Mohammed -- The Root Of Evil
B'razeer Boobar
your name? He has inspired the men into unbelievable misogyny and
your daughters into self-loathing. His words have commanded the
faithful to convert non-believers through global terrorism. He
controls the very thought processes of your people and compels them to
believe falsely that their destruction via terrorism is the path to
paradise. Awaken O Allah and see what he has wrought. Banish him
forever into damnation so that your people might be free and exist in
peace!!
Topaz
There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment".
It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are
from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So
What?":
"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most
influential production executives at each of the major movie studios
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt
Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic
attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most
powerful positions."
The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner.
On studios that were bought out by the Japanese the magazine says:
"When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to
undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and
all Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and
Tom Pollack."
Here are some quotes from the paper "Jews Control the Media
and Rule America"
It may be rather out of date but it still explains why things are the
way they are.
"American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Columbia Broadcasting
System (CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Each of these
three has been under the absolute control of a single man over a long
enough period of time--ranging from 32 to 55 years--for him to staff
the corporation at every level with officers of his choosing and then
to place his imprint indelibly upon it. In each case that man has been
a Jew.
"Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities
Communications, Inc...the chairman of the board of directors and chief
executive officer (CEO) of the network was Leonard Harry Goldenson, a
Jew...In an interview in the April 1, 1985 issue of Newsweek,
Goldenson boasted 'I built this company (ABC) from scratch.'"
"CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than
half a century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia..."
"There has been no move by top G-E management to change the
Jewish "profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personnel. To the
contrary, new Jewish executives have been added: an example is Steve
Friedman..."
"The man in charge of the television entertainment division at
CBS is Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two
men....nearly all of the men who shape young Amercians' concept of
reality, of good and evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior
are Jews. In particular, Sagansky and Bloomberg are Jews. So is
Tartikoff. Littlefield is the only Gentile who has had a significant
role in TV entertainment programming in recent years."
"American Film magazine listed the top 10...entertainment
companies and their CEOs...Time Warner Communications (Steven J Ross,
Jew) Walt Disney Co. (Michael D. Eisner, Jew)...Of the 10 top
entertainment CEOs listed above, eight are Jews."
"The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than a
lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also
illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of
opinion... The Newhouse's own 31 daily newspapers, including several
large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the
Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's
largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all
its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television
broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the
countries largest cable networks- the Sunday supplement Parade, with a
circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen
major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle,
Glamour, Vanity Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self,
Home&Garden...."
"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership
and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."
"the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington
Post. These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidelines
for nearly all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and
what isn't, at national and international levels. They originate the
news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in
Jewish hands...The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York
Times Co. 36 other newspapers; twelve magazines, including McCall's
and Family Circle..."
"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the
Daily News. The New York Post is owned by billionaire Jewish
real-estate developer Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal
property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of..."
"There are only three newsmagazines of any note published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report....The CEO
of Time Warner Communications is Steven J. Ross, and he is a Jew.
"Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington
Post Co., under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham..."
"U.S. News & World Report... owned and published by Jewish real
estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman..."
" The three largest book publishers...Random House... Simon &
Schuster , and Time Inc. Book Co....All three are owned or controlled
by Jews...The CEO of Simon & Schuster if Richard Snyder, and the
president is Jeremy Kaplan; both are Jews too."
"Western Publishing...ranks first among publishers of children's
books, with more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO
is Richard Bernstein, a Jew."
"Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted
Turner isn't a Jew!" they will announce..."
"We are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence
on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also
are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children..."
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
B'razeer Boobar
wrote:
>
> There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
>Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
>Hollywood.
Liberal Jews are responsible for much of the domestic ills in the US.
But Muslims create global terror.
You will be eliminated; just a matter of time, Abdulla.
Doug
criticism? How is that supposed to be a defense? I believe
the term for this is argument by red herring (or in South Park
parlance, the Chewbacca defense).
"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:j07do3t9ovc5t0v0l...@4ax.com...
Little Johnny Howard
> Topaz's only response to criticism of Pislam is jewish
> criticism? How is that supposed to be a defense? I believe
> the term for this is argument by red herring (or in South Park
> parlance, the Chewbacca defense).
Turdputz is a typical raghead - not very bright.
Doug
If they knew, they would be STUNNED that our leaders would lie so boldly to
us, including Mr. Kantor, to protect ECHELON.
That the public would misunderstand Kantor and Clinton to think they are
offering a "reasonable compromise"...even though what is actually happening
is our government demanding you lose all right to privacy, that we must give
the government a copy of our personal security key.
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
Part 6: Louis Freeh & The Creeping Police State
---- - ----- ----- --- -------- ------ -----
o Louis Freeh
o National ID Card
o Worldwide Banking and Phone Monitoring
o Cybernetic Control of Society
o Conclusions
******************************************************************************
Louis Freeh
----- -----
Louis Freeh is accomplishing something that real
terrorists themselves could never have accomplished.
Destruction of the American Way of Life.
Freedom, Liberty.
It is as if freedom terrorists were in charge of our government.
* "The End of Ordinary Money, Part I", by J. Orlin Grabbe
* http://www.aci.net/kalliste
*
* The GSA opposed CALEA [FBI code name: "Operation Root Canal"], stating
* "the proposed bill would have to have the FCC or other agency approve or
* reject equipment mainly on the basis of whether the FBI had the capacity
* to
Topaz
> full-time to the business. Yeah!
>
> F*** that would be awesome (pardon my language).
Remember the person the FBI was investigating for theft of Risk Management
source code? His manager told him and all the other employees in their
group that their email was being monitored. The manager told both me, Salomon
Legal, and the U.S. Attorney and the two FBI agents this.
Go figure.
I call this Internet-is-irresistible siren call: "Internet Fever".
When it comes to ECHELON, it was never discussed with the American people.
We never had a chance to vote on it.
It was done in secret.
It is done in secret.
When you lift up the phone, you don't hear a message warning you
that the NSA is monitoring it.
But they are.
"Anytime, anywhere" is their motto.
*****************************************************************************
On Being Monitored
-- ----- ---------
On being black.
African-Americans are a heavily monitored group.
* "Above the Law", by David Burnham, ISBN 0-684-80699-1, 1996
*
* Even while Lyndon Johnson fought for far-reaching civil rights
* legislation and spoke out against racism and government eavesdropping,
* the Johnson White House created a special squad of FBI agents to place
* wiretaps and bugs on most of the African Americans who came to Atlantic
* City during the 1964 Democratic convention.
----
A while back, I saw a black ex-police officer take a camera with him in
a car in LA at night. This was somewhere around the time of the Rodney
King beating. I was watching C-SPAN. Some sort of police officers
association meeting...
It was amazing how often he was pulled over, and the cheesy reasons the
officers gave.
"Your tail ligh
Doug
of course his posting host is different.
"Doug" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:naibo.132...@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
Topaz
Tiptoeing around Our Problems
By Dr. William Pierce
"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
East recently, just because so much is happening there, and
undoubtedly we'll be talking about it much more in the future. For
that reason I want to make very clear what my motives and sympathies
are, lest I lead anyone astray and be thought a hypocrite for doing
so. First, regarding Palestine: although my sympathies definitely lie
with the Palestinians rather than with the Jews, it is not horror at
what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians that motivates me. What
motivates me is horror that my country is being used by the Jews in
their war against the Palestinians. If America were not involved at
all in the Middle East I still would sympathize with the Palestinians
and I would wish that they could be successful in driving the Jews
into the sea and annihilating the abomination that is Israel, but that
conflict between Jews and Palestinians would not be a major concern
for me. At least, my
concern there would be dwarfed by my concern for problems more
directly involving my own people in America and in Europe and in
southern Africa.
Even now, with money and weapons being supplied by America and used to
slaughter Palestinians, my concern is much less with monsters like
Ariel Sharon who are doing the slaughtering than it is with the filthy
creatures among my own people in America who are collaborating with
Jews here to keep the weapons and money flowing to Sharon -- and are
ready to do whatever else the Jews require of them here or abroad.
So when I tell you about Jews in occupied Palestine shooting
Palestinian children, and disapproval and anger are evident in my
voice, what I really am angry about is that the American people, my
people, are being used for this murderous activity. I am angry that
America's whole foreign policy has been perverted to serve Jewish
interests at the expense of American interests. I am angry that
America's political system has been perverted to ensure that we always
have so-called "leaders," whether Democrat or Republican, who are
dependent on the Jewish media or Jewish money or both for their
election and consequently will do the bidding of the Jews. I am angry
that our whole government is riddled with Jews -- Jews in our Defense
Department, Jews in our State
Department, Jews in our Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jews
in our Justice Department, Jews in the President's speech-writing
staff - who really set the policies of our government behind the
scenes, while the politicians are out front in the spotlight making
speeches and kissing babies - and doing as they're told by the Jews
behind the
scenes.
Did you know that it was a Jewish speechwriter, David Frum, who put
the phrase "axis of evil" in George Bush's mouth to justify America's
ongoing war against Israel's enemies? Did you know that a clique of
Jews in the Defense Department and among George Bush's foreign policy
advisers are the people actually running the so-called "war on terror"
in Afghanistan: a war that they intend to expand to Iraq and any other
Middle Eastern country that gets uppity, in order to make that part of
the world safe for Israel at American expense? Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld is a front man for his nominal subordinates, Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense for Policy Douglas Feith; and George Bush's official foreign
policy adviser, Condoleezza Rice, helps him meet his Black quota for
the Cabinet, but it is the Jew Richard Perle, chairman of Bush's
Defense Policy Board, who gives him his foreign policy directives.
As I've said on more than one occasion, George Bush is a feckless
nincompoop who couldn't come up with a defense policy or a foreign
policy on his own if he had to -- which is why he's President. The
real policymakers behind the scenes certainly don't want a man in the
White House who has ideas of his own, because those ideas might
conflict with theirs.
And it is nothing but empty sophistry to make a distinction between
Jews in Israel, such as Ariel Sharon and Simon Peres, and the Jews in
Mr. Bush's administration formulating his policies or the Jews
controlling our mass media. They all are Jews, and that's what really
matters.
