It is now running irregularly. ARHS Qld ran two trips there in 2001.
AFAIK the first trip rode on the line; the second trip didn't.
--
Regards
Roderick Smith
Rail News Victoria Editor
Don't feed aus.rail trolls: post about railways and not about people.
TrainKid31 <kid_indest...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
Umm ... they rode in what? an ore hopper? The Weipa line doesn't have
anything to transport passengers with. Think you may want to double-check
that one
They also did the Gulflander too.
> --
> Regards
> Roderick Smith
> Rail News Victoria Editor
--
Dean Stalker
Webmaster - QRIG.org
List Owner - QRIG Mailing List
http://www.qrig.org/
Email: dean.s...@qrig.org
ARHS-Qld Diesel Preservation Group Volunteer
--
Regards
Roderick Smith
Rail News Victoria Editor
Dean Stalker <dean.s...@qrig.org> wrote in article
<SBwA8.79000$o66.249100@news-
They use what is bascially an Victorian N class, a Clyde 3000hp loco,
GML10, later known as GML20 and now know as Comalco's R1004 that came
from Goldsworthy Mining in NW WA. It was shipped to Wepia in 1994. It
hauls 4125 tonne trains from ANdoom mine to Lorim Point loading. The
loco was delivered new to Goldsworthy 1990 in the V/line paint scheme,
but never worked in Vic or AFAIK never ran on BG bogies. This info is
from "Loco's of Australia", published 1996 and at time of writing the
line was hauling 7.5mtpa.
It is possible things have changed, last year I looked at a website
from someone in Ausrail with photos and more recent info. Maybe that
Ausrailer could help more.
If a ARHS run was done, it would have been using crew cars or
something, I doubt anything was transported to Wepia for the trip.
This line is not on a lot of maps, even some rail publications don't
acknowledge the line and I have worked with ex-Comalco Weipa employees
who didn't know it existed.
Hope this helps
Shane
Lw was designated trailing only due to its very rough riding. Later, its
engine was removed and put into another L class (can't remember which).
Crews reported much vibration from the engine, and the engine had been in
that state for several years but nobody ever noticed, the engine being in a
trailing only loco. Lw276 also had some other differences from L class, eg.
horn placement, engine panel louvre location, battery box, double skin roof,
door placement, etc etc. Lw276 eventually ended up at Forrestfield, gutted.
When did it get shifted to South Dynon?
--
Rgds
J. Boles
Sydney, Australia
--------------------------------------------------
jaboles AT ihug DOT com DOT au
jaboles AT crosswinds DOT net
jonathanboles AT hotmail DOT com
decoy-...@spamtrasher.com
--------------------------------------------------
Remove 'NOSPAM' when replying (newsgroups only)
When I go to Cape York later this year I will have a look!
--
Paul Jones
http://peejay.is.dreaming.org
If R1004 is basically a Victorian N class then by the same logic an 81
class is basically a 422 class (which is not true!).
R1004 is practically the same as an 82 class. They both have the same
model number (JT-42C)which incorporates a 12 cylinder 710 engine.
However the R1004 was based upon the EMD SD60 series while the 82s
were based upon the SD70 series.
The N class are a JT-22HC-2 which is a 12 cylinder 645 engine.
So in short R1004 is a 3000hp loco while the Victorian N class is a
2500hp (Power ratings available for traction).
Five Decades Of Clyde-GM Locomotives by Lawrie Gillies and Australian
Locomotive Rosters Volume 1 by Brad Peadon and Daven Walters are my
sources.
Hope this clears things up.
PJ
> Comalco operate this SG line and it is used for bauxite. It may also
> have carried kaolin but they shut that plant down 8 or so years ago as
> it was un profitable. i was told the kaolin mineral was under the
> bauxite.
>
> This line is not on a lot of maps, even some rail publications don't
> acknowledge the line and I have worked with ex-Comalco Weipa employees
> who didn't know it existed.
