"Three hundred boat people at RAAF Scherger Air Base in Weipa.
They are mostly single men from Afghanistan all are being accepted into
Australia. All men.
All receive the pension same as our pensioners. All get the same amount
again for hardship payment.
Equals twice what our pensioners get. All receive fifty dollars a day for
spending money.
Security staff employed to watch them. Chefs employed to feed them.
One quarter of a tonne of chicken a day alone is cooked.
They won't pick up their own rubbish.
There was a massive dispute because they didn't like the radio station.
Another dispute because batteries were flat for the Nintendo games.
Tents set up for mosque prayers had to be air conditioned
The Bores/Wells set up to run RAAF Sherger adequately are now dry because
taps are left running all day long.
Sewerage systems now blocked with condoms (???) supplied to them [ all
men.....remember]
Dept of Immigration & Citizenship (DIAC) wants Dept of Defence to pay all
the bills so they can hide the costs from the public by allowing three
hundred poofters into the country.
Australia needs to know.
Congratulations Gillard you fool. "
--
"God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the
best". Voltaire..
Sounds like Bob Brown visits regularly
--
Petzl
Question - When you apply for Welfare in Pakistan, Afghanistan,
Vietnam, Somalia, Sri-Lanka, or India, what does that Government give
you?
Answer - A map of Australia
I could name the source, if I wanted to.
Source? Alan Jones of course.
Need you ask.
=====
John Howard *never* stopped the boats.
The Hawke/Keating government stopped the boats in
1983/1984/1985/1986/1987 and 1988.
Not one boat arrived during those years.
Johnny simply played catch-up but never quite got there.
Another dispute because batteries were flat for the Nintendo games.
Tents set up for mosque prayers had to be air conditioned"
Awww the poor babies! I support granting refugee visas but even I'm going
WTF? If I was PM I would say "Right, you don't like your prayer tents? Go
back to your own country. And Nintendo games? What is this, a 5 star
resort?"
"Spartan613" wrote in message
news:L8tZo.8198$gM3....@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
"Spartan613" wrote in message
news:hVtZo.7962$MF5...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
"jg" <j...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:NMtZo.7959$MF5....@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
> Spartan613 wrote:
> ..........
>>
>>
>> All receive the pension same as our pensioners. All get the same amount
>> again for hardship payment.
>>
>>
>> Equals twice what our pensioners get. All receive fifty dollars a day for
>> spending money.
>>
>>
> ........
> Since that much is untrue, can you verify any of it or name the source?
>I could name the source, if I wanted to.
Ah crap, I believed him. If only I was as skeptical as jg.
"bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
news:cd1a191c-bee8-4f62...@r16g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
jg <j...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Spartan613 wrote:
>
> ..........
>
> > All receive the pension same as our pensioners. All get the same amount
> > again for hardship payment.
>
> > Equals twice what our pensioners get. All receive fifty dollars a day
> > for spending money.
>
> ........
>
> Since that much is untrue, can you verify any of it or name the source?
Source? Alan Jones of course.
Need you ask.
=====
I can picture the old ladies calling in now and whining.
If you are wondering why Seon is so painfully gullible and was so
ready to stupidly swallow Spartan's bullshit...
This should answer your question:
====
During the 13 years of the Hawke/Keating government there were 1,925
boat people arrivals.
During the 12 years of the Howard government there were 13,663 boat
people arrivals.
A massive 700% increase!
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bn/sp/boatarrivals.htm
It's unfathomable how the conservatives have managed to dupe
Australians into thinking that they are better at "border
protection".
Their lies and slavish media support notwithstanding.
Makes one wonder at how Coalition supporters
can reconcile those
damning figures.
Short memories and just plain stupid I guess.
> jg <j...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> Spartan613 wrote:
>>
>> ..........
>>
>> > All receive the pension same as our pensioners. All get the same amount
>> > again for hardship payment.
