Fair dinkum
Serge
I hope you enjoyed your visit to Australia. It was amusing to hear you use
that great Aussie term "fair dinkum", a term that has fallen out of common
use lately, for reasons that I am sure you will understand. I fear you may
have been somewhat misled as to its meaning, because you equated it with the
Texan term, "man of steel".
This is a description that we in Australia understand very well, and it does
suit Mr. Howard. He is rigid and uncompromising, cold and hard, highly
polished but still dull somehow.
"Fair dinkum" means something very different. It means true and honest,
trustworthy and sincere.
I hope you can see your mistake.
- Jo-Anne Lentern (SMH 25 Oct 2030)
Couldn't have put it better myself Jo-Anne
Quentin Burward
Serge at <serg...@one.net.au> says:
> Dear Mr. Bush,
>
> I hope you enjoyed your visit to Australia. It was amusing to hear you use
> that great Aussie term "fair dinkum", a term that has fallen out of common
> use lately, for reasons that I am sure you will understand. I fear you may
> have been somewhat misled as to its meaning, because you equated it with the
> Texan term, "man of steel".
I don't know whether anyone else has mentioned the possibility, but our
president's bestowal of that sobriquet on our prime minister may have been
inspired by the Russian meaning of the name that was adopted by the man who
was born Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili.
> [. . .]
--
Quentin Burward.
tipper
"Quentin Burward" <que...@burward.com> wrote in message
news:BBC1579F.1800A%que...@burward.com...
Yeah, thought about it, but rejected the comparision.
Stalin murdered his opponents, Howard is more like Superman.
He's faster than a speeding bullet. He's more powerful than a locomotive.
He's able to leap tall buildings at a single bound.
I mean, two of the most powerful leader come visiting, on two consequtive
days.
Not even Superman could pull that off.
--
Cruel and criminal laws in Turkey have been fixed for more than five hundred
years on the rules and theories of an old Arab sheik, and through the
abusive interpretation of ignorant and filthy priests....Islam, this absurd
theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotten corpse which poisons our lives"
Kemal Ataturk, founder of modern Turkey.
>
>
Thomas Jerome Newton
What a clever wit. Give the boy a silver star for his effort.
Thomas Jerome Newton
wrote:
Let's not forget that Uncle Joe was another product, and long time
hero, of the Left. He was only disowned when they couldn't cover up
the atrocities any longer, as with all heroes of the rabid Left.
Ernest
No can do he wants a red star.
TheMan
"Thomas Jerome Newton" <t...@KILLsubdimensionSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:k5bmpvgi94shv41vj...@4ax.com...
Look who's licking Chinese Commie arse now... unbelievably. We were warned
about the Reds under the bed, I think I just found you out.
-TheMan-
TheMan
"Ernest" <deadl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9qdmpv8vqpr5dg64f...@4ax.com...
So he can be like Howard? Howard says he supports China's
"reunification"(takeover) of Taiwan.
Instead of Reds under the bed, the new warning should be Reds in Bed with
our government.
-TheMan-
k...@kymhorsell.com
[...]
> "Fair dinkum" means something very different. It means true and honest,
> trustworthy and sincere.
In the dim mists of Australia's working-class past -- long since forgotten
as the hurley-burley of running from the coffee shop to the gym and
back again to pick up the 1.3 kids -- it meant
"a fair day's pay for (a day's) work".
"Dinkum" was at some point POME slang for "work".
Ms Kitty
top job...but I bet you're taking advantage of this country's economic
stability...
"Serge" <serg...@one.net.au> wrote in message
news:2eDmb.518$Lx5....@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
Serge
"Ms Kitty" <walnu...@yahoo.co.uk> waffled in message
news:O5Omb.166034$bo1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> quick to criticise the PM are we?...so who are you? I don't see you in the
> top job...but I bet you're taking advantage of this country's economic
> stability...
You call that criticism?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS is criticism . . .
