Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Multiculturalism is not a scientific principle. It is a mystical concept designed to defeat Manifest Destiny and Social Darwinism

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Kangaroo Court Australia

unread,
Nov 13, 2012, 5:46:51 AM11/13/12
to
On Nov 13, 5:19 pm, corella <cocka...@aussieisp.net.au> wrote:
> A reasonable mind would quickly understand that
> all bankers, lawyers, property pimps, politicians,
> plague immigrationists, multiculturalists and
> priests should be quarantined for the good of
> humanity. Quite frankly, they are the enemies of
> life. The oppressive importance of "winning" in
> the mass immigration driven Ponzi scheme property
> market is the root cause of much of the misery,
> chaos and disorder in Australian society. This
> "winner take all" society is too brittle to
> survive. To fuel real estate rackets and keep
> wages low, Australia massively imports cheap
> ethnic scab labour with locust-like breeding
> habits. That scam requires Aussies to be force-fed
> multicultural vomit from the cradle to the grave.
>
> When once-unified societies regress under mass
> immigration and cultural diversity, they descend
> into civil strife. Yet the perceived costs of
> opposing plague immigration seem higher than just
> passively accepting it and waiting for it to
> destroy us. Monash University population expert Dr
> Bob Birrell said the huge influx of people with
> few or no English skills had created social
> problems in Melbourne suburbs such as Dandenong,
> Sunshine and Broadmeadows. "This is not a pretty
> picture," he said. Even real lemmings are never as
> stupid, or suicidal as Aussies became under the
> billionaire globalist regime of multiculturalism
> and plague immigration. The sucking pull of blind
> panic caused Aussies to take on unpayable levels
> of debt.
>
> By Australia "embracing" globalist plague
> immigration and its associated real estate Ponzi
> schemes, the nation entered a race to the third
> world bottom. The final nail may have been driven
> into the coffin of Australia's sovereign rights.
> Stupidly, Aussies let a globalist circus of
> political clowns and celebrity freaks, con,
> befuddle and frighten them. How can this sideshow
> be acceptable? When will the madness end? The time
> to pay attention to important issues is right now.
> Methodology for saving Australia: Stop feral
> immigration and implement a taxation-and-bonus
> system designed to lower the birth rate. Outlaw
> landlordism and property speculation.

agreed

dolf

unread,
Nov 13, 2012, 6:23:22 PM11/13/12
to
I have a question for you in relation to Knowledge Pragmatics and
Biblical Hermeneutics:

#0, #15 CE, #34 CE, #65 CE, #111 CE, #175 CE, #260 CE, #369 CE ... #2000 Y2K

If one considers # is a ternary conception of number associated with the
Julian and Gregorian calendar, isn't there is a logical notion of 'zero'
some 2012 years ago?

Is that #ZERO an important logical construct as the same NOTHING from
which their historical use of the magic square as Judaeo-Christian
kabbalistic occurs and precedes the geometric construct as its use today?

Reference: Aryeh Kaplan on Kabbalah

It is also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the
Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made
divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle
of the Chinese 2 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the
year into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a
magic square of #369 having a distinct mathematical property at centre
of #41 for the equivalent date of 13 September.

#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400] as 4000 BCE
#400 MOD 22 = 17 [#PE / #80]
#800 MOD 22 = 12 [#LAMED / #30]
#1200 MOD 22 = 7 [#ZAYIN / #7]
#1600 MOD 22 = 2 [#BETH / #2]
#2000 MOD 22 = 19 [#QOPH / #100]
#2400 MOD 22 = 14 [#NUN / #50]
#2800 MOD 22 = 9 [#TETH / #9]
#3200 MOD 22 = 4 [#DALETH / #4]
#3600 MOD 22 = 21 [#SHIN / #300]
#4000 MOD 22 = 16 [#'AYIN / #70] = #0 CE as HETEROS (MALE/FEMALE
MARRIAGE -- WHAT IS SIN & WICKEDNESS?) autonomic transformative
prototype and symbolic associator to the series #15 CE, #34 CE, #65 CE,
#111 CE, #175 CE, #260 CE, #369 CE ... #2000 Y2K
#4400 MOD 22 = 11 [#KAF / #20] = #400 CE
#4800 MOD 22 = 6 [#VAV / #6] = #800 CE
#5200 MOD 22 = 1 [#ALEPH / #1] = #1200 CE
#5600 MOD 22 = 18 [#TSADE / #90] = #1600 CE
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40] = #2000 Y2K / Equinox of DATE(1996,3,20)
+ (5 * 364) + 182 days = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle

#6400 MOD 22 = 8 [#CHET / #8]
#6800 MOD 22 = 3 [#GIMEL / #3]
#7200 MOD 22 = 20 [#RESH / #200]
#7600 MOD 22 = 15 [#SAMEK / #60]
#8000 MOD 22 = 10 [#YOD / #10]
#8400 MOD 22 = 5 [#HE / #5]
#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400] as 8800 CE

In many instances, the Torah also uses words and phrases in ways that
cannot be understood in their literal sense. There are a number of very
obvious examples of this in the narrative of the Creation, for the
metaphysical events that took place at that time were far removed from
the natural order of the world we know today. They could not have been
accurately described in ways that we can understand, nor in language
that we can relate to. For example, the Torah tells us how God brought
the world into being through speech, when in fact He created the world
through a form of thought. When the Torah describes God's thought
process as speech, it makes it easier for us to grasp the idea on our
own level. [Copyright Š 2001 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and www.Torah.org]

--
- dolf
- www.grapple369.com

dolf

unread,
Nov 13, 2012, 6:54:06 PM11/13/12
to
On 13/11/12 9:46 PM, Kangaroo Court Australia wrote:
I have a question for you in relation to Knowledge Pragmatics and
Biblical Hermeneutics:

#0, #15 CE, #34 CE, #65 CE, #111 CE, #175 CE, #260 CE, #369 CE ... #2000 Y2K

If one considers # is a ternary conception of number associated with the
Julian and Gregorian calendar, isn't there is a logical notion of 'zero'
some 2012 years ago?

Is that #ZERO an important logical construct as the same NOTHING from
which their historical use of a celestial hierarchy by association to
the progression of magic square as Judaeo-Christian kabbalistic that
according to Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan occurs and precedes the geometric
construct as its use today?

Reference: Aryeh Kaplan on Kabbalah

You can't get more multi-cultural than the ternary conception of number
associated with the I CHING (64 elements) and DAO TE CHING (81 elements)
use of 4.5 days per square of the #81 numbers = 364.5 days of the
natural year during the HAN dynasty and which comprised the Chinese
system of Empire governance and particular calendar.

SpambustЯ

unread,
Nov 13, 2012, 6:55:12 PM11/13/12
to
On 13/11/2012 3:23 PM, dolf wrote:
> On 13/11/12 9:46 PM, Kangaroo Court Australia wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 5:19 pm, corella <cocka...@aussieisp.net.au> wrote:




--
SPAMMED TO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT

ConsЯcons

unread,
Nov 13, 2012, 7:01:29 PM11/13/12
to
On 13/11/2012 3:23 PM, dolf wrote:
> own level. [Copyright © 2001 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and www.Torah.org]
>

SpambustЯ

unread,
Nov 13, 2012, 7:03:21 PM11/13/12
to
> own level. [Copyright © 2001 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and www.Torah.org]
>


--

Kangaroo Court Australia

unread,
Nov 13, 2012, 8:41:52 PM11/13/12
to
disagree
0 new messages