Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Boat people 90%+ refugees planes arrivals 60%+
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Dechucka
May 20, 2013, 10:07:17 PM5/20/13
to
Says it all really. The concentration should be on non-boat asylum seekers.
Not to say that the arrival of asylum seekers in boats is a good thing
Not to say that the arrival of asylum seekers in boats is a good thing
HD
May 20, 2013, 11:13:21 PM5/20/13
to
"Dechucka" <Dechu...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:vaadna-4KKN4SwfM...@westnet.com.au...
> Says it all really. The concentration should be on non-boat asylum
> seekers.
>
> Not to say that the arrival of asylum seekers in boats is a good thing
Of course it isn't a good thing.
> seekers.
>
> Not to say that the arrival of asylum seekers in boats is a good thing
Everyone wishes there were less or none.
But demonizing those genuine refugees stinks to high heaven and
turning them back is despicable.
Poof
May 21, 2013, 1:00:02 AM5/21/13
to
On May 21, 1:13 pm, "HD" <her...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> "Dechucka" <Dechuck...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
`The only reason such a large percentage are 'declared' refugees is
that, through the lack of information, a total frustration and the
Government's desire to move the overwhelming number off the records
quickly, they are 'found' to be refugees. Most have not been able to
prove they are refugees but have been given the benefit of the doubt.
That does not make them the' genuine' article and only proves they can
fool the system, and people like you.
> "Dechucka" <Dechuck...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
that, through the lack of information, a total frustration and the
Government's desire to move the overwhelming number off the records
quickly, they are 'found' to be refugees. Most have not been able to
prove they are refugees but have been given the benefit of the doubt.
That does not make them the' genuine' article and only proves they can
fool the system, and people like you.
Dechucka
May 21, 2013, 1:48:16 AM5/21/13
to
b
"Poof" <jmcc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:96c578f2-6f6c-4c15...@d8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...
======================================
whatever conspuiracy theory you want to come up with the boat people are
more genuine than the plane people
"Poof" <jmcc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:96c578f2-6f6c-4c15...@d8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...
whatever conspuiracy theory you want to come up with the boat people are
more genuine than the plane people
Poof
May 21, 2013, 3:36:39 AM5/21/13
to
On May 21, 3:48 pm, "Dechucka" <Dechuck...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> b"Poof" <jmcch...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
WGAF - It is looney logic when you try to justify one wrong with
another. Both methods are wrong, an affront to our laws and need to
be addressed accordingly.
Plane people come with papers , a paper trail and can be accurately
investigated, Boat people come without any papers and a well prepared,
concocted story with which to fool the gullible authorities.
> b"Poof" <jmcch...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
another. Both methods are wrong, an affront to our laws and need to
be addressed accordingly.
Plane people come with papers , a paper trail and can be accurately
investigated, Boat people come without any papers and a well prepared,
concocted story with which to fool the gullible authorities.
Dechucka
May 21, 2013, 4:30:51 AM5/21/13
to
news:ab812d11-4d43-408c...@ks18g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
===============================================
they are not an afront to our law
they are not an afront to our law
Poof
May 21, 2013, 8:24:46 AM5/21/13
to
have set sail from the safe haven of a muslim nation (Indonesia) and
are therefore entering Australia illegally. They are not forced from
Indonesia, but Indonesia doesn't have a Centrelink office.
Those who come by plane and overstay come with a valid documented visa
and a paper trail.
HD
May 21, 2013, 8:34:47 AM5/21/13
to
news:36289d79-aa20-4094...@ua8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
No they are not.
Dechucka
May 21, 2013, 4:13:25 PM5/21/13
to
news:36289d79-aa20-4094...@ua8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
================================
don't let the facts get in your way the majotrity are refugees
Those who come by plane and overstay come with a valid documented visa
and a paper trail.
=======================================
so?
don't let the facts get in your way the majotrity are refugees
Those who come by plane and overstay come with a valid documented visa
and a paper trail.
so?
Poof
May 21, 2013, 4:43:16 PM5/21/13
to
people hide their real identity and their actual status. I thought I
had already explained that but it seems to have - whoosh- gone over
your head.
The facts Chuckles, come from reputable sources, contact I have almost
every day with border protection officers and those in various
Government departments dealing with this issue.
And your mistaken notions come from where exactly.? Feel-good mantra
or a case of the blind leading the blind?
Dechucka
May 21, 2013, 5:08:25 PM5/21/13
to
news:c3244025-3fb6-4469...@k8g2000pbf.googlegroups.com...