Yes I know Howard's been the most divisive Prime Minister in
Australian history. Yes it is true that he drove the Aussie dollar
down to below US50c which allowed overseas interests to buy
up most of this country. Yes he has privatised every government
utility that wasn't nailed down in order to "showcase" a budget
surplus, even though our asset cupboard is now bare. Yes I'm
aware that he plays the race card whenever he's up for
re-election. True, he is a poor judge of character, vis-a-vis Peter
Hollingworth. Yes, I agree that he's all but destroyed Higher
Education, which will make us the white trash of Asia in years
to come. Yes, Howard is a consummate liar and has no equal in
that regard in Australian political history, re. core and non-core
promises, Manildra, WMD, children overboard and children
having their lips sewn together by subhuman wop parents etc.
Yes, he did join the US in an illegal war on Iraq for short term
political gain thereby making us a target for terrorist attack, not
to mention the growing enmity from our near neighbors. Yes, his
government is the highest taxing in our history, with increased
federal taxes up by a whopping 25% in real terms. True, during
his term in office he's attacked the Governor-general Sir
William Deane, High Court Judges, the United Nations,
Amnesty International, our indigenous leaders, our religious
leaders, historians, academics et al, ad nauseam, in fact anybody
and everybody who disagrees with his distorted view of the world.
True, there's no argument that he's an unattractive, myopic, balding
dwarf with an effeminate high falsetto who's an embarrassment to this
country whenever he represents us overseas
infidel
>
> "Ms Kitty" <walnu...@yahoo.co.uk> waffled in message
> news:O5Omb.166034$bo1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >
> > quick to criticise the PM are we?...so who are you? I don't see you in
the
> > top job...but I bet you're taking advantage of this country's economic
> > stability...
>
>
> You call that criticism?
Billy (William Morris) Hughes was Australia's worst PM!!!!!
A Party Pooper
FA
I.
Ms Kitty
that criticism, he's still PM and you're not..and you can't do a damn thing
about it.
"Serge" <serg...@one.net.au> wrote in message
news:LpPmb.812$Lx5....@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
Gary Woodman
news:lWXmb.166393$bo1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> on...besides all that criticism, he's still PM and you're not..and you
> can't do a damn thing about it.
Really. So you're announcing the end of "democracy" in Australia?
Gary
--
Don't have a local servo any more :-/
sinthreck
>"Ms Kitty" <spaceki...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
>news:lWXmb.166393$bo1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>
>> on...besides all that criticism, he's still PM and you're not..and you
>> can't do a damn thing about it.
>
>Really. So you're announcing the end of "democracy" in Australia?
>
>Gary
Yes, didn't you know that Bush, Howard and Blair are all dictators?
You should attend some protests and educate yourself.
Gary Woodman
news:sodppvk2gip19g7si...@4ax.com:
Um, OK. When's the next protest? Will my idol, John Winston Stalin, be
there?
sinthreck
>Um, OK. When's the next protest? Will my idol, John Winston Stalin, be
>there?
>
>Gary
No but all the protests are run by the socialist alternative group so
you can go there and discuss their heros, marx, lenin & stalin with
them if you like.
Axel Van Kampen
>
> I hope you enjoyed your visit to Australia. It was amusing.....
Dear Serge,
Why do you address this letter to George Bush and send it to aus.politics?
Are you too gutless to send it to George?
You fucking chickenshit wanker!!!!!
Thomas Jerome Newton
He knows the WHitehouse email server is set to bounce leftist spam.
Ms Kitty
"Thomas Jerome Newton" <t...@KILLsubdimensionSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:m5crpvsuhre2pbsgl...@4ax.com...
Ernest
Actually it does not, it back tracks it and
reports it to RIAA as being a Peer2peer
music server so that they can trash it.
Serge
"Axel Van Kampen" <Kaf...@bigpond.com> ranted in message
news:3f9d0233$0$23604$5a62...@freenews.iinet.net.au...
DON'T call me "Dear" you doughnut punching Kaffir.
I didn't address that letter to anyone you flatulent, nuerone-difficient,
pea-brained cretin.
Get a big person to read the original post you gormless, rancid little turd.
It clearly shows it was a letter to the editor by Jo-Anne Lentern (SMH 25
Oct 2003).
(sigh!) Why are all right-wing shirtlifters such complete drongos.
I notice that little Tommy 'hasn't got a clue' Newton and that stupid fat
sow Ms 'what day is it' Kitty also can't read.