>>
>> > Equals twice what our pensioners get. All receive fifty dollars a day
>> > for spending money.
>>
>> ........
>>
>> Since that much is untrue, can you verify any of it or name the source?
>
>Source? Alan Jones of course.
>
>Need you ask.
>
I read it too
--
Petzl
Let’ s see how decent Muslim countries are to refugees
The ONLY countries welcoming Moslem refugees are the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, most European countries and a few in South America.
What do they all have in common?
They have a Christian historical tradition
not an Islamic Sharia history.
Came from the ADF not Allan Jones
>"There was a massive dispute because they didn't like the radio station.
>
>
>Another dispute because batteries were flat for the Nintendo games.
>
>
>Tents set up for mosque prayers had to be air conditioned"
>
>Awww the poor babies! I support granting refugee visas but even I'm going
>WTF? If I was PM I would say "Right, you don't like your prayer tents? Go
>back to your own country. And Nintendo games? What is this, a 5 star
>resort?"
>
AI would use them as bayonet pratice long before they got to Weipa
Gillard has to get Bob Browns permision first
..
Petzl
Islam is of course synonymous with terrorism
"Petzl" wrote in message news:n5scj61bh8h7g6lmt...@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:49:33 +1100, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
>"bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
>news:cd1a191c-bee8-4f62...@r16g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
>jg <j...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> Spartan613 wrote:
>>
>> ..........
>>
>> > All receive the pension same as our pensioners. All get the same amount
>> > again for hardship payment.
>>
>> > Equals twice what our pensioners get. All receive fifty dollars a day
>> > for spending money.
>>
>> ........
>>
>> Since that much is untrue, can you verify any of it or name the source?
>
>Source? Alan Jones of course.
>
>Need you ask.
>
>=====
>
>I can picture the old ladies calling in now and whining.
>Came from the ADF not Allan Jones
--
What site?
"bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
news:591b2d1e-5f89-49ba...@t8g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
It pops up in bulk emails word for word all over the 'net. Doesn't sound
like an ADF action to me, nor the way Allan Jones operates for that matter.
Stories like this mostly began in the USA and have some place names
substituted, but this looks home grown at least.
The name of the source is irrelevant. I can't say how accurate the "report"
is, but the individual in question has connections to people at Scherger.
Really? I don't know, speak to, or listen to Alan Jones.
So that makes you a liar.
But we all know you're a lying wog.
You mean the individual who cleans out the shitters at the base?
In the same Union as you, is he? LOL
"Spartan613" wrote in message
news:ocvZo.8208$gM3....@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
I could make up any insane crap and say "The name of the source has to be a
secret" like, :a secret source inside the American government told me Bush
did 911" unless I cited that information I could be a...well a liar.
You mean the individual who cleans out the shitters at the base?
In the same Union as you, is he? LOL
*********
Just the sort of infantile and puerile remark we'd expect form a parasite
wog of your *ahem* caliber.
Run along wog, you're not up to conversing with grown-ups.
>>
>> Came from the ADF not Allan Jones
>> --
>
>It pops up in bulk emails word for word all over the 'net. Doesn't sound
>like an ADF action to me, nor the way Allan Jones operates for that matter.
>
>Stories like this mostly began in the USA and have some place names
>substituted, but this looks home grown at least.
>
You are in denial and don't want the truth
>>
>> Ah crap, I believed him. If only I was as skeptical as jg.
>
>>The name of the source is irrelevant. I can't say how accurate the "report"
>>is, but the individual in question has connections to people at Scherger.
>
>I could make up any insane crap and say "The name of the source has to be a
>secret" like, :a secret source inside the American government told me Bush
>did 911" unless I cited that information I could be a...well a liar.
Its not secret but the guy works for the Military and you don't need
to know. Brash has been around for yonks and always states the fact.
