Earth Hour Wrap
Green Lantern
... but wait, Labour's lights still haven't been switched back on and won't
be for 50 years.
ROFLMAO
--
This is NOT a mandate - Rob Oakeshott
Written and authorised by G. Lantern
bringyagrogalong
(groan!) Another anti-AGW denier marching to the beat of his own drum.
In an effort to try and discredit the science of AGW, anti-AGW groups
have sent out thousands of emails asking people to leave their windows
and doors open and turn their air conditioners on to the coldest
setting to skew temperature readings around the world. LOL
Little wonder that they're seen as a joke by the educated among us.
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>Little wonder that they're seen as a joke by the educated among us.
Well, that counts you out, by definition!
LOL!
--
"One thing is sure - there will be no Gillard era. This is not a
20-year stretch. Civilised people's hands are already over their faces
every time she speaks. That cannot last. She has no power, no
influence, no friends, no learning. There's not much there."
Bob Ellis (ALP speech writer) on Dullard! http://tinyurl.com/23jklvv
"Gillard is part of a Melbourne-based gang Ellis dubs the "Mouse Pack",
which includes Simon Crean and Martin Ferguson.
"They twitch their whiskers and come out in favour of the Afghan war
without studying the problem or noting that an army intelligence
officer [independent MP Andrew Wilkie] holds the balance of power,"
Ellis says."
More Bob Ellis (ALP Speech writer) on Dullard! http://tinyurl.com/23jklvv
bringyagrogalong
> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Little wonder that they're seen as a joke by the educated among us.
>
> Well, that counts you out, by definition!
Actually it counts you out by your own drunken admission:
"Never had the opportunity of even finishing school."
http://tinyurl.com/4rdsult
"nuff said!
***************************************************************
If girls are made of sugar and spice and all things nice?
. . . why do they taste like anchovies?
***************************************************************
That’s obviously not directed at you Dud.
What would you know of such things.
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>Cock in a frock <never.had.a.woman...@loser.com> waffled:
>> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > Little wonder that they're seen as a joke by the educated among us.
>>
>> Well, that counts you out, by definition!
>
>Actually it counts you out by your own drunken admission:
Not drunk, you child fucker.
>
>"Never had the opportunity of even finishing school."
>http://tinyurl.com/4rdsult
>
Living a great life, loser wog.
Financially more than secure, no debts, travel the world First Class
when available, 5 star hotels etc etc.
Tell me loser pikey, how is it like being a wage slave with mortgage
stress?
I notice that you have consistently failed to answer this, you wog
coward.
>"nuff said!
Yep!
Game, set, match to me!
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>***************************************************************
>If girls are made of sugar and spice and all things nice?
>?. . . why do they taste like anchovies?
>?***************************************************************
You obviously go out with women with the same lack of hygiene that you
have, you smelly wog dunny cleaner.
Cheap whores from the local brothel when you cheat on your smelly
wife.
The word is that your wife has had more pricks than a porcupine!
I might have even had a freebie from her!
bringyagrogalong
> >
> > ***************************************************************
> > If girls are made of sugar and spice and all things nice
>
> You obviously go out with women with the same lack of hygiene that you
> have, you smelly wog dunny cleaner.
Nothing to do with hygiene or smell.
Anchovies are salty.
But we fully understand why a loser like you wouldn't know that.
Which is why you hastily snipped the following:
> > That’s obviously not directed at you Dud.
> >
> > What would you know of such things.
<knowing smirk>
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>Cock in a frock <never.had.a.woman...@loser.com> waffled:
>> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > ***************************************************************
>> > If girls are made of sugar and spice and all things nice
>> > . . . why do they taste like anchovies?
>> > ***************************************************************
>>
>> You obviously go out with women with the same lack of hygiene that you
>> have, you smelly wog dunny cleaner.
>
>Nothing to do with hygiene or smell.
There you go again; your lack of comprehension of what you stated
above is showing.
That's what happens when Romany is your first language.
>
>Anchovies are salty.
>
>But we fully understand why a loser like you wouldn't know that.
>
>Which is why you hastily snipped the following:
>
>> > That’s obviously not directed at you Dud.
>> >
>> > What would you know of such things.
