info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
-- DRAFT #2A: FATWA THE FAT MAMA SINGS OUR LEGAL CASE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT OUGHT TO BE HEARD BEFORE YOURS SENATOR LAMBIE
0 views
Skip to first unread message
dolf
Jun 23, 2023, 7:49:42 PM6/23/23
to
EMAIL TO SENATOR JACQUI LAMBIE @ 1417 HRS ON 23 JUNE 2023: "UPDATE ON
OUR LEGAL CASE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT OUGHT TO BE HEARD
BEFORE YOURS SENATOR LAMBIE:
I just thought to share with you, only three documents as IBAC briefing
NOTES relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
RENEWED IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018 CENTENNIAL by their
ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM against the COMMONWEALTH as the product
of a CEASAROPAPISM and deference given to PAPAL AUTHORITY. You would
probably be aware that BEN ROBERTS-SMITH was on 6 APRIL 2010 pictured
wearing KNIGHTS TEMPLAR CROSS, but it is unknown to me whether this was
jewellery or an affiliation with their later RENEWAL ON 2ND EASTER OF 11
APRIL 2015 as a calendar correspondence to the crucifixion of 3 APRIL 33 AD.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230613.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230620.pdf>
Herewith are details of the RUSSIANS similarly using a RELIGIOUS GAMBIT
(ie. the construction of the MAIN CATHEDRAL OF THE RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES:
CATHEDRAL OF THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) as some considerations on
natural disconcertions [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI),
#40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] by the RUSSIANs (REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM IDEA @328)
HAVING A VALID CONCERN (ie. the #33 - PHONEMES induces a pathological
characteristic within the TABLE TALK which includes JEWS, CHRISTIANS and
COMMUNISTS in the same class as exclusion group) ABOUT NAZI IDENTITY
(ie. "rewrite history and glorify fascists" [Wikileaks document ID:
08MOSCOW2656_a, dated 1 FEBRUARY 2008]) which is BELLIGERENTLY an
unresolved question of 90 years duration and could [as prima facie]
subject NATO to reparations within the UKRAINIAN proxy war.
As an ex-member of the police service I understand that #237 - USE OF
FORCE is a conceptual form presently deployed by our state police whose
motto is TENEZ LE DROIT / UPHOLD THE RIGHT that is also an ontic / deme
boundary and a general principle of #491 - AGENCY (ie. no less
applicable to healthcare) capacity in conformity to [... #40 - LAW /
MODEL (FE)] as then a functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST which is
distinct to the #111 - FALLACIOUS OR VACUOUS assertion that attaining
#71 - *DOMINION* [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)] is
judgement sensibility's ultimate end as it's centre of value.
[SEE UPDATED STATEMENT BELOW]
If you know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a product (ie. by letters
patent from the hand of QUEEN VICTORIA as EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE
FAITH) of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as
differentiated worldviews, then you might not comprehend the underly
HYPOSTASIS issues which can mitigate any culpability for alleged WAR CRIMES.
Firstly the machinery (#65 - SOLDIER / #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD) of STATE
as BIPARTITE worldview can lead to NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER
which may result in a disregard of other persons such as prisoners.
Secondly the BIPARTITE worldview can predispose one to adverse
behavioural reinforcement (eg: 20 year theatre of war with an ABSENCE OF
ANY VIABLE OBJECTIVE since they know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a
product of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as different
worldviews) as high acumen -/+ of DOMINION #n anchors resulting in
patterns [# ... # ... #] of behaviour responses which may not accord
with the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action as evidence of
prudent rather than instinctive action.
Lastly it is not known if there has been any investigation as to whether
such misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH
massacre was given imprimatur by the RSL members associated with KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN SOLDIERS as
potential associates) occurred in the advancement of the SEDITIOUS CAUSE
relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED
IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018 CENTENNIAL by their ATLANTIS 25
APRIL 1915 PHANTASM.
I'm just a retired private citizen, who watches TV and engages within
informal research into metaphysical and metempirical philosophy with the
objective of technologizing QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as a single
avenue of enquiry pursued now for some 27 years duration.
IF I MIGHT JUST CONTINUE ON THREE THOUGHTS:
Should the misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH
massacre was given imprimatur by the RSL members associated with KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN SOLDIERS as
potential associates) have occurred due to PROFESSIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
with AMERICAN SOLDIERS then IN AND OF ITSELF may be an undue adverse
influence since their REPUBLIC is not a product of any CAESAROPAPISM but
an iconoclastic consequence against such (ie. "We hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.") as notions which merely
intersect the ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (as then EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE FAITH).
Secondly the notion of ICONOCLASM against the TRIPARTITE WORLDVIEW of
VOLUNTARY FREEWILL when it is subject to a PREDISPOSITION through
ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie. war) from a
BIPARTITE worldview such as ISLAM which has its own ANTHROPOLOGICAL
CONSTRUCT of SUBJECT WILL as claim to piety.
As a #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION upon ICONOCLASM raised against the
BIPARTITE v's TRIPARTITE usage against this same #71 - DOMINION array
construct, we've expanded the hypothetical consideration applicable to
GEORGE FLOYD's "I can't breath" death by continual exertion of force in
total dominion as an extremely high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors which
may be the result of adverse behavioural reinforcement as belligerence
(ie. not necessarily reciprocated) that spirals to its ultimate end as
iconoclasm (ie.
Byzantine Greek εἰκονοκλάστης [TELOS: #984 (BY ISOPSEPHY) dolióō
(G1387): *DECEIT*, eidōleîon (G1493): *TEMPLE* *OF* *IDOLS*, echthrós
(G2190): *HOSTILE*; *OPPOSING* *GOD* *IN* *THE* *MIND*; *DEMONIC* *AS*
*BITTER* *ENEMY* *OF* *THE* *DIVINE* *GOVERNMENT*, syníēmi (G4920):
*COMBATANTS*, MALE: #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION, FEME: #417 - CAUSE OR
REASON, DEME: #155 - JUDGE OR UMPIRE] as etymology from εἰκών (eikṓn,
“figure, icon, pattern, archetype”) + κλάω (kláō, “to break, weaken,
frustrate”) + -της (-tēs, agent suffix representing a state of being)
) against the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which is constitutionally
intrinsic to the ontology of the human being (ie. homosapiens)
reflecting IMAGO DEI.
#885 as [#5, #10, #20, #800, #50] = eikṓn (G1504): {UMBRA: #885 % #41 =
#24} 1) an image, figure, likeness; 1a) *AN* *IMAGE* *OF* *THE* *THINGS*
(*THE* *HEAVENLY* *THINGS*); 1a1) used of the moral likeness of renewed
men to God; 1a2) the image of the Son of God, into which true Christians
are transformed, is likeness not only to the heavenly body, but also to
the most holy and blessed state of mind, which Christ possesses; 1b) the
image of one; 1b1) one in whom the likeness of any one is seen; 1b2)
*APPLIED* *TO* *MAN* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *HIS* *POWER* *OF* *COMMAND*;
1b3) to Christ on account of his divine nature and absolute moral
excellence;
#257 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #20, #30, #1,
#200, #1] /
#851 as [#20, #30, #1, #800] = kláō (G2806): {UMBRA: #851 % #41 = #31}
1) *TO* *BREAK*; 1a) used in the NT of the *BREAKING* *OF* *BREAD* *OR*
*COMMUNION*;
#676 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #300, #8, #200] = poiētḗs (G4163): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) a maker, a producer, author; 2) a doer, performer;
2a) *ONE* *WHO* *OBEYS* *OR* *FULFILS* *THE* *LAW*; 3) a poet;
I'm not a lawyer and only possess a modicum of knowledge, but I think
that the relevant jurisprudent principle is CASUS DATAE LEGIS to
describe the circumstance of a BIPARTITE iconoclasm against the
TRIPARTITE premise of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY as constitutionally
intrinsic to the ontology of the human being which would then conform to
IMMANUEL KANT'S representation of the unity of consciousness linking
together several other representations, or a representation of their
relation in a single concept (9: 101).In the Critique of Pure Reason he
characterizes judgment as [Pure general logic] deals with concepts,
judgments, and inferences, corresponding exactly to the functions and
order of those powers of the mind, which are comprehended under the
broad designation of understanding in general… If the understanding in
general is explained as the faculty of rules, then the power of judgment
is the faculty of subsuming under rules, i.e., of determining whether
something stands under a given rule (CASUS DATAE LEGIS) or not.
(A130-132/B170-172)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/Win2004/entries/kant-judgment/>
WHILST WE HAVE DESIGNATED THE SEMANTICAL BASIS FOR A RATIONAL FACULTY OF
RULES WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA
TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (then as EMPRESS and
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH). And UNDOUBTEDLY the relevant jurisprudent
principle of CASUS DATAE LEGIS is known [and conjectured upon but not
with any substantial clarity].
"Kant restricts the sense of 'Judgment" to the act of "subsuming under
rules, that is, of distinguishing whether something falls under a given
rule or not (CASUS DATAE LEGIS)" (id. A 132-34, B 171-74). This sense is
borrowed from lawyerly usage, not from logic, for, as Kant shows, logic
has nothing to say regarding this operation. There are, and there can
be, no rules regarding the application of rules. If Kant is right, a
sizable part of what we take to be "law," and almost all jurisprudence,
are nothing but a futile striving to overcome this essential unruliness
of judgment. How can it be that the saying of law is lawless?
Perhaps, however, even to lawyers, the essence of a judgment does not
lie in the application of a rule to a particular case, but rather in the
statement, or restatement, of the rule to be applied (eg: #451 - PRAXIS
OF RATIONALITY OF WHICH THERE IS NO KNOWLEDGE). If law consists of
rules, and if rules themselves are general propositions stating
obligations in general terms, then the properly 'judicial" in a judgment
would bet he stating of rules. The"case"would then matter only as
providing an occasion for such a ruling. If so, 'Judging," juridictio,
would find its most manifest instantiation in what we call
"legislation," legisatio, from legem tollere, the elevation of a lex, or
statute, to its position of authority, which is always at once also the
corresponding degradation of another.
Kant too, perhaps following this unmistakable hint of language, found a
kind of judgment in which the casus itself was manifestly decided,
indeed incontrovertibly, although the rule under which the fallen case
fell was still to be found, and would eventually deny itself entirely to
man's power to say. To this type of judgment, he devoted the most heroic
of his works, which he called a critique of the power of judgment,
Kritik der Urteilskraft. There the will to judge seems to run up against
its outer limits. In what sense indeed is there still a 'Judgment," that
is, a saying of law, when the supposed "law" withdraws into
ineffability?" [Vanderbuilt Law Review, Volume 48, Issue 4 Issue 4 - May
1995]
To that end we've included the broader statement on an identified
CHRISTOLOGICAL AND METASCHEMA OF EVASION WITH PARADIGM EQUIVALENCE TO
FASCIST IDENTITY (ie. the BIPARTITE @1 - SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY DYNAMIC / @5
- STATE AS ITS INVENTION), from which you can conclude that if ISLAM has
a CIRCUMSTANTIAL / SPECULATIVE CHRISTOLOGY THAT HAS NO CRUCIFIXION then
IPSO FACTO it is a METASCHEMA OF EVASION as being deployed which is
detrimental to anything but its ANTHROPOLOGICAL idealism.