He is not a petzl fan either
--
Petzl
Battle Hymn of the Republic
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=JCqZ-9-lDEo
http://tinyurl.com/8vqqxd
Wriog, you lying misfit - Alan Jones has been on holidays for 6 weeks,
if not longer. At the moment, a fellow named Andrew Moore is filling
in and this Andrew is as vital as a wet sock--
I don't even listen to morning radio.
OS
That's the problem with you leftards, you block off your ears when
your gods are being criticised.
God 1, Whitlam (who put Australia on the slippery dip) God 2, Hawke,
boozer-womanizer, God 3 Keating - faggot and today, GayBob and his
wooden doll, Julia and our traitors Oakshott and Windsor. . .
Mo wonder you block off your ears - don't even hear the rain that came
instead of the predicted continuation of drought.
OS
The only people who actually want it to be true are those seeking
political mileage, but I know some of it is not true and I'd like proof
any of it is true.
This sort of crap has been doing the rounds for years, it had it's first run
in Canada but it surfaces all over the place, it's peanuts for monkeys.
"Jack Simms" wrote in message
news:an2dj61k1lhpis93e...@4ax.com...
"olde.sault" wrote in message
news:4049752a-323f-4458...@u25g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>Petzl wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:03:27 +0800, jg <j...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Came from the ADF not Allan Jones
>>>> --
>>> It pops up in bulk emails word for word all over the 'net. Doesn't sound
>>> like an ADF action to me, nor the way Allan Jones operates for that matter.
>>>
>>> Stories like this mostly began in the USA and have some place names
>>> substituted, but this looks home grown at least.
>>>
>>
>> You are in denial and don't want the truth
>
>The only people who actually want it to be true are those seeking
>political mileage, but I know some of it is not true and I'd like proof
>any of it is true.
>
Zip up there and take a look you arse
of course it's true
Petzl
--
If it's in the Koran, it's Allah's word
Slavery-Paedophillia (Thighing)-incest (inbreeding)- Female Genitail Mutilation- polygamy/polygyny-Lying (taqiyya)-Halal (Animal Cruelty)- Honour Killings - Apostasy (murder for converting to Christ). even Beastility
Doing the "rounds" for years and you can't produce any link
>Yep but what do you expect from Petzl?
What do you expect from a Bob Brown/Gillard government?
http://www.news.com.au/asylum-seekers-land-at-weipa-airforce-base/story-e6freoof-1225942531658
--
Petzl
Is Gillard Australian? Is Abbott?
Robert Wood was elected in 1987 to take his seat in the Senate in 1988 The High Court, in its decision In Re Wood ((1988)167 CLR 145),declared Wood s election to be invalid, as he was not an Australian citizen at the time of his election.
Here's a link for one...
Courtesy of Alan Jones. Who else!
Alan Jones: The smugglers know the rules. The new ones. They know you
don't have to go to Nauru now. You don't have detention in the desert
now. You don't have a temporary protection visa now... There's an
email doing the rounds at the moment which is most probably a bit
apocryphal and a bit inventive but it's instructive and it says that:
"If you cross the North Korean border illegally you get 12 years hard
labour.
If you cross the Iranian border illegally you are detained
indefinitely.
If you cross the Afghan border illegally, you'll get shot...
If you cross the Chinese border illegally you may never be heard from
again...
but" as the email says, "if you cross the Australian border illegally
you'll get a job, a driver's licence, a social security card,
welfare..."
— Radio 2GB, The Alan Jones Breakfast Show, 26th March, 2010
”
And so on... But Alan, did you say 'social security card'? Isn't
that something Americans have?
Well, yes it is. In fact this is just
another nasty viral email. It's been circulating for months in the
United States, and has been sent to US Congressmen and Senators...
http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s2859276.htm
That's what that lying fat toad, Jones, said: "you'll get a social
security card". ROTFL
And idiots like Olde.sault and Putzel lap it up.
=====
Just Islamonazi spin re-educating" us about the facts
Explain how this Moslem assylum shopper was paid Millions (not
million)
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bcd_1222010336
look at this one
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b14_1215782328
>> The name of the source is irrelevant. I can't say how accurate the "report"
>> is, but the individual in question has connections to people at Scherger.