Since you ask, I snipped this to save you embarrassment, but obviously
I know a lot more than you!
LOL!
>
><knowing smirk>
Watch the wind doesn't change!
dechucka
"Gillard = Rudd in a frock" <flatula...@deadspam.com> wrote in message
news:i64uo6lc7su5b7isj...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:24:21 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong
> <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>
>>Cock in a frock <never.had.a.woman...@loser.com> waffled:
>>> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Little wonder that they're seen as a joke by the educated among us.
>>>
>>> Well, that counts you out, by definition!
>>
>>Actually it counts you out by your own drunken admission:
>
> Not drunk, you child fucker.
>>
>>"Never had the opportunity of even finishing school."
>>http://tinyurl.com/4rdsult
>>
>
> Living a great life, loser wog.
>
> Financially more than secure, no debts, travel the world First Class
> when available, 5 star hotels etc etc.
Sad how you define your life. Sad that to get that "life" ( which in my
experience is not all that it's cracked up to be having been there done
that ) you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that you
don't believe in.
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
wrote:
>> Financially more than secure, no debts, travel the world First Class
>> when available, 5 star hotels etc etc.
>
>Sad how you define your life. Sad that to get that "life" ( which in my
>experience is not all that it's cracked up to be having been there done
>that ) you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that you
>don't believe in.
Gee, you have such insight!
Now please tell me; what industry is that?
dechucka
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:51:26 +1100, "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> Financially more than secure, no debts, travel the world First Class
>>> when available, 5 star hotels etc etc.
>>
>>Sad how you define your life. Sad that to get that "life" ( which in my
>>experience is not all that it's cracked up to be having been there done
>>that ) you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that you
>>don't believe in.
>
> Gee, you have such insight!
Not really a great insight it is so obvious
>
> Now please tell me; what industry is that?
ETS or so you claimed
bringyagrogalong
> "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Financially more than secure, no debts, travel the world First Class
> >> when available, 5 star hotels etc etc.
>
> > Sad how you define your life. Sad that to get that "life" ( which in my
> > experience is not all that it's cracked up to be having been there done
> > that ) you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that you
> > don't believe in.
>
> Gee, you have such insight!
>
> Now please tell me; what industry is that?
You have to make allowances for dechucka.
He's confused you with Gillard Lies. ROTFL
dechucka
"bringyagrogalong" <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote in message
news:f784263d-ddba-4bb5...@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com...
===================================
Sorry I did
bringyagrogalong
> > "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> Financially more than secure, no debts, travel the world First Class
> > >> when available, 5 star hotels etc etc.
>
> > > Sad how you define your life. Sad that to get that "life" ( which in my
> > > experience is not all that it's cracked up to be having been there done
> > > that ) you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that
> > > you don't believe in.
>
> > Gee, you have such insight!
>
> > Now please tell me; what industry is that?
>
> You have to make allowances for dechucka.
>
> He's confused you with Gillard Lies. ROTFL
>
> ===================================
>
> Sorry I did
Apology accepted, but one can readily see why the mistake was made.
They are almost impossible to tell apart.
Dud's on record for saying this:
"Never had the opportunity of even finishing school."
http://tinyurl.com/4rdsult
Which explains why you thought he was Oily.
And Oily is on record for dropping these clangers:
a) the Germans won the battle of Moscow.
b) the Czech Republic is not a member of the EU
c) the earth is the centre of the Universe
d) the sun's core is made of rock.
e) the laws stoning women for adultery should be respected.
f) the Universe is infinite
g) 24.998377% is closer to 26% than it is to 25%
So as I say, it was really a mistake that anybody could have made so
don't feel like a goose.
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
dechucka
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:04:19 +1100, "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Gillard = Rudd in a frock" <flatula...@deadspam.com> wrote in message
>>news:hdh0p6d59te6n4q13...@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:51:26 +1100, "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Financially more than secure, no debts, travel the world First Class
>>>>> when available, 5 star hotels etc etc.
>>>>
>>>>Sad how you define your life. Sad that to get that "life" ( which in my
>>>>experience is not all that it's cracked up to be having been there done
>>>>that ) you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that
>>>>you
>>>>don't believe in.