There are many knowledgeable Americans besides me who think that it's
not a good thing to have Jews using America to advance Israel's
interests at the expense of America's interests. They know how the
system works: how the Jews exert their control through money and media
and a well-entrenched network of Jewish operatives, such as Wolfowitz
and Feith and Perle. And many of these knowledgeable Americans also
understand how Jewish subterfuge and deceit work: they understand that
the Jews throw up a lot of smoke to conceal their control and make it
appear that they have much less influence than they actually do.
Despite this degree of understanding that many knowledgeable Americans
have, there seem to be very few who are willing or able to draw the
necessary conclusions. What I keep seeing are comments about the need
to get the so-called "peace process" going again in the Middle East,
and how there are hardline supporters of Israel who are obstructing
the "peace process" because they think that it will give too much to
the Palestinians or will compromise Israel's security, or whatever.
These knowledgeable Americans seem to believe that if we could just
get around the Jewish hardliners somehow -- if we could just
neutralize Jews such as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle; if Ariel Sharon
could be replaced by a "moderate" Jewish prime minister -- then the
"peace process" could proceed, America could gradually reduce its
involvement in helping the Jews keep the Palestinians repressed, and
eventually Israel no longer would be using America, and everything
would be rosy. And so these knowledgeable Americans expend all of
their wit and energy in these trivial pursuits.
Listen! Do you know what the most hopeful aspect of the conflict
between Jews and Palestinians is now? It is the ongoing radicalization
of the Muslim masses throughout the whole Middle East. The
collaborator governments in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Saudi Arabia are
terrified of the reaction they see among their own people to what
Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinians. When Sharon's Jewish troops
shoot Palestinian children, Muslim mobs riot, and governments that now
collaborate with the United States quake. Ariel Sharon is the best
thing that has happened in the Middle East in the last 54 years.
The Palestinian tactic of suicide bombing is being denounced by every
politician and every media spokesman over here now. It's nothing but
terrorism, they all say. There's no justification at all for suicide
bombing, they tell us. Of course, whenever you hear that sort of
unanimity from the politicians and the media people you should be
suspicious. In fact, suicide bombing is the best tactic for the
Palestinians to use now, because it provokes the Jews to step up
reprisals. And the reprisals radicalize the masses in every country in
the Middle East. If just one of the collaborator governments falls,
the spines of all the rest will be stiffened, and the Bush government
will be far less likely to find collaborators for building its
so-called "coalition" to do the will of the Jews in the Middle East.
Suicide bombers now hardly put a dent in the population of five
million Jews in occupied Palestine, and Sharon's bloody reprisals
hardly put a dent in the overall Palestinian population. But if
conflict of this sort continues until just one collaborator government
is overthrown, that ultimately will be worth more than ten thousand
successful suicide
bombings in which only 20 or so Jews are killed each time. In the long
run there can be no real peace in the Middle East and no end to
America's shameful role there -- and no future for the Palestinian
people -- as long as there is an Israel. There seems to be a better
understanding of these things among knowledgeable Palestinians than
among knowledgeable Americans.
Shallow thinking and the pursuit of trivial goals is even worse among
knowledgeable Americans when it comes to domestic problems. They
really do not want to grasp these problems with both hands and deal
with them in a forthright way. Look, for example, at what uncontrolled
immigration has done and is doing to America. And what do
knowledgeable Americans propose to do about that? Very little, really.
They make much of the fact that several of the al-Qaeda hijackers who
carried out the September 11 attack were in the United States only
because of very lax immigration policies, and so that's a good reason
for tightening up the policies.
How about simply rounding up all illegal aliens immediately -- all 12
million of them -- and booting them and all of their offspring out of
the country without further ado?
Oh, no, no, no! We can't do that! Why not? Well, the media never would
stand for it. The media would be all over anyone who even proposed a
mass expulsion of illegal aliens. They would denounce any political
leader who tried to do that as a "racist" and a "neo-Nazi." And so
knowledgeable Americans, who understand the immigration disaster quite
well, continue tiptoeing around it, afraid to do or even say anything
really significant about it: terrified even to think about really
radical solutions that might actually end the problem. And it's the
same with the rest of our domestic problems. Lots of people understand
these problems and are worried about them, but they won't tackle them
in any
significant way. They let the Jews -- the Jewish media and Jewish
money and the entrenched Jewish network -- have their way, for all
practical purposes.
Why? Why are the Jews permitted to get away with all of their
destructive policies and activities without being challenged or
opposed in any significant way? Part of the reason is that the Jews
are very powerful, and therefore many people are afraid to cross them.
They're afraid of the sort of media reaction I just mentioned in
connection with immigration. Everyone understands that the Jews stick
together and will viciously attack anyone who opposes them. It's the
old story, so aptly expressed by the late-16th-century writer, Sir
John Harington. Harington wrote: "Treason doth never prosper: what's
the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Today the
Jewish power structure is
prospering, and none dare oppose it or even call it what it is. Well,
that's only part of the reason Jews are permitted to get away with so
much. There's more to it than that. There's a mystique the Jews have
built very carefully around themselves and nurtured diligently. It is
a mystique of piety and injured innocence. It is a mystique that says
to the Gentile world: "We are a gentle and inoffensive race, and
because of this everyone hates us. We're smart and we work hard and
achieve success, and because of this everyone hates us. We are a
highly moral and ethical race, and because of this everyone hates us.
We are a very talented race, with many gifted members, many geniuses,
and because of this everyone hates us. We are a very altruistic race,
a race of philanthropists who only want to make a better world for
everyone, and because of this everyone hates us."
Many simpletons among the lemmings simply accept these claims at face
value. Many knowledgeable people, however, who can see through these
claims to the real Jews hiding behind them, still hesitate to
challenge them. Part of the Jewish mystique is the so-called
"Holocaust." In its most simpleminded form the "Holocaust" story is
the claim that the
Germans hated the Jews for the reasons I just mentioned -- for their
gentleness and their success and their morality and their talent and
their altruism -- and because of this hatred roasted six million of
them during the Second World War in "gas ovens," to use one of the
Jews' favorite "Holocaust" phrases.
Actually, the "Holocaust" is a very powerful part of the Jewish
mystique. The Jews crafted the "Holocaust" story with great care and
great effort -- well, actually not with as much care as they might
have used: it's as full of holes as a Swiss cheese, but still it is
sufficient to make most people, even those who understand what Jews
are really like, hesitate to attack them. People don't want to be seen
as bullies. They don't want to be seen as so insensitive that they
would criticize the Jews, who already have suffered so much, poor
dears, at the hands of anti-Semites.
In several past broadcasts we've looked at a number of the lies and
exaggerations and distortions that make up the "Holocaust" story.
There are a number of good books available on the subject from the
sponsor of this broadcast, National Vanguard Books, including Norman
Finklestein's excellent book The Holocaust Industry, which I discussed
in an earlier broadcast. The point is that despite the lies, despite
the fact that many knowledgeable Americans are aware of the lies, the
"Holocaust" still serves its purpose for the Jews. People are afraid
of the image conjured up by the "Holocaust."
Perhaps it's that American life is too soft... Whatever the reason,
many otherwise knowledgeable and hardheaded Americans just can't
entertain the idea of rounding up the Jews and getting rid of them,
even when the situation is as urgent as it is in America today. And
really, in the long run that is the only way to solve the Jewish
problem.
The Germans understood that, back in the 1930s, and they had the
courage and the foresight to act on their understanding. Unlike
Americans today, they had an honest government concerned above all
with the survival, welfare, and progress of the German people, and
they began doing what was necessary, forcing the Jews to emigrate
wholesale from Germany beginning in 1933. And because of that the
Jewish propaganda machine has attacked the Germans so viciously, has
so blackened and demonized their image, that today even knowledgeable
people are afraid to be associated with that image. They are afraid to
say that the Germans were right, that the Germans were justified, and
that we need to do the same if we are to survive. So, as I said, the
"Holocaust" story, despite its
glaring discrepancies and lies, still serves as a shield for the Jews;
it still protects them from criticism.
Well, mostly. In parts of Europe not quite as poisoned by Jewish
propaganda as America is, the shield has slipped a bit. A large
British department store chain, Selfridges, has yielded to demands
from anti-Israel demonstrators and has removed from its shelves
products marked "Made in Israel." Last week the second largest
supermarket chain in Norway, Coop Norge -- which is to say, Norway
Coop, announced its decision to boycott all Israeli imports. That
decision was not the result of pressure from anti-Israel demonstrators
but was based on the feeling by Coop Norge management that it would be
immoral to continue supporting the Israeli economy by selling Israeli
imports under the
present circumstances. That is a step forward, though it is a long way
from what is needed.
The Jews, of course, immediately began waving their "Holocaust" story
around, and now, as the boycott movement catches hold in Scandinavia,
they are trying to portray themselves as injured innocents being
attacked once more by "anti-Semites." They are comparing the growing
Scandinavian boycott of Israeli products to the German boycott of
Jewish merchants in the late 1930s. Certainly, a boycott of Israeli
products is a good thing, and the fact that such a boycott is even
thinkable by big businessmen today is a sign that the Jewish mystique
-- and in particular the Jewish "Holocaust" story -- is becoming a bit
shopworn. It no longer has the hypnotic power that it once had -- at
least, in some parts of the world. And I suppose that we should be
happy about that. The unfortunate fact remains, however, that in
America the Jews still have their money and
their media and their entrenched network of bureaucrats, and even if
the "Holocaust" story has lost some of its charm in Europe, it still
keeps most knowledgeable Americans intimidated.
Knowledge isn't enough. Courage and boldness also are necessary.
Honesty and forthrightness are necessary also. Tiptoeing around the
critical issues of our time isn't enough. Tiny reforms in our
disastrous foreign policy and in our disastrous immigration policy and
in a dozen other disastrous policies aren't enough. We need to stop
apologizing to the people who are destroying us and go full bore at
destroying them instead.
