2) physical and mental power; 2a) the ability
or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or
exercises; 3) the power of authority (influence) and of right
(privilege); 4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose
will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed); 4a)
universally; 4a1) authority over mankind; 4b) specifically; 4b1) the
power of judicial decisions; 4b2) of authority to manage domestic
affairs; 4c) metonymically; 4c1) a thing subject to authority or rule;
i) jurisdiction; 4c2) one who possesses authority; i) a ruler, a human
magistrate; ii) the leading and more powerful among created beings
superior to man, spiritual potentates; 4c3) A SIGN OF THE HUSBAND'S
AUTHORITY OVER HIS WIFE; i) THE VEIL WITH WHICH PROPRIETY REQUIRED A
WOMEN TO COVER HERSELF; 4c4) the sign of regal authority, a crown;
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
@200, {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
(#125)} <-- SECTION III
@186, {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
@84, {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746 - exousía (G1849)); Ego: 3
- MIRED: HSIEN (#219)} <-- SECTION VII
SECTION VII - And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said Governor
General out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our Lieutenant Governor of Our
said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such Lieutenant Governor in
Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the
Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such
Lieutenant Governor, or such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY
SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE OATHS APPOINTED to be taken by the Governor General
of Our said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
- MIRED: HSIEN (#219)} <-- SECTION VII
SECTION VII - And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said Governor
General out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our Lieutenant Governor of Our
said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such Lieutenant Governor in
Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the
Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such
Lieutenant Governor, or such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY
SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE OATHS APPOINTED to be taken by the Governor General
of Our said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
#4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
@86, {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224)} <-- SECTION VIII
@177, {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA
(#239)} <-- SECTION IX
#5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
LEXICON ENTRIES
@140] {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940: asphalḗs (G804):
certain, true; suited to confirm / emménō (G1696): to persevere in
anything, a state of mind); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298)} <-- SECTION X
SECTION X - AND WE DO FURTHER DIRECT AND ENJOIN THAT THESE OUR LETTERS
PATENT SHALL BE READ AND PROCLAIMED AT SUCH PLACE OR PLACES AS OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL *SHALL* *THINK* *FIT* WITHIN OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA.
certain, true; suited to confirm / emménō (G1696): to persevere in
anything, a state of mind); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298)} <-- SECTION X
SECTION X - AND WE DO FURTHER DIRECT AND ENJOIN THAT THESE OUR LETTERS
PATENT SHALL BE READ AND PROCLAIMED AT SUCH PLACE OR PLACES AS OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL *SHALL* *THINK* *FIT* WITHIN OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA.
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Powell.pdf>
Initial Post: 19 October 2021
dolf
Nov 7, 2021, 10:47:40 PM11/7/21
to
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
This is an excerpt from the document titled "METHODOLOGICAL
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078 which we understand with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING MORPHOGENIC KNOTS" as
revision dated 19 OCTOBER 2021 [being] our subsequent discourse will be
on Cortese's use of the word téchnē-G5078 which we understand with
respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA (Godhead) as being an attribute of
anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]).
CONSIDERING COLIN POWELL’S IRAQ WAR JUSTIFICATION IN LIGHT OF A
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
SEMANTICAL PRISM: EXISTENTIALISM, NIHILISM AND ABSURDISM
The statement is relevant to defeatist notion of Colin Powell's (April
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/23/opinion/colin-powell-legacy.html>
5, 1937 – October 18, 2021) “role in backing the Iraq war.” He was an
American statesman, diplomat, and four-star general who served as the
65th United States secretary of state from 2001 to 2005. He was the
first African-American secretary of state. He served as the 16th United
States national security advisor from 1987 to 1989 and as the 12th
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1989 to 1993.
The answer to this conundrum: “He broke so many [rules] when he drove
controlling one's self, temperate, continent;
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
Thusly the consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined
as to whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where—to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature—the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHNĒ: G5078) seeks to
place a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a
juxtaposition control.
The logical argument is existential but nonetheless recognises that the
achilles heal to the binomial stasis of coercive control occurs within
the 21st year as principle of liability related to autonomy.
To argue that a 20 year war could be necessary to be able to obtain
advantage would be readily regarded as an absurdity in much the same way
that a “shock and awe” approach is needlessly nihilistic.
I must also speak to this defeatist notion of his “role in backing the
Iraq war” and our role as part of the coalition of military response.
Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC) visited Babylon (ie Iraq) during Jewish
captivity and articulated the binomial (@1, @5) stasis to number from
whence the Roman notion of State is derived.
We here show that such meta prototypes have a trinomial capability and
illustrate their deployment to frame the constitution as thusly convey
its existential problem related to the foundations of Western Philosophy.