>>>
>>> Gee, you have such insight!
>>
>>Not really a great insight it is so obvious
>>>
>>> Now please tell me; what industry is that?
>>
>>ETS or so you claimed
Wrong Gillard but boy do you post similarily
Seon
"Green Lantern" <gr...@peril.com> wrote in message
news:m0wjp.14153$MF5....@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
> Wasn't that a great earth hour ?
>
> ... but wait, Labour's lights still haven't been switched back on and
> won't be for 50 years.
>
Yep NSW kicked out an incompetent government. They won't go back on until at
least the next generation grows up and forgets how terrible Labor were.
This generation learned it's lesson the hard way.
Seon
"bringyagrogalong" <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote in message
news:4069da91-2afc-48fa...@g3g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
"I, on the other hand, am a fully rounded human being with a degree from the
university of life, a diploma from the school of hard knocks, and three gold
stars from the kindergarten of getting the shit kicked out of me. "
Blackadder, Blackadder goes fourth
HD
"Seon" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:JaudnbWzo8eSVAvQ...@westnet.com.au...
They will be back soon when people find out that the Liberals arec worse.
Seon
"HD" <her...@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:lZAlp.279$aH5...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
I hope you're wrong. I hope the liberals do make NSW better and make housing
prices cheaper and improve transport in Sydney. I had to walk 2 hours to get
a taxi one Saturday night in Sydney and the busses only let people with pre
bought tickets on.
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
How soon HD?
HD
When the Liberals increased immigration NSW like all other states could not
keep up with roads, public transport, health and everything else.
It is the same no matter who is in Government.
HD
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:18:21 +1000, "HD" <her...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Seon" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:JaudnbWzo8eSVAvQ...@westnet.com.au...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Green Lantern" <gr...@peril.com> wrote in message
>>> news:m0wjp.14153$MF5....@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>> Wasn't that a great earth hour ?
>>>>
>>>> ... but wait, Labour's lights still haven't been switched back on and
>>>> won't be for 50 years.
>>>>
>>> Yep NSW kicked out an incompetent government. They won't go back on
>>> until
>>> at least the next generation grows up and forgets how terrible Labor
>>> were.
>>> This generation learned it's lesson the hard way.
>>
>>
>>They will be back soon when people find out that the Liberals arec worse.
>
> How soon HD?
I give them 2 terms.
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
Eight years. Plenty of time to fix the shit left over by the self
indulgent ALP and get re-elected for another two terms.
HD
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:48:35 +1000, "HD" <her...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Gillard = Rudd in a frock" <flatula...@deadspam.com> wrote in message
>>news:a0odp61d8figtfahc...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:18:21 +1000, "HD" <her...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Seon" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:JaudnbWzo8eSVAvQ...@westnet.com.au...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Green Lantern" <gr...@peril.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:m0wjp.14153$MF5....@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>>>> Wasn't that a great earth hour ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... but wait, Labour's lights still haven't been switched back on and
>>>>>> won't be for 50 years.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yep NSW kicked out an incompetent government. They won't go back on
>>>>> until
>>>>> at least the next generation grows up and forgets how terrible Labor
>>>>> were.
>>>>> This generation learned it's lesson the hard way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>They will be back soon when people find out that the Liberals arec
>>>>worse.
>>>
>>> How soon HD?
>>
>>I give them 2 terms.
>
> Eight years. Plenty of time to fix the shit left over by the self
> indulgent ALP and get re-elected for another two terms.
Not if Abbott get elected.
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
He will.
Perhaps you will go back to your Nazi mates in Germany then?
Good riddance!
LOL!
HD
There we go again with nonsensical, childish and stupid comments.
bringyagrogalong
> > "Gillard = Rudd in a frock" <flatulantdi...@deadspam.com> wrote in message.
> >> "HD" <her...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> >>> "Gillard = Rudd in a frock" <flatulantdi...@deadspam.com> wrote in message
>
> >>>>>>> ... but wait, Labour's lights still haven't been switched back on and
> >>>>>>> won't be for 50 years.
>
> >>>>>> Yep NSW kicked out an incompetent government. They won't go back on
> >>>>>> until at least the next generation grows up and forgets how terrible Labor
> >>>>>> were. This generation learned it's lesson the hard way.