Instead of being hypnotized by the "Holocaust" story we need to look
with clear eyes at why there was a need for action against the Jews in
Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. The Jews' claim today that the Germans
were suffering from collective insanity and had no reason for trying
to get the Jews off their backs is as phony as George Bush's claim
that
Osama bin Laden had no reason for attacking America on September 11.
Wherever Jews go they corrupt and destroy. That is their nature,
always and everywhere. Let us be thankful to the Palestinians who now
are making such terrible sacrifices to help the world see what the
Jews are like. And I suppose we also should be thankful to Ariel
Sharon for demonstrating so forthrightly to the world what Jews are
like.
Let us hope that the conflict between Jews and Palestinians
intensifies and lasts long enough to wake up many more of our people
around the world and fill them with disgust at America's continuing
support for the Jews. Let us hope that it lasts long enough to bring
about the overthrow of every collaborationist regime in the Muslim
world. Let us hope that it brings about an airtight oil embargo
against the United States and shuts off the lights in every shopping
mall and every sports stadium in America long enough for the lemmings
to become restless and begin asking questions. Let us hope that it
makes the efforts of every fool and every traitor who is striving for
a resumption of the so-called "peace process" so obviously futile that
these efforts no longer have the power to deceive anyone.
Ultimately, of course, we must not depend on the Palestinian suicide
bombers or on Ariel Sharon's murder squads to do for us what we should
be doing for ourselves. Ultimately we must stop tiptoeing and begin
marching boldly and forthrightly toward solving our own problems."
Topaz
Last Saturday George Bush addressed the United Nations General
Assembly, urging all of the member nations to join the United States
in bringing pressure to bear against all countries that sponsor
terrorism or harbor terrorists. He did it in his standard mock-serious
way, barely suppressing a smirk. Everyone applauded, including the
representative of a country that from its founding until the present
day has sponsored
terrorism. That country, of course, is Israel.
The prime minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon, is a war criminal, a mass
murderer, with the blood of thousands of women and children on his
hands. He is being sought now for trial by the same Hague Tribunal
that succeeded in extraditing former Yugoslav President Slobodan
Milosevic for trial on charges of crimes against humanity in Kosovo,
the same
Hague Tribunal that already has tried and sentenced soldiers who raped
and murdered in Bosnia and in Rwanda.
In 1982, during Israel's invasion of Lebanon, Ariel Sharon was
Israel's defense minister. After the bloody terror-bombing of civilian
neighborhoods in Beirut that killed thousands of Lebanese and
Palestinian civilians -- terror bombing carried out by Jews flying
military aircraft supplied to Israel by the United States - Sharon
arranged for the evacuation of Palestinian fighters from Lebanon.
Palestinian women, children, and old people were left behind in
refugee camps, with their safety guaranteed by the United States. On
the night of September 16, 1982, Sharon sent murder squads into two
Palestinian refugee camps, Sabra and Chatila, in West Beirut to kill
the unarmed
Palestinian civilians in the camps. With Israeli tanks and troops
surrounding the camps to prevent any of the Palestinians from
escaping, Sharon's murder squads shot, knifed, and bludgeoned
Palestinian civilians all that night and the next day and the
following night, while the Israelis around the camps listened
gleefully to the shots and screams coming from inside. Then Sharon
sent in bulldozers to scoop out mass burial pits and cover up the
corpses of more than 2,000 Palestinian women and children.
Many Palestinians remained unburied, however, and Red Cross workers
found whole families in their homes with their throats cut and other
families who had been lined up and machine-gunned, from small children
to elderly grandparents. One infant had been stomped to death by a man
wearing spiked boots.
This was Ariel Sharon's work, but only a part of his work. He is a man
who believes the teaching of the Talmud that only Jews are human
beings, and that all who are not Jews were put on this earth only to
serve the Jews, and that anyone who opposes the Jews deserves to be
killed, and he has acted in accord with this belief all his life.
There are a dozen major atrocities for which he could be tried by the
Hague Tribunal, but the one with which he is charged now is the mass
murder he implemented, as Israel's defense minister, in West Beirut in
September 1982. And the U.S. government, which clamored for Slobodan
Milosevic to be turned over to the Hague Tribunal for trial, pretends
that it knows nothing about Sharon's genocidal crimes against
humanity.
In the 1950s Israel's Mossad, the equivalent of the CIA in the United
States, sent hundreds of letter bombs to German scientists working in
Egypt and Syria, killing a number of them.
In 1967, during Israel's war against Egypt, the Israeli army carried
out a number of mass executions of Egyptian prisoners of war in the
Sinai, forcing them to dig ditches, then lining them up and shooting
them. Dozens of eyewitnesses to these mass executions have reported
what they saw, but the world's politicians and media bosses pretend
not to know.
Also in 1967 Israel attacked the U.S. Navy ship, the U.S.S. Liberty,
attempting to sink it and kill its crew and then blame the sinking on
the Egyptians.
Israeli agents have carried out assassinations and other terrorist
operations around the world. One of the most colorful of these
operations -- and one of the few that received major media coverage -
was the attempt to murder a prominent Muslim cleric in Jordan in 1997.
Two Israeli agents sprayed poison in the ear of Khaled Meshal as they
walked past him on a sidewalk in Amman. Fortunately, Meshal's
bodyguards were able to catch the two Jews as they ran away, and so
the assassination attempt was publicized.
Israel has stolen nuclear materials and nuclear weapons technology
from the United States to build an illegal nuclear arsenal. Israel
also is known to have developed an arsenal of biological and chemical
weapons of mass destruction.
None of these Israeli activities is secret. Those I've mentioned are
just a few of the ones that were found out and publicized. Not
publicized very much, of course. In fact, they all were dropped from
the news pretty quickly. Still, everyone attending Mr. Bush's speech
at the United Nations last Saturday knew about them. And yet, no one
stood up and booed. No one walked out in protest. Bush's speech was
covered by all of the major newspapers and television networks in the
world, but no reporter for any news medium operating in the West
commented on his hypocrisy. No one mentioned Israel's terrorism.
Everyone knew, but everyone played along.
These people weren't lemmings. Lemmings really don't know any better.
Lemmings are essentially moral creatures; in fact they are
compulsively moral. To lemmings it is essential to feel and think and
act the way they believe they are expected to feel and think and act.
That's morality. Most groups of lemmings believe that it is bad to
lie, to deceive, to be hypocritical. If during George Bush's speech at
the United Nations a substantial part of the audience had walked out
in disgust, and at the end the remaining delegates had stood up and
booed him loudly, and if the media commentators then had remarked with
scorn to their television audiences that Bush is a hypocrite who talks
about stopping state-sponsored terrorism while continuing to finance
Israeli terrorism, the lemmings would have booed him too.
But Bush's lies and hypocrisy were ignored by the media and by the
other delegates. Instead of booing, they applauded him. And so the
lemmings applauded him too. It was all an act for the benefit of the
lemmings. Nearly all politics these days, nearly every speech or
public appearance by a politician or a government official, is an act
of showmanship. What is said has relatively little relationship to
what the politician
actually is thinking.
ertainly, last Saturday George Bush wasn't really thinking about
waging war on countries that sponsor terrorism or harbor terrorists.
He was thinking first and foremost about the importance of pleasing
the Jewish media with his speech. He may have been keeping his fingers
crossed and hoping that no Arab delegate would jump up during his
speech and shout at him, "What about Israel? You say that we should
wage war on states that sponsor terrorism. Israel engages in
state-sponsored terrorism more than Afghanistan and all the other
countries in the Middle East combined. When will you send your B-52s
to carpet-bomb Tel Aviv and Jerusalem?" And at the end he must have
marveled to himself how smoothly the act went and how easy it is to
deceive the public.
Crookedness of this sort has been going on for a long time. There are
only two things that make this latest crookedness noteworthy. First,
it is being used to justify yet another war that is not in the
interests of the American people. It is being used to justify dropping
cluster bombs on villagers whom we have no good reason to kill. And
second, it is a lot more obviously crooked than usual. Osama bin Laden
caught the Bush government and the media by surprise, and they didn't
have time to refine and polish their lies. All they could do was
pretend that they had no idea why he would attack the United States
and then claim that it must be because he hates our freedom. They
didn't have time to put up
their usual smokescreen of obfuscation. They simply launched their
denunciations of terrorism and terrorists and of governments that
tolerate terrorism and hoped that no one would say anything about
Israel or Ariel Sharon or Israel's policies of assassination and
torture.
Because the crookedness is more obvious now than usual, more
perceptive people than usual are noticing it and saying something
about it, and that's good. But these perceptive few who are unhappy
enough about the crookedness to speak out have little or no voice in
the mass media, and so the lemmings remain oblivious to the realities
of the situation.
That's the wonderful thing about democracy: you don't have to try to
fool all of the people; all you have to do is fool most of the people
all of the time, and that's pretty easy to do when you control the
mass media. You can just ignore the few who refuse to go along with
the act, and the great majority of the voters will never notice.
So why do I care that the system is crooked? Why should you care? Why
not just pretend not to notice the crookedness and go along with it,
like everyone else? Pretend to be a lemming, but stay alert to
possibilities for profiting from the fact that, unlike the lemmings,
you really are secretly aware of who's who and what's what. That's
what the
big shots do. That's what the people do who care only about themselves
and don't give a damn what happens to their country or their race or
the civilization built by their race, as long as they personally are
able to turn a profit from events. That's what George Bush does. He
pretends to care about all sorts of things. He pretends to be outraged
by terrorism, but he shakes Ariel Sharon's hand and gives him a big
hug whenever Sharon shows up in Washington. He pretends not to be
aware of Sharon's record as a mass murderer, a war criminal, a
terrorist, a man who sends out teams of assassins and orders the
Israeli police to torture prisoners.
A lot of people think and behave the way George Bush does. A lot of
people believe that's the only smart way to be. We're living in a
society in which a great many people are completely alienated,
completely disconnected from any sense of responsibility to race or
nation or to anyone but themselves: amoral people, people willing to
do anything they believe is personally advantageous, people for whom
every public expression is simply an act. And because there are so
many people like that, including virtually everyone in the government
and in the media, America is very, very sick.