#68 #11 #44
#17 #41 #65
#38 #71 #14
The TRIPARTITE use of a temporal heuristic as metakosmeo which has an
implicit conception of autonomy rather than a bipartite
HETEROS-AFFECTION (ie. I utilised this in relation to the #328 -
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE as its therapeutic imperative) stricture such
as the NUMI / NUMEN AUGUSTI [#38, #71, #14] metakinesis inducement as
imposition [#17, #41, #65] made upon autonomy.
On that physiological basis the police member's guilt in the elimination
of GEORGE FLOYD is mitigated. Any implicit adverse institutional [#68,
#11, #44] imperative which is self evident since we stated it before the
findings of those systemic prejudices were made known, ought not be ipso
facto imputed against the police officer's #237 - USE OF FORCE as an
AUTO-AFFECTIVE action.
Again, using the same #71 - DOMINION array construct, it ought to be
possible to resolve the #468: PERPLEXING QUESTION (#17) of prudent #519:
discernment (#68) made in relation to the #495: seminal cause (#44) for
the exercising of #462: dominion (#11) corresponding to #465: limits
(#14) and the viability of #492: freewill (#41).
#123 as [#40, #1, #10, #2, #10, #20, #600] = ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13 %
#41 = #13} 1) (Qal) *ENEMY*; 1a) personal; 1b) national;
#516 (-> #65) - *METAKOSMEO* *ASSOCIATOR* as [#6, #8, #6, #90, #6, #400] /
#519 (-> #68) as [#8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #5] /
#522 (-> #71) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6] = chûwts (H2351):
{UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) *OUTSIDE*, outward, street, the outside;
As the need for an enquiry method to determine viability of the DOMINION
array [] to assay the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action. A
high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors is evidence of prudent rather than
instinctive action.
Whilst my usage of language is not as superlative, I AM (ie. I = #123 -
JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / INTELLECT, AM = #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: @491
- PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY TO @1 - SELF) nevertheless able within a
TRIPARTITE paradigm as grounding for perspective to then accommodate by
syncretic progression DERRIDA's obtuse semantical construct which is a
BIPARTITE encapsulation of being as: "what he is trying to do with
auto-affection: if the auto-position, the automonstrative autotely of
the ‘I,’ even in the human, implies the ‘I’ to be an other that must
welcome within itself some irreducible hetero-affection."
Simply expressed as an ontic premise, if there are reciprocal I = #123 -
judgement sensibility / intellect, then an obligating norm is implied as
conformity to rule-based conventions:
#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rule
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference
object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META
LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - *JUPITER* *PRINCIPLE* as aesthetic (ie.
the hypotenuse thesis) which is made against #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
(#41 + #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY) being a methodology of #491 -
AGENCY that we redacted two policing #237 - USE OF FORCE scenarios (not
included here) as CASE STUDIES to their metaphysical constructs relative
to the DOMINION ARRAY in the context of the COMMONWEALTH being a
CAESAROPAPISM and DEFENDER [#44, #17, #38]@(#123 / #99 -- to deploy the
DOMINION array anchors as a TRIPARTITE intellectual construct against
the ontic substitution premise within the machinery as BIPARTITE
sovereign / autonomy dynamic) OF THE FAITH: DIEU ET MON DROIT conforming
to a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT.
"THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE #415 - *SON* (ie. FOSTERING (yǎng): to
raise; to *BRING* *UP* (*CHILDREN*, animals); to give birth / #81 - 𝍖養
= #532 - shâbar (H7665): *BRING* *TO* *THE* *BIRTH*) OF GOD... AND WENT
AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT [#1521 = praitṓrion (G4232): 'HEAD-QUARTERS' IN
A ROMAN CAMP; MAGNIFICENT PALACE OF HEROD (son of a hero) THE GREAT;
#341 - MAIN CATHEDRAL (TO THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) OF THE RUSSIAN
ARMED FORCES *CONSECRATION* ON 14 JUNE 2020 / #387 - *VICTORY* *DAY*
WHEN CONSTRUCTION OF THE CATHEDRAL WAS COMPLETED ON 9 MAY 2020] HALL ...
#509 - *YAHAD* (JEWISH / CHRISTIANS) / #516 - *METAKOSMEO* ASSOCIATOR =
3 APRIL 33 AD
#232 - *CUNNING* *PLAN* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as
[#20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] /
#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as
[#5, #20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] = krázō (G2896): {UMBRA: #928 % #41 =
#26} 1) to croak; 1a) of the *CRY* *OF* *A* *RAVEN*; 1b) hence, to cry
out, cry aloud, vociferate; 1c) *TO* *CRY* *OR* *PRAY* *FOR*
*VENGEANCE*; 2) to cry; 2a) *CRY* *OUT* *ALOUD*, speak with a loud voice;
BUT THE JEWS *CRIED*-G2896: OUT, SAYING IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU
ART NOT CAESAR'S FRIEND: WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH
AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:7, 12]
It ought to be understood that #237 - USE OF FORCE is a conceptual form
presently deployed by our state police whose motto is TENEZ LE DROIT /
UPHOLD THE RIGHT that is also an ontic / deme boundary and a general
principle of #491 - AGENCY (ie. no less applicable to healthcare)
capacity in conformity to [... #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] as then a
functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST which is distinct to the #111 -
FALLACIOUS OR VACUOUS assertion that attaining #71 - *DOMINION* [#38 -
FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)] is judgement sensibility's
ultimate end as it's centre of value.
#71 as [#1, #30, #10, #30] /
#73 as [#6, #1, #30, #6, #30] /
#81 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #10] /
#111 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #600] /
#123 as [#2, #1, #30, #10, #30, #10, #600] = ʼĕlîyl (H457): {UMBRA: #71
% #41 = #30} 1) of nought, *GOOD* *FOR* *NOTHING*, worthless; 1a) *OF*
*PHYSICIANS*, a shepherd, *A* *DIVINATION*; 1b) of false gods;
Which is also a requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA being a nomenclature
provision of acceptable meta descriptors for articulating the viable
boundary (ie. SUGGESTED BY THE EXPRESSION nán táo fǎ wǎng (難逃法網): [#79 -
𝍔難 = #530 / #49 - 𝌶逃 = #500 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - IT IS HARD TO ESCAPE
THE DRAGNET OF THE LAW; THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW) of consciousness
instantiation, having a correspondence to the cosmological primitives
(ie. LAWS OF NATURE: fǎ dù (法度): [#40 - 𝌭法 = #491 / #52 - 𝌹度 = #503]
- (A) LAW / chéng wén fǎ (成文法): [#73 - 𝍎成 = #524 / #47 - 𝌴文 = #498 /
#40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - STATUTE) published within the CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY (太玄經) TETRADS of 4 BCE.
It is UNLIKELY (in my humble opinion) that you'll find any COMPETENT
JUDGE let alone a PROSECUTOR who could make any determination of WAR
CRIMES in the circumstance of a BIPARTITE ICONOCLASM against the
TRIPARTITE premise of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY.
Such a pity then that you would not be able to prosecute WAR CRIMES on
the basis of either NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER or a
PREDISPOSITION TO ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie.
war) as ICONOCLASM against FREEWILL from a BIPARTITE worldview such as
ISLAM which claims a piety established upon a metaphorical root (eg:
#232 - meteor idol secreted within the KAABA) and a demanded SUBJECT WILL.
However if misconduct occurred in the advancement of the SEDITIOUS CAUSE
relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED
IN 2015 I would prosecute.
Otherwise, I would propose the adoption of a #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277
- RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST methodology as an effective means for assaying
and negation by the introduction of an alternative postulate upon the
thinking dynamic concept of #123 - INTELLECT and its relationship to
#164 - DOMINION as impetus for #205 - STRATEGIC ACTION.
Towards that end I have provided defence media with the ONTIC as
MATHEMATICAL IDEA TEMPLATE to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT which as
ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY and ONTIC VARIANCE provides a CENTRAL means
for FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS of FREEWILL.
Those philosophical contemplations which have taken some considerable
time to formulate into a comprehensive, substantial and persuasive
jurisprudent argument was then the basis as to the nature of a
disclosure recorded within A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST INTO THE
INCIDENT AT THE STAR HOTEL, 173 RAYMOND STREET, SALE @ 1130 TO 1245
HOURS ON SUNDAY 26 MARCH 2017:
"Have dealt with the male customer once prior, where ... [CENSORED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 33(1)] ... On this particular occasion, he
mentioned having been up since 2 AM working on ANTI-TERRORISM documents,
that he was a very important person to the county and had UNUSUAL
SKILLS, etc. All of which he revealed in a quick conversation before
ordering."
Is it not as "ANTI-TERRORISM" action, by an "UNUSUAL SKILL" to exercise
faith in GOD with the intellectual and spontaneous capacity in writing a
POEM constituting a dialectic depth of fifteen lines including
consecutive WORDS OF THE DAY for 8 to 12 DECEMBER 2016;
www.dictionary.com and then weaponise it subsequently, with just a TITLE
CHANGE on 6 MARCH 2022 as [#371, #392, #424, #492] for the occasion of
an important anniversary, as resonance to the RUSSIAN DAY OF REMEMBRANCE
AND SORROW (the day Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1941) on 22 JUNE
2023?
TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “Why did you put this rubbish on our Triple F Cafe
Facebook Page?”
<https://www.facebook.com/Triple-F-Cafe-freshfastfood-225837177482258>
DOLF: "Because that is what occupied my mind (ie. it is a demand of
compliance which was made to 1.6 billion people) when I came into your
cafe this last morning CAROL (manly, strong)...
NOTE: The POEM was initially written as empathetic response to a
PERVERSE JUDGMENT on 9 DECEMBER 2016 by the DUTCH COURTS within CASE
NUMBER: 09/837304-15 against GILDER'S public speech on 19 MARCH 2014:
On 12 MARCH 2014 the Dutch politician GEERT WILDERS and several members
of his party, PVV, also known as The Freedom Party, visited a market in
The Hague. Part of their visit was broadcast on national TV and GEERT
WILDERS said that his party would make the city more safe, more
sociable, and if possible, make it a city with fewer Moroccans. When
later confronted with his statement WILDERS held that he had merely
referred to criminal Moroccans and Moroccans receiving benefits from the
state.
On 19 MARCH 2014 the Freedom Party held an election rally at CAFÉ DE
TIJD in The Hague. During the meeting, GEERT WILDERS held a speech which
was recorded and broadcast on TV. In his speech he stated: “Before I go,
I would like everyone here to answer the following three questions.
