-- (DRAFT #7B) PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA AND ITS RATIONALE OF EMPOWERMENT

dolf

unread,

Jun 15, 2022, 5:59:20 AM6/15/22

to

The paradox which DE ZENGOTITA introduces is related to the nature of
mind as the basis of human identity associated to our situational and
time relative capacity for remembrance which he observes as any parent
ought, does vary with each successive generation. [page 33] That I
cannot remember the decades of my parent's era and neither would my
offspring (ie. if I had them) be expected to have any expansive
saturation as knowledge of mine.

"*SING*-H7442: {rânan (H7442): 3 APRIL (CRUCIFIXION 33 AD) [    #256,
    #316,     #322]}, O *BARREN*-H6135: {ʻâqâr (H6135): 13 JANUARY
[    #381]}, THOU THAT DIDST NOT *BEAR*-H3205: {yâlad (H3205): 3 APRIL
(CRUCIFIXION 33 AD) [    #105,     #436], 13 JANUARY [    #116]}; BREAK
FORTH INTO SINGING, AND CRY ALOUD, THOU THAT DIDST NOT *TRAVAIL*-H2342:
{yâlad (H3205): 3 APRIL (CRUCIFIXION 33 AD) [    #448]} WITH CHILD:

FOR MORE ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE *DESOLATE*-H8074: {shâmêm (H8074): 3
APRIL (CRUCIFIXION 33 AD) [    #351,     #436]} THAN THE CHILDREN OF THE
MARRIED *WIFE*-H802: {ʼishshâh (H802): 3 APRIL (CRUCIFIXION 33 AD)
[    #336]}, *SAITH*-H559: {ʼâmar (H559): 3 APRIL (CRUCIFIXION 33 AD)
[    #256]} THE *LORD*-H3068: {Yᵉhôvâh (H3068): 3 APRIL (CRUCIFIXION 33
AD) [    #515]}." [Isaiah 54:1]

And such mantras as "ALWAYS IN OUR THOUGHTS FOREVER IN OUR HEARTS" might
bring a honey salve to the afflicted by strengthening and nourishing it
with some hope as to a prospect of life eternal, but they are
nonetheless deceptive words since with very few exceptions, viable
memory will always dwindle.

There are various criteria of value which can be applied to the worth of
humankind and one such is the measure of their mind. That if the
metaphysical proposition is held to be true, any such mind capacity for
knowledge might then be cohered to experiential NOUMENON clustered
empirical categories that are temporally actuated relative to a ternary
hypostasis as theoretically the basis for a vital consciousness
instantiation.

If our relative knowledge may change and the cushioning hypostasis
reality does not, then ought consideration of the most optimal condition
of our human experience as essentially that which we can bequeath to
others, be framed by an astute awareness of any ONTIC grounding and the
meta-descriptor prototypes requisite for presence of being as a sapient
entity.

Quite unabashedly DE ZENGOTITA states that the nurturing of his
childhood was accompanied by "lame attempts at humour, the habitual
affections and maddening intonation" as its course of nature framing for
his #369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM and impetus of #288 - REMEMBRANCE
(whether as dissonance or resonance) being occasioned by action arising
from a conventional habit as #48 - RITUAL (*LI*) characterised by an
agonising #6 - CONTRARIETY (*LI*) of sincere singleness of heart, an
absence of intelligent inquiry through a spontaneous exercise of #81 -
SOVEREIGN (independent action without external interference)
JUXTAPOSITION as then grounding for bridging the gap of relative
experience, with feigned filial affection exhibiting a lack of #27 -
DUTY (*SHIH*) towards any integrity permeating a sensibility to requital
of loyalty as an implied #68 - RIGHT (*MENG*) [孟 MÈNG: (figuratively)
first in series; (figuratively) great, eminent; to strive; to endeavour
derived from Chinese Confucian 'second sage' philosopher Mèng Kē
(372-289 BC) on human nature is righteous and humane], being instead
pre-occupied with self ego by an amusing puerility: "I used to ask for
stories, just to get away from them.

The thing about stories being that, when they told them, they weren't
addressing me directly; they would get lost in the telling, musing on
their lives--much more comfortable all around.

Looking back, I now realise that the stories they told could have
happened anytime, that the focus was always on people and events, never
on atmosphere, style, cultural texture. There was no period feeling.