I'll go further: individuals who think and behave that way are sick.
George Bush is a very sick man. Anyone who consciously and
deliberately betrays his own race or his own nation, anyone who
commits treason, is a defective person, a sick person. And George
Bush, by consciously following a policy he knows is not in the
interests of America but only serves Israel's interests, a policy he
knows is responsible for the September 11 attack against America, a
policy he continues to follow despite that knowledge, is a traitor.
That's George Bush I'm talking about, the President of the United
States. He may look stupid, but he knows what he's doing. George Bush
believes he's a smart guy, a guy who
knows which side his bread is buttered on, a guy who can get away with
anything as long as the Jewish media will back him up. And so far he
has been getting away with it. In a democracy, hypocrisy works; lying
works. As long as you have the mass media on your side you can get
away with anything, because the majority of the voters never will
figure it out.
What has been happening in Mazar-i-Sharif and Kabul and other northern
cities in Afghanistan this week is a good example. The big act put on
by George Bush and his British counterpart Tony Blair and all of their
media supporters since the campaign to destabilize Afghanistan began
last month -- the big act was that the Taliban is a bunch of
tyrannical fanatics who brutalize women, sponsor terrorism, and do
lots of other bad things, and the Northern Alliance, which was
supplied with weapons and money by the U.S. government while we bombed
the Taliban to smithereens, is a bunch of Sunday school teachers and
Boy Scouts. The United States will deliver Afghanistan into the hands
of the Northern Alliance, and then everything will be rosy and
peaceful and democratic. The people who had been tyrannized by the
Taliban will be free and happy
under the Northern Alliance. The Americans will be the good guys, who
have made this wonderful improvement possible.
Well, of course, it hasn't worked out that way. As soon as the
Northern Alliance took over each city it began rounding up people it
didn't like, people who belonged to the wrong tribe, for example, and
raping and killing them. There have been dozens of mass executions and
mass rapes by the Northern Alliance troops this week. There are a lot
of people they don't like. And the ones who just get raped or shot are
the lucky ones. Eyes are being gouged out, breasts are being cut off,
prisoners are being castrated and impaled and skinned alive or burned
to death. That's the way things are done in the Middle East. When the
British tried to pacify the country in the 19th century, the rule was
never to
let yourself be taken alive. If you were wounded and left behind, you
always saved your last cartridge for yourself. Rudyard Kipling wrote
about that:
"When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
"And the women come out to cut up what remains,
"Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
"An' go to your Gawd like a soldier."
The Russians learned the same lesson, to their sorrow, just a little
over a decade ago. And the military people around George Bush
certainly were aware of the experiences of the British and the
Russians. The Taliban indeed may be a rough and brutal bunch, but no
more rough and brutal than the people paid and armed by the U.S.
government. When the
Taliban was in charge at least there was peace and stability. There
were no massacres or gang rapes. The U.S. government, with its bombing
campaign and its mercenary troops in the Northern Alliance, has
succeeded in destabilizing large portions of Afghanistan, and the
rapes and mutilations and mass executions have started.
But the lemmings won't hear enough about that for it to sink in.
George Bush will continue lying and smirking and pretending that the
Northern Alliance are the good guys, and America is bringing freedom
and democracy and happiness to Afghanistan. What the United States
actually is trying to do is set up a government a little more corrupt
than that
of the Taliban: a government that we can control with bribes and
threats and that will not be a danger to Israel. That's the whole
purpose of our war against Afghanistan.
It's the same sort of crookedness that we saw in connection with the
Second World War. The pretext that the British government used for
declaring war against Germany in 1939 was the safeguarding of Poland's
freedom. When the Roosevelt government in the United States finally
was able to use the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor as an excuse for
jumping into the war against Germany, the act by the media and the
politicians here was that Americans were being the good guys and would
bomb the Germans to smithereens in order to protect American freedom
and the freedom of Europe. And the people to whom we shipped military
supplies so they could help us were the Soviets under good old Uncle
Joe Stalin, that kind and fatherly fellow who also was being
threatened by the wicked Germans.
Of course, what we did, after carpet-bombing German cities and killing
enough Germans to make them surrender, was turn Poland and the Baltic
states and half the rest of Europe over to communist rule for half a
century. It had never been the intention of either the British
government or the U.S. government to free anybody. We knew what sort
of people the communists were. We knew that they had butchered the
cream of the Polish nation in the Katyn forest and elsewhere - 25,000
Polish military officers and professors and physicians and engineers
and writers - but our government and media people pretended that it
was the Germans who had done it and that we were "liberating" Europe
from the
Germans and protecting American freedom, which never was threatened by
the Germans.
It was all an act. The aim was not to safeguard anybody's freedom; it
was to destroy Germany because the Germans had gotten the Jews off
their backs and out of their country. We made war against Germany in
order to make Europe safe for the Jews and for no other reason. We are
making war against Afghanistan now in order to make the Middle East
safe for the Jews, and for no other reason. Everything else is an act
to keep the public fooled. And the public will be fooled: just as they
never figured out what World War Two was all about, they won't figure
out what the war against Afghanistan is all about. They may hear
rumors about the massacres being carried out now by the Northern
Alliance, but the television people won't spell it out for them, won't
show them gory pictures of the piles of corpses, and so the public
won't get it.
So again, why should you care? Why not just go along with the act, the
way the big shots do?
That's a hard question to answer, in this sense: If you're like George
Bush or any of the other big shots who think they're being smart by
going along with the act and collaborating with the Jews against their
own people - if you think that's the smart way to behave - then you
won't understand my answer, no matter how carefully I explain it. If
you're a person who already is totally alienated - if you're an amoral
person who already is completely disconnected from your race and its
traditions and values and you think of yourself solely as an
individual scrambling to get an advantage over other individuals by
any means that will work - you won't understand my answer.
But if you still have some sense of being a part of something larger
and more permanent than yourself -- if you still have a sense of
racial identity, a sense of kinship with a larger family of fellow
Europeans, of fellow White men and women with whom you share
traditions and values and a way of looking at the world - if you value
the civilization your ancestors built over the last 5,000 years, if
you think of it as your civilization - then my answer is superfluous.
You already know the answer. You already understand why you must not
collaborate with creatures who secretly sneer at your values, who are
contemptuous of the traditions and history of your people, who have
been working for
thousands of years to corrupt your civilization, and who are
determined to annihilate your race. You already understand why men who
do collaborate with these creatures must not be permitted to make laws
and set policies governing your people. You understand that instead of
being applauded and looked at with respect, they should be hanged as
traitors
and as a warning to others who might be tempted also to betray our
people. You already understand that truthfulness and righteousness are
their own reward.
Thanks for being with me again today.
Topaz
"Knowing who did the terrorism of September 11 is important, but why
they did
it is even more important to us.
Yet, strangely, there has been little discussion in the mass media on
why the attack occurred. Politicians and media personalities have
given us completely inadequate explanations why a couple of dozen
young men would blow themselves up to get at us. In fact, they have
told us absurd lies to keep Americans from understanding the real
reason for the attacks.
We have been told that the attackers were simply crazy, cowardly men
who committed a quote "unprovoked attack." Media and government
spokesmen repeatedly assured us that these attacks had "nothing to do
with America's support of Israel." The official view, as expressed by
the President to the U.S. Congress, was that the terrorists attacked
us because they hate our freedom! Here is an excerpt of his remarks
before Congress
"Americans are asking, "Why do they hate us?"
"They hate what they see right here in this chamber: a democratically
elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our
freedoms."
I am not trying to be disrespectful, but what he said is so ridiculous
that even this intellectually challenged President cannot really
believe it. Does Bush really think that a bunch of young men would
give up their families, their homes, and immolate themselves in a huge
ball of fire simply because they hate our democracy! Right on Mr.
President! Next week, will we will hear about Islamic kamikazes
crashing planes into Iceland, the oldest enduring democracy on earth.
Mr. Bush is asking America to support a massive war over the next ten
years. We are being asked to support a massive conflict whose huge
costs could well bankrupt America and cause the loss of great numbers
of American lives. Before we can make such a crucial decision, we
deserve to have the whole truth concerning this cataclysmic event.
Of course, Mr. Bush did not tell us the truth; he simply repeated the
Big Lie put out by the American mass media.
Saying that these acts were born out of hatred for freedom is a
calculated lie to divert us from associating this disaster with our
support for Israel.
You see, associating the attack with our Israeli policy would be bad
public relations for Israel and the Jewish Lobby. The last thing they
want is for the American people to realize that our unconditional
support of Israel has directly led to this disaster.
If the American people clearly understand that fact, people might
begin to ask a similar question to the one asked by Leslie Stahl, "Is
our support of Israel really worth it?"
To keep people from asking that obvious question, the media made up
the Big Lie that the men of October 11 were simply crazy, cowardly
people who hated freedom and democracy!
The real reason for the attack
Even the date the terrorists chose for this attack shows their true
motivation.
The attack occurred on September 11. That is the anniversary of the
League of Nations proclaiming in Palestine the British Mandate in
1922. The date represents the first physical step toward the
implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the establishment of
Israel.
Why has the mass media kept this important fact from the American
people?
Frankly, this fact has been suppressed because the American media are
thoroughly dominated by Jews. Many Americans suspect that Jews have
disproportionate influence in the press, but their actual power is
more than most people imagine. If you want documented proof of their
enormous media power, just go to my web page, www.davidduke.com and
read the "Who Runs the Media?" chapter from my book, My Awakening.
(Located at http://www.davidduke.com/awakening/chapter19_01.html)
Just as Jewish Israel-Firsters dominate the mass media, so the Israeli
Lobby afflicts Congress and the President. It should anger every
American to think that the most powerful lobby in Congress is in the
service of a foreign nation. Yet, the immense power of the Jewish
Lobby is a proven fact, and nobody on Capitol Hill will dare defy this
all-powerful lobby. Even one of the most powerful U.S. Senators in
American history, William Fulbright, bluntly said on CBS's Face the
Nation, that, "Israel controls the U.S.