Three questions, please give a clear answer which defines our party, the
PVV. Do you want more or less European Union?” The crowd present
repeatedly shouted “less”. WILDERS then went on to pose the second
question: “Do you want more or less Labour Party?” The crowd again
shouted “less”. WILDERS continued: “And the third question is, and
actually I’m not allowed to say it, because you get reported to the
police, and maybe there are even D66 prosecutors who will launch a case,
but freedom of expression is a great good and we haven’t said anything
that isn’t allowed, we haven’t said anything that’s incorrect, so I ask
you: do you want more or fewer Moroccans in this city and in the
Netherlands?”. The crowd repeatedly shouted “less”. GEERT WILDERS then
concluded his speech with the words: “Nah, we’ll arrange it”.
At the election meeting a coordinator (witness 3) from the PVV had been
aware that WILDERS would ask the public whether they wanted fewer
Moroccans. The coordinator had been asked (by witness 4) to instruct the
public in advance of the question and answer. Before the speech witness
4 had heard GEERT WILDERS emphasize that it should be as strong as
possible so the content would be picked up by the press and broadcast.
The legal implications of the speech had not been discussed. The issue
of including the topic of Moroccans or criminal Moroccans was discussed
and there was some concern whether there would be a prompt response from
the public. This was the reason why witness 4 called witness 3 and asked
him to ensure that a proper interaction would take place.
Among the many Dutch politicians who have had a FATWA [Arabic: فتوى,
TELOS: #487 - RITUAL ADMINISTRATION (#36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG); MALE:
#237 - USE OF FORCE; FEME: #163 - ANGRY, RAGING, VEXED; ONTIC: #156 -
LIVING SUBSTANCE; DEME: #548 - COMMANDMENT] issued against them,
possibly the best-known internationally is GEERT WILDERS. In 2008
WILDERS received 285 death threats, with a further 264 aimed at all
Dutch politicians. There were a total of 145 protection orders for
WILDERS in 2006; in 2005 there were 110.

<https://gatesofvienna.net/2010/09/australian-fatwa-behead-wilders/>
An Australian imam named FEIZ MUHAMMAD who as head of the Global Islamic
Youth Centre in Liverpool, a suburb of Sydney is viewed by intelligence
agencies worldwide as one of the main jihadist ideologues, a great
inspiration for young Western Muslim radicals had issued a FATWA calling
for the Dutch politician’s beheading.
According to Dutch newspaper Elsevier on 3 SEPTEMBER 2010: "PVV leader
GEERT WILDERS [was] angry at the Dutch Intelligence Service [AIVD]. The
AIVD is in the possession of a sound recording on which WILDERS is
threatened with death by the imam on a secluded site of jihadists, in
response to questions by Dutch radicals says:
“We see the evil filth of people such as that filthy Dutch politician.
Anyone who mocks our learning, laughs at the Islam and degrades it must
enter death, decapitate him, cut off his head.”.
The PVV leader was only informed in detail about the matter around 2
SEPTEMBER 2010. Accordingly WILDERS says he is shocked, and last night
consulted ERIC AKERBOOM, National Coordinator for Counterterrorism
(NCTb). “I urgently want to know why the NCTb and AIVD never informed me
about this.”
He also asked “what kind of consequences this has for me,” and called
the recording “terrible”."
<http://www.elsevier.nl/web/Nieuws/Nederland/274863/Radicale-imam-adviseert-Geert-Wilders-te-onthoofden.htm>
[Link no longer active]
I have followed GEERT WILDERS on TWITTER for the last year at least and
am aware by his RETWEETS that he indeed does continue to receive the
most graphically violent and depraved of death-treats (ie. having had
#419 - SLAUGHTERED MEAT placed in my mailbox on 15 NOVEMBER 2017 I know
how he feels), and his blog entry @ 0930 HRS ON 25 MAY 2023 which was
only on 24 JUNE 2023 accessed by a BING search, himself states:
"I receive thousands of death threats from Muslims in the name of the
Prophet Muhammad. But who was he really?"
RESUME TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE DIALOG: "Why should you, in relation to what
things are mine and not yours, then dictate what ought to be on my mind?
Such rubbish as YOU CALL IT because of your abject ignorance which you
make despite the absolute command given under SECTION VIII of the
Letters Patent to be "obedient, aiding and assisting", can earn you a
criminal charge of TREASON and 25 years imprisonment (if I wish to
pursue that matter against you), as a contempt of your life and business
towards the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN
PRINCIPLES encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the FEDERATION of
the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.
Why did you celebrate Christmas with a lunch on this 14 DECEMBER, 2016
when are you given to such hypocrisy and depravity of being with no
claim that you can make of Jesus Christ as you are a hypocrite and a
godless liar?
Stick to croissants and coffee--but leave the things which are mine to
my concern."
DOLF: “Who was it who wrote those ignorant comments in relation to my
attendance here yesterday?”
TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “I want you to leave my business now or I will
call the police.”
[Showed a contemptuous disdain by a backhanded flicking refuse away
gesture towards these documents as if was sh@t]
DOLF (paraphrase): “That is fine by me.
Because whether it is yourself, POLLYANNAR BIG PICTURE PHOTOGRAPHER or
REDD CATT CAFE, I will neither keep the company with fascist whores nor
to transact any business with those who come here to this country so as
to show such disrespect for the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES of our COMMONWEALTH.
You cannot thereby claim any piety, specially Christian identity (but
not limited to), your house is now desolate and anyone who does business
with you will now similarly lose their prospect of eternity.”
CHORUS OF PATRONS @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “Out!”
DOLF: “Go back to where you came from."
DATE OF SERVICE @ 1345 HOURS ON 29 DECEMBER 2016 OF COMPLAINT AS TO
INFERRED RACIAL HATRED BY PUBLIC EXCORIATION DIRECTED AGAINST DUTCH
HERITAGE AND THEIR FORTHRIGHT MANNER OF SPEECH AS IMPLICIT TO CULTURAL
IDENTITY AGAINST JINGOISM: CAROL @ TRIPLE FFF (#666) CAFE: "In
Australia, a lieutenant-governor is a standing appointment for a deputy
governor of a state, who acts in place of the governor if the governor
is unable, unavailable or unwilling to act.
In Victoria, there is a lieutenant-governor and an administrator. The
Chief Justice of Victoria is ex officio the administrator, unless he or
she is the lieutenant-governor, in which case, the next most senior
judge is the administrator. The lieutenant-governor takes on the
responsibilities of the governor when that post is vacant or when the
governor is out of the State or unable to act. The administrator takes
on those duties if both the governor and lieutenant-governor are not
able to act for the above reasons.
The lieutenant-governor is appointed by the governor on the advice of
the Premier of Victoria. Appointment as lieutenant-governor of itself
confers no powers or functions. If there is no governor or if the
governor is unavailable to act for a substantial period, the
lieutenant-governor assumes office as administrator and exercises all
the powers and functions of a governor. If expecting to be unavailable
for a short period only, the governor with the consent of the premier,
usually commissions the lieutenant-governor to act as deputy governor,
performing some or all of the powers and functions of the governor.
Marilyn Warren, the CHIEF JUSTICE OF VICTORIA (ie. in 1934 the *CHIEF*
*JUSTICE* had *FASCIST* *AFFILIATIONS*), is the current lieutenant-governor.
As of 28 MARCH 2014, the Commonwealth deputies of the Governor-General
are Dame Marie Bashir AD CVO and Alex Chernov AC QC. Further deputies
are appointed to exercise narrow powers, such as convening executive
meetings, opening parliament and swearing in new politicians.
There is no lieutenant-governor.
State governors hold a dormant commission to act as Administrator of the
Commonwealth should the governor-general die, resign, or be absent
overseas or on leave. By convention, the longest-serving state governor
acts as administrator.
Presently, the longest-serving state governor is Alex Chernov, who has
been Governor of Victoria since 8 April 2011. The second longest-serving
state governor is Paul de Jersey, who has been Governor of Queensland
since 29 July 2014.
On 1 August 2015, Paul de Jersey assumed the administration of the
Government of the Commonwealth of Australia."
TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE @ 1213 HOURS: “You might like to visit the police
station as we have reported you and I will take out an intervention
order against you if you persist in this manner.”
DOLF: “Since my actions and statements @ 0813 HOURS of this day have
been entirely in compliance with NATURE, LAW, ORDER and the JUSTICE of
this LAND as SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES which are defined by a Natural /
Common Law statement as to the existence of an egalitarian right and
that was in accord with such mathematical theoretical noumenon as
Intellectual Property of mine, and with specific regard to the computed
CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING of #287 given as:
#87 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 JUNE 2023 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20,
#1, #10, #1] /
#287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios (G316): 1)
necessary; 1a) what one can not do without, indispensable; 1b) connected
by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO*
*THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*
As that which was required as action of mindful compliance given by you
in the circumstances AS MY LAWFUL demand granted in the prudent and
reasonable exercise of MY PREROGATIVE AS AUTHORITY made in regard to a
submission given to SECTION VIII of the Letters Patent as defining the
AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES
encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the Federation of the
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.
Should your improper, impertinent, unrepentant and bellicose as
threatening public conduct such as this statement: “I will take out an
intervention order against you if you persist in this manner” continue.
I will recommend to the magistrate that a charge of TREASON pursuant to
Section 9A of the Crimes Act (1958) Victoria be brought against you and
that all the necessary documents relative to any successful prosecution
to the charge (as referenced here) have been already served on you.
I will bring your fascist conduct therefore into a proper mindfulness of
contrition and a duty before the law.
Do you understand that?”
DESPITE A SUMMARY OF THE INITIATING SITUATION WITH CAROL @ TRIPLE F
(#666) CAFE OCCURRING ON 15 DECEMBER 2016 OF PREJUDICE TOWARDS AN
IMPLICIT AND PROUD DUTCH IDENTITY BY JINGOISTIC ICONOCLASM AGAINST QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AS FIRST PRINCIPLES OF ANY JUSTIFIED EXISTENCE
WITHIN STATES OF THE COMMONWEALTH WAS MADE ON 23 DECEMBER 2016.
I was on 2 JANUARY, 2017 served with an APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR AN
INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER, 2016 so
as present myself by 0930 HOURS on 11 JANUARY, 2017 before the Sale
Magistrate's Court in the determination of the matter and any DECISION
to make a final determination is the issuing of a Personal Safety
Intervention Order.
The material details of that Application are as follows: "The RESPONDENT
is a customer at my cafe, [whom] I have known of the RESPONDENT for
[more than] 2 months. On 23 DECEMBER 2016 the RESPONDENT came into my
cafe to deliver me a copy of an indictment he said [that] he was
[lawfully] up[on] me. The RESPONDENT became enraged when I told him to
leave the premises and threw his papers in the bin. I was actually
serving elderly customers at the time and they were very upset as were
staff.