>
>You mean the individual who cleans out the shitters at the base?
Don't be modest, scum bag.
>
--
"One thing is sure - there will be no Gillard era. This is not a
20-year stretch. Civilised people's hands are already over their faces
every time she speaks. That cannot last. She has no power, no
influence, no friends, no learning. There's not much there."
Bob Ellis (ALP speech writer) on Dullard! http://tinyurl.com/23jklvv
"Gillard is part of a Melbourne-based gang Ellis dubs the "Mouse Pack",
which includes Simon Crean and Martin Ferguson.
"They twitch their whiskers and come out in favour of the Afghan war
without studying the problem or noting that an army intelligence
officer [independent MP Andrew Wilkie] holds the balance of power,"
Ellis says."
More Bob Ellis (ALP Speech writer) on Dullard! http://tinyurl.com/23jklvv
What's the waiting list like? I might try to book in, but I'd want
segregation rights from muslims on religious grounds of course. How fast
is their broadband?
--
Labor-Green open borders plan in action...
Number of illegal aliens in detention (nearest hundred):
Jan 2005 __________ 1000
Jul 2005 ________ 800
Jan 2006 _________ 900
Jul 2006 ______ 600
Jan 2007 _____ 500
Jul 2007 ____ 400
Jan 2008 ____ 400
Jul 2008 ___ 300
Jan 2009 ___ 300 -> Rudd stops TPVs
Jul 2009 __________ 1000
Jan 2010 _________________ 1700
Jul 2010 ______________________________ 2000
Boat watch alert: 4 boats arrive in last 2 days - 7/11/2010
- more than 6000 people arrive in 2010 and 121 boats
- 35 boats arrive since the 21/8/2010 election - more than 1700 people
- 100 illegals in 3 boats over 2 days transferred to Christmas Is. -
29/11/2010
** - more than 27 people die as a direct result of Rudd/Gillard open
borders policy - 15/12/2010 **
I would use Gillard and Bob Brown for bayonet practice long before I
bothered with 300 asylum shoppers. The latter only cost us into the
hundreds of millions.
What's the shit about using our Prime Minister and a federal senator for
bayonet practice?
Maybe you'd be happier somewhere else where that sort of stuff is OK but
it's not OK here, it's not the Australian way.
Petzl's a moron, you're keeping bad company.
Don't answer Petzl, you'll only encourage the loon.
> =====
>
> During the 13 years of the Hawke/Keating government there were 1,925
> boat people arrivals.
>
> During the 12 years of the Howard government there were 13,663 boat
> people arrivals.
>
> A massive 700% increase!
>
> http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bn/sp/boatarrivals.htm
>
> It's unfathomable how the conservatives have managed to dupe
> Australians into thinking that they are better at "border
> protection".
>
> Their lies and slavish media support notwithstanding.
>
> Makes one wonder at how Coalition supporters ?can reconcile those
Since when did Australian scruples and ethics become a feature of this
group, with all the leftist/green traitors spouting their treason. Fair
go mate!
Anyone can mouth off here as much as they like, but if scruples and
ethics have no place then neither does 'fair go mate'.
This is the sort of "truth" they want to hear...
http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s2229663.htm
Here's a sample:
Alan Jones: Well apropos of things that matter and that don't get
discussed because governments are out of touch with rank and file
Australians, I had an email from Brian. He said, "It's interesting to
note that the Federal Government provides a single refugee with a
monthly allowance of $1,890 and you also get an extra $580 in social
assistance for a total of $2470 a month, a refugee".
— 2GB, Alan Jones Show, 21st April, 2008
And so on, and so on. If you've been watching Media Watch you'll have
heard it all twice before this year.
Pensioners get less than half as much - maybe pensioners should become
refugees - forward this to all Australians - all garbage.