Once in a while, they would say something like ["not many people had
cars", "refrigerators weren't electric" or "the iceman cometh" (ie. not
the Broadway play premiered on 9 October 1946) that as dissonance]
certainly had an effect." [page 34]

TO BE CONTINUED ...

On 12/6/2022 21:44, dolf wrote:
> -- (DRAFT) PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA AND ITS RATIONALE OF EMPOWERMENT
>
> (c) 2022 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 12 June 2022
>
> Before we consider DE ZENGOTITA's next chapter on "THE CULT OF THE
> CHILD" as comprising some 50 pages in not being an academic treatise
> we ought to again express the cautionary caveat that neither is ours.
> The aggregating of our various contemplations into chapters as then a
> digestation of his book thus far, is primarily concerned with devising
> a META-NARRATIVE so as to articulate any viability to a METALOGIC
> process and such is then augmented with relative textual notes to
> further contextually assist any comprehensibility as informal research.
>
> [snipped for context]
> TO BE CONTINUED ...
>
> A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Empowerment.pdf>
>
> Initial Post: 1 June 2022
>
--
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[S|T]
as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)

dolf

unread,

Jun 15, 2022, 8:14:02 AM6/15/22

to

The #73 - COMPLETION (*CH'ENG*) of this superficial life process as
immersive interoperability into the metarealistic (ie. not only the
pictorial aspect of the perception of other dimensions of reality, but
also the essence of those dimensions and their relation to us as human
beings) nostalgic realms of past persons who are still "exist[ing] in
their own timeless universe [as often epitomised within] really jerky
black-and-white films" is for DE ZENGOTITA a despairing realisation
where existence is constituted by a #215 - SELF CONTRADICTION comprising
of little more than memorabilia (ie. things that might be remarkable and
potentially worthy of #288 - REMEMBRANCE) fragments within your
possession, as just a little heap of them arrayed at random, but having
no coherent context.

Rather than conceiving that an ONTIC grounding is requisite for the
circumscribing of ontological experience, the possible need of
conformity to meta-principles (eg: propositional dialetic of information
enquiry and optimal response: dialektikós [Greek: διαλεκτικός] #463
[@137] - DESIRE TO SEEK THE GOOD AS PROSPEROUS OF MAN'S SENSUOUS NATURE
AND UNDERSTANDING OF MAN'S INTELLECTUAL NATURE / #265 [@202] - TO CHOOSE
OR CREATE, SHAPE, FORM OF NEW CONDITIONS, CIRCUMSTANCES OF
TRANSFORMATIONS) and the necessity of meta-descriptor prototypes which
are essential for a vital and continuing presence of being, the viable
solution to any inevitability of an existential crisis relative to the
hypostasis reality, is to validate the "whole cultural trajectory, it's
preservation and capacity to be continuously recycled" by a permissive
"IF IT FEELS GOOD (THEN IT MUST BE)" process of promiscuous (ie.
arbitrary conventions and collocations relative to time) selection where
"mix" is the imperative: "Make your own--anything. Out of anything ...
[as a] collapse into a synchronic pastiche." [page 35]

dolf

unread,

Jun 15, 2022, 4:30:09 PM6/15/22

to

A plausible ONTIC outcome to our spontaneous propositional METALOGIC
consideration of a possible viable arbitrator to any propositional dialetic
of information enquiry and optimal response (as an avenue of enquiry for
further research) is a capability which is sustained by a realisation that
the only NOUMENON entry [zen: 9, row: 5, col: 6, nous: #61] purveying an
intersection of categories #463 / #265 as being referenced by the
GRAPPLE@[#66, #33, #15, #78, #73, #54, #68, #15, #61] PROTOTYPE:

MALE: @84 + @169 = #253
FEME: @192 = #192
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #445

The logical conclusion is that #445 - SELF CONTROL as virtue in the mastery
of one's #360 - páthos (G3806) ought to be a requisite outcome for any
mechanised permissive process of promiscuous selection:

#445 as [#5, #3, #20, #100, #1, #300, #5, #10, #1] = enkráteia (G1466):
{UMBRA: #445 % #41 = #35} 1) self-control (the virtue of one who masters
his desires and passions, esp. his sensual appetites);