I always reckon that any woman who calls herself 'Ms' does so to hide the
fact that she's not married, (no surprises there Kitty, are there).
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Original post:
Dear Mr. Bush,
I hope you enjoyed your visit to Australia. It was amusing to hear you use
Axel Van Kampen
>
> "Axel Van Kampen" <Kaf...@bigpond.com> ranted in message
> news:3f9d0233$0$23604$5a62...@freenews.iinet.net.au...
> >
> > "Serge" <serg...@one.net.au> wrote in message
> > news:2eDmb.518$Lx5....@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> > >
> > > Dear Mr. Bush,
> > >
> > > I hope you enjoyed your visit to Australia. It was amusing.....
> >
> > Dear Serge,
> >
> > Why do you address this letter to George Bush and send it to
aus.politics?
> > Are you too gutless to send it to George?
> >
> > You fucking chickenshit wanker!!!!!
>
>
> DON'T call me "Dear" you doughnut punching Kaffir.
>
> I didn't address that letter to anyone you flatulent, nuerone-difficient,
> pea-brained cretin.
Yes you did!!!!
You fucking dumb cunt, you wrote "Dear Mr. Bush,"
How fucking stupid are you? You can't even read your own posts!!!!
Talk about fuckwits, you take the fucking cake!!!
Serge
You mean the bloke who rid the world of Hitler?
As we all know, the Soviet Union destroyed the nazis. A victory engineered
by Stalin, who despite his excesses, deserves our undying gratitude for
(rather ironically) saving the "Free World" from tyranny.
Onya Joe, give our regards to a grateful God.
Serge.
Serge
"Axel Van Kampen" <kaf...@bigpond.com> ranted in message
news:3f9e6e40$0$23595$5a62...@freenews.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Serge" <serg...@one.net.au> wrote in message
> news:inrnb.255$%T1....@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> >
> > "Axel Van Kampen" <Kaf...@bigpond.com> ranted in message
> > news:3f9d0233$0$23604$5a62...@freenews.iinet.net.au...
> > >
> > > "Serge" <serg...@one.net.au> wrote in message
> > > news:2eDmb.518$Lx5....@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> > > >
> > > > Dear Mr. Bush,
> > > >
> > > > I hope you enjoyed your visit to Australia. It was amusing.....
> > >
> > > Dear Serge,
> > >
> > > Why do you address this letter to George Bush and send it to
> > > aus.politics? Are you too gutless to send it to George?
> > >
> > > You fucking chickenshit wanker!!!!!
> >
> >
> > DON'T call me "Dear" you doughnut punching Kaffir.
> >
> > nuerone-difficient, pea-brained cretin.
>
> Yes you did!!!!
> You fucking dumb cunt, you wrote "Dear Mr. Bush,"
>
> How fucking stupid are you? You can't even read your own posts!!!!
> Talk about fuckwits, you take the fucking cake!!!
When I said to get a big person to read my original post to you, I wasn't
talking about your stupid old man, Axel. That fool obviously passed on his
mutated genes to you, his bastard son.
So let me explain it to you AGAIN shit-for-brains.
Jo-Anne Lentern (SMH 25 Oct 2030) wrote that *entire* piece.
I only agreed with her . . .
Jo-Anne Lentern's post:
Dear Mr. Bush,
I hope you enjoyed your visit to Australia. It was amusing to hear you use
that great Aussie term "fair dinkum", a term that has fallen out of common
use lately, for reasons that I am sure you will understand. I fear you may
have been somewhat misled as to its meaning, because you equated it with the
Texan term, "man of steel".
This is a description that we in Australia understand very well, and it does
suit Mr. Howard. He is rigid and uncompromising, cold and hard, highly
polished but still dull somehow.
"Fair dinkum" means something very different. It means true and honest,
trustworthy and sincere.
I hope you can see your mistake.
- Jo-Anne Lentern (SMH 25 Oct 2030)
Do you understand now? you flatulent, odious little ponce.
I d-i-d n-o-t c-o-m-p-o-s-e t-h-a-t p-o-s-t.
I hope this isn't moving too fast for you?