>
> >>>>> They will be back soon when people find out that the Liberals arec
> >>>>> worse.
>
> >>>> How soon HD?
>
> >>> I give them 2 terms.
>
> >> Eight years. Plenty of time to fix the shit left over by the self
> >> indulgent ALP and get re-elected for another two terms.
>
> > Not if Abbott get elected.
>
> He will.
>
> Perhaps you will go back to your Nazi mates in Germany then?
But you admitted that your grandfather worked for the Germans prior to
WW2 .
Care to deny it?
Incidentally, with German blood cursing through your veins, do you
feel embarrassed by the genocide your forefathers committed?
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
<sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>>
>> He will.
>>
>> Perhaps you will go back to your Nazi mates in Germany then?
>
>But you admitted that your grandfather worked for the Germans prior to
>WW2 .
>
>Care to deny it?
Absolutely; again you fail to understand English.
I said he was a German, not that he worked for the Germans.
Care to deny it?
>
>Incidentally, with German blood cursing through your veins, do you
>feel embarrassed by the genocide your forefathers committed?
My grandfather left Germany to escape the Nazis, you blithering child.
Again points to your lack of simple comprehension of the English
language - but what can we expect from a blow in who has Romany as his
first language?
<sigh>
Why do we let Gypsy wogs such as you into Australia?
Seon
"HD" <her...@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:MmBlp.314$CS3...@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
I'm willing to give them a benefit of the doubt.
Oy rool out a carbon tax
>
> "Gillard = Rudd in a frock" <flatula...@deadspam.com> wrote in
> message news:i64uo6lc7su5b7isj...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:24:21 -0700 (PDT), bringyagrogalong
>> <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Cock in a frock <never.had.a.woman...@loser.com> waffled:
>>>> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Little wonder that they're seen as a joke by the educated among us.
>>>>
>>>> Well, that counts you out, by definition!
>>>
>>> Actually it counts you out by your own drunken admission:
>>
>> Not drunk, you child fucker.
>>>
>>> "Never had the opportunity of even finishing school."
>>> http://tinyurl.com/4rdsult
>>>
>>
>> Living a great life, loser wog.
>>
>> Financially more than secure, no debts, travel the world First Class
>> when available, 5 star hotels etc etc.
I'm told you were suffering from one of your "pharmaceutical moments"
when you directed this comment to the wrong poster. Dunno what sort of
reply was expected though, but I'll give it a shot.
>
> Sad how you define your life.
Sad that you think you actually know how I define my life.
> Sad that to get that "life" ( which in my
> experience is not all that it's cracked up to be having been there done
> that )
Yeah, right.
> you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that
> you don't believe in.
What stroke of genius enabled you to come to this (erroneous)
conclusion? I am a great believer in what I do and manage to provide
results which the industry is very happy with. I am also fortunate
enough to be in a position to be able to contribute to many of the goals
to which I have aspired since uni days. One of my best "life" moments
was to see this crazy dream I had in engineering thermodynamics, of a
solar-heated system pumping water, actually come true. No power supply
other than the heat of the sun, no emissions, no maintenance, just
nature's own heat engine silently working away. Next personal project is
to modify the same technology to produce potable drinking water from the
pumped supply! But BIG R&D required there. Fortunately the diversity of
available grants etc. in the EU will enable this. So what better
"definition" of life could one want? I can combine my accumulated
scientific and engineering expertise to develop solutions to _real_
existing problems, in a way which utilizes renewable energy, is
environmentally clean, efficient (often zero running costs and
maintenance-free), independent of fossil fuel supply, produces no _real_
pollution (no plant food either!) and actually does help to improve the
planet. Win-win-win as I see it.
As a bonus, I am able to provide a subliminal and sage guiding hand, to
help ensure that large amounts of money are not squandered and wasted on
futile attempts to solve non-existent problems. In our submissions, I
can supplement our valid calculations of reduced/ zero CO2 emissions
with handy quotes from lunatic alarmists, citing "the greatest moral
challenge of our time", "we can't afford to wait another month" and "the
science is settled, the debate is over". Hell, I might even use
bringnobrain's "not one single scientist on the face of the Earth
disagrees with ..." ... or whatever the bullshit he made up was. (LOL -
just joking, we don't want to appear as lunatic nutcases!) What could be
more satisfying in life than keeping everybody happy - working hard,
playing hard, travel, good money and the ability to manage one's own
finances even in the face of hopeless financial management from a shonky
guvmint on the home front? I've always liked the line "you can't always
get what you want, but you might just get what you need". I like to
think that I help to make that come true.