G1466@{
   @1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#5),
   @2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#13); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#8),
   @3: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#41); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#28),
   @4: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#88); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#47),
   @5: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#136); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#48),
   @6: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#160); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#105),
   @7: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#189); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#110),
   @8: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES
{%40}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#120),
   @9: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#268); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#121),
   Male: #268; Feme: #121
} // #445

dolf

unread,

Jun 15, 2022, 5:45:08 PM6/15/22

to

The paradox which DE ZENGOTITA introduces is related to the nature of
mind as the basis of human identity associated to our situational and
time relative capacity for remembrance which he observes as any parent
ought, does vary with each successive generation. [page 33] That I
cannot remember the decades of my parent's era and neither would my

offspring (ie. hypothetical as an obscure potential since I've had
chemotherapy) be expected to have any expansive saturation as a

A plausible ONTIC outcome to our spontaneous propositional METALOGIC

consideration of a possible viable arbitrator to any propositional
dialetic of information enquiry and optimal response (ie. as an avenue
of enquiry for further research) is a promising capability which is

sustained by a realisation that the only NOUMENON entry [zen: 9, row: 5,
col: 6, nous: #61] purveying an intersection of categories #463 / #265

to dialektikós [Greek: διαλεκτικός] as being referenced by the

GRAPPLE@[#66, #33, #15, #78, #73, #54, #68, #15, #61] PROTOTYPE:

MALE: @84 + @169 = #253
FEME: @192 = #192
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #445

Is the logical conclusion that #445 - SELF CONTROL as virtue in the

mastery of one's #360 - páthos (G3806) ought to be a requisite outcome
for any mechanised permissive process of promiscuous selection:

"*MEEKNESS*-G4236:, *TEMPERANCE*-G1466:

#759 as [#80, #100, #1, #70, #300, #8, #200] = praiótēs (G4236): {UMBRA:
#759 % #41 = #21} 1) gentleness, mildness, meekness;

#445 as [#5, #3, #20, #100, #1, #300, #5, #10, #1] = enkráteia (G1466):

{UMBRA: #445 % #41 = #35} 1) *SELF*-*CONTROL* (the virtue of one who

masters his desires and passions, esp. his sensual appetites);

    #322 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *CRUCIFIXION* OF JESUS ON 3
APRIL 33 AD as [#20, #1, #300, #1] = katá (G2596): {UMBRA: #322 % #41 =
#35} 1) down from, through out; 2) according to, toward, along;

*AGAINST*-G2596: SUCH THERE IS NO LAW." [Galatians 5:23]

That MEEKNESS here is not WEAKNESS but strong, bold, confident and
assertive given the word is derived from the Greek origin, praus, which
is translated as "*STRENGTH* *UNDER* *CONTROL*." In ancient Greece, war
horses were trained to be meek -- strong and powerful yet under control
and willing to submit.

Aristotle said that the praus person is one who has the virtue of the
mean between two extremes. If recklessness were on one end and cowardice
on the other, praus might be characterized as steady courage. For
example, a meek person doesn’t shy away from taking a stand. Rather, the
stand is taken at the right time, with the right people, in the right
way. He or she submits or constrains power for greater effect on self
and others. [@1]

To Xenophon, enkrateia is not a particular virtue but "the foundation of
all virtues".

"SO *MIGHTILY*-G2596-G2904: GREW THE *WORD*-G3056:

    #436 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *CRUCIFIXION* OF JESUS ON 3
APRIL 33 AD as [#20, #100, #1, #300, #5, #10] = krátos (G2904): {UMBRA:
#691 % #41 = #35} 1) force, strength; 2) power, might: mighty with great
power; 2a) a mighty deed, a work of power; 3) dominion;