On 22 DECEMBER 2016 when I was on my way to an appointment, the
RESPONDENT yelled abuse at me on the street, the RESPONDENT has done the
same before and has left a couple of ranting messages on my business
page on Facebook.
I think the RESPONDENT will continue these behaviours as I have looked
into his Facebook [page] and Googled him, [and found in my view that] he
is a religious fanatic.
I reported the first incident [occurring on 15 DECEMBER, 2016] to [the]
police.
I don't wish to engage in mediation as the RESPONDENT is very volatile
in his anger and for his religious beliefs, the RESPONDENT me.
I require an order as the RESPONDENT has entered my place of work twice,
the RESPONDENT is scaring my staff, my customers and myself. Even
approaching me [with]in the street.
I feel the RESPONDENT will persist until he feels he is proven right, it
is religious based.
THE POLICE REFERRED ME TO THE COURT [SO AS] TO MAKE THIS APPLICATION."
#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW APPEAL DERIVED FROM THE BIBLICAL ACCOUNT
WHICH IS AGAINST THE UNIQUE INTERSECTION WITHIN NOUMENON AS INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
The #364 - QUESTION of #430 - LAW appeal derived from the Biblical
account which is against the unique intersection within NOUMENON as
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY related to the technologizing of QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 given the earlier date 21 AUGUST
1770 then relates to CAPTAIN COOK's diary entry of DUTCH PRIOR DISCOVERY
and POSSESSION having a LEGAL PRECEDENT applicable to PAPAL BULL dated 1493.
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.8.21&prototype:torah&idea:303,328,364,430>
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 55 [DATE: 2023.8.21, SUPER: #328
/ #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence;
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on
what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - ENDEAVOUR
(WU), EGO: #430 / #55 - Abstruse Mysterious Signs; I-Ching: H22 -
Elegance, Grace, Adorning, Luxuriance; Tetra: 54 - UNITY (K'UN)]
The date 13 FEBRUARY 962 was a relevant event involving a signing of the
DIPLOMA OTTONIANUM (also called the PACTUM OTTONIANUM, PRIVILEGIUM
OTTONIANUM or simply OTTONIANUM) as an agreement between POPE JOHN XII
and OTTO I, King of Germany and Italy. It confirmed the earlier DONATION
OF PEPIN dated 756, granting control of the Papal States to the Popes,
regularizing Papal elections, and clarifying the relationship between
the Popes AND the Holy Roman EMPERORS.
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.2.13&prototype:heteros&idea:297,352,430,460>
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 9, col: 3, nous: 59 [DATE: 2023.2.13, SUPER: #352
/ #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 - Perseverance,
Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG), EGO:
#460 / #59 - A Sensible Guide, Hold Fast To Reason; I-Ching: H42 -
Increase, Augmenting; Tetra: 13 - INCREASE (TSENG)]
Whereas the LATERAN TREATY (Italian: PATTI LATERANENSI; Latin: PACTA
LATERANENSIA) were later agreements signed on 11 FEBRUARY 1929 and
effective 7 JUNE 1929, made between the Kingdom of Italy under KING
VICTOR EMMANUEL III of Italy and the HOLY SEE under POPE PIUS XI to
settle the long-standing Roman Question.
It therefore has a consequence upon PAPAL BULL *INTER* *CAETERA* issued
by POPE ALEXANDER VI on 4 MAY 1493, those earlier relating to the
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR with the last *VOX* *IN* *EXCELSO* dated 22 MARCH 1312
and the more recent PAPAL BULL *MISERICORDIAE* *VULTUS* for INDICTION OF
THE EXTRAORDINARY JUBILEE OF MERCY (ANNOUNCED: #449 - 13 MARCH 2015 /
DECLARED: 2ND EASTER SUNDAY ON 11 APRIL 2015) occurring from #355 - 8
DECEMBER 2015 (Feast of the Immaculate Conception) to #355 - 20 NOVEMBER
2016.
To thereby substantiate a reasonable claim of an endemic IRISH CATHOLIC
basis for RACIAL / RELIGIOUS HATRED, WAR CRIMES and TREASON.
Despite its celebrated acknowledgement of the need to reject *TERRA*
*NULLIUS* as the legal foundation of Australia, in Mabo v Queensland (No
2) [1992] HCA 23; (1992) 175 CLR 1 (‘Mabo’) the Australian High Court
used a sleight-of-hand to tackle this paradox. First, native title was
defined as a fragile and incomplete title. Rather than recognising and
creating a robust legal version of the interests and responsibilities
created by customary law to authorise the complex relationships among
people and between people and their country (native title), the High
Court constructed native title as a highly circumscribed recognition
space – a limited set of artefacts of customary law and aboriginal title
that the British (and subsequently Australian) common law was able and
obliged to recognise as ‘property’. Having reduced the robust and
ancient jurisdictions of the Dreaming to the fragility of ‘native
title’, the High Court introduced a slippery notion of ‘co-existence’.
This notion was not an acknowledgement of the co-existence of Indigenous
and non-Indigenous interests in particular places, but an abstract
conceptualisation of legal interests in property that could exist
together. It was this abstract conceptualisation which was used to
address the persistent presence of Aboriginal people in cultural
landscapes that were now possessed by new owners whose title was
predicated on the imaginary of *TERRA* *NULLIUS* [as a SLANDER against
Dutch first discovery and possession acknowledged by COOK on 21 AUGUST
1770 in compliance with the legal precedent PAPAL BULL INTER CAETERA
issued by POPE ALEXANDER VI on 4 MAY 1493 and VAN DIEMAN'S LAND named
after a DUTCH GOVERNOR GENERAL and therefore subject to rule of law; cf:
Macquarie Law Journal 49, 2006]
The DUTCH SOVEREIGN during a STATE VISIT on 2 NOVEMBER 2016, stated:
"During this state visit, we will be celebrating the close bonds our
countries have forged over the centuries. But perhaps even more
important are the opportunities we see ahead of us. The Kingdom of the
Netherlands attaches great value to our close partnership with Australia
because we believe that, as like-minded nations, we stand stronger
together. Together we can find better answers to the challenges of our time.
...
Today, at a time when the international legal order is under pressure,
it is all the more important that we stand together to defend its
principles. Australia and the Netherlands are natural allies as
promoters of peace, justice and development, and we often work side by
side. Take our partnership a few years ago in Uruzgan in Afghanistan.
And our current efforts in the fight against terrorism in Syria and Iraq.
You have also given personal expression to the bond between our
countries. You were in Eindhoven on that dark day in July 2014, when the
first flights arrived carrying the remains of the victims of the downing
of MH17. For my wife and me, commemorating the Australian victims this
morning at the memorial was a very moving experience. We greatly
appreciate Australia's outstanding cooperation in the investigation of
the full facts, so that those responsible can be called to account, and
justice can be done.
...
Just as, for us, Australia is a window onto the Asia-Pacific region, we
want to be your window onto Europe.
As I said, Eendracht - Concord - was the name of the ship in which Dirk
Hartog sailed to Australia in 1616 [and such presence at Cape
Inscription, Shark Bay, Western Australia and recorded on a pewter dish
which translates as: 'arrived here on 25 October 1616']. And today, 400
years later, 'concord' is a fitting flag for us to sail under as we go
forward into the future.
Thank you for the warmth and friendship you always show us in Australia."

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartog_Plate>
Willem de Vlamingh found the 1616 Dirk Hartog pewter plate at Cape
Inscription, Shark Bay on 4 February 1697. Stress from flattening dinner
bowls to create the plates predisposed them to corrode and crack. The
Hartog text was copied and a new inscription recording the date of the
discovery by de Vlamingh and his crew was stamped with letter punches
into the metal. The recovered Hartog plate was taken to Batavia in Java
and is exhibited at the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. The de Vlamingh plate
was attached to a wooden post with rectangular iron-planking nails. As
the iron corroded the run-off caused differential corrosion reactions
that help form the complex patina. The fallen plate was discovered by
Hamelin in 1801 and attached to a new post. It was recovered by Louis de
Freycinet in 1818 and eventually taken to Paris where it remained until
given by the French people to the Australian government after World War II.
We provide herewith a document associated to our TRIPARTITE NUMBER
theoretical NOUMENON / GODHEAD as my sole INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relevant
to GNOSIS EX MACHINA as a nomenclature for consciousness instantiation
as the possibility for obtaining exclusive PATENTS for intelligent books
and knowledge spheres as requisite for a knowledge / sapient economy:
"DEVISING THE IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AND
HYPOTHESIS ON ONTIC VARIANCE BY TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WITHOUT
IDEOLOGICAL OR PARTISAN IMPETUS"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Letters%20Patent%20Variance.pdf>
ON THAT BASIS CAROL @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE's APPLICATION AND SUMMONS
FOR AN INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER
2016 OUGHT TO HAVE NO LOCUS STANDI WITHIN ANY COURT AS JURISDICTION
WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH SINCE IT IS AN ICONOCLASM AGAINST FIRST
PRINCIPLES being the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which as metakosemeo
is constitutionally the product of a CAESAROPAPISM intrinsic to QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT and the ontology of the human being (ie.
homosapiens) reflecting IMAGO DEI.
I believe the MAGISTRATE was of an IRISH DECENT and by NATURE would be
advancing an IRISH REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST / WORLD WAR ONE 2018 HIJACKING
SEDITIOUS / TREASONOUS CAUSE in their determinations and therefore ought
to have RECUSED THEMSELVES within the APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR AN
INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016 and
in hearings matters subsequent as especially CASE NUMBER: H12143475
lodged on 31 JULY 2017 which included the following item as grounds:
#3: ON 31.7.2017 AT 10AM [THE RESPONDENT] SHOWED ME A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE
MARION STATUE WITH[IN] THE PARK OPPOSITE WEARING A BALACLAVA AS TO
CONVEY OUR MUTUAL UNDERSTAND[ING] OF IT['S] PLACEMENT AS *AN* *ATTEMPT*
[*TO*] *SUBVERT* *OUR* *AUSTRALIAN* *HISTORY* *WHICH* *IS* *ABSENT* *OF*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *IMPOSITIONS* *UPON* *OUR* *BOER* / *ANZAC*
*TRADITION* *BY* *A* *SUBSTITUTED* *ETHIC*.
Our intent to pursue a legal claim of SLANDER by VEXATIOUS and
non-justiciable legal process, PUBLIC EXCORIATION promulgating RACIAL
AND RELIGIOUS HATRED against CAROL @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE as
encouragement for them to:
“Go back to where you came from."
ALSO PERSUE THE VICTORIA POLICE and STATE OF VICTORIA FOR PERSECUTION in
being implicitly a FASCST (ie. neither the police or the Chief Justice
have recanted such association which was manifestly evident in 1934)
VIOLATION of the FIRST PRINCIPLES which are constitutionally intrinsic
to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT.