>
> Hope this helps
> Shane
>
Very hard not to know that there is a train. Granted it may not have run a
lot,
but when they ran, you could hear all over Weipa. Plus the main road used
to follow the rail line ( apparently they moved the road to the airport for
mining the area). Then the road over the river that parrallels the trailway
is popuilar for recreational pursuits, heading for locations like Dyfkin (
spelling) Point.
I know this because I lived there for 5 years with my parents, and have alot
of stuff about the railway, from diagrams and even an initial survey as to
whether a railway, ropeway, road etc.
1002 was my favourite loco.Pity it was the one sold off. Now if only another
Aus.rail contributor could show me the remains.......
As to 1003 my father who was purchasing offiecer for Comalco, told me
Comalco dod a Auatralian search for a spare shunter, and couldn't buy one,
so the Canadian one was send over.
Regards,
David Head
The railway ( circa 1983) ran always with "one engine in steam" - while
the othere was in the workshops at Lorim Point. There were usually ran as
required by the mine at Andoom ( the other end of the line).
There was usually three sets or ore wagons. One would be loading at Andoom
by automatic train jacks that move the rake while the loco was elsewhere,
another would be
unloading at Lorim Point with those same jacks. The third set was
intransit between these two points. The only signals were at the
loading/iunloading poit to indicate tot he loco driver if he could pass.
Let's say a empty train would come to Andoom. It would kreep up to the
jacks, uncouiple, move under the loader, couple to the loaded set, then
set the train back so it could pass on a loop. No turning needed.
They had no carriages at all, a flat wagon for equiment moving, some MOW
equipment, a ballast hopper. The ore wagons are bottom discharge 100ton
capacity. Many were made in Brisbane (one got on the news there when it
fell off the road transport to the port)Each set was usually around 33
wagons ( I know I saw them often enough )
There are no level crossings, and it is a big offence trying to cross the
railway, you would be thrown out of the area if your were caught.
The shunter was used for misc duties, and to stand in if a automatic jack
failed.
There were no branches, just a small one to the wharf.There was triangle,
little used
for turning the locomotives.
The line is not totally flat due to the bauxite, and if it had been mined.
There are two bridges, one 1km long with a single lane road to one side
and a smaller one across a creek. The 1km bridge does have a passing bay,
though it was normally used very little.
From where we lived you could hear the trains all night as they passed the
township..
Hope this is of interest.
Regards,
David Head
Yes, I didn't go into that much detail, but my book uses the words,
"Utilising a design that perpetuated V/line's N-class 'dog bone'
configuration, the 132-tonne 'one-off' loco..."
The N class was produced from 1985 and the 82's from 1994, so yes it
uses the 82 engine, but the body is closer to the N. So without
getting down to bolt counting its somewhere in the middle.
A better choice of words would be similar in appearence to an N class,
but with an 82 engine.
Shane
"david" <da...@nmit.vic.edu.au> wrote in message
news:3CD5F31A...@nmit.vic.edu.au...
G'day All,
I've never heard of train jacks before, can someone please explain what
they are and how they work?
Regards,
LB.
They I thing are basically long hrydraulic jacks that first grab a wagon,
push it a wagon length, realease the wagon , and then reset for the next
push, while the the train is loading/unloading. There are two at each end,
one to push then under/over the loader/unloader, and another on the other
side to clear the wagons once they have finished operations.
They are beside the wagons at about coupler height, and push the wagions
with some latch built to the side. Not sire how automatic they were, but
the loading/unloading supervisors would have had to watch them.
Was interesting to see !
Also forgot to mention several wagons have additional self contained air
compressors built onto one end for extra air.
Regards,
David Head
( Hi there Toad, EMRC now have 10 members ! )
.... also known as an Indexing Arm.
"TrainKid31" <kid_indest...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6bdaa438.02050...@posting.google.com...
Regards,
David Head
( web site comming soon)
http://www2.nmit.vic.edu.au/~david/sgal/scgal.htm
Regards,
David Head
There was an article about it in "Network" or "Track and Signal" mag - I'm
not sure which.
DW
"Shane Polle" <shane...@austmg.com> wrote in message
news:42387c27.0205...@posting.google.com...
: Peter_J_...@yahoo.com.au (Peter_J_Johnston) wrote in message