But Alan didn't think so:
Now is that a legitimate concern? I wonder who cares? Government
doesn't seem to. A refugee gets $2,470 a month, the pensioner $1,012
and that's called just, just, public administration.
— 2GB, Alan Jones Show, 21st April, 2008
And so on.
He was eventually forced to admit that it was a hoax email.
Fortunately Jones only attracts the gullible and the stupid like
Olde.sault, Oily roo, Spartan and Putzel.
Spin, when at least part of the email is an outright lie?
The Refugee Council is the umbrella body for more than 140 organisations
working with refugees and asylum seekers. We have rarely not had these
and someone has to deal with the mess when they arrive, if these
"islamonazis" don't do it who will - you?
I don't like or trust mussies either, but at least some asylum seekers
are non muslims escaping their crap - those Sudanese celebrating their
referendum on the weekend would have been.
Who is this dickhead in your commercial tv sensationalist video? Was he
a refugee? Where is the proof he picks up all that pension? He really
has SFA to do with 300 people in a camp in Weipa.
Accept it, or not. I don't care either way. Maybe it is bullshit. I don't
know because Weipa is too far away to go and check for myself.
I could pass on the bloke's name, but what difference would that make.
--
"God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the
best". Voltaire..
Interesting.
So aged pensioners have their accommodation provided, free entertainment,
and free meals cooked for them?
If they went to jail they would, but this was about asylum seekers
receiving double the pension - that myth originated in Canada. While
their claims are heard they don't have a pension at all.
Glad to hear it.
>jg <j...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> Petzl wrote:
>> > jg <j...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>> Came from the ADF not Allan Jones
>> >>
>> >> It pops up in bulk emails word for word all over the 'net. Doesn't sound
>> >> like an ADF action to me, nor the way Allan Jones operates for that matter.
>>
>> >> Stories like this mostly began in the USA and have some place names
>> >> substituted, but this looks home grown at least.
>>
>> > You are in denial and don't want the truth
>>
>> The only people who actually want it to be true are those seeking
>> political mileage, but I know some of it is not true and I'd like proof
>> any of it is true.
>
>This is the sort of "truth" they want to hear...
>
>http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s2229663.htm
>
>Here's a sample:
No mention of
"Three hundred boat people at RAAF Scherger Air Base in Weipa"
The pension of an Australian would be reduced in light of free bed &
board being provided by somebody. Since many pensioners spend their
entire pension on essential living expenses, these freebies provided to
asylum shoppers could be seen as the equivalent of a pension.
The pension is stopped if you are convicted, but paid for 1 year
unconvicted in custody. Payments are redirected to family (if
applicable) and there's some assistance for things like mortgages.
The pension thing is crap, comparisons with prisoners might also
overlook other issues about prisoners - people often say they have it
easy. But having detained anyone under any circumstances, you are
obliged to feed and house them.
Dishonest attempts at painting it as a 5 star hotel full of spoilt brats
don't do any credit to the real aim of festering displeasure over the
asylum seeker issue. And how many came by boat huh?
What's 'it'? The OP said the detainees all receive the pension plus the
same amount again for hardship payment, which is total and absolute bunk.
"It" is the free lodging and board as well as any extras thrown in like,
say, Pert 2-in-1 shampoo. "It" has a monetary value, probably in excess
of what a pension could buy.
Centrelink do provide "hardship payments" to Assylum Shoppers and
thats a fact thats been exposed from the Weipa Assylum Shopper base
http://www.asrc.org.au/media/documents/welfare-entitlements.pdf
"Asylum seekers in Australia awaiting decision on their protection
claims are not eligible for Centrelink. However, DIAC provide payments
to certain asylum seekers awaiting processing who are suffering severe
financial hardship. In 2009, 2,692 asylum seekers qualified for this
payment. The Asylum Seeker Assistance Scheme (ASAS), funded by DIAC and
administered by the Red Cross, provides the main source of income
support and other social services for *community-based* asylum seekers
suffering financial hardship."