"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]
ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES
#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA / ORIGIN OF A CAUSE)
#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* *IDENTITY* OF FRENCH REPUBLIC AS CITIZEN / AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
@200, {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG
COMMONWEALTH NOTIONS OF ANZAC IDENTITY
@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 -
TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
@86, {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87)}
(#125)} <-- SECTION III
@186, {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
@191, {@17: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS:
TUAN (#178)}
@200, {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
@84, {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746 - exousía (G1849)); Ego: 3
- MIRED: HSIEN (#219)} <-- SECTION VII
SECTION VII - And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said Governor
General out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our Lieutenant Governor of Our
said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such Lieutenant Governor in
Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the
Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such
Lieutenant Governor, or such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY
SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE OATHS APPOINTED to be taken by the Governor General
of Our said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
- MIRED: HSIEN (#219)} <-- SECTION VII
SECTION VII - And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said Governor
General out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our Lieutenant Governor of Our
said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such Lieutenant Governor in
Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the
Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such
Lieutenant Governor, or such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY
SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE OATHS APPOINTED to be taken by the Governor General
of Our said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
#4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)
@86, {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224)} <-- SECTION VIII
@177, {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA
(#239)} <-- SECTION IX
#5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
LEXICON ENTRIES
@140] {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940: asphalḗs (G804):
certain, true; suited to confirm / emménō (G1696): to persevere in
anything, a state of mind); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298)} <-- SECTION X
SECTION X - AND WE DO FURTHER DIRECT AND ENJOIN THAT THESE OUR LETTERS
PATENT SHALL BE READ AND PROCLAIMED AT SUCH PLACE OR PLACES AS OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL *SHALL* *THINK* *FIT* WITHIN OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA.
certain, true; suited to confirm / emménō (G1696): to persevere in
anything, a state of mind); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298)} <-- SECTION X
SECTION X - AND WE DO FURTHER DIRECT AND ENJOIN THAT THESE OUR LETTERS
PATENT SHALL BE READ AND PROCLAIMED AT SUCH PLACE OR PLACES AS OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL *SHALL* *THINK* *FIT* WITHIN OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA.
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Powell.pdf>
Initial Post: 19 October 2021
Pier
Nov 8, 2021, 5:20:45 PM11/8/21
to
Il 11/07/2021 10:43, dolf ha scritto:
> -- HEAL COUNTRY {#81 - SOVEREIGN / #65 - SOLDIER / #60 - CENTRE}
> -- HEAL COUNTRY {#81 - SOVEREIGN / #65 - SOLDIER / #60 - CENTRE}
> Whilst aboriginals may interact with nature, they do not have any
> exquisite knowledge occasioning an expansive vocabulary about nature’s
> principle of emanation as causality being the temporal attribute of the
> seven day week is conformity to law of nature nor the manifesting norm
> as covetous gain by the IRISH particularly.
>
>
I do not understand how in this space where one could talk about
> exquisite knowledge occasioning an expansive vocabulary about nature’s
> principle of emanation as causality being the temporal attribute of the
> seven day week is conformity to law of nature nor the manifesting norm
> as covetous gain by the IRISH particularly.
>
>
Islam, which does not admit free will, instead we are uselessly
discussing something else with I don't know what purpose. If in Islam in
which blind and absolute obedience is forced like a corpse, we continue
to consider women as sheep, without culture, little study, minimal
freedom of thought and action. This blocks a lot of things and puts you
1000 years behind and you follow Sura 16,106 on falsehood.
--
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Pier
Nov 8, 2021, 5:22:13 PM11/8/21
to
Il 31/07/2021 04:04, dolf ha scritto:
> .jackNote@zen: 3, row: 4, col: 4, nous: 40 [DATE: 2021.7.30, SUPER: #475
> / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence;
> .jackNote@zen: 3, row: 4, col: 4, nous: 40 [DATE: 2021.7.30, SUPER: #475
> / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence;
>> Whilst aboriginals may interact with nature, they do not have any
>> exquisite knowledge occasioning an expansive vocabulary about nature’s
>> principle of emanation as causality being the temporal attribute of
>> the seven day week is conformity to law of nature nor the manifesting
>> norm as covetous gain by the IRISH particularly.
>>
>> “YE SHAL
>> exquisite knowledge occasioning an expansive vocabulary about nature’s
>> principle of emanation as causality being the temporal attribute of
>> the seven day week is conformity to law of nature nor the manifesting
>> norm as covetous gain by the IRISH particularly.
>>
>> “YE SHAL
Pier
Nov 9, 2021, 1:13:19 AM11/9/21
to
Il 27/08/2021 02:43, dolf ha scritto:
> (c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2021
>
> Before we continue with the implementation of our noetic lexicon
> navigation within the GRUMBLE prototype, we ought to ought to make self
> educated appraisal of a research chapter from the International Journal
> of Technoethics and a scholarly book so as to make an accommodation of
> ideas expressed therein and as syncretism progress my own semantics of
> experience:
>
> (c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2021
>
> Before we continue with the implementation of our noetic lexicon
> navigation within the GRUMBLE prototype, we ought to ought to make self
> educated appraisal of a research chapter from the International Journal
> of Technoethics and a scholarly book so as to make an accommodation of
> ideas expressed therein and as syncretism progress my own semantics of
> experience:
>
0 new messages