Back in Aus, I am able to proceed with R&D on existing and new projects,
with company colleagues from all over the world, all with existing
broadband capabilities. In short, I believe strongly that the industry
I've chosen to adopt in recent years provides a wonderful opportunity
for real improvements on many fronts, and I am as happy to be a
contributor as I am in being able to lend a guiding hand and steer its
commendable efforts in the right directions. Life's good.
What's your "good life" definition BTW?
--
"If we cut emissions today, global temperatures are not likely to drop
for about a thousand years. "
-- Tim (it ain't a gonna rain no more) Flannery
- Australian Climate Commissar
bringyagrogalong
> dechucka wrote:
>
> > you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that
> > you don't believe in.
>
(Self absorbed rant mercifully snipped as a service to usenet)
> "If we cut emissions today, global temperatures are not likely to drop
> for about a thousand years. "
> -- Tim Flannery
"The aim of climate action today is not to return to a cooler world of
yesterday. The urgent aim is to stop the runaway speed of carbon
emission growth - and global temperatures".
- Graham Lloyd
And as Tim Flannery explained: "It highlights the importance of
avoiding every kilogram of greenhouse gas emissions we can, for once
in the atmosphere they are extremely difficult to get out, and have
long term consequences.
Oy rool out a carbon tax
> Oy rool out a carbon tax <gillard_l...@promises.are.invalid> wrote:
>> dechucka wrote:
>>
>>> you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that
>>> you don't believe in.
>> Preen,preen,preen,preen,bullshit,preen.
>
> (Self absorbed rant mercifully snipped as a service to usenet)
The envy of the peasant class shining through I see. <disdainful smirk>
>> "If we cut emissions today, global temperatures are not likely to drop
>> for about a thousand years. "
>> -- Tim Flannery
>
> "The aim of climate action today is not to return to a cooler world of
> yesterday. The urgent aim is to stop the runaway speed of carbon
> emission growth - and global temperatures".
> - Graham Lloyd
Graham Loyd - unqualified hack journalist for leftwing rag... "not a
climate "scientist" "... not even a journo's arsehole LOL!
>
> And as Tim Flannery explained: "It highlights the importance of
> avoiding every kilogram of greenhouse gas emissions we can, for once
> in the atmosphere they are extremely difficult to get out, and have
> long term consequences.
Unqualified non-climate scientist Fraudery, failed doomsday seer,
attempts to cover his incredibly damaging revelation of hitherto covert
fact with a layer of pure unsubstantiated bullshit, of the same caliber
as that fellow-parasite Loyd. What a wank - right up your alley!
Worth repeating:
--
"If we cut emissions today, global temperatures are not likely to drop
for about a thousand years. "
bringyagrogalong
> >
> > "The aim of climate action today is not to return to a cooler world of
> > yesterday. The urgent aim is to stop the runaway speed of carbon
> > emission growth - and global temperatures".
> > - Graham Lloyd
>
> Graham Loyd - unqualified hack journalist for leftwing rag.
Fair dinkum! Just how much of a galah is Oily. LOL
He reckons The Australian is a left-wing rag.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
It's right up there with his claim the the Germans won the Battle of
Moscow. <chortle>
Yet another addition to his list of clangers...
1) the Germans won the battle of Moscow.
2) the Czech Republic is not a member of the EU
3) the earth is the centre of the Universe
4) the sun's core is made of rock.
5) the laws stoning women for adultery should be respected.
6) the Universe is infinite
7) 24.998377% is closer to 26% than it is to 25%
8) The Australian is a left-wing rag
Christ! Such is the extent of Oily's stupidity that this bloody list
is starting to become unmanageable.