=================================
the fact is that the vast majority 90+ of boat arrivals end up with refugee
status. Unlike those who arrive by plane ( except for those who claim
assylum on arrival ) they have not lied or broken the law
the fact is that the vast majority 90+ of boat arrivals end up with refugee
status. Unlike those who arrive by plane ( except for those who claim
assylum on arrival ) they have not lied or broken the law
Poof
May 21, 2013, 9:47:50 PM5/21/13
to
are.
Dechucka
May 21, 2013, 10:01:38 PM5/21/13
to
news:75a826d8-2b62-4eff...@a15g2000pbu.googlegroups.com...
=============================================
thus putting you in the minority
thus putting you in the minority
Clocky
May 21, 2013, 10:36:10 PM5/21/13
to
you just wrote.
Clocky
May 21, 2013, 10:36:59 PM5/21/13
to
bringyagrogalong
May 23, 2013, 5:10:07 AM5/23/13
to
"Dechucka" <Dechuck...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Says it all really. The concentration should be on non-boat asylum seekers.
>
> Not to say that the arrival of asylum seekers in boats is a good thing
The Malaysian Solution would stop arrivals by boat.
>
> Says it all really. The concentration should be on non-boat asylum seekers.
>
> Not to say that the arrival of asylum seekers in boats is a good thing
bringyagrogalong
May 23, 2013, 5:11:56 AM5/23/13
to
by boat because he got into bed with the Greens to vote against the
Malaysian Solution.
Julia...@alp.org.au
May 23, 2013, 7:22:37 AM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 02:10:07 -0700 (PDT) bringyagrogalong stated:-
No guarantee whatsoever.
--
"Labor will lose Senators in every state and the Coalition or a
right-of-centre cross bench will control the Senate after the September
14 elections, a Nielsen poll of the lower house seats indicates.
Labor could be left with 27 Senators, picking up just 14 seats at the
Senate election, according to an analysis of the poll by the Australian
Financial Review.
The average of the House of Representatives primary vote in Nielsen
survey shows swings away from Labor compared to the 2010 election in
every state.
In South Australia the swing is 11.9% with a 5% margin of error. The
next biggest swing was in NSW with 7%, according to the analysis.
"Labor will be demolished in both houses" said Nick Economou, a senior
lecturer in the School of Political and Social Inquiry at Monash
University.
The Coalition looks set to pick up 21 Senate seats, taking its total to
37, two shy of a Senate majority.
"The most likely scenario is a right- leaning cross bench; the second
most likely scenario is a Coalition gaining control" Dr. Economou said.
(snip)
This could leave Labor's Senate representation from July at 22 or 23,
with the Coalition with as many as 39, 12 Greens and three
cross-benches - a new Katter Australia Party plus South Australia
independent Nick Xenephon and Democratic Labor Party Senator John
Madigan."
ROFLMAO!
(Australian Financial Review - 21 May 2013, pp5)
--
"Labor will lose Senators in every state and the Coalition or a
right-of-centre cross bench will control the Senate after the September
14 elections, a Nielsen poll of the lower house seats indicates.
Labor could be left with 27 Senators, picking up just 14 seats at the
Senate election, according to an analysis of the poll by the Australian
Financial Review.
The average of the House of Representatives primary vote in Nielsen
survey shows swings away from Labor compared to the 2010 election in
every state.
In South Australia the swing is 11.9% with a 5% margin of error. The
next biggest swing was in NSW with 7%, according to the analysis.
"Labor will be demolished in both houses" said Nick Economou, a senior
lecturer in the School of Political and Social Inquiry at Monash
University.
The Coalition looks set to pick up 21 Senate seats, taking its total to
37, two shy of a Senate majority.
"The most likely scenario is a right- leaning cross bench; the second
most likely scenario is a Coalition gaining control" Dr. Economou said.
(snip)
This could leave Labor's Senate representation from July at 22 or 23,
with the Coalition with as many as 39, 12 Greens and three
cross-benches - a new Katter Australia Party plus South Australia
independent Nick Xenephon and Democratic Labor Party Senator John
Madigan."
ROFLMAO!
(Australian Financial Review - 21 May 2013, pp5)
Julia...@alp.org.au
May 23, 2013, 7:23:26 AM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 02:11:56 -0700 (PDT) bringnobrainalong, closet
homosexual, pedophile, Emetophiliac, Russian "kozel", "nekulturny" and
"pidar", token uncultured wog and resident buffoon, Liar, Hitler
admirer and Nazi, Russian draft evader and craven coward
<pres...@manloveboy.org> dribbled garbage as usual:
More bullshit from a losing leftie.
homosexual, pedophile, Emetophiliac, Russian "kozel", "nekulturny" and
"pidar", token uncultured wog and resident buffoon, Liar, Hitler
admirer and Nazi, Russian draft evader and craven coward
<pres...@manloveboy.org> dribbled garbage as usual:
0 new messages