(fucking cowboy)
Thomas Jerome Newton
wrote:
Nice bit of lefty revisionism, idiot.
Axel Van Kampen
Then you should have stated that UP FRONT YOU FUCKING DORK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The way YOU posted it, it is adressed from YOU to Mr Bush!
Didn't you go to school at all? Ever?
Talk about thick as two bricks............
Serge
"Thomas Jerome Newton" <t...@KILLsubdimensionSPAM.com> wrote in message
"revisionism"? that's rather a big word for a little bloke like you Tommy.
But you appear to be a little confused. "Revisionism" is a word that's
currently linked to Howard's dictatorial decree that the Australian National
Museum change its exhibits to show the genocidal white invaders as
'benefactors' of the aboriginals.
The word you are looking for to describe my comment, is "accurate".
Point 1 - It's well documented that the Soviets were responsible for ridding
the world of Hitler by forcing his suicide during the Battle for Berlin.
You really ought to open the odd book before disputing claims that show you
up for being the uninformed, ridiculous fool that you undoubtedly are.
Point 2 - The Soviet Union did indeed destroy the Nazis The war was
essentially fought and won on the Eastern Front. A Front that saw the
routing of the German, Romanian and Hungarian armies, culminating in the
Battle for Berlin and the subsequent surrender of the surviving German
forces.
One only need examine the casualty figures to see where the bulk of the
fighting took place, the Soviet Union lost a staggering twenty million dead.
The overwhelming bulk of the 5 million German dead were also lost on the
Eastern Front, losses sustained in the largest and bloodiest land battles in
history.
British dead, including civilians and Commonwealth troops, numbered a paltry
500,000. Whilst American losses were a laughable 350,000. They might as well
have stayed at home for all the good that they did.
The British had their arses kicked all the way from Dunkirk to Singapore,
getting a sound thrashing at Crete, Dieppe and Arnhem, along the way. I
vividly remember seeing footage of a sniggering wehrmacht picking up
thousands of pairs of British army boots from the beaches of Dunkirk after
the BEF stabbed the French in the back and did a runner. The only
'contribution' they made to the war effort, was to the Nazis, by leaving
enough equipment on the beaches in their mad panic to flee to arm a dozen
German divisions.
Come to think of it, the only 'battle' involving the Pommes which I can
recall, was the 'Battle' of Britain, in which 397 pilots were killed. In a
conflagration that saw the deaths of an estimated 50,000,000 people, it
wasn't really a battle, in fact it doesn't even qualify as a disagreement.
The incompetent British lost 832 fighters, the Germans lost only 668
fighters (the Germans fighter pilots were obviously a class above their
opposition), together with 600 slow, lumbering, sitting duck bombers. Jesus,
even though the pommes had early-warning radar and lay in wait for the
lumbering bombers like a pack of jackals, they still managed to lose more
fighters than the Germans lost bombers. A pathetic outcome by any objective
analysis and a further indictment of the incompetence of the British
military.
Yes, I'm afraid it was all left up to the Soviet Union.
For example, in 1943 at Kursk, the largest clash of armour ever, 196 of the
best German divisions (two-thirds of the German army) were defeated,
together with 32 divisions and 8 brigades from Germany's allies. A total of
228 divisions and 8 brigades cut to pieces.
The Soviet-German front at that time remained as it had been, the chief and
decisive front of the war, as only 7 divisions and 2 brigades - 2.7% of the
German army were in action against Anglo-American forces.
Although it was fashionable during the Cold War to suggest that the Russian
winter was responsible for the German defeat (no pun intended) it should be
remembered that German forces spent four long years in the Soviet Union.
We should pay homage to the Russian generals, Zhukov in particular. A man
considered by analysts to have been the most brilliant commander in military
history.
Stalin as commander in chief should be given due credit for overseeing that
victory and delivering us from the heel of the Nazi insanity.
The fact is, the D-day invasion of Europe and the subsequent light
resistance that was encountered would have been impossible if Hitler had not
attacked the Soviet Union.
So, I say again, Stalin is undoubtedly sitting at the Right Hand of God for
saving his "chosen people" from complete extermination.
Serge.
.