You are going to be taught a lesson in TOTALITARIANISM and it's
PERSECUTION before the CENTENNIAL OF WORLD WAR TWO.
--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)
OUR LEGAL CASE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT OUGHT TO BE HEARD
BEFORE YOURS SENATOR LAMBIE:
I just thought to share with you, only three documents as IBAC briefing
NOTES relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
RENEWED IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018 CENTENNIAL by their
ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM against the COMMONWEALTH as the product
of a CEASAROPAPISM and deference given to PAPAL AUTHORITY. You would
probably be aware that BEN ROBERTS-SMITH was on 6 APRIL 2010 pictured
wearing KNIGHTS TEMPLAR CROSS, but it is unknown to me whether this was
jewellery or an affiliation with their later RENEWAL ON 2ND EASTER OF 11
APRIL 2015 as a calendar correspondence to the crucifixion of 3 APRIL 33 AD.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230613.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230620.pdf>
Herewith are details of the RUSSIANS similarly using a RELIGIOUS GAMBIT
(ie. the construction of the MAIN CATHEDRAL OF THE RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES:
CATHEDRAL OF THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) as some considerations on
natural disconcertions [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI),
#40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] by the RUSSIANs (REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM IDEA @328)
HAVING A VALID CONCERN (ie. the #33 - PHONEMES induces a pathological
characteristic within the TABLE TALK which includes JEWS, CHRISTIANS and
COMMUNISTS in the same class as exclusion group) ABOUT NAZI IDENTITY
(ie. "rewrite history and glorify fascists" [Wikileaks document ID:
08MOSCOW2656_a, dated 1 FEBRUARY 2008]) which is BELLIGERENTLY an
unresolved question of 90 years duration and could [as prima facie]
subject NATO to reparations within the UKRAINIAN proxy war.
As an ex-member of the police service I understand that #237 - USE OF
FORCE is a conceptual form presently deployed by our state police whose
motto is TENEZ LE DROIT / UPHOLD THE RIGHT that is also an ontic / deme
boundary and a general principle of #491 - AGENCY (ie. no less
applicable to healthcare) capacity in conformity to [... #40 - LAW /
MODEL (FE)] as then a functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST which is
distinct to the #111 - FALLACIOUS OR VACUOUS assertion that attaining
#71 - *DOMINION* [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)] is
judgement sensibility's ultimate end as it's centre of value.
[SEE UPDATED STATEMENT BELOW]
If you know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a product (ie. by letters
patent from the hand of QUEEN VICTORIA as EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE
FAITH) of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as
differentiated worldviews, then you might not comprehend the underly
HYPOSTASIS issues which can mitigate any culpability for alleged WAR CRIMES.
Firstly the machinery (#65 - SOLDIER / #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD) of STATE
as BIPARTITE worldview can lead to NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER
which may result in a disregard of other persons such as prisoners.
Secondly the BIPARTITE worldview can predispose one to adverse
behavioural reinforcement (eg: 20 year theatre of war with an ABSENCE OF
ANY VIABLE OBJECTIVE since they know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a
product of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as different
worldviews) as high acumen -/+ of DOMINION #n anchors resulting in
patterns [# ... # ... #] of behaviour responses which may not accord
with the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action as evidence of
prudent rather than instinctive action.
Lastly it is not known if there has been any investigation as to whether
such misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH
massacre was given imprimatur by the RSL members associated with KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN SOLDIERS as
potential associates) occurred in the advancement of the SEDITIOUS CAUSE
relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED
IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018 CENTENNIAL by their ATLANTIS 25
APRIL 1915 PHANTASM.
I'm just a retired private citizen, who watches TV and engages within
informal research into metaphysical and metempirical philosophy with the
objective of technologizing QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as a single
avenue of enquiry pursued now for some 27 years duration.
IF I MIGHT JUST CONTINUE ON THREE THOUGHTS:
Should the misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH
massacre was given imprimatur by the RSL members associated with KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN SOLDIERS as
potential associates) have occurred due to PROFESSIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
with AMERICAN SOLDIERS then IN AND OF ITSELF may be an undue adverse
influence since their REPUBLIC is not a product of any CAESAROPAPISM but
an iconoclastic consequence against such (ie. "We hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.") as notions which merely
intersect the ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (as then EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE FAITH).
Secondly the notion of ICONOCLASM against the TRIPARTITE WORLDVIEW of
VOLUNTARY FREEWILL when it is subject to a PREDISPOSITION through
ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie. war) from a
BIPARTITE worldview such as ISLAM which has its own ANTHROPOLOGICAL
CONSTRUCT of SUBJECT WILL as claim to piety.
As a #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION upon ICONOCLASM raised against the
BIPARTITE v's TRIPARTITE usage against this same #71 - DOMINION array
construct, we've expanded the hypothetical consideration applicable to
GEORGE FLOYD's "I can't breath" death by continual exertion of force in
total dominion as an extremely high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors which
may be the result of adverse behavioural reinforcement as belligerence
(ie. not necessarily reciprocated) that spirals to its ultimate end as
iconoclasm (ie.
Byzantine Greek εἰκονοκλάστης [TELOS: #984 (BY ISOPSEPHY) dolióō
(G1387): *DECEIT*, eidōleîon (G1493): *TEMPLE* *OF* *IDOLS*, echthrós
(G2190): *HOSTILE*; *OPPOSING* *GOD* *IN* *THE* *MIND*; *DEMONIC* *AS*
*BITTER* *ENEMY* *OF* *THE* *DIVINE* *GOVERNMENT*, syníēmi (G4920):
*COMBATANTS*, MALE: #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION, FEME: #417 - CAUSE OR
REASON, DEME: #155 - JUDGE OR UMPIRE] as etymology from εἰκών (eikṓn,
“figure, icon, pattern, archetype”) + κλάω (kláō, “to break, weaken,
frustrate”) + -της (-tēs, agent suffix representing a state of being)
) against the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which is constitutionally
intrinsic to the ontology of the human being (ie. homosapiens)
reflecting IMAGO DEI.
#885 as [#5, #10, #20, #800, #50] = eikṓn (G1504): {UMBRA: #885 % #41 =
#24} 1) an image, figure, likeness; 1a) *AN* *IMAGE* *OF* *THE* *THINGS*
(*THE* *HEAVENLY* *THINGS*); 1a1) used of the moral likeness of renewed
men to God; 1a2) the image of the Son of God, into which true Christians
are transformed, is likeness not only to the heavenly body, but also to
the most holy and blessed state of mind, which Christ possesses; 1b) the
image of one; 1b1) one in whom the likeness of any one is seen; 1b2)
*APPLIED* *TO* *MAN* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *HIS* *POWER* *OF* *COMMAND*;
1b3) to Christ on account of his divine nature and absolute moral
excellence;
#257 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #20, #30, #1,
#200, #1] /
#851 as [#20, #30, #1, #800] = kláō (G2806): {UMBRA: #851 % #41 = #31}
1) *TO* *BREAK*; 1a) used in the NT of the *BREAKING* *OF* *BREAD* *OR*
*COMMUNION*;
#676 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #300, #8, #200] = poiētḗs (G4163): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) a maker, a producer, author; 2) a doer, performer;
2a) *ONE* *WHO* *OBEYS* *OR* *FULFILS* *THE* *LAW*; 3) a poet;
I'm not a lawyer and only possess a modicum of knowledge, but I think
that the relevant jurisprudent principle is CASUS DATAE LEGIS to
describe the circumstance of a BIPARTITE iconoclasm against the
TRIPARTITE premise of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY as constitutionally
intrinsic to the ontology of the human being which would then conform to
IMMANUEL KANT'S representation of the unity of consciousness linking
together several other representations, or a representation of their
relation in a single concept (9: 101).In the Critique of Pure Reason he
characterizes judgment as [Pure general logic] deals with concepts,
judgments, and inferences, corresponding exactly to the functions and
order of those powers of the mind, which are comprehended under the
broad designation of understanding in general… If the understanding in
general is explained as the faculty of rules, then the power of judgment
is the faculty of subsuming under rules, i.e., of determining whether
something stands under a given rule (CASUS DATAE LEGIS) or not.
(A130-132/B170-172)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/Win2004/entries/kant-judgment/>
WHILST WE HAVE DESIGNATED THE SEMANTICAL BASIS FOR A RATIONAL FACULTY OF
RULES WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA
TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (then as EMPRESS and
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH). And UNDOUBTEDLY the relevant jurisprudent
principle of CASUS DATAE LEGIS is known [and conjectured upon but not
with any substantial clarity].
"Kant restricts the sense of 'Judgment" to the act of "subsuming under
rules, that is, of distinguishing whether something falls under a given
rule or not (CASUS DATAE LEGIS)" (id. A 132-34, B 171-74). This sense is
borrowed from lawyerly usage, not from logic, for, as Kant shows, logic
has nothing to say regarding this operation. There are, and there can
be, no rules regarding the application of rules. If Kant is right, a
sizable part of what we take to be "law," and almost all jurisprudence,
are nothing but a futile striving to overcome this essential unruliness
of judgment. How can it be that the saying of law is lawless?
Perhaps, however, even to lawyers, the essence of a judgment does not
lie in the application of a rule to a particular case, but rather in the
statement, or restatement, of the rule to be applied (eg: #451 - PRAXIS
OF RATIONALITY OF WHICH THERE IS NO KNOWLEDGE). If law consists of
rules, and if rules themselves are general propositions stating
obligations in general terms, then the properly 'judicial" in a judgment
would bet he stating of rules. The"case"would then matter only as
providing an occasion for such a ruling. If so, 'Judging," juridictio,
would find its most manifest instantiation in what we call
"legislation," legisatio, from legem tollere, the elevation of a lex, or
statute, to its position of authority, which is always at once also the
corresponding degradation of another.
Kant too, perhaps following this unmistakable hint of language, found a
kind of judgment in which the casus itself was manifestly decided,
indeed incontrovertibly, although the rule under which the fallen case
fell was still to be found, and would eventually deny itself entirely to
man's power to say. To this type of judgment, he devoted the most heroic
of his works, which he called a critique of the power of judgment,
Kritik der Urteilskraft. There the will to judge seems to run up against
its outer limits. In what sense indeed is there still a 'Judgment," that
is, a saying of law, when the supposed "law" withdraws into
ineffability?" [Vanderbuilt Law Review, Volume 48, Issue 4 Issue 4 - May
1995]
To that end we've included the broader statement on an identified
CHRISTOLOGICAL AND METASCHEMA OF EVASION WITH PARADIGM EQUIVALENCE TO
FASCIST IDENTITY (ie. the BIPARTITE @1 - SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY DYNAMIC / @5
- STATE AS ITS INVENTION), from which you can conclude that if ISLAM has
a CIRCUMSTANTIAL / SPECULATIVE CHRISTOLOGY THAT HAS NO CRUCIFIXION then
IPSO FACTO it is a METASCHEMA OF EVASION as being deployed which is
detrimental to anything but its ANTHROPOLOGICAL idealism.
