My problem with these thugs are they only get on trains to mainly
vandalize them and harass passengers.
So it would make sense to do something as opposed to nothing or
consider improving "what is"
Digital cameras 3 meg or better (most are 12 meg or even more) take
time stamped photos, very much superior quality to CCTV cameras, which
so far take poor quality "snaps" (I see them in the local paper when
looking for thug usually for assult & robbery). But are improving.
The videos though are good for jogging witnesses memory of events and
can help identify. Snaps really come into their own for publishing in
paper
As for used for evidence as long as a witness can
state/testifiy/back/confirm them and that they saw the incident
photographs becomes legal so does CCTV. On their own a Judge can still
ask to see them and act on them. Witness's though are still crucial.
Lawyers don't like evidence does them out of a job, that's what the
main objection about them is. If the law worked Lawyers would have to
reduce prices (can't even sue them?)
For the home it only costs $20 at local pub to show the photo to get
the photo'ed thugs ears removed. I'm finding thugs don't like being
photographed
Petzl
--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the judiciary must apply the law!
Sir John Downer QC stated, when the Australian Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations, ‘Our Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian Commonwealth’.