    #223 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *PENTECOST* OF JESUS ON 24 MAY
33 ADas [#30, #70, #3, #70, #50] /
    #373 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* FOR 13 JANUARY as [#30, #70, #3, #70,
#200] = lógos (G3056): {UMBRA: #373 % #41 = #4} 1) of speech; 1a) a
word, uttered by a living voice, embodies a conception or idea; 1b) what
someone has said; 1b1) a word; 1b2) the sayings of God; 1b3) decree,
mandate or order; 1b4) of the moral precepts given by God; 1b5) Old
Testament prophecy given by the prophets; 1b6) what is declared, a
thought, declaration, aphorism, a weighty saying, a dictum, a maxim; 1c)
discourse; 1c1) the act of speaking, speech; 1c2) the faculty of speech,
skill and practice in speaking; 1c3) a kind or style of speaking; 1c4) a
continuous speaking discourse - instruction; 1d) doctrine, teaching; 1e)
anything reported in speech; a narration, narrative; 1f) matter under
discussion, thing spoken of, affair, a matter in dispute, case, suit at
law; 1g) the thing spoken of or talked about; event, deed; 2) its use as
respect to the MIND alone; 2a) reason, the mental faculty of thinking,
meditating, reasoning, calculating; 2b) account, i.e. regard,
consideration; 2c) account, i.e. reckoning, score; 2d) account, i.e.
answer or explanation in reference to judgment; 2e) relation, i.e. with
whom as judge we stand in relation; 2e1) reason would; 2f) reason,
cause, ground; 3) In John, denotes the essential Word of God, *JESUS*
*CHRIST*, *THE* *PERSONAL* *WISDOM* *AND* *POWER* *IN* *UNION* *WITH*
*GOD*, *HIS* *MINISTER* *IN* *CREATION* *AND* *GOVERNMENT* *OF* *THE*
*UNIVERSE*, *THE* *CAUSE* *OF* *ALL* *THE* *WORLD'S* *LIFE* *BOTH*
*PHYSICAL* *AND* *ETHICAL*, which for the procurement of man's salvation
put on human nature in the person of Jesus the Messiah, the second
person in the Godhead, and shone forth conspicuously from His words and
deeds.;

OF GOD AND PREVAILED." [Acts 19:20]

The Word Enkrateia (Greek ἐγκράτεια, "in power" is derived from ἐν (en,
“in”) + κράτος (krátos, “power”). Enkrateia comes from the adjective
enkratês (ἐγκρατής from ἐν (en, “in”) which means possession, power over
something or someone else + κράτος (krátos, “power”)). It results in the
meaning of power over yourself, power over your own passions and
instincts, self-control and self-mastery.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #445 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;

THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
I am not one who curseth the king.

    #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
    #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
    #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
    #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
    #CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
   @1: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35); Ego: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35),
   @2: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#64); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#110),
   @3: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#100); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#117),
   @4: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#119); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN
(#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM
NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181

G1466@{
   @1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#5),
   @2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#13); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#8),
   @3: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#41); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#28),
   @4: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#88); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#47),
   @5: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#136); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#48),
   @6: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#160); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#105),
   @7: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#189); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#110),
   @8: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES
{%40}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#120),
   @9: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#268); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#121),
   Male: #268; Feme: #121
} // #445

For Aristotle, enkrateia is the antonym of akrasia (ἀκρασία from ἀ =
without + κράτος = power, control) which means "lacking command (over
oneself)". In this sense, enkrateia is the state of performing what is
known to be a positive choice because of its positive consequences as
opposed to akrasia, which is the state of performing what is known to be
not a positive choice (because of its negative consequences), but
nevertheless performing it because of its immediate pleasures. [ref:
Wikipedia : Enkrateia]

TO BE CONTINUED ...

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Empowerment.pdf>

@1 - Matt Norman Blog dated 6 February 2018, STRENGTH UNDER CONTROL: HOW
TO LEAD LIKE A MEEK WAR HORSE, <https://www.mattnorman.com/meek/>

dolf

unread,

Jun 15, 2022, 7:16:34 PM6/15/22

to

"TELL YE THE DAUGHTER OF SION, BEHOLD, THY KING COMETH UNTO THEE,
MEEK-G4239,

#781 as [#80, #100, #1, #400, #200] = praÿs (G4239): {UMBRA: #781 % #41
= #2} 1) mildness of disposition, gentleness of spirit, meekness;

AND SITTING UPON AN ASS, AND A COLT THE FOAL OF AN ASS." [Matthew 21:5]

Aristotle said that the praus person is one who has the virtue of the
mean between two extremes. If recklessness were on one end and cowardice
on the other, praus might be characterized as steady courage. For
example, a meek person doesn’t shy away from taking a stand. Rather, the
stand is taken at the right time, with the right people, in the right
way. He or she submits or constrains power for greater effect on self

and others. [@2]

To Xenophon, enkrateia is not a particular virtue but "the foundation of
all virtues".