#68 #11 #44
#17 #41 #65
#38 #71 #14
The TRIPARTITE use of a temporal heuristic as metakosmeo which has an
implicit conception of autonomy rather than a bipartite
HETEROS-AFFECTION (ie. I utilised this in relation to the #328 -
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE as its therapeutic imperative) stricture such
as the NUMI / NUMEN AUGUSTI [#38, #71, #14] metakinesis inducement as
imposition [#17, #41, #65] made upon autonomy.
On that physiological basis the police member's guilt in the elimination
of GEORGE FLOYD is mitigated. Any implicit adverse institutional [#68,
#11, #44] imperative which is self evident since we stated it before the
findings of those systemic prejudices were made known, ought not be ipso
facto imputed against the police officer's #237 - USE OF FORCE as an
AUTO-AFFECTIVE action.
Again, using the same #71 - DOMINION array construct, it ought to be
possible to resolve the #468: PERPLEXING QUESTION (#17) of prudent #519:
discernment (#68) made in relation to the #495: seminal cause (#44) for
the exercising of #462: dominion (#11) corresponding to #465: limits
(#14) and the viability of #492: freewill (#41).
#123 as [#40, #1, #10, #2, #10, #20, #600] = ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13 %
#41 = #13} 1) (Qal) *ENEMY*; 1a) personal; 1b) national;
#516 (-> #65) - *METAKOSMEO* *ASSOCIATOR* as [#6, #8, #6, #90, #6, #400] /
#519 (-> #68) as [#8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #5] /
#522 (-> #71) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6] = chûwts (H2351):
{UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) *OUTSIDE*, outward, street, the outside;
As the need for an enquiry method to determine viability of the DOMINION
array [] to assay the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action. A
high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors is evidence of prudent rather than
instinctive action.
Whilst my usage of language is not as superlative, I AM (ie. I = #123 -
JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / INTELLECT, AM = #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: @491
- PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY TO @1 - SELF) nevertheless able within a
TRIPARTITE paradigm as grounding for perspective to then accommodate by
syncretic progression DERRIDA's obtuse semantical construct which is a
BIPARTITE encapsulation of being as: "what he is trying to do with
auto-affection: if the auto-position, the automonstrative autotely of
the ‘I,’ even in the human, implies the ‘I’ to be an other that must
welcome within itself some irreducible hetero-affection."
Simply expressed as an ontic premise, if there are reciprocal I = #123 -
judgement sensibility / intellect, then an obligating norm is implied as
conformity to rule-based conventions:
#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rule
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference
object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META
LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - *JUPITER* *PRINCIPLE* as aesthetic (ie.
the hypotenuse thesis) which is made against #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
(#41 + #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY) being a methodology of #491 -
AGENCY that we redacted two policing #237 - USE OF FORCE scenarios (not
included here) as CASE STUDIES to their metaphysical constructs relative
to the DOMINION ARRAY in the context of the COMMONWEALTH being a
CAESAROPAPISM and DEFENDER [#44, #17, #38]@(#123 / #99 -- to deploy the
DOMINION array anchors as a TRIPARTITE intellectual construct against
the ontic substitution premise within the machinery as BIPARTITE
sovereign / autonomy dynamic) OF THE FAITH: DIEU ET MON DROIT conforming
to a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT.
"THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE #415 - *SON* (ie. FOSTERING (yǎng): to
raise; to *BRING* *UP* (*CHILDREN*, animals); to give birth / #81 - 𝍖養
= #532 - shâbar (H7665): *BRING* *TO* *THE* *BIRTH*) OF GOD... AND WENT
AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT [#1521 = praitṓrion (G4232): 'HEAD-QUARTERS' IN
A ROMAN CAMP; MAGNIFICENT PALACE OF HEROD (son of a hero) THE GREAT;
#341 - MAIN CATHEDRAL (TO THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) OF THE RUSSIAN
ARMED FORCES *CONSECRATION* ON 14 JUNE 2020 / #387 - *VICTORY* *DAY*
WHEN CONSTRUCTION OF THE CATHEDRAL WAS COMPLETED ON 9 MAY 2020] HALL ...
#509 - *YAHAD* (JEWISH / CHRISTIANS) / #516 - *METAKOSMEO* ASSOCIATOR =
3 APRIL 33 AD
#232 - *CUNNING* *PLAN* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as
[#20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] /
#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as
[#5, #20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] = krázō (G2896): {UMBRA: #928 % #41 =
#26} 1) to croak; 1a) of the *CRY* *OF* *A* *RAVEN*; 1b) hence, to cry
out, cry aloud, vociferate; 1c) *TO* *CRY* *OR* *PRAY* *FOR*
*VENGEANCE*; 2) to cry; 2a) *CRY* *OUT* *ALOUD*, speak with a loud voice;
BUT THE JEWS *CRIED*-G2896: OUT, SAYING IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU
ART NOT CAESAR'S FRIEND: WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH
AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:7, 12]
It ought to be understood that #237 - USE OF FORCE is a conceptual form
presently deployed by our state police whose motto is TENEZ LE DROIT /
UPHOLD THE RIGHT that is also an ontic / deme boundary and a general
principle of #491 - AGENCY (ie. no less applicable to healthcare)
capacity in conformity to [... #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] as then a
functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST which is distinct to the #111 -
FALLACIOUS OR VACUOUS assertion that attaining #71 - *DOMINION* [#38 -
FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)] is judgement sensibility's
ultimate end as it's centre of value.
#71 as [#1, #30, #10, #30] /
#73 as [#6, #1, #30, #6, #30] /
#81 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #10] /
#111 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #600] /
#123 as [#2, #1, #30, #10, #30, #10, #600] = ʼĕlîyl (H457): {UMBRA: #71
% #41 = #30} 1) of nought, *GOOD* *FOR* *NOTHING*, worthless; 1a) *OF*
*PHYSICIANS*, a shepherd, *A* *DIVINATION*; 1b) of false gods;
Which is also a requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA being a nomenclature
provision of acceptable meta descriptors for articulating the viable
boundary (ie. SUGGESTED BY THE EXPRESSION nán táo fǎ wǎng (難逃法網): [#79 -
𝍔難 = #530 / #49 - 𝌶逃 = #500 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - IT IS HARD TO ESCAPE
THE DRAGNET OF THE LAW; THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW) of consciousness
instantiation, having a correspondence to the cosmological primitives
(ie. LAWS OF NATURE: fǎ dù (法度): [#40 - 𝌭法 = #491 / #52 - 𝌹度 = #503]
- (A) LAW / chéng wén fǎ (成文法): [#73 - 𝍎成 = #524 / #47 - 𝌴文 = #498 /
#40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - STATUTE) published within the CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY (太玄經) TETRADS of 4 BCE.
It is UNLIKELY (in my humble opinion) that you'll find any COMPETENT
JUDGE let alone a PROSECUTOR who could make any determination of WAR
CRIMES in the circumstance of a BIPARTITE ICONOCLASM against the
TRIPARTITE premise of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY.
Such a pity then that you would not be able to prosecute WAR CRIMES on
the basis of either NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER or a
PREDISPOSITION TO ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie.
war) as ICONOCLASM against FREEWILL from a BIPARTITE worldview such as
ISLAM which claims a piety established upon a metaphorical root (eg:
#232 - meteor idol secreted within the KAABA) and a demanded SUBJECT WILL.
However if misconduct occurred in the advancement of the SEDITIOUS CAUSE
relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED
IN 2015 I would prosecute.
Otherwise, I would propose the adoption of a #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277
- RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST methodology as an effective means for assaying
and negation by the introduction of an alternative postulate upon the
thinking dynamic concept of #123 - INTELLECT and its relationship to
#164 - DOMINION as impetus for #205 - STRATEGIC ACTION.
Towards that end I have provided defence media with the ONTIC as
MATHEMATICAL IDEA TEMPLATE to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT which as
ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY and ONTIC VARIANCE provides a CENTRAL means
for FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS of FREEWILL.
Those philosophical contemplations which have taken some considerable
time to formulate into a comprehensive, substantial and persuasive
jurisprudent argument was then the basis as to the nature of a
disclosure recorded within A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST INTO THE
INCIDENT AT THE STAR HOTEL, 173 RAYMOND STREET, SALE @ 1130 TO 1245
HOURS ON SUNDAY 26 MARCH 2017:
"Have dealt with the male customer once prior, where ... [CENSORED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 33(1)] ... On this particular occasion, he
mentioned having been up since 2 AM working on ANTI-TERRORISM documents,
that he was a very important person to the county and had UNUSUAL
SKILLS, etc. All of which he revealed in a quick conversation before
ordering."
Is it not as "ANTI-TERRORISM" action, by an "UNUSUAL SKILL" to exercise
faith in GOD with the intellectual and spontaneous capacity in writing a
POEM constituting a dialectic depth of fifteen lines including
consecutive WORDS OF THE DAY for 8 to 12 DECEMBER 2016;
www.dictionary.com and then weaponise it subsequently, with just a TITLE
CHANGE on 6 MARCH 2022 as [#371, #392, #424, #492] for the occasion of
an important anniversary, as resonance to the RUSSIAN DAY OF REMEMBRANCE
AND SORROW (the day Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1941) on 22 JUNE
2023?
TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “Why did you put this rubbish on our Triple F Cafe
Facebook Page?”
<https://www.facebook.com/Triple-F-Cafe-freshfastfood-225837177482258>
DOLF: "Because that is what occupied my mind (ie. it is a demand of
compliance which was made to 1.6 billion people) when I came into your
cafe this last morning CAROL (manly, strong)...
NOTE: The POEM was initially written as empathetic response to a
PERVERSE JUDGMENT on 9 DECEMBER 2016 by the DUTCH COURTS within CASE
NUMBER: 09/837304-15 against GILDER'S public speech on 19 MARCH 2014:
On 12 MARCH 2014 the Dutch politician GEERT WILDERS and several members
of his party, PVV, also known as The Freedom Party, visited a market in
The Hague. Part of their visit was broadcast on national TV and GEERT
WILDERS said that his party would make the city more safe, more
sociable, and if possible, make it a city with fewer Moroccans. When
later confronted with his statement WILDERS held that he had merely
referred to criminal Moroccans and Moroccans receiving benefits from the
state.
On 19 MARCH 2014 the Freedom Party held an election rally at CAFÉ DE
TIJD in The Hague. During the meeting, GEERT WILDERS held a speech which
was recorded and broadcast on TV. In his speech he stated: “Before I go,
I would like everyone here to answer the following three questions.