Senate."
Recently, a Hebrew Israeli radio station, Kol Yisrael, on October 3rd
reported that during an argument in an Israeli cabinet meeting, Shimon
Peres warned Prime Minister Ariel Sharon that unless he would heed
American requests for a cease fire with the Palestinians, he could
cause America to turn against Israel. In a fit of anger, Sharon
responded to Peres:
"Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will
do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry
about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control
America, and the Americans know it." (2)
The media bosses and the Israel-bought politicians know the real
reasons behind this terrorism. They have read the interviews of Osama
Bin Laden. He and almost every other Islamic opponent of America has
put support for Israel at the top of their top ten reasons for hating
America. Bin Laden and countless millions in the Muslim world regard
the attacks on Lebanon, on Iraq, on Libya, on Iran, on Afghanistan and
on Sudan as a direct result of Israel's control over America.
They point out that the many Israeli massacres of Palestinians, the
ongoing torture of thousands of prisoners, the use of assassination of
political enemies, the bombing of refugee camps, and the expansive
wars launched by Israeli's against their Arab neighbors; that all
these Israeli crimes are completely dependent on unconditional
American aid. They also see the deaths of the 500,000 Iraqi children,
as admitted by our former Jewish Secretary of State, as a direct
result of Jewish control of America.
The American people, who are under the bombardment of a biased
multimedia, might not realize the Jewish control of American foreign
policy, but the Palestinians and their allies such as Bin Laden, all
understand it; and they hate us for it.
In fact, the same mass media that are giving out the Big Lie that the
terrorist motivation is "hate for freedom," are clearly aware of Bin
Laden's real motivations.
I can easily prove the true motivation of bin Laden and I can prove
the media has known the truth all along. In May of 1998 reporter John
Miller of ABC interviewed Bin Laden. Bin Laden talks about why he
seeks to attack America. You can find it on the ABC and the PBS web
sites. Here are excerpts of bin Laden's own words.
"For over half a century, Muslims in Palestine have been slaughtered
and assaulted and robbed of their honor and of their property. Their
houses have been blasted, their crops destroyed.
"This is my message to the American people: to look for a serious
government that looks out for their interests and does not attack
other people's lands, or other people's honor. And my word to American
journalists is not to ask why we did that but ask what their
government has done that forced us to defend ourselves."
"So we tell the Americans as people, and we tell the mothers of
soldiers and American mothers in general that if they value their
lives and the lives of their children, to find a patriotic government
that will look after their interests and not the interests of the
Jews."
I say to them that they have put themselves at the mercy of a disloyal
government, and this is most evident in Clinton's administration. We
believe that this administration represents Israel inside America.
Take the sensitive ministries such as the Secretary of State and the
Secretary of Defense and the CIA, you will find that the Jews have the
upper hand in them. They make use of America to further their plans
for the world.
In the interview, bin Laden never said one word about opposing
democratic principles, nor has he ever done so in his lifetime. So,
now we know Laden's true motivation. He attacked us not because he
"hates democracy", but because he thinks Israel controls and uses
America to attack his people."
David Duke
(1) THE SUNDAY MAIL (2001) Sept. 16
(2) Israeli Hebrew radio, Col Yisrael Wednesday
---------------------------------------------------------------
Your support makes our work possible. We need your help now more than
ever.
Please help our efforts with an online donation today.
Make a donation today by clicking here:
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/donate.shtml
IMPORTANT ONLINE LINKS
Learn more about EURO at: http://www.whitecivilrights.com/faq.shtml
How to join EURO online: http://www.whitecivilrights.com/join.shtml
How to download an application and mail it in:
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/join.shtml
Where to find local EURO Chapters:
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/ero_contacts.shtml
Where to read our press releases:
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/news/
Watch news clips and interviews:
http://www.davidduke.com/video/index.html
Where to buy books, tapes or stickers: www.davidduke.net
Read sample chapters online from David Duke's book "My Awakening":
http://www.davidduke.com/awakening/toc.html
Topaz
B'razeer Boobar
wrote:
>"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
>East recently
That's just a drop in the bucket.
Muslim terrorism has become global.
Topaz
wrote:
>
>That's just a drop in the bucket.
>
>Muslim terrorism has become global.
Jewish control of governments other that Muslim governments is
global.
Terrorism is used-and has been used throughout history-by
virtually every people that does not possess state power. It's the
poor man's weapon, so to speak. By the definition of terrorism that
the United States government uses, the patriots of 1775 were
terrorists. Most Americans know that the opening shots of the
American war for independence from Britain were fired at Lexington
and Concord. What really happened in that exchange was that the
British soldiers stationed in Boston marched to nearby Lexington and
Concord to seize illegal caches of weapons in those places. As they
were going back and forth, American patriots fired on the British
soldiers who were trying to do their job..
When the United States opposed the Soviet incursion into Afghanistan,
our government gave weapons to the Afghan rebels who were fighting the
Soviets. The Soviets called the rebels "terrorists." One of the most
famous of the Afghan leaders fighting against the Soviet occupation-
although he was originally from Saudi Arabia-was Osama bin Laden.
He may not have been a great commander, but the United States
government considered him a "good guy" when he was fighting against
the Soviet occupation, blowing up Soviet tanks, and killing Soviet
soldiers.
Throughout history this is how it has gone. Two or three Prime
Ministers of Israel have well-documented records as terrorists.
Menachem Begin was the head of the Irgun terrorist organization in
the years before Israel became a state. Yitzhak Shamir, who was a
leader in the so-called Stern gang, had a price on his head that the
British authorities were willing to pay to anyone who could turn him
over to them, because the Stern gang murdered British subjects and
other people. And of course, even an Israeli commission found Ariel
Sharon responsible for the terrible massacres at Sabra and Shatila
during the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon. The United States has
rolled out the red carpet on numerous occasions for these men who
have well documented records as terrorists, criminals, murderers or
whatever you may want to call them.
Now we have a government that, in the name of a war against
terrorism, has proclaimed an open-ended war against whomever the
leaders in Washington think we ought to oppose. This included Iraq,
of course, and now they're gearing up for a war against Iran. But
the more the American people know about history, the more they
should be able to see just how threadbare and deceitful these
slogans like "war on terrorism" really are..
advlis...@nationalvanguard.com
B'razeer Boobar
wrote:
> Jewish control of governments other that Muslim governments is
>global.
Cites, por favor.
suckTHESE
Henry Von Sweitzenheimer
moehammad liked to bury his root in little girls.
Doug
"suckTHESE" <clit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cb87863d-ba28-4d78...@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.zipperfish.com/free/yaafm12.swf
Doug
news:4788e576...@news.isp.com...
HIs word, like the Profet's, is the truth. It is unquestionable.
Topaz
wrote:
>On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:52:19 -0600, Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com>
The following is from:
<http://home.att.ne.jp/moon/fischer/list/p_54/54_0.htm>:
On July 13th 2004 at about 5:25 p.m. Robert James Fischer("Bobby"
Fischer) entered the Japanese immigration dept. on his way to Japan
Airlines flight JL 745 departing from Tokyo/Narita airport at 6:20
p.m.
for Manila Philippines. Bobby gave the immigration lady his passport
and she quickly stamped his exit visa. However he'd forgotten to fill
out the immigration departure form. She told him to fill it out at a
nearby writing stand. He took it over there and filled it out. But
when Bobby returned a couple of minutes later an immigration man had
replaced her. Bobby gave him back his passport and the filled out
immigration form. However when the immigration man put his passport
under a special light a beep went off or was set off and Bobby was
detained. Bobby was asked to take a nearby seat while they found out
what was the problem. Bobby took the seat and as he was waiting he
heard someone on the phone fiercely barking instructions to an
immigration official. The immigration official kept repeating in a
loud
militaristic manner "hai, hai!" After Bobby had waited there about 15
minutes or so he told the immigration official talking on the plone
that
his plane was leaving shortly and that he didn't want to miss the
flight. By now all pretense of civility was gone and the immigration
official fairly shouted at Bobby "I know that sit down!" and went
back
to his bullshit phone call. After waiting there on his seat for about
half an hour or so altogether Bobby was told to accompany various
immigration security officials. Bobby went with them through the
office
to the left of the immigration exit counters and then down a ways to
an
elevator. Bobby and the security officials took the elevator down at
least one floor. Then Bobby and the immigration security officials
took
a long walk down the dark and narrow corridor to Bobby was told not
where. The atmosphere had turned threatening, foreboding, hostile and
sinister. The place was completely apart and isolated from other
passengers. There were only immigration types. Bobby asked "Where
are
we going?" He was told they were going to an office to talk. Bobby
stopped walking and said "What's the problem?" Bobby was told that he
should just go to the office to talk. Bobby said "About what?" Bobby
was told "We just talk." At some stage a young extremely fat half
Japanese and half Latino translator made his portly appearance. By
now
Bobby said "I'm not moving until I know what this is all about."
Bobby
tried to start walking in the direction of where he'd come from. He
was
blocked by a smirking young immigration security type. Bobby was now
surrounded by about at least 4 or 5 immigration security types plus
the
translator. The security types kept coming and going but overall
their
number slowly increased! Bobby demanded to know if he was under
arrest
and if so what were the charges against him. Bobby said he wasn't
moving until he found out what this was all about. Over and over and
over again Bobby was asked if he wished to see someone from the U.S.
embassy. Bobby was told he had a right to contact the U.S. embassy.
Bobby was told maybe they can help you. Bobby always answered
immediately and vehemently and with finality that he did not wish to
see
anyone from the U.S. embassy nor did he wish to contact the U.S.
embassy. Bobby explained that the U.S. embassy was itself the problem
not the solution. Bobby explained that the U.S. government is evil
and
that they were out to "get" him. Even the translator conceded to
Bobby
in Spanish that in his opinion Bush is a monster! Bobby asked to call
friend many times but they refused.