Oy rool out a carbon tax
> Oy rool out a carbon tax <gillard_l...@promises.are.invalid> wrote:
>> bringyagrogalong wrote:
>>> "The aim of climate action today is not to return to a cooler world of
>>> yesterday. The urgent aim is to stop the runaway speed of carbon
>>> emission growth - and global temperatures".
>>> - Graham Lloyd
>> Graham Loyd - unqualified hack journalist for leftwing rag.
>
Show us your maths prowess again. Show us how the data below
State | Population | Welfare Recipients
NSW| 7134421 | 1401667
WA | 2245057 | 350394
yeilds a NSW welfare rate "actually 24.998377%" higher than the WA rate,
as opposed to the orthodox and correct calculated result of 25.88%. Show
us all how ya dun it Gomer. ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!
Bears repeating:
bringyagrogalong
> bringyagrogalong wrote:
> > Oy rool out a carbon tax <gillard_l...@promises.are.invalid> wrote:
> >> bringyagrogalong wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "The aim of climate action today is not to return to a cooler world of
> >>> yesterday. The urgent aim is to stop the runaway speed of carbon
> >>> emission growth - and global temperatures".
> >>> - Graham Lloyd
> >>
> >> Graham Loyd - unqualified hack journalist for leftwing rag.
>
> > He reckons The Australian is a left-wing rag.
>
> Yep.
Oh dear, so Rupert's an old Lefty is he? LOL
> Show us your maths prowess again. Show us how the data below
> State | Population | Welfare Recipients
> NSW| 7134421 | 1401667
> WA | 2245057 | 350394
>
> yeilds a NSW welfare rate "actually 24.998377%" higher than the WA rate,
> as opposed to the orthodox and correct calculated result of 25.88%. Show
> us all how ya dun it Gomer. ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!
The first thing one needs to do when solving a mathematical problem is
to get rid of the muzack.
You know, when a whole lot of irrelevant rubbish is included in the
problem to confuse, like it has successfully done in your case.
In this case the mathematical muzack is the population figures for NSW
and WA which are totally irrelevant to the question posed.
ie. How many more welfare recipients does NSW have compared to WA,
expressed as a percentage?
Welfare recipients in NSW 1,401,667
Welfare recipients in WA 350,394
350394/1401667=.24998377=24.998377%
Which is tad shy of 25% and not closer to 26% as that lunatic Oily
reckons. LOL
> Bears repeating:
That's if one can bear you stupidity. :-}
Gillard = Rudd in a frock
<gillar...@promises.are.invalid> wrote:
>bringyagrogalong wrote:
>> Oy rool out a carbon tax <gillard_l...@promises.are.invalid> wrote:
>>> dechucka wrote:
>>>
>>>> you prostitute yourself by making money out of an industry that
>>>> you don't believe in.
>>> Preen,preen,preen,preen,bullshit,preen.
>>
>> (Self absorbed rant mercifully snipped as a service to usenet)
>
>The envy of the peasant class shining through I see. <disdainful smirk>
What else can we expect from the losing Gypsy wog?
He should change his nym to "bringnobrainalong"!
He bags others for alleged errors in calculations, etc., but the
cretin uses Google Groups to post (obviously hasn't the skills to
handle a NNTP client); and furthermore he doesn't even know how to fix
his sig. delimiter!
What a losing wog child he is!
LOL!
Oy rool out a carbon tax
> Oy rool out a carbon tax <gillard_l...@promises.are.invalid> wrote:
>> bringyagrogalong wrote:
>>> Oy rool out a carbon tax <gillard_l...@promises.are.invalid> wrote:
>>>> bringyagrogalong wrote:
>>>>> "The aim of climate action today is not to return to a cooler world of
>>>>> yesterday. The urgent aim is to stop the runaway speed of carbon
>>>>> emission growth - and global temperatures".
>>>>> - Graham Lloyd
>>>> Graham Loyd - unqualified hack journalist for leftwing rag.
>>> He reckons The Australian is a left-wing rag.
>> Yep.
>
> Oh dear, so Rupert's an old Lefty is he? LOL
I should have restricted the comment to Loyd. There are a couple of sane
journos who write for the Australian, but Loyd ain't one of them.