Thomas Jerome Newton
wrote:
}
}"Thomas Jerome Newton" <t...@KILLsubdimensionSPAM.com> wrote in message
}news:3tj0qv0oqmf14ngm3...@4ax.com...
}>
}> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 01:14:48 +1100, "Serge" <serg...@one.net.au>
}> wrote:
}> }
}> }"Quentin Burward" <que...@burward.com> wrote in message
}> }news:BBC1579F.1800A%que...@burward.com...
}> }>
}> }> Serge at <serg...@one.net.au> says:
}> }>
}> }> > Dear Mr. Bush,
}> }> >
}> }> > I hope you enjoyed your visit to Australia. It was amusing to hear
}> }> > you use that great Aussie term "fair dinkum", a term that has fallen
}> }> > out of common use lately, for reasons that I am sure you will
}> }> > understand. I fear you may have been somewhat misled as to its
}> }> > meaning, because you equated it with the Texan term, "man of steel".
}> }>
}> }> I don't know whether anyone else has mentioned the possibility, but our
}> }> president's bestowal of that sobriquet on our prime minister may have
}> }> been inspired by the Russian meaning of the name that was adopted by
}> }> the man who was born Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili.
}> }
}> }
}> }You mean the bloke who rid the world of Hitler?
}> }
}> }As we all know, the Soviet Union destroyed the nazis. A victory
}> }engineered by Stalin, who despite his excesses, deserves our undying
}> }gratitude for (rather ironically) saving the "Free World" from tyranny.
}> }
}> }Onya Joe, give our regards to a grateful God.
}> }
}>
}> Nice bit of lefty revisionism, idiot.
}
}
}"revisionism"? that's rather a big word for a little bloke like you Tommy.
}
Have you worked out what it means yet? What does it say in your
socialist handbook?
}But you appear to be a little confused. "Revisionism" is a word that's
}currently linked to Howard's dictatorial decree that the Australian National
}Museum change its exhibits to show the genocidal white invaders as
}'benefactors' of the aboriginals.
}
Seems like everything leads back to Howard for you. Quite an obsession
you have there.
BTW, if you think about it the aborigines never had it this good -
welfare on tap, running businesses, making huge profits off the
sympathy industry. I bet they kneel down and thank god every day for
white settlement.
}The word you are looking for to describe my comment, is "accurate".
}
Nothing that comes out of a socialist's mouth has anything to do with
accuracy.
}Point 1 - It's well documented that the Soviets were responsible for ridding
}the world of Hitler by forcing his suicide during the Battle for Berlin.
}
Bollocks. The US and Britain were moving on Berlin from one side while
the Russians converged from the East. The Soviets happened to reach
there first. To say they were solely responsible or somehow forced his
suicide (he chose to commit suicide rather than be captured - by
either side) is typical socialist bullshit.
}You really ought to open the odd book before disputing claims that show you
}up for being the uninformed, ridiculous fool that you undoubtedly are.
}
Reading a single book or Soviet textbooks hardly qualifies as being
informed, Serge, you socialist fuckwit.
}Point 2 - The Soviet Union did indeed destroy the Nazis The war was
}essentially fought and won on the Eastern Front. A Front that saw the
}routing of the German, Romanian and Hungarian armies, culminating in the
}Battle for Berlin and the subsequent surrender of the surviving German
}forces.
}
The Soviets played a significant role but if it wasn't for the allies
and their aid to the USSR their role would have been greatly
diminished. If Germany didn't have a war on two fronts (and Hitler is
largely to blame for this) a war with Russia alone would have seen the
USSR roundly defeated by the superior German forces.
}One only need examine the casualty figures to see where the bulk of the
}fighting took place, the Soviet Union lost a staggering twenty million dead.
}The overwhelming bulk of the 5 million German dead were also lost on the
}Eastern Front, losses sustained in the largest and bloodiest land battles in
}history.
}
Correct, however the reason for the high casualties on the Soviet side
were largely due to the poor quality of the troops and their command
structure (which had been decimated by Stalin).
}British dead, including civilians and Commonwealth troops, numbered a paltry
}500,000. Whilst American losses were a laughable 350,000. They might as well
}have stayed at home for all the good that they did.
}
Yeah, well if they had Germany would have relegated your hero to
Siberia. Where he belonged.