After everyone was standing in the hallway for about 45 minutes or so
a
half-crazed security official came out with Bobby's passport and they
showed Bobby what they said was his arrest warrant. But they wouldn't
let Bobby touch it. It appeared to be a 2 page document. It was in
Japanese and English. Bobby tried to read the first page from a
distance but only got a glimpse of the second page. The first page
said
that Bobby had illegally entered Japan and illegally left Japan!!!
Bobby asked "When did I illegally enter Japan?" He was told it was
all
there on the arrest warrant. Bobby said "Where's the date I illegally
entered?" Bobby said maybe it's in Japanese but that he didn't see it
in English. They said it's there in English too. They said that
everything on the arrest warrant was in Japanese and English. If the
date when Bobby allegedly illegally entered Japan was in English or
western numerals Bobby sure didn't see it. The older half-crazed
higher
level immigration official told Bobby that his passport was not valid?
Bobby said "Since when is it not valid?" You mean it was not valid
when
I entered Japan a few months ago?" The kook answered "That's right!"
Bobby continued "It wasn't valid when I entered Japan 3 months ago?
Since when hasn't it been valid." The kook answered "Oh, long before
that!" Bobby pressed on "Since when hasn't been valid?" The kook
answered since last November!!!
The kook said that the U.S. government told them that Bobby's passport
wasn't valid since then. The kooky higher level immigration official
then took out his immigration stamp and stamped Bobby's entry visa and
Bobby's exit visa in the passport invalid. All this without any
investigation or getting Bobby's side of the story. Simply on the
word
of the great United States! Bobby found all of this to be slightly
incredible because Bobby's passport was perfectly valid in every way
with about 2 and half years left on it till it expired on January 23rd
of 2007. Furthermore in October and November of 2003 Bobby had
personally visited the Bern, Switzerland U.S. embassy(the same U.S.
embassy that had originally issued the 10 year passport No. Z7792702
to
Bobby on January 24, 1997) because Bobby's passport was almost
completely full with almost no place left for more visa stamps. Bobby
had been sternly advised on several occasions by both Japanese and
Hong
Kong immigration officials that his passport urgently needed to get
more
pages put into it immediately so there would be space for more visa
stamps. In about late October of 2003 Bobby told the people in the
U.S.
embassy at Bern, Switzerland that he needed more pages for his
passport
otherwise he soon wouldn't be able to travel for lack of space to make
visa stamps. After about 10 days and many phone calls back and forth
and at least 2 visits to the embassy in Bern they finally gave Bobby
the
extra pages for his passport.
The embassy at Bern never explained to Bobby's what the delay was all
about except to say that the state department needed time to make the
decision whether or not to give him the extra pages. To Bobby
surprise
on November 6, 2003 they gave him the 20 or so extra page insert which
they professionally bound into his passport free of charge! Such
service! But that was about 8 months ago in neutral Switzerland. Now
Bobby was in U.S. occupied ?excuse US-U.S. controlled Japan. But it
is
highly significant and important to reemphasize that when Bobby
personally presented his perfectly valid U.S. passport No. Z7792702 to
the U.S. Embassy at Bern, Switzerland on November 6, 2003 far from
confiscating and destroying his passport they actually gave him an
about
20 page insert for it! The embassy perfectly sewed the insert into
Bobby's passport themselves in some high-tech manner so that it
appears
to be an integral part of the passport. If Bobby's passport were
"Illegal" or "revoked" or "Invalid" or whatever then one would think
that that was the time for the embassy to make their claim however
false, unlawful and illegal that claim might be! But that would be
overlooking the political dimension to all of this. Obviously the
filthy Jew-controlled U.S. government preferred to illegally and
criminally grab and destroy Bobby's passport only when Bobby was not
in
neutral Switzerland. So instead they planned to do the job elsewhere
at
a time and manner of their own choosing! The U.S. not only wanted to
grab and destroy Bobby's U.S. passport but more importantly they
wanted
to grab and destroy Bobby too. And neutral Switzerland was not the
right place to do it!
By now Bobby felt certain that there was a real possibility of his
being
chained and handcuffed and flown back to the filthy Jew-controlled
U.S.A. with a bag over his head that very night. So he decided not to
go down without a fight! The immigration officials security types and
the translator told Bobby that he was being detained and/or arrested
and
that he had to go with them. Bobby said "No, I'm not moving." At
this
point Bobby was surrounded by a total of about 15 people including the
translator and a young man with a video camera out and filming. At
this
point the immigration security guards made their move and attacked
Bobby. Bobby didn't touch them until they attacked him first. Of
course Bobby was overwhelmed. A short scuffle broke out where Bobby
ended up trying to protect himself, biting one of the guards who was
trying to grab him (but only biting into his heavy shirt), while he
also
swung his legs around to try to stay free from the group of men
attacking him, before they subdued him. They then put a black or brown
bag over Bobby's head and lifted him up by his legs and arms and
carried
him in a horizontal position to wherever they were taking him. Hands
and arms and legs were all over Bobby pummeling him, pushing him,
twisting him, suffocating him. One or more guards was deliberately
inflicting great pain by constantly twisting Bobby's right arm. Bobby
was sure it was going to break but it didn't. Also Bobby felt one or
more guards were trying to put handcuffs on him. Finally Bobby was
dumped into a room where one or more guards was sitting on or
otherwise
putting strong pressure on Bobby's back. All of the air was forced
out
of Bobby's lungs. What very little breathing Bobby could even attempt
to do was also blocked by the black or brown bag on his head. Bobby
shouted over and over again that "I can't breathe, I can't breathe"
but
they paid no attention. Bobby twisted his head back and forth
furiously
all the while shouting "I can't breathe I can't breathe!"
This went on for what seemed like about a minute or two. Bobby only
had
about a second or two left before he would have passed out and/or
died.
Bobby was already thinking: "So this is how I will die. Will my
friends
and loved ones ever really know the truth about how I was murdered?
What will the press say about it? It was all planned this way by the
Jews! It really is true all the horror stories all the "suicides'
all
the murders in custody! It's so damned easy!it's so quick! "Suddenly
after what seemed like an eternity the guy or guys got off of Bobby's
back and he could breathe! Apparently they'd just been taking their
sweet time about robbing Bobby's belongings, taking his belt and shoes
off taking his handcuffs off etc. Maybe they didn't want Bobby to see
the handcuffs. Or maybe one or more of them wanted to kill Bobby but
one or more of them didn't. Whatever Bobby is still alive! The bag
was
gone from Bobby's head the cuffs were off and Bobby was alone in a
prison cell. Bobby's belt was gone and so was his money his wallet,
shoes, etc. The young man continued to video Bobby from outside the
bars for sometime even after the guards left the prison cell. Now
Bobby
had time to survey the damage. His right arm hurt very much but
apparently was not broken. His right wrist was bloodied and bruised
with a good sized gash on the outside part of his right wrist about an
half an inch above the wrist-bone. A number of his teeth had been
chipped or broken or worse in the melee. After the fight Bobby took
out
a piece of one of his teeth and saved it. Bobby's left cheekbone was
also sore and obviously was hurt during the fight. OK. Let's move on
to the next phase.
The next day on July14th 2004 the guards came into Bobby's cell and
told
him that he had a visitor from the U.S. embassy in Tokyo who wanted to
see him. Bobby told them he didn't want to see anyone from the U.S.
embassy. They told Bobby that he had no choice. Bobby refused to go.
They grabbed Bobby by his arms and legs and told Bobby that he was
going
to see the visitor from U.S. embassy whether he liked it or not!
Bobby
was still hurting badly from the night before so he decided to go
without any further struggle. They took Bobby to a room (not the
special "visitors room" where the prisoner and the visitor are
separated
by a glass window) where the U.S. embassy man was either already
there
waiting or else came in a minute or so later. The embassy man did all
the talking while Bobby didn't say a word. He had in front of him on
his side of the table what appeared to be the remnants of Bobby's U.S.
passport. It now had numerous large holes in it along the edges.
Also
something appeared to be stamped on the inside of it. The embassy man
also had a photo copy of a letter or a purported letter to Bobby from
the United States embassy in Manila, Philippines dated December 11,
2003
advising Bobby that his passport was revoked. The embassy man
explained
to Bobby with what can only be described as a deliberate tongue in
cheek
or mock cat that ate the canary look on his face and obvious malicious
glee that since the State department didn't know exactly where to
reach
Bobby they thought that this would be the best chance to notify Bobby
of
the revocation of his passport because they know that Bobby visits the
Philippines from time to time! (Needless to say Bobby had never seen
or
heard of this letter before his forced meeting with the embassy man on
July 14, 2004. We'll have more to say about this letter later on.)
The embassy man further explained to Bobby that the revocation of his
passport would not hinder him from receiving from the U.S. embassy in
Tokyo a one time one trip passport only good to return to the United
States! The embassy man then added that well if Bobby had no further
questions he'd be leaving. Then he looked at Bobby intently and
maliciously and with twinkling eyes shot out: "Well, Mr. Fischer if
you
have no objection I'll be taking your passport back to the embassy
with
me." This was meant to be his coup de grace or piece de resistance.
What would Bobby say? What would Bobby do? If Bobby remained silent
the embassy man would say that Bobby didn't object to him taking
Bobby's
mutilated and destroyed passport back to the embassy with him. And
then
by extension the embassy man would claim or imply (with a straight
face)
that well, maybe Mr. Fischer didn't really mind that the U.S. had
grabbed and destroyed his passport because after all he knew that we
had
the legal right to do so! On the other hand if Bobby answered and said
that he does object he would break his silence and then the embassy
man
could say that Bobby had voluntarily met with him and that they had a
voluntary conversation and that Bobby didn't say this or he didn't say
that or he didn't assert his rights here or he didn't assert his
rights
there etc. Bobby answered and said, "Give me back my passport you son
of a bitch!" At which the embassy man winced and replied that oh well
yes I'll leave it here with the security people with your belongings.
(he broke that promise about 5 minutes later when he left the Narita
airport immigration lockup with Bobby's passport! Jesus, usually it
takes even a Jew a little longer than that to break his word!) Bobby
asked the embassy man if he was a Jew. The embassy man said "Are
you?"
