Re: Question for "Dissleskik ED"
Tony Burns
"]v[etaphoid" wrote:
>
> "Dissleskik Won known as - ED" <na...@ask.me.nicely> wrote in message
> news:10v7j2g...@news.supernews.com...
> > Hello ]v[etaphoid,
> >
> > Thank you for your interest in my motivation behind my name change. I
> would
> > be happy to explain if you can please tell me why you care about the
> change.
> > It would seem only AJS, Eric Anderson and possibly V© (doubtful) would
> care
> > so much.
>
> Glad you asked. And in the interests of hearing your own explanation of the
> questions posed and ignored thus far, here's my best answer for you;
>
> I have a theory that you are in fact Nigel Howe and that you have invented
> this persona in order to fraudulently promote HyperOz. An unexplained
> predisposition against one of Nigels's enemies - a man you've had absolutely
> no contact and no history with, is but one of many pieces of evidence which
> support this scenario, and one I'm yet to hear any plausible explanation
> for.
>
> > Can you also explain how you would know what level of contact I have had
> > with "the aforementioned dyslexic ED" . The following quote would
> indicate
> > "given as far as I can tell, you've had precisely zero contact " that you
> > seem to know something about the level of contact between myself and
> others.
>
> Good point. Perhaps I should have qualified that comment by stating "online"
> contact, although this implication should be obvious. According to my
> recollections, and Google supports them, Eric Anderson and yourself have
> never, ever crossed paths in aus.net.access. By all means cite examples if I
> am wrong.
>
> > Also could you please explain my questions about the very clear
> similarities
> > between yourself and AJS? Could you also explain why AJS is replying to
> > almost every post you make. AJS replies even when noone else has replied.
>
> As everyone from myself to Spudley, your own one-time sympathiser has said,
> the "very clear similarities" exist only in your mind. AJS is so stupid, he
> has to resort to debating Nigel in search of a win - you know Nigel - the
> guy who's previous theories included the one that I was "EnjoyDialup" and
> later diversified to include the preposition that ]v[etaphoid=Res? Dare I
> say it AJS is happy for a supportive voice - all the moreso that it's one
> emanating from outside his head, and that is why he is usually to be found
> around both our posts. Luckily for him, I'm not so stupid as to assume that
> he and you are both the same fool, and if I ever did, I'd want to be relying
> on a bigger co-incidence than a shared membership of the world's most
> popular free news-server. It's a big world out there after all...
>
> > I notice that you have stopped refering to V© as Nige now that a certian
> > thing was pointed out to you. Coincidently AJs seems also to have stopped
> > refering to me as nige. However there are a few times when you and AJS
> > still use the term Nige/nige so this is not a 100% but it is still pretty
> > clear.
>
> That paragraph contradicts itself in the space of three sentences. Either, I
> "have stopped refering to V© as Nige" or I "still use the term Nige" - it is
> impossible to do both. To clear up your confusion, let me just reiterate
> that I have in the past abbreivated Nigel Howe's name to Nige, and I will no
> doubt continue to do likewise in the future. To further clear up your
> confusion, might I recommend you immediately cease the practice of
> masturbating during Dawson's Creek, particularly during scenes featuring
> James Van Der Beek.
>
> > It would seem you would have no grounds for having an opinion of V© one
> way
> > or the other, unlike say AJS, who it seems has a mutual motivation with V©
> > to make each other's lives as painful as possible.
> >
> > Care to enlighten us on this latest baffling mystery?
>
> On the contrary, a brief perusal of Google will reveal that myself and Nige
> have clashed on many occasions, and that beyond that, I oppose fraudulance,
> flatulence and rank stupidity in all their forms. Hence I have a long
> history of putting him in his grubby little place. This recent continuation
> is nothing new - he is just placing himself more firmly on my radar and
> hence will suffer greater attention as a result. Nothing that need concern
> you though...
>
> > Regards
> > ED (the one with only two brain cells (and all they do is argue with one
> > another))
>
> Thanks for your thoughts. I hope my answers have enlightened you. I look
> forward to hearing your response to the initial, ignored question, as can
> still be found at the bottom of this post.
>
> > - Originator of the unanswered throw back challenge for Vetaphool to prove
> > that he is not fraudulently masquerading as "AJS", the anti-HyperOz
> > consumer, ant-sympathiser and like-minded simpleton...
>
> Hmmm, Vetaphool - Nigel used to call me that... Regardless, I have no
> sympathy at all for ants, contrary to your poorly written attempt at
> flattery...
>
> >> Dear ED,
> >>
> >> I noticed you have modified your name, apparently to one parodying Eric
> >> Anderson, aka EnjoyDialup, the dyslexic nemesis of Nigel Howe.
> >>
> >> I was just wondering if you could explain the motivation behind this
> >> change, given as far as I can tell, you've had precisely zero contact
> with the
> >> aforementioned dyslexic ED. It would seem you would have no grounds for
> >> having an opinion of him one way or the other, unlike say Nigel Howe, who
> >> it seems has a mutual motivation with Eric to make each other's lives
> >> as painful as possible. But who definitely isn't one and same person as
> >> yourself...
> >>
> >> Care to enlighten us on this latest baffling mystery?
> >>
> >> --
> >> ]v[etaphoid
> >> - Originator of the unanswered $1,000 challenge for Nigel Howe to
> >> prove that he is not fraudulently masquerading as "ED", the rare
> satisfied
> >> HyperOz customer, sympathiser and like-minded simpleton...
The ED Dissleskic
LOL
"Tony Burns" <Wb...@bike.com> wrote in message
news:41F486AB...@bike.com...