Is there anything exposed from the Weipa Assylum base which isn't
complete bullsh*t?
Talk about clutching at straws.
Possibly correct. Obviously you missed the " " at the start and end of the
post.
It may be correct, or may not. I haven't verified it either way.
Correction, you quoted it. Since Centrelink deny that any aslylum
seekers receive any pension and the dept of immigration assist some
community based suffering hardship through the red cross, it's got no
chance of being correct has it? Do you often quote lies?
>>>
>>> What's 'it'? The OP said the detainees all receive the pension plus
>>> the same amount again for hardship payment, which is total and
>>> absolute bunk.
>>
>> Possibly correct. Obviously you missed the " " at the start and end of
>> the post.
>>
>> It may be correct, or may not. I haven't verified it either way.
>>
>
>Correction, you quoted it. Since Centrelink deny that any aslylum
>seekers receive any pension and the dept of immigration assist some
>community based suffering hardship through the red cross, it's got no
>chance of being correct has it? Do you often quote lies?
>
Centrelink do not deny exsistence of "hardship payments". Nor are
Centrelink the only government source for Assylum shoppers handouts
Centrelink don't pay anything to asylum seekers.
Only while they are under "investigation" as soon as any sort of temp visa
is granted :
They can still get money from the Australian Govt.
Asylum seekers get access to the Red Cross Asylum Seeker Assistance Scheme
for a limited period of time, which provides for an income that is 89% of
the Newstart Allowance (unemployment benefit).
through the government funded Asylum Seeker Assistance (ASA) Scheme
administered by the Department of Immigration Multicultural and Indigenous
Affairs (DIMIA) through contractual arrangements with the Australian Red
Cross
End result; they get
1. Free board and all meals,
2. Free legal aid,
3. Free TV and Internet access (Incl web based e-mail)
4. Housing accommodation at defence areas at the expense of service
families, and
5. Donations from the bleeding hearts of Australia
Far more than our own disadvantaged and pensioner population.
There were 52,469 refugee visa holders on Centrelink benefits as at June
30, 2009:
21,422 were on Newstart
13,582 were on the Youth Allowance
9881 were on the Disability Support Pension
5488 were on the aged pension
2096 were on Austudy
There were also 4324 Baby Bonus payments
Read what I wrote
The Weipa Asylum Shoppers have been accepted by Bob Brown into
Australia, therefore getting some part payment from Centrelink .
A lot of funding for these terrorists is from various and many
government departments (none accountable) like the "Department of
Immigration and Citizenship" as well as Islamic "Charities" and
others and they have it organized by fellow Moslem terror groups to
rip off every cent.
Always at the expense of genuine Christian Australians
That applies to those living in the community, not at Weipa.
> End result; they get
> 1. Free board and all meals,
> 2. Free legal aid,
> 3. Free TV and Internet access (Incl web based e-mail)
> 4. Housing accommodation at defence areas at the expense of service
> families, and
> 5. Donations from the bleeding hearts of Australia
>
> Far more than our own disadvantaged and pensioner population.
>
>
> There were 52,469 refugee visa holders on Centrelink benefits as at June
> 30, 2009:
>
> 21,422 were on Newstart
> 13,582 were on the Youth Allowance
> 9881 were on the Disability Support Pension
> 5488 were on the aged pension
> 2096 were on Austudy
> There were also 4324 Baby Bonus payments
>
>
>
It's no great surprise that refugees are lame ducks, I am arguing the
lies in this thread about the payments to detainees at Weipa.
When the liblabs signed us up for ~14,000 refugees a year, their
potential uselessness was probably considered. You have to ask them how
and why that figure was determined.
These welfares are all available to every Australian, if they want
nothing more than life at the bottom of the barrel. Does anyone know how
many of those 52,469 were boat people? I guess many of those would be
products or the wars we helped the US start, some might say poetic justice.