Bobby said "I asked you first!" The embassy man said that oh, no he
wasn't going to play that game, that he didn't have answer that
question. Bobby asked the embassy man his name. The embassy man said
his first name was "Peter." Bobby asked "Peter" "What's your last
name?" "Peter" told Bobby that "that doesn't concern you!" The
arrogance and criminality of the U.S. embassy people is almost
unbelievable. And at just about that point their conversation came to
an end and "Peter" left their meeting room. As Bobby was waiting in
the
meeting room with the door open for the guards to come and lead him
back
to his prison cell he saw "Peter" being so kind and effusive and
"respectful" with the Japanese immigration authorities as he shook
hands
with them one by one and bid them goodbye! A real gentleman, a real
gentleman!
By the way we should mention at some point and this is as good a time
as
any that after he was illegally arrested and imprisoned on July 13,
2004. Bobby never again saw his expensive European buffalo leather
U.S.
passport holder. Bobby bought it in Vienna Austria about 8 or 9 years
ago for a about $50 or $60 dollars and it's still in perfect
condition.
The Japanese immigration authorities swear that they don't have it so
that points to "Peter" and the U.S. embassy. Of course it's a very
"trivial" point but if Bobby stole some ones expensive leather
passport
holder he might go to prison for a while.
Perhaps now that the issue has been brought up "Peter" and the U.S.
embassy will hasten to return the stolen leather passport holder to
Bobby. But perhaps not! O.K.
Let's move on. Anyway, for a moment we forgot that it's completely
"legal" for the Jews to rob and plunder Bobby to their heart's
content.
Immediately after "Peter" left the immigration lock-up dept. the
immigration authorities gave Bobby on behalf of "Peter" a photocopy of
the aforementioned purported letter from the U.S. embassy in Manila to
"Bobby." But it's just a joke of course. This purported 2 pages
letter is from the embassy of the United States of America, Manila,
Philippines dated December 11, 2003 to Robert James Fischer signed by
Theodore Allegra consul of the United States of America. The
purported
letter has no other address! It seems when it comes to the Jews and
the
Jew-controlled U.S. government trying to "screw" Bobby anything goes!
This garbage people (the Jews) have no self-respect. Along with the
letter they gave Bobby the letter's supposed "enclosure" something
called "22 CFR Ch.1(4-1-97 Edition) Department of State" pages 252,
253,
254, 255, 256 and (presumably) 257. The absolute first time Bobby
ever
saw or heard of this supposed letter to him and it's supposed
enclosure
was July 14th 2004. Bobby never ever goes to the Philippine embassy
in
Manila. Bobby doesn't think he's ever been there in his life! But if
he ever did go there at anytime in his life it was surely many decades
ago!!! It's an absolute joke. As a matter of fact and just for the
record Bobby is not in the habit of visiting or calling U.S. embassy
anywhere in the world. Since Bobby left the U.S.A. in about July of
1992 (and he hasn't been back to the U.S.A. since then) the only
embassy
he has visited was the U.S. embassy in Bern, Switzerland. He visited
the Bern embassy on January 24, 1997 to purchase his U.S. Passport No.
Z7792702. He again visited the Bern embassy on or about October 27,
2003 and again on November 6, 2003 to get the aforementioned about 20
page passport insert. That is it. That is his sole contacts with
U.S.
embassy worldwide! The only other exception is a onetime visit in
about
1994 or 1995 to the U.S.A. library reading room in Budapest, Hungary.
Bobby made the visit with Mr. Pal Benko and at Mr. Benko's urging.
However Bobby found the atmosphere these to be so oppressive and scary
(guards, body check, bag check etc.) that he never went there again.
Bobby's attitude has been especially since he was indicted by the U.S.
government on trumped up political charges on December 15, 1992 that
the
less contact with U.S. government officials the better.
The last time Bobby was in the Philippines was around last summer.
Months before this alleged December 11, 2003 alleged letter was
written. Bobby hasn't been back to the Philippines since then. How
in
the world was Bobby ever to receive or even hear about this alleged
letter? Yet supposedly this sick joke of a "letter" is the heart of
the
Dept. of States case for "lifting" and then destroying Bobby's
passport!
The dirty Jews used very similar vicious illegal and criminal tactics
to
in about late 1998 or early 1999 rob and plunder all of Bobby's cash,
valuables and other belongings including his gold and silver coin
collections that he kept in storage at Bekins Moving and Storage
company(Pasadena, California branch). The robbery was committed by
Mr.
Bob Ellsworth, Bekins Moving and Storage company and the United States
government. In terms of monetary value the robbery was one of the
biggest if not the biggest robbery in the history of the United
States!!
But getting back to the matter at hand.
Page 254 of the 22 CFR Ch.1(4-1-97 Edition) Department of State
paragraph 51.75 reads: "Notification of denial or withdrawal of
passport." "Any person whose application for issuance of a passport
has
been denied, or who has otherwise been the subject of an adverse
action
taken on an individual basis with respect to his or her right to
receive
or use a passport shall be entitled to notification in writing of the
adverse action. The notification shall set forth the specific reasons
for the adverse action and the procedures for review available under
paragraphs 51.81 through 51.105." Then continuing to paragraph 51.81
"Time limits on hearing to review adverse action." "A person who has
been the subject of an adverse action with respect to his or her right
to receive or use a passport shall be entitled, upon request made
within
60 days after receipt of notice of such adverse action, to require the
Department or the appropriate Foreign Service post, as the case may
be,
to establish the basis for it's action in a proceeding before a
hearing
officer. If no such request is made within 60 days, the adverse
action
will be considered final and not subject to further administrative
review. If such request is made within 60 days, the adverse action
shall be automatically vacated unless such proceeding is initiated by
the Department or the appropriate Foreign Service post, as the case
may
be, within 60 days after request, or such longer period as is
requested
by the person adversely affected and agreed to by the hearing
officer."
Bobby was never properly notified in writing in the manner prescribed
by
the law that his passport had been revoked. Bobby doesn't have to
prove
that he was never properly notified in writing in the manner
prescribed
for by the law that his passport had been revoked. The U.S.
government
has to prove that Bobby was property notified in writing in the manner
prescribed for by the law that his passport had been revoked. That's
the way the system is supposed to work and everybody knows that.
That's
basic. Bobby challenges the U.S. government to prove that Bobby was
properly notified in writing in the manner prescribed for by the law
that his passport had been revoked. The U.S. government can't do it
because it's not true that Bobby was properly notified in writing in
the
manner prescribed for by the law that his passport had been revoked!
We
all know that the U.S. Government was a huge worldwide spy apparatus.
At last count the U.S. government has some 14 different spy
organizations. So we take this a step further.
We challenge the U.S. government to come up with any hard, genuine
evidence whatsoever that demonstrates that Bobby had ever seen or even
heard about or had any knowledge of any kind about this alleged letter
to him from the U.S. embassy in Manila, Philippines revoking his
passport dated December 11, 2003 and signed by Theodore Allegra Consul
of the United States of America before his forced meeting with "Peter"
of the U.S. embassy in Tokyo on July 14, 2004 in the Narita
International Airport immigration lockup!!! It simply can't be done.
Because Bobby didn't.
In Bobby's opinion there's a real possibility that this infamous
alleged
"letter" to Bobby dated December 11, 2003 from the U.S. embassy in
Manila, Philippines and signed by Theodore Allegra Consul of the
United
States of America was actually cooked up for prompt release in it's
precise final form by the CIA sometime on or after July 6, 2004 the
day
Bobby bought his Japan airlines round-trip ticket to the Philippines
and
made his reservation for flight JL 745 departing July 13, 2004 at
18:20
for Manila, Philippines! You say that can't happen? What world are
you
living in?
The letter was just meant to give the Japanese immigration authorities
a
cheap excuse a pretext a cover however false for cooperating with the
Tokyo U.S. embassy. Then the Japanese immigration authorities "acting
in good faith" and on "reliable information from the Tokyo U.S.
embassy
"Would have an excuse and pretext and a cover (though of course it
still
wouldn't be legal) for illegally canceling Bobby's entrance visa to
Japan of April 15, 2004 and illegally cancelling Bobby's exit visa
from
Japan of July 13, 2004 for illegally arresting Bobby and illegally and
brutally throwing him in the Narita international airport immigration
lockup (and nearly killing him in the process) for illegally turning
Bobby's passport over to the Tokyo U.S. embassy for its illegal
destruction by the Tokyo U.S. embassy and then for illegally forcing
Bobby to meet with "Peter" of the Tokyo U.S. embassy. The final step
for this charade, for this travesty of justice is if all goes
according
to plan is for the Japanese immigration authorities and the U.S.
embassy
in Tokyo to illegally deport Bobby to the U.S.A. where he will face a
kangaroo court on trumped up political charges. Then Bobby will be
convicted, imprisoned, tortured and murdered. Furthermore it is
Bobby's
conviction that the CIA has spread money around in the right places
and
in the right amounts to both the Japanese government and with the
Narita
international airport immigration authority to grease the wheels to
accomplish all of their dastardly plans for Bobby!
All right. As we've explained repeatedly Bobby's passport was never
revoked because it wasn't revoked in a legal manner. End of the
story.
But purely for the sake of arguments let's say that Bobby's passport
had
been revoked by the U.S. government and it had been revoked in a
completely legal and above board manner. Would that then give the
Japanese immigration authorities the right to confiscate Bobby's
passport and turn it over to the U.S. embassy in Tokyo and then for
the
U.S. embassy in Tokyo to physically destroy it??? Absolutely not.
Let's go back to 22 CFR Ch.1(4-1-97 Edition) paragraphs 51.76
"Surrender
of passport" "The bearer of a passport which is revoked shall
surrender
it to the Department or its authorized representative upon demand and
upon his or her refusal to do so such passport may be invalidated by
notifying the bearer in writing of the invalidation."