}The British had their arses kicked all the way from Dunkirk to Singapore,
}getting a sound thrashing at Crete, Dieppe and Arnhem, along the way. I
}vividly remember seeing footage of a sniggering wehrmacht picking up
}thousands of pairs of British army boots from the beaches of Dunkirk after
}the BEF stabbed the French in the back and did a runner. The only
}'contribution' they made to the war effort, was to the Nazis, by leaving
}enough equipment on the beaches in their mad panic to flee to arm a dozen
}German divisions.
}
Yeah right.
}Come to think of it, the only 'battle' involving the Pommes which I can
}recall, was the 'Battle' of Britain, in which 397 pilots were killed. In a
}conflagration that saw the deaths of an estimated 50,000,000 people, it
}wasn't really a battle, in fact it doesn't even qualify as a disagreement.
}The incompetent British lost 832 fighters, the Germans lost only 668
}fighters (the Germans fighter pilots were obviously a class above their
}opposition), together with 600 slow, lumbering, sitting duck bombers. Jesus,
}even though the pommes had early-warning radar and lay in wait for the
}lumbering bombers like a pack of jackals, they still managed to lose more
}fighters than the Germans lost bombers. A pathetic outcome by any objective
}analysis and a further indictment of the incompetence of the British
}military.
}
}Yes, I'm afraid it was all left up to the Soviet Union.
}
Well, it's good to see you made up your mind on that. Don't let
reality get in the way. This is the same Soviet Union that got its
arse kicked by the Finns, right?
}For example, in 1943 at Kursk, the largest clash of armour ever, 196 of the
}best German divisions (two-thirds of the German army) were defeated,
}together with 32 divisions and 8 brigades from Germany's allies. A total of
}228 divisions and 8 brigades cut to pieces.
}
The massively superior numbers of the Russians had nothing to do with
that of course. Due to the Western Front and blunders of Hitler they
were given a respite long enough to rally their forces and bring war
production online. They were hopelessly prepared for any type of war
at the time of Barbarossa.
}The Soviet-German front at that time remained as it had been, the chief and
}decisive front of the war, as only 7 divisions and 2 brigades - 2.7% of the
}German army were in action against Anglo-American forces.
}
}Although it was fashionable during the Cold War to suggest that the Russian
}winter was responsible for the German defeat (no pun intended) it should be
}remembered that German forces spent four long years in the Soviet Union.
}
}We should pay homage to the Russian generals, Zhukov in particular. A man
}considered by analysts to have been the most brilliant commander in military
}history.
}
Er, Zhukov was a brilliant commander, but calling him the "the most
brilliant commander in military history" is just bullshit. Every war
and period are different.
}Stalin as commander in chief should be given due credit for overseeing that
}victory and delivering us from the heel of the Nazi insanity.
}
Rubbish. It was Stalin's ineptitude that saw the USSR so underprepared
and its armed forces in such poor shape when Germany attacked. It was
Hitler's hubris and poor decisions rather than anything to do with
Stalin that saw German forces over stretched and defeated.
}The fact is, the D-day invasion of Europe and the subsequent light
}resistance that was encountered would have been impossible if Hitler had not
}attacked the Soviet Union.
}
I'm glad you agree with me.
}So, I say again, Stalin is undoubtedly sitting at the Right Hand of God for
}saving his "chosen people" from complete extermination.
}
Ah, Serge, you've had too much Soviet brainwashing. You've lost the
ability to think for yourself.
Serge
"Thomas Jerome Newton" <t...@KILLsubdimensionSPAM.com> wrote in message
(sigh!)
Nothing but cliché's from poor old Tommy.
Nothing substantive, nothing new, nothing intelligent, just
tired old cliché's.
How sad.
Thomas Jerome Newton
wrote:
In other words I've shown your idiotic claims to be exactly that and
you don't have any comeback.
It is interesting to note that while you exalt Stalin as a hero for
ridding the world of Hitler he himself was responsible for murdering
far more people than Hitler ever did.
Of course to a leftie fuckwit that's of minor consequence (what's a
few million killed here or there i the name of the great cause) as
Stalin is still a great hero of socialism.