Three questions, please give a clear answer which defines our party, the
PVV. Do you want more or less European Union?” The crowd present
repeatedly shouted “less”. WILDERS then went on to pose the second
question: “Do you want more or less Labour Party?” The crowd again
shouted “less”. WILDERS continued: “And the third question is, and
actually I’m not allowed to say it, because you get reported to the
police, and maybe there are even D66 prosecutors who will launch a case,
but freedom of expression is a great good and we haven’t said anything
that isn’t allowed, we haven’t said anything that’s incorrect, so I ask
you: do you want more or fewer Moroccans in this city and in the
Netherlands?”. The crowd repeatedly shouted “less”. GEERT WILDERS then
concluded his speech with the words: “Nah, we’ll arrange it”.
At the election meeting a coordinator (witness 3) from the PVV had been
aware that WILDERS would ask the public whether they wanted fewer
Moroccans. The coordinator had been asked (by witness 4) to instruct the
public in advance of the question and answer. Before the speech witness
4 had heard GEERT WILDERS emphasize that it should be as strong as
possible so the content would be picked up by the press and broadcast.
The legal implications of the speech had not been discussed. The issue
of including the topic of Moroccans or criminal Moroccans was discussed
and there was some concern whether there would be a prompt response from
the public. This was the reason why witness 4 called witness 3 and asked
him to ensure that a proper interaction would take place.
Among the many Dutch politicians who have had a FATWA [Arabic: فتوى,
TELOS: #487 - RITUAL ADMINISTRATION (#36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG); MALE:
#237 - USE OF FORCE; FEME: #163 - ANGRY, RAGING, VEXED; ONTIC: #156 -
LIVING SUBSTANCE; DEME: #548 - COMMANDMENT] issued against them,
possibly the best-known internationally is GEERT WILDERS. In 2008
WILDERS received 285 death threats, with a further 264 aimed at all
Dutch politicians. There were a total of 145 protection orders for
WILDERS in 2006; in 2005 there were 110.

<https://gatesofvienna.net/2010/09/australian-fatwa-behead-wilders/>
An Australian imam named FEIZ MUHAMMAD who as head of the Global Islamic
Youth Centre in Liverpool, a suburb of Sydney is viewed by intelligence
agencies worldwide as one of the main jihadist ideologues, a great
inspiration for young Western Muslim radicals had issued a FATWA calling
for the Dutch politician’s beheading.
According to Dutch newspaper Elsevier on 3 SEPTEMBER 2010: "PVV leader
GEERT WILDERS [was] angry at the Dutch Intelligence Service [AIVD]. The
AIVD is in the possession of a sound recording on which WILDERS is
threatened with death by the imam on a secluded site of jihadists, in
response to questions by Dutch radicals says:
“We see the evil filth of people such as that filthy Dutch politician.
Anyone who mocks our learning, laughs at the Islam and degrades it must
enter death, decapitate him, cut off his head.”.
The PVV leader was only informed in detail about the matter around 2
SEPTEMBER 2010. Accordingly WILDERS says he is shocked, and last night
consulted ERIC AKERBOOM, National Coordinator for Counterterrorism
(NCTb). “I urgently want to know why the NCTb and AIVD never informed me
about this.”
He also asked “what kind of consequences this has for me,” and called
the recording “terrible”."
<http://www.elsevier.nl/web/Nieuws/Nederland/274863/Radicale-imam-adviseert-Geert-Wilders-te-onthoofden.htm>
[Link no longer active]
I have followed GEERT WILDERS on TWITTER for the last year at least and
am aware by his RETWEETS that he indeed does continue to receive the
most graphically violent and depraved of death-treats (ie. having had
#419 - SLAUGHTERED MEAT placed in my mailbox on 15 NOVEMBER 2017 I know
how he feels), and his blog entry @ 0930 HRS ON 25 MAY 2023 which was
only on 24 JUNE 2023 accessed by a BING search, himself states:
"I receive thousands of death threats from Muslims in the name of the
Prophet Muhammad. But who was he really?"
RESUME TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE DIALOG: "Why should you, in relation to what
things are mine and not yours, then dictate what ought to be on my mind?
Such rubbish as YOU CALL IT because of your abject ignorance which you
make despite the absolute command given under SECTION VIII of the
Letters Patent to be "obedient, aiding and assisting", can earn you a
criminal charge of TREASON and 25 years imprisonment (if I wish to
pursue that matter against you), as a contempt of your life and business
towards the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN
PRINCIPLES encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the FEDERATION of
the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.
Why did you celebrate Christmas with a lunch on this 14 DECEMBER, 2016
when are you given to such hypocrisy and depravity of being with no
claim that you can make of Jesus Christ as you are a hypocrite and a
godless liar?
Stick to croissants and coffee--but leave the things which are mine to
my concern."
DOLF: “Who was it who wrote those ignorant comments in relation to my
attendance here yesterday?”
TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “I want you to leave my business now or I will
call the police.”
[Showed a contemptuous disdain by a backhanded flicking refuse away
gesture towards these documents as if was sh@t]
DOLF (paraphrase): “That is fine by me.
Because whether it is yourself, POLLYANNAR BIG PICTURE PHOTOGRAPHER or
REDD CATT CAFE, I will neither keep the company with fascist whores nor
to transact any business with those who come here to this country so as
to show such disrespect for the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES of our COMMONWEALTH.
You cannot thereby claim any piety, specially Christian identity (but
not limited to), your house is now desolate and anyone who does business
with you will now similarly lose their prospect of eternity.”
CHORUS OF PATRONS @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “Out!”
DOLF: “Go back to where you came from."
DATE OF SERVICE @ 1345 HOURS ON 29 DECEMBER 2016 OF COMPLAINT AS TO
INFERRED RACIAL HATRED BY PUBLIC EXCORIATION DIRECTED AGAINST DUTCH
HERITAGE AND THEIR FORTHRIGHT MANNER OF SPEECH AS IMPLICIT TO CULTURAL
IDENTITY AGAINST JINGOISM: CAROL @ TRIPLE FFF (#666) CAFE: "In
Australia, a lieutenant-governor is a standing appointment for a deputy
governor of a state, who acts in place of the governor if the governor
is unable, unavailable or unwilling to act.
In Victoria, there is a lieutenant-governor and an administrator. The
Chief Justice of Victoria is ex officio the administrator, unless he or
she is the lieutenant-governor, in which case, the next most senior
judge is the administrator. The lieutenant-governor takes on the
responsibilities of the governor when that post is vacant or when the
governor is out of the State or unable to act. The administrator takes
on those duties if both the governor and lieutenant-governor are not
able to act for the above reasons.
The lieutenant-governor is appointed by the governor on the advice of
the Premier of Victoria. Appointment as lieutenant-governor of itself
confers no powers or functions. If there is no governor or if the
governor is unavailable to act for a substantial period, the
lieutenant-governor assumes office as administrator and exercises all
the powers and functions of a governor. If expecting to be unavailable
for a short period only, the governor with the consent of the premier,
usually commissions the lieutenant-governor to act as deputy governor,
performing some or all of the powers and functions of the governor.
Marilyn Warren, the CHIEF JUSTICE OF VICTORIA (ie. in 1934 the *CHIEF*
*JUSTICE* had *FASCIST* *AFFILIATIONS*), is the current lieutenant-governor.
As of 28 MARCH 2014, the Commonwealth deputies of the Governor-General
are Dame Marie Bashir AD CVO and Alex Chernov AC QC. Further deputies
are appointed to exercise narrow powers, such as convening executive
meetings, opening parliament and swearing in new politicians.
There is no lieutenant-governor.
State governors hold a dormant commission to act as Administrator of the
Commonwealth should the governor-general die, resign, or be absent
overseas or on leave. By convention, the longest-serving state governor
acts as administrator.
Presently, the longest-serving state governor is Alex Chernov, who has
been Governor of Victoria since 8 April 2011. The second longest-serving
state governor is Paul de Jersey, who has been Governor of Queensland
since 29 July 2014.
On 1 August 2015, Paul de Jersey assumed the administration of the
Government of the Commonwealth of Australia."
TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE @ 1213 HOURS: “You might like to visit the police
station as we have reported you and I will take out an intervention
order against you if you persist in this manner.”
DOLF: “Since my actions and statements @ 0813 HOURS of this day have
been entirely in compliance with NATURE, LAW, ORDER and the JUSTICE of
this LAND as SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES which are defined by a Natural /
Common Law statement as to the existence of an egalitarian right and
that was in accord with such mathematical theoretical noumenon as
Intellectual Property of mine, and with specific regard to the computed
CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING of #287 given as:
#87 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 JUNE 2023 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20,
#1, #10, #1] /
#287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios (G316): 1)
necessary; 1a) what one can not do without, indispensable; 1b) connected
by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO*
*THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*
As that which was required as action of mindful compliance given by you
in the circumstances AS MY LAWFUL demand granted in the prudent and
reasonable exercise of MY PREROGATIVE AS AUTHORITY made in regard to a
submission given to SECTION VIII of the Letters Patent as defining the
AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES
encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the Federation of the
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.
Should your improper, impertinent, unrepentant and bellicose as
threatening public conduct such as this statement: “I will take out an
intervention order against you if you persist in this manner” continue.
I will recommend to the magistrate that a charge of TREASON pursuant to
Section 9A of the Crimes Act (1958) Victoria be brought against you and
that all the necessary documents relative to any successful prosecution
to the charge (as referenced here) have been already served on you.
I will bring your fascist conduct therefore into a proper mindfulness of
contrition and a duty before the law.
Do you understand that?”
DESPITE A SUMMARY OF THE INITIATING SITUATION WITH CAROL @ TRIPLE F
(#666) CAFE OCCURRING ON 15 DECEMBER 2016 OF PREJUDICE TOWARDS AN
IMPLICIT AND PROUD DUTCH IDENTITY BY JINGOISTIC ICONOCLASM AGAINST QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AS FIRST PRINCIPLES OF ANY JUSTIFIED EXISTENCE
WITHIN STATES OF THE COMMONWEALTH WAS MADE ON 23 DECEMBER 2016.
I was on 2 JANUARY, 2017 served with an APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR AN
INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER, 2016 so
as present myself by 0930 HOURS on 11 JANUARY, 2017 before the Sale
Magistrate's Court in the determination of the matter and any DECISION
to make a final determination is the issuing of a Personal Safety
Intervention Order.
The material details of that Application are as follows: "The RESPONDENT
is a customer at my cafe, [whom] I have known of the RESPONDENT for
[more than] 2 months. On 23 DECEMBER 2016 the RESPONDENT came into my
cafe to deliver me a copy of an indictment he said [that] he was
[lawfully] up[on] me. The RESPONDENT became enraged when I told him to
leave the premises and threw his papers in the bin. I was actually
serving elderly customers at the time and they were very upset as were
staff.
On 22 DECEMBER 2016 when I was on my way to an appointment, the
RESPONDENT yelled abuse at me on the street, the RESPONDENT has done the
same before and has left a couple of ranting messages on my business
page on Facebook.