>> Show us your maths prowess again. Show us how the data below
>> State | Population | Welfare Recipients
>> NSW| 7134421 | 1401667
>> WA | 2245057 | 350394
>>
>> yeilds a NSW welfare rate "actually 24.998377%" higher than the WA rate,
>> as opposed to the orthodox and correct calculated result of 25.88%. Show
>> us all how ya dun it Gomer. ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!
>
> The first thing one needs to do when solving a mathematical problem is
> to get rid of the muzack.
Strike 1. The first thing you need is to be able to translate the
written word into the correct variables and equations, which you have
failed to do. It's what we call literacy and comprehension, which you
have also demonstrated you are a total failure at.
> You know, when a whole lot of irrelevant rubbish is included in the
> problem to confuse, like it has successfully done in your case.
Strike 2. I interpreted the worded problem correctly. You failed, owing
to your absence of a comprehension capability.
> In this case the mathematical muzack is the population figures for NSW
> and WA which are totally irrelevant to the question posed.
Strike 3. Let's look at the original statement again:
<2f96b2ae-109c-4ae7...@y31g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
"NSW, the "welfare" state, has a 25% higher _rate_ of welfare recipients
than WA. 25%!"
Note the all important word _rate_ !!!!!!!! The only _rate_ of relevance
is the "per head of population" rate. And let's take a wild guess at
what's needed to calculate that. Yep, it's the number of welfare
recipients and the ... wait for it ... population!
> ie. How many more welfare recipients does NSW have compared to WA,
> expressed as a percentage?
Strike ... well, you're out anyway. This is a completely incorrect
rephrasing of the statement. Lack of basic English comprehension skills
blatantly evident.
The correct rephrasing is:
The welfare recipient _rate_ in NSW is how much higher than the welfare
recipient _rate_ in WA.
> Welfare recipients in NSW 1,401,667
>
> Welfare recipients in WA 350,394
>
> 350394/1401667=.24998377=24.998377%
What you have done here in your stupidity is exactly what you accused
Jason of doing when he pointed out your error:
<34c8d6c0-fe8a-4c72...@l14g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
"So to anyone who isn't retarded NSW has a 4.039% higher rate of Welfare
recipients.
*Your confusing a higher number with a higher rate.*
Look up the difference, I'll wait."
ROTFL! You have not used rates at all in your pitiful attempt above, but
have compared *numbers* (NOT rates) as a ratio. No wonder the poor
bloody chimps in the cage couldn't reproduce the result!
The calculation you present is the solution to:
What is the ratio of the _number_ of welfare recipients in WA to the
_number_ of welfare recipients in NSW. Nothing to do with _rates_ !!!
> Which is tad shy of 25% and not closer to 26% as that lunatic Oily
> reckons. LOL
That would be all well and good if that was what Jason was stating, but
it is nothing like it.
The correct answer, as any primary school kid would know, is arrived at
by firstly calculating the welfare recipient _rates_ expressed as
welfare recipients per head of population:
NSW = 1401667/ 7134421 = 0.19646541744592868853688337147471
WA = 350394/ 2245057 = 0.15607354289891080716436152846008
How much higher is the NSW rate than the WA rate?
0.19646541744592868853688337147471 - 0.15607354289891080716436152846008
= 0.040391874547017881372521843013921
(This is where your initial blunder of 4% came from BTW... in case you
were confused. LOL)
By what percentage is the NSW _rate_ higher than the WA _rate_ ?
(NSW - WA)/WA * 100
= 0.040391874547017881372521843013921/
0.15607354289891080716436152846008 * 100
= 25.880026682792605952313615904196 %
which is closer to 26% than 25%. ROTFL
Although you have been splattered by me, yet again, it has been
enlightening to the group for you to demonstrate just how badly the
special needs education system has failed you. Indeed, your numeracy
might not be that bad at all, but your level of reading comprehension is
just appalling. This is a very serious issue, when our "special" people
are so ill-prepared to be released into the wider community, without
even the simple skills instilled in primary school, mastered by even the
slow ones.
Were it not for your totally misplaced (as demonstrated) arrogance, you
would surely be an object of pity. Closing with your very own words:
<3be3b18b-3fc2-4938...@k10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
"I take it maths isn't one of your strong points. LOL"