"All receive the pension same as our pensioners. All get the same amount
again for hardship payment." - That would only begin to be true if
Centrelink paid it. What's it say about the rest of the article?
Bob Brown doesn't 'accept' anyone into Australia, the dept of
immigration does under laws parliament makes. What's that say about the
rest of what you wrote? People accepted to live here don't live at Weipa.
Why not give them the same as our own needy and pensioners, but, they pay
for their food and rent, same as our pensioners?
Or, bite the bullet and provide our pensioners and needy with free board
and meals?
(In similar motel accommodation as the asylum shoppers)
Asylum seekers in detention don't receive any government money unless
they are community based, and then it's not as much as the pension.
I suppose you're referring to me so point out the double standard.
It doesn't matter if it's a newsgroup, a public bar or a street corner
there's no place for the kind of trash talk that you spouted.
You call for bayonet practice on the PM then accuse others or treason?
Fuck off.
On Jan 19, 3:48 pm, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Spartan613" wrote in message
>
> news:hVtZo.7962$MF5...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>
> "jg" <j...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>
> news:NMtZo.7959$MF5....@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>
> > Spartan613 wrote:
> > ..........
>
> >> All receive the pension same as our pensioners. All get the same amount
> >> again for hardship payment.
>
> >> Equals twice what our pensioners get. All receive fifty dollars a day
> >> for
> >> spending money.
>
> > ........
> > Since that much is untrue, can you verify any of it or name the source?
> >I could name the source, if I wanted to.
>
> Ah crap, I believed him. If only I was as skeptical as jg.
>That's the problem with you leftards, you block off your ears when
>your gods are being criticised.
As opposed to your problem of believing anything that fits your prejudices
regardless of the real facts.
Some might ask again, despite the deafening silence, how many were boat
people?
(mantra snipped)
Alan Jones: "I had an email from Brian. He said, "It's interesting to
note that the Federal Government provides a single refugee with a
monthly allowance of $1,890 and you also get an extra $580 in social
assistance for a total of $2470 a month, a refugee. Now is that a
legitimate concern? I wonder who cares? Government doesn't seem to. A
refugee gets $2,470 a month, the pensioner $1,012 and that's called
just, just, public administration.
— 2GB, Alan Jones Show, 21st April, 2008
He was eventually forced to admit that it was a hoax email.
Fortunately Jones only attracts the gullible and the stupid like
Olde.sault, Oily roo, Spartan, Sunny and Putzel.
> It doesn't matter if it's a newsgroup, a public bar or a street corner
> there's no place for the kind of trash talk that you spouted.
> You call for bayonet practice on the PM then accuse others or treason?
Jesting in that manner is very different from actually committing acts
of treason - like Wilke for instance, making public national secrets he
was entrusted with (now *there's* a candidate for real bayonet
practice). Clearly I forgot that the leftard mind can take the high
moral ground when it suits, just after calling for Abbott to be strung
up or whatever.
> Fuck off.
You would do well to take your own advice.
For some it's a vital issue when it comes to say, voting. Surely they
know how many of the bludgers are boat people. No? Didn't think so.
Maybe they don't want *any* parasites at all, regardless of the mode of
transport they rode in on. In that case, would they care how many are
boat people? No! bloody obvious.
"Mango" wrote in message
news:zOSZo.8310$gM3....@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
And boy is she prejudiced...and bigoted.
So boat people are just a convenient target, as I suspected. What do
those non-discriminating folk think of our refugee quota which hardly
varies - should be lower... zero? Perhaps that's where their complaints
and votes should be directed.
***********
Pot, this is kettle. Over.
No. I didn't know it was a lie.
Have you stopped rooting your dog?
This is, was and always will be your opinion. Others will see boat queue
jumpers as yet another problematic layer, with its own separate and
additional issues. I guess the only way to find out the Australian
opinions on the issue is at election. My own view was summed up by
Howard - *we* decide who comes into our country and *we* decide the
circumstances under which they come. Once that becomes a reality, _then_
we can start addressing details. It hasn't happened yet though.