I think the RESPONDENT will continue these behaviours as I have looked
into his Facebook [page] and Googled him, [and found in my view that] he
is a religious fanatic.
I reported the first incident [occurring on 15 DECEMBER, 2016] to [the]
police.
I don't wish to engage in mediation as the RESPONDENT is very volatile
in his anger and for his religious beliefs, the RESPONDENT me.
I require an order as the RESPONDENT has entered my place of work twice,
the RESPONDENT is scaring my staff, my customers and myself. Even
approaching me [with]in the street.
I feel the RESPONDENT will persist until he feels he is proven right, it
is religious based.
THE POLICE REFERRED ME TO THE COURT [SO AS] TO MAKE THIS APPLICATION."
#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW APPEAL DERIVED FROM THE BIBLICAL ACCOUNT
WHICH IS AGAINST THE UNIQUE INTERSECTION WITHIN NOUMENON AS INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
The #364 - QUESTION of #430 - LAW appeal derived from the Biblical
account which is against the unique intersection within NOUMENON as
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY related to the technologizing of QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 given the earlier date 21 AUGUST
1770 then relates to CAPTAIN COOK's diary entry of DUTCH PRIOR DISCOVERY
and POSSESSION having a LEGAL PRECEDENT applicable to PAPAL BULL dated 1493.
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.8.21&prototype:torah&idea:303,328,364,430>
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 55 [DATE: 2023.8.21, SUPER: #328
/ #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence;
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on
what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - ENDEAVOUR
(WU), EGO: #430 / #55 - Abstruse Mysterious Signs; I-Ching: H22 -
Elegance, Grace, Adorning, Luxuriance; Tetra: 54 - UNITY (K'UN)]
The date 13 FEBRUARY 962 was a relevant event involving a signing of the
DIPLOMA OTTONIANUM (also called the PACTUM OTTONIANUM, PRIVILEGIUM
OTTONIANUM or simply OTTONIANUM) as an agreement between POPE JOHN XII
and OTTO I, King of Germany and Italy. It confirmed the earlier DONATION
OF PEPIN dated 756, granting control of the Papal States to the Popes,
regularizing Papal elections, and clarifying the relationship between
the Popes AND the Holy Roman EMPERORS.
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.2.13&prototype:heteros&idea:297,352,430,460>
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 9, col: 3, nous: 59 [DATE: 2023.2.13, SUPER: #352
/ #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 - Perseverance,
Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG), EGO:
#460 / #59 - A Sensible Guide, Hold Fast To Reason; I-Ching: H42 -
Increase, Augmenting; Tetra: 13 - INCREASE (TSENG)]
Whereas the LATERAN TREATY (Italian: PATTI LATERANENSI; Latin: PACTA
LATERANENSIA) were later agreements signed on 11 FEBRUARY 1929 and
effective 7 JUNE 1929, made between the Kingdom of Italy under KING
VICTOR EMMANUEL III of Italy and the HOLY SEE under POPE PIUS XI to
settle the long-standing Roman Question.
It therefore has a consequence upon PAPAL BULL *INTER* *CAETERA* issued
by POPE ALEXANDER VI on 4 MAY 1493, those earlier relating to the
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR with the last *VOX* *IN* *EXCELSO* dated 22 MARCH 1312
and the more recent PAPAL BULL *MISERICORDIAE* *VULTUS* for INDICTION OF
THE EXTRAORDINARY JUBILEE OF MERCY (ANNOUNCED: #449 - 13 MARCH 2015 /
DECLARED: 2ND EASTER SUNDAY ON 11 APRIL 2015) occurring from #355 - 8
DECEMBER 2015 (Feast of the Immaculate Conception) to #355 - 20 NOVEMBER
2016.
To thereby substantiate a reasonable claim of an endemic IRISH CATHOLIC
basis for RACIAL / RELIGIOUS HATRED, WAR CRIMES and TREASON.
Despite its celebrated acknowledgement of the need to reject *TERRA*
*NULLIUS* as the legal foundation of Australia, in Mabo v Queensland (No
2) [1992] HCA 23; (1992) 175 CLR 1 (‘Mabo’) the Australian High Court
used a sleight-of-hand to tackle this paradox. First, native title was
defined as a fragile and incomplete title. Rather than recognising and
creating a robust legal version of the interests and responsibilities
created by customary law to authorise the complex relationships among
people and between people and their country (native title), the High
Court constructed native title as a highly circumscribed recognition
space – a limited set of artefacts of customary law and aboriginal title
that the British (and subsequently Australian) common law was able and
obliged to recognise as ‘property’. Having reduced the robust and
ancient jurisdictions of the Dreaming to the fragility of ‘native
title’, the High Court introduced a slippery notion of ‘co-existence’.
This notion was not an acknowledgement of the co-existence of Indigenous
and non-Indigenous interests in particular places, but an abstract
conceptualisation of legal interests in property that could exist
together. It was this abstract conceptualisation which was used to
address the persistent presence of Aboriginal people in cultural
landscapes that were now possessed by new owners whose title was
predicated on the imaginary of *TERRA* *NULLIUS* [as a SLANDER against
Dutch first discovery and possession acknowledged by COOK on 21 AUGUST
1770 in compliance with the legal precedent PAPAL BULL INTER CAETERA
issued by POPE ALEXANDER VI on 4 MAY 1493 and VAN DIEMAN'S LAND named
after a DUTCH GOVERNOR GENERAL and therefore subject to rule of law; cf:
Macquarie Law Journal 49, 2006]
The DUTCH SOVEREIGN during a STATE VISIT on 2 NOVEMBER 2016, stated:
"During this state visit, we will be celebrating the close bonds our
countries have forged over the centuries. But perhaps even more
important are the opportunities we see ahead of us. The Kingdom of the
Netherlands attaches great value to our close partnership with Australia
because we believe that, as like-minded nations, we stand stronger
together. Together we can find better answers to the challenges of our time.
...
Today, at a time when the international legal order is under pressure,
it is all the more important that we stand together to defend its
principles. Australia and the Netherlands are natural allies as
promoters of peace, justice and development, and we often work side by
side. Take our partnership a few years ago in Uruzgan in Afghanistan.
And our current efforts in the fight against terrorism in Syria and Iraq.
You have also given personal expression to the bond between our
countries. You were in Eindhoven on that dark day in July 2014, when the
first flights arrived carrying the remains of the victims of the downing
of MH17. For my wife and me, commemorating the Australian victims this
morning at the memorial was a very moving experience. We greatly
appreciate Australia's outstanding cooperation in the investigation of
the full facts, so that those responsible can be called to account, and
justice can be done.
...
Just as, for us, Australia is a window onto the Asia-Pacific region, we
want to be your window onto Europe.
As I said, Eendracht - Concord - was the name of the ship in which Dirk
Hartog sailed to Australia in 1616 [and such presence at Cape
Inscription, Shark Bay, Western Australia and recorded on a pewter dish
which translates as: 'arrived here on 25 October 1616']. And today, 400
years later, 'concord' is a fitting flag for us to sail under as we go
forward into the future.
Thank you for the warmth and friendship you always show us in Australia."

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartog_Plate>
Willem de Vlamingh found the 1616 Dirk Hartog pewter plate at Cape
Inscription, Shark Bay on 4 February 1697. Stress from flattening dinner
bowls to create the plates predisposed them to corrode and crack. The
Hartog text was copied and a new inscription recording the date of the
discovery by de Vlamingh and his crew was stamped with letter punches
into the metal. The recovered Hartog plate was taken to Batavia in Java
and is exhibited at the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. The de Vlamingh plate
was attached to a wooden post with rectangular iron-planking nails. As
the iron corroded the run-off caused differential corrosion reactions
that help form the complex patina. The fallen plate was discovered by
Hamelin in 1801 and attached to a new post. It was recovered by Louis de
Freycinet in 1818 and eventually taken to Paris where it remained until
given by the French people to the Australian government after World War II.
We provide herewith a document associated to our TRIPARTITE NUMBER
theoretical NOUMENON / GODHEAD as my sole INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relevant
to GNOSIS EX MACHINA as a nomenclature for consciousness instantiation
as the possibility for obtaining exclusive PATENTS for intelligent books
and knowledge spheres as requisite for a knowledge / sapient economy:
"DEVISING THE IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AND
HYPOTHESIS ON ONTIC VARIANCE BY TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WITHOUT
IDEOLOGICAL OR PARTISAN IMPETUS"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Letters%20Patent%20Variance.pdf>
ON THAT BASIS CAROL @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE's APPLICATION AND SUMMONS
FOR AN INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER
2016 OUGHT TO HAVE NO LOCUS STANDI WITHIN ANY COURT AS JURISDICTION
WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH SINCE IT IS AN ICONOCLASM AGAINST FIRST
PRINCIPLES being the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which as metakosemeo
is constitutionally the product of a CAESAROPAPISM intrinsic to QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT and the ontology of the human being (ie.
homosapiens) reflecting IMAGO DEI.
I believe the MAGISTRATE was of an IRISH DECENT and by NATURE would be
advancing an IRISH REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST / WORLD WAR ONE 2018 HIJACKING
SEDITIOUS / TREASONOUS CAUSE in their determinations and therefore ought
to have RECUSED THEMSELVES within the APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR AN
INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016 and
in hearings matters subsequent as especially CASE NUMBER: H12143475
lodged on 31 JULY 2017 which included the following item as grounds:
#3: ON 31.7.2017 AT 10AM [THE RESPONDENT] SHOWED ME A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE
MARION STATUE WITH[IN] THE PARK OPPOSITE WEARING A BALACLAVA AS TO
CONVEY OUR MUTUAL UNDERSTAND[ING] OF IT['S] PLACEMENT AS *AN* *ATTEMPT*
[*TO*] *SUBVERT* *OUR* *AUSTRALIAN* *HISTORY* *WHICH* *IS* *ABSENT* *OF*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *IMPOSITIONS* *UPON* *OUR* *BOER* / *ANZAC*
*TRADITION* *BY* *A* *SUBSTITUTED* *ETHIC*.
Our intent to pursue a legal claim of SLANDER by VEXATIOUS and
non-justiciable legal process, PUBLIC EXCORIATION promulgating RACIAL
AND RELIGIOUS HATRED against CAROL @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE as
encouragement for them to:
“Go back to where you came from."
ALSO PERSUE THE VICTORIA POLICE and STATE OF VICTORIA FOR PERSECUTION in
being implicitly a FASCST (ie. neither the police or the Chief Justice
have recanted such association which was manifestly evident in 1934)
VIOLATION of the FIRST PRINCIPLES which are constitutionally intrinsic
to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT.
You are going to be taught a lesson in TOTALITARIANISM and it's
PERSECUTION before the CENTENNIAL OF WORLD WAR TWO.
--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)
0 new messages