No strong ?arm tactics allowed by the Department. Unless the bearer
of
the passport voluntarily surrenders his or her passport to the
Department the department has no right to even touch the passport let
alone to physically mutilate or destroy it. That's the law. And you
had better believe that the Department and the Japanese immigration
authorities know it very well. Furthermore, if the Japanese
immigration
authorities truly believed that Bobby had entered and left Japan with
a
revoked passport and they considered that to be a crime then under no
circumstances could they mutilate or destroy the passport because the
passport would be the key evidence of the "crime." And by the same
token how could the Japanese immigration authorities turn over Bobby's
"evidential" passport to the Tokyo U.S. embassy for destruction and
mutilation? By doing so both the Japanese and the U.S. government
have
committed a serious crime.
Bobby is still appealing his arrest for allegedly illegally entering
Japan on April 15, 2004. But even if he wins the appeal so what? His
U.S. passport has already been destroyed by the Japanese and U.S.
government working in collusion! This amounts to pre-judgement of
Bobby's appeal. Finally both the Japanese and U.S. government by
illegally and in collusion destroying Bobby's passport have violated
in
a most brazen way Bobby's constitutional rights. Because the U.S.
constitution says that a person cannot be deprived of his property
without due process of a law!
Bobby has spent most of his time in Japan since January of 2000. He's
made a few good friends and acquaintances here. He's spent hundreds
of
thousands of dollars visiting Japanese "Onsen" (mineral bath). He's
spent over three hundred and fifty thousand dollars working with the
Seiko corporation trying to further develop his high-tech dream chess
clock. He's spent a small fortune on Japanese electronic products and
other Japanese products. But all this is outweighed by one lying
phone
call and one lying letter from the U.S. government. Irregardless of
how
this goes Bobby says "fuck you" to the corrupt Japanese government and
Sayonara to Japan. Even if he lives and ever gets out of jail again
he
will never return to Japan again until every U.S. military base in
Japan
is closed and Japan is a free and independent country again.
I'm closing and in haste a few more words. Bobby swears that prior to
his being detained in the Narita airport by Japanese immigration
officials on about 5:30 p.m. on July 13, 2004. Bobby had never seen
or
heard a word or even a whisper from anyone at anytime anywhere to the
effect that his U.S. passport No. Z7792702 was "revoked" "invalid"
"expired" "cancelled" etc. Absolutely nothing ever, ever, ever. If
anyone says otherwise they are a LIAR. Furthermore, Bobby swears that
prior to his forced involuntary Narita immigration jailhouse meeting
with the Tokyo U.S. embassy man "Peter" on July 14, 2004. Bobby had
never seen or heard of and had no knowledge of any kind whatsoever at
anytime in his entire life of this alleged letter to Bobby dated
December 11, 2003 from the U.S. embassy in Manila, Philippines and
signed by Theodore Allegra Consul of the United States of America.
Bobby had no knowledge of it and never ever saw it or even heard about
prior to July 14, 2004. Never, ever, ever , ever, ever.
If anyone says otherwise they are simply a LIAR. Now, here's
something
to think about if anyone is really interested in truth of this matter.
Bobby arrived in Switzerland (from Japan) in about the middle of
October
2003. Bobby left Switzerland for Japan on December 16, 2003. During
all of this time Bobby never left Switzerland,
not even for a second. When Bobby visited the Bern, Switzerland U.S.
embassy he gave them in writing his swisscom mobile telephone sim card
number in Switzerland. The embassy called Bobby at that number
several
times. They had the number there's no question about that. Except
for
charging the phone's battery occasionally (and for whatever reason it
charges very quickly in Switzerland) that same sim phone number was on
and with a strong signal 24 hours a day! The infamous Allegra letter
to
"Bobby" (ha, ha, ha) was dated December 11, 2003. If the U.S. really
wanted to let Bobby know that his passport was "revoked" why not just
give Bobby a call on his swisscom sim card mobil phone and tell him
all
about it????? The U.S. is so full of shit it's not even funny. No
wonder they're getting their asses kicked in Iraq and Afghanistan!
Japan beware you're backing a loser. Don't go down the drain with the
filthy Jew controlled U.S!
***END ARTICLE***
Topaz
Tiptoeing around Our Problems
By Dr. William Pierce
"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
Topaz
"Rupert Murdoch, the media mogul behind the News Corporation, who had
a
Jewish mother, Elizabeth Green, owns over 60 percent of Australian
newspapers. His acquisitions include: the Adelaide News, the Adelaide
Sunday Mail, the Sydney Daily, the Sydney Sunday Mirror, The
Australian, the Sydney Daily Telegraph, the Sunday Telegraph, the
Melbourne TV station Channel 10, Australian book publisher Angus &
Robertson, the Melbourne Herald, the Weekly Times, and the South China
Morning Post. I am sure I do not have to tell regular listeners what
this media stranglehold means for the suppression of pro-White points
of view in Australia."
Shaun Walker
B'razeer Boobar
wrote:
>
>Tiptoeing around Our Problems
Blame that on political-correctness.
We're negotiationg with Muslims instead of killing them.
Can't negotiate with sub-humans who interpret diplomacy as weakness.
Topaz
wrote:
>
>Blame that on political-correctness.
http://wsi.matriots.com/political_correctness.html
The Racial Origins of Political Correctness
"Political Correctness" (PC) is, of course, the policing or censorship
of certain language and ideas in the White, Western countries. An
example of PC would be the banning of an essay which a Black, Mexican
or female citizen might find "offensive."
It appears that Jewish communist Georg Lukacs (1885-1971; in top photo
at right) probably created the first hands-on, working program in
which PC was used to indoctrinate the citizenry of a White country.
That occurred just a bit before the Jewish-led Frankfurt School began
its own journey towards creating PC ideas with the help of the
School's Max Horkheimer (1895-1973; in bottom photo at right), who was
also a Jew and who invented the concept of "critical theory," which
amounted to criticizing White, Western culture and values (Lukacs
himself was a fringe Frankfurt Schooler). "Critical theory" paved the
way for modern PC by portraying White culture as something oppressive
and foul. Interestingly, "critical theory" borrowed some ideas from
yet another Jew: Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis.
However, sometimes several historical events happen at the same time.
While Lukacs (as commissar of culture in Jewish communist Bela Kun's
Hungarian regime in 1919) was creating a Marxist-based PC program to
indoctrinate Hungarian schoolchildren with using politically left-wing
propaganda, other Jews, such as Franz Boas, were also creating
ideology based wholly or partly on Marxism. Whether their creations
were social, economic, racial or a combination of all three, they were
all rooted in Marxism, or very similarly, egalitarianism/universalism
(i.e., the historically-new idea that all humans and cultures are, or
can be, "equal" in importance, and that White/Western culture is
oppressive and evil). Marxism and egalitarianism/universalism are very
nearly the same thing, except one is based more on economics while the
other is based more on social/cultural matters. (It can be argued that
Marxism was an attempt to use economic ideas to transform the social,
and, by default, racial features of society, so in that sense Marxism
wasn't only economics-based).
But no matter the type of Marxist/universalist programs that those men
created, they all amounted to the same thing: cleverly-disguised
Jewish attacks upon traditional, White culture. Their programs were
designed to end White control of most of the world for the benefit of
the Jewish people. Theirs were racial programs masquerading as mere
political or social movements. Jews instinctively know that movements
that "equalize" the cultures of White countries in one way or another
are good for the Jews, since that equalizing helps to ensure that
nationalist movements cannot rise up and "oppress" the Jews, such as
happened in Nazi Germany in the 1930s. (Note that those disguised
cultural attacks by the Jews often use confusing words and phrases,
and are often made to appear scientific, in order to give the attacks
an air of legitimacy and sophistication).
Marxism, feminism, leftism, egalitarianism, PC - they are all
Jewish-created assaults upon White, Western culture. And they have all
been embraced by many Westerners as legitimate, with few exceptions.
All of those ideas employ "equality" as a main argument and main goal.
All of them are unnatural and universalist, and all require
governmental or bureaucratic force to make the public accept them.
Starting with Karl Marx, and moving on to Sigmund Freud, V. I. Lenin,
Leon Trotsky, Georg Lukacs, Franz Boas, the Frankfurt School
theorists, Ashley Montagu, and Stephen J. Gould, we can see the roots
of the movement(s) that led directly to today's PC movement. All of
those men were racially-Jewish (Lenin was part-Jewish), all held
non-traditional ideas that could be called anti-Western, all were
socially and politically influential, and all played vital roles in
first creating, and then paving the way for the acceptance of, PC.
Even though non-Jews push PC ideas today, they are actually only
unwitting helpers of the Jews who created PC. Without the Jews, it is
very likely that Political Correctness, as we know it today, wouldn't
exist.
>We're negotiationg with Muslims instead of killing them.
>
>Can't negotiate with sub-humans who interpret diplomacy as weakness.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the
Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street
Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review.
He says, "That the American people and their elected representatives
continue to tolerate a war that has killed and maimed thousands of
their own soldiers, destroyed the infrastructure of a country, killed
hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians and created 4 million
refugees for no known reason raises serious questions about the morals
of the American people.
"Is the impotence of the peace movement due to the power of the
Israel Lobby or have Americans become morally degenerate as
commentators increasingly assert? "One indication would be the
response of presidential candidates to the gratuitous and failed war.
What we saw at the Republican presidential candidates' debate on June
5 is inconsistent with the self-esteem of the American people. All of
the leading Republican presidential candidates openly and nonchalantly
endorsed using nuclear weapons against Iran unless Iran abandons its
right to enrich uranium under the non-proliferation treaty, to which
Iran is a signatory (unlike nuclear-armed Israel, India, and US puppet
Pakistan).
"What is moral degeneracy if it is not using nuclear weapons to murder
masses of innocent civilians and spread deadly radioactivity over
vast areas merely in order to force a country to do as we order? If
this isn't barbarism, what is barbarism?
"Do the American people realize that the frontrunners for the
Republican presidential nomination are monsters who want to murder
people who have done us no harm?
"Is the approval lavished on Republican presidential candidates, who
are willing to use nuclear weapons as means of terrorizing Muslim
peoples, an indication that the American people have morphed into
inhuman monsters?
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts06082007.html