I don't give a fuck whether they came by plane, train, or automobile. A
parasite is a parasite and needs to be removed.
Like that Bembrika cunt. Now there's a face I'd like to punch.
Even that supposed hoax email was and is basically true. The same
story is happening in all countries with a Christian history that are
taking asylum shoppers
The Asylum Shopper story came from the
RAAF Scherger Air Base in Weipa. Without going there and actually
checking one is not going to get 100% confirmation of accuracy and
even if one does go there leftards in this group would howl lies
--
Petzl
Let� s see how decent Muslim countries are to refugees
The ONLY countries welcoming Moslem refugees are the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, most European countries and a few in South America.
What do they all have in common?
They have a Christian historical tradition
not an Islamic Sharia history.
>Some might ask again, despite the deafening silence, how many were boat
>people?
You know this though I posted the link before
http://goo.gl/Yhofd
While we accept a constant 14,000 refugees a year, we are obviously not
choosing who comes and it's bullsh*t to pretend anyone is better at
'border protection'. Not knowing how many of the troublemaking detainees
are boat people is proof the critics who single them out know nothing of
their relative character.
Ok, we can put you down as one who doesn't want any refugees. Who will
you vote for to promote that?
A couple of the commentators think they are all boat people - are they
correct?
>>>
>>> For some it's a vital issue when it comes to say, voting. Surely they
>>> know how many of the bludgers are boat people. No? Didn't think so.
>>
>> I don't give a fuck whether they came by plane, train, or automobile. A
>> parasite is a parasite and needs to be removed.
>>
>> Like that Bembrika cunt. Now there's a face I'd like to punch.
>>
>
>Ok, we can put you down as one who doesn't want any refugees. Who will
>you vote for to promote that?
>
No "refugee" (Asylum Shopper) that gets to Australia should be allowed
citizenship and be sent back when the it is deemed near safe enough to
do so (no excuses)
Why I always vote no 1 for Christian Democratic Party (CDP) they have
the reasonable policy of "No more Moslems". Enough votes mean the
major stream parties will have to comply
Petzl
--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the judiciary must apply the law!
Au contraire, knobhead.
I don't mind legit refugees. I have no time for parasite asylum-shoppers.
IE, the East Timorese who came to Australia were legitimate.
>Who will you vote for to promote that?
Not the Greens, that's for sure. Those nonsensical dickheads would open a
floodgate of spongers... and then tax the fuck out of everything to pay for
them.
You can easily contact Weipa council to find out full story from them
http://www.weipatownoffice.com/17.html
But then you won't believe them either so whats your point?
Presumably none the refugees for the last 10 or so years would not have
qualified, in your book.
>> Who will you vote for to promote that?
>
> Not the Greens, that's for sure. Those nonsensical dickheads would open
> a floodgate of spongers... and then tax the fuck out of everything to
> pay for them.
>
So much for who you would not vote for, do you have an actual answer?
That you are only pushing your own bigoted barrow and have no interest
in the truth. Your links do no more to answer any questions than your
own ramblings.
pot calling kettle argument
You are harping from your favourite soapbox again. Not all threads on
asylum shoppers are linked directly with your border protection fixation.
Only if they were processed correctly by the UNHCR, and didn't just lob up
on our shores after paying big bucks to get here.
>
>>> Who will you vote for to promote that?
>>
>> Not the Greens, that's for sure. Those nonsensical dickheads would open a
>> floodgate of spongers... and then tax the fuck out of everything to pay
>> for them.
>>
>
> So much for who you would not vote for, do you have an actual answer?
The Shooters Party. Howzat?
I notice you didn't disagree with my assessment of the watermelons and their
fruit loop policies.
It wasn't about my opinion of the greens, even your opinion hardly
answered the question. What quota would they work to? I know they are
the only party to understand there is a population problem.