"SO *MIGHTILY*-G2596-G2904: GREW THE *WORD*-G3056:

#436 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *CRUCIFIXION* OF JESUS ON 3
APRIL 33 AD as [#20, #100, #1, #300, #5, #10] = krátos (G2904): {UMBRA:
#691 % #41 = #35} 1) force, strength; 2) power, might: mighty with great
power; 2a) a mighty deed, a work of power; 3) dominion;

#223 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *PENTECOST* ON 24 MAY 33 AD as

deeds;

OF GOD AND PREVAILED." [Acts 19:20]

The Word Enkrateia (Greek ἐγκράτεια, "in power" is derived from ἐν (en,
“in”) + κράτος (krátos, “power”). Enkrateia comes from the adjective
enkratês (ἐγκρατής from ἐν (en, “in”) which means possession, power over

something or someone else + κράτος (krátos, “power”)):

κρᾰ́τος (krátos)
- might, strength
- act of strength, act of valour
- (in the plural) acts of violence
- dominion, power

It results in the meaning of power over yourself, power over your own
passions and instincts, self-control and self-mastery.

Whereas the theory of ego depletion (ie: utilitarian probability for the
impetus of action as to whether the ONTIC discrete meta-descriptor
prototypes have any more or less fluctuation as for example whether #68
- MENG means DIMMING or RIGHT), attempts to describe the state of an
individual's impaired ability to self-regulate that can be implicated in
a wide range of undesirable and maladaptive behaviours, such as acts of
aggression. Knowledge and strategies to counteract ego depletion would
therefore, be highly beneficial in various real-life situations.

dolf

unread,

Jun 15, 2022, 7:20:39 PM6/15/22

to

On 16/6/2022 07:42, dolf wrote:

"TELL YE THE DAUGHTER OF SION, BEHOLD, THY KING COMETH UNTO THEE,
MEEK-G4239,

#781 as [#80, #100, #1, #400, #200] = praÿs (G4239): {UMBRA: #781 % #41
= #2} 1) mildness of disposition, gentleness of spirit, meekness;

AND SITTING UPON AN ASS, AND A COLT THE FOAL OF AN ASS." [Matthew 21:5]

Aristotle said that the praus person is one who has the virtue of the
mean between two extremes. If recklessness were on one end and cowardice
on the other, praus might be characterized as steady courage. For
example, a meek person doesn’t shy away from taking a stand. Rather, the
stand is taken at the right time, with the right people, in the right
way. He or she submits or constrains power for greater effect on self

and others. [@2]

To Xenophon, enkrateia is not a particular virtue but "the foundation of
all virtues".

"SO *MIGHTILY*-G2596-G2904: GREW THE *WORD*-G3056:

#436 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *CRUCIFIXION* OF JESUS ON 3
APRIL 33 AD as [#20, #100, #1, #300, #5, #10] = krátos (G2904): {UMBRA:
#691 % #41 = #35} 1) force, strength; 2) power, might: mighty with great
power; 2a) a mighty deed, a work of power; 3) dominion;

#223 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *PENTECOST* ON 24 MAY 33 AD as

deeds;

OF GOD AND PREVAILED." [Acts 19:20]

The Word Enkrateia (Greek ἐγκράτεια, "in power" is derived from ἐν (en,
“in”) + κράτος (krátos, “power”). Enkrateia comes from the adjective
enkratês (ἐγκρατής from ἐν (en, “in”) which means possession, power over

something or someone else + κράτος (krátos, “power”)):

κρᾰ́τος (krátos)
- might, strength
- act of strength, act of valour
- (in the plural) acts of violence
- dominion, power

It results in the meaning of power over yourself, power over your own
passions and instincts, self-control and self-mastery.

Whereas the theory of ego depletion (ie: utilitarian probability for the
impetus of action as to whether the ONTIC discrete meta-descriptor
prototypes have any more or less fluctuation as for example whether #68
- MENG means DIMMING or RIGHT), attempts to describe the state of an
individual's impaired ability to self-regulate that can be implicated in
a wide range of undesirable and maladaptive behaviours, such as acts of
aggression. Knowledge and strategies to counteract ego depletion would
therefore, be highly beneficial in various real-life situations.

A depleting task requiring self-control can have a hindering effect on a
subsequent self-control task, even if the tasks are seemingly unrelated.
Self-control plays a valuable role in the functioning of the self on
both individualistic and interpersonal levels. Ego depletion is
therefore a critical topic in experimental psychology, specifically
social psychology, because it is a mechanism that contributes to the
understanding of the processes of human self-control. [Ref: Wikipedia :
Ego_depletion]

dolf

unread,

Jun 16, 2022, 5:38:13 PM6/16/22

to

where existence is constituted by a #215 - *SELF* *CONTRADICTION*

comprising of little more than memorabilia (ie. things that might be
remarkable and potentially worthy of #288 - REMEMBRANCE) fragments
within your possession, as just a little heap of them arrayed at random,
but having no coherent context.

Rather than conceiving that an ONTIC grounding is requisite for the
circumscribing of ontological experience, the possible need of

conformity to meta-principles (eg: propositional dialectic of

information enquiry and optimal response: dialektikós [Greek:
διαλεκτικός] #463 [@137] - DESIRE TO SEEK THE GOOD AS PROSPEROUS OF
MAN'S SENSUOUS NATURE AND UNDERSTANDING OF MAN'S INTELLECTUAL NATURE /
#265 [@202] - TO CHOOSE OR CREATE, SHAPE, FORM OF NEW CONDITIONS,
CIRCUMSTANCES OF TRANSFORMATIONS) and the necessity of meta-descriptor
prototypes which are essential for a vital and continuing presence of
being, the viable solution to any inevitability of an existential crisis
relative to the hypostasis reality, is to validate the "whole cultural
trajectory, it's preservation and capacity to be continuously recycled"
by a permissive "IF IT FEELS GOOD (THEN IT MUST BE)" process of
promiscuous (ie. arbitrary conventions and collocations relative to
time) selection where "mix" is the imperative: "Make your own--anything.
Out of anything ... [as a] collapse into a synchronic pastiche. [page 35]

And whilst nostalgic dreaming as preoccupied enjoyment might stupefy any
prospect of iconoclasm, but just how long will this pathological
unaccountable hedonism (ie. pleasure of the entire mind and not just the
senses as the highest good) continuity go on?

"FOR WE OURSELVES ALSO WERE SOMETIMES *FOOLISH* {anóētos (G453): 3 APRIL
(CRUCIFIXION 33 AD) [    #509 - *YAHAD*]}, *DISOBEDIENT* {apeithḗs
(G545): 13 JANUARY [    #313]}, *DECEIVED* {planáō (G4105): 24 MAY
(PENTECOST 33 AD) [    #382]}, SERVING DIVERS LUSTS AND *PLEASURES*-G2237,

#140 - AN *INNATE* *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTED* *CONCEPT* as [#8, #4, #70, #50,
#8] /
#343 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA as [#8, #4, #70, #50, #1, #10, #200]
= hēdonḗ (G2237): {UMBRA: #140 % #41 = #17} 1) pleasure; 2) *DESIRES*
*FOR* *PLEASURE*;

G2237@{
   @1: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#8); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#8),
   @2: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#20); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#12),
   @3: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#21); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#82),
   @4: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#72); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING:
T'ANG (#132),
   @5: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#131); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#140 -
I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
   Male: #131 - *TRUE*; Feme: #140
} // #140

LIVING IN MALICE AND ENVY, HATEFUL, AND *HATING* {miséō (G3404): 24 MAY
(PENTECOST 33 AD) [    #315, #268 - *SUPERNAL* *NOUMENON* *CUSHIONING*
*FOR* *SELF* *CONTROL*]} ONE ANOTHER." [Titus 3:3]

IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON SECTION #53 - INCREASING
EVIDENCE, GAINING INSIGHT; I-CHING: H13 - FELLOWSHIP, COMPANIONSHIP,
CONCORDING PEOPLE, FELLOWSHIP WITH MEN, GATHERING MEN; TETRA: 53 -
ETERNITY (YUNG) AS IDEA @343: "In the first (mathematical) class of
antinomy (ie. a contradiction between two beliefs or conclusions that
are in themselves reasonable but a paradox), the falsity of the
presupposition consisted in the following: that something #215 -
*SELF*-*CONTRADICTORY* (namely, appearance as a thing in itself) would
be represented as being *UNIFIABLE* *IN* *A* *CONCEPT*.

But regarding the second, namely the dynamical, class of antinomy, the
falsity of the presupposition consists in this: *THAT* *SOMETHING*
*THAT* *IS* *UNIFIABLE* *IS* REPRESENTED* *AS* *CONTRADICTORY*;
consequently, while in the first case both of the mutually opposing
assertions were false, here on the contrary the assertions, which are
set in opposition to one another through mere misunderstanding, can both
be #131 - *TRUE*.

#131 as [#1, #40, #50, #40] = ʼomnâm (H551): {UMBRA: #131 % #41 = #8} 1)
verily, *TRULY*, surely;

Specifically, mathematical *COMBINATION* *NECESSARILY* *PRESUPPOSES*
*THE* *HOMOGENEITY* *OF* *THE* *THINGS* *COMBINED* (in the concept of
magnitude), but dynamical connection does not require this at all. If it
is a question of the magnitude of something extended, all parts must be
homogeneous among themselves and with the whole; in contrast, in the
connection of cause and effect homogeneity can indeed be found, but is
not necessary; for the concept of causality (whereby through one thing,
something completely different from it is posited) at least does not
require it.

If the objects of the sensible world were taken for things in
themselves, and the previously stated natural laws for laws of things in
them- selves, contradiction would be inevitable. In the same way, if the
subject of freedom were represented, like the other objects, as a mere
appearance, contradiction could again not be avoided, for the same thing
would be simultaneously affirmed and denied of the same object in the
same sense.

But if natural necessity is referred only to appearances and freedom
only to things in themselves, then no contradiction arises if both kinds
of causality are assumed or conceded equally, however difficult or
impossible it may be to make causality of the latter kind conceivable."
[pages 94, 95]

A plausible ONTIC outcome to our spontaneous propositional METALOGIC

consideration of a possible viable arbitrator to any dialectic of

information enquiry and optimal response (ie. as an avenue of enquiry

for further research) is a promising capability sustained by a

realisation that the only NOUMENON entry [zen: 9, row: 5, col: 6, nous:
#61] purveying an intersection of categories #463 / #265 to dialektikós
[Greek: διαλεκτικός] as being referenced by the GRAPPLE@[#66, #33, #15,
#78, #73, #54, #68, #15, #61] PROTOTYPE:

MALE: @84 + @169 = #253
FEME: @192 = #192
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #445

As convoluted as this may seem, then gives rise to the logical
conclusion that #445 - SELF CONTROL being a virtue in the mastery of

one's #360 - páthos (G3806) ought to be a requisite outcome for any
mechanised permissive process of promiscuous selection:

"*MEEKNESS*-G4236:, *TEMPERANCE*-G1466:

#759 as [#80, #100, #1, #70, #300, #8, #200] = praiótēs (G4236): {UMBRA:
#759 % #41 = #21} 1) gentleness, mildness, meekness;

#445 as [#5, #3, #20, #100, #1, #300, #5, #10, #1] = enkráteia (G1466):
{UMBRA: #445 % #41 = #35} 1) *SELF*-*CONTROL* (the virtue of one who
masters his desires and passions, esp. his sensual appetites);

#322 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *CRUCIFIXION* OF JESUS ON 3
APRIL 33 AD as [#20, #1, #300, #1] = katá (G2596): {UMBRA: #322 % #41 =
#35} 1) down from, through out; 2) according to, toward, along;

*AGAINST*-G2596: SUCH THERE IS NO LAW." [Galatians 5:23]

That MEEKNESS here is not WEAKNESS but strong, bold, confident and
assertive given the word is derived from the Greek origin, praus, which
is translated as "*STRENGTH* *UNDER* *CONTROL*." In ancient Greece, war
horses were trained to be meek -- strong and powerful yet under control
and willing to submit.

"TELL YE THE DAUGHTER OF SION, BEHOLD, THY KING COMETH UNTO THEE,
MEEK-G4239,

#781 as [#80, #100, #1, #400, #200] = praÿs (G4239): {UMBRA: #781 % #41
= #2} 1) mildness of disposition, gentleness of spirit, meekness;

AND SITTING UPON AN ASS, AND A COLT THE FOAL OF AN ASS." [Matthew 21:5]

Aristotle said that the praus person is one who has the virtue of the
mean between two extremes. If recklessness were on one end and cowardice
on the other, praus might be characterized as steady courage. For
example, a meek person doesn’t shy away from taking a stand. Rather, the
stand is taken at the right time, with the right people, in the right
way. He or she submits or constrains power for greater effect on self

and others. [@2]

To Xenophon, enkrateia is not a particular virtue but "the foundation of
all virtues".

"SO *MIGHTILY*-G2596-G2904: GREW THE *WORD*-G3056:

#436 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *CRUCIFIXION* OF JESUS ON 3
APRIL 33 AD as [#20, #100, #1, #300, #5, #10] = krátos (G2904): {UMBRA:
#691 % #41 = #35} 1) force, strength; 2) power, might: mighty with great
power; 2a) a mighty deed, a work of power; 3) dominion;

#223 - *NOUMENON* *RESONANCE* *FOR* *PENTECOST* ON 24 MAY 33 AD as

deeds;

OF GOD AND PREVAILED." [Acts 19:20]

The Word Enkrateia (Greek ἐγκράτεια, "in power" is derived from ἐν (en,
“in”) + κράτος (krátos, “power”). Enkrateia comes from the adjective
enkratês (ἐγκρατής from ἐν (en, “in”) which means possession, power over

something or someone else + κράτος (krátos, “power”)):

κρᾰ́τος (krátos)
- might, strength
- act of strength, act of valour
- (in the plural) acts of violence
- dominion, power

It results in the meaning of power over yourself, power over your own
passions and instincts, self-control and self-mastery.

Whereas the theory of ego depletion (ie: utilitarian probability for the
impetus of action as to whether the ONTIC discrete meta-descriptor
prototypes have any more or less fluctuation as for example whether #68
- MENG means DIMMING or RIGHT), attempts to describe the state of an
individual's impaired ability to self-regulate that can be implicated in
a wide range of undesirable and maladaptive behaviours, such as acts of
aggression.

A depleting task requiring self-control can have a hindering effect on a
subsequent self-control task, even if the tasks are seemingly unrelated.
Self-control plays a valuable role in the functioning of the self on
both individualistic and interpersonal levels. Ego depletion is
therefore a critical topic in experimental psychology, specifically
social psychology, because it is a mechanism that contributes to the

understanding of the processes of human self-control. Knowledge and

strategies to counteract ego depletion would therefore, be highly

beneficial in various real-life situations. [Ref: Wikipedia : Ego_depletion]

@2 - Matt Norman Blog dated 6 February 2018, STRENGTH UNDER CONTROL: HOW

TO LEAD LIKE A MEEK WAR HORSE, <https://www.mattnorman.com/meek/>

Initial Post: 1 June 2022

On 16/6/2022 07:42, dolf wrote:

dolf

unread,

Jun 16, 2022, 5:45:12 PM6/16/22

to

CORRECTION: And whilst nostalgic dreaming as preoccupied enjoyment might
generally stupefy any prospect of iconoclasm (ie. the action of
attacking or assertively rejecting cherished beliefs and institutions or
established values and practices), but just how long will this

pathological unaccountable hedonism (ie. pleasure of the entire mind and
not just the senses as the highest good) continuity go on?

where existence is constituted by a #215 - *SELF* *CONTRADICTION*

comprising of little more than memorabilia (ie. things that might be
remarkable and potentially worthy of #288 - REMEMBRANCE) fragments
within your possession, as just a little heap of them arrayed at random,
but having no coherent context.

Rather than conceiving that an ONTIC grounding is requisite for the
circumscribing of ontological experience, the possible need of

conformity to meta-principles (eg: propositional dialectic of

information enquiry and optimal response: dialektikós [Greek:
διαλεκτικός] #463 [@137] - DESIRE TO SEEK THE GOOD AS PROSPEROUS OF
MAN'S SENSUOUS NATURE AND UNDERSTANDING OF MAN'S INTELLECTUAL NATURE /
#265 [@202] - TO CHOOSE OR CREATE, SHAPE, FORM OF NEW CONDITIONS,
CIRCUMSTANCES OF TRANSFORMATIONS) and the necessity of meta-descriptor
prototypes which are essential for a vital and continuing presence of
being, the viable solution to any inevitability of an existential crisis
relative to the hypostasis reality, is to validate the "whole cultural
trajectory, it's preservation and capacity to be continuously recycled"
by a permissive "IF IT FEELS GOOD (THEN IT MUST BE)" process of
promiscuous (ie. arbitrary conventions and collocations relative to
time) selection where "mix" is the imperative: "Make your own--anything.
Out of anything ... [as a] collapse into a synchronic pastiche. [page 35]

And whilst nostalgic dreaming as preoccupied enjoyment might generally
stupefy any prospect of iconoclasm (ie. the action of attacking or
assertively rejecting cherished beliefs and institutions or established
values and practices